The country will enjoy an additional bank holiday on May 8 next year, two days after the ceremony takes place.
An extra bank holiday also took place when the King’s mother, Queen Elizabeth II, ascended to the throne in 1953.
It also follows the bank holiday which was held to mark the late Queen’s funeral in September.
The prime minister said: “The coronation of a new monarch is a unique moment for our country. In recognition of this historic occasion, I am pleased to announce an additional bank holiday for the whole United Kingdom next year.
“I look forward to seeing people come together to celebrate and pay tribute to King Charles III by taking part in local and national events across the country in his honour.”
Oliver Dowden, the chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, said: “The coronation combines the sacred and the solemn but it is also celebratory.
“This bank holiday will once again give people across the United Kingdom the opportunity to come together as families and communities to welcome His Majesty to the throne as we mark this important day in our nation’s long history.”
Rishi Sunak has been urged to sack Sir Gavin Williamson after details emerged of abusive text messages he sent to the former government chief whip.
The Cabinet Office minister accused Wendy Morton of using the death of the Queen to “punish” senior MPs who were out of favour with Liz Truss’s government.
Advertisement
According to text messages between the pair published by the Sunday Times, Sir Gavin told her: “Well let’s see how many more times you fuck us all over. There is a price for everything.”
The paper said the then party chairman, Sir Jake Berry, informed Sunak the day before he entered Number 10 that Morton had submitted a formal complaint to the party about Sir Gavin’s conduct.
Both Sir Jake and Morton lost their jobs in the ensuing reshuffle while Sir Gavin – a former chief whip and a supporter of Mr Sunak – returned to government.
In the text messages, Sir Gavin said it was “very poor” that privy councillors like him who “aren’t favoured” had been excluded from the funeral at Westminster Abbey.
Advertisement
Despite Morton’s repeated insistence that there was not enough space for all privy councillors to attend the event, Sir Gavid replied: “Well certainly looks it which think is very shit and perception becomes reality. Also don’t forget I know how this works so don’t puss me about.
“It’s very clear how you are going to treat a number of us which is very stupid and you are showing fuck all interest in pulling things together.
“Also this shows exactly how you have rigged it is is (sic) disgusting you are using her death to punish people who are just supportive, absolutely disgusting.”
“Well let’s see how many more times you fuck us all over. There is a price for everything.”
Sir Jake Berry told the paper that he was told on October 24 that a complaint had been made against Sir Gavin regarding allegations of “bullying and intimidation of parliamentary colleagues”.
He said: “In compliance with protocol, in my capacity as party chairman, I informed both the new prime minister and his incoming chief of staff about the complaint on the same day.”
Advertisement
According to the Sunday Times, the PM did not recall the “specifics” of their conversation.
Sir Gavin, who is also a former chief whip, has twice been sacked from cabinet – once by Theresa May for leaking details of a national security council meeting and by Boris Johnson as education secretary over the Covid-19 A-levels debacle.
A Tory spokesman told HuffPost UK: “The Conservative Party has a robust complaints process in place.”
Liberal Democrat deputy leader Daisy Cooper said: “These shocking revelations raise yet more serious questions about Rishi Sunak’s judgement.
“Gavin Williamson should never have been reappointed to cabinet after the damage he did to our children’s education.
“Now it emerges that on top that Sunak ignored a complaint about Williamson’s behaviour.
“If the prime minister was serious about restoring integrity he would sack Gavin Williamson. Instead, once again he is prioritising the interests of the Conservative Party over those of the country.”
Advertisement
Deputy Labour leader Angela Rayner said: “It beggars belief that Rishi Sunak claims not to remember a conversation just days ago with the Tory chair about a serious complaint against a controversial appointee to his own Cabinet.
“It’s not just the Prime Minister’s memory that’s in question, but his judgement. In his desperation to dodge a vote, he put party management before the country, doing grubby deals to appoint multiple ministers accused of misconduct.
“Gavin Williamson was sacked from cabinet twice, yet despite risking national security, he’s back at the heart of government.
“Rishi Sunak’s pledge to restore integrity, professionalism and accountability has been exposed as nothing more than hollow words. Far from stopping the rot in Downing Street, he’s letting it fester.”
Sir Gavin told The Sunday Times: “I of course regret getting frustrated about the way colleagues and I felt we were being treated.
Advertisement
“I am happy to speak with Wendy and I hope to work positively with her in the future as I have in the past.”
A Marks and Spencer boss and former Tory frontbencher has criticised the government’s inflammatory language on immigration, warning that “the public is thirsting for a more civil discourse”.
Archie Norman, chairman of the retailer and an MP between 1997 and 2005, said Conservatives during his time in the shadow cabinet under William Hague “would never have used that language”.
Advertisement
Home secretary Suella Braverman claimed the UK was suffering an “invasion” over the numbers of migrants trying to reach the country.
It was followed on Friday by Home Office minister Chris Philp criticising the “cheek” of complaints from people arriving in the country “illegally” about processing centre conditions.
💥NEW: M&S Chairman Archie Norman slams Suella Braverman’s inflammatory language on immigration; he tells @cathynewman ‘the public is thirsting for a more civil discourse, a more grown-up discourse. When you’re going into crisis, you don’t want this partisanship.’ @TimesRadio
Appearing on Times Radio, Norman said under Hague “we would never have used that language, and the reason we didn’t is partly because it does mean that you trespass on very sensitive areas and you start appealing to people’s base emotions about race, about immigration, about people coming here from abroad”, and added: “I just think you have to be very careful.”
Advertisement
He continued: “I think one of things we saw with the Liz Truss episode, and probably with the Queen’s funeral, is the public is thirsting for a more civil sort of discourse, a more grown-up discourse.
“When you’re going into crisis, you really don’t want this partisanship. You want people willing to come together as a nation, as nations, and across the party divide.”
“I mean, we had a convulsion…I’m not saying there’s no damage to that, but we’re back in a stable place now.”
The comments come amid overcrowding chaos at the Manston holding centre in Kent, where at one point as many as 4,000 people were being detained for weeks in a site intended to hold 1,600 for a matter of days.
Meanwhile, immigration minister Robert Jenrick was heckled by some residents while visiting Dover with local MP Natalie Elphicke, while a woman in the town said her teenage son had been beaten up after she spoke out in the media over what has been happening.
Advertisement
Close to 40,000 migrants have arrived in the UK after crossing the Channel so far this year. But no crossings have been recorded by the Ministry of Defence over the last three days.
Thousands of young people are being groomed, harmed and “even killed” because systems are failing them, a scathing report has found.
Primary school children are running drugs for gangs and teenagers are heading up county lines operations, according to the former children’s commissioner.
Advertisement
Anne Longfield is now calling on the government to create “Sure Start Plus” – a national plan to stop teenagers getting involved in gangs and violence.
Her report, Hidden In Plain Sight, warns of a crisis putting hundreds of thousands of children at risk in England.
Younger children are being targeted by gangs as well as children from typically middle class backgrounds, with social media used to lure them.
Former children’s commissioner for England Anne Longfield.
Russell Sach/Children’s Commissioner for England via PA Media
Advertisement
The report said a combination of Covid, a cost-of-living crisis, and any return to austerity would be a “gift” to those who exploit children.
Longfield, who heads up the Commission on Young Lives, said: “There are parts of our country where the state is completely failing in its duty to protect vulnerable children from the ongoing epidemic of county lines, criminal exploitation, and serious violence.”
She described a housing estate where residents were being “terrorised” by a gang of drug dealing 14 year olds who wear balaclavas and “dish out acts of violence”.
“They carried knives and other weapons, which in turn was encouraging other young people in the area to carry knives for protection,” her foreword said.
“What is happening on this estate may sound like an extreme example, but it is far from unique.
“Speak to youth workers in our towns and cities and they will tell you their own horror stories: of young people being chased in broad daylight by other teenagers waving machetes, of homes where the young people involved in the drugs trade are the main breadwinner in the family, of communities where organised criminals seek out and groom very vulnerable children who have fallen through gaps in the care, health, or education systems, almost with impunity.”
Advertisement
She said there were parts of the country where the state was “completely failing” in its duty to protect vulnerable children.
“So often these are already the most marginalised families. So often they are black, brown and minority ethnic. So often they are poor.”
However, she said the epidemic of country lines was not limited to inner cities, adding: “I have heard countless examples of children from suburban, middle-class England being groomed by criminals.”
Government figures covering 2021-22 show there were 11,600 instances where gangs were a factor and 10,140 instances where child criminal exploitation was a factor in assessments of children in need – which the commission believes is the tip of the iceberg.
Estimates suggest there could be as many as 200,000 children in England aged 11 to 17 who are vulnerable to serious violence.
Advertisement
Those most at risk are teenagers growing up in poverty, in deprived areas, and they are disproportionately from black, brown and minority ethnic backgrounds.
The commission warned that social care, education, family support, and children’s mental health systems were failing thousands of vulnerable teenagers and costing billions.
They said Sure Start Plus programmes could be partly financed by the millions of pounds recovered from the proceeds of crime every year.
They would initially be placed in the areas of greatest need and bring local services together to provide bespoke services for families and children who need it.
They are named after the New Labour “Sure Start” programme aimed at giving children the best start in life that was then scrapped by the Tory government.
Advertisement
The Commission suggested a one off £1 billion children and young people’s mental health recovery programme, part-financed by a levy on social media companies and mobile phone providers.
And they also called for the government to hold regular Cobra meetings to tackle the scourge of serious violence.
Labour’s shadow education secretary, Bridget Phillipson, said the Conservatives were failing children.
“12 years of Conservative neglect has eroded the systems that keep children safe and that put young people on the path to fulfilling futures, blighting lives and costing taxpayers in the process,” she said.
HuffPost UK contacted the department for education for comment.
Questions have been raised over the home secretary’s use of a military helicopter to tour chaotic immigration centres on England’s southern coast.
Suella Braverman arrived at the Manston migrant holding centre near Ramsgate on Thursday in a Chinook helicopter, having earlier visited Dover to view the Western Jet Foil immigration facility and meet the Coastguard.
Advertisement
The distance between Dover and Manston is about 20 miles by road and could take around 40 minutes to drive.
According to defence analysts writing for the UK Defence Journal, a Chinook costs about £3,500 per hour to fly.
The helicopter’s maximum speed is 302km per hour (about 187mph), according to its manufacturer, Boeing.
After landing, Braverman and her entourage were transferred from the helicopter to a black BMW with tinted windows.
Advertisement
The minister has faced widespread condemnation in recent days for characterising the influx of migrants as an “invasion”.
It costs about £3,500 an hour to keep a Chinook in the air. I guess we now know the cost of an embattled Home Secretary… 🚁 https://t.co/1SCeX3E4FN
The Home Office explained the minster took the helicopter to get a birds-eye view of efforts to tackle people smuggling in the English Channel.
It is understood the flight left the Coastguard HQ at around 1.25pm and arrived back to shore just after 2pm.
Braverman is under mounting political pressure over the illegal conditions at the Manston site, where at one point as many as 4,000 people were being detained for weeks in a site intended to hold 1,600 for a matter of days. The number has since reduced to 2,700, after more than 1,000 were moved in the last few days.
Advertisement
A Home Office spokesperson, said: “As part of the home secretary’s efforts to tackle vile people smuggling in the Channel, the home secretary was briefed by clandestine Channel threat commander, Dan O’Mahoney in Dover.
“The home secretary then travelled in a military aircraft with Mr O’Mahoney to get a view of operations in the Channel first hand.”
Rishi Sunak made a lot of promises during this summer’s Tory leadership election.
From immigration to tax, the former chancellor unveiled a long list of policies aimed at persuading the Conservative rank and file to choose him over Liz Truss.
His campaign was ultimately unsuccessful, with Truss triumphing by 57 to 43 per cent.
It has now emerged, however, that every single pledge and “guarantee” he made during the leadership contest is now under review and may never be implemented.
His spokesperson said: “Obviously, those are pledges that were made a few months ago now and the context is somewhat different, obviously, economically.”
Here are some of the most eye-catching promises which will probably never see the light of day.
Sunak the tax-cutter
Trailing his rival badly in the polls, Sunak was forced to ditch his previous refusal to promise tax cuts by announcing that he would reduce the basic rate of income tax to 16p in the pound by 2029.
He said: “What I’m putting to people today is a vision to deliver the biggest income tax cut since Margaret Thatcher’s government. It is a radical vision but it is also a realistic one.”
Advertisement
Not that realistic, given his spokesperson today refused to say whether he still stands by it.
Controlling Britain’s borders
In July, the ‘Ready For Rishi’ campaign unveiled a 10-point plan to “take back control of our borders” by cracking down on illegal immigration.
Among the pledges were vows to “reform our broken asylum laws” and give parliament the power to set an annual cap on the number of refugees allowed to settle in the UK.
There were also promises to “hold the French to account” for the number of small boats carrying immigrants across the English Channel and end the “farce” of asylum seekers being put up in hotels.
But despite still supporting the “sentiment” of his own pledges, Sunak’s spokesperson confirmed that the 10-point plan is also now being assessed to check whether it is, in fact, “deliverable”.
Stopping the ‘war on motorists’
Road-users who thought that a Sunak premiership may usher in a golden age are also set to be disappointed.
Advertisement
In August, he pledged to ban new smart motorways, clamp down on “rogue private parking fines ripping off” drivers and review controversial low traffic neighbourhood schemes.
Sunak declared: “As chancellor I introduced the largest cut to fuel duty in a generation, and as prime minister I will go further so that we stop the war on motorists once and for all.”
Now, less than three months later, those promises are no longer set in stone.
Reforming education
Sunak vowed “radically reform education” if he became prime minister.
His promises included creating a “Russell Group of world class technical colleges” to rival the best in the world and “embrace new technology in our schools to provide teaching resources, reduce workloads and inspire pupils with new ways of learning”.
“Every child deserves a world-class education and, if I become prime minister, I will make it my mission from day one to ensure that’s what they get,” Sunak said.
Now that he is in Number 10, however, that is another promise which has been put on the back burner.
Saving the high street
Sunak said he would “rejuvenate high streets up and down the country” if he became PM, with plans to slash the number of empty shops by 2025, bring in tougher punishments for graffiti and littering, and supporting farmers’ markets.
Advertisement
“I have been clear that I have a plan to rebuild our economy; our high streets are a crucial part of that,” Sunak said in a press release issued at the end of July.
But like every other promise he made in the summer, Sunak’s plan to save the high streets has already.
Boris Johnson is to continue his burgeoning career away from Downing Street by giving the keynote speech at a blockchain and cryptocurrency conference in Singapore.
The former prime minister, who remains the MP for Uxbridge and South Ruislip, will appear at the International Symposium on Blockchain Advancement on December 2.
Advertisement
The conference is being organised by ParallelChain Lab, a blockchain technology company that “is reimaginging the use of blockchain in the digital economy”.
Dick Cheney, the former US vice president, is also speaking at the conference.
In September, Johnson was paid £130,000 to give a speech to a group of US insurance brokers in Colorado.
The Times reported that the speech was greeted with a standing ovation as he gave his assessment of the situation in Ukraine.
Advertisement
Johnson has also set up his own office, likely to be the vehicle for accepting earnings, registering The Office of Boris Johnson Ltd with Companies House.
Meanwhile, Johnson has confirmed he will attend the Cop27 conference in Egypt, piling further pressure on Rishi Sunak to backtrack on his decision to snub the climate summit.
The ex-PM said he was “happy to go” to Sharm El Sheikh for the United Nations meeting opening on Sunday.
However, Sunak is leaving his own decision to the last minute, having initially ruled out attending before signalling he could U-turn in the face of widespread criticism.
Johnson told Sky News “yes, as it happens” he will be attending, adding: “I was invited by the Egyptians so I’m very happy to go.”
Advertisement
Asked if his successor in No 10 should go too, he said Sunak has a “massive amount to do” with the government’s domestic agenda, adding: “I happen to have a particular interest.”
It came as Johnson said he does not believe Vladimir Putin will use a tactical nuclear weapon in the conflict with Ukraine, as it would be “crazy” to wreak “total disaster” on his own country.
The former prime minister said the act would “immediately tender Russia’s resignation from the club of civilised nations” and plunge the country into a “kind of cryogenic economic freeze”.
He added that he suspects it would trigger an “absolutely hysterical reaction” in Russia itself.
Former health secretary Matt Hancock’s book about the coronavirus pandemic will be out in time for Christmas, social media users were less than thrilled to learn.
The West Suffolk MP, whose Pandemic Diaries is slated for release on December 6, resigned as health secretary after footage leaked of him breaching his own covid rules by kissing his aide Gina Coladangelo. Almost 207,000 people in the UK have died with Covid-19 on their death certificate.
Advertisement
Suffolk News reported a statement from his office saying: “Mr Hancock will give his unique perspective on how the NHS rose to the challenge, recognising the incredible hard work and sacrifice of so many, and offers an honest assessment of the lessons we need to learn for next time – because there will be a next time.”
Twitter had some thoughts, principally that Hancock has finally gone full Alan Partridge.
Advertisement
And the cover design left a lot to be desired.
i am aware that in the grand scheme of things this is maybe not the most important issue but jesus the photoshop work on matt hancock’s book cover is awful, awful pic.twitter.com/w2YBlWoPWg
The general response was one of second-hand embarrassment.
And if it does turn out to be your stocking filler, you may need to re-assess some relationships.
Imagine if someone bought you Matt Hancock’s book for Christmas. Nearly 400 pages of how he killed a load of care home residents then rogered his secretary.
Home secretary Suella Braverman has been accused of “whipping-up hate” by characterising small boats crossing the English Channel as an “invasion” – but her rhetoric has won applause from Nigel Farage.
The under-fire minister used a Commons statement on the chaos surrounding the Manston migrant holding centre in Kent to deliver inflammatory comments that were widely condemned. They came a day after another holding centre in Dover was petrol bombed.
Advertisement
She told MPs: “Let’s be clear about what is really going on here: the British people deserve to know which party is serious about stopping the invasion on our southern coast and which party is not.
“Some 40,000 people have arrived on the south coast this year alone. Many of them facilitated by criminal gangs, some of them actual members of criminal gangs.
“So let’s stop pretending that they are all refugees in distress. The whole country knows that is not true. It’s only the honourable members opposite who pretend otherwise.
“We need to be straight with the public. The system is broken. Illegal migration is out of control and too many people are interested in playing political parlour games, covering up the truth than solving the problem.”
Advertisement
To describe the serious and complex situation created by the asylum crisis as an “invasion” is appalling, wrong and dangerous. These are men, women and children fleeing war, persecution and conflict.
The day after a fire-bomb attack on a migrant centre and instead of pledging solidarity for the victims the Home Secretary brands them part of an invasion. She brings disgrace to her office and country.
Braverman later agreed with suggestions from Tory MP Lee Anderson that some migrants can “get on a dinghy and go straight back to France” if they believe the accommodation in the UK is not good enough.
Advertisement
The Refugee Council described the home secretary’s comments as “appalling, wrong and dangerous”, and Labour MP Zarah Sultana hit out at language that “whips-up hate and spreads division”. “She’s totally unfit to be home secretary,” she added.
But she won the support of former Ukip and Brexit Party leader Farage, who said on Twitter: “Suella Braverman, who is under attack from Remainers and the globalists, has said what is happening in the Channel is an invasion. It’s a word I’ve been using for two years and been condemned for.”
He added: “Believe me, the Establishment are out to get her because she’s got the guts to say many of these people are just not refugees. Well done her.”
Suella Braverman agrees with Tory MP Lee Anderson that migrants can “get on a dinghy and go straight back to France” if they believe accommodation in the UK is not good enough, adds: “Any complaints that the accommodation isn’t good enough is frankly indulgent and ungrateful.” pic.twitter.com/mOYwx5RKOw
The Channel crossing crisis has deepened amid growing concern over the conditions in which migrants are being held while waiting to be processed once they arrive in the UK.
Advertisement
Conditions at the site at Manston were last week described by independent chief inspector of borders and immigration, David Neal, as “pretty wretched”.
The home secretary said around 40,000 people have arrived on the south coast of England in 2022, more than double the number of arrivals via the English Channel in 2021.
Braverman also defended her decision to keep thousands of people at the migrant centre after some of her colleagues accused her of deliberately ignoring legal advice to transfer people from the site to hotels.
Intended to house around 1,500 migrants for less than 24 hours at a time, numbers have swelled to more than double that, with one Afghan family saying they had been there for 32 days.
Braverman was reappointed by prime minister Rishi Sunak last week, six days after she resigned from the same role for sending a government document from her personal email to an employee of a member of parliament in breach of the rules.
Advertisement
Opposition parties and even some members of parliament in the governing Conservative Party have questioned her suitability for the role.
On Monday, Braverman acknowleged she had sent official government documents to her personal email address six times, raising fresh concerns about breaches of ministerial rules while in charge of the nation’s security.
Suella Braverman has characterised the UK’s migration system as “broken” as she claimed “illegal immigration is out of control”.
The home secretary, facing questions in the Commons over the chaos at the Manston migrant holding centre in Kent, was reminded by a Labour MP that the Conservative Party had been in power for 12 years.
Advertisement
Braverman also claimed the southern coast of England is facing an “invasion” of migrants – a day after a holding centre in Dover was petrol bombed.
The home secretary’s fiery rhetoric came during a defiant address where she claimed to speak for the “patriotic majority of British people” who want safe and secure borders.
During questions, Braverman even audaciously accused a Labour MP of using “inflammatory language”.
It comes as the Channel crossing crisis deepened, amid growing concern over the conditions in which migrants are being held while waiting to be processed once they arrive in the UK, and after one of the sites in Dover was firebombed.
In the Commons, Braverman opted to go on the attack and make the issue party political as she accused the Labour Party of playing “political parlour games”.
Advertisement
She told MPs: “Let’s be clear about what is really going on here: the British people deserve to know which party is serious about stopping the invasion on our southern coast and which party is not.
“Some 40,000 people have arrived on the south coast this year alone. Many of them facilitated by criminal gangs, some of them actual members of criminal gangs.
“So let’s stop pretending that they are all refugees in distress. The whole country knows that is not true. It’s only the honourable members opposite who pretend otherwise.
“We need to be straight with the public. The system is broken. Illegal migration is out of control and too many people are interested in playing political parlour games, covering up the truth than solving the problem.”
Disgusted to hear Suella Braverman say there’s an “invasion on our southern coast”, just a day after a migrant detention centre was fire-bombed.
Language like this – portraying migrants as “invaders” – whips-up hate & spreads division.
Utterly despicable for Braverman to use the language of the far right and speak of an ‘invasion’. To choose this kind of inflammatory language a day after the attack on the Dover migrant centre makes it even worse. This is dangerous and unhinged. https://t.co/B2quVQgzpn
A mere day after a detention centre for refugees was bombed, Suella Braverman refers to refugees crossing the channel as an “invasion”. Attacks on refugees don’t come out of nowhere; they are the end result of hate and xenophobia whipped up by politicians and media outlets.
In another defiant comment, Braverman said “there are some people who would prefer to be rid of me”.
Braverman was heckled by Labour MPs, before adding: “Let them try. I know that I speak for the decent, law-abiding, patriotic majority of British people from every background that wants safe and secure borders.
“Labour is running scared that this party might just deliver them.”
Labour MP Zarah Sultana was among the first to condemn language that’s “whips-up hate and spreads division”. “She’s totally unfit to be home secretary,” she added.
So far this year close to 40,000 people have made the treacherous journey from France, crossing the world’s busiest shipping lanes in dinghies and other small boats, provisional government figures show.
Advertisement
On Sunday, police said two or three incendiary devices were thrown at a migrant processing centre in Dover and caused a fire.
The suspect, a 66-year-old man from High Wycombe, was identified and found dead at a nearby petrol station, Kent Police said.
Two people inside the centre at Western Jet Foil were left with minor injuries.
Although the site remained open, 700 people were moved to Manston for safety reasons.