Google has announced it’s falling in line with President Donald Trump’s executive order to rename Lake Ontario to Lake America, changing the name of the body of water for those in the US using its Google Maps service.
The online search giant explained that the move is part of its “long-standing” policy to make updates when there’s name changes in official government sources, thus, those in the US will see “Lake America,” a name cooked up by Trump on Thursday as a result of the ongoing trade war with Canada.
Advertisement
The company noted that America’s northern neighbours will continue to see Lake Ontario, a name that’s been around since the 17th century (predating Canada and the US) and, per scholars, stems from the Iroquois word meaning “shining sea” or “beautiful lake.”
The rest of the world, according to Google, will see “Lake Ontario (Lake America)” when hovering over the body of water on the platform.
Google Maps has now capitulated to Donald Trump and changed the name of Lake Ontario to Lake America.
The change is similar to an earlier move by the tech giant after Trump, in his first day back in office, signed an executive order calling on federal agencies to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the “Gulf of America.”
The move — which also saw the company changing Denali in Alaska back to Mount McKinley on its maps service — sparked backlash at the time, with critics pointing to Google and Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai’s attending Trump’s inauguration earlier that month. In the wake of the change, Google Maps reportedly deleted reviews slamming the new name.
One critic on X described the company’s latest act of renaming as “genuinely disturbing.”
“like this will obviously just be changed back day 1 after trumps regime is over but its just deeply sad, not even demoralizing, just pathetic,” wrote @CantEverDie on X.
Advertisement
Another user on the platform blasted the move as “weak,” adding, “no one is calling it that.”
And at least one user shared their disappointment in the company, writing, “One of the things I’m most going to take away from the Trump era is how many people and institutions and corporations don’t actually stand for anything and will capitulate to bad people at a moments notice when having principles is even slightly inconvenient to them.”
Keir Starmer is having to find a new house because of a firebomb attack on the one he lived in before becoming prime minister, it has emerged.
The former PM’s biographer, Tom Baldwin, said he had been advised not to return to the property “for security reasons”.
Advertisement
Two men were jailed in June following a trial at the Old Bailey over arson attacks on property connected to Starmer.
The jury heard Roman Lavrynovych and Stanislav Carpiuc had been recruited by an anonymous Russian-speaking figure called “El Money” on the messaging service Telegram.
In the early hours of May 12, 2025, a fire broke out at Starmer’s former home in Kentish Town, north London, where his sister-in-law and her family were then living.
Advertisement
Lavrynovych and Carpiuc were also convicted of setting fire to a car once owned by Starmer, and the front door of a property in north London that Starmer had previously managed, earlier the same month.
Speaking in the House of Commons at the time, the then PM said it was “an attack on all of us, on democracy and the values that we stand for”.
Starmer and his family divided their time between Downing Street and the country grace-and-favour residence Chequers when he was prime minister.
Advertisement
But he left No.10 last month after being replaced as PM by Andy Burnham.
On Sky News on Sunday, Baldwin was asked how Starmer is coping with life out of power.
He said: “He’s had a holiday, which is something he didn’t get in his first summer. He is looking for a place to live, because he can’t go back to his old house for security reasons.”
HuffPost UK has contacted Starmer’s representatives for comment.
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
For Andy Burnham, it has been the summer of his dreams.
He has finally been able to enjoy the fulfilment of his life’s work, having become Labour leader at the third time of asking – and prime minister – on July 20.
Without the inconvenience of having to answer to parliament, which went into recess the week before, Burnham has largely spent his time making a string of announcements and seemingly endless TikTok videos with well known content creators.
Burnham has also been travelling the length and breadth of the country, meeting voters and hammering home the message, if indeed there was any doubt, that his government will do things differently than Keir Starmer’s.
Advertisement
He even managed to squeeze in a visit to the Hill Dickinson Stadium to watch his beloved Everton record a rare Premier League victory.
If you throw in his comprehensive triumph in the Makerfield by-election on June 18, it is little wonder that Burnham has rarely been seen without a smile on his face over the past three months.
He will be well aware, however, that as sure as summer will shortly make way for autumn, his political honeymoon is also coming to an end.
Advertisement
Alex Newton, deputy director of the More in Common think-tank, said Burnham still faces a huge challenge in winning back the voters Labour have lost since the 2024 general election, especially those who have switched to Reform.
Brits are also evenly split on whether the prime minister attempts so far to tackle the cost of living are simply a publicity stunt or a genuine effort to help them, he said.
“Some 54% weren’t confident he will address the cost of living,” Newton told HuffPost UK. “That kind of pessimism means that if he doesn’t deliver on this, it will hit Labour and his approval ratings.”
Advertisement
The prime minister is faced with a lengthy list of other issues, each with the potential to throw his new government off track.
Here, HuffPost UK looks at the various challenges facing the PM as MPs return to Westminster on Tuesday.
Early Release Row
On day one, justice secretary Alex Norris will set out how he plans to exempt two of the killers of PC Andrew Harper from the government’s highly controversial early release scheme.
Advertisement
Norris was given that particular hospital pass by Burnham following a huge public backlash to the prospect of Jessie Cole and Albert Blowers walking free after just six years behind bars.
But even if, as expected, Norris does manage to tweak the policy to keep the two men in prison, the sight of other dangerous criminals getting out early will undoubtedly damage the PM’s standing with the public.
Stopping The Boats
The sight of 230 migrants crossing the English Channel on a single boat became one of the defining images of the summer.
Advertisement
Although Home Office statistics showed that the overall number of asylum seekers arriving in the UK is down by 23% compared to a year ago, a YouGov poll showed the public believes the total has actually gone up.
Burnham’s acknowledged the importance of solving the problem by visiting Dover at the start of August, when he vowed to be “relentless” in his attempts to stop the boats.
But it is a problem which has confounded several prime ministers. If Burnham fails as well, Nigel Farage is waiting in the wings to replace him in No.10.
Advertisement
Defending The Realm
If the first priority of government is to keep its citizens safe, then providing the necessary funds for the military should be its number one priority.
Keir Starmer left behind a £5 billion black hole in the government’s Defence Investment Plan (DIP), which John Healey needs to fill when he delivers his first Budget as chancellor in October.
That is the same John Healey who resigned as Starmer’s defence secretary over the then PM’s failure to commit to spending 3% of gross domestic product (GDP) on the military by 2030.
Advertisement
Despite that, Healey has so far refused to commit to coming up with the cash himself, despite now being in charge of the nation’s purse strings, an apparent U-turn dismissed as “unforgivable” by the Tories.
With the geopolitical situation now more uncertain than at any time since the end of the Cold War, Burnham and Healey simply have no other option than to find the money needed to defend the realm.
Foreign Affairs
The fact that Burnham became Labour leader and PM unchallenged, he remains untested in a number of areas – none more so than on foreign affairs.
Advertisement
Although he has said he wants to be more domestically-focused than his predecessor, he can hardly ignore the ongoing conflicts in Ukraine, Iran and Gaza, this is a situation which can best be described as sub-optimal.
The PM even gave the Ukrainians a British blueprint for developing their own long-range missiles – a move which enraged the Kremlin.
Advertisement
On Gaza, Burnham has criticised Starmer for his response to Israel’s bombing campaign in the wake of the Hamas terror attacks on October 7, 2023.
The PM’s future approach to that conflict will be another defining issue of his premiership, with the potential to blow apart the tentative left-of-centre coalition he has been building.
Dealing With The Donald
As if wars around the world were not enough to contend with, Burnham must also try to maintain a positive relationship with Donald Trump, something Starmer ultimately failed to do.
Advertisement
The early signs have been positive, with the US president describing the prime minister as “terrific” on the basis of one telephone call on Burnham’s first day in the job.
However, this view seems to be based on the assumption that Burnham will satisfy Trump’s desire to see the North Sea opened up to more drilling for oil and gas.
Although he has vowed to be more “pragmatic” on the issue than Starmer, the PM has also insisted he will stand by Labour’s manifesto commitment not to award new drilling licences.
Advertisement
The pair are due to meet at the UN General Assembly in New York next month.
As unpalatable as it may be for a man who once said Trump was not welcome in Manchester, making nice with the president would give Burnham one less headache to contend with.
Labour Pains
September will also see Burnham’s first Labour Party conference as leader, an event which promises to be far more upbeat than a year ago, when it was already apparent that Starmer was not up to the job.
With Labour now topping the polls and imbued with a renewed sense of optimism, the prime minister can expect a hero’s welcome.
Advertisement
It will not all be sweetness and light, however, with left-wing campaign groups determined to pile pressure on Burnham to declare Israel’s actions in Gaza a genocide, and to impose a complete arms embargo on the country.
Doing so would provoke an angry backlash from groups such as Labour Friends of Israel, however, and trigger the kind of party split which the PM is determined to avoid.
Burnham plays the guitar in the mobile recording studio of the military and artistic unit in Kyiv.
via Associated Press
Advertisement
Political consultant Laura Emily Dunn told HuffPost UK: “The return to parliament will be a test of the PM and the government’s prioritisation – which of the hot topic issues will they want to deal with first? Early prisoner release? The The economy? Small boats? The devil will be in the detail.”
Senior Labour figures said Burnham should enjoy the Bank Holiday weekend, as it will only get more difficult from now on.
One told HuffPost UK: “Andy came to office making a lot of big promises, and his summer has gone well.
Advertisement
“But that means the party’s expectations are sky high. How will he manage that through Labour conference, the Budget, a spending review process and weekly PMQs sessions?
“Andy promised all sorts and now they are hinting the Budget will be steady. Basically – the runway on promising all things to all men is getting shorter and shorter.”
The source added: “Apart from ‘vibes’, what’s the difference with what Starmer was doing? That’s not to dismiss vibes – they really matter – but politics always comes back to policy in the end.”
Advertisement
A Labour MP added: “I think his main challenge is all the promises Andy made as mayor of Manchester to the membership will need to be kept.
“Any hint he’s reneging on them will pour rocket fuel on the Greens when they’re on the ropes. He’s also got to navigate a restive Parliamentary Labour Party, with some pissed off Starmer loyalists, and he’s got to start delivering for an impatient electorate.
“Basically, Andy’s September 2026 biggest problem is Andy Burnham from March 2026.”
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Lee Anderson has advised critics to “scroll by” Zia Yusuf’s social media posts amid heightened scrutiny over Reform UK.
Yusuf, the party’s home affairs spokesperson, attracted backlash earlier this month when he called former defence secretary Ben Wallace a “traitor” to Britain.
Asked about the criticism surrounding Yusuf at a press conference, Reform’s chief whip Anderson defended his colleague.
He said: “I think Zia is probably one of our best communicators in Reform UK, very popular with the membership and a little bit of advice to anybody: If you don’t like what Zia says, then just scroll by. It’s really simple.”
Advertisement
He added: “If you don’t like what any of us have to say on social media, you don’t have to follow us. You don’t have to read our comments. Just scroll on by and go and listen to somebody else.”
Deputy leader Richard Tice also shrugged off the scrutiny around Yusuf, insisting the unelected politician is “passionate”.
He told reporters: “We’re all passionate; Zia is passionate.
“And we all, frankly, are furious at how the previous Conservative government let us all down because they said they were going to reduce immigration numbers. They didn’t. They opened the doors, they allowed the ‘Boriswave’.
Advertisement
“So, Zia is on great form. We’re on great form. We’re looking forward to conference. And as I tweeted out a couple of days ago, I think the summer heat may have got to a few journalists.”
Yusuf himself later took issue with reporters at the right-wing outlet Guido Fawkes after the site reported that Anderson had told people to scroll past his social media posts.
He wrote on X: “The Tory Labour establishment is terrified of my social media platform.
“My accounts do over 200 million organic views a month. Which is why establishment media is hell bent on trying to censor me.”
Advertisement
He added: “Remember, the things the establishment media write about Reform are not only lies, they are the *opposite* of the truth.”
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
In his first comments since the talks collapsed on Friday, the US president wrote: “Canada wants the benefits of being a State, without being one!!!
Advertisement
“They have also charged our great farmers, for many years, massive amounts of Tariffs. No more!!! President DJT.”
The remarks echo his offensive references to Canada as the “51st state” of America since starting his second term.
The breakdown of talks triggered new 50% US tariffs – a tax on foreign imports – on $20 billion (£14.6 billion) worth of Canadian goods on Saturday on a range of goods, from hockey sticks to tongue depressors.
Advertisement
Carney chose to suspend talks rather than to compromise over a deal, making him one of the first world leaders to walk away from talks with Trump.
The Canadian prime minister said the US “asked too much” and “offered too little” in the talks.
He claimed the new tariffs were a “miscalculation” from Trump meant to “hurt and divide us”.
“You’re at war when you’re attacked, and we got attacked,” he told reporters.
“We cannot accept what they’ve offered and we will not give what they’ve asked.”
Carney – formerly the governor of the Bank of England – promised to match the tariffs “dollar for dollar” with a set of retaliatory levies to be announced on September 8.
But US trade representative Jamieson Greer told Fox & Friends Weekend doubled down on Trump’s controversial moves over the weekend, saying: “We’ve said enough and so we’ve taken countermeasures. Our interest is in protecting American workers and protecting American supply chains.”
Advertisement
This development is the latest sign that the trading partnership between Canada and the US is in tatters with no clear off-ramp for either side.
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Reform UK has received £20 million in donations from cryptocurrency investors since the 2024 general election, according to reports.
The Independent has found 60% of the funding for Nigel Farage’s party comes from wealthy individuals linked to digital currency.
Advertisement
The largest set of donations – adding up to £15 million overall – came from crypto-billionaire Christopher Harborne.
That’s the same businessman who gave Farage £5 million months before he was elected as the Clacton MP in the general election.
Farage is now facing a parliamentary sleaze probe for failing to declare that gift in the register of MPs’ interests once he was in the Commons.
Advertisement
The Reform leader insists it was a personal gift and so did not need to be declared.
The Independent’s analysis of Electoral Commission data adds pressure to the party, already facing intense scrutiny over its finances.
It found other donors like Ben Peter Delo, founder of cryptocurrency trading platform Bitmex, gave two £2m payments to Reform this year.
The wife of US crypto investor John Rost, Maria Rost, also gave nine payments worth £125,000.
Simon William Smith, a London-based bitcoin investor, donated £116,000 shortly before the election.
The former of the Bitcoin derivatives trading firm A1X, Oscar Townsley, also gave the party £30,000 last year.
Advertisement
The newspaper noted the Tories received £82,250 in donations from crypto investor and hedge fund manager Alan Eldad Howard.
However, it did not spot any crypto donations for Labour, the Liberal Democrats or the Green Party in the Electoral Commission data.
A Reform UK spokesman told HuffPost UK: “Reform takes pride in its stringent vetting of donations and always ensures that the Electoral Commission guidelines on donations, as set out in the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000, are strictly followed, as has been the case with all donations.”
Advertisement
Labour chair Bridget Phillipson tore into findings, especially after Farage triggered a new by-election in Clacton over the heightened attention his finances were getting.
He was re-elected earlier this month after all major parties refused to stand a candidate, calling the contest a political “stunt”.
Phillipson told The Independent: “Nigel Farage has spent the summer battling a bin in a desperate attempt to dodge scrutiny but people have a right to know what he’s hiding.
Advertisement
“He secretly took a £5m ‘gift’ from a Thai-based crypto billionaire and then promised to cut taxes for the crypto industry.
“Now it seems his party is awash with crypto cash. Farage is treating the public with contempt. With donations from a convicted fraudster and police probes into Reform’s donors and finances – it’s clear they think the rules are for other people.”
Advertisement
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Andy Burnhamvowed to give Brits “some breathing space” when it comes to the cost of living during his first speech as prime minister.
That was only a month ago – and he has already unveiled a series of policies aimed at making everyday life a little easier for the general public.
Advertisement
But just last week, Burnham also admitted that the changes he made might not be enough.
He told the BBC: “We will do everything that is possible for us to do. But I think everyone knows I am in position with limited room for manoeuvre.”
It was a noteworthy admission considering he has made the cost of living the central mission for his government.
Burnham has implemented a £2 cap on single bus rides, scrapped VAT on household electricity bills and announced a ban on “subscription traps”.
Advertisement
He unveiled a 20% cut to business rates for pubs, social clubs and live music venues from April onwards.
His government have also promised to help the number of unemployed young people as the number of 16 to 24-year-olds not in work surpassed a million this year for the first time in more than a decade.
The incremental changes he has unveiled appear to have had some cut-through, his net favourability rating of +13 is the highest for any prime minster since Boris Johnson at the start of the Covid pandemic, according to YouGov.
But, as Burnham alluded to when speaking to the BBC, there are plenty of obstacles which stop him from being able to make significant changes to the cost of living.
Though this is out of the government’s control, there’s a risk voters will still end up blaming the government – as they did when the Russian invasion of Ukraine caused a spike in energy prices in 2022.
Energy regulator Ofgem is expecting the price cap for household energy bills in Britain to rise by 4% in October.
There is a growing body of support for expanding drilling in the North Sea for oil and gas to boost the economy and reduce Britain’s dependence on international energy imports.
The summer heatwaves and the subsequent droughts have rocked the agricultural sector too.
Farmers fear for their yields will be hugely impacted in the months to come – meaning groceries are likely to go up in price.
Advertisement
Dr Liliana Danila, chief economist at the Food & Drink Federation (FDF) said: “Supply chain disruption isn’t going away.
“Alongside geopolitical volatility, extreme weather will continue to put pressure on the price of key ingredients. This makes it increasingly difficult for food manufacturers to shield consumers from price rises and protect their our resilience.”
The Bank of England will decide whether to raise interest rates next month, which could add another layer of pressure to Burnham.
Advertisement
Britain’s Prime Minister Andy Burnham speaks during a TV interview at The Hub Cafe following a visit to Ilkeston, Derbyshire, England, Tuesday, Aug. 11, 2026.
via Associated Press
The TUC general secretary, Paul Nowak, said: “With inflation ticking up because of rising energy bills – and no end in sight to Trump’s illegal war in Iran – we are going to have to see more government action to support households in the coming months.”
But where will this money come from? UK debt is nearing £3 trillion, which represents 94.1% of gross domestic product (GDP).
Advertisement
It comes after official figures showed an unexpected hike in government borrowing to £1.8 billion.
Speculation that the government will therefore raise taxes to meet its spending commitments is therefore rising.
All eyes will be on chancellor John Healey when he unveils his Budget on Wednesday, October 28.
The prime minister has tried not to raise the public’s expectations too high when it comes to what he can do to help the cost of living – he wrote on social media this week: “We won’t fix everything overnight.
“But wherever my government can make life a little easier, fairer or more affordable, we will. “
His last two predecessors, Keir Starmer and Rishi Sunak, tried to adopt a similar message – and neither won any plaudits from the public for doing so.
Advertisement
The question is whether Brits will even feel the changes Burnham intends to make.
“What Burnham has is an opportunity to say to the public that we can’t do everything immediately.
“And I think they understand that international affairs are a big driver of this, but it’s sort of saying, we’ve looked at areas where we can make a difference and we’re doing that.
“It may be that he cannot meet public expectations on this and it goes the other way of other previous prime ministers.
Advertisement
“But I don’t think there’s an option of not being seen to do this.”
Burnham is, of course, still enjoying the honeymoon period. But will he able to live up to his own expectations?
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Harry and Meghan moved to the US in 2020 after choosing to step down from their royal duties but will be relocating to a non-royal residence outside of London later this month.
Advertisement
The Duke of Sussex, who is fifth in line to the British throne, lost a legal challenge over how much state-funded security he and his family are entitled to while in Britain last year.
The revelation that he is now bringing his wife and two children back to the UK has therefore come as a shock.
Advertisement
When asked how the non-working royals will be protected while in Britain, the prime minister said their security a “private matter”.
“Well, this is a private matter,” he told reporters while on a visit to West Yorkshire. “It’s a matter for for Harry and for Megan, and we wish them well in the moves that they’re making.”
Education secretary Lucy Powell also told LBC: “I think that the vast majority of your listeners will welcome that news and – they obviously are not working royals anymore – and want to come back to this country.
Advertisement
“I assume because we do have great schools, great education, that’s why many people do return to this country and choose this country to bring up their children in.
“And I hope that this is all part of a bigger reconciliation for the family because you know the royal family is very important to this country and to our reputation around the world, and you know I for one think it’s great to have Harry and Meghan and their family back here.”
Harry and Meghan’s children, seven-year-old Prince Archie and five-year-old Princess Lilibet, are in the line of succession behind their father.
Advertisement
They have been enrolled in a British school from September onwards, suggesting the Sussexes intend to be back in the UK for the long-haul.
Harry and his family went to visit his father King Charles in July in Highgrove, though it’s thought their move back to Britain was not discussed.
The monarch was reportedly only told about their decision to relocate on Sunday, though he is said to welcome the idea of seeing his family more in a personal capacity.
Advertisement
Harry and Meghan are expected to continue living as private individuals.
Their return to the UK comes six years after the Sussexes dramatically fell out with the Royal Family and moved across the Atlantic amid heightened press scrutiny.
While the couple’s relationship with Charles and his wife Queen Camilla appears to be on the mend after their July visit, it’s unclear if they have built bridges with the Prince and Princess of Wales.
The King had not see his grandchildren for more than four years prior to the Sussexes’ trip earlier this summer, and the Duke of Sussex previously said security fears had stopped him bringing his family to the UK.
Advertisement
Harry and Meghan have not been seen publicly in the UK since they attended the 2022 funeral of Queen Elizabeth II.
A Home Office spokesperson said decision on the security of royals were taken by the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures.
They said: “The UK government’s protective security system is rigorous and proportionate.
“It is our long-standing policy not to provide detailed information on those arrangements, as doing so could compromise their integrity and affect individuals’ security.”
Advertisement
The Home Office, the Metropolitan Police and the royal household all sit on that executive committee.
They work together to advise the independent chair in making decisions, based on expert risk assessments and in line with government policy.
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
The government has been slammed for giving asylum seekers pamphlets on behaviour and expectations in the UK around sexual consent.
The Home Office has published a guide for those arriving in Britain telling them not to rape or sexually harass people, including partners and children.
Advertisement
The documents also tell refugees that women are allowed to “earn their own money” and “make their own decisions about their lives”.
The guidance, which appears to be aimed at men, claims people in the UK are expected not to make sexual remarks about someone “even if you think it is a compliment”.
It also urges asylum seekers not to make “kissing sounds” at someone, follow someone around or “block their path”, make rude or offensive gestures or “verbally abuse someone because of their gender, religion or how they look”.
Advertisement
The pamphlets warn asylum seekers they could end up in trouble with the authorities, lose their accommodation or face issues with their asylum claim if they are found to have broken the law.
The guidance is part of a nine-page document called, “Understanding behaviours and expectations in the UK: a guide for asylum seekers”.
Green peer Jenny Jones told Sky News: “This is a dangerous and unnecessary move by the Home Office which feeds into right wing tropes, and fuels the misinformation around migrants and people seeking asylum which has resulted in violent protests outside places where migrants are being housed, and attacks on migrants themselves.
Advertisement
“Shabana Mahmood needs to apologise for this grave error of judgement and take responsibility for any future consequences.
“We support consent education, but it needs to be universal. There is no evidence violence against women and girls is higher amongst migrants and people seeking asylum than among the general population.
“CPS research found that 30% of people do not recognise that being married or in a relationship means consent cannot be assumed, so why are only asylum seekers being told this is wrong?”
Advertisement
Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp also slammed the brochures, saying: “Instead of trying to train these mainly young, male illegal immigrants to behave in a civilised way towards women, they should be deported.”
Reform UK’s home affairs spokesperson Zia Yusuf said the guidance was a “disgrace”.
Prime minister Andy Burnham defended the brochures on Wednesday afternoon, telling broadcasters: “As a government we have a very clear principle. If you break UK law, you will be removed from the country.
“I’m currently working to ensure that foreign national offenders who can be removed from the prison system are removed from that system.”
Advertisement
He added: “So it follows that if we’re taking this approach it’s made explicitly clear what the UK law is and what the societal norms of the UK are and that’s why this approach is being taken now.”
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
A top aide to Vladimir Putin has bizarrely declared he “feels sorry” for the UK after Britain was threatened by the Russian Embassy in London over its support for Ukraine.
Moscow’s representatives in the UK warned of the “consequences” following confirmation that British-made drones had been used in recent Ukrainian attacks in Russia.
Advertisement
The embassy claimed Britain was “deliberately opting for an escalation of the Ukraine crisis,” and said the “deeper its involvement in the conflict… the higher the price it will pay”.
UK prime minister Andy Burnham remained unperturbed by the threats on Tuesday, telling reporters that the UK was “providing support so that Ukraine can defend itself and that’s been the British position all the way through this conflict, by previous prime ministers – it remains the case with me”.
Asked about the spat with the UK on Wednesday, Russia’s foreign minister Sergei Lavrov tried to deliver yet another threat as he again suggested Britain is directly involved in the war.
Advertisement
He told the media: “I feel sorry for the United Kingdom, if it is going to stand with Ukraine until the very end.
“As for the substance of our Embassy’s comment, it means only one thing: President Vladimir Putin has warned of our right to act in any area of the world’s oceans, should anyone encroach on our interests or our property.
“We have exactly the same right to regard the proudly announced direct involvement of British missile forces in strikes against the Russian Federation as participation in the war. With all the consequences that entails.”
Advertisement
His remarks come after a former deputy foreign minister of Russia told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that many in Moscow interpret the recent strikes from Ukraine as proof the UK is “part of the war”.
“The situation now is very dangerous, because the tension of conflict in Ukraine really is increasing,” Andrei Federov added. “The coming couple of months will face this tension, this escalation which can bring us to totally different situation unlike ever before.”
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.