A little formula in first days of life may not impact breastfeeding at 6 months

A study has lodged a new kink in the breastfeeding dilemma that adds to the angst of exhausted new parents: While most newborns lose weight in the first days of life, do you or don’t you offer a little formula after breastfeeding if the weight loss is more than usual?

For years, the answer has been “no,” as infant formula was seen as a deterrent to breastfeeding. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends exclusive breastfeeding until 6 months of age, and continuing breastfeeding until 12 months while transitioning to solids. But according to the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention, just over one-third of infants in the United States are breastfeeding at 12 months.

The answer is no longer clear-cut, say researchers of the UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospitals — led study, publishing in JAMA Pediatrics on June 3, 2019. It depends on breastfeeding duration goals and attitudes, and needs to be balanced against the risks that newborns face in the first days of life when their weight is dropping.

In the study, the researchers tracked the long-term feeding habits of 164 babies born at UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospitals and Penn State Children’s Hospital. The infants had been breastfed between 1-to-3 days old, and their weight loss had been in the 75th percentile or above for age. Half of the mothers added syringe-fed formula after each breastfeeding, which stopped when the mother’s milk came in at two-to-five days after delivery. The other half had continued to breastfeed exclusively.

Marital Status, Breastfeeding Goals Are Factors in Weaning

The researchers found that at 6 months of age, the infants in the supplemented group were as likely to breastfeed as those who had exclusively breastfed. But by 12 months of age, that had changed. In the supplemented group, 21 of the 12-month-olds (30 percent) were still breastfeeding, versus 37 of the infants (48 percent) in the non-supplemented group. The disparity between the two groups was less marked when the researchers accounted for married status and longer breastfeeding duration goals, both of which are associated with longer-term breastfeeding.

“The results suggest that using early, limited formula may not have a negative impact on infants, but it may alter maternal attitudes toward breastfeeding,” said first author Valerie Flaherman, MD, a pediatrician at UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospitals and associate professor in the UCSF departments of pediatrics, and epidemiology and biostatistics.

While limited formula in the first days of life did not seem to change feeding habits among newborns that were exclusively breastfed, “it’s possible that supplementation reduced commitment, by the mother or other family members, to avoid it later in infancy,” she said.

An earlier study of the same 164 infants, also led by Flaherman, found that the supplemented newborns may have been at lower risk for hyperbilirubinemia, a condition that leads to jaundice and may be caused by inadequate nutrition. Of the five infants readmitted to the hospital by 1 month of age, four were in the non-supplemented group.

“Our study’s results show that early, limited formula may have significant benefits as well as risks for subsequent breastfeeding duration,” said Flaherman.

“Counseling that implies all formula is harmful would be inaccurate and may be detrimental to long-term breastfeeding success,” she said. However, if formula is used in the first few days after birth to prevent hyperbilirubinemia or dehydration, “it should be discontinued as soon as possible, since ongoing use at 1 week of age indicates a mother is at high risk of early breastfeeding cessation.”

Senior author Ian M. Paul, MD, of Penn State College of Medicine, emphasized that a “rigid, one-size-fits-all approach” was inappropriate. “Guidelines for care and standards set by hospital accreditation agencies should consider these data and how best to support babies and their mothers,” he said.

Share Button

Climate action urgently required to protect human health in Europe

EASAC is the voice of independent science advice, mobilising Europe’s leading scientists from 27 national science academies to guide EU policy for the benefit of society. By considering a large body of independent studies on the effects of climate change on health, and on strategies to address the risks to health, EASAC has identified key messages and drawn important new conclusions. The evidence shows that climate change is adversely affecting human health and that health risks are projected to increase. Solutions are within reach and much can be done by acting on present knowledge, but this requires political will. With current trends in greenhouse gas emissions, a global average temperature increase of over 3°C above pre-industrial levels is projected by the end of the century. The increase will be higher over land than the oceans, exposing the world population to unprecedented rates of climate change and contributing to the burden of disease and premature mortality. Health risks will increase as climate change intensifies through a range of pathways including:

  • Increased exposure to high temperatures and extreme events such as floods and droughts, air pollution and allergens;
  • Weakening of food and nutrition security;
  • Increased incidence and changing distribution of some infectious diseases (including mosquito-borne, food-borne and water-borne diseases);
  • Growing risk of forced migration.

EASAC emphasises that the top priority is to stabilise climate and accelerate efforts to limit greenhouse gas emissions. The economic benefits of action to address the current and prospective health effects of climate change are likely to be substantial.

Working Group co-chair, Professor Sir Andy Haines (London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine), comments, “If urgent action is not taken to reduce emissions in order to keep temperatures below the 2°C (or less) limit enshrined in the Paris Climate Agreement, we face potentially irreversible changes that will have wide ranging impacts on many aspects of health. The scientific community has an important role in generating knowledge and countering misinformation. We hope that this comprehensive report will act as a wake-up call and draw attention to the need for action, particularly by pursuing policies to decarbonise the economy. The protection of health must have a higher profile in policies aimed at mitigating or adapting to the effects of climate change.” Key messages addressed in the report include:

  • Several hundred thousand premature deaths annually in the EU could be averted by a ‘zero-carbon’ economy through reduced air pollution

    Pollution endangers planetary health, damages ecosystems and is intimately linked to global climate change. Fine particulate and ozone air pollution arise from many of the same sources as emissions of greenhouse gases and short-lived climate pollutants. For the EU overall, fossil-fuel-related emissions account for more than half of the excess mortality attributed to ambient (outdoor) air pollution. A recent estimate suggests that about 350,000 excess deaths annually in the EU can be attributed to ambient air pollution from burning fossil fuels and a total of about 500,000 from all human-related activities.

    Understanding of the range of health effects of air pollution on the health of children and adults is growing. Seven million babies in Europe are living in areas where air pollution exceeds WHO recommended limits and such exposure may affect brain development and cognitive function. Action to reduce pollution through decarbonisation of the economy must be viewed as a priority to address both climate change and public health imperatives.

  • Promotion of healthier, more sustainable diets with increased consumption of fruit, vegetables and legumes and reduced red meat intake will lower the burden of non-communicable diseases and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

    Promoting dietary change could have major health and environmental benefits, resulting in significant reductions of up to about 40% in greenhouse gas emissions from food systems as well as reducing water and land use demands. Such diets can also lead to major reductions on non-communicable disease burden through reduced risk of heart disease, stroke and other conditions.

    If food and nutrition security declines because of climate change, the EU can probably still satisfy its requirements by importing food. But this will have increasing consequences for the rest of the world; for example, by importing fodder for livestock from arable land that has been created through deforestation. It is therefore vital to develop climate-smart food systems to ensure more resilient agricultural production and to promote food and nutrition security, for the benefit of human health.

  • Climate action could avert a significant increase in the spread of infectious diseases

    The spread of infectious diseases in Europe could increase through climate change. These diseases include those that are spread by vectors (particularly mosquitos) and food- and water-borne infections. There is also an increased risk to animal health across Europe from conditions such as Blue tongue virus.

    Distribution of the mosquito species Aedes albopictus, known to be a vector for diseases such as dengue, is already expanding in Europe and may extend to much of Western Europe within the next decade.

    Water-borne infections such as diarrhea may increase following heavy rainfall and flooding and higher temperatures may be associated with increased antibiotic resistance for pathogens such as E. coli. In the case of Salmonella species, an increase in temperature will increase multiplication and spread in food and increase the risks of food poisoning. There could also be an increase in Norovirus infections related to heavy rainfall and flooding. Strengthening communicable disease surveillance and response systems should be a priority for improving adaptation to climate change.

  • Providing evidence of the health benefits of action on climate change may be instrumental in achieving rapid reductions in greenhouse gas emissions

    Although the EU is actively engaged in efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to identify suitable adaptation measures, the impacts of climate change on health have been relatively neglected in EU policy. Recognising the serious challenges that climate change poses to the global health gains made in recent decades is key to promoting public engagement.

    Furthermore, the impact of climate change in other regions can have tangible consequences in Europe and the EU has responsibilities in addressing problems outside its area.

    The EU must do more to ensure that health impact assessment is part of all proposed initiatives, and that climate and health policy is integrated with other policy priorities including coordinating strategies at EU and national level. It is also vital that the steps are taken to counter misinformation about the causes and consequences of climate change which threaten to undermine the political will to act.

Story Source:

Materials provided by European Academies’ Science Advisory Council, Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Cite This Page:

European Academies’ Science Advisory Council, Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften. “Climate action urgently required to protect human health in Europe.” ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 3 June 2019. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/06/190603160816.htm>.

European Academies’ Science Advisory Council, Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften. (2019, June 3). Climate action urgently required to protect human health in Europe. ScienceDaily. Retrieved June 3, 2019 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/06/190603160816.htm

European Academies’ Science Advisory Council, Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften. “Climate action urgently required to protect human health in Europe.” ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/06/190603160816.htm (accessed June 3, 2019).

Share Button

Health24.com | Can your vagina be too tight for sex?

It’s a logical conclusion: If it hurts when a partner tries to put their penis or a toy inside of you, or if they can’t get all the way inside, then it must be a problem of tightness, right? Ehhh, not exactly.

There are several reasons for why you might feel like you’re too tight for vaginal penetration, and it’s actually a pretty common problem that gynaecologists hear about. But it’s a misconception that feeling a sensation of tightness means you actually have less elasticity down there—and thinking this may prevent you from finding a real (and, in many cases, easy!) solution.

The truth is, vaginas are ridiculously stretchy, says ob-gyn Dr Susan Khalil, director of sexual health for the Mount Sinai Health System. Think about it: Lots of people push babies out of that tiny hole, so it’s gotta give.

So if it’s not a problem of stretch, what’s the issue? Well, there are a variety of factors that might be at play. For instance, “Certain medical conditions can mimic the feeling of tightness,” Dr. Khalil says.

Here are a few common reasons why it may feel as if your vagina is too tight for sex, plus how to find relief.

You went through a hormonal shift.

During menopause, your body experiences a drop in estrogen, which can lead to dryness and the thinning of vaginal tissues, the Mayo Clinic explains. As a result, you may feel a sensation of tightness or irritation during sex. This is something you should bring up with your doctor, who can recommend an over-the-counter vaginal lubricant, or possibly a prescription estrogen cream or hormone replacement therapy.

For some people, menopause messes with more than just lubrication. Sometimes a postmenopausal vagina also atrophies a little bit, Dr. Khalil says, meaning it literally gets more narrow. “And if they don’t have intercourse at all, it can become very uncomfortable,” she says.

Her recommendation? Masturbation. This way, you’re in total control and can gradually help stretch your vagina and make penetration feel more comfortable for you. If a larger toy is uncomfortable at first, you can practice with a series of vaginal dilators that will help your vagina stretch slowly over time.

Birth control, too, can sometimes cause a bit of hormonal upheaval for some people and cause dryness (and, in turn, painful sex). If you just switched your BC and noticed feeling dry or “tight,” or if you have this issue at a particular time during the month, talk to your doctor about it so they can help you determine whether your birth control might be to blame.

You recently had a baby.

Pregnancy and childbirth also involve hormonal changes that can lead to vaginal dryness and issues with painful sex. This is especially the case if you are breastfeeding, according to the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists (ACOG).

Or, if you’re seriously convinced your vagina is tighter after childbirth, it may not be in your head. Though this isn’t super common, Dr. Khalil says that some women who tear during childbirth get stitched up too tightly—meaning that in this one case, their vagina truly is too tight for sex. “Sometimes sutures are done too tightly [and] they’ll need a surgical procedure to fix it,” Dr. Khalil notes.

The same thing can happen if you’ve had a surgery in your genital area (with or without a baby involved), Dr. Khalil notes. But once your doctor goes back in and loosens the stitch, you should be good to go.

Your vagina is too dry.

There’s a laundry list of reasons for why your vagina may be producing less natural lubrication than it usually does: Maybe you’re going through menopause, you’re breastfeeding, your vagina is naturally dry, or you’re on medication (yup, like birth control) that messes with your lubrication.

Regardless of the reason, though, not having enough lubrication can make sex feel more painful and might make you think your vagina seems tighter, Dr. Khalil says. “I’ll have patients come in and they’ll say it really hurts to have sex,” she says.

Luckily, the immediate solution is pretty easy most of the time: Use a lubricant. Tbh, lubricant makes sex feel better for most people, but it’s especially helpful for people who are dealing with vaginal dryness. Keep in mind, using lube doesn’t actually fix the underlying issue at hand (say, finding a birth control that vibes better with your body), so you should still *always* bring it up with your doc if dryness is a problem for you.

You have vaginismus.

Some people have a condition called vaginismus, which is when the muscles inside their vagina contract involuntarily. The muscle contraction makes it painful anytime something is inserted into the vagina; sometimes even tampon insertion is too much, according to the Merck Manuals.

Most of the time, someone who has vaginismus has it from the very first time they attempt to have penetrative sex. But in other cases it can develop later in life. For some, the cause behind vaginismus may be psychological or a result of an emotional trauma, the Merck Manual says.

While it may take some time to treat vaginismus, working with a pelvic floor physical therapist or gradually using larger and larger vaginal dilators can help, Dr. Khalil says. Working with a mental health professional may also help some individuals.

No matter what, Dr. Khalil encourages talking openly about any vaginal discomfort that you’re unsure about.

Whether you feel “tight” or something else, know that you deserve to feel pain-free down below during sex and everything else in life. So be your own health advocate and speak up—to both your partner(s) and your gynaecologist.

“Your annual exam is more than a Pap smear,” Dr. Khalil says. “It’s also an opportunity to get to the bottom of any sexual health concerns.”

This article was originally published on www.womenshealthsa.co.za

Image credit: iStock

NEXT ON HEALTH24X

Share Button

Health24.com | The best way to calculate your keto diet macros

All you really need to now about the keto diet is fat equals good, carbs equals bad… right?

If only. While, yes, the keto diet focuses on keeping your daily carb intake low and boosting the good fats in your diet, it can get a little more complicated than that—especially if you’re following the keto diet to a T and, you know, actually counting your keto macros—a.k.a. how many grams of carbs, fats, and protein you get each day.

TBH, counting your macros is hard regardless of the eating plan (math, amiright??), but it gets even more complicated when your entire diet depends on it (too many carbs and not enough fat means no ketosis—and less weight loss).

Here’s how to break down your keto macros, so you have the best chance of seeing those sweet, sweet keto diet results.

So what do macros on the keto diet look like?

Real talk: Hard numbers or percentages on the keto diet are tricky because there are so many differing opinions about the “right way” to do keto, and little research to back up the varying methods, says J. Wesley McWhorter, a registered dietitian at UTHealth School of Public Health in Houston. “Keto diets have morphed into a variety of macro levels with ranges of up to 20 percent carbohydrates, 10 to 30 percent protein, and 50 to 90 percent fat.”

READ MORE: “I Did The Vegan Keto Diet And This Is What Happened”

Okay, but how does that break down in grams of protein, fat, and carbs?

There’s a simple equation to help you figure out how many grams of carbs you should be eating on, say, a 1,600-calorie-a-day keto diet, but first you need to know that:

  • Carbs have four calories per gram.
  • Fat has nine calories per gram
  • Protein has four calories per gram.

Let’s also say you’re aiming for a standard keto diet of 10 percent carbs—”which is low enough for most people to get into nutritional ketosis,” says Amanda Maucere, a registered dietitian nutritionist at Lung Health Institute in Tampa, Florida—20 percent protein, and 70 percent fat.

Just use these simple equations to figure out how many grams of carbs, protein, and fat you should be aiming for:

  • Carbs: Calories per day (1,600) x percentage of calories from carbs (.10) / Number of calories per gram in carbohydrates (4) = 40 grams of carbs per day
  • Protein: Calories per day (1,600) x percentage of calories from protein (.20) / Number of calories per gram in protein (4) = 80 grams of protein per day
  • Fat: Calories per day (1,600) x percentage of calories from carbs (.70) / Number of calories per gram in fat (9) = 125 grams of fat per day

Tracking your carbs is likely the most important part of the keto diet—but you can have a little more flexibility when it comes to your protein and fat macros.

When it comes to your protein intake, in general, it’s a good rule to eat about half of your ideal body weight, says Maucere. “For example, if you feel your best at 68 kilos, you’d want to eat around 75 grams of protein a day,” she says (which, tbh, is very close to the 80 grams of protein you’d get from the equation above).

The rest of your diet should consist mainly of fats, but even that varies based on your energy needs, says Maucere. “I typically tell my patients to eat enough fat to feel satiated between meals,” she adds. For some, that might mean far less than the 125 grams of fat per day calculated above.

READ MORE: 10 Keto-Friendly Vegetables That Are Incredibly Low-Carb

That’s… a lot of math. Is there an easier way to keep track of this?

I get it; tallying all those grams and percentages can get a bit daunting (no one said there’d be math on this portion of the test!). You can try apps like Cron-o-meter (Maucere’s favourite), old school notebooks, etc. But remember: “The best method of tracking macros is always going to be the one you can commit to and stick to on a regular basis,” says Jen Oikarinen, a registered dietician and clinical dietitian at Banner University Medical Center in Phoenix.

If counting is really not your jam, you can also just eyeball your macros: “A typical keto plate would have a palm-sized portion of meat, one or two fistfuls of vegetables, and as much fat as you need to achieve satiety,” says Maucere. To figure out what satiety looks like for you, she suggests going with one or two thumb-sized portions of fat to start and building from there. “So, a meal may look like a small piece of steak with a good-sized portion of green beans and chopped walnuts.”

Of course, even more important than counting your keto macros, McWhorter says, is paying attention to the quality of food you put in your body. “Even if you hit your ‘macro goals,’ but you are not including fruits, vegetables, legumes, nuts, seeds, and whole grains, you could be in trouble.” Remember that all of these food groups are full of fibre and beneficial in fighting diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and promoting satiety and weight control.

This article was originally published on www.womenshealthsa.co.za

Image credit: iStock

NEXT ON HEALTH24X

Share Button

Baby gene experiment ‘foolish and dangerous’

Twin girls had their DNA altered to protect against HIV – but their mutation may increase the risk of an early death.

Share Button

Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital chief Simon Wright to leave

Simon Wright, of The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital trust, says the decision was not easy.

Share Button

Health24.com | Vaping habit might make you more prone to flu

Steering clear of people who are coughing and sneezing is one way to prevent catching the flu. Avoiding e-cigarettes may be another, new research suggests.

In a small study including smokers, e-cigarette users and non-smokers, researchers saw that both traditional cigarette smokers and “vapers” were more susceptible to flu.

Women have greater risk

But cigarettes and e-cigarettes appeared to boost flu risk through different pathways.

“E-cigarettes can alter your response to viral infections and may make you more susceptible to influenza,” said the study’s lead author, Meghan Rebuli. She’s a postdoctoral research associate at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’s Center for Environmental Medicine, Asthma and Lung Biology.

Rebuli added that the researchers found that men and women responded differently to e-cigarettes, and women may have an even greater risk of infection with flu if they vape.

E-cigarettes are small electronic devices that heat a liquid to make an aerosol to be inhaled or “vaped”. The liquid may contain nicotine, flavouring and other chemicals, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Because e-cigarettes contain fewer chemicals than tobacco cigarettes, they’re generally considered somewhat safer. E-cigarettes can be beneficial if they help people stop smoking tobacco cigarettes, the CDC says. But people who haven’t smoked shouldn’t start using e-cigarettes, they advise.

Disrupting immune response

More research needs to be done on any potential health effects from e-cigarettes, the CDC noted.

And that’s where this study comes in.

“We know that cigarette smoking increases your risk of infection with influenza, and we were curious whether e-cigarettes would also disrupt the normal immune response,” Rebuli said.

The study included nearly 50 people – 14 e-cigarette users, 13 tobacco cigarette smokers and 20 non-smokers. On average, participants were slightly overweight and in their mid to late 20s. But the e-cigarette vapers were slightly younger, with an average age of 23.

Rebuli noted that many of the e-cigarette users were former tobacco smokers, but they had to have been off of tobacco cigarettes for at least a year to be in the study. E-cigarette users had to have vaped for at least 30 days, though most had been doing so for a few years, according to Rebuli.

The researchers also required that e-cigarette users in the study had to puff on an e-cigarette at least 18 times daily. Many did more than that, with some puffing several hundred times a day, Rebuli said.

E-cigarettes do affect immune system

All of the volunteers were exposed to a “live attenuated influenza virus”. Rebuli said this particular virus only replicates in the nose.

When the investigators looked at how the immune system responded to the virus, they saw differences in e-cigarette and regular cigarette smokers compared to the non-smokers. But the changes differed depending on the method of smoking.

Rebuli said it’s not clear exactly how e-cigarettes led to the changes in the immune response, just that they did. And while the researchers didn’t look at whether or not a flu infection might be more severe in people who use e-cigarettes, “it’s a possibility,” she said.

Dr Richard Stumacher is chief of pulmonary and critical care medicine at Northern Westchester Hospital in Mount Kisco, New York. He said this study is an important step in better understanding the effects of e-cigarette research.

“What’s important to glean from this preliminary information is that there is evidence that e-cigarettes do affect the immune system in a way that’s directly related to a person’s ability to fight an infection,” Stumacher said.

Findings from the study are scheduled to be presented at the American Thoracic Society meeting in Dallas. Findings presented at meetings should be viewed as preliminary until they’ve been published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Image credit: iStock

Share Button

NHS turns to Mumsnet to fill nurse vacancies

Partnership with online parenting chatroom is part of a package of measures to recruit 40,000 more nurses.

Share Button

Health24.com | What to buy when ready-made meals are your only option

We all have days when we arrive at home late and feel too tired to prepare a meal. While ready-made food seems like the answer, we don’t always know how healthy these pre-prepared dishes are. 

We went shopping and evaluated the options on the shelves. For the purpose of this research and analysis we focused on meals found at Spar, Pick n Pay, Woolworths and Checkers. We focused on food options that can be considered a meal by offering a combination of protein, healthy fats, vegetables and wholegrains.   

Why our choices may not be as healthy as they seem

The key to deciding on a ready-made meal basically comes down to reading labels. Options that look healthy often prove to be quite the opposite. Some Indian style meals for example have double the energy value you would normally aim for.

Quiche portions turned out to be high in energy, carbohydrates and sugars. Some grain salads that seem suitable as ready-made meals were, however, high in energy and fat. And the sachets of dressing included with ready-made salads often alter the nutritional value of a seemingly healthy salad because of high sugar content. 

How do I read a label?

Look at the section on a food label where it gives nutritional information per serving size. This is useful because some ready-made food packages contain only one serving, while others contain two to six servings.

Energy: preferably ±1000–1300kJ (aim for a maximum of 1600kJ)

  • Protein: ±14–35g
  • Carbohydrates: ±15g (max 30g)
  • Of which is sugar: ±<5–10g
  • Total fat: <10–15g per 100g
  • Saturated fat: <10g fat per 100g
  • Fibre: >6g per 100g
  • Total cholesterol per meal: <80mg
  • Sodium: <900mg

Other helpful tips for label reading:

Ingredients are listed in order of weight, with the largest quantity first. Keep an eye out for red flag items such as fats, salt and sugar in all their different forms. They are normally listed by their scientific names:

  • Sugar: cane sugar, honey, maltose, maltodextrin, glucose, corn syrup, fructose, dextrose, sucrose or high fructose corn syrup 
  • Fats: vegetable fats, hydrogenated fats, lard, shortening, coconut oil or palm kernel oil
  • Salt: sodium, a word which may appear in combination with other terms (e.g. monosodium glutamate or MSG)

You can also seek out key terms or icons on the packaging suggesting that it may be a healthier option:

  • Low GI (glycaemic index), Low GI icon or Diabetes SA icon (This gives an idea on the balance of carbohydrates, sugar, protein and fibre in the food, allowing slow and steady release of glucose)
  • Heart and Stroke Foundation icon (the red and white heart)
  • Managed fat, fibre and salt contents to promote good cardiovascular health
  • Reduced calories/energy (Be careful of a potentially high sugar content in these products.)
  • High fibre content
  • Low sugar
  • Low salt

So, what’s on our shopping list?* 

 The top runners we found were the following:

Soups:

  • Pick n Pay soups: Spicy Red Thai; Beetroot; Broccoli and Kale; Moroccan Lamb (R16.50–R27.50/serving)
  • Spar Tomato Soup (R18.99/serving)
  • Checkers soups: Veg; Veg and Split Pea; Sweetcorn Chowder; Beef and Barley (R12.5–R15.5/serving)

Meals:

  • Checkers Asian Bowl (R35.99)
  • Checkers Mediterranean Salad (R32.99)
  • Woolworths Low Fat & KJ Controlled™ Beef & Pumpkin Mash 320g (R73.99)
  • Woolworths Low Fat & KJ Controlled™ Teriyaki Chicken 300g (R73.99)
  • Woolworths Carb Clever™ Sun-Dried Tomato Chicken with Pesto 320g (R75.99)
  • Woolworths Carb Clever™ Beef Chilli 330g (R75.99)
  • Woolworths Carb Clever™ Beef Bolognese 340g (R75.99)
  • Woolworths Cottage Pie 235g (R46.99)
  • Woolworths Roast Veg Couscous Salad (R46.99)
  • Woolworths Chicken Biryani (R38.50)

Not wanting to be caught unawares, while staying within your budget? Our tips and go-to shopping list for eating health on a budget may help you. 

*Prices correct at the time of publishing, but could change at any time. 

Image credit: iStock

NEXT ON HEALTH24X

Share Button

Health24.com | Can a sore throat really be deadly?

A 13-year-old girl from Kentucky made the headlines earlier this year when she died suddenly during a school cheerleading competition. A coroner’s report later revealed that Lilliana Schaik died from a strep infection. According to reports, Schaik fell ill during a school ballet competition. After her hand went numb and she experienced pain in her pelvis, her father rushed her to the emergency room, but her condition quickly deteriorated…

Strep throat: viral or bacterial?

Sore throats can be caused by both viruses and bacteria, but the most common cause of a sore throat (pharyngitis) is a viral infection.

The common cold is a viral infection that usually resolves on its own. Strep throat (streptococcal infection), on the other hand, is a bacterial infection and usually requires antibiotic treatment.

In Schalck’s case, bacteria called Group A beta-haemolytic Streptococcus (GAS) are what led to her death. Her father told WLWT5 that she was healthy and had caught a cold about a week before the competition, which she had seemingly fought off. He added that the strep infection “overwhelmed her immune system with little or no warning, with catastrophic results”.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention notes that GAS can cause various infections ranging from minor illnesses, such as strep throat, to more deadly diseases like pneumonia and meningitis. If your immune system is strong, your body will fight back and you’ll recover after about a week. For the situation to result in serious complications or death, GAS would need to be very invasive, and even in such cases, around 90% of people recover with medical help. 

Oral antibiotics are effective for treating mild GAS infections, but more serious cases require multiple IV antibiotics, and even surgery to remove dead and dying tissue.     

In another 2017 case, a Michigan man needed a quadruple amputation after a near-death encounter due to strep-throat that had progressed. An 11-year-old Mississauga girl suffered the same fate after doctors had diagnosed her condition as flu.

According to MedicineNet, GAS is usually spread by direct human-to-human contact. Touching items recently handled by an infected individual also makes one susceptible to infection. While research into GAS is ongoing, there is as yet no commercially available vaccine to prevent infection. However, good hygiene helps to protect one against the disease, and early treatment of GAS infections can reduce or prevent progression to a more severe condition.

Image: iStock

Share Button