Air pollution is one of the world’s most dangerous health risks

Polluted air is a public health hazard that cannot be evaded. It is widely known that long-term exposure to air pollution enhances the risks of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. Scientists from the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry and the University Medical Center Mainz now calculated in a new study that the global, public loss of life expectancy caused by air pollution is higher than many other risk factors such as smoking, infectious diseases or violence.

Air pollution caused 8.8 million premature deaths worldwide in 2015. This corresponds to an average reduction in life expectancy per capita of 2.9 years. In comparison, tobacco smoking reduces the life expectancy by an average of 2.2 years (7.2 million deaths), HIV / AIDS by 0.7 years (1 million deaths), parasitic and vector-borne diseases such as malaria — by 0.6 years (600,000 deaths). “Air pollution exceeds malaria as a cause of premature death by a factor of 19; it exceeds violence by a factor of 17 and HIV / AIDS by a factor of 9. Given the huge impact on public health and the global population, one could say that our results indicate an air pollution pandemic,” said Jos Lelieveld, director at Max Planck Institute for Chemistry and first author of the study.

This study is the first to examine the global impact of air pollution on human health compared to other risk factors worldwide. “Our comparison of different global risk factors shows that ambient air pollution is a leading cause of premature mortality and loss of life expectancy, in particular through cardiovascular diseases,” says Thomas Münzel, director of the Cardiology Center at the University Medical Center in Mainz and co-author of the paper.

Relationship between pollution and disease

The scientists examined the connection between exposure to pollutants and the occurrence of diseases. In order to calculate the worldwide exposure to pollutants, which primarily include fine particles and ozone, the researchers used an atmospheric chemical mode. They then combined the exposure data with the Global Exposure — Mortality Model that derives from many epidemiological cohort studies. Using these tools and data, scientists investigated the effects of different pollution sources, distinguishing between natural (wildfires, aeolian dust) and anthropogenic emissions, including fossil fuel use. Based on their results they could estimate the disease-specific excess mortality and loss of life expectancy in all countries world-wide.

The study results show that the mortality caused by ambient air pollution is highest in East Asia (35 percent) and South Asia (32 percent), followed by Africa (11 percent), Europe (9 percent) and North- and South America (6 percent). Lowest mortality rates are found in Australia (1,5 percent) associated with the strictest air quality standards of all countries. “We understand more and more that fine particles primarily favor vascular damage and thus diseases such as heart attack, stroke, cardiac arrhythmia and heart failure. It is of outmost importance that air pollution is adopted as a cardiovascular risk factor and that it is distinctly mentioned in the ESC/AHA guidelines of prevention, acute and coronary syndromes and heart failure,” continued Münzel.

Avoidable deaths

According to the findings of the study, almost two thirds of the deaths caused by air pollution, namely around 5.5 million a year are avoidable, and the majority of polluted air comes from the use of fossil fuels. The researchers estimate that the average life expectancy world-wide would increase by more than a year if the emissions from the use of fossil fuels were eliminated.

The team from the University Medical Center Mainz and Max Planck Institute for Chemistry published a similar paper last year focusing on the consequences of air pollution in Europe. According to the earlier study, nearly 800,000 Europeans die prematurely every year due to illnesses caused by air pollution. Polluted air shortens the lifespan of Europeans by more than two years.

Story Source:

Materials provided by Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Share Button

Two-faced bacteria

The gut microbiome, which is a collection of numerous beneficial bacteria species, is key to our overall well-being and good health. Recent studies have linked the gut microbiome with several beneficial properties, such as aiding in the development of our immune system and warding off pathogen infections.

Many deadly pathogens are motile, meaning they can move spontaneously, and their ability to infect is based on their response to different environmental cues. Major cues for the pathogens are the molecules (or metabolites) produced in the gut. Pathogens interpret distinctive metabolites differently and are either attracted or repelled by them (i.e., migrate toward or away from them).

The metabolite indole is an example of a microbiome-produced small molecule that is abundant in the gut and is a powerful repellent for bacteria. According to Dr. Pushkar Lele, assistant professor, and Dr. Arul Jayaraman, professor, in the Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering at Texas A&M University, this fact led to a simple question: “Why does indole — which is produced by many of our beneficial bacterial species — not repel the good gut bacteria along with the bad ones?”

To answer this question, a research team including Lele, Jayaraman and Dr. Michael Manson from the Department of Biology at Texas A&M, studied the response of the beneficial gut bacteria, E. coli to indole. In an article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the researchers describe the discovery of a previously unknown response to indole, in which the molecule seems to both repel and attract bacteria. This Janus response — named after the Roman god Janus who had two faces, one looking into the future and one looking into the past — has to do with the way indole is interpreted by the bacterial chemo-receptors.

“We found that there are two receptors in E. coli that sense indole,” Lele said. “One senses indole as a repellent, and one senses indole as an attractant. Sustained exposure to high concentrations of indole desensitizes the receptor that interprets it as a repellent. This leads to indole being sensed only as an attractant.”

According to Jayaraman, the Janus response displays a large amount of sophistication, and the discovery could lead to a better understanding of the complexities of the gut microbiome. “Beneficial bacteria aggregate on the surfaces within the gut based on some common feature,” said Jayaraman. “We propose that one such feature is the ability to produce or sense indole. Bacteria that produce indole could group together and be attracted to niches where indole concentrations are high.”

Since the bacteria that produce indole in the gut typically are enmeshed in mucus layers among other bacteria, the indole concentration drops as one gets further away from the source of indole. Since pathogens tend to pass through the gut relatively far from the bacteria that produce indole, they are not likely to encounter high concentrations of indole for a sustained period. Therefore, they are not sensitized to indole, and any indole they encounter repels them.

Studies continue to show that it is important to have a diverse mix of beneficial bacteria in the gut. According to Lele, this research is a step toward understanding how the gut microbiome might change with time. “The key question is, ‘How do different species of bacteria colonize specific niches?’ We have addressed a part of that question,” said Lele. “The next step is to examine the response of multiple species of bacteria to a mix of different metabolites that are found in the gut.”

Story Source:

Materials provided by Texas A&M University. Original written by Drew Thompson. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Share Button

Reducing Mental Effort – Part 4

Our series on reducing mental effort continues.

Solve problems fully

Incompletes and stress go hand-in-hand. When we’re stressed, we often want to race to the end of a project or task and call it done when it’s really 90% or 95% of the way to done. But even 99% done isn’t actually done.

Some projects – like Disneyland – are never fully done because they’re ongoing and always evolving. But other projects like writing and publishing an ebook can be fully completed. And of course there’s a gray area in the middle with some projects having a reasonably well-defined completion state along with long-term maintenance activities.

To the best of your abilities, try to clearly define the completion state for your projects. What is the very last action step, the completion of which marks the true finish line? When do you really get to call it over and done? When do you get to celebrate? When does your mind have permission to let go of thinking about it?

If you get a project to 99% completion, your mind can’t fully let it go. Some of your mental RAM is still churning over that remaining 1%, and this can continue to be an ongoing distraction.

If you possibly can, drive the rest of the project fully across the finish line, so you can really check it off as fully done. Otherwise if it’s distracting you emotionally, use the method from yesterday’s post to pre-process the distracting thoughts and feelings when they start nagging at you. Better yet is to process this task into a system, so you can continue tracking it outside of your mind.

When incompletes pile up, the background feeling of stress and anxiety can increase as well. Even if you don’t feel it much, you may notice that your mind isn’t as clear and sharp as it is when you’re at your best. Some of your mental energy is being wasted on refreshing all of these incompletes.

Now and then it can be wise to make a list of your incompletes and take a few weeks (or months) to drive as many of them as you can across the finish line.

Even when older items don’t seem urgent, they can still nag at you repeatedly. The best way to bring that nagging to an end is to fully finish them, all the way to 100% done.

When you bring a task or project all the way across the finish line, it’s very satisfying. You can feel this sense of relief in your mind when you’re able to finally let go of the project. Extra energy is freed up – energy that can now flow towards something else.

Pause the inflow

Sometimes we have too much inflow relative to our outflow, and we need to pause the inflow to process the backlog. If the size of your backlog is getting to you, and you’re becoming overly stressed and distracted, it may be wise to reduce your inflow.

Now and then I go into a mode where I say “no more yeses” for a while. I turn down most invitations, and I do my best not to accept or open new projects. I focus on clearing older items off my plate and closing open loops till I’ve freed up more capacity. This eventually leads to the point where I feel ready to start taking on something new, and then I go into a phase of saying yes more often.

I know it’s a good sign when I start feeling enthusiastic about new directions, new invitations, and new creative projects. When I start to dread new items being added to my plate, I know I need to tighten up a bit. If I start feeling a little bored with the routine, I know it’s time to invite some fresh inflow.

We can adjust the inflow that comes into our lives by being more resistant to decrease the inflow or more welcoming to increase the inflow. Of course this may be more effective in some areas of life than others. Sometimes the inflow just happens, and we have to deal with it. But other times we can pull back a little to free up more capacity.

When taking on a big project or dealing with a significant lifestyle change, it’s wise to adjust expectations regarding your capacity, so you don’t overextend yourself. When I’m creating a major new course (like I’m doing now with the Stature course, which is up to 47 published lessons so far), that takes a lot of focus every week. It’s predictable that during such times, I’ll have reduced capacity for other projects. Consequently, I’m more selective in my commitments when there’s a big project front and center. I know from experience just how easy it is to become overcommitted, so I like to be extra cautious about that.

Many new parents learn that having a baby can greatly reduce their capacity to invest as much in other areas of life. There’s a feeling of pulling inward towards the family during the first several months, and this effect may continue for many years albeit to a lesser extent. It’s easy to underestimate just how much a new baby can take over your life, so it’s wise to free up extra capacity and not take on major new projects when the baby is expected. Overcommitting yourself could easily lead to great stress and even more fatigue.

I know it can be difficult to pause the inflow sometimes, especially if you’re an ambitious person, and you like to keep driving major projects forward. It can be hard to slow down sometimes, knowing that some parts of life aren’t going to advance much.

Another issue is when you feel like you’re behind relative to where you’d like to be in life, and you experience a life event like a major illness or a new baby that reduces your capacity even more. This can lead to feeling frustrated or impatient, wanting to push even harder to advance.

But if you can learn to surrender during these times, it can be very beneficial. Often these are times of incubation. When your mind gets a chance to slow down and rest more, you can set yourself up nicely for times of great flow and enthusiasm afterwards.

There’s a certain wisdom to life, and it will often slow us down when what we’re doing isn’t all that effective anyway. If you’re running on a treadmill, and life keeps drawing you away from it, you could see this as an invitation to question whether you want to stick with the treadmill going forward.

I’ve notice the pattern that work that feels aligned still feels aligned when I need to slow down. In fact, sometimes it feels even more aligned when I slow down.

I hope you’re still enjoying this little series on reducing mental effort. I’m enjoying writing it. 🙂

We’ll continue with Part 5 tomorrow.

Share Button

Charlotte Nokes death: Peterborough Prison mental health ‘concerns’

HMP Peterborough is told to avoid segregating mentally ill inmates and to tackle drug smuggling.

Share Button

Coronavirus: UK moving towards ‘delay’ phase of virus plan as cases hit 115

Measures will be ramped up to slow the spread of coronavirus as the UK moves past the “contain” phase.

Share Button

Health24.com | Is coronavirus really like the flu? Here’s a comparison

President Donald Trump drew a direct comparison between the seasonal flu and the new coronavirus in his first press conference on Covid-19, saying that Americans might have more to fear from flu than the headline-making virus.

But a closer comparison of the two viruses creates a more worrisome picture of what could happen if Covid-19 virus becomes widespread in the United States, infectious disease experts say.

The new coronavirus is more infectious than the flu and appears to strike with much higher severity in certain vulnerable groups.

At the same time, there are no treatments on hand for Covid-19 as there are for the seasonal flu, experts added.

In line with pandemic flu strains

Initially, estimates on the death rate in China hovered around 2%, but a report published last week in the New England Journal of Medicine arrived at a death rate of 1.4%. And leading health experts wrote in an accompanying editorial that many mild cases have been missed, driving the death rate down closer to around 1%.

The death rate associated with a typical flu season is around 0.1%, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The apparent death rate of the new coronavirus is more in line with pandemic flu strains, where a new mutation causes the flu virus to become more contagious and dangerous, experts explained.

For example, the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic, caused by the first emergence of the H1N1 flu strain, had a death rate greater than 2.5%, according to the CDC.

“Influenza doesn’t have the same mortality rate right now as Covid-19,” said Dr Aaron Glatt, an expert with the Infectious Diseases Society of America. “Both can be fatal. There’s an awful lot more flu around, but thank God it’s not as dangerous as Covid-19.”

Older folks much more at risk

There’s one important difference – Covid-19 appears to be most harmful to old people or those with underlying health problems that make them more susceptible to infection or pneumonia, Glatt added.

“No child has died of Covid-19,” Glatt said. “There have been hundreds of cases and not one child under the age of 10 has died from Covid-19.”

By comparison, 125 children in the United States have died from the flu this season, the CDC says.

One other important difference: The new coronavirus appears to be more infectious than the seasonal flu, experts said.

People carrying the new coronavirus appear to spread the infection, on average, to an additional 2.2 people, federal health officials said in a recent letter in the New England Journal of Medicine.

That’s again on par with the pandemic 1918 Spanish flu, in which each infected person, on average, passed the virus on to between two and three people, said Dr Waleed Javaid, director of infection prevention and control at Mount Sinai Downtown in New York City.

A virus new to humans

That figure for the regular seasonal flu is around 1.3 new people infected for every person with the flu, according to a 2014 paper in BMC Infectious Diseases.

The 1957 (1.6), 1968 (1.8) and 2009 (1.5) influenza pandemics also had lower infection rates than the coronavirus, according to data from that paper.

People also shouldn’t assume that the coronavirus will fade as winter turns to spring turns to summer, as happens with the seasonal flu, said Marc Lipsitch, a professor of epidemiology with the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

“As a virus new to humans, [the coronavirus] will face less immunity and thus transmit more readily even outside of the winter season,” Lipsitch added. “Changing seasons and school vacation may help, but are unlikely to stop transmission.

“Like pandemic flu, it might transmit widely outside of season,” Lipsitch noted.

Transmission through mucous membranes

Both the new coronavirus and the flu spread in the same way, mainly through droplet transmission, Javaid said.

“If I sneeze or I cough, small respiratory particles fly into the air about three to six feet and fall to the ground,” Javaid said. “Within those three to six feet, people can get exposed.”

When those droplets land on a surface, they can be picked up by someone’s hand touching that surface. If the person touches their eyes, nose or mouth, the virus can be transmitted thorough the mucous membranes, Javaid explained.

“We all touch our faces more than 20 times an hour. Every four or five minutes we are touching our face. I touched my face twice talking to you, already,” Javaid said.

Carriers without symptoms

In another similarity, people carrying either virus can walk around without showing any active symptoms.

As many as three out of four people carrying the seasonal flu have no symptoms, according to a 2014 British study published in The Lancet.

People infected with either virus might be contagious before symptoms develop, making it difficult to control their spread, Javaid said.

When symptoms occur, Covid-19 virus appears to be more akin to the common cold than the flu. Coronavirus symptoms include fever, cough and shortness of breath, all of which may appear between two and 14 days after exposure, the CDC says.

The flu has those symptoms as well as sore throat, muscle aches, headaches and fatigue, the CDC says.

People with the flu have one important advantage, in that antiviral drugs like Tamiflu are available to reduce the length and severity of their illness, Glatt noted.

No similar antiviral is yet available to treat Covid-19 or the virus causing it. However, a coalition of European researchers found there are as many as 31 approved antiviral drugs that could potentially be effective against Covid-19.

No vaccination available

Repurposing these drugs as a Covid-19 therapy would have “a substantially higher probability of success to market as compared with developing new virus-specific drugs and vaccines, and a significantly reduced cost and timeline to clinical availability,” the researchers wrote in the International Journal of Infectious Disease.

Glatt said he’s not optimistic that an antiviral that’s effective against the coronavirus will be found quickly.

“I doubt, although there’s a lot of effort being put into it, that we’re going to come up with an antiviral right away for the treatment of Covid-19,” Glatt said. “Who knows, but I wouldn’t count on that.”

By the same token, there’s a vaccine for the flu, but a vaccine for coronavirus won’t be available for a year at the earliest, according to Dr Anthony Fauci, director of the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Given that, the best prevention for the coronavirus appears to be the same as for the common cold, experts said – wash your hands frequently, avoid contact with sick people, cover your cough or sneeze with your elbow to prevent hand contamination, and stay home if you’re ill.

People who have chronic illnesses should make sure their disease is under control, to prevent their infection risk, Javaid said. For example, people who have diabetes should make sure their diabetes is under control.

Image credit: iStock

Share Button

Health24.com | 5 ways to choose a diet that is right for you

Someone is classified as obese when their body mass index (someone’s weight-to-height ratio) is more than 30.

And while the body mass index has been criticised by medical experts in recent years as not being an accurate portrayal of someone’s total health, an unhealthy weight can, however, take its toll on your health as it increases your risk for chronic diseases such as hypertension and diabetes type 2. 

Unfortunately, losing weight isn’t as easy as it sounds. We are inundated by so many fad diets and weight-loss products that it’s easy to become confused. We also want to see quick results and tend to reach for anything that offers the promise of quick weight loss. 

However, it’s not only a healthy weight that is key to optimum health. Your lifestyle as a whole needs a complete overhaul.

Here are some pointers to help you choose the best lifestyle for you:  

1. You should be able to maintain your regimen

Unless you have chosen a diet or eating plan that you can follow indefinitely, you are likely to return to your bad old ways when you’ve reached your goal with the new diet. Before you know it, you will be back at your old weight. 

What you really want is to start a diet that isn’t really a diet at all, but rather a lifestyle change. Weight loss is very exciting and motivating, but once you get to weight maintenance, the novelty has worn off and it may become a challenge to stick to the changes you made.

Your new weight is only viewed as “permanent” once you have managed to keep it off for an entire year. The National Weight Control Registry is a long-term study which currently observes over 10 000 people who have lost a significant amount of weight and managed to keep it off. This is what they did to maintain their weight:

  • 78% eat breakfast every day.
  • 75% weigh themselves at least once a week.
  • 62% watch less than ten hours of TV per week.
  • 90% exercise, on average, about one hour per day.

2. Eat to fight disease, not feed it

A “healthy diet” needs to adhere to a number of principles. The most important is that most of your food should be minimally processed (eaten as it is found in nature) and be predominantly plant based.

Here are some more practical suggestions to promote good health:

  • Mix up your meals. Eat a variety of foods and not just “the same old” on repeat. Different foods contain different vitamins, minerals and anti-oxidants and therefore variety is essential in order to obtain a range of nutrients.
  • Move it! Be physically active for at least 30 minutes per day.
  • Make starchy foods the basis of most meals. There is a catch here – portions should be kept small (half a cup to one cup) and these options should be unprocessed, whole grain and high in fibre.
  • Eat plenty of plants. Aim for at least five portions of vegetables and fruits per day, giving preference to vegetables. You will benefit from the satiety value they provide, their fibre content as well as the wide range of nutrients they contain. Strive for variety.
  • Incorporate at least one meat-free meal per week into your routine. Eat beans, chickpeas, soy and lentils regularly.
  • Chicken, all types of fish, low fat dairy, lean meat or eggs can be eaten daily – but, control the portions of your proteins – two to three matchbox-sized portions will suffice for most adults.
  • Include healthy fats in your diet. Give preference to heart-healthy monounsaturated fats such as olives, olive oil, canola oil, nuts and avocado. 
  • Drink six to eight glasses of water daily. If you want to have a “tipple”, be sensible about how much. A recommended guideline is no more than one unit of alcohol for women per day, and no more than two for men.
  • Skip the salt (or at least use it sparingly).
  • Try and quit sugar. If you can’t, use small amounts and not between meals.

3. Eat a diet that’s within your budget

It’s important to be able to maintain your diet, not only from a mental perspective, but also an economic one.

We tend to think that a healthy diet should consist of expensive superfoods. A healthy lifestyle can (and should), however, be cost-effective.

To save on your food budget, try focusing less on grass-fed, organic and “free from” foods (free from gluten/wheat/lactose etc.), and rather include minimally processed whole foods that are seasonal, that can be bought in bulk (and shared). You can also start a vegetable garden.   

Small changes in your shopping list can have a significant effect on the weight of your wallet. Take for example swapping your fillet of salmon, for a few pilchards (the omega-3 content is similar). The cost per portion will drop from R40 to R3.50. 

A similarly easy swap with very little impact on health outcome is swapping your olive oil (R150/L) for canola oil (R22/L).

4. Don’t turn into a hermit

Is your diet one that can only be followed if you dedicate all your time to preparing intricate meals? Is socialising difficult because of all your restrictions? 

Although you may be able to follow a complicated and restrictive for a short period of time, eventually your need to socialise and be with others will take over and adherence to your diet will wane.

Find a way of eating that doesn’t just suit you, but also your family, and allows you the flexibility to eat with others.

5. Don’t choose an unsafe and unsustainable fad diet

If the new diet you have decided to embark on has one or more of the following characteristics, you may be chasing a fad diet which is both unsafe and unsustainable:

  • It offers an easy magic solution without having to make many lifestyle changes.
  • It promises rapid weight loss of more than 1kg a week.
  • It promises foods with “fat burning” properties (such as the grapefruit diet).
  • It promotes the avoidance or severe restriction of major food groups.
  • It promotes eating mainly one type of food (such as cabbage soup or eggs).
  • It eliminates major food groups.
  • It recommends eating foods in particular combinations according to your blood type.
  • It recommends detoxing or juicing.
  • It offers no supporting evidence.
  • It recommends eating non-food items such as cotton wool (there are some bizarre diets out there).
  • The same diet is recommended for everyone without accounting for specific needs such as age, gender, body size and activity levels.

If you need help on your journey to a healthier weight and lifestyle, our nutritional experts at Nutrition Solutions are there to help you. Ask them a question here, or visit their website. 

Image credit: iStock

NEXT ON HEALTH24X

Share Button

Coronavirus: California declares emergency after death

A 71-year-old man, who was on a cruise ship last month, dies in a hospital near Sacramento.

Share Button

NHS is ‘failing’ patients living with HIV

A report from members of Parliament says progress in reducing transmissions could be reversed.

Share Button

Reducing Mental Effort – Part 3

Our series on reducing mental effort continues.

Pre-process distractions

What do you do when you’re distracted by emotions or other circular thoughts, and you can’t be very productive?

Some people say to just push through and do your work anyway. I’ve tried this and found that it hasn’t worked well for me. I can work a bit, but if my mind keeps dwelling on something else, I’m certainly not working at full engagement. But nor do I like taking a full day just to deal with emotional processing.

So here’s a good solution: Devote a modest amount of time to pre-process whatever is distracting you. You may not have time to resolve it fully, but you can process those thoughts and feelings well enough to prevent them from distracting you throughout your day.

Grab three pieces of blank paper and a pen, and simply write out your thoughts and feelings as they come to you. Keep going until all three pages are full. Listen to whatever your mind wants to say, and flow it onto the page.

This normally takes me about 45 minutes, so roughly 15 minutes per page. It’s fine to pause and think now and then, but try not to pause too long. Just keep emptying the contents of your mind onto the page till all three pages are full.

You don’t have to solve anything. Again, you’re just emptying the contents of your mind onto the page. Let the parts of your mind that have been distracting you have their full say.

Be absolutely candid. Swear onto the page if you’d like. Be as honest as you can about what you’re thinking and feeling. Assume that no one will ever read what you’re writing. This is for you and you alone.

When you’re done writing three full pages, you can read them over if you like. If you see any actionable ideas, you can capture them on a separate page and later process them into your system that we mentioned in Part 2 of this series.

Afterwards I recommend that you destroy those three page, such as by shredding them. If you establish the habit of always destroying the pages afterwards, it will encourage you to be even more candid each time, which makes the exercise more effective the more you practice it. If you censor yourself as you write, it will be less effective.

The main benefit of this exercise is that it moves cluttered thoughts and feelings into the logical part of your brain. In order to write down these thoughts, you have to linearize them. You have to think about them differently than if you simply allow them to bobble around in your mind. Writing them down helps to move the energy out of the mental circuits that are causing circular thinking. It helps your mind let go and restore a sense of peace.

For really severe cases of circular thoughts and feelings, you may need to do this exercise for a few days in a row. Usually two or three days is plenty to create a serious reduction in the amount of distraction you experience.

When I do this simple exercise, I usually find that it’s well worth the time. If I think I might need to do it, it’s wise to do it. Afterwards I feel calm and peaceful.

You might be wondering if you can just do this on a computer or other device because it will be faster. It will indeed be faster, but my experience is that it’s also much less effective. Handwriting engages more of the brain than typing because you have to form the individual letters rather than just pushing buttons. Somehow this makes the mental processing work much better. It would say that writing is roughly three times as effective as typing, so I’d only recommend typing if you’re really short on time and you barely feel distracted.

Taking 45 minutes to make several hours a lot more productive seems like a fair tradeoff. And if you’d otherwise be worrying about something for days, then the payoff is even higher.

Many problems can arise during your day that knock you off balance. If you can effectively set them aside, then great – do that. But if you’re still feeling distracted a few hours later, and you notice that your productivity is suffering for it, it may be worth the time to pause, pre-process those distracting thoughts and feelings, and then return to your original work. This method is especially helpful when you don’t have time to fully resolve a new issue that comes up, and you need to stick to your original priorities with good focus.

We’ll continue with Part 4 of this series tomorrow.

Share Button