Assistance during first years of biology major leads to higher retention of first-gen students

For many young college students, the first years are a time of wonder and excitement and early steps toward long-term goals. These years, for some students, are equally fraught with anxiety, as the realities of rigorous curricula set in alongside feelings of unpreparedness and impostor syndrome. In the STEM fields, this results in roughly 50% of first-year majors leaving their original course of study.

This is a disheartening statistic, especially given the projected need for a 33% increase in the number of STEM-degree holders nationwide to support the industries of the future. Also disheartening: Those that leave their majors are disproportionately first-generation and underrepresented students, which is contributing to a lack of diversity in both industry and at advanced levels of research.

It doesn’t have to be this way, say Mike Wilton and Eduardo Gonzalez-Niño, lecturers in the UC Santa Barbara Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology. In a paper published in the journal CBE-Life Sciences Education, the pair and their colleagues demonstrate that an active learning approach — the use of tactics such as in-class iClickers, small group discussions and peer-reviewed writing assignments — early in the biological sciences improves grades in the short-term and increases student retention in biology over the long-term.

“All students that are admitted here to UC Santa Barbara are capable of pursuing the biology major, otherwise the university would not have admitted them,” said Wilton, who, with the rest of his team, has been running the BioMentors program for undergraduate biology majors since 2015.

Unfortunately, the researchers said, that sense of belonging is often lost in the mix as students — many of whom are the first in their family to attend university — navigate large class sizes, a fast-paced quarter system and a multitude of hurdles they did not expect along the way.

“I also faced that conundrum,” Gonzalez-Niño said, thinking of his early years as a biology major. “Sometimes the background that these students have is not ideal — they came from high schools that didn’t prepare them for the rigor that you face in college.” In addition to feeling out of place in a completely new environment and not knowing who to turn to for help, he said, these students often perform badly, leading them to lose confidence in their abilities and to reconsider their major.

At UCSB, roughly 1,100 new undergraduates are admitted into the biology major each year; however, about 600 have tended to leave the major after their first two years of study. Wilton and Gonzalez-Niño wanted to see if they could keep undergrads from prematurely leaving by involving them in a more participatory style of learning.

In their three-year research project, cohorts of students participated in an alternative and parallel — but no less rigorous — introductory biology course that ran concurrently to the traditional lecture course. In addition to active learning strategies, the intervention course replaces a weekly lecture with a tutorial that focuses on historically difficult course concepts. These discussion-based tutorials are led by Wilton and Gonzalez-Niño with the assistance of upper-division biology students, called BioMentors, who model approaches and strategies for success.

“The thing that we try to instill the most is that we’re all in this together,” Wilton said.

Following three years’ worth of introductory biology students in both versions of the course, the researchers found significant benefits to those in the intervention section. For example, those in the intervention course outperformed their peers in the traditional lecture course by about 12% on common exam questions, and participation in the active learning program resulted in higher final course grades overall.

The students who participated in the active learning program also reported a “significantly higher perception of student belonging when compared with peers in the traditional section,” according to the study. Students attributed this to the “higher perceptions of faculty support” and classroom environment — i.e., how easy it is to share ideas and ask questions in lecture.

“The students in the active learning course were comfortable approaching us,” Gonzalez-Niño said. “They can tell that we’re on their side.”

Taken together, the improved performance and the greater sense of belonging, the researchers said, increased the likelihood that students would remain in the biology major. In fact, students in the intervention course were 10% more likely than their peers in the traditional lecture course to participate in the subsequent introductory biology course offered the following quarter.

A biology degree is broad and diverse enough to enable individuals to work in various fields that will need these STEM graduates. According to the researchers, there is a growing demand for biologists in the biomedical fields, environmental sciences, agriculture and nutrition, and in research that not only broadens our knowledge, but also can translate into innovation.

“A huge area of demand currently that is only projected to grow is healthcare,” Wilton noted. “If we can teach these students to navigate through their first gateway biology courses and help them pursue career in healthcare, that will be a productive future for a lot of students who are first-generation.”

In addition, Gonzalez-Niño said, assisting underrepresented students in overcoming hurdles to learning biology will boost diversity in the field.

“When you have people with the same background all think about the same questions, often there’s a limited number of answers that you can come up with,” he said. “But when you have a diverse group of people thinking about the same issues, then the answers to those issues become more creative and diverse.”

Share Button

As China rapidly adopts clean energy, use of traditional stoves persists

Old habits are hard to break. A McGill-led study of replacement of traditional wood and coal burning stoves with clean energy in China suggests that, without a better understanding of the reasons behind people’s reluctance to give up traditional stoves, it will be difficult for policies in China and elsewhere in the world to succeed in encouraging this shift towards clean energy. The study was published recently in Nature Sustainability.

China is ahead of most low- and middle-income countries in its energy transition: hundreds of millions of rural homes started using clean fuels such as electricity and gas in recent decades. Despite this, many Chinese homes continue using their traditional coal and wood-burning stoves — a trend that is common in many countries.

Traditional stoves linked to premature deaths and climate change

Air pollution from traditional stoves contributed to approximately 2.8 million premature deaths in 2017 and is a major contributor to regional climate change. Efforts made by governments, NGOs, and researchers to incentivize households to switch entirely to clean fuel stoves and give up their traditional stoves — even in highly controlled randomized trials — have largely failed.

“Families have used their traditional stoves for generations. People know what foods taste best with those stoves and how to best use them so that all energy needs are met,” said Jill Baumgartner, an Associate Professor in McGill’s Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health and the senior author on the study by an international team of researchers. “Clean fuel stoves do not always meet all of the energy uses provided by traditional stoves, and may also pose additional costs. The desire to continue using traditional stoves is also seen in the U.S. and Canada, where many homes still use wood fireplaces for space heating despite being well-equipped to only use gas and electric heaters.”

Giving up is hard to do

The researchers gathered data from over 700 homes in three provinces in China (Beijing, Shanxi and Guangxi) using a photo-based questionnaire, which allowed participants to point to each type of stove that they had ever owned. They then asked questions about the frequency and timing of use, as well as what fuel types they used with the household stoves.

“We were surprised by the number of stoves current used in different homes, sometimes up to 13 different cooking devices and 7 different heating stoves,” said Ellison Carter, the first author on the paper who is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Colorado State University. “We were also surprised to find that most homes that had first started using clean fuels well over a decade ago were still using their solid fuel stoves, again highlighting the enormous challenge of achieving exclusive use of clean fuel stoves.”

The researchers found that the factors associated with adoption of clean fuels were different from those associated with the suspension of traditional coal and wood burning stoves. The common traits among those who stopped using traditional stoves were that they tended to be younger, more educated, and had poorer self-reported health. Those who adopted clean technology tended either to be younger or retired, lived in smaller households, and had a higher income.

Looking at uptake of clean fuels at a global level

This study focused only on China, which is home to over 500 million solid fuel stove users. But an important question for the researchers is how generalizable these results from China are to other countries with different levels of economic development. They were recently awarded funding from the U.S. NIH to develop a framework on the household and community factors that can facilitate suspension of solid fuel stoves. For this work, they obtained a number of nationally-representative datasets on energy use from India, Cambodia, and number of countries in Sub-Saharan Africa to empirically assess this same question in other settings.

“We have good evidence from many countries on the policies and program that can promote the uptake of clean fuel stoves,” said Baumgartner. “We now need to better understand the individual or combinations of policies and programs that can accelerate the suspension of solid fuel stoves, particularly for the poorest and most vulnerable.”

Story Source:

Materials provided by McGill University. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Share Button

Artificial cells act more like the real thing

Protocells — artificial cells — that are active and mimic living cells by moving independently and that are biocompatible and enzymatically active are now possible using an improved method developed by Penn State researchers.

Living cells are difficult to grow in the laboratory, so researchers sometimes work with synthetic cells, but these have had research limitations because they lack real cell characteristics.

“One of the challenges of cell research is it’s sometimes very hard to run controlled experiments on a?cell’s motility, especially due to surface enzyme activity,” said Darrell Velegol, distinguished professor of chemical engineering. “The research team developed a simple way to make an artificial cell that doesn’t do everything a regular cell does, like reproduce, have genetic mutations or anything like that, but it actively moves. That’s important because how cells move is poorly understood, especially how enzymes’ activity play into cell movement.”

The team’s protocells are used to investigate how the activity of natural enzymes like ATPase can propel the active movement of the protocells. The biochemical process of ATPase enzyme involves conversion of ATP (adenosine triphosphate) into the product ADP (adenosine diphosphate). ATP is a complex organic chemical that provides energy for living cells and ADP is an organic compound that plays an important role in how cells release and store energy.

“Attempts at similar experiments in the past decade had the enzymes incorporated inside of micron-sized sacks called polymeric vesicles, or tethered onto the surface of hard particles,” said Subhadip Ghosh, postdoctoral researcher in chemistry. “But these attempts didn’t have significant biological resemblance like our protocells.”

In the research team’s experiments, the protocells have actual artificial membranes composed of a naturally occurring lipid called phosphatidylcholine. The ATPase enzymes were incorporated directly into the membrane.

“Our results basically give other researchers the first steps toward making artificial cells with enzymatic activity,” Ghosh said.

One unexpected result from the study, which was made available online in August 2019 ahead of final publication on September 11, 2019 in an issue of Nano Letters, happened during diffusion experiments which were performed at a single molecular regime. As expected, the movement of the protocells was low for low concentrations of ATP.

“Quite surprisingly, the movement of the protocells dropped significantly at high concentration of ATP,” said Ayusman Sen, the Verne M. Willaman Professor of Chemistry at Penn State.

According to the researchers, this was as counterintuitive as pressing an automobile’s gas pedal and having the vehicle slow down. After performing comprehensive control experiments, the researchers concluded that when ADP concentration is high, it may bind to the ATPase and suppress the substrate ATP activity, causing reduced motility.

Having the ability to fabricate the enzymatically active protocells opens new opportunities. Armed with these mimics of motile living cells, the researchers aim to reveal the fundamental mechanisms governing active membrane dynamics and cellular movement.?Given the current limited understanding of how cells move, including how enzyme action plays into cell movement, the research team members believe their work can have significant implications for future medical research.

“A key challenge is to estimate the mechanical forces that drive the protocell movement, and to discover changes in the enzyme structure during that process,” said Farzad Mohajerani, research assistant in chemical engineering. “Knowing that structure-function relationship for the movement of the protocells will enable their design for potential in vivo applications like medical sensing and lab analysis.”

Along with Ghosh, Mohajerani, Velegol and Sen, other Penn State researchers who participated in the study included Peter Butler, associate dean for education and graduate professional programs in the College of Engineering and professor of biomedical engineering, and Seoyoung Son, postdoctoral researcher in biomedical engineering.

The National Science Foundation’s Center for Chemical Innovation supported this research.

Story Source:

Materials provided by Penn State. Original written by Jamie Oberdick. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Share Button

Kate Beckinsale Hits Back at Trolls Who Say She’s Too Old to Post Bikini Pics

How old is too old to share swimsuit pics online? Correct answer: It’s not even something that should be a matter of debate. However, according to a few of Kate Beckinsale’s Instagram followers, 46 is definitely on the wrong side of the line.

They may––fortunately––be in the minority, but their opinions have caused a stir thanks to Beckinsale herself, who called them out after reading their comments on the photo she posted of herself in a swimsuit during a beach trip to Mexico.

After someone posted, “I feel like you are having a mid life crisis or something (sic),” the Underworld star hit back with, “Oh! I think that’s because you are an annoying a**hole.”

But that wasn’t the end of the conversation. The same commenter couldn’t help but add, “at least I have pretty green eyes and my youth.”

Over to you, Beckinsale: “Yes darling at least you have those XX.”

RELATED: Suzanne Somers Shares a Photo in Her Birthday Suit to Ring In Her 73rd Birthday

Another commenter accused the 46-year-old of being “too old” and suggested that she posted the pictures in order to get attention. This time, Beckinsale was ready with some first-class advice.

“Are you aware that when you get the urge to accuse someone of something, especially someone you don’t know, or attribute an intention without ever having met the person, that the only thing really being achieved is revealing something about yourself?” she wrote.

“I don’t know you and I don’t know who has made you feel that if you get older you have no value, can’t be attractive or sexy or have a relationship with your body that isn’t only self-loathing, but as one female to another, don’t let any of that noise bother you.”

RELATED: 6 Women Prove That Every Body Is Sexy in Empowering Photo Series 

It didn’t end there; Beckinsale was on a roll.

“You’ll feel more powerful, may well physically blossom, know who you are and what you want and get good at setting healthier boundaries,” she went on. “If you’re young and fearing getting older, don’t. It’s not at all how people scare you it will be especially for a woman. You’ll come into your own power in a way that feels steady and so many more things will be possible."

"The people or press that are scaring you that your value is tied up in youth, or in fact anything that is not currently within your reach, is noise I do hope you allow yourself to ignore. If you’re older and fearing less is available to you, it actually isn’t, don’t let that limit you in anything. I can’t imagine how unhappy you must feel to leave comments like this. People have all sorts of things going on that they put a brave face on and you’d never know.”

She ended her lengthy response from a place of love and positivity, showing that there’s a lot more to her than just a great swimsuit pic.

RELATED: Ashley Graham Clapped Back at Commenters After Posting a Cellulite Swimsuit Photo

“Sending love and the real hope you receive this message in the spirit that it’s met,” she said. “I know you have more to offer than leaving mean comments that illuminate far more about you than they do about the people you choose to comment on. Sending love x.”

Naturally, Beckinsale also racked up a whole lot of love in the comments. “If I looked like that, I would be posting bikini pics everyday! (sic)” wrote one. Another said, “Age is just a number. You look better than those so much younger.”

What more is there to say? Just… keep rocking those swimsuit pics.

To get our top stories delivered to your inbox, sign up for the Healthy Living newsletter
Share Button

What Are Caffeine Pills—And Are They Safe? 

As a student, I know caffeine pills run rampant on college campuses. Since we’re always on the go, popping a pill can be far more convenient than waiting in line for a cup of coffee.

Caffeine pills are easily accessible, portable, and cheap. You can buy a 100-count bottle of 200-milligram pills on Amazon or at your local pharmacy for as little as $6.55, and they're tiny enough to tuck away in any backpack. So it’s not surprising that college students rely on them to overcome morning fatigue, stave off an afternoon slump, or pull all-nighters.

Though there’s no denying the burst of energy you get from caffeine pills, the question is, are they healthy? Here's what you need to know.

What are caffeine pills?

As many people know, caffeine is a stimulant that acts on the central nervous system—nerves, brain and spinal cord—to make you feel more awake and alert.

Caffeine pills can be made of natural or synthetic caffeine. Some products may also contain inactive ingredients, such as fillers, coloring agents, emulsifiers, and other additives, says Rachel Link, RD, a nutritionist based in New York City.

Cynthia Sass, RD, Health nutrition editor, says while every type of pill is made differently, most have between 100 and 200 milligrams of caffeine. That’s less than a 20-ounce cup of Starbucks Dark Roast brewed coffee, which has about 340 milligrams. It’s more than a 12-ounce can of Coca-Cola, which has 34 milligrams. And it’s just about on par with a 16-ounce can of Monster Energy, which has 160 milligrams.

What’s the difference between caffeine pills and coffee?

There are a few significant differences between caffeine pills and coffee. Caffeine pills are “more accessible or portable than coffee, and some people don't like the taste of coffee or tea,” Sass says.

Because coffee can be so bitter, people often add creamer and sweetener. Popping a pill avoids the sugar shock and taste of coffee altogether. It’s also calorie free, which may be the appeal, Sass reasons.

Sometimes “coffee can also irritate the digestive tract” and “trigger heartburn,” says Link, which is why caffeine pills appeal to some people.

Coffee “enters the bloodstream through the stomach and small intestine and can have a stimulating effect as soon as 15 minutes after it is consumed,” according to the National Sleep Foundation.

RELATED: 9 Surprising Ways Caffeine Affects Your Health

Caffeine pills hit you faster since you take a caffeine supplement all at once, says Julie Upton, RD, co-founder of Appetite for Health in the San Francisco Bay area. And the caffeine crash can hit you harder since the pills “contain a more concentrated dose of caffeine than other drinks,” says Link.

Many caffeinated beverages contain beneficial compounds in addition to caffeine. For example, L-theanine, which is found in tea, helps to prevent adverse side effects of caffeine, says Link. Because caffeine pills lack these compounds, they increase a person’s risk of suffering from negative side effects, explains Link.

How much caffeine is too much?

Any amount of caffeine can be too much if it upsets your stomach, makes your heart race, causes you to lose sleep, or stokes other unpleasant side effects. It depends on how sensitive you are to caffeine's effects and how quickly you break down the drug.

For a healthy adult, up to 400 milligrams of caffeine a day is considered a safe amount, according to the FDA. This is the same as about four or five cups of coffee. Consuming higher doses can be risky for women who are pregnant or nursing; children and adolescents; and people with a chronic illness or disease, since certain conditions and medications can make people more sensitive and vulnerable to the effects of caffeine, the FDA points out.

Caffeine can be toxic if you take in too much too quickly. Serious effects, including seizures, have been linked to rapid consumption of about 1,200 milligrams, the FDA reports.

“The dangers are especially concerning if caffeine is taken in higher doses, combined with other stimulants, or under certain conditions, like existing high blood pressure,” Sass says.

RELATED: Caffeine Powder Overdose Leaves 21-Year-Old Dead—Here's What to Know

Several years ago, when energy drinks became all the rage, emergency departments began seeing patients who had consumed too much. Tens of thousands of people were seen for caffeine-related complications. A study on the effect of energy drinks found that most cases were due to excessive consumption in a short time period or when ingested with other stimulants, like alcohol.

In recent years, the FDA has slapped several manufacturers with warnings over pure and highly concentrated caffeine in liquid or powder forms. Such products have contributed to at least two deaths in the U.S.

What should you do if you have caffeine side effects?

High doses of caffeine can cause chills, agitation, dizziness, headache, vomiting, nausea, fainting, indigestion, lightheadedness, and seizures, according to the Mayo Clinic. You should check with your doctor immediately if any of these symptoms occur. You should get emergency help immediately if you show signs of overdose, which include irritability, nervousness, rapid heartbeat, and trouble sleeping. Other side effects, like a rash or dry skin, can occur but do not require medical attention.

What if it’s just a case of caffeine jitters? For minor caffeine ingestion, supportive measures, like drinking water and talking a walk, can help, Link suggests. More severe cases may require intravenous hydration or medications to treat irregular heart rhythm, for example. In life-threatening situations, dialysis may be the best option.

So, are caffeine pills safe?

Even though consuming up to 400 milligrams of caffeine a day is generally considered safe, it doesn’t mean it’s a healthy habit. It is possible to develop a dependence on caffeine pills, says Ryan D. Andrews, MS, RD, author of A Guide to Plant-Based Eating.

Sass and Link don’t recommend them because, they say, the risks outweigh the benefits. It’s much easier to consume too much caffeine, and caffeine supplements don’t provide the same beneficial compounds.

If you decide you want to try caffeine pills anyway, speak with your doctor first about whether or not they are the right way for you to get a caffeine fix.

To get our top stories delivered to your inbox, sign up for the Healthy Living newsletter

Share Button

This 21-Year-Old Student Is Accused of Persuading Her Boyfriend to Kill Himself—but Why Would Someone Do That?

Introducing Health's new column, Why Would Someone Do That? Here, psych experts decipher the reasons behind the most puzzling human behavior mysteries.

Alexander Urtula was supposed to walk in the commencement ceremony at Boston College on May 20 of this year. He never made it to the stage. Instead, 90 minutes before the ceremony, with his family waiting for him to arrive, the 22-year old jumped off the roof of a parking garage in Roxbury, Mass, just like his girlfriend had suggested—at least that’s what Suffolk County District Attorney Rachel Rollins believes happened.

Now, Rollins has charged 21-year old Inyoung You, a former Boston College student and resident of South Korea, with pushing Urtula to his death, not physically but psychologically through text messages—thousands and thousands of reportedly cruel, heartless text messages.

When looking through Urtula’s phone after his death, investigators found that the couple had exchanged more than 75,000 text messages over the course of their 18-month relationship. You had sent more than 47,000, and according to the DA, many of her messages suggested that Urtula “go kill himself” or “go die,” and they told him that she, his family, and the world would be better off without him.

You’s verbal and psychological abuse allegedly put Urtula into a depression so deep that it made him suicidal. Even when she was aware of his precarious mental state, she didn’t let up. “The abuse became more frequent, more powerful, and more demeaning in the days and hours leading up to Mr. Urtula’s death,” stated the DA’s office. On the day that Urtula killed himself, You had reportedly used her phone to track his location, and she was in the parking garage as he ultimately ended his young life.

RELATED: Why Do People Kill Themselves? These 5 Factors Help Explain It

While authorities agree that Urtula was the one who jumped, a Boston grand jury has indicted You for wanton and reckless behavior, creating “life-threatening conditions for Mr. Urtula that she had a legal duty to alleviate, which she failed to do.” And most of that abuse was done via cell phone.

Remarkably, it has happened before

You is not the first young woman to be charged with egging someone on to their death. Nor is she the first young woman from Massachusetts to be charged for sending text messages so vile they resulted in suicide. That dubious honor goes to Michelle Carter, who was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in 2017 when she was 17 for the death of her boyfriend, Conrad Roy III, who was 18 when he killed himself by carbon monoxide poisoning in his truck.

In that case, a jury found “sufficient evidence that Carter caused Conrad’s death by wantonly and recklessly assisting him in poisoning himself with carbon monoxide.” Carter began serving a 15-month sentence in February. The case drew national revulsion and eventually became the subject of an HBO documentary, I Love You, Now Die: The Commonwealth vs. Michelle Carter.

Roy's death inspired a Massachusetts state bill known as Conrad's Law, which would make it a crime, punishable by up to five years in prison, for anyone who "intentionally coerces or encourages" a suicide or a suicide attempt. In the wake of Urtula’s death, the law seems prescient and important. If two young women could have allegedly encouraged their boyfriends to their ends, could others? What could make someone so callous and cruel?

The easiest answer—and in some ways the most comforting—is that a person who could do this is simply a psychopath. As anyone who has watched enough Forensic Files knows, a psychopath is someone who “has exhibited persistent antisocial behavior, usually characterized by callous and unemotional traits,” Mitch Prinstein, PhD, an assistant dean at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and an expert in psychopathy tells Health.

RELATED: What’s the Difference Between a Psychopath and a Sociopath? An Expert Weights In

Prinstein, however, is hesitant to assign You or Carter that diagnosis. “Unless there was evidence that they were purposefully trying to manipulate someone to make them end their lives, [it’s not] necessarily psychopathy,” he explains. “It may be that [they] did not think through the consequences of their actions," he says, and didn't think to contact others to help their partners, who were suffering.

Wendy L. Patrick, PhD, a behavioral health specialist and career prosecutor based in San Diego, came to a similar thought in her Psychology Today article in response to Carter’s case. When reached for comment, she pointed to a 2016 study by Diane Felmlee and Robert Faris published in Social Psychology Quarterly. “They found online aggression to be more likely between individuals with close, intimate ties, as compared to individuals with more distant connections,” she tells Health.

She also notes that texting someone instead of talking to them can result in a decline in reflective thought and poor judgments, and can lead to “moral and cognitive ‘shallowness.” She pointed to research from 2017 on the “shallowing hypothesis” by Logan E. Annisette and Kathryn D. Lafreniere, PhD, which showed “that frequent texters were less likely to engage in reflective thought and viewed moral life goals as less important.”

Cyberbulling and psychopathy

It’s provocative to think that technology is at the root of all evil, and if cell phones didn't exist, the tragic results could have been avoided. However, when reached for comment, Lafreniere, one of the shallowing study’s authors and a professor of psychology at the University of Windsor, in Canada, wasn’t sure her study applied to Carter’s and You’s cases.

“Our study had more to do with an association between texting and social media use and more shallow values, like being image conscious and hedonistic. People who stage their lives to appear flawless, carefully curating their selfies and depictions of their life, etc.,” she tells Health. “[That] is considerably different than the very extreme forms of cyberbullying that seem to be involved in these cases.”

RELATED: 15 Myths and Facts About Suicide and Depression

While Lafreniere is not a clinical psychologist, she believes there is “some severe psychopathology underlying these cases that makes them different from the situations where people are guided by shallow values.”

So psychopathy comes into the forefront again. Mark Tunick, PhD, who teaches political theory, ethics, and law at the Wilkes Honors College of Florida Atlantic University in Boca Raton, Florida and wrote a book about Carter’s case, Texting, Suicide, and the Law: The Case Against Punishing Michelle Carter, has a different idea.

Why Carter acted the way she did “is complex and might not even be knowable,” he tells Health. But Tunick suspects that, early in the couple’s relationship, Carter “discouraged Conrad from attempting suicide and tried to lift his spirits, telling him that he was loved. She encouraged him to get treatment and suggested they even go to the same facility where she was to be treated for her own disorder.”

However, at some point, Tunick believes that Carter became frustrated with Roy. “[N]othing she said seemed to shake Conrad from his suicidal thoughts, and she came to think that he couldn’t go on living with such unbearable suffering,” Tunick says, noting that at one point Carter claimed the texts were a form of reverse psychology and her “goal was to have Conrad make an attempt that would be serious enough that he’d need to be hospitalized and get treatment, but not so serious that he’d succeed.”

Inside the young adult brain

It’s a comforting theory that perhaps a young person's callous texts were merely an extremely clumsy attempt at reverse psychologizing her boyfriend into getting help, but even Tunick recognizes the theory has limits.

Right before Roy died of carbon monoxide poisoning in his truck, he appeared to have second thoughts, leaving the truck and trying to save his life, and Carter vilely texted him to “get back in the truck” and that he would be “better off in heaven.” Something that only a psychopath would say to a suicidal boy, right? That, or something that would be said by a young adult with a still developing brain, psychological issues of their own (both You and Carter reportedly had their own battles), and the inability to, as Prinstein notes, “think through the consequences of their actions.”

While it is hard to imagine what would motivate a young adult to encourage a peer to take his or her own life, "the fact that it happens highlights the importance of being perceptive to signs of suicidal ideation in our young people—regardless of the cause," says Patrick.

If you or someone you know needs assistance, Text CONNECT to 741741, call the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 1-800-273-8255 or visit Speaking of Suicide.com for additional resources.

To get our top stories delivered to your inbox, sign up for the Healthy Living newsletter

Share Button

Measles deaths ‘staggering and tragic’

Global estimates suggest 142,000 people – mostly children – died from the disease in 2018

Share Button

Can Arctic ‘ice management’ combat climate change?

According to a much-debated geo-engineering approach, both sea-ice retreat and global warming could be slowed by using millions of wind-powered pumps, drifting in the sea ice, to promote ice formation during the Arctic winter. AWI researchers have now, for the first time, tested the concept using a complex climate model and published their findings in the journal Earth’s Future. Their verdict is sobering: though the approach could potentially put off ice-free Arctic summers for a few more decades, beyond the Arctic the massive campaign wouldn’t produce any meaningful cooling effect.

Though it sounds like science fiction, it’s a serious suggestion to combat climate change: ten million wind-powered pumps, distributed throughout the Arctic, are intended to promote the formation of sea ice in the winter. They would continually pump seawater onto the surface of the ice, where it would freeze. The now-thicker ice could then survive the summertime melting longer and therefore reflect sunlight longer where otherwise the darker ocean would readily take up the sun’s warming rays. This could not only slow the loss of Arctic sea ice, but also mitigate remote impacts, perhaps even the warming in lower latitudes. The idea, first proposed by US researchers as ‘Arctic ice management’ in the journal Earth’s Future in 2017, was recently put to the test in a coupled climate model by two experts from the Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research (AWI). What they found: from a purely physical standpoint, the near-total loss of summertime sea ice, which will likely come by mid-century in the ‘business-as-usual’ scenario, could indeed be pushed back to the end of the century. However, this grace period would not entail any significant cooling for the climate in Europe or around the globe.

“We wanted to know whether this manipulation of the Arctic sea ice could work in purely physical terms, and what effects it would have on the climate,” says Lorenzo Zampieri, an environmental physicist and doctoral candidate from the AWI’s sea-ice prediction research group. Accordingly, he modified the AWI climate model so that the physical effect produced — the constant pumping of water onto the sea ice’s surface throughout the winter — could be simulated. As Helge Goessling, head of the research group, explains: “Normally the growth of the ice is limited by the fact that, as it becomes thicker, the ice increasingly insulates the ocean from the winter cold; for this reason, typically you won’t find an overall thickness of more than a few metres. But the pumps do away with this limiting effect, because new layers are added to the ice from above.” Initial simulations based on pumps churning seawater onto the ice throughout the Arctic show: year after year, the ice would gain between one and two metres in thickness. According to the climate model, the global warming produced by CO2 wouldn’t put an end to this growth until the end of the century. And what about the effects on the climate? The summertime warming of the Arctic would in fact be lessened by several degrees Celsius, as projected in the original publication. However, pumping the comparatively warm (-1.8 °C) water would also alter the thermal flow in winter, resulting in a substantial warming of the Arctic in winter. This thermal energy would also be transported to the middle latitudes and stored in the ocean there.

In the next step, the researchers conducted more realistic simulations in which the pumps were only deployed where the ice was less than two metres thick. “Two-metre-thick ice already has the best chances of surviving the summertime melting, and by limiting the distribution of pumps in this way, the unnecessary and considerable wintertime warming can also be avoided,” says Lorenzo Zampieri. In this scenario, the undesirable additional warming of the middle latitudes could in fact be avoided, but the scheme would still do little to mitigate climate change. Though the warming of the Arctic in summer would be reduced by roughly one degree Celsius, and the loss of the sea ice could be delayed by roughly 60 years, the increased reflection of sunlight wouldn’t be sufficient to slow climate change outside the Arctic.

“Given the unchecked progression of climate change to date, geo-engineering can’t be dismissed as mere nonsense by the climate research community,” claims Helge Goessling. Instead, these ideas need to be subjected to scientific scrutiny. Arctic ‘ice management’, both authors agree, is interesting in its own right, but can’t meaningfully mitigate global climate change; as such, it should remain science fiction.

Share Button

How flowers adapt to their pollinators

Flowering plants are characterized by an astonishing diversity of flowers of different shapes and sizes. This diversity has arisen in adaptation to selection imposed by different pollinators including among others bees, flies, butterflies, hummingbirds, bats or rodents. Although several studies have documented that pollinators can impose strong selection pressures on flowers, our understanding of how flowers diversify remains fragmentary. For example, does the entire flower adapt to a pollinator, or do only some flower parts evolve to fit a pollinator while other flower parts may remain unchanged?

In a recent study, scientists around Agnes Dellinger from the Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research from the University of Vienna investigated flowers of 30 species of a tropical plant group (Merianieae) from the Andes. “Each of these plant species has adapted to pollination by either bees, birds, bats or rodents,” says Dellinger. Using High-Resolution X-ray computed tomography, the research team produced 3D-models of these flowers and used geometric-morphometric methods to analyse differences in flower shape among species with different pollinators.

The researchers could show that flower shapes have evolved in adaptation to the distinct pollinators, but that flower shape evolution was not homogeneous across the flower. In particular, the showy sterile organs of flowers (petals) adapted to the different pollinators more quickly than the rest of the flower: the reproductive organs have evolved more slowly. “This study is among the first to analyse the entire 3-dimensional flower shape, and it will be exciting to see whether similar evolutionary floral modularity exists in other plant groups,” concludes Dellinger.

make a difference: sponsored opportunity


Story Source:

Materials provided by University of Vienna. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Agnes S. Dellinger, Silvia Artuso, Susanne Pamperl, Fabián A. Michelangeli, Darin S. Penneys, Diana M. Fernández-Fernández, Marcela Alvear, Frank Almeda, W. Scott Armbruster, Yannick Staeder, Jürg Schönenberger. Modularity increases rate of floral evolution and adaptive success for functionally specialized pollination systems. Communications Biology, 2019; 2 (1) DOI: 10.1038/s42003-019-0697-7

Cite This Page:

University of Vienna. “How flowers adapt to their pollinators: Modularity facilitates rapid adaptation of single floral organs to different pollinators.” ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 5 December 2019. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/12/191205130558.htm>.

University of Vienna. (2019, December 5). How flowers adapt to their pollinators: Modularity facilitates rapid adaptation of single floral organs to different pollinators. ScienceDaily. Retrieved December 5, 2019 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/12/191205130558.htm

University of Vienna. “How flowers adapt to their pollinators: Modularity facilitates rapid adaptation of single floral organs to different pollinators.” ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/12/191205130558.htm (accessed December 5, 2019).

Share Button

Damaging rains from hurricanes more intense after winds begin to subside

Howling wind drives torrential rain sideways as tall, slender palms bow and tree limbs snap. A hurricane approaches, its gale-force winds wreaking havoc as it nears the coast. Storm surges combine with the downpour, inundating the area with water.

But according to new research out of UC Santa Barbara, the rains that come once the storm has weakened may actually be more intense than when the storm is at its strongest.

“The highest intensities of rainfall occur after the hurricanes have weakened to tropical storms, not when they first make landfall as major hurricanes,” said lead author Danielle Touma, a postdoctoral scholar at the university’s Bren School of Environmental Science & Management. The study appears in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

The finding has counterintuitive implications. “If we’re thinking about risks, we know that major hurricanes can drive storm surges, there’s strong winds and so on. But this paper is also saying hurricanes are still dangerous even after they’ve weakened to tropical storms,” said coauthor Samantha Stevenson, an assistant professor at Bren.

Around the time Hurricane Harvey hit Houston in 2017, Touma was developing a new method for studying areas and intensities of rainfall around tropical cyclones — which include hurricanes and tropical storms — based on weather station data. Many previous studies have used satellite and radar data, but these records are limited to the late 20th and early 21st centuries. In contrast, records from weather stations begin in 1900. Using the measurements from the stations, Touma could calculate the extent of land that experienced rain from a given weather system, as well as how much rain fell.

These issues were in sharp focus during the 2017 hurricane season, especially as flooding in Southern Texas racked up roughly $130 billion in damages, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Analyzing decades of records, Touma discovered that the accompanying rainfall tended to be more severe after a hurricane had abated to the category of a tropical storm. In that sense, the cyclones were more dangerous after they had subsided, in spite of their slower wind speeds.

“You might think hurricanes are most dangerous when they’re strongest, because that’s when the winds are whipping around the fastest,” Stevenson said, “but this paper actually finds that the risk due to extreme rainfall is largest after the hurricane has weakened a bit.”

Tropical cyclones tend to slow down once they hit land because they are cut off from their energy source, the ocean. There’s no longer warm water evaporating below them to drive the convection that fuels the system. As a result, the cyclone becomes disorganized and spins at lower speeds, causing it to spread out. “Now it’s kind of parked in one spot, and it can just dump a lot of rain on a particular location,” Stevenson explained.

Naturally, this effect is most pronounced for cyclones that started as major hurricanes. A smaller cyclone would follow the same pattern — hit land, slow down and spread out — but it wouldn’t contain the sheer volume of water to cause the same degree of damage.

Scientists predict that the intensity of tropical cyclone rainfall will increase as global temperatures rise. In fact, the team has already begun to see this trend in their historical data.

“Since our analysis used longer records than previous studies, we were better able to detect long-term trends,” Stevenson explained. “What this paper adds to the conversation is which types of storms we have to pay more attention to in disaster preparedness plans.”

Story Source:

Materials provided by University of California – Santa Barbara. Original written by Harrison Tasoff. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Share Button