Andy Burnham Shrugs Off Questions About Harry And Meghan’s UK Security

Andy Burnham has shrugged off queries about how the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will be protected once they return to the UK.

Harry and Meghan moved to the US in 2020 after choosing to step down from their royal duties but will be relocating to a non-royal residence outside of London later this month.

The Duke of Sussex, who is fifth in line to the British throne, lost a legal challenge over how much state-funded security he and his family are entitled to while in Britain last year.

His trip to the UK last month was even put on hold briefly after his request for policy protection was rejected.

The revelation that he is now bringing his wife and two children back to the UK has therefore come as a shock.

When asked how the non-working royals will be protected while in Britain, the prime minister said their security a “private matter”.

“Well, this is a private matter,” he told reporters while on a visit to West Yorkshire. “It’s a matter for for Harry and for Megan, and we wish them well in the moves that they’re making.”

Education secretary Lucy Powell also told LBC: “I think that the vast majority of your listeners will welcome that news and – they obviously are not working royals anymore – and want to come back to this country.

“I assume because we do have great schools, great education, that’s why many people do return to this country and choose this country to bring up their children in.

“And I hope that this is all part of a bigger reconciliation for the family because you know the royal family is very important to this country and to our reputation around the world, and you know I for one think it’s great to have Harry and Meghan and their family back here.”

Harry and Meghan’s children, seven-year-old Prince Archie and five-year-old Princess Lilibet, are in the line of succession behind their father.

They have been enrolled in a British school from September onwards, suggesting the Sussexes intend to be back in the UK for the long-haul.

Harry and his family went to visit his father King Charles in July in Highgrove, though it’s thought their move back to Britain was not discussed.

The monarch was reportedly only told about their decision to relocate on Sunday, though he is said to welcome the idea of seeing his family more in a personal capacity.

Harry and Meghan are expected to continue living as private individuals.

Their return to the UK comes six years after the Sussexes dramatically fell out with the Royal Family and moved across the Atlantic amid heightened press scrutiny.

While the couple’s relationship with Charles and his wife Queen Camilla appears to be on the mend after their July visit, it’s unclear if they have built bridges with the Prince and Princess of Wales.

The King had not see his grandchildren for more than four years prior to the Sussexes’ trip earlier this summer, and the Duke of Sussex previously said security fears had stopped him bringing his family to the UK.

Harry and Meghan have not been seen publicly in the UK since they attended the 2022 funeral of Queen Elizabeth II.

A Home Office spokesperson said decision on the security of royals were taken by the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures.

They said: “The UK government’s protective security system is rigorous and proportionate.

“It is our long-standing policy not to provide detailed information on those arrangements, as doing so could compromise their integrity and affect individuals’ security.”

The Home Office, the Metropolitan Police and the royal household all sit on that executive committee.

They work together to advise the independent chair in making decisions, based on expert risk assessments and in line with government policy.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Share Button

Radio Presenter Trevor Nelson Shares Brain Tumour Diagnosis

DJ and radio presenter Trevor Nelson has disclosed that he has been diagnosed with a brain tumour.

Back in June, Trevor announced he would be taking a step back from his work commitments on Radio 2 and Radio 1Xtra on medical grounds.

“After a routine check-up I was advised to have some follow up tests. As a result, I will be taking some further time off,” he said at the time. “As I’m sure you can appreciate with health issues, it’s important to deal with facts and not speculate.

“So I’m concentrating on getting better, being back to 100% me and to getting back behind the mic and the decks.”

On Thursday afternoon, Trevor shared a video on Instagram, explaining that he’d spent the last month at home recovering from brain surgery.

“A lot of you may have seen the post that I put up at the start of summer saying that I was stepping back from all my work commitments due to illness,” he began. “There’s been a lot of speculation as to what’s wrong with me, I know that much – my phone’s blown up 20 times over with people asking what’s wrong with me.

“Due to the love and positive vibes thousands of you have literally been sending me, I felt that I should at least tell you what was wrong with me, and what happened to me.”

He continued: “I’m not going to go into it all now, and I will probably deep dive into it at a later date, so you can hear the whole crazy story. But I’ll tell you this, I was minding my own business, and then it was discovered that I had a brain tumour.

“As you can imagine, I was shocked, in fact, my world was turned upside down. It was a shock to myself, my close family and friends, and you can imagine, quite literally, my head was all over the place.

“I knew I had to stop work because I couldn’t be that guy on the radio, knowing I had that going on. So affirmative action had to be taken, I was given my choices of what I could do, and a few weeks later, I had a very serious surgery. Thankfully, it went incredibly well, and in the last month, I’ve been at home, recuperating, resting and recovering, and getting some post-op treatment as well.”

Trevor insisted: “I can only tell you the truth, and the truth is, I feel great right now. I feel ready to come back, I feel energised, I feel almost back to myself. Yes, I’ve had a really serious situation, but I’ve come out the other side at this point. I feel great, I feel raring to go, and I feel in good health.

“I’m playing golf, I’m doing a bit of gym, I’m doing all the things that I normally used to do, bar being on the radio and doing gigs – so let’s get that straight, and let’s get that back to normal as soon as possible. So please, don’t worry about me. I’m on the mend, I really am.”

Trevor is currently a weekend presenter on Radio 2, and hosted a Sunday morning show on 1Xtra until his recent health issues.

Radio 2’s official Instagram account shared a message under Trevor’s post, which read: “Sending you so much love Trevor! Can’t wait to have you back.”

His former BBC colleague Clara Amfo said: “Thank God for your brilliant surgeons, you’re meant to be here UT! Love you.”

“So good to see your face Trevor and learn that you’re doing well. Huge healing love to you wonderful man,” wrote Zoe Ball, while Jack Saunders also commented: “So glad you’re feeling better [and] more like yourself mate. We need you. Sending all the love and can’t wait to have you back doing what you do best!”

Share Button

‘Dangerous And Unnecessary’: Labour Slammed For Giving Asylum Seekers Pamphlets On Sexual Consent

The government has been slammed for giving asylum seekers pamphlets on behaviour and expectations in the UK around sexual consent.

The Home Office has published a guide for those arriving in Britain telling them not to rape or sexually harass people, including partners and children.

The documents also tell refugees that women are allowed to “earn their own money” and “make their own decisions about their lives”.

The guidance, which appears to be aimed at men, claims people in the UK are expected not to make sexual remarks about someone “even if you think it is a compliment”.

It also urges asylum seekers not to make “kissing sounds” at someone, follow someone around or “block their path”, make rude or offensive gestures or “verbally abuse someone because of their gender, religion or how they look”.

The pamphlets warn asylum seekers they could end up in trouble with the authorities, lose their accommodation or face issues with their asylum claim if they are found to have broken the law.

The guidance is part of a nine-page document called, “Understanding behaviours and expectations in the UK: a guide for asylum seekers”.

Green peer Jenny Jones told Sky News: “This is a dangerous and unnecessary move by the Home Office which feeds into right wing tropes, and fuels the misinformation around migrants and people seeking asylum which has resulted in violent protests outside places where migrants are being housed, and attacks on migrants themselves.

Shabana Mahmood needs to apologise for this grave error of judgement and take responsibility for any future consequences.

“We support consent education, but it needs to be universal. There is no evidence violence against women and girls is higher amongst migrants and people seeking asylum than among the general population.

“CPS research found that 30% of people do not recognise that being married or in a relationship means consent cannot be assumed, so why are only asylum seekers being told this is wrong?”

Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp also slammed the brochures, saying: “Instead of trying to train these mainly young, male illegal immigrants to behave in a civilised way towards women, they should be deported.”

Reform UK’s home affairs spokesperson Zia Yusuf said the guidance was a “disgrace”.

Prime minister Andy Burnham defended the brochures on Wednesday afternoon, telling broadcasters: “As a government we have a very clear principle. If you break UK law, you will be removed from the country.

“I’m currently working to ensure that foreign national offenders who can be removed from the prison system are removed from that system.”

He added: “So it follows that if we’re taking this approach it’s made explicitly clear what the UK law is and what the societal norms of the UK are and that’s why this approach is being taken now.”

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Share Button

Schizophrenia’s lost brain connections follow a surprising pattern

Researchers, including a Rutgers professor, have gained a clearer view of the biological changes associated with schizophrenia by directly measuring synaptic connections in the living human brain. The team used specialized positron emission tomography (PET) imaging to examine these crucial points of communication between brain cells.

The study, published in Molecular Psychiatry, was led by senior authors Avram Holmes, associate professor of psychiatry at Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and core faculty member of the Center for Advanced Human Brain Imaging Research within the Rutgers Brain Health Institute, and Rajiv Radhakrishnan, associate professor of psychiatry and radiology and biomedical imaging at Yale University. First author Sidhant Chopra, formerly a postdoctoral fellow in the Holmes Lab, is a McKenzie Research Fellow at Orygen, Australia’s Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, and the University of Melbourne in Australia.

Measuring the Brain’s Synaptic Connections

Synapses are tiny junctions that allow brain cells to communicate with one another across neural circuits. Problems involving these connections are believed to play a role in the cognitive and emotional symptoms of schizophrenia. Until now, however, scientists have had a limited understanding of exactly where synaptic loss occurs in the brains of living people because conventional imaging methods such as magnetic resonance imaging cannot specifically measure synapses.

The research involved 122 people, including 29 diagnosed with schizophrenia, making it one of the largest synaptic density PET imaging studies conducted so far. Compared with healthy participants, people with schizophrenia showed a pronounced and widespread reduction in synaptic connections across several parts of the brain. These included frontal and temporal regions as well as areas involved in memory and emotion. The loss was also considerably greater on the left side of the brain than on the right.

Researchers found that this synaptic pattern did not match the changes in brain volume typically seen with standard MRI scans. That distinction suggests synaptic loss and changes in brain volume may reflect separate biological processes rather than two imaging methods capturing the same underlying change.

A Molecular Pattern Behind Synaptic Loss

The team also discovered that the brain regions showing the greatest synaptic losses tended to contain high concentrations of receptors for important neurotransmitters, including serotonin, gamma-aminobutyric acid and glutamate. The finding suggests that the molecular characteristics of individual brain regions may influence how vulnerable they are to changes associated with schizophrenia.

To explore how synaptic loss might move through the brain, the researchers used computer simulations based on the brain’s structural connections. Their modeling identified an area in the left frontal lobe as a likely starting point from which synaptic loss could spread into connected regions.

“These findings suggest that in schizophrenia, synaptic loss is not random,” Chopra said. “Rather, it follows the brain’s molecular and connectivity architecture, which could eventually help identify where and how to intervene.”

“This detailed mapping of synaptic vulnerability could eventually help identify where and how to intervene to preserve or restore brain function, such as emerging therapies to prevent and regrow synapses,” Holmes added.

Toward More Precise Schizophrenia Treatments

The researchers said future work will build on these results by investigating how synaptic loss changes over time and how it responds to clinical treatments. A better understanding of that progression could ultimately help researchers develop more precise and personalized approaches to schizophrenia care.

Share Button

The “Asian water tower” is losing 24 billion tonnes of groundwater every year

Groundwater reserves beneath High Mountain Asia (HMA), often called the “Asian Water Tower,” are shrinking at an alarming pace, according to a new satellite-based study. The region provides water that supports farming, cities, and ecosystems across more than a dozen downstream countries, making it a critical resource for hundreds of millions of people. Researchers estimate that groundwater storage is declining by about 24.2 billion tonnes each year.

The research was led by Prof. Shudong Wang of the Aerospace Information Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (AIRCAS). The team sought to overcome two major obstacles to understanding groundwater in the region: limited on-the-ground data and the extremely complex mountainous landscape. The findings were recently published in Environmental Research Letters.

AI and Satellites Reveal Two Decades of Change

To build a clearer picture of what is happening underground, the researchers created an artificial intelligence (AI) powered assessment model that combines observations from multiple satellites, Earth system modeling, and explainable AI.

Using this approach, they reconstructed about 20 years of groundwater storage (GWS) changes across High Mountain Asia. The system also helped identify the main forces driving those changes and allowed the researchers to explore how groundwater risks could develop under future scenarios.

The results show that roughly two-thirds of HMA experienced declining groundwater storage between 2003 and 2020. The largest losses occurred in heavily populated downstream basins where irrigation demands are high, including the Ganges-Brahmaputra, Indus and Amu Darya basins. Some inland areas at higher elevations, however, experienced localized increases in groundwater storage.

Climate and Human Water Use Drive the Decline

Climate-related forces explain nearly half of the observed variation in GWS, with changes involving the cryosphere playing an especially important role.

At the same time, human withdrawals of groundwater have become an increasingly significant source of depletion, particularly in downstream agricultural regions that rely heavily on irrigation. The influence of human water use became even more pronounced after 2010.

Researchers also project that groundwater losses will continue if current patterns of water use remain in place. In some locations, increased glacier melt could temporarily reduce the pace of groundwater decline around the 2060s. But this “buffer effect” cannot continue indefinitely and is expected to be followed by faster losses.

If present water use patterns do not change, groundwater depletion could accelerate further, increasing the threat to agricultural areas downstream that depend on these reserves.

A New Way to Track Groundwater in Mountain Regions

For the analysis, the researchers used a framework guided by existing scientific knowledge while also drawing on large amounts of observational data. Information from multiple satellite sensors was used to estimate GWS changes over the past 20 years.

The framework incorporates a lightweight Transformer architecture designed to account for hydrological memory and delayed effects within mountainous catchments. The researchers also used explainable machine learning methods to determine the physical factors associated with the groundwater changes identified by the system.

To test the reliability of the results, the team compared its findings with thousands of measurements from groundwater wells as well as independent datasets. Those comparisons provided additional support for the study’s conclusions.

By combining remote sensing observations, established hydrological knowledge, and interpretable AI methods, the framework helps address long-standing difficulties in studying High Mountain Asia, including rugged terrain and incomplete information about human water use.

The research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China and the Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC).

Share Button

This total solar eclipse looked strangely golden — here’s why

Last week’s total solar eclipse offered more than a spectacular view. It also produced an unusual atmospheric effect that gave the Sun’s outer atmosphere a striking golden appearance.

During a total solar eclipse, the Moon completely blocks the bright disk of the Sun, making the much fainter solar corona visible. The corona is the Sun’s extremely hot outer atmosphere, and during most eclipses it appears white or silvery. Some people watching last week’s eclipse did see this familiar pearly color. In Spain, however, observers were treated to something different. The corona took on an unusually rich golden hue.

Why the Eclipse Looked Golden

The timing of the eclipse played an important role. In Spain, totality occurred while the setting Sun was already close to the horizon. When the Sun sits that low in the sky, its light must travel through much more of Earth’s atmosphere before reaching an observer.

Along that longer path, molecules in the air scatter shorter wavelengths of visible light, especially blue. This is the same basic process that helps make sunsets appear orange and red. With more blue light removed, the warmer colors that remain become much more noticeable.

Conditions that day added another layer to the effect. An unusually large amount of smoke in the air from nearby forest fires acted like an additional atmospheric filter. Smoke particles scattered even more of the remaining blue wavelengths, intensifying the golden tones in the visible light surrounding the eclipsed Sun.

A Pink Solar Prominence Stood Out

The remarkable featured image was created using multiple exposures and HDR processing. HDR, or high dynamic range imaging, combines exposures with different brightness levels so that both very bright and very faint details can be preserved in a single image. The photograph was captured last week from Benavente, Spain.

Not everything around the Sun was transformed into gold. A large prominence remained visible along the Sun’s left edge. Solar prominences are enormous structures of glowing plasma that extend outward from the Sun’s surface and are often shaped by powerful magnetic fields.

This prominence emitted strongly in light associated with hydrogen, allowing its original bright pink color to survive despite the atmospheric filtering. Against the unusually golden corona, the vivid pink structure made an already rare eclipse scene even more striking.

Share Button

‘I’d love a normal life, but being a 17-year-old carer means sacrifices’

Young carers face huge disadvantages growing up – one teenager explains what life is like.

Share Button

Weekly type 2 diabetes jab could replace daily injections

Hundreds of thousands of people with type 2 diabetes could get access to a new weekly insulin jab to replace daily injections.

Share Button

Vapes could lead to health harms in children, doctors warn

A Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health has published a report with concerns vaping is a gateway to smoking

Share Button

Channel 4’s Great ADHD Myth Documentary Dramatically Divides Viewers

A documentary questioning whether attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a genuine condition or a social construct has aired on Channel 4 – and it’s proven predictably divisive.

The show, titled The Great ADHD Myth?, has prompted a wave of responses online from doctors, charities and people with the disorder who are concerned it will contribute to stigma surrounding the condition.

A reactionary survey by the charity ADHD UK in the wake of the documentary revealed that (at the time of writing), of 1,566 people who watched the show, 92% believe it has increased stigma surrounding ADHD, while 93% do not believe the show was fair in its representation of the condition.

ADHD UK’s CEO and co-founder, Henry Shelford, told HuffPost UK: “We are shocked by this programme. The fact it got commissioned at all speaks to the stigma around ADHD – a stigma that is now likely to get worse because of this show.”

The charity had previously penned an open letter to Channel 4 urging it to make a series of changes to the documentary before its release, including a review of the title and for the broadcaster to “make clear on screen where contributors’ views sit relative to mainstream clinical consensus”.

What was Channel 4’s ADHD documentary about?

The documentary followed NHS psychiatrist and Daily Mail columnist, Dr Max Pemberton, as he spoke to medical experts who questioned the conventional narrative around ADHD.

One such expert, Dr Iona Heath, the former president of the Royal College of General Practitioners, said: “It’s certainly not a medical condition as far as I’m concerned.” Another child psychiatrist said: “In 100 years’ time people are going to wonder, ‘How could we be so gullible?’”

The show posed a number of questions including whether ADHD is a disorder or social construct, how it should be treated (including whether diet and lifestyle changes could help), whether medication is the right approach and who benefits from increasing diagnoses.

Dr Pemberton – who remains certain he doesn’t have ADHD – underwent a private assessment (costing £1,200) and was diagnosed with combined ADHD and a prescription for medication.

The documentary also followed a family who wanted to see whether holistic lifestyle changes could eliminate their 10-year-old son’s use of ADHD medication. The pills “take my fun-ness away”, he said, however the programme noted at the end he did go back on them.

ADHD UK’s survey found 80% of those surveyed said it wasn’t “responsible” for a broadcaster to film a 10-year-old stopping his ADHD medication for television.

In response, Channel 4 told HuffPost UK: “The welfare of the boy and his family were of paramount importance both before, during and after the production process. An independent doctor, his GP, and a health and safety company were consulted.

“Advice was also taken from three independent psychiatrists on the medication break. This programme was produced in compliance with the Ofcom Broadcasting Code.”

The Times’ review of the show called its arguments “convincing, or at least the start of a necessary discussion”, although they did note “there was no real counter-argument offered to the idea of ADHD as a ‘myth’”.

Meanwhile the Guardian said Dr Pemberton “answers his questions convincingly”, highlighting the remedies proposed at the end, such as changing diet, screen and activity levels first, adapting schools to children’s needs, and making medication the last resort “seem neither radical nor uncompassionate”.

Both publications gave the doc four stars.

The show sparked backlash from people with ADHD

The NHS says ADHD is a “complex neurodevelopmental disorder, which starts in childhood and often persists into adulthood” and “is associated with significant impairment”. It’s also recognised by the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).

It is marked by a persistent pattern (at least six months) of inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity that has a direct negative impact in more than one setting – ie. home, school, work – on academic, occupational, or social functioning.

Shelford, who has ADHD, said the latest Channel 4 documentary “is a travesty in its missed opportunity to help slay myths around ADHD; instead, it has added to them”.

He said ADHD “can be extraordinarily tough” and pointed to UCL-led research which showed UK adults with diagnosed ADHD have a shorter life expectancy. There was a reduction in life expectancy for men with diagnosed ADHD of between 4.5 and nine years, and between 6.5 and 11 years for women.

“Our failure to support people with ADHD should be a national scandal – instead we’re getting TV shows undermining the disorder,” he said.

“We have already complained to Ofcom and will be following up with a more detailed complaint.” The charity has also encouraged others to make complaints to the regulator.

“We are worried that this will cost lives by putting people in need off getting an ADHD assessment and from getting support,” added Shelford.

Others were quick to share their thoughts on the controversial documentary on social media after it aired.

Clinical psychologist Dr Emily Compton-Smith wrote on Instagram: “We should absolutely be able to discuss diagnosis, and where things could be improved.”

That said, she was “troubled” by “how one-sided the programme felt,” she continued, adding that “what felt missing … was the voice of the people actually living it”.

She also aired concerns that “many people will watch it and come away more sceptical of ADHD, while people with ADHD will once again be left feeling like they need to justify themselves”.

Adam Dance, the Liberal Democrat MP for Yeovil, who also has ADHD, shared a cross-party letter which he’d sent to Channel 4, saying he is “deeply concerned by the framing and language used to promote the documentary and by the potential consequences for people with ADHD and their families”.

Meanwhile others praised the show as “fantastic” and “inspirational”.

One in five (20%) people who watched the show and responded to ADHD UK’s survey said the programme had caused them ‘severe’ distress, with 38% saying it caused ‘significant’ distress.

Share Button