Cereals use chemical defenses in a multifunctional manner against different herbivores

A team of scientists from the University of Bern (Switzerland) and the Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology and their partners have characterized multiple functions of benzoxazinoids in wheat: The toxic form of the substances makes the plant directly resistant to lepidopteran larvae, whereas a less toxic form regulates indirect defense mechanisms against aphids. Scientists have identified the “switch” between these different functions as a methyltransferase enzyme, which is activated by caterpillar feeding. This switch enables wheat plants to adapt their defense response to different herbivores. A comparison with maize shows that a methyltransferase also regulates defense processes in maize against different pest insects. However, the two enzymes in wheat and maize have evolved independently from each other (Science Advances, December 5, 2018).

In nature, plants are exposed to a multitude of enemies that feed on their leaves, stems and roots, or feast on their sap. In response to these threats, plants have evolved the capacity to produce secondary metabolites whose functions include preventing herbivores from feeding. Plants can use such defensive substances in a multifunctional manner. A team of researchers led by Tobias Köllner from the Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology and Matthias Erb from the University of Bern has now characterized the function of benzoxazinoids in wheat. The researchers used previously obtained, detailed knowledge about the defensive functions of benzoxazinoids in maize. In maize plants, the enzyme methyltransferase acts as a functional switch: it decides whether benzoxazinoids act as efficient toxins to protect the plant from caterpillar herbivory, or whether benzoxazinoids are less toxic, but induce callose production. Callose is used as a cell sealant that blocks sieve elements and makes it difficult for the aphids to suck phloem sap. “Our approach was to introduce the maize switch into wheat and to permanently activate it. Together with our colleagues from the Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, we made transgenic wheat plants which were no longer able to choose between toxin production and defense regulation, but constantly produced the toxic form of the benzoxazinoids. This enabled us to elucidate the functions of benzoxazinoids in wheat in detail,” explains Tobias Köllner.

The approach allowed for a thorough analysis of how switching between toxin production and defense regulation affects wheat resistance to lepidopteran larvae and aphids. Moreover, the scientists were able to identify the corresponding switch in wheat and to analyze it from a biochemical and phylogenetic perspective. Although maize and wheat both produce benzoxazinoids — their most important defense, via the same, conserved core biosynthetic pathway — in both species, the genes responsible for switching between their toxic and regulative forms are only distantly related. Thus, the two cereal species likely evolved this switch independently during the course of evolution. Scientists call this phenomenon “convergent evolution.”

“Convergent evolution is widespread in nature and results from the fact that different species evolve a solution for the same problem independently from each other. It is remarkable that two grasses which produce the same specialized defensive substances evolved the corresponding switch for their use independently of each other. On one hand, this may be evidence that the ability to use benzoxazinoids for different functions has evolved relatively recently. On the other hand, it highlights the importance of the ability to adapt defense responses specifically to different herbivores. In our opinion, what we are observing here is the emergence of new regulative mechanisms away from the conserved canon of phytohormones towards more specialized systems,” says Matthias Erb. “Interestingly, plants of the cabbage family also use defensive substances for callose regulation, suggesting that this type of multifunctionality is widespread in the plant kingdom.”

As a next step, the researchers would like to find out how benzoxazinoids control other defensive processes. They are particularly interested in finding an answer to whether there are receptors for benzoxazinoids. If so, these could well be classified as specialized hormones, thus further blurring the boundary between plant toxins and defense regulators. Ultimately, this research could contribute to answering why plants use toxins to regulate defenses in addition to classical plant hormones.

Story Source:

Materials provided by Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Share Button

A detailed look at the microorganisms that colonize, and degrade, a 400-year-old painting

What’s a feast for the human eye may be a literal feast for microorganisms that colonize works of art, according to a new study in the open-access journal PLOS ONE by Elisabetta Caselli of the University of Ferrara, Italy, and colleagues. The researchers characterized the microbial community on a 17th century painting and showed that while some microbes destroy such works of art, others might be employed to protect them.

The wide variety of organic and inorganic materials that comprise a painting, such as canvas, oil, pigments, and varnish, can provide an ideal environment for colonizing bacteria and fungi, increasing the risk for biodegradation. To characterize the microorganisms on one such painting, “Incoronazione della Virgine” by Carlo Bononi, completed in 1620, the authors removed a 4 mm2 section of the painted surface adjacent to a damaged area.

Using a combination of microscopy and microbial culture techniques, the authors identified a variety of microbes which had colonized the painting. They isolated multiple strains of Staphylococcus and Bacillus bacteria as well as filamentous fungi of the Aspergillus, Penicillium, Cladosporium, and Alternaria genera. The authors note that some of the 17th century paint pigments used, notably red lac and red and yellow earths, may be nutrient sources for the microbes. They also tested a decontaminating biocompound which contained spores of three Bacillus bacteria and found that these could inhibit growth of both the bacteria and the fungi isolated from the painting.

The authors conclude that a wide range of bacterial and fungal species may inhabit such ancient paintings, but biocompounds potentially represent a novel approach for preserving works of art at risk of biodegradation.

The authors add: “Clarification of biotederioration processes in artworks is important, as it could help in preventing or solving the associated damages. This study investigated such aspects in a 17th century painting, by analyzing both microbial communities and chemical composition of painting, also evaluating a possible biological way to counteract these phenomena.”

Story Source:

Materials provided by PLOS. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Share Button

Memory B cells in the lung may be important for more effective influenza vaccinations

Seasonal influenza vaccines are typically less than 50 percent effective, according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention studies. Research at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, published this week in Nature Immunology, may point a path to more effective vaccines.

Researchers led by Troy Randall, Ph.D., professor in the UAB Department of Medicine’s Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, studied a type of immune cell in the lung called a resident memory B cell. Up to now, it had not been clear if these cells might be useful to combat influenza infections or even if they existed at all.

Using a mouse model of influenza and experiments that included parabiosis — the linking of the blood circulatory systems between two mice — Randall and colleagues definitively showed that lung-resident memory B cells establish themselves in the lung soon after influenza infection. Those lung-resident memory B cells responded more quickly to produce antibodies against influenza after a second infection, as compared to the response by the circulating memory B cells in lymphoid tissue. The UAB researchers also found that establishment of the lung-resident memory B cells required a local antigen encounter in the lung.

“These data demonstrate that lung-resident memory B cells are an important component of immunity to respiratory viruses like influenza,” Randall said. “They also suggest that vaccines designed to elicit highly effective, long-lived protection against influenza virus infection will need to deliver antigens to the respiratory tract.”

B cells, or B lymphocytes, are a class of white blood cells that can develop into antibody-secreting plasma cells or into dormant memory B cells. Specific antibodies produced by the infection-fighting plasma cells help neutralize or destroy viral or bacterial pathogens. Memory B cells “remember” a previous infection and are able to respond more quickly to a second infection by the same pathogen, and thus are part of durable immunity.

The UAB researchers showed that the lung-resident memory B cells do not recirculate throughout the body after establishment in the lungs. They also showed that the lung-resident memory B cells had a different phenotype, as measured by cell surface markers, than the systemic memory B cells found in lymphoid tissue. The lung-resident memory B cells uniformly expressed the chemokine receptor, CXCR3, and they completely lacked the lymph node homing receptor, CD62L.

The crucial experiments to show that the non-circulating, influenza-specific memory B cells permanently resided in the lung involved parabiosis. A mouse of one strain was infected with influenza, then surgically connected with a different strain mouse six weeks later. After two weeks with a shared blood circulation, naïve B cells in the mediastinal lymph nodes and the spleens of both mice had equilibrated evenly among the two mice; but the memory B cells remained in the previously infected lung and did not migrate to the naïve lung.

Similar experiments of this type showed that inflammation in the naïve lung did not induce the lung memory cells to migrate to the inflamed naïve lung, and if each animal was infected with different strains of influenza, and then paired, the memory B cells for each strain of influenza remained in the lungs infected with that strain. The researchers also found — by shortening the time between infection and pairing — that the lung-resident memory B cells were established within two weeks of influenza infection.

Co-authors with Randall of the study, “The establishment of resident memory B cells in the lung requires local antigen encounter,” are S. Rameeza Allie, John E. Bradley and Uma Mudunuru, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, UAB Department of Medicine; and Michael D. Schultz, Beth A. Graf and Frances E. Lund, UAB Department of Microbiology.

Support came from National Institutes of Health grants AI078907, HL69409, AI100127, AI097357, AI109962 and AI120508.

At UAB, Randall holds the William J. Koopman Endowed Professorship in Rheumatology and Immunology, and Lund holds the Charles H. McCauley Chair of Microbiology.

Story Source:

Materials provided by University of Alabama at Birmingham. Original written by Jeff Hansen. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Share Button

Health24.com | 5 misconceptions about hearing loss

Hearing loss is something we tend to associate with ageing or serious, genetic disorders of the ear — you either become deaf as you grow older, or you are born deaf — and there is simply nothing in-between.

This and other misconceptions cause us to take healthy hearing for granted and not take proper care of our hearing. Here are some common myths:

1. If glasses can fully compensate for any visual problem, a hearing aid should be able to do the same for my hearing

The correct lenses may be able to give you 20/20 vision, but unfortunately it’s not the same with hearing aids and hearing. The brain needs to adjust to the quality of sound coming through the hearing aid. And while hearing aids can make a tremendous difference, the sound quality will not be the same as you were used to before you experienced hearing loss.

According to the Hearing Health Foundation, each person’s audiogram (a graph showing how sound is processed, ranging from the softest to the loudest sound) is vastly different, and therefore all hearing aids need to be programmed to suit the individual.

However, don’t let this stop you from getting a hearing aid. It does make a significant difference.

2. Hearing loss isn’t so bad — it doesn’t affect the rest of my body

Even though it isn’t life-threatening in any way, hearing loss can have a far-reaching impact on your well-being. According to Better Hearing, studies have shown that untreated hearing loss can lead to fatigue, stress, anxiety, depression, isolation, impaired concentration and productivity, and general deterioration of psychological and physical health.

It’s therefore important to take early steps to prevent hearing loss, acknowledge when you start having problems and seek help and treatment as soon as possible.

3. Hearing loss only affects the elderly

Hearing loss can happen gradually or suddenly at any stage of your life. While age-related hearing loss (presbycusis), caused by a change in the structure of the ear as we age, is one of the most common kinds of hearing loss, there are many other causes of hearing loss unrelated to age. One may suffer sudden hearing loss because of disease, or gradual hearing loss as a result of constant noise exposure.

The verdict? You are never too young to start taking care of your hearing or to get treatment for hearing loss. There is no stigma attached to wearing a hearing aid.

4. If I had ‘real’ hearing loss, I would have noticed it by now

Not true. Hearing loss can develop over an extended period of time and you might not even be aware that your hearing is deteriorating. Your general practitioner will also not pick up any changes to your hearing unless you are very specific about this concern. In America only 14% of doctors routinely screen for hearing, and in South Africa, you would need to see a specialist to know whether you are experiencing any real difference in your hearing.

A previous Health24 article explains how gradual hearing loss can occur. Here are some of the first signs of hearing loss:

  • Difficulty hearing people clearly the first time and asking them to repeat what they said, especially in noisy areas
  • Constantly having to turn up the volume of your music or television set
  • Having to concentrate hard while listening to someone
  • Difficulty hearing people over the phone

There are also some factors that might make you more susceptible to hearing loss than your peers. This may include severe noise exposure in your daily work situation, regularly listening to loud music through head- or earphones, regularly suffering from ear infections, a family history of hearing loss, or compromising your nervous system through unhealthy habits such as smoking.

5. I will look ‘disabled’ if I wear a hearing aid — I don’t need it

According the Hearing Health Foundation, insignificant hearing loss (only in one ear, not enough to be noticed etc.) can easily be dismissed but can still have an impact on cognitive skills such as driving, doing your job, talking to someone in a crowded location, or over the phone.

Hearing aids are not only for those who have severe hearing loss, but can also make a difference to those who are experiencing gradual hearing loss. If wearing a hearing aid can restore your quality of life and help you perform your daily tasks, there should be no stigma attached. Hearing aids are becoming visually more attractive and and many can fit into the ear canal where they are hardly visible.

Image credit: iStock

Share Button

Girls ‘more likely to face loneliness’

About one in 10 young people often feel lonely, with fears that loneliness will be seen as “failing”.

Share Button

Woman’s Botox party warning after lip filler swelling

Rachael Knappier’s lip fillers swelled up dramatically and left her needing hospital treatment.

Share Button

Stammer to sermon: A priest’s struggle with words

Fr Patrick Lagan says he knew from a young age that he wanted to become a priest despite his stammer.

Share Button

10 Foods That Fight Holiday Stress

These foods that can slash stress, curb anxiety, and help you make it to the New Year emotionally unscathed.

Share Button

Read This Before You Go Natural

In Part 1 of this series, Health outlined some of the hidden dangers of dietary supplements, including the shocking fact that they may not be as safe or as regulated as you assume. Part 2 of this special report investigates how we use natural cures—and why our habits may be jeopardizing our health.

 

 

 

fish-pills-capsule

Every morning Angie Gilstrap-Ross gulps down an herbal multivitamin; a capsule of black currant oil; a 1,000 IU vitamin D tablet; a capsule of licorice root and a capsule of Chinese herbs to tame her rosacea; and (two weeks out of every month) an echinacea–vitamin C tincture to boost her immune system.

But although Gilstrap-Ross, 45, takes these six supplements routinely, she balked last year when a doctor suggested that she go on a prescription heartburn medication to treat symptoms resulting from a hiatal hernia. "I'm antimedicine as a first line of defense—the strongest over-the-counter medicine I've taken in over a year is baby aspirin for headaches and body aches," says Gilstrap-Ross, a continuing-education program assistant in Greenville, South Carolina. "There's no way I'd take any other medications unless absolutely nothing else worked. The supplements I take now are herbal and all-natural. For me, they're much healthier than any medicine out there."

Like Gilstrap-Ross, many health-conscious women assume that natural remedies are safer, healthier, and just plain better than conventional medicine. In fact, according to a Health.com poll, 83% of you take some type of supplement at least occasionally, and 56% of you said you believe these products are safer for you than prescription or OTC drugs. "Since the 1990s, studies have shown that people clearly believe that the more natural a treatment is, the more desirable it is," says Tanya Edwards, MD, director of the Center for Integrative Medicine at the Cleveland Clinic. Patients are also increasingly interested in finding holistic solutions to their health problems, she adds: "We've seen a shift in the last 10 to 15 years where people have said, 'Whoa, we don't want to just use drugs to mask symptoms. We want to figure out underlying problems such as nutritional deficiencies, which are making the conditions worse.'"

But our belief that natural is always good—and more natural is even better—can lead us to take alarming risks, treating these supplements like food without considering the potential side effects many have. "Ninety percent of my patients, the first time they see me, come in with an entire bag of supplements, and quite often they have no idea what they're taking," says Alexander Kulick, MD, an integrative-medicine specialist and internist in New York City. "They assume that because these products are labeled as dietary supplements, they can take as much as they want without worrying about side effects, drug or supplement interactions, or overdoses. But the reality is, some of these natural remedies are pretty powerful stuff." Here's what every smart woman must know about going natural safely.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[ pagebreak ]
Keeping your doctor out of the loop is a risky move
Quick question: When was the last time you checked with your doctor before trying a new vitamin or all-natural cold cure? If you can't recall ever doing so, you're not alone. Only 31% of respondents in our Health.com poll say they always discuss their supplement use with their doctors. It may not even occur to us that we should. "Women want to take care of themselves—after reading so many scary reports about drug recalls, they want to feel like they are in control of their own health care," Dr. Kulick says. And because we get supplements not only from the drugstore or health-food store but also from nutritionists, spas, or even salons, they seem harmless and out of the realm of our medical doctor. But not discussing them with your doc is risky. "Most supplements on the market have potential adverse effects, just like a prescription or OTC medication," says Evangelia Davanos, PharmD, pharmacotherapy specialist at the Brooklyn Hospital Center in Brooklyn, New York.
 

One reason we don't broach this subject with our MDs is we suspect they're not very up on herbal cures—or will scoff at us for being interested in them. And we may not be wrong about that. While more and more consumers are embracing supplements (to the tune of more than 25 billion dollars in sales per year)—and more physicians are learning about them, Dr. Kulick says—some doctors are still skeptical about them. And that can make us less willing to talk. "Patients are pretty sophisticated at picking up negative vibes from their doctors, and it creates a communication barrier between patients and physicians," says pharmacologist Joe Graedon, MS, creator of peoplespharmacy.com.

And in this age of HMOs—when doctors are squeezed for every precious minute—you may get more individualized attention at a health-food store. "Research shows that the average time a doctor spends with a patient is about seven-and-a-half minutes," says Mark Moyad, MD, MPH, Jenkins/Pokempner Director of Preventive and Alternative Medicine at the University of Michigan Medical Center. "But patients tell me they go to the health-food store, and the guy behind the counter spends 15 minutes with them discussing a product. Is it any wonder why they follow his recommendations? He's giving them twice the time." Unfortunately, attention doesn't equal expertise: An investigation from the U.S. Government Accountability Office published this past May found that sales staff at herbal-supplement retailers often gave incorrect or even potentially harmful advice, such as saying it was safe to take an herb-and-drug combination that could increase one's risk of bleeding or telling a customer they could take a supplement instead of a doctor-prescribed medication.

When Luann Smith, 45, started feeling stressed and anxious, her doctor prescribed Xanax, but advised her not to take it long-term. She found another option at her local health-food store in Chesapeake, Virginia, where one of the clerks suggested that she take St. John's wort to boost her mood, as well as melatonin to help her sleep at night. Both have potential side effects, ranging from dizziness and rashes to stomach cramps and diarrhea, that she wasn't warned about. They can also interact with other medications. Melatonin, for example, may slow blood clotting, increasing the risk of bleeding when taken with medications that also slow clotting, such as naproxen—which Smith takes occasionally for neck pain.

 

 

[ pagebreak ]

pills-candy-wrappers

Natural cures can interact with your meds—or with each other
Dangerous interactions are, in fact, a risk with many supplements, especially if your doctor doesn't know everything you're taking. Last spring, Davanos saw a 40-something woman who had been complaining of severe muscle aches. "I asked her if she was taking any medications, and she said she was on one of the cholesterol-lowering statins," Davanos recalls. "But when I asked her if she was taking any vitamins or natural remedies, she revealed that she was also taking a high dose of red yeast rice supplement. I said to her, 'You realize the red yeast rice can have the same effect as the statin, right? So it's like doubling your medication dose.' She was totally shocked—she hadn't even bothered to tell her doctor, because she assumed that since it was 'natural,' it was completely safe."

Yet even some of the most innocuous-seeming of these products can lead to problems when combined with medications. Fish oil, for example, can cause problems if used before surgery or at the same time as anticoagulant drugs, because high doses of fish oil may slow blood clotting. Supplements can interact with each other, too; for example, taking both ginkgo and folic acid could increase the risk of seizure, to name one potentially dangerous combo.

"When I see patients, I actually use a computer program that tells me immediately whether the supplements they are on can interact with any drugs they are taking, to prevent problems down the road," says Marcelle Pick, a nurse practitioner and co-founder of the Women to Women clinic in Yarmouth, Maine.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[ pagebreak ]
Supplements aren't a substitute for medicine
Some women may be hesitant to go on prescription drugs because of their cost, potential side effects, or the idea that it seems to label them as having an illness. So instead of taking the antidepressant or cholesterol-lowering medication that their doctor recommends (and that clinical trials, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) review, and real-world experience have shown to be safe and effective), they might decide to try something that seems a little less extreme, a supplement that appears to be a more "natural" option. (More than half of you have done this, according to our poll.) "I have had patients who took it upon themselves to come off medications for blood pressure or cholesterol and only took supplements," Dr. Edwards says. Luckily, her patients suffered no immediate ill effects beyond their blood pressure and cholesterol levels rising, and their levels went back down when they were placed back on medication. But untreated high blood pressure, for example, can damage the heart and blood vessels, and in extreme cases can damage the eyes, brain, and kidneys, too.

Supplements aren't intended to treat diseases—in fact, FDA regulations prohibit manufacturers from labeling them as treating, preventing, or curing a disease or condition. What's more, by turning to supplements instead of medications when you really need the latter, you're putting your health at risk—not only because you're not treating the underlying disease, but also because you can end up with new problems you'd never even thought of, from side effects to allergic reactions, says Ann Kulze, MD, a family physician in Charleston, South Carolina. "I can't tell you how many patients I've had come in with severe rashes, and upon questioning I've found out that they haven't been taking the medications I prescribed and instead were relying on expensive boutique-brand supplements that triggered the problem," she says.

 

 

[ pagebreak ]
The Internet doesn't have a medical degree
Adding to our misuse of natural remedies is the fact that many of us are getting our info primarily from the Internet. According to our poll, 83% of you go online for information on what supplements to take, and 53% say the web is the number-one place you turn to learn about natural cures. Unfortunately, experts say, people finding misinformation online is all too common. "A lot of my patients decide which supplements to take based on what they read on the Internet," Pick says. "The problem is, there's some crazy stuff on message boards out there. I've seen women on 50,000 IU of vitamin D—a potentially toxic dose—based on the recommendation of someone they met in a chat room."

Online sleuthing is how 23-year-old Melissa McMillan decided that vitamin A might be the miracle cure for her acne. "I'd been on and off Accutane since I was 16, but you're not supposed to be on the drug for more than a few months at a time, and every time I'd go off of it, my acne would flare up again," the Lubbock, Texas, college student recalls. Determined to find a solution, McMillan started researching and found that some web sites were recommending megadoses of vitamin A. "For the past year, I've been taking five to ten 8,000 IU pills per day, and I've found that it keeps my skin clear and beautiful," she says.

McMillan is taking between 40,000 and 80,000 IU of vitamin A a day—but the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Dietary Supplements doesn't recommend taking more than 10,000 IU daily. "You can start seeing adverse effects with chronic use at high doses," says Stephen Stone, MD, a professor of dermatology at the Southern Illinois University School of Medicine in Springfield, Illinois. McMillan says she's on the lookout for potential side effects, such as chapped lips and dry, flaky skin, but "you don't always get those warning signs before running into real problems like severe headaches, bone and joint pain, or liver damage," Dr. Stone says. (If you're pregnant, high doses of A can also cause birth defects.) He adds, "It worries me to hear that some women are possibly risking their lives based on information they found on the Internet."

 

 

[ pagebreak ]
There's such a thing as too much natural
Even some physicians make the mistake of thinking you can't possibly overdo all-natural remedies. "A decade ago, I was taking 12 different supplements a day, including a multivitamin, calcium, vitamin D, and fish oil," Dr. Kulze says. "Then I developed a severe case of dry eye, so my doctor ran tests to figure out what was going on. We thought it might be an autoimmune disease like lupus, until I did some research and realized it could be an early sign of vitamin A toxicity. When I looked at all my supplements I realized I was getting a little more vitamin A than is now recommended. And we know that the fat-soluble form of vitamin A can build up in the body over time to the point of toxicity. I stopped all the supplements cold turkey, and sure enough, after a couple months, the dry eye resolved. But it had never even initially occurred to me that I was at risk for an overdose."

In fact, many vitamins may turn dangerous in large amounts. "The dose makes the poison," says David Katz, MD, director of the Yale Prevention Research Center. "Something that is essential for life can turn on you if the dose is wrong."

Adding to the problem: When you layer fortified foods and beverages on top of supplements, you may be getting too much without even realizing it, causing potentially harmful imbalances in nutrients, Dr. Katz says.

And it's not just vitamins that are the problem, either. "When a patient asks if they should take zinc to ward off a cold, I say no," Dr. Moyad says. "It's very easy to pop large amounts of these lozenges like candy, which can lead to zinc toxicity, which not only suppresses your immune system, so you'll actually get sicker, but also damages taste and nerve receptors. There's also some evidence that very high levels of zinc may actually be detrimental to your heart health."

 

 

[ pagebreak ]
You can take them safely
There's no need to swear off supplements entirely—in fact, experts stress that both conventional and alternative medicine can be part of a healthy life, provided you take a few precautions. First, check with your physician or a pharmacist before taking any supplement, even if it's just a multivitamin or fish oil, Dr. Moyad says. You should also present a list of supplements you're taking to your primary care physician at each annual checkup, and to any physician you see if they prescribe you something new or ask what drugs you're currently taking.

When going online to research supplements, look to impartial, research-backed sites such as those sponsored by the NIH, including the Office of Dietary Supplements (ods.od.nih.gov) and the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (nccam.nih.gov). Avoid getting advice from message boards or manufacturer web sites; look for sites that end in .gov or .edu, or that are from a major medical institution like the Mayo Clinic or other national organizations like the American Medical Association. Don't chase the latest studies—if headlines proclaim that B vitamins boost your memory or vitamin D prevents breast cancer, discuss it with your doctor. The best advice is based on years of research, not a single news-making study, says Pieter Cohen, MD, assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School. Never replace a medication you've been prescribed with a supplement unless your doctor expressly says it's OK to do so, and always let your MD know if you have any unusual symptoms after starting a supplement, such as headaches or rashes.

Finally, it's important to keep some perspective, Dr. Katz says. "The grass is always greener on the other side of the fence. When we lived in a world where nature was in charge, we did everything we could to get away from it," he says. "When we first realized infections were caused by microbes, and that we could control that with sanitation and drugs, that was considered a great thing. Now that our world is dominated by medicine, we want to get back to natural healing. It's true that there is healing power in nature, but nature also gave us botulism and smallpox. You can go too far in either direction. Remedies and harms can come from both test tubes and tree leaves."

 

 

 

Share Button

10 Ways to Live to 100

 

No one really wants to think about aging, but let's face it: the habits you practice now can play a role in how long you'll live, and how much life you'll have in your years.

The world's oldest man, Polish immigrant Alexander Imich, passed away on Sunday in New York City at the age of 111. That's way longer than the average American male life expectancy of 76, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

While Imich told The New York Times that he chalked up his longevity to good genes, there are healthy habits you can pick up to help you live a longer, happier life. Here are some ideas:

Find a hobby
Doing something you find truly fulfilling will give you a sense of accomplishment, and can help reduce stress.

Floss!
Flossing does more than clean your teeth: Getting all that inflammation-causing bacteria off your gums can reduce your risk of heart disease and stroke.

Plan a vacay
Taking a break from work can lower your risk of heart disease and add 1 to 2 years to your life.

Rest up
Your body repairs cells during sleep, so skimping on it doesn't do your body any favors. Plus, adequate sleep also affects your quality of life. Aim for 7 to 8 hours of shut-eye per night.

Get busy
Having sex releases the feel-good hormone oxytocin, another stress reliever. Plus, a study from the University of Quebec found that women burn 3 calories per minute of sex while men burn 4.

Be social
People with stronger friendships were 50% more likely to live longer than those with weaker connections, a 2010 analysis found. That makes the impact of friendlessness comparable to that of smoking (more on that below).

Eat right
You need to fuel your body with healthy foods to live a long life. Limit your intake of foods high in fat, salt, and added sugar (which can increase your risk of heart disease, obesity, and other chronic diseases) and look for superfoods rich in vitamins, minerals, fiber, and protein.

Hit the gym
Not only is exercise good for the heart, but working out can trigger the release of endorphins, pain-relieving chemicals known to boost your mood. Shoot for at least 150 minutes of moderate exercise a week, per the CDC.

Beat stress
A study published in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism found that high levels of the stress hormone cortisol are associated with an increased risk of dying from cardiovascular disease. That's even more reason to take up calming activities, like meditation and yoga.

Stop smoking and limit drinking
Imich, a former smoker, swore off both cigarettes and alcohol and you should follow his lead—at lease when it comes to the cigs. Smoking causes one out of 5 deaths in the U.S. each year, according to the CDC. Moderate alcohol consumption is good for you, but experts recommend that women have no more than one drink per day (or up to 7 per week); for men it's 1 to 2 drinks per day, or a max of 14 per week.

MORE:
Why It’s SO Important to Keep Exercising as You Age
A Purposeful Life May Be a Longer Life
4 Healthy Aging Secrets From My 99-Year-Old Aunt

 

Share Button