Greens On Edge As Party Waits To See How Polanski Fares In The Burnham Era

“Stop reading this. Go campaign in Holborn and St Pancras,” a sign declared at this year’s Green Party conference.

It’s rare for political parties to tell attendees to leave their annual get-togethers. It’s even rarer for it to come from the party leader.

But the banner was proudly draped across a stall set aside for Zack Polanski’s Bold Politics podcast this weekend.

The sign sums up a tension simmering beneath a party already rowing over potentially adopting a motion to declare “Zionism is racism”.

The Green Party leader is running to be the next MP for Keir Starmer’s old seat in Holborn and St Pancras, a Labour stronghold.

The trouble is, the by-election is a week away – and, according to Green sources, the last weekend of door-knocking is usually when they manage to win over more voters.

Polanski’s team tried to get the conference delayed so members could focus on winning over north-west London constituents, but party executives refused.

A party spokesperson has since blamed the Labour government for deliberately timing the by-election so that it would overshadow their conference.

Labour did not reply when approached for comment – the party seems to have adopted an approach of not even acknowledging their left-wing rivals.

Its statement in response to Polanski’s keynote address did not even mention the Greens or the leader’s name, instead focusing on Burnham’s achievements.

Either way, Polanski clearly followed his own advice to focus on campaigning.

He arrived at conference on Thursday night and left an hour after his speech on Friday, mid-afternoon, even though the conference runs until 4.30pm on Sunday.

Asked about the conflicting events, campaigners looked nervous but insisted to HuffPost UK there was no “divide”.

They claimed there would be plenty of people door-knocking and more than enough members at their “best-ever attended conference”.

"Stop reading this. Go campaign in Holborn and St Pancras to elect our 6th Green MP," Polanski's own podcast said
“Stop reading this. Go campaign in Holborn and St Pancras to elect our 6th Green MP,” Polanski’s own podcast said

HuffPost UK

Still, it was hard to escape the feeling that the Greens were already laying the groundwork for a significant loss in the crunch by-election.

Labour prime minister Andy Burnham’s popularity is soaring and his party’s candidate Sagal Abdi-Wali is the frontrunner in the race.

Polanski – currently a London Assembly member but with a major public profile – has taken a big risk in contesting the seat. He has a lot to lose.

Polanski told the Guardian that he does not need to win the by-election to stay as Green leader, describing it as a “50/50” contest.

He said the election had ramifications for politics across the UK but “not for my leadership”.

Spokespeople told reporters that the fact there is even a chance the Greens could take the seat of a former prime minister shows “how incredibly successful Zack’s leadership has been”.

To an extent, they are right: Polanski has overseen a huge increase in membership for the Green party, surging from 68,500 members to 230,000 in June.

They also stand by their August predict that they would secure between 30 to 50 MPs if a general election were held today.

However, POLITICO’s poll of polls puts the party in fourth place on 11% – the lowest score since last October, shortly after Polanski took over the leadership.

There are now concerns that he has peaked after polling in second place behind Reform back in March, when the party soared to 18%.

Even a senior party figure admitted HuffPost UK that Burnham is very popular among their own supporters.

They said: “He’s never shafted the left, to be honest. I think we’ll give him a fair hearing until the Budget. But people really, really like him – unlike Starmer!”

Polanski also used his keynote speech not to hint at replacing Labour, as he did last year, but to frame the Greens as a pressure group to move the government leftwards.

“Vote Green and watch Labour move,” he told the party faithful.

But in autumn 2025, Polanski said: “We’re here to replace Labour.”

Party sources later told reporters that the party leader’s speech was still focused on the gap between “what Labour says and how it doesn’t actually act”.

“It’s a change of emphasis rather than the fact that we think we can’t replace the Labour Party,” they insisted.

Asked about the possibility of ever forming a coalition with the Labour Party on Friday, officials seemed unclear about their plan now Burnham is in power.

“It would be up to members after the general election,” they said, dodging the question.

It’s a much weaker position than the one previously adopted by Polanski, when he ruled out doing a deal with a Starmer-led Labour Party.

But it shows how the Greens are in no-man’s land right now, as they struggle to retain their progressive base in the Burnham era.

The question is, will next week’s crunch vote give them a much-needed boost by electing Polanski – or relegate them to the sidelines once more?

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Share Button

Alison Hammond Shares Update After Leaving This Morning Studio Mid-Broadcast

Alison Hammond has assured fans that she’s doing well after abruptly leaving Friday’s edition of This Morning mid-show.

During the live broadcast, Alison sparked concern when she was seen walking off camera clutching her chest and panting, and did not return.

Fortunately, she shared an update with her Instagram followers that afternoon, revealing she was getting checked over by doctors after what she described as a “little bit of a palpitation”.

“I know you’re all worried about me,” she began in a post on her story. “Honestly, I am fine, first of all – but I’m getting my old ticker checked out. I had a little bit of a palpation, and now, I’m getting it all checked out.

“But I think I’m OK – I’m hoping it was just a little panic attack or something like that.”

The Great British Bake Off host went on to say: “I love you all, thank you for all your lovely messages.

“I’m so sorry I left you – I would never normally do that, I would never leave a TV show, so you know I wasn’t very well. But hopefully I’m going to be alright. The doctors are so lovely and they’re checking me out, and hopefully everything’s going to be fine.”

She then quipped: “Well, everything is fine, look! I’m rocking it! Look how good I look! I’ve still got my makeup on from This Morning. Lush!”

Alison signed off her message by telling her fans “love you, babs!”, joking in the caption: “Anything to have a day off.”

Alison Hammond in the This Morning studio earlier this year
Alison Hammond in the This Morning studio earlier this year

Ken McKay/ITV/Shutterstock

After an abrupt ad break, Alison’s regular co-host Dermot O’Leary told This Morning viewers: “Ali’s feeling just a little unwell, so she’s had to duck out. Hopefully, she’ll be back in a sec.”

Dermot and Alison have hosted the ITV daytime show together on Fridays and during school holidays since 2020.

Share Button

Jessica Lange As Margaret Thatcher In American Horror Story Has Everyone Asking ‘WTF?’

Anyone watching the new season of American Horror Story will already know that it’s been a bit of an assault on the senses.

The 13th run of Ryan Murphy’s anthology series serves as something of a “greatest hits” outing, bringing together characters from previous seasons in one massive (and, at times, baffling) crossover event, with the cast including returning faces like Jessica Lange, Sarah Paulson, Evan Peters and Kathy Bates.

In the latest instalment, Jessica – as her Freak Show alter-ego Elsa Mars – was seen leading a Satanic ritual that saw 13 different women being condemned to hell.

So far, so American Horror Story.

What viewers were definitely not prepared for was that Jessica would then appear in another form, as former prime minister Margaret Thatcher.

Margaret Thatcher is one of five characters Jessica Lange has played in the current season of American Horror Story
Margaret Thatcher is one of five characters Jessica Lange has played in the current season of American Horror Story

“Margaret Thatcher, school milk-snatcher,” Elsa says of the former PM, describing her as a “common enemy to the common people” and “union-busting bitch” whose “callous disregard sent Irish hunger-strikers to their death”.

The two-time Oscar winner, as Thatcher, was then heard repeating the infamous line: “Crime is crime is crime. It is not political, it is a crime.”

After refusing to apologise for her actions while in power, Jessica’s Thatcher was then seen being confined to hell.

Other historical women depicted in the sequence included Wallis Simpson, Brigitte Bardot, Jezebel and Eva Braun, as well as fictitious AHS characters like Tuberculous Karen and Hypodermic Sally (both of whom were played by Sarah Paulson).

If all of that left you feeling a little confused, rest assured that those watching the episode felt pretty much the same:

Thatcher was prime minister between 1979 and 1990, and died in 2013, at the age of 87, after suffering a stroke.

She has previously been portrayed on the big and small screen by the likes of Meryl Streep and Gillian Anderson.

Meryl picked up her third Oscar win for her work in the historical biopic The Iron Lady, while Gillian won an Emmy for her performance in season four of Netflix’s The Crown.

Share Button

‘Here for Chris’ mental health initiative launched

Chris Kamara has helped launch ‘Here for Chris’ a new men’s mental health initiative in Guernsey.

Share Button

Coroner warns of risk of future deaths at mental health unit where patient was killed

Hugo Flint-Cahan, 34, was fatally attacked by Rolando Torres-Pena, 22, at a mental health trust in east London.

Share Button

Richard E Grant’s Day 1 Admission Gives The Traitors Its Most Chaotic Launch Ever

Warning: This article contains major spoilers for The Celebrity Traitors.

Remember last year when Alan Carr couldn’t get through trying to tell his Celebrity Traitors co-stars that he was a Faithful without bursting out laughing?

At the time, we really thought that’d be the epitome of how blatant someone could be as a Traitor on the Bafta-winning reality show.

Well, Richard E Grant took that and said “hold my poisoned chalice”.

Yes, any doubts that The Celebrity Traitors couldn’t live up to last year’s series went out the castle window mere minutes into the Thursday night’s launch show.

Richard E Grant
Richard E Grant

BBC/Studio Lambert/Cody Burridge/BBC Creative

During the first episode of the new season, Richard was chosen by host Claudia Winkleman as one of this year’s “Traitors”, alongside Love Island host Maya Jama.

And before he’d set foot in the turret or donned his iconic cloak, the Other Bennet Sister actor had already landed himself at the centre of suspicion.

Following Claudia’s decision, the cast immediately began interrogating one another to look for early clues, with Joe Lycett insisting to Richard, truthfully, that he was part of the “Faithful”.

In the jaw-dropping scenes that followed, Joe reversed the question, asking the Oscar nominee outright: “What are you?”

Richard then somewhat overplayed his hand, trying to nonchalantly tell Joe and fellow comedian Rob Beckett: “Traitor.”

After a beat, they grilled him again, to which he doubled down: “Traitor. What’s the point in the being in the game if you’re not?”

“Right. OK,” a perplexed Joe responded, with James Blunt quipping: “That’s an interesting angle. You need to be very careful.”

Richard E Grant's attempted double bluff left Joe Lycett stunned on The Celebrity Traitors
Richard E Grant’s attempted double bluff left Joe Lycett stunned on The Celebrity Traitors

Indeed, what Richard clearly intended to be a light-hearted joke or double bluff clearly came out a lot more seriously than he hoped, leading to suspicion in the castle growing like wildfire (apart from where Jerry Hall was concerned, as she maintained that her pal was kidding, even though he wasn’t…).

By the end of the episode, when it came to Richard and Maya recruiting a new Traitor, the duo narrowed it down to two of the actor’s biggest sceptics, to immediately try and diffuse the situation.

The launch show ended with James Acaster and Amol Rajan lying in two separate coffins, with one about to be recruited by the Traitors, and the other poised to become the series’ first casualty.

So yes, you might say that the new series is off to an absolutely flying start – and that’s without even getting into Julie Hesmondhalgh getting out of her chapel pew to tell everyone what a fan she was of them, Ross Kemp suspecting everyone who brushed against him of being a Traitor, and Claudia Winkleman sporting an outfit that looked like it was styled out of whipped cream.

Oh, Celebrity Traitors. It’s so good to have you back.

Find out who has been eliminated in the first murder of the season when The Celebrity Traitors returns on Friday at 8pm on BBC One and BBC iPlayer.

Share Button

You Won’t Want To Miss This Week’s ‘Beautiful’ Orionid Meteor Shower

Stargazers have been spoiled this year. Aside from the usual Lyrid and Eta Aquariid meteor showers, we’ve also enjoyed a solar eclipse – which was itself followed by a Perseid meteor shower in what was termed a “cosmic double whammy”.

Now, we’re due for what NASA calls “one of the most beautiful [meteor] showers of the year”: the Orionids.

Here’s what those are, as well as when and where you’ll be able to see them.

What is the Orionid meteor shower?

As with all meteor showers, it’s not that the comets are “shooting” towards us.

The Earth sometimes passes through the debris of comets (in this case, comet Halley) in its journey around the sun. This is also the source of spring’s Eta Aquariid meteor shower.

When some of this space rubble enters our atmosphere, it compresses and superheats the air surrounding it. That leads to a glowing “head” and, sometimes, a streaking “tail” that stargazers will recognise as part of a meteor shower.

Fortunately for those who love the show, the Orionids move particularly quickly (about 41 metres a second). That leaves especially bright, long-lasting tails.

Per NASA, they can sometimes remain visible for several seconds and even minutes.

Not just that, but “the Orionids are also framed by some of the brightest stars in the night sky, which lend a spectacular backdrop for these showy meteors”.

All in all, it’s set to be a pretty stunning display.

When will the Orionid meteor shower start?

It’s set to begin on Thursday 2 October 2026, and is expected to last until about 7 November.

But some periods will be brighter and more beautiful than others.

The shower will “peak” on 21 October, though Royal Museums Greenwich explained, “there is a broad maximum lasting about a week roughly centred on that date”.

Where can I see it?

The less light pollution, the better. If you can get away from the city and other bright locations, do.

The broader the view you have of the sky, the more meteors you might see. High points are therefore a good option.

Expect the best viewing conditions, weather-wise, in southern and eastern parts of England. Though Northern Ireland and Scotland might face showery conditions, the skies should be relatively clear between rainfall, too.

You might “struggle” more in Wales, the Midlands and Northern England, the BBC added, due to a slow-moving cloudy weather front.

How can I see the Orionid meteor shower in 2026?

Go outside in the wee hours and get comfortable. Sleeping bags and outdoor chairs can help to keep you warm, and the darker the sky is, the more visible the meteors can be.

You can see these brilliant meteors with the naked eye – no special equipment is needed.

Share Button

Andy Burnham Forced Into Climbdown After Row Over Manchester City Comments

Andy Burnham has been forced to clarify his views on Manchester City after he triggered an angry backlash by saying he was “really concerned” the club’s owners could quit English football.

The prime minister gave his views after City were found guilty of multiple breaches of the Premier League’s financial rules.

Club officials have denied any wrongdoing and are set to appeal against the decision, which was handed down by an independent commission.

If they lose, they face a massive fine and possible relegation from the league.

Asked by the BBC if he was worried the owners could sell the club, Burnham – the former mayor of Greater Manchester – said: “I would be really concerned to lose them.

“They’ve been such a huge partner in the building of modern Manchester. Obviously, the building of Manchester City into the global force that it is.”

Asked if all his dealings with City while he was mayor will stand up to scrutiny, Burnham said: “Oh indeed. I do actually thank the City Football Group and the wider ownership for the money that they didn’t just put into the Etihad and the campus around it but also into the city, but yes of course.”

The PM said there was “a lot at stake … for the football club, for city supporters, for the city of Manchester”.

His comments were condemned by politicians, supporters of other clubs as well as senior figures within football.

Green Party deputy leader Mothin Ali said: “Andy Burnham’s comments are staggering, just one day after saying people should come before profit, he sides with big money over the integrity of a sport that belongs to the people.

“It’s a shame the prime minister appears to agree there should be one rule for the rich and one for everyone else.”

In an attempt to take the sting out of the row, a No.10 spokesman said: “As the prime minister made clear, the initial judgement is serious and there can’t be any suggestion that anyone is above the rules. He also stressed that it is an ongoing independent process.

“It is essential that it is allowed to run its course and the outcome respected. If wrongdoing is established, those responsible should face the appropriate consequences.”

However, the PM was praised by high-profile City fan and Oasis lead singer Liam Gallagher, who posted on X: “There’s only 1 Andy Burnham.”

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Share Button

This giant stick insect fooled scientists for decades

Scientists have identified two previously unrecognized species of large stick insects in Australia, revealing that even in some of the country’s most closely studied environments, new species are still waiting to be found.

A University of Sydney research team reexamined Australian members of the stick insect genus Anchiale and discovered two new species. One produces unusual eggs with a distinctive lidlike structure. The researchers also restored a third species that had gone unrecognized for decades.

Their work shows that insects previously classified as just two species actually represent five separate species. Together, they occur from northern NSW along coastal Queensland and into tropical northern Australia.

Hidden Diversity Among Familiar Insects

Scientists reached these conclusions despite a large amount of existing information about Australian stick insects. More than 1000 citizen science observations have been submitted through iNaturalist and the Atlas of Living Australia, and the insects have also been studied scientifically for decades.

Even so, the researchers say much of Australia’s insect diversity remains undocumented.

Lead author Dr. Braxton Jones of the Aola Richards Sydney Insect Hub at the University of Sydney said the discoveries demonstrate how much scientists still have to learn about insect biodiversity.

“Taxonomy is often a bit like detective work. Even among some of Australia’s most photographed and frequently reported insects, we’re still finding species that have escaped scientific recognition,” said Dr. Jones, a Postdoctoral Research Associate in the Molecular Ecology, Evolution and Phylogenomics Laboratory.

Fun Facts About Stick Insects

  • Many stick insects can reproduce without mating with a male. The process is known as parthenogenesis, in which a female produces eggs that develop into female-only offspring that are clones of herself.
  • Some stick insects defend themselves by spraying chemicals at predators. The spray can irritate the eyes and mouth of an attacker.
  • Australia’s longest stick insect measures around 62cm (the world record is 64cm). Australia has 130 known species, while 3609 species are known worldwide.
  • Stick insects belong to a group called Phasmatodea, a name derived from an ancient Greek word meaning “phantom” or “ghost.” Their remarkable camouflage allows them to blend so effectively into vegetation that they can appear to vanish among leaves and branches.
  • Some species can slowly change color to better match their surroundings. Their appearance can range from green to brown, and some can even resemble lichen as they blend into leaves, bark, and branches.
  • Baby Extatosoma tiaratum stick insects use an especially unusual survival strategy. After hatching, the tiny nymphs have been observed emerging from ant nests while looking and behaving like ants. Their eggs can be carried into ant nests, where they remain dormant for months and receive protection from wasps. After hatching, the young insects use their ant-like color, shape, and behavior to move unnoticed toward the top of a eucalyptus tree.
  • Some stick insects respond to threats by suddenly displaying brightly colored wings, which can startle predators. Certain species can also create a rustling noise with their wings, adding another defensive element to their wing morphology.
  • If a predator catches a stick insect by the leg, some species can deliberately detach the limb and escape. This process is known as autotomy. Young stick insects can regenerate the missing leg during later molts, gradually restoring what was lost.

A Stick Insect Misidentified for Decades

One of the study’s biggest surprises involved a large stick insect that had long been familiar to both scientists and insect enthusiasts.

Researchers combined DNA analysis with museum specimens, field surveys, citizen science observations, and studies of insects raised in captivity. The evidence showed that the insect had been incorrectly identified for decades.

It is now recognized as a separate species called Anchiale robusta.

The findings are published in Austral Entomology.

The researchers also formally described Anchiale mabiensis, a new species found in Queensland’s critically endangered Mabi rainforest on the Atherton Tablelands.

Its eggs contain an unusual structural lid that has not previously been documented in any stick insect or its closest relatives.

Discovery Could Help Forestry and Agriculture

The revised classification may also have practical value.

One stick insect known for occasionally reaching plague-like population levels and stripping leaves from trees was found to represent more than one species. Distinguishing between those species could help researchers and land managers better understand and manage future impacts on forestry and agriculture.

The study also points to another possible new species from Cape York. Researchers believe it may be undescribed, but they need additional specimens before they can confirm its identity.

Dr. Jones said: “These findings demonstrate the importance of protecting threatened ecosystems and documenting Australia’s extraordinary biodiversity before we lose species without us having even discovered them.”

Funding for the research came from the Australian Biological Resources Study, through the National Taxonomy Research Grant of the Commonwealth Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, as well as a CSIRO postgraduate scholarship.

Share Button

New “plant armor” more than triples strawberry yields

A newly developed textile covering helped strawberry plants produce more than three times as much fruit in tunnel field trials, while showing no harmful effects on plant health. Researchers say the technology may also offer a way to reduce water use and reliance on pesticides in strawberry production.

The fabric, called Plant Armor, is designed to be placed directly over strawberry plants. Its three dimensional structure creates a barrier that keeps insects from reaching the plants, while the layered material still allows sunlight, rain, and air to pass through.

In tunnel field tests, strawberries protected by Plant Armor produced yields as much as 3.56 times higher than uncovered plants. The fabric did not reduce light availability or negatively affect relative humidity.

A Fabric That Protects Without Blocking Sunlight

“To produce fruit, plants need sunlight,” said Gabriel Olawuyi, a graduate research assistant at North Carolina State University and lead author of a paper on Plant Armor. “We expected that Plant Armor’s seemingly opaque fabric would lead to an increase in vegetative biomass at the expense of fruiting — because reduced sunlight would trigger a ‘shade-avoidance’ response, making the plant divert energy toward stem and leaf growth rather than fruit production. However, we found the fabric did not impede access to light at all, and fruit production increased significantly.”

Researchers also found that Plant Armor created a steady warming effect throughout the three growing seasons. According to Olawuyi, that extra warmth helped covered plants reach the fruiting stage earlier than plants grown without the textile.

“Plants require a certain amount of accumulated heat, calculated as ‘growing degree-days,’ to progress through developmental stages including fruiting. Our plant cover has proven to enhance these,” Olawuyi said. “The plants were in a condition whereby the warmth they need to go through each phenological stage to their production was given to them optimally, and they produced far more than the uncovered plants.”

Because Plant Armor physically prevents insects from feeding on the plants, Olawuyi said the technology could also reduce the amount of conventional pesticides needed in agricultural fields.

From Military Textiles to Strawberry Fields

The idea behind Plant Armor did not begin with farming. The technology emerged from research focused on making military uniforms more resistant to mosquito bites and improving comfort for soldiers wearing body armor.

That unexpected path from military clothing research to agriculture demonstrates the value of collaboration across scientific fields, said co-author R. Michael Roe, William Neal Reynolds Distinguished Professor at NC State.

“The path to Plant Armor started with trying to make a cloth to go on a soldier’s chest to make body armor more comfortable,” said Roe. “Then, through trial and error, we arrive at a product which could triple the output of strawberry farms here in North Carolina.

“We couldn’t have predicted that when we started. Without all these people here doing research and following the science, we wouldn’t have arrived at this product.”

Study Details and Support

The paper, “Knitted 3-D, Porous Textile Cover to Enhance Strawberry Fruit Production and Prevent Insect Feeding,” is published in the journal Agriculture. Co-authors include James Clothier, Matthew Bertone, Grayson Cave, Reuben Garshong, Andre West, Loganathan Ponnusamy and Clyde Sorenson of NC State University.

This project was supported by a grant from the North Carolina Agricultural Foundation (grant number AG00463770). The work was also supported by the Research Capacity Fund (HATCH), project award no. 02853, from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture. The Plant Armor Gen 2 fabric studied in this paper was patented by North Carolina State University (US Patent No. 11,582,968 B2; 21 February 2023) and is licensed for commercial development by the University. This work was a collaborative project between the NC State College of Natural Resources, Wilson College of Textiles and College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.

Share Button