Earlier studies suggested the young woman, known as the Beachy Head Woman, may have had recent ancestry from sub-Saharan Africa or the Mediterranean. New genetic research now points in a different direction, indicating she was most likely from Britain.

Using advanced DNA sequencing, researchers aimed to resolve questions that have surrounded the Beachy Head Woman for more than a decade.

A Skeleton Found in a Basement

The remains were rediscovered in 2012 during the Eastbourne Ancestors Project, when a box was opened in the basement of Eastbourne Town Hall. Inside was the skeleton of a young woman from the Roman era. A handwritten label indicated she had been found near the Beachy Head headland sometime in the 1950s, but little additional information was available.

Public attention grew after early research suggested the woman may have had recent sub-Saharan African ancestry. If correct, the skeleton would have represented rare early evidence of African ancestry in Roman Britain.

Later, unpublished research proposed a different origin, suggesting she may have come from the Mediterranean, possibly Cyprus. That conclusion, however, relied on poorly preserved DNA, leaving uncertainty around her true background.

New DNA Methods Bring New Answers

Researchers have since returned to the skeleton with improved analytical tools. According to Dr. William Marsh, one of the scientists who analysed the DNA, the new results suggest a much closer connection to Britain.

“By using state-of-the-art DNA techniques and newly published genomes, we were able to determine the ancestry of the Beachy Head Woman with much greater precision than before,” William reveals. “We show she carries genetic ancestry that is most similar to other individuals from the local population of Roman-era Britain.”

Dr. Selina Brace, an ancient DNA specialist and senior author of the study, says the evolving interpretation reflects how science progresses over time.

“Our scientific knowledge and understanding is constantly evolving, and as scientists, it’s our job to keep pushing for answers. Thanks to the advancement of technology that has occurred in the past decade since Beachy Head Woman first came to light, we are excited to report these new comprehensive data and share more about this individual and her life.”

The research findings were published in the Journal of Archaeological Science.

Life in Roman Britain

Britain’s earliest major encounter with Ancient Rome occurred in 55BCE, when Julius Caesar led a military campaign to what is now Kent. Roman Britain itself was established nearly a century later under Emperor Claudius.

At its height, Roman control extended from southern England to the Antonine Wall north of modern-day Glasgow. The region included extensive networks of forts, roads, and towns linked to the wider Roman Empire, facilitating movement across Europe, north Africa, and beyond.

Historical inscriptions and archaeological evidence show that travel between Britain and north Africa was common during this period and continued even after Roman rule ended. Ancient DNA studies have also identified people with mixed European and sub-Saharan ancestry living in Dorset and Kent during the seventh century.

What We Know About the Beachy Head Woman

During the Roman occupation, the area around Beachy Head was dotted with settlements and infrastructure tied to the empire. Archaeological sites nearby include a villa at Eastbourne, a fort at Pevensey, and rural communities at Bullock Down and Birling. Several burials have been found in the region, including adults and a child.

The exact burial location of the Beachy Head Woman remains unknown, but radiocarbon dating indicates she died between 129 and 311 AD, aligning with the Roman period in Britain.

Physical analysis of her skeleton offers further insight into her life. She was likely between 18-25 years old at the time of her death and stood slightly over 1.5 meters tall. A healed injury on her leg points to a serious but survivable wound earlier in her life.

Chemical signatures in her bones also provide clues about her diet. Carbon and nitrogen levels suggest she regularly consumed seafood.

From Early DNA Clues to Clearer Evidence

Initial genetic analysis began in 2017, when researchers first attempted to extract DNA from the remains. Those early results hinted at a Mediterranean origin, but the DNA was limited in quantity and quality.

Because the data were insufficient to support firm conclusions, the findings were not published.

By 2024, advances in ancient DNA techniques made it possible to recover far more genetic material. Researchers returned to the skeleton and successfully sequenced significantly higher-quality DNA.

This expanded dataset allowed for a more detailed comparison with known populations. The analysis showed the Beachy Head Woman’s DNA most closely matched rural communities from Roman-era Britain, with no evidence of recent African or Mediterranean ancestry. Based on these results, researchers concluded she likely originated from southern England.

Reconstructing a Face From the Past

The improved DNA data also enabled modern forensic analysis. Scientists predicted that the Beachy Head Woman probably had light skin pigmentation, blue eyes, and fair hair. These findings were used to update her digital facial reconstruction.

As DNA technology continues to advance, researchers expect even deeper insights into the lives of people who lived thousands of years ago, allowing forgotten individuals like the Beachy Head Woman to be better understood within their historical world.

The study, published in Scientific Reports (Nature Portfolio), points to a significant shift. Generative AI systems have now reached a level where they can outperform the average human on certain creativity measures. At the same time, the most creative people still show a clear and consistent advantage over even the strongest AI models.

AI Reaches Average Human Creativity Levels

Researchers evaluated several leading large language models, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and others, and compared their performance with results from more than 100,000 human participants. The findings highlight a clear turning point. Some AI systems, including GPT-4, exceeded average human scores on tasks designed to measure divergent linguistic creativity.

“Our study shows that some AI systems based on large language models can now outperform average human creativity on well-defined tasks,” explains Professor Karim Jerbi. “This result may be surprising — even unsettling — but our study also highlights an equally important observation: even the best AI systems still fall short of the levels reached by the most creative humans.”

Further analysis by the study’s co-first authors, postdoctoral researcher Antoine Bellemare-Pépin (Université de Montréal) and PhD candidate François Lespinasse (Université Concordia), revealed a striking pattern. While some AI models now outperform the average person, peak creativity remains firmly human.

In fact, when researchers examined the most creative half of participants, their average scores surpassed those of every AI model tested. The gap grew even larger among the top 10 percent of the most creative individuals.

“We developed a rigorous framework that allows us to compare human and AI creativity using the same tools, based on data from more than 100,000 participants, in collaboration with Jay Olson from the University of Toronto,” says Professor Karim Jerbi, who is also an associate professor at Mila.

How Scientists Measure Creativity in Humans and AI

To evaluate creativity fairly across humans and machines, the research team used multiple methods. The primary tool was the Divergent Association Task (DAT), a widely used psychological test that measures divergent creativity, or the ability to generate diverse and original ideas from a single prompt.

Created by study co-author Jay Olson, the DAT asks participants, whether human or AI, to list ten words that are as unrelated in meaning as possible. An example of a highly creative response includes words like “galaxy, fork, freedom, algae, harmonica, quantum, nostalgia, velvet, hurricane, photosynthesis.”

Performance on this task is strongly linked to results on other established creativity tests used in writing, idea generation, and creative problem solving. Although the task is language-based, it goes well beyond vocabulary. It engages broader cognitive processes involved in creative thinking across many domains. The DAT also has practical advantages, as it takes only two to four minutes to complete and can be accessed online by the general public.

From Word Lists to Real Creative Writing

The researchers then explored whether AI success on this simple word association task could extend to more complex and realistic creative activities. To test this, they compared AI systems and human participants on creative writing challenges such as composing haiku (a short three-line poetic form), writing movie plot summaries, and producing short stories.

The results followed a familiar pattern. While AI systems sometimes exceeded the performance of average humans, the most skilled human creators consistently delivered stronger and more original work.

Can AI Creativity Be Adjusted?

These findings raised another important question. Is AI creativity fixed, or can it be shaped? The study shows that creativity in AI can be adjusted by changing technical settings, particularly the model’s temperature. This parameter controls how predictable or adventurous the generated responses are.

At lower temperature settings, AI produces safer and more conventional outputs. At higher temperatures, responses become more varied, less predictable, and more exploratory, allowing the system to move beyond familiar ideas.

The researchers also found that creativity is strongly influenced by how instructions are written. For example, prompts that encourage models to think about word origins and structure using etymology lead to more unexpected associations and higher creativity scores. These results emphasize that AI creativity depends heavily on human guidance, making interaction and prompting a central part of the creative process.

Will AI Replace Human Creators?

The study offers a balanced perspective on fears that artificial intelligence could replace creative professionals. While AI systems can now match or exceed average human creativity on certain tasks, they still have clear limitations and rely on human direction.

“Even though AI can now reach human-level creativity on certain tests, we need to move beyond this misleading sense of competition,” says Professor Karim Jerbi. “Generative AI has above all become an extremely powerful tool in the service of human creativity: it will not replace creators, but profoundly transform how they imagine, explore, and create — for those who choose to use it.”

Rather than signaling the end of creative careers, the findings suggest a future where AI serves as a creative assistant. By expanding ideas and opening new paths for exploration, AI may help amplify human imagination rather than replace it.

“By directly confronting human and machine capabilities, studies like ours push us to rethink what we mean by creativity,” concludes Professor Karim Jerbi.

About the Study

The paper titled “Divergent creativity in humans and large language models” was published in Scientific Reports on January 21, 2026. The research brought together scientists from Université de Montréal, Université Concordia, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mila (Quebec AI Institute), and Google DeepMind.

Professor Karim Jerbi led the study, with Antoine Bellemare-Pépin (Université de Montréal) and François Lespinasse (Université Concordia) serving as co-first authors. The research team also included Yoshua Bengio, founder of Mila and LoiZéro, and a pioneer of deep learning, the technology behind modern AI systems such as ChatGPT.

The findings suggest that Indigenous communities played an active role in shaping the plant’s future. By moving and using this wild potato, they may have begun the earliest stages of domestication while also building a distinctive cultural tradition in the Four Corners region.

The Four Corners Potato and Its Ancient Use

The plant at the center of the study is known as the Four Corners potato (Solanum jamesii). It is a small but hardy and nutritious wild potato that still grows across southwestern North America today, ranging from southern Utah and Colorado into northern Mexico.

To learn how the potato was used in the past, researchers examined ground stone tools from 14 archaeological sites. These sites span a wide stretch of time, from several hundred to many thousands of years old. The tools were tested for tiny starch granules left behind when plants were processed for food.

Stone Tools and Genetic Clues Tell the Story

Starch from the Four Corners potato was identified on tools from nine of the sites. Some of the evidence dates back as far as 10,900 cal BP. Most of these locations sit near the modern northern edge of the potato’s range, along the borders of Colorado, Utah, Arizona, and New Mexico.

Earlier genetic research adds another layer of evidence. Some living populations of the Four Corners potato in this northern area show strong genetic signs that they originated much farther south. This supports the idea that people carried the plant across the region, extending its range north into Utah and Colorado, where it still grows today.

Early Domestication and Living Cultural Traditions

Researchers note that repeated use of a plant and its movement beyond its natural range are both key indicators of early domestication. In this case, those behaviors appear to have begun thousands of years ago.

Even today, the Four Corners potato holds cultural importance for Indigenous communities. Alongside laboratory work, the research team interviewed 15 Navajo (Diné) elders. These conversations confirmed that the wild potato remains known, eaten, and used for spiritual purposes.

Lisbeth Louderback adds: “By combining new archaeobotanical data and elder interviews with transport patterns identified by genetic sequencing of the Four Corners potato, we have defined an anthropogenic range distinct from its natural distribution. This reveals a unique cultural identity developed by ancient transport of this species — one that continues into the present day.”

Cynthia Wilson adds: “The mobility of Indigenous foodways was driven by kinship-based practices across the landscape. Indigenous knowledge holders, especially matrilineal women, held on to these seedlings and stories across generations to sustain ties to ancestral land and foodways.”

Funding: This work was funded by the National Science Foundation (Award BCS-1827414). General funding was also received from Red Butte Garden and the Natural History Museum of Utah.

This disconnect has led researchers to search for ways to restore communication without repairing the spinal cord itself.

Testing EEG as a Noninvasive Solution

In a study published in APL Bioengineering by AIP Publishing, scientists from universities in Italy and Switzerland explored whether electroencephalography (EEG) could help bridge this gap. Their research focused on determining whether EEG could capture brain signals linked to movement and potentially reconnect them with the body.

When a person attempts to move a paralyzed limb, the brain still produces electrical activity associated with that action. If these signals can be detected and interpreted, they could be sent to a spinal cord stimulator that activates the nerves responsible for movement in that limb.

Moving Beyond Brain Implants

Most earlier studies relied on surgically implanted electrodes to record movement signals directly from the brain. Although these systems have shown encouraging results, the research team wanted to investigate whether EEG could offer a safer option.

EEG systems are worn as caps covered with electrodes that record brain activity from the scalp. While the setup may appear complex, the researchers say it avoids the risks involved with placing devices inside the brain or spinal cord.

“It can cause infections; it’s another surgical procedure,” said author Laura Toni. “We were wondering whether that could be avoided.”

Challenges in Reading Movement Signals

Using EEG to decode movement attempts pushes the limits of current technology. Because EEG electrodes sit on the surface of the head, they struggle to capture signals that originate deeper within the brain.

This limitation is less problematic for movements involving the arms and hands. Signals controlling the legs and feet are harder to detect because they come from areas located closer to the center of the brain.

“The brain controls lower limb movements mainly in the central area, while upper limb movements are more on the outside,” said Toni. “It’s easier to have a spatial mapping of what you’re trying to decode compared to the lower limbs.”

Machine Learning Helps Interpret Brain Activity

To better analyze the EEG data, the researchers used a machine learning algorithm designed to work with small and complex datasets. During testing, patients wore EEG caps while attempting a series of simple movements. The team recorded the resulting brain activity and trained the algorithm to sort the signals into different categories.

The system successfully distinguished between moments when patients tried to move and when they remained still. However, it had difficulty telling different movement attempts apart.

What Future Research Could Achieve

The researchers believe their method can be improved with further development. They plan to refine the algorithm so it can recognize specific actions such as standing, walking, or climbing. The team also hopes to explore how these decoded signals could be used to activate implanted stimulators in patients recovering from spinal cord injuries.

If successful, this approach could move noninvasive brain scanning closer to helping people regain meaningful movement after paralysis.

Cease leads Arizona State University’s Global Locust Initiative, where she studies how locusts behave and how their destructive swarms can be controlled. While her research focuses on reducing damage to crops and communities, she also brings a deep respect for the insects themselves.

Locust Swarms Remain a Global Threat

For many people, locust swarms evoke images of ancient plagues, but the danger is very real today. Around the world, swarms can devastate crops across vast regions, wipe out livelihoods, and in some areas disrupt education and long term economic prospects for children. A single swarm can span hundreds of square miles — roughly the size of a major city such as New York City or Phoenix.

That is why Cease and her international research team paid close attention when they identified a straightforward, soil-based way to reduce locust feeding. The scientists realized early on that the approach could have life changing consequences. To their knowledge, this is the first study to test the method in real farming environments and show that it works outside the lab.

Testing the Idea With Farmers in Senegal

The researchers partnered with farmers in Senegal who regularly face outbreaks of the Senegalese grasshopper. Unlike the desert locust, this species does not form massive swarms, but its frequent appearances and smaller groupings can cause even greater harm to local farmers. These communities had previously collaborated with Cease and pushed for a larger field study.

Each farmer planted two plots of millet — one treated with nitrogen fertilizer and one left untreated.

The contrast was clear. Fertilized plots had fewer locusts, reduced crop damage, and harvests that were twice as large as those from untreated fields.

“This breakthrough represents an important step forward in the sustainable management of migratory pests, offering a community-based tool that expands the available treatment options,” says Cease, who is also an associate professor in the ASU School of Sustainability and School of Life Sciences.

The study published in the journal Scientific Reports. Associate Professor Mamour Touré of Université Gaston Berger in Saint-Louis, Senegal, served as lead author, while Cease was the principal investigator for the USAID-supported project.

“The results are of major importance to the scientific community and also to Senegalese farmers,” Touré says. “The study gave them a better understanding of grasshoppers and locusts, as well as a practical way to control them at the local level.”

Why Soil Quality Shapes Locust Behavior

The Global Locust Initiative is part of the Julie Ann Wrigley Global Futures Laboratory and focuses on the many systems that influence locust outbreaks. Environmental conditions, insect biology and behavior, economic pressures, public policy, and land management all contribute to cycles of destruction — and also create opportunities to interrupt them.

After more than 15 years of research, Cease uncovered a consistent pattern. Crops grown in nutrient-poor soil tend to encourage locust outbreaks because those plants contain high levels of carbohydrates and very little protein.

“This carbohydrate bias, or the ‘donut diet,’ is optimal for populations of locusts and swarming grasshoppers,” Cease says. Much like endurance athletes who rely on carbohydrates for energy, locusts depend on carb-heavy plants to fuel their long-distance movement.

Plants grown in nitrogen-rich soil tell a different story. They contain more protein and fewer carbohydrates, making them difficult food for locusts. Their bodies struggle to process the excess protein and fail to get enough energy to thrive.

Protein-Packed Plants Prevent Pests

These findings led to a key question. Could shifting the balance of protein and carbohydrates in crops prevent locust damage? Earlier lab experiments and field observations hinted that it might, but the idea had never been tested on working farms. For Cease, that gap made the next step obvious.

Two Senegalese villages that had collaborated with her before volunteered to take part. Their farms regularly suffer severe losses from Senegalese grasshopper swarms.

In the experiment, 100 farmers each grew two millet plots each — one treated with nitrogen fertilizer and one left untreated for comparison.

Researchers were unsure whether locusts might still enter treated plots from nearby untreated fields or whether higher protein plants might attract other pests. To find out, the team counted locusts and measured crop damage three times during the growing season and recorded yields at harvest.

The results were decisive. Treated plots had fewer locusts, less leaf damage, and double the millet yield at harvest. The team also found no evidence that adding nitrogen worsened other pest problems.

From Fertilizer to Compost Solutions

Although nitrogen fertilizer was supplied for the study, it is not a realistic long term option for many farming communities. Sustainable control requires affordable methods that also protect soil health.

“Ongoing work is focused exclusively on compost, and we seem to be getting the same results,” Cease says.

USAID funding for the project ended in early 2025, but farmers in Senegal have continued the composting approach on their own, encouraged by the results.

“Farmers unanimously stated that they no longer burn crop residues after land clearing, but instead practice composting to fertilize their fields, thereby helping to reduce grasshopper infestations. This technique was fully mastered thanks to the project,” Touré says.

The research team is now seeking additional funding to expand the work into other regions heavily affected by locusts.

Why Locust Research Matters to the United States

The U.S. currently has no native locust species. So why study them at all? Cease says that could change. She is closely monitoring the Central American locust, whose range reaches within about 200 miles of the U.S. border.

“We can say with pretty high certainty that Texas will be very suitable for locusts in about 10 to 15 years,” Cease says. “Whether or not they will create a problem is yet to be determined, but it’s something that we should definitely be aware of.”

Even without locusts, grasshoppers already pose major challenges across the country. There are 12 key species known collectively as the Dirty Dozen.

According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, these 12 rangeland grasshoppers (plus one cricket) are among the most serious pest threats in the western United States. When they swarm, they can strip grazing land and outcompete livestock for food, creating serious problems for ranchers.

While chemical pesticides remain the primary control tool, the Global Locust Initiative is working to identify alternatives that are safer for people and the environment.

What scientists learn from locust outbreaks abroad may prove critical at home, helping the U.S. manage migratory pests more effectively and prepare for the possibility that locusts one day cross the border.

The researchers say the results likely reflect a broad mix of health risks associated with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), along with the long-term effects of how people with ADHD are treated and supported across adulthood.

Published in JAMA Network Open, the research is one of the largest and longest-running studies to examine how ADHD traits in childhood are linked to physical health later in life.

Evidence Points to Lifelong Health Challenges

Senior author Professor Joshua Stott (UCL Psychology & Language Sciences) said: “Here we have added to the concerning evidence base that people with ADHD are more likely to experience worse health than average across their lifespan.

“People with ADHD can thrive with the right support, but this is often lacking, both due to a shortage of tailored support services but also because ADHD remains underdiagnosed, particularly in people in midlife and older, with needs unaddressed.”

How ADHD Can Affect Daily Functioning

People with ADHD experience differences in attention, along with increased levels of hyperactivity or impulsivity. Many have high energy and can focus intensely on activities that capture their interest, but may struggle to stay focused on routine or less engaging tasks.

These challenges can affect planning, time management, and impulse control. Over time, this may make school and work more difficult, increasing the risk of longer-term social and occupational difficulties.

ADHD begins in childhood, and although it is now widely recognized that it often continues into adulthood, adults in the UK receive less treatment than those in other high-income countries. Support services also remain limited.

Tracking Health Outcomes Over Decades

To examine long-term effects, the researchers analyzed data from 10,930 participants in the UCL-led 1970 British Cohort Study, which has followed individuals from birth into middle age.

ADHD traits were assessed using behavior questionnaires completed by parents and teachers when participants were 10 years old. These measures were used regardless of whether a participant had ever received a formal ADHD diagnosis.

Higher Rates of Chronic Illness and Disability

The study found that people with higher levels of ADHD traits in childhood were more likely to report physical health problems by age 46. They had 14% higher odds of reporting two or more conditions, including migraine, back problems, cancer, epilepsy or diabetes.

Among those with elevated ADHD traits at age 10, 42% reported having at least two physical health problems in midlife. By comparison, 37% of those with lower ADHD trait scores reported the same.

Participants with higher childhood ADHD traits were also more likely to report physical health-related disability (reporting having problems with work or other daily activities as a result of their physical health) at age 46.

Possible Reasons Behind the Health Differences

The researchers found that poorer physical health outcomes were partly linked to higher rates of mental health problems, increased BMI, and higher smoking rates among people with ADHD.

Previous studies have also shown that people with ADHD are more likely to experience stressful life events and social exclusion, and are less likely to receive timely medical screening and care.

The association between childhood ADHD traits and physical health-related disability appeared to be stronger in women than in men.

Professor Stott added: “All of these potential explanatory factors align with the fact that ADHD makes impulse control more difficult, the need for instant gratification and reward more intense, and is also associated with worse mental health in part due to the social disadvantage people with ADHD face.”

Implications for Support and Public Health

A separate study published last year by the same research team reported a possible reduction in life expectancy among adults diagnosed with ADHD, although this finding was not part of the current research.

Lead author Dr, Amber John, who began the work at UCL before moving to the University of Liverpool, emphasized the importance of proper support: “It’s important to note that people with ADHD are a diverse group, with a range of different strengths and experiences, and most will lead long, healthy lives.

“However, many face significant barriers to timely diagnosis and appropriate support. This is important because providing the right support for and meeting the needs of people with ADHD can help to improve their physical and mental health outcomes.

“Additionally, public health strategies should consider the needs of people with ADHD, such as by making screening programs and ongoing health monitoring more accessible for people with ADHD.”