Committing to the Stretch

One thing I love about blogging is that by writing about many aspects of personal growth, I improve and deepen my understanding of those aspects. Writing helps me glean fresh insights connect the dots in new ways.

This has been especially true of workshops and courses. Initially such projects felt daunting, but eventually I got the hang of them. Now a big part of my motivation for selecting such projects is the rich personal gains I’ll make in my ability to understand and apply the material.

The next major deep dive I want to create is a course on creative productivity called Amplify. I expect to start working on it this summer. Just knowing that this project is coming me up is making me extra observant of my daily habits and workflows. I’ve made a lot of tweaks and improvements to how I work this year as I seek to better understand how to flow through a variety of creative projects, large and small.

One frame that works especially well is committing to a project before you know how to complete it. It’s extremely limiting to only say yes to projects when you can already see the finish line. Where’s the fun in that? Where’s the growth and challenge?

When you demand that you’re going to have to teach something where you aren’t 100% certain about the outcome, that kind of commitment feels edgier. It keeps you on your toes, feeling awake and alert.

You don’t have to fake it. You don’t have to overextend yourself. You can challenge yourself to make a commitment at the edge of your comfort zone while still feeling confident that you can pull it off.

This kind of confidence goes beyond your belief in your own knowledge and skills. You have to stretch further into trusting reality, expecting that if you take on something bold and worthwhile, reality will back you up.

I’ve noticed that when I set well-aligned goals, reality meets me halfway. The goal has to include some kind of personal stretching though. It can’t be too easy. If reality thinks that I’m copping out and taking it easy, it won’t lend a hand. But if reality sees that I’m offering to stretch into the unknown, it just seems to love that kind of offer.

Sometimes I think that this is a big part of our collective life purpose here. We’re here to explore the unknown, and that requires stretching ourselves beyond the familiar and the comfortable. We have to push into the dark areas of life that we don’t 100% understand.

Life opens the floodgates of support when it detects a real commitment to exploring the unfamiliar and the uncomfortable. When we play it safe, however, life just yawns at us.

People often struggle to achieve easy and accessible goals. What they don’t often realize is that this is why they’re failing. They set their sights so low that life (and other people) mostly ignore them. And no fire burns within them for pursuing life’s low-hanging fruit. Stretch for the upper branches; don’t just hug the trunk.

Consider your biggest upcoming goal. Are you playing it safe by setting a small and easy goal? Are you playing it safe by keeping your options open and not really committing to it 100%? If you’re playing it safe at all, you know it, and life knows it. There’s no hiding. Life won’t reward you for playing small.

What’s the goal that scares you a bit? What’s the goal that stirs up some desire when you think about it, but you also think it could be too much? Where are the edgy goals?

Have you committed to the edginess? What would life say about that? How would you know what life thinks? Well, has it clearly indicated that it accepts your offer? Or does it seem to be ignoring you?

When you make a good offer to life, life responds. It demonstrates that your offer is accepted. When you get no response, make a stronger offer.

Your goals are offers to life. Life will respond well if it likes your offers. If life doesn’t respond, it doesn’t mean that you’re unworthy or that life doesn’t like you. It just means that life declined your offer.

It takes time to discover what types of offers life appreciates from you. So make a lot of offers. Learn what life accepts and what it ignores. The pattern I keep seeing is that life loves stretch offers backed by a clear willingness to commit.

Share Button

Coronavirus: Genetic study assesses effect on different people

The Edinburgh University-led research will identify why the disease affects some more than others.

Share Button

Ancient reptile had mammal-like tooth enamel

A new study by University of Alberta paleontologists shows that one type of ancient reptiles evolved a special type of tooth enamel, similar to that of mammals, with high resistance to wear and tear. The study is the first to report this kind of enamel in a fossil reptile.

The reptile — known as Priosphenodon — was a herbivore from the Late Cretaceous period that was about one metre in length. Part of a group of reptiles called sphenodontians, these reptiles are unique in that they lost their ability to replace individual teeth. Instead, sphenodontians added new teeth to the back ends of their jaws as they grew.

“Priosphenodon has the strangest teeth I have personally ever seen,” said Aaron LeBlanc, postdoctoral fellow in the Faculty of Science Department of Biological Sciences and lead author on the study. “Some aspects of their dental anatomy are reminiscent of what happened in the evolution of early mammal teeth.”

The specimens were found in Argentina’s Río Negro province as part of ongoing collaborative fieldwork and research between Michael Caldwell, professor in the Department of Biological Sciences and the Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, and Argentinian paleontologist and fieldwork leader Sebastián Apesteguía. In order to look more closely at the teeth of Priosphenodon, the researchers cut open pieces of jaw and examined tissue-level detail preserved inside the teeth. They also used non-invasive CT scans to examine more complete jaw specimens.

“Priosphenodon enamel is not only thicker than that of most other reptiles, the enamel crystals are ‘woven’ into long threads that run through the whole width of the enamel. These threads are called enamel prisms, and they are almost exclusively found in mammals,” said LeBlanc, who is working under Caldwell’s supervision. “Our results suggest that strong selective pressures can force reptiles to come up with some very innovative solutions to the problems associated with tooth wear and abrasive diets — some of which mirror what happened in our earliest mammal ancestors.”

The scientists also note that there is one kind of lizard alive today that has prismatic enamel like Priosphenodon — the spiny-tailed lizard of Australia. Like Priosphenodon, it mostly eats plants and has lost the ability to replace its worn teeth. However, the two reptiles are not closely related.

Collaborators on this study include Sebastián Apesteguía from Universidad Maimónides and the Fundación de Historia Natural Félix de Azara in Buenos Aires, Argentina and Hans Larsson from McGill University in Montreal, Canada. Funding for this research was provided by the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica in Argentina, National Geographic, and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).

Story Source:

Materials provided by University of Alberta. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Share Button

Ants use collective ‘brainpower’ to navigate obstacles

Ants use their numbers to overcome navigational challenges that are too large and disorienting to be tackled by any single individual, reports a new study in the open-access journal eLife.

The results demonstrate the potential advantages of group living and collective cognition in making certain environments habitable for a species.

“Cooperation is a common means by which animals can increase their cognitive capacity, and we were intrigued as to whether this cooperation allows ants to extend the range of environments in which they can efficiently collect food,” says first author Aviram Gelblum, a postdoctoral fellow in senior author Ofer Feinerman’s lab at the Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel. “We addressed this question by studying the cooperative transport of ants as they attempted to transport large loads through semi-natural environments.”

A semi-natural labyrinth was created by randomly spreading cubes of the same size across a surface, to mimic a random stone-riddled terrain. Longhorn crazy ants were then tracked while they carried food to a target — their nest — and the coordinates of the food load, the ants and cubes were extracted using image processing. As the number of cubes increased and the maze became more complex, the ants became slower at solving it. They were still able to solve mazes with up to 55% cube coverage, but at 60% coverage most mazes become physically impassable. Importantly, the challenges imposed by the cubes were practically invisible to individual ants that could easily traverse the maze through paths that were blocked for the much larger load.

The team then compared the ants’ performance to a well-established model of movement — a random walk that is biased towards a certain direction. In this model, direction is changed in response to the physical feedback of hitting a barrier — in this case, a cube surface — so that eventually the way through is discovered. They found that the ants outperformed the computer model on all but the very simplest cube configurations. The higher the number of cubes in the labyrinth, the better the ants were at solving it compared to the computer model.

To work out how the ants outperformed the computer model, they looked at how the ants spent much longer walking away from the target they were trying to reach. This change in movement could not be explained solely by the physical feedback of encountering a cube. However, it is known that collective movement of ants is guided by leader ants who sense information around the group but do not carry the load.

When the team looked more closely at these non-carrying ants, they found they were spread across a circular region from the carrying population with an outer radius of up to 10cm. Although only a few ants were this far out, even a single leader ant was able to steer the group and guide it as far as 10cm to avoid a physical barrier.

They also noticed that when ants carrying a load got stuck, leader ants constantly presented the carrying group with potential crossing routes. Coordinated movement then allowed the entire group to explore the suggested routes, until they found an escape route that bypassed the obstacle. In this way, the ants were able to extend their sensing range beyond the immediate proximity and, potentially, gain a better idea of the obstacles they were facing.

To see whether this extended sensing was key to solving the labyrinth, the team tested whether this ‘sensing’ could improve the computer’s ability to avoid the cubes. As anticipated, setting the sensing range to match that of the ants allowed the computer model to match the ants’ performance in the labyrinth. By contrast, increasing the sensing range to above that of the ants had no effect on the computer’s performance, suggesting the ants had worked out the optimal sensing range for that specific maze.

“We have shown that, in this environment, ants use their numbers to collectively extend how far they can sense,” concludes senior author Ofer Feinerman, the Henry J. Leir Professorial Chair of the Department of Physics of Complex Systems, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel. “Although this extension is modest, it allows for extremely fast traversal times that are better than known physical movement models for navigating disordered environments.”

Story Source:

Materials provided by eLife. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Share Button

Alaskan rainforests are a global lichen hotspot

The rainforest fjords of Southeastern Alaska harbour one of the highest concentrations of lichen diversity found anywhere on Earth, according to a new study spearheaded by University of Alberta scientists.

An international team of researchers led by Toby Spribille, assistant professor in the Department of Biological Sciences at the Faculty of Science, details the names and habitats of lichens, a symbiosis of fungi and algae in Alaska’s Glacier Bay National Park.

The researchers found more than 900 species of lichen, including 27 new, never-seen-before species “This level of novelty biodiversity is usually associated with ‘lost valleys’ in the tropics,” says Spribille, Canada Research Chair in Symbiosis. “To find this in Southeast Alaska really speaks to how little we still know about coastal rainforests. There are so many new species to science that if you know what to look for, you can average one new species to science per day of field work.”

The authors compared cumulative numbers of lichens in four different national parks in southern Alaska and found that together, the parks contain more than 1300 species. This work highlights the importance of understanding local biodiversity for nature conservation. Each national park is home to many species not found in the other parks.

Within Glacier Bay National Park alone, each fjord was different. “Of 950 species, we found only 14 species common to all sectors of Glacier Bay,” added Spribille. “It makes you wonder what remains to be discovered in all the areas we couldn’t get to.”

The research team expresses hope that the insights from Glacier Bay National Park will help guide decision-making in other parts of the coastal rainforest ecosystem.

“At high latitudes, biodiversity is locked up in other groups of organisms — and in Alaska, lichens are clearly one of those groups,” said Spribille. “This ecosystem is clearly very old and very diverse for some species groups. Each island and valley is different. As ecosystems go, it is definitely one that I’d label ‘handle with care.'”

The study was funded by the National Park Service Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit in the United States in collaboration with the University of Montana, Michigan State University, and the University of Graz in Austria.

Story Source:

Materials provided by University of Alberta. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Share Button

Health24.com | 16 000-plus people have volunteered to be infected with coronavirus – but no sign trial will go ahead

The general goal is to try and distance yourself as much as possible from the novel coronavirus. However, a controversial approach called 1 Day Sooner is aiming to purposely infect a large number of volunteers with the virus to speed up clinical trials. 

When Health24 reported on this approach in late April 2020, 2 300 volunteers had already signed up for this grassroots effort. But that number has now grown to more than 16 000, according to the latest reports.

What is the goal of this approach?

Co-founder Josh Morrison wants to use this campaign to demonstrate that many people are keen to participate in helping to speed up clinical trials and the possible success of a vaccine.

Without a successful vaccine or treatment, the only reality is to live with the virus and practice measures of physical distancing. A vaccine is the only way to return to a normal world as we know it. Unfortunately, developing a vaccine takes a long time and comprises several stages – the four phases of clinical trials being crucial to establish safety and efficacy in a large, diverse group of people.

Morrison stated that the goal of 1 Day Sooner is to recruit as many people as possible to pre-qualify them as suitable to participate in human trials as they occur.

Controversial or selfless?

But what about the ethics and risks involved in voluntarily being infected with a virus? Dr Nir Eyal, director of the Center for Population-Level Bioethics at Rutgers University agrees that it’s not a standard approach, but that it may help.

“It’s not every day we give a healthy individual an exposure to a pathogen – the very same thing doctors are trying to protect people from, but it becomes increasingly clear that the only sustainable exit from the current health and societal crisis is a vaccine, and there are ways to conduct such a trial that are perfectly ethical,” he said in a statement.

What does the human challenge entail?

Initially, people who sign up for this challenge should be relatively young and healthy.

According to an article published in Nature, the risk of harm in volunteers is reduced significantly when they are between the ages of 20 and 45 and generally healthy.

The goal is not to make anyone significantly ill.

Volunteers are also kept safe by daily monitoring and access to medical care once they are infected, Morrison said.

Would authorities allow this?

While there are currently no plans for a public study in the US, several politicians and volunteers are pushing for this, and the World Health Organization (WHO) has released a document to set out criteria for an ethically acceptable plan.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has never allowed a trial of this type for a disease this new, especially without a specific cure, but hasn’t ruled out the possibility completely. Right now, they are open to the idea, but advise caution.

“Human challenge studies are a way to expedite the development of a vaccine to prevent Covid-19,” the FDA stated in an article. “Because these studies involve exposing volunteers to the virus, the studies raise a variety of potential scientific, feasibility, and ethical issues. The FDA will work with those who are interested in conducting human challenge trials to help them evaluate these issues.”

Dr Matthew Memoli, director of clinical studies at the Laboratory of Infectious Diseases at the National Institutes of Health, also stated that a human challenge trial of this type might be pursued as the pandemic is rapidly changing our society.

Image credit: Unsplash

Share Button

Coronavirus: Low level of transplants sparks concern

The number of organ transplants in the UK last month was the lowest for 36 years, figures show.

Share Button

Coronavirus: Care home deaths ‘starting to decline’

Care home deaths fall 12% in past week with ministers expressing “relief” cases may have peaked.

Share Button

Health24.com | Coronavirus crisis has fewer kids getting needed vaccines

Fear of exposure to Covid-19 appears to be exacting an unexpected toll on public health: Childhood vaccination rates have plummeted, leaving millions at risk for other life-threatening illnesses.

“We’re seeing a general drop in paediatrician visits of 70% to 80% – and that’s very concerning,” said Dr Sara Goza, president of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). She added that the pandemic has prompted many parents to skip “well visits” for their little ones.

Babies under age two traditionally get check-ups this time of year, and older kids get vaccinated for summer camp. But not this spring, she said.

Dr Sean O’Leary, an associate professor of paediatrics-infectious diseases at the University of Colorado, in Aurora, agreed. “Most practices are seeing a huge drop,” he said.

Public health disaster

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is trying to get a handle on the pandemic’s effect on childhood vaccine rates.

“We are currently examining the impact on a national level,” said Dr Melinda Wharton of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. The agency’s findings and additional guidance will be published in the next several weeks, she added.

Evidence of a potential public health disaster is already more than anecdotal. The New York Times reported last week on a paediatric vaccine survey by the Physician’s Computer Company (PCC), a paediatric electronic health records firm.

PCC contacted 1 000 independent paediatricians to collect pre-Covid vaccine numbers as well as current vaccination rates. Vaccine figures from the week ending on 16 February were compared to those from the week ending on 5 April.

The upshot: Diphtheria and whooping cough shots were down 42%, human papillomavirus (HPV) shots fell 73%, and vaccination for measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) dropped 50%, according to the Times.

The recent drop-off is worrisome, because it follows a wave of vaccine resistance dating to the late 20th century. The refusal of some parents to vaccinate their kids on health and religious grounds has led to a return of infectious diseases that had been eradicated or nearly so.

High vaccination rates

“This really is an impending crisis,” O’Leary said.

The MMR shot is a must-have paediatric vaccine, experts say. It’s a two-dose immunisation, with the first shot given between 12 and 15 months of age, followed by a second round between four and six years of age. The idea that thousands of kids are missing their shots is very troubling, O’Leary said.

“For decades, the US has maintained very high vaccination rates overall, despite the impression you might get from recent coverage about certain pockets of the country refusing to get their children vaccinated,” he said.

To prevent disease outbreaks, vaccine coverage must be high. Typically, more than 90% of people must get their shots for so-called “herd immunity” to kick in. For the most part, O’Leary said, “that’s what we’ve been able to do”.

Now, Goza said, that society-wide protection is at risk.

“The fear is that our whole vaccine structure can crumble if parents don’t bring their children in,” she explained.

Patient visits down

Goza and O’Leary said several forces are keeping recent vaccine rates down: Parents are worried about going out during the pandemic; like other businesses, some paediatric offices have had the financial rug pulled out from under them; and some now offer only emergency care.

O’Leary noted that the CDC and AAP have advised paediatricians not to stop vaccinating.

But with patient visits down, some practices are struggling to pay their staff and might not even be able to afford vaccines, he pointed out. “A lot of practices are struggling or simply shutting their doors,” O’Leary said.

So what’s the prescription?

Some point to a renewed interest in physician house calls, or even drive-by vaccinations. But both Goza and O’Leary said the imperative must be to restore parental confidence in the safety of child-treatment facilities.

“Paediatricians are going above and beyond to make our spaces safe,” Goza said. “We’re constantly cleaning between patients, and using personal protective devices as needed. We’re triaging with sick patients via telehelp, to keep them outside of the office, or even seeing them in the parking lot.”

Afraid for ‘little ones’

Staggering sick-patient appointments and well-visits is another tactic, she said, as is maintaining separate care spaces or entrances.

Like hospital emergency departments, paediatric offices also operate under the assumption that anyone can be a Covid-19 spreader, O’Leary said.

“Nobody wants their staff or patients to get sick, and everyone has quickly ramped up to do what needs to be done to provide safe care – all of which means the likelihood of Covid transmission in a paediatrician’s office is actually very low,” he said.

Goza said she’s afraid for the little ones whose shots are getting skipped.

“We have to get the message out, because I worry about the young children, the babies,” she said, recalling the days before vaccination was available for the brutal and sometimes deadly disease meningitis. “I remember those days. And I don’t want to go back,” Goza said.

Image credit: iStock

Share Button

Health24.com | Have heart failure? Take precautions during pandemic

Heart failure raises the risk of complications and death from Covid-19, and requires extra vigilance during the pandemic, the American Heart Association (AHA) says.

More than six million people in the United States have heart failure. It occurs when the heart no longer pumps blood as well as it should.

“When the cardiac system is weakened by heart failure and unable to maintain normal efficiency, it can be susceptible to the inflammatory stress induced by a viral infection like Covid-19,” Dr Jacob Chemmalakuzhy said in an association news release. He’s medical director of advanced heart failure and transplant cardiology at Medical City Heart Hospital in Plano, Texas.

Another concern is that people with heart failure may have a weakened immune system.

Do these things every day

If you have heart failure, the AHA says you must manage your symptoms and report significant changes to your health care provider team. This enables the team to monitor your symptoms – which can be done via telemedicine – before deciding if you should go to a hospital.

According to the association, people with heart failure should do these things every day:

  • Weigh yourself and report increases of 2–3 pounds to your health care team
  • Monitor any swelling in the legs
  • Monitor shortness of breath
  • Watch for chest pain
  • Assess whether you can do the same level of physical activity as the previous day
  • Make sure you get enough restful sleep

As much as possible, people with heart failure should avoid exposure to others due to the risk of Covid-19.

Because of this, the heart association also offered suggestions for people who can’t make in-person visits to loved ones with heart failure.

You can keep in touch virtually or by phone to see how your loved one is doing. Mention the need to do daily self-checks and to take prescribed medications.

Virtual appointments

Make a plan in case your loved one develops Covid-19 symptoms: Have him or her call their health care team to find out the next steps for care and testing.

People with heart failure also need to know to call 911 if they have life-threatening symptoms, such as shortness of breath that comes on suddenly and does not resolve with rest, or is paired with chest pain, dizziness or lightheadedness.

Help your loved one with virtual appointments if in-person appointments aren’t an option. Set up a conference call so you can listen in and ask questions, and ask the healthcare provider for guidance if there is an immediate need for tests and visits.

Offer to get groceries and do other outside errands for your loved one, or offer to arrange grocery deliveries.

Image credit: 

Share Button