Farage Accused of ‘Parroting Putin’ For Suggesting Ukraine Give Up Crimea For Peace

Nigel Farage has been accused of “parroting Putin” after he appeared to suggest Ukraine should give up Crimea to end its war with Russia.

The Reform UK leader told the BBC that both sides in the conflict need to make “concessions” as part of any peace deal.

Crimea has been under Russian control said it was annexed by Moscow in 2014.

In a speech in February marking the 11th anniversary of that invasion, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy said: “Ukraine’s territorial integrity, sovereignty, and security are not and will not be open for any compromises.”

But appearing on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, Farage said: “The real point here is both sides have to make concessions. I’m not going to say what I think should be in those concessions. Clearly, at the heart of it is Crimea.”

Asked whether Ukraine “should be willing to compromise on Crimea”, Farage replied: “That’s at the heart of it.

“This is an attritional war, something like one million battle casualties so far. Either it goes on for year after year after year or there is a deal.”

A Conservative Party spokesman said: “Yet again Nigel Farage can’t help himself but parrot Putin talking points when touring the TV studios.

“Like Jeremy Corbyn, Nigel Farage faces both ways on Russia. Reform will always put their own self-interest ahead of our national interest. The Conservative Party will always stand with Ukraine.”

Share Button

Volodymyr Zelenskyy Blames ‘Filthy Scum’ After Dozens Of Civilians Killed In Russian Attack

Volodymyr Zelenskyy has attacked the “filthy scum” responsible for a Russian missile attack which left dozens of Ukrainian civilians dead and many more injured.

The strike took place in Sumy in the north-east of the country as worshippers made their way to church to mark Palm Sunday.

Ukraine’s foreign minister, Andrii Sybiha, said: “Launching such an attack on a major Christian holiday is absolute evil.”

It is a further blow to Donald Trump’s hopes of securing an end to the conflict, which began with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine more than three years ago.

According to Ukrainian officials, at least 31 people – including two children – were killed, with more than 84 injured, of whom 10 were children.

In a post on X, the Ukrainian president condemned the “horrific” attack.

He said: “Russian missiles hit an ordinary city street, ordinary life – residential buildings, educational institutions, cars on the street. And that’s on the day when people go to church – Palm Sunday, the feast of the Lord’s Entry into Jerusalem.

“According to preliminary information, dozens of civilians were killed and wounded. Only filthy scum can act like this – taking the lives of ordinary people.”

Zelenskyy called on the world to “respond firmly” to the latest Russian aggression.

“The United States, Europe, everyone in the world who wants this war and these killings to end,” he said. “Russia wants exactly this kind of terror and is dragging this war out.

“Without pressure on Russia, peace is impossible. Talks have never stopped ballistic missiles and aerial bombs. What’s needed is an attitude toward Russia that a terrorist deserves.”

Two men comfort each other as Ukrainian police psychologists provide assistance to local residents following the missile attack.
Two men comfort each other as Ukrainian police psychologists provide assistance to local residents following the missile attack.

OLEG VORONENKO via AFP via Getty Images

In a later post, Zelenskyy said: “It is crucial that the world does not stay silent or indifferent. Russian strikes deserve nothing but condemnation.

“There must be pressure on Russia to end the war and guarantee security for people. Without truly strong pressure, without sufficient support for Ukraine, Russia will continue dragging this war out.

“It’s now the second month that Putin has been ignoring the US proposal for a full and unconditional ceasefire. Unfortunately, there in Moscow they are convinced they can keep killing with impunity. Action is needed to change this situation.”

UK politicians united to condemn the latest Russian atrocity.

Keir Starmer said: “I’m appalled at Russia’s horrific attacks on civilians in Sumy and my thoughts are with the victims and their loved ones at this tragic time.

“President Zelenskyy has shown his commitment to peace. Putin must now agree to a full and immediate ceasefire without conditions.”

Shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge said it was “an utterly shocking attack”.

“This is a reminder of the price innocent Ukrainians – including children – are paying for Putin’s unprovoked aggression every single day. It also underlines why there should be no ambiguity whatsoever who the aggressor is.”

Share Button

Putin’s Army Has Significantly Changed Pace On The Frontline Throughout 2025, UK Says

Vladimir Putin’s army has slowed down significantly with its territorial gains in Ukraine over the last few months, according to the UK.

Russia still occupies around a fifth of Ukrainian land, but is continuing to push forward and try to seize more territory.

Putin has even issued his largest conscription call yet to bolster his army, all while Donald Trump is trying to negotiate a peace deal.

However, Russia is not actually having that much success on the frontline, according to the British Ministry of Defence (MoD).

In its latest social media update on the war, the MoD said: “Russian territorial gains in Ukraine have decreased during the first quarter of 2025, with Russian forces highly likely seizing only 143 sq km of Ukrainian territory in March 2025, an average of less than 5 square kilometres per day.”

The British officials traced this decreased progress back to the end of last year.

“Russia’s rate of advance has dropped month by month since November 2024, when its forces seized more than 700 sq km,” the MoD said.

“Most of the advances by Russian forces in March 2025 were in central Donetsk oblast, but Russia not did not improve its operational position.”

And, according to the intelligence officers, Ukraine is successfully pushing some of the Russian forces back.

“Ukrainian forces also carried out tactical counter-attacks, reversing some of Russia’s gains around Pokrovsk,” they said.

“The level of Russian ground attacks on several axes was reduced through much of March 2025.

“These began to increase towards the end of the month but have not resulted in a higher rate of advance.”

It’s worth noting Russia’s casualty rate has also reached around 900,000 – wounded or dead – since Putin invaded Ukraine back in 2022, according to the MoD.

But, as Volodymyr Zelenskyy warned over the weekend, Russia is still launching daily air strikes on Ukraine.

The MoD’s update comes after one of Putin’s ministers spurned the US proposals for a peace plan.

Russian deputy foreign minister Sergei Ryabkov told the media that “there is no place for our main demand” in the American proposals, and so Moscow “cannot accept” such a plan.

Trump has been pushing for a quick resolution to the Ukraine war, even if it means settling on Russia’s terms.

The US president did manage to secure partial ceasefires in the Black Sea and against Ukrainian energy infrastructure – but both sides now claim that brief truce has already been broken.

US secretary of state Marco Rubio said on Friday that the world will know “in a matter of weeks” if Russia is “serious about peace or not”.

Share Button

Putin’s Ambassador Has Taken Trolling To The Next Level With Bizarre Jibe At Europe

Europe is trying to “occupy” Ukraine by offering to send peacekeeping troops to the war-torn country, according to a Russian diplomat.

UK prime minister Keir Starmer has offered to put British boots on the ground to support Kyiv if Russia agrees to the US’s peace plans – and as long as there is an American security guarantee.

Some EU countries and Nato allies have already indicated they would join this plan, as part of Starmer’s “coalition of the willing”.

Moscow has not agreed to a permanent truce yet, nor has Donald Trump agreed to provide a security backstop to a peacekeeping plan, so any such plan is still a long way off.

But Rodion Miroshnik – Putin’s so-called “ambassador-at-large” for Ukraine’s alleged “crimes” – attempted to cast doubt on the offer to send a “reassurance force” on Wednesday.

According to the Russian state news agency TASS, Miroshnik said: “The Europeans have announced a project to build a reassurance force that, according to the organisers, will be sent to Ukraine after a peace agreement is signed.

“This could, in fact, be viewed as a blatant occupation of Ukraine by Europe.”

It was Vladimir Putin who invaded Ukraine in 2022 and who continues to occupy a fifth of its sovereign territory.

Moscow has even claimed Ukraine would have to formally cede that occupied land in any permanent truce.

But Miroshnik still bizarrely alleged Europe wants to “take control over [Ukraine’s] political regime militarily while retaining external governance of this land regardless of how negotiations may end.”

Ukraine has actually welcomed any physical support from its allies, and asked for at least 200,000 troops to deter any future Russian aggression.

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said this week that Kyiv was meeting with several countries “who are ready to deploy a contingent in one form or another”.

Share Button

North Korea Has Suffered More Than 5,000 Casualties Fighting For Russia In Ukraine, UK Says

North Korea has suffered more than 5,000 casualties in the Ukraine war, according to UK intelligence.

Around one-third of them have been killed in action while fighting for Russia, the Ministry of Defence said in its latest update on the conflict.

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un sent around 11,000 fighters to help Russia last November.

They have been fighting in Kursk, the Russian territory invaded by Ukraine in a surprise move last year.

The MoD said: “As of March 2025, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) forces had highly likely sustained over 5,000 casualties in offensive combat operations against Ukrainian forces in the Russian oblast of Kursk, with approximately a third of the casualties killed in action.”

Although the Russian and North Korean troops have gained territory in recent weeks, the MoD said Ukraine still has “at least a foothold” in the region.

The update comes amid ongoing attempts by the US to broker a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine in a bid to end the war, which began in 2022.

Share Button

European Leaders Slap Down Putin’s Bid To Get Sanctions Lifted With A Message To Trump

Keir Starmer and his European allies slapped down the idea of lifting sanctions against Russia today and sent a clear message to Donald Trump.

The prime minister’s group of around 30 nations prepared to defend Ukraine after the war ends – known as the “coalition of the willing” – met in Paris on Thursday.

It came after Russian president Vladimir Putin said he would only agree to a US-brokered peace deal with Ukraine if economic penalties imposed on Moscow were dropped.

While the White House has said it will “evaluate” the Kremlin’s suggestions, European leaders flat-out rejected it – and suggested hiking up the sanctions instead.

Speaking alongside Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who has pushed for sanctions to be increased, Starmer accused Putin of “playing games” and “filibustering”.

He said: ”[There is] complete clarity that now is not the time for lifting of sanctions.

“Quite the contrary, what we discussed is how we can increase sanctions to support the US initiative, to bring Russia to the table through further pressure from this group of countries.”

Starmer also said a peace deal should happen soon, noting: “It means increasing the economic pressure on Russia, accelerating new tougher sanctions, bearing down on Russia’s energy revenues, and working together to make this pressure count.”

French president Emmanuel Macron told a press conference that they “unanimously” agreed sanctions should not be lifted against Russia until “peace has clearly been established”.

Similarly, German chancellor Olaf Scholz said stopping sanctions would be a “serious mistake”.

He added: “It makes no sense to end the sanctions until peace has actually been achieved, and unfortunately we are still a long way from that, as you can see.”

The US announced this week that both Russia and Ukraine had agreed to end fighting in the Black Sea.

But Moscow later said it would only implement the deal if some sanctions imposed on Russian banks and exports are lifted.

US secretary of state Marco Rubio then told reporters the US is “going to evaluate” Russia’s terms.

The Trump official said they will be “sitting down, going through proposals, getting their impressions of the conversations, so we can more fully understand what the Russian position is, or what their ask is in exchange.”

The remark was a U-turn from just three weeks ago, when Trump used the threat of further sanctions to pressure Russia to the negotiation table.

Starmer set up the “coalition of the willing” earlier this month after the Trump administration signalled it wanted a quick resolution to the Ukraine war, even if that meant settling on Putin’s terms.

Starmer told the press on Thursday that the coalition has a “consensus” now which is “stronger and broader than it’s ever been”.

He said military chiefs from the UK, France and Germany will meet with their counterparts from other nations to look at how they could put British boots on the ground in Ukraine to deter further Russian aggression in the event of a peace deal.

But he reiterated that “this will require the engagement and support of the United States”.

Starmer also dismissed Russia’s warnings against triggering a direct conflict with Nato, saying: “In terms of what Russia says, we know what Russia wants, it wants a defenceless Ukraine.

“So it doesn’t surprise me that Russia is saying that their position is Ukraine shouldn’t have any capability of its own, or any assistance or help from anybody else, that rather gives away their opening stance on this and that can’t guide us in our response.”

Share Button

Volodymyr Zelenskyy Defends His Stance During Oval Office Clash With Trump

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is speaking about his historic Oval Office clash with US President Donald Trump, defending his decision to speak up for his country at a critical juncture in its war against Russia.

The two leaders sparred inside the White House in front of the whole world last month with Trump accusing his Ukrainian counterpart of “gambling with World War III” for arguing that Russian President Vladimir Putin can’t be trusted. The episode led to a temporary pause in US aid and intelligence sharing with the country.

In an interview with Time released on Monday, Zelenskyy addressed the fact that Ukrainians rallied around him after his tense exchange with Trump rather than blame him for the diplomatic failure three years into the war.

Zelenskyy explained that Ukrainians “are very emotional, and when it comes to our sense of dignity, freedom, democracy, our people rise up and unite,” noting that his country expected the Trump administration to show that the U.S. still sees Kyiv as an ally.

“But in that moment there was the sense of not being allies, or not taking the position of an ally,” he said. “In that conversation, I was defending the dignity of Ukraine.”

At the infamous White House meeting, the Ukrainian leader said he planned to gift Trump the championship belt of heavyweight world champion Oleksandr Usyk. However, Zelenskyy chose to start out by showing Trump images depicting how badly Russia has treated Ukrainian prisoners of war.

“That’s tough stuff,” Trump said looking at the photos.

In his interview with Time, Zelenskyy defended his choice to give Trump the images, adding that he was hoping to appeal to the president’s humanity.

“What I wanted to show were my values,” Zelenskyy said. “But then, well, the conversation went in another direction.”

After the meeting went off the rails, Zelenskyy left the White House early and never got the chance to give Trump the belt. However, Time reported that a White House staffer found the gift in the Oval Office and placed it in Trump’s dining room.

Since then, Russia and Ukraine have agreed in principle to a limited ceasefire after Putin rejected a US proposal for an unconditional ceasefire which was approved by Kyiv. A US delegation on Monday met with Russian officials in Saudi Arabia a day after holding a separate meeting with their Ukrainian counterparts to discuss the implementation of that agreement.

Meanwhile, White House envoy Steve Witkoff told Tucker Carlson Putin “has got huge respect” for Trump, suggesting that Zelenskyy made a mistake by crossing Trump when he visited the White House.

“You saw what happened in the Oval Office with Zelenskyy and the president, right?” Witkoff said in an interview released on Friday. “Disrespecting him is not a healthy way to have a good relationship.”

“Hopefully we’ll chalk it up to a misunderstanding and we’ll get to a peace solution here,” he continued.

Zelenskyy also spoke out against granting Moscow major concessions with no reciprocation, citing Trump’s previous statement that Russia should rejoin the Group of 7 following its annexation of Crimea in 2014.

“That’s a big compromise,” Zelensky told Time. “Imagine releasing Hitler from his political isolation.”

Share Button

Trump’s Envoy Had An Eyebrow-Raising Reply To Claims Putin Already Breached Ceasefire Plan

Donald Trump’s envoy has dismissed claims from Ukraine that Vladimir Putin had already breached terms of a partial ceasefire deal overnight.

The US president said on Tuesday that he had managed to persuade his Russian counterpart to agree to halt all strikes on “energy and infrastructure” in Ukraine for 30 days, in what he described as a major step towards peace.

But the Kremlin’s readout of the call was worded slightly differently, saying Moscow had only agreed to a temporary ceasefire on “energy infrastructure”.

Hours later, president Volodymyr Zelenskyy said there had been direct strikes on civilian infrastructure across Ukraine yet again.

European leaders quickly condemned Russia for breaching the terms of the agreement already, but it seems the White House was not so worried.

Steve Witkoff, Trump’s special envoy, told Bloomberg TV he had it on “good information” that Putin had told Russian forces not to strike Ukrainian energy infrastructure within 10 minutes of his call to Trump.

Witkoff said: “Putin issued an order within 10 minutes of his call with the president directing Russian forces not to be attacking any Ukrainian energy infrastructure.

“Any attacks that happened last night would have happened before that order was given.

“In fact, the Russians tell me this morning that seven of their drones were on their way when President Putin issued his order and they were shot down by Russian forces.”

He continued: “So I tend to believe that President Putin is operating in good faith. He said that he was going to be operating in good faith to the President yesterday, and I take him at his word.”

Russia has also accused Ukraine of breaching the truce, saying its defence ministry destroyed 57 Ukrainian drones overnight.

Witkoff then praised the relationship between Putin and Trump, saying he expected to pair to meet soon.

He said: “You know, I can’t speak for them, but my best bet would be that it’s likely to happen. They have a great rapport together. They had a great rapport in the first Trump administration.

“It was on display yesterday. This was really a very positive, very proactive, outcome oriented call, and that’s who President Trump is. He’s there to get to the goal line. And we did a we went a long way yesterday to doing that.”

The envoy’s comments come as Trump and Zelenskyy were having a scheduled phone call about ending the Ukraine war on Wednesday.

Their relationship has been far less “positive” than Trump and Putin’s, especially after the US president chastised Zelenskyy in the Oval Office over his supposed lack of gratitude for America’s support throughout the war.

Trump even withheld military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine until Kyiv agreed to a 30-day ceasefire and a mineral-sharing deal with the States as a form of repayment for wartime support.

Although Putin ordered the full-blown invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Trump has not asked the aggressor to make any concessions in the name of peace.

But Trump’s national security adviser Mike Waltz has suggested Ukraine may have to do “some type of territory-for-future-security guarantees” for the country’s future – and a “permanent pathway into Nato is incredibly unlikely”.

Meanwhile, Russian troops continue to advance in eastern Ukraine.

Share Button

Susanna Reid Pinpoints 1 Thing That Could Fuel Voter Anger At Keir Starmer

Susanna Reid has warned Keir Starmer that he risks a voter backlash by cutting benefits while boosting defence spending.

The prime minister has confirmed that the military budget will increase from 2.3% to 2.5% of national income from 2027 amid mounting tensions over the war in Ukraine, paid for my slashing the amount spent on international aid.

Work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall will also unveil plans to cut the welfare bill by up to £6 billion on Tuesday.

But on the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg this morning, Reid said those policy decisions could land the PM in a fresh political crisis.

The Good Morning Britain presenter said: “There’s no doubt that [Keir Starmer] has developed a reputation as somebody who can operate very effectively on the international stage.

“But the thing is, if you ask people on the doorsteps, of course they want to back Ukraine but at what price?

“If the things that he’s flexing his muscles over at home – be it benefits or Personal Independence Payments for people – if it looks like he’s using cuts to welfare to pay for war, I’m not sure that’s going to be popular at all.”

Kuenssberg had earlier asked health secretary Wes Streeting: “As a Labour politician, did you get into politics in order to take money from some of the poorest and most vulnerable people in society?”

He replied: “We don’t want to take money from the poorest in society, we want to support people who are the poorest and most vulnerable to make sure they’ve got dignity, independence and great quality of life.”

Share Button

I Left My Old Life Behind To Fight For Ukraine. Here’s What Trump Isn’t Telling You

Before the war, I was a printer in Kyiv. I had travelled the world, met my wife and started a small business making advertising materials and T-shirts. Like many others, I had plans for the future and dreams of a peaceful life.

Now, I serve in the Ukrainian army — not because I am choosing war but because the violence came to my doorstep three years ago. Since Russia began its campaign to control our country, I have had no choice but to stand and defend my home, my people and our freedom. I want to share what the invasion has taught me about the value of freedom because it is essential to peace.

When I think about peace, I think about my family and how it has grown. Recently, my wife and I welcomed twin daughters into this world. But instead of looking forward to their first steps or first words, I find myself asking, “Will they grow up free, or in an occupied land where everything Ukrainian is erased?”

At the same time, I hear US thought leaders like Elon Musk ask what Ukrainians are fighting and dying for. After three years of war — a war that has killed our friends, injured me and threatened my family — hearing such words is unbearable.

The answer to Musk’s question is simple: We are fighting for our right to exist as a nation.

I used to think this answer was American in principle, and in the spring of 2022, most Americans stood with us. We couldn’t have survived this long without the United States’ support. I literally owe my life to it — commanding a Bradley infantry fighting vehicle supplied by the US has saved me more times than I can count.

The author in front of his Bradley.
The author in front of his Bradley.

Courtesy of Sergii Gavryliuk

Between the man-made horrors of the modern battlefield, mine explosions and drone strikes, thousands of Ukrainian soldiers have been pulled from combat alive thanks to American equipment, training and aid. Your country’s support doesn’t just help us liberate our homes — it keeps us alive and able to return to them.

But since Donald Trump has come back into office, everything has changed. Watching his meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Oval Office on February 28 made one thing clear: Trump is determined to end the war at any cost, without any concern for what happens next or the destruction it may cause to my people.

It appears the president of the United States has a different understanding of peace than we Ukrainians do, and he doesn’t care what our country looks like the day after his deal goes through because he simply wants to be the man who ended the war.

He speaks about caring for Ukrainian soldiers, but he recently blocked critical aid to Ukraine, and this led to our army being less able to defend itself as the casualties continued to mount.

“A rushed ceasefire, driven by political expediency, will not bring stability. It will only plant the seeds of an even greater war.”

One soldier who was killed was a friend of mine. He died in my arms in the ruins of a house — a place that was once someone’s home. I held his hand as he became delirious and began speaking to his wife as if she were there with him. He told her how much he loved her, that she needed to finish their home renovations, and that they would send their son to school.

He was a builder who joined the army voluntarily in the first days of the invasion. I held him as he died and thought about how another wife is left without a husband, another child will not have a father, and another mother will mourn her son. I think of him when I hear American leaders say Ukraine is responsible for this war.

A church in Donbas destroyed by the Russian army.
A church in Donbas destroyed by the Russian army.

Courtesy of Sergii Gavryliuk

Every war eventually comes to an end, and like every Ukrainian, I dream of the day when peace finally returns to our land. We want to live, build our future, and shape our nation — a country with a thousand years of history. But what kind of peace are we being offered?

The recent talks between Ukraine and the US — and the discussion of a ceasefire — bring a glimmer of hope. But will Russia agree? I highly doubt it. And even if it does — what happens next? History has proven time and again that agreements with Russia hold no value. I have no illusions: The Kremlin will never abandon its imperial ambitions. If left unchecked, it will regroup, rearm, and strike again.

The citizens of Ukraine know the cost of Russian promises. We remember the names of people who are no longer here today because Vladimir Putin lied. Those lies mean I can’t watch my children grow up. My mother’s hair is turning gray from the stress of knowing her only son is at war. I don’t know what the future will be for the people I love or myself. Still, I will keep fighting because I refuse to let my country be swallowed up by Russia.

Ukrainians, Europeans and Americans can’t take more time learning Putin is not ready for peace. This whole nightmare would end if Russia left Ukraine. Although the war has taught me a lot, I don’t understand why Ukraine — the victim — is constantly pressured to compromise while the aggressor faces no real consequences. We are smaller, but we are not lesser. The United States has never shied away from standing up to tyranny. I want to know what has changed now.

What security guarantees will Ukraine receive, and from whom, when the US is retreating from Europe? Who will ensure that evil does not go unpunished, that the massacres, the destroyed cities and the hundreds of thousands of innocent lives lost are not forgotten? A ceasefire without justice is not peace — it’s merely a pause before the next war.

A forced freeze of the front lines, as they are today, would not end the war — it would only postpone the next stage of Russia’s aggression. Why should we surrender our land? Why should we be asked to accept the destruction of our homes and the slaughter of our people as something to be forgiven? I cannot forget. I will not forgive.

To me, this is not peace — it is surrender. It is a betrayal of the free and democratic world in the face of growing dictatorships. A rushed ceasefire, driven by political expediency, will not bring stability. It will only plant the seeds of an even greater war, and as always, it will be ordinary Ukrainians who pay the price — lives that seem to matter to Western politicians only in their speeches.

The author saved this kitten from one of the Donbas villages, and it is now living with guys in his unit.
The author saved this kitten from one of the Donbas villages, and it is now living with guys in his unit.

Courtesy of Sergii Gavryliuk

I know that many Americans support us and are angry with their elected politicians for turning their backs on Ukraine, and I thank them.

I’m afraid of dying and leaving my family behind. I’m afraid of being maimed while fighting and becoming a burden to my wife and children. The best of Ukraine is fighting and dying. The most honorable and the most courageous are trying to bring freedom to our people.

I joined the army because of freedom. I want my people to live in our own home, on our own terms. Now that I’ve met my 2-month-old twin daughters, my only dream is for them to grow up alive and in a peaceful Ukraine. I don’t want to emigrate. I was born here, and I want to raise my daughters in my country. This war is horrifying, bleak and impossible to explain to civilians who don’t live it. I ask for your help and pray you never find yourself in our position.

Sergii Gavryliuk is a father, son, and before he joined Ukraine’s army, the owner of a typography business. He is currently a junior sergeant in Ukraine’s armed forces and a Bradley IFV commander. You can follow him on X at @GarvyliukSergii.

Share Button