Ukraine Reportedly Used British Tanks During Its Surprise Incursion Into Russia

Ukraine used British Tanks during its surprise incursion into Russia, it has been reported.

Military sources told Sky News that Challenger 2 tanks took part in the daring advance, which left Vladimir Putin stunned.

Kyiv’s troops launched a cross-border attack on the southwestern Kursk region, 330 miles from Moscow.

The Russian president described it as a “major provocation” and accused Ukraine of the “indiscriminate shelling of civilian” targets.

The Ukrainian operation came two-and-a-half years after Russia invaded its neighbour, sparking the ongoing conflict.

Britain is among a number of western countries supplying Ukraine with military hardware to defend itself.

The Ministry of Defence said it could not comment on “operational” matters, but confirmed there had been no change of policy since the government said Kyiv was free to use UK weapons on Russian soil.

The Ukraine army’s 82nd Air Assault Brigade, which has been using British tanks, took part in the incursion, which was launched last week.

Ukraine now claims to control 386 square miles (1,000 square km) of the Kursk region, according to Associated Press news agency.

Reports from Moscow say more than 8,000 Russians have been evacuated, and more than 6,000 put into temporary accommodation centres.

Earlier this week, Vladimir Putin said Ukraine was waging war against Russia “with the help of its western masters”.

“The enemy will continue to try to destabilise the situation in the border zone, in order to shake up the internal political situation in our country,” the president said, according to Reuters.

Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelenkyy said: “It is only fair to destroy Russian terrorists where they are, where they launch their strikes from. Russian military airfields, Russian logistics.

“We see how useful this can be for bringing peace closer. Russia must be forced into peace if Putin wants to continue waging war so badly.

“Russia brought war to others, and now it is coming home.”

Share Button

Russia Slapped Down At UN Meeting As Ukrainian Allies Remind Moscow It Is Not A ‘Victim’

Russia did not get the sympathy it was hoping for at an informal UN Security Council meeting on Tuesday.

Ukraine has managed to humiliate Moscow over the last nine days by breaching Russia’s southern borders, reaching into the Kursk region and taking 100 Russian troops as prisoners of war.

Kyiv says it is already occupying 1,000 sq km (386 sq miles) – that’s the same amount of Ukrainian land Russia has seized so far this year.

Despite often boasting of its military prowess and Vladimir Putin’s promise to “kick the enemy out”, Moscow is struggling to remove the Ukrainian forces.

And it’s certainly not getting any help from the West judging from what happened at the informal the UN Security Council.

Ukraine’s allies, the US, France and the UK, did not waver in their support for Kyiv during the mini stand-off, and instead chose not mention the Kursk attack at all.

Russia’s deputy UN ambassador Dmitry Polyanskiy said: “We haven’t heard a word of condemnation of these actions from the Western sponsors of the Kyiv regime who continue to cover up the abhorrent crimes of their puppet.”

He claimed Ukrainians have been killing Russian civilians and questioned what Kyiv wants with the attack, adding: “I would be grateful for the explanation how intentionally targeting civilians serves the goal of disrupting attacks on Ukrainian territory, given the fact that there were no military objects or infrastructure in the area.”

Several members instead accused Russia of hypocrisy, double standards and wasting the council’s time, listing all the ways Moscow has been accused of breaking humanitarian law in Ukraine.

According to Reuters news agency, senior Slovenian diplomat Klemen Ponikvar said: “We will not recognise the aggressor as the victim.”

Military vehicles drive near the Russian-Ukrainian border in Sumy region, Ukraine, Tuesday, Aug. 13, 2024.
Military vehicles drive near the Russian-Ukrainian border in Sumy region, Ukraine, Tuesday, Aug. 13, 2024.

via Associated Press

UK diplomat Kate Jones said: “We will never falter in our support for Ukraine for as long as it takes to secure just and sustainable peace based on the principles of the UN Charter and international law.”

And US diplomat Caleb Pine joined in, saying: “There is no question as to which country has committed numerous well-documented atrocities, including war crimes and crimes against humanity, on Ukraine’s sovereign territory. That country is Russia.”

The amount of land Kyiv is occupying is nothing compared to the 18% (109,000 sq km or 42,000 sq miles) of its Ukrainian territory Russia is currently claiming as its own, more than two years after its invasion of its European neighbour.

However, diplomats from Syria, Belarus and North Korea spoke out for Russia at the meeting.

Moscow has called Ukraine’s surprising offensive a “major provocation” and claims the country is just trying to strengthen its hand in any upcoming peace negotiations.

The whole operation has been shrouded in secrecy.

Kyiv has not revealed the exact purpose of this offensive, although it has said it has no plans to annex the Russian land, like Moscow has done with Ukrainian land.

Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy remained elusive on Monday, just saying: “Russia must be forced into peace if Putin wants to continue waging war so badly.”

Ukraine’s allies have repeatedly claimed they had no prior warning of the offensive – the West is also eager to avoid the Ukraine-Russia war pulling NATO into direct conflict.

Kyiv only confirmed that it had indeed breached Russia’s borders on Saturday, days after it first broke through.

And, according to Reuters, both Ukraine and Russia have barred journalists from the battlefield, meaning any claims made by either side cannot be independently verified.

Share Button

Russia – And Possibly Farage – May Be Looked At By Security Services In Riots Probe, Ex-MI6 Head Says

The former head of MI6 claimed the intelligence services will be investigating Russia, Tommy Robinson and possibly even Nigel Farage in their probe into how the far-right riots started.

The UK was hit by a wave of far-right extremism and violence earlier this month, triggered by social media disinformation around the suspect in the Southport stabbings, where three young girls were killed.

Various accounts falsely claimed the person behind the horrific incident was an asylum seeker and on the MI6 watchlist – allegations which then acted as a catalyst for the anti-immigration riots.

Former MI6 spy, Christopher Steele, previously put together a dossier on Donald Trump’s relations with Russia.

He worked for MI6 between 1987 and 2009, and believes intelligence services will now be looking at who evoked the riots.

He told Times Radio on Sunday he believes Russia was involved, while also noting that English Defence League (EDL) founder Robinson, and Reform Party leader, MP Farage, could also be under the spotlight.

Steele said: “I think the Security Service will be looking very carefully at the instigators of these activities, including people like Tommy Robinson, even conceivably Nigel Farage, who incidentally said that we were being misinformed by the government about Southport.”

Farage falsely claimed the police were not telling the whole truth around the tragedies in Southport shortly after the stabbings first happened, and suggested the suspect was already known to the security services.

Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, has been encouraging the riots online while on holiday in Cyprus.

Steele continued: “The Security Services require warrants, obviously, to do some of that.

“But I think essentially, looking at communications, looking at travel, looking at financial transfers is the heart of this problem.

“And if we’re going to get to the bottom of it, certainly the government should be doing those things in terms of the instigators. Now, whether Nigel Farage in the end is defined as an instigator of this, I don’t know.”

He added: “They’ll be looking at things like their travel movements, who they’ve been in touch with, monetary transfers, and so on, because that will reveal or not, as the case may be a pattern of behaviour, which can lead to some conclusions about the degree to which Russia has been interfering in this situation.”

Steele explained that he thinks think it’s “clear” there is some Russian involvement, but added: “The degree to which that’s happened and the effectiveness I think is still out for question.

“I mean, when you look at the original disinformation that surrounded the Southport killings, that does seem to have come from a Russian linked website.

“It’s in very much Russia’s interest to destabilise countries like Britain and the United States.”

Share Button

Mexico Says It Will Not Arrest Putin if He Visits The Country, Despite Plea From Ukraine

Mexico has just rejected Ukraine’s request to arrest Vladimir Putin if he visits the North American country later this year.

The Russian president may defy the international arrest warrant out against him and attend the inauguration of Mexico’s next president in October.

Kyiv asked Mexico to arrest him if he did turn up when president-elect Claudia Sheinbaum is sworn in.

It comes after Sheinbaum’s team invited Putin to the ceremony, along with all countries it has a diplomatic relationship with.

After all, Putin appears to be on positive terms with the incoming president.

When Sheinbaum was elected in June, he called her to congratulate her and said the country was a “historically friendly partner of Russia in Latin America”.

Outgoing Mexican president, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, told reporters at a press conference on Thursday that the country would not arrest Putin if he did visit, adding: “We can’t do that. It’s not up to us.”

The remark comes after Ukraine’s Mexican embassy wrote to the central government on August 7.

“We hope the Mexican government is aware that Vladimir Putin is a war criminal with an arrest warrant against him,” the embassy said in a statement.

It pointed to the UN’s International Criminal Court has accused Putin of war crimes and of personal responsibility for the abduction of children from Ukraine.

The warrant was issued last year, months after Putin ordered the invasion of Ukraine.

But the effectiveness of the ICC ruling relies on international cooperation.

While Russia is not a signatory of the ICC, Mexico is.

If Mexico chooses not to follow the ICC ruling, then Putin may be empowered to travel further afield in the future.

That would mean the Russian president can enjoy more international freedom, despite being accused of war crimes.

Meanwhile, Russia’s war against Ukraine has been rumbling on for more than two years.

According to reports, Putin was furious that Ukrainian forces breached the Russian border earlier this week, calling it a “major provocation”.

Kyiv has not commented on the alleged attack.

Share Button

Russian Government Spokesperson Has A Rather Unhelpful Take On UK Riots – And Brits’ Right To Protest

A top Russian politician in Vladimir Putin’s government has weighed in on the far-right riots in the UK, claiming people “have every right to express their disagreement” with the government.

Maria Zakharova, the spokesperson for Russia’s foreign ministry, took aim at Downing Street rather than the anti-immigration extremists who have caused chaos up and down the country over the last week.

In a statement released on Russia’s ministry of foreign affairs’ website, she claimed the British government was paying “lip service to what it called the democratic principles” after home secretary Yvette Cooper told police to be as “tough and harsh as possible”.

More than 400 protesters have been arrested in the last week with many charged for their connection to the disorder.

It comes after social media misinformation incited looting, arson, disorder and violence up and down the country.

Zakharova said: “It is now up to the UK authorities and police to stay within the confines of the law.”

It’s worth remembering there is an international arrest warrant out against Putin for the unlawful deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia.

Still, Zakharova claimed: “It must be recalled that people have every right to express their disagreement with the government policies.

“In this context, Russia calls on London to refrain from any unjustified or unproportionate [sic] use of violence against protestors and ensure their right to freedom of assembly.”

Russia actually has a history of violently suppressing early signs of dissent itself.

Moscow even arrested peaceful protesters who held up blank pieces of paper shortly after Putin invaded Ukraine in February 2022.

Zakharova also claimed: “Russia is known for opposing and never allowing itself to meddle into the domestic affairs of other countries.”

Moscow has, over the years, been accused of interfering in major events in other countries, including the last UK general election and the ongoing Paris Olympics.

Russia has repeatedly denied such accusations, though.

Zakharova continued: “This is why our country refrains from lecturing others on ways of overcoming their internal challenges and crises.

“On the contrary, it is the Western countries, led by the United States, who act this way.

“They would have been better off paying more attention to their own challenges instead of seeking to undermine stability around the world.”

The UK, along with Ukraine’s other Western allies, has been providing military aid and financial support to Kyiv to protect it against Russia’s land grab over the last two and a half years.

Moscow has subsequently taken aim at the West repeatedly, often threatening to deploy its nuclear weapons.

Share Button

Putin Makes Rare Admission That Life Is ‘Not Easy’ For Russians Right Now

Vladimir Putin has just acknowledged life in Russia is “not easy” right now – although he dodged any explanation as to why.

Speaking on the national holiday of Russia Day, the president tried to convey a message of unity amid these times of difficulty.

According to state news agency TASS, Putin said: “At the time that is not easy for our country, we are again united by patriotism and responsibility for the fate of the Motherland.

“They serve as a reliable bedrock for the participants in the special military operation.”

This is the phrase the Kremlin has repeatedly used to refer to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Putin has only used the word “war” in public on a handful of occasions since he ordered his troops into Ukraine more than two years ago.

As he continued to speak in these indirect phrases, Putin said: “It is possible to solve the major tasks our country is facing only together, only in a concerted way.”

This call for unity comes as small groups of protesters are starting to push back against the war.

Women are calling on Putin to return their loved ones from the frontline after they were forced to serve in the 2022 partial mobilisation.

Putin also claimed that, on Russia Day, the public should show “reverence” to the country’s “centuries-long history”.

He added: “I therefore consider necessary, historically proper to celebrate the Russia Day as the symbol of continuity of the millennia-old way of our Fatherland.”

Russia Day, first celebrated more than three decades ago after the fall of the Soviet Union, was meant to signal a new chapter for the country – and to stop the public looking back at its past.

And, earlier this week, the president bizarrely revealed that he had deliberately chosen not to take the controversial flag of the Russian Empire of a building down.

He said: “Everything happens for a reason. This is it. No need to look for any underlying connotations, for any sort of imperial ambitions in this regard. There are none.”

Meanwhile, Russia’s former president and Putin’s close ally Dmitry Medvedev posted a provocative video on social media to mark the national occasion.

It showed the Russian flag unfurling over the whole of the country – and Ukraine, suggesting they were completely one.

Share Button

Putin And Xi Have Denied The Obvious With A Strange Take On Russia’s Relationship With China

Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping have revealed that they apparently share a rather unusual view on Russia and China’s place in the world.

The Russian president is currently on a rare two-day state visit to Beijing to visit one of his few remaining allies after his illegal invasion of Ukraine, Xi.

According to the Russian state news agency, TASS, Putin began his trip by claiming relations between Moscow and Beijing “are not opportunistic and are not directed against anyone”.

While this year marks the 75th anniversary of positive relations between the two countries, there’s no doubt that this “bond” deepened after Putin invaded Ukraine in 2022.

Beijing supplies Moscow with essential equipment used to build weapons, while also buying enough Russian fossil fuels to keep the economy afloat amid Western sanctions.

China stops short of offering actual weapons or ammunition though, so as to dodge the West’s ire.

However, Putin did not mention any of this transactional relationship – in public, at least.

Instead, he said: “Our cooperation in world affairs today serves as one of the main stabilising factors in the international arena.”

Putin continued: “Together, we uphold the principles of justice and a democratic world order that reflects multipolar realities and is based on international law.”

Similarly, Chinese outlet Xinhua reported that the Xi said their close cooperation helped maintain positive global stability and promote greater democracy.

“China and Russia defend a world order based on international law,” Xi said.

An international arrest warrant is actually out against Putin right now over for the illegal deportation and transfer of children during the Ukraine war.

This move prompted the leader of a group seeking independence for the Uyghur people from China to request a similar warrant for Xi.

The Chinese leader has also faced international condemnation for the suppression of protests in Hong Kong.

Putin was just re-elected for his fifth term in office in a sham election, after he eliminated all feasible opposition – and China is known as a one-party state.

However, both leaders claim to be figures of harmony.

Referring to Xi as “my dear friend”, Putin said: “We are determined to further harmonise integration processes in the Eurasian space.”

The Russian president also thanked his Chinese counterpart for his efforts to “regulate the situation” in Ukraine, referring to Beijing’s 12-point plan to end the Ukraine war.

Share Button

US House Of Representatives Passes Aid For Ukraine Following Months Of Delay

The House of Representatives approved a $60.8 billion (£49 billion) package of aid for the embattled country of Ukraine on Saturday, ending a months-long attempt by Republicans to leverage the Ukraine money to extract concessions on border security from the White House.

The overwhelmingly bipartisan vote, 311 to 112, was never in doubt even as the path to get to the vote was a long and circuitous one beginning in September of last year.

As in past votes, the final tally was bipartisan, but weighted toward Democrats ― 210 voted in favour, joined by 101 House Republicans. A majority of Republicans, though — 112 — voted against the aid, while no Democrats did.

“This is now up to the American people,” said Representative Mike Quigley (Democrat, Illinois), a co-chair of the bipartisan Congressional Ukraine Caucus, noting that the money should be enough to get Ukraine past the US elections later this year.

“The decision in November will be a decision for Ukraine and Eastern Europe and NATO. That’s the next turning point.”

The bill is one in a four-part, $95 billion (£76.8 billion) package, which also includes $26.4 billion (£21.3 billion) in military aid for Israel and $8.1 billion (£6 billion) for Taiwan and other Asian allies. Another bill in the package also allows for confiscation of official Russian government assets in the US and requires social media app TikTok to divest its US operations from its Chinese owners or face a ban.

It heads now to the Senate, which passed a very similar package without the Russian asset seizure and Tiktok divestiture language, in February. While opponents of the aid to Ukraine are expected to try to delay passage, the Senate vote in February had 70 backers.

President Joe Biden has signalled he will sign the bill once it clears Congress. That would put an end to a fight Republicans picked in late September, when then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (Republican, California) jettisoned a smaller $6 billion (£4.85 billion) Ukraine aid package from a stopgap spending bill, choosing to tie its passage to the White House and Democrats agreeing to border security changes.

After a few months’ standoff, Republican Senator James Lankford (Republican, Oklahoma) and Democratic Senator Chris Murphy (Democrat, Connecticut) tried to negotiate a bipartisan deal on Ukraine aid and border security — only to see it fall apart. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump helped sink the bill by posting his disapproval of it on social media, causing Senate Republicans to balk.

The Senate bill funding Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan aid sat untouched by House Republicans for months — until Iran’s attack on Israel on April 13, which kicked efforts to pass Israel aid back into high gear.

House Speaker Mike Johnson (Republican, Louisiana), who had held off action on Ukraine aid, reversed course on Wednesday, saying, “I would rather send bullets to Ukraine than American boys.”

The vote on Saturday unfolded against the backdrop of that history, and while the outcome was not in doubt, emotions were still raw.

House Democrats on the floor passed out small Ukrainian flags and waved them as the time to vote ticked down. This angered some Republicans who called for the presiding officer to enforce the chamber’s rules of decorum that prohibit literal flag-waving.

The episode also showed that Republicans still believe the border remains a potent political issue.

“We had members of Congress in there waving the Ukrainian flag on the United States House of Representatives floor, while we’re doing nothing to secure our border?” said Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (Republican, Georgia) “I think every American in this country should be furious.”

Representative Eric Burlison (Republican, Missouri) posted a picture of the Democrats and the flags to social media.

“Democrats waiving Ukrainian flags on the House floor tells you everything you need to know about their priorities,” he wrote. “Ukraine first, America last.”

To get around immigration hardliners within his own party, who opposed advancing the package without a border crackdown, Johnson turned to Democrats to both get it on the House floor and to pass.

That choice to work with them might have major repercussions for the speaker. After the vote to advance the new package bill on Friday, Greene picked up the support of another member, Representative Paul Gosar (Republican, Arizona), for her call for a vote on whether Johnson should remain in the speaker’s chair. With Representative Thomas Massie (Republican, Kentucky), Greene’s group has the numbers to depose Johnson if a vote came and no Democrats supported Johnson.

Greene told reporters on Saturday that she had no immediate plans to force the issue, and hinted that she may simply wait for new party leadership elections after November.

“He’s already a lame duck,” she said of Johnson. “If we had the vote today in our conference, he would not be speaker today.”

On the battlefield, Ukrainian officials have blamed Congress’ delays for recent losses, as Russian attackers have pressed the advantage. In February, Ukraine lost a long-held eastern outpost named Avdiivka, a development the White House blamed directly on an artillery shortage. And Kyiv lost a major power station when it ran out of air defence missiles, according to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

The delay may also have sent encouragement to Russian President Vladimir Putin, Democrats say. With the West’s attention drawn to the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, Putin has been able to step up the tempo of drone and missile attacks on Ukraine.

Representative Steny Hoyer (Democrat, Maryland) said the final package was essentially the same as what the Senate sent over in February, with the backing of 70 votes there.

“I’m sorry that we didn’t take it up immediately because I think we sent a muddled message to the international community about the resolve that this country had for defending freedom,” he said on Friday.

Share Button

David Cameron Has Met With Donald Trump Despite Previously Describing Him As ‘Stupid’

David Cameron has met with Donald Trump despite previously describing him as “divisive, stupid and wrong”.

The foreign secretary held talks with the former president as he tries to boost Republican support for Ukraine.

Trump, who will be his party’s presidential candidate in November, has previously said he could end the Russia-Ukraine war “within 24 hours”.

But experts have condemned the plan, which they say would see Kyiv forced to make major concessions to Vladimir Putin in return for an end to the conflict.

Cameron met with Trump overnight at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida before heading to Washington for talks with US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken.

Ahead of the meeting, a Foreign Office spokesman said: “It is standard practice for ministers to meet with opposition candidates as part of their routine international engagement.”

However, the meeting had the potential to be awkward given Cameron’s previous comments about Trump – and the former president’s well-known dislike of being criticised.

When he was still prime minister in 2016, Cameron described Trump – who was running to be president first time around – as “divisive, stupid and wrong”.

And in his memoirs after he quit Downing Street, Cameron said Trump was “protectionist, xenophobic, misogynistic”.

The foreign secretary’s talks with the former president came amid mounting concerns that Russia is gaining the upper hand in its war with Ukraine.

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has called on the west to boost its financial support for his country – but Republicans in America have tried to block President Joe Biden’s multi-billion dollar aid package.

Cameron has previously drawn the ire of leading Republicans over his pro-Ukraine comments.

In February, leading right-winger Marjorie Taylor Greene said Cameron could “kiss my ass” after he drew comparisons between the appeasement of Adolf Hitler when urging the US Congress not to abandon Ukraine.

Share Button

In The Least Surprising News Ever, Vladimir Putin Has Won The Russian Election

Vladimir Putin has been re-elected Russian president after winning a landslide victory in the country’s election.

In a result that was a surprise to absolutely no one, he won another six-year term in charge after receiving nearly 88% of the vote.

The three other candidates – Nikolai Kharitonov, Vladislav Davankov and Leonid Slutskywere predictably miles behind, with none of them managing to poll more than 4%.

It will be his fifth term as president of Russia, having first been elected to the post in 2000. He was also the country’s prime minister between 2008 and 2012.

Foreign secretary David Cameron dismissed the result by insisting the elections had not been “free and fair”.

He said: “The polls have have closed in Russia, following the illegal holding of elections on Ukrainian territory, a lack of choice for voters and no independent OSCE [Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe] monitoring.

“This is not what free and fair elections look like.”

But former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev, a close ally of Putin, took to X (formerly Twitter) shortly after the result was announced.

In a bizarre post, he said: “Congratulations to all Russia’s enemies on Vladimir Putin’s brilliant victory in the election of the President of the Russian Federation. And a thank you to friends for the support.”

The result was never in doubt because no candidates opposed to the war in Ukraine were allowed to stand.

One potential opposition candidate who did attract some popular support, Boris Nadezhdin, was barred from running a month ago.

Some voters did register their opposition to Putin’s regime by vandalising voting booths during the three-day election.

Footage emerged online of one woman pouring ink into a ballot box after voting, while there were also arson attacks at some polling stations.

Thousands of voters also took part in a “noon against Putin” protest at polling stations across the country and at Russian embassies around the world.

Share Button