NaNoWriMo – Days 4-5

Here are my latest progress updates for my novel:

Day 4

I had a very pleasant writing session on this day, now at 6872 words total. I’m starting to enjoy this more as the scenes are coming together, and I’m getting more familiar with the key characters.

I spent some time organizing the manuscript scene structure before I wrote any scenes this time. I created placeholders for the remaining signpost scenes, found a cleaner way to arrange my existing notes, and did a little more journaling with my characters.

In general I find that journaling with my characters and asking them what we ought to write today is a great way to begin each writing session. This is basically the method from Stature called “Chorus” applied to fiction.

Another ace of a habit is listening to brain.fm focus tracks while writing. When using the phone app version, I prefer the “deep work” tracks for this type of work. Oddly the “creative flow” tracks tend to make me sleepy.

On Day 4 I wrote two more signpost scenes:

  • The Doorway of No Return #2, which is the final scene of Act 2
  • Mounting Forces, which is the first scene of Act 3

This gives me a sense of how Act 2 could end and how Act 3 can begin. I’m not sure if I’ll keep these scenes as-is though. It’s an interesting place to take the story, but I’m not sure if these particular scenes will set the characters up for a strong enough ending.

Playing with the signpost scenes is like figuring out the spine of the story. I can see how it will be easier to fill in the remaining scenes once I figure these out. It’s basically the 80/20 rule applied to fiction writing. Figure out your 20% most important scenes, and write and arrange those first. Those are the scenes that provide 80% of the value.

Day 5

I’m at 8605 words total now. On this day I wrote the Lights Out scene, which is signpost scene #11 and the second scene of Act 3.

This is the dark, bleak, “all hope is lost” scene that sets things up for the finale.

It’s interesting that in many story structures, right after the lead character makes a big decision, you knock them down a notch in the next scene (or shortly thereafter). One reason for doing this is that it raises the stakes, showing just how big or risky the decision really is. This increases the tension and helps maintain good pacing. The “Lights Out” scene raises the stakes as high as they’ll go.

Isn’t real life like this too sometimes? You may make a big decision such as to quit your job or leave a relationship, and now you have an upcoming scene where you have to tell your boss or partner, and that’s often an unpleasant situation that knocks you back a bit. But then you can at least have some recovery scenes afterwards.

In fiction and in real life, courage is a big part of the journey. Without sufficient courage, you can’t make those big decisions, and the story can’t progress.

This was a hard scene to write, so it took me considerably longer to write than any other scene. I kept pausing and reflecting along the way on where to take it next, like after every few hundred words. There were a lot of options at each point.

This is also a very unusual Lights Out scene, not something I’ve seen elsewhere. While the idea of having a scene like this isn’t new, the way I’m approaching it isn’t familiar to me. It’s close to an addict hitting rock bottom, but it’s actually way worse than that. It’s like taking an addictive drug that’s also conscious, so it won’t let you quit even when you decide to.

I wonder if I overdid it though. I buried the main character so deeply in this scene that it looks totally impossible for her to escape her fate now. But that also makes it kinda interesting to see if I can use this. If I can’t see a way out, the reader may not be able to see any way out either.

The writing is feeling a little easier now that I’ve done five days of it. It’s still challenging though. If I didn’t have my daily quota of writing at least 1667 words each day, my word count would surely be lower at this point.

I feel like what I’m really doing this month is mapping out the story space. There are so many permutations and branches of the story I could write. Every writing session gives me more clarity about what I could do, but it won’t necessarily be what I end up going with.

I find the “words are cheap” mindset helpful. It’s not that difficult to throw a scene onto the screen and see how it turns up and then reflect upon how it fits with the other scenes. At this point I’m not worrying at all about polished language. I’m writing the scenes fairly plainly to explore more possibilities each day.

Share Button

Poor diet: Children 20cm shorter as a result, analysis says

A global analysis suggests that on average the world’s tallest teenagers live in the Netherlands.

Share Button

Covid: Can mass testing save us from another lockdown?

Cheap and rapid tests are now available, but what can they realistically achieve?

Share Button

Global-scale animal ecology reveals behavioral changes in response to climate change

Using a new large-scale data archive of animal movement studies, an international team including University of Maryland biologists found that animals are responding in unexpected ways to climate change. The archive contains data from studies across the global Arctic and sub-Arctic, an enormous region that is experiencing some of the most dramatic effects of global warming, including animal declines.

After developing the archive, the researchers used it to conduct three case studies that revealed surprising patterns and associations between climate change and the behavior of golden eagles, bears, caribou, moose and wolves. This work demonstrates both the feasibility and importance of studying animal ecology on extremely large scales. A research paper describing the archive and case studies appears in the November 6, 2020, issue of the journal Science.

“I’m really excited about how this work shows what you can learn from comparing data across populations on a very large scale,” said Elie Gurarie, an associate research scientist in UMD’s Department of Biology and a co-author of the paper. “I would say this is an early example of what we might call global animal movement ecology. We’re increasing our ability to monitor the pulse of animal populations across the Earth and ask big picture questions about what it means.”

Large-scale monitoring of things like sea-surface temperature and global forest cover have revealed important information about the response of Earth’s systems to climate change and human activity. But big-picture trends in animal behavior have been difficult to study, in part because animal ecology is not traditionally studied across landscapes that span entire regions of the globe, and also because the necessary data are collected by a variety of agencies and jurisdictions and are therefore neither standardized nor easily accessible.

To address these issues, Gurarie and his collaborators spent years building relationships with scientists from national, regional and First Nations governments and research groups throughout the Arctic to convey the benefits of sharing data in a global repository that they call the Arctic Animal Movement Archive (AAMA). Currently, the archive includes contributions from researchers from over 100 universities, government agencies and conservation groups across 17 countries.

The archive includes data from 201 terrestrial and marine animal tracking studies representing more than 8,000 animals between 1991 and the present. Using this data, Gurarie and members of his lab analyzed the movements of more than 900 female caribou from 2000 to 2017. They found that the iconic long-distance migrating caribou are giving birth earlier in the spring, roughly tracking rates of warming. But among the non-migratory mountain and lowland woodland caribou only the northern sub-populations are showing similar changes. While the drivers of these differences remain a mystery, understanding their behavior is critical to anticipating how they will respond as the Arctic continues to warm and many populations continue to decline.

“It’s tricky to predict how these trends might impact populations,” Gurarie said. “On the one hand, it can be better to give birth earlier, as it gives the calves more opportunity to grow during the summer season. On the other hand, giving birth too early may mean you literally don’t have time to reach the optimal calving grounds. The ability to look at biological processes, like birth, at such a large scale, across populations and subspecies and over millions of square kilometers, is unprecedented for a species in such a remote and harsh environment. These results reveal patterns that we would not have suspected, and point to further lines of inquiry about everything from caribou evolution to their ability to adapt to environmental changes moving forward.”

Data analysis tools Gurarie developed to study caribou were also used for another case study led by his collaborators.

In an analysis comparing movements of more than 100 golden eagles from 1993 to 2017, Scott LaPoint, a researcher from Columbia University who is now at Black Rock Forest Consortium, found that immature birds migrating north in the spring arrived earlier following mild winters, while adult birds did not. The timing shift for young birds varied in response to a large-scale climate cycle called the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, which is being affected by climate change. Such age-related behavior changes could only be seen through decades of movement data and may have implications for breeding success.

A third study by Peter Mahoney of the University of Washington looked at the movement speeds of bears, caribou, moose and wolves from 1998 to 2019. His study showed that species respond differently to seasonal temperatures and winter snow conditions. Those differences could influence species interactions, food competition and predator-prey dynamics.

The scientists expect that other researchers will continue to mine the AAMA for answers to pressing questions about whether and how animals are responding to a changing Arctic. Meanwhile, the resource continues to expand as more data comes in from currently tracked animals and more researchers add their studies.

“This work has given us a baseline to understand the large-scale picture so we can get a sense of how animals and environments are really interacting across species and across space as the environment changes,” Gurarie said.

Share Button

Earliest example of a rapid-fire tongue found in ‘weird and wonderful’ extinct amphibians

Fossils of bizarre, armored amphibians known as albanerpetontids provide the oldest evidence of a slingshot-style tongue, a new Science study shows.

Despite having lizardlike claws, scales and tails, albanerpetontids — mercifully called “albies” for short — were amphibians, not reptiles. Their lineage was distinct from today’s frogs, salamanders and caecilians and dates back at least 165 million years, dying out only about 2 million years ago.

Now, a set of 99-million-year-old fossils redefines these tiny animals as sit-and-wait predators that snatched prey with a projectile firing of their tongue — and not underground burrowers, as once thought. The fossils, one previously misidentified as an early chameleon, are the first albies discovered in modern-day Myanmar and the only known examples in amber.

They also represent a new genus and species: Yaksha perettii, named after treasure-guarding spirits known as yakshas in Hindu literature and Adolf Peretti, the discoverer of two of the fossils.

“This discovery adds a super-cool piece to the puzzle of this obscure group of weird little animals,” said study co-author Edward Stanley, director of the Florida Museum of Natural History’s Digital Discovery and Dissemination Laboratory. “Knowing they had this ballistic tongue gives us a whole new understanding of this entire lineage.”

A fortunate mistake

The discovery began with a bumble.

In 2016, Stanley and Juan Diego Daza, lead author of the Science study and assistant professor of biological sciences at Sam Houston State University, published a paper presenting a dozen rare amber fossil lizards — or so they thought. One juvenile specimen possessed a hodgepodge of bewildering characteristics, including a specialized tongue bone. After much debate and consultation with colleagues, the scientists finally labelled it an ancient chameleon, about 99 million years old, an estimate based on radiometric dating of crystals at the site where the fossil was found.

When she read the study, Susan Evans, professor of vertebrate morphology and paleontology at University College London and an albie expert, instantly recognized the puzzling specimen. It was no chameleon. She emailed Daza.

“I remember that as one of the worst days of my life,” he said.

But the paper also attracted the attention of an unexpected collaborator: Peretti, a gemologist who contacted Daza about another collection of amber fossil lizards from the same region of Myanmar. (Note: The mining and sale of Burmese amber are often entangled with human rights abuses. Peretti acquired the fossils legally from companies that follow a strict ethical code. More details appear in an ethics statement at the end of this story).

Per Daza’s recommendation, Peretti sent the collection to the University of Texas at Austin for CT scanning, a way of clarifying what lies inside. As Daza began cleaning up the scans, one fossil in particular caught his eye — the complete skull of an adult albie.

Most fossil albies are crushed flat or a jumble of bones in disarray. In 1995, Evans published the first description of a complete specimen, excavated in Spain, but “it was very much roadkill,” she said. Even amber fossils suffer degradation, and soft tissues can mineralize, becoming difficult to work with.

This specimen, however, was not only three-dimensional, “it was in mint condition,” Stanley said. “Everything was where it was supposed to be. There was even some soft tissue,” including the tongue pad and parts of the jaw muscles and eyelids.

It was also the adult counterpart to the juvenile albie that had been mistaken for a chameleon.

When Daza sent the scan to Evans, she was dazzled by its rich detail.

“All my Christmases have come at once!” she wrote back.

‘Weird and wonderful’

Once classified as salamanders, albies’ stippled, reinforced skulls led many scientists to hypothesize they were diggers. No one imagined them as having chameleonlike lifestyles, Stanley said. But, he added, “if you’re going to misidentify an albie as any kind of lizard, a chameleon is absolutely what you would land on.”

Even though one is an amphibian and the other a reptile, they share several features, including claws, scales, massive eye sockets and — we now know — a projectile feeding mechanism.

The chameleon tongue is one of the fastest muscles in the animal kingdom and can rocket from 0 to 60 mph in a hundredth of a second in some species. It gets its speed from a specialized accelerator muscle that stores energy by contracting and then launching the elastic tongue with a recoil effect. If the earliest albies also had ballistic tongues, the feature is much older than the first chameleons, which may have appeared 120 million years ago. Fossil evidence indicates albies are at least 165 million years old, though Evans said their lineage must be much more ancient, originating more than 250 million years ago.

While armed with a rapid-fire tongue, Y. perettii was tiny: Based on the fossil skull, Daza estimates the adult was about 2 inches long, not including the tail. The juvenile was a quarter that size.

“We envision this as a stocky little thing scampering in the leaf litter, well hidden, but occasionally coming out for a fly, throwing out its tongue and grabbing it,” Evans said.

The revelation that albies had projectile tongues helps explain some of their “weird and wonderful” features, such as unusual jaw and neck joints and large, forward-looking eyes, a common characteristic of predators, she said. They may also have breathed through their skin, as salamanders do.

Even though the specimens are remarkably preserved, Stanley said CT scanning was essential to the analysis, revealing fine-scale features obscured in the cloudy amber.

“They only come to life with CT scanning,” he said. “Digital technology is really key with this amber material.”

Digitization also enabled the researchers, scattered around the world and hunkered down during COVID-19 quarantines, to collaboratively analyze and describe the specimens — and then make the same material digitally available to others.

How are albanerpetontids related to other amphibians?

Despite the level of preservation and completeness of the Y. perettii specimens, albies’ exact place in the amphibian family tree remains a mystery. The researchers coded the specimens’ physical characteristics and ran them through four models of amphibian relationships with no clear results. The animals’ unusual combination of features is likely to blame, Evans said.

“In theory, albies could give us a clue as to what the ancestors of modern amphibians looked like,” she said. “Unfortunately, they’re so specialized and so weird in their own way that they’re not helping us all that much.”

But Y. perettii does put albies on a new part of the map. Northwest Myanmar was likely an island 99 million years ago and possibly a remnant from Gondwana, the ancient southern continental landmass. With two exceptions in Morocco, all other fossil albies have been found in North America, Europe and East Asia, which formerly formed a northern continental landmass. Daza said Y. perettii may have rafted to the island from mainland Asia or could represent a new southern record for the group.

We just missed them

With such a wide distribution, why did albies vanish into extinction while frogs, salamanders and caecilians still exist today?

We don’t know. Albies almost survived to the present, fading out about 2 million years ago, possibly late enough to have crossed paths with our earliest hominid relatives, Evans said.

“We only just missed them. I keep hoping they’re still alive somewhere.”

Share Button

COVID-19 is making tinnitus worse, new study finds

New research reveals that tinnitus, a common condition that causes the perception of noise in the ear and head, is being exacerbated by COVID-19 — as well as the measures helping to keep us safe.

The study of 3,103 people with tinnitus was led by Anglia Ruskin University (ARU), with support from the British Tinnitus Association and the American Tinnitus Association. The study involved participants from 48 countries, with the vast majority coming from the UK and the US.

Published in the journal Frontiers in Public Health, the research found that 40% of those displaying symptoms of COVID-19 simultaneously experience a worsening of their tinnitus.

Although the study focused on people with pre-existing tinnitus, a small number of participants also reported that their condition was initially triggered by developing COVID-19 symptoms, suggesting that tinnitus could be a ‘long COVID’ symptom in some cases.

Tinnitus affects an estimated one in eight adults in the UK and is associated with reduced emotional wellbeing, depression, and anxiety.

The new study also found that a large proportion of people believe their tinnitus is being made worse by social distancing measures introduced to help control the spread of the virus. These measures have led to significant changes to work and lifestyle routines.

UK respondents reported this to be a greater issue compared to people from other countries, with 46% of UK respondents saying that lifestyle changes had negatively impacted their tinnitus compared to 29% in North America.

Internal worries such as fear of catching COVID-19, financial concerns, loneliness and trouble sleeping have contributed to making tinnitus more bothersome for 32% of people overall, with external factors such as increased videocalls, noisier home environments, home schooling and increased coffee and alcohol consumption also cited by respondents. Females and the under-50s found tinnitus significantly more bothersome during the pandemic.

The study noted that as well as increasing the severity of tinnitus symptoms, the COVID-19 pandemic has also made it more difficult for people to access healthcare support for the condition. This could further increase emotional distress and worsen tinnitus symptoms, creating a vicious cycle. Before COVID-19, more than eight out of 10 UK patients were already unhappy with the treatment options available from their health professional.

Lead author Dr Eldre Beukes, a Research Fellow at Anglia Ruskin University (ARU) in Cambridge, England, and Lamar University in Texas, said: “The findings of this study highlight the complexities associated with experiencing tinnitus and how both internal factors, such as increased anxiety and feelings of loneliness, and external factors, such as changes to daily routines, can have a significant effect on the condition.

“Some of the changes brought about by COVID-19 appear to have had a negative impact on the lives of people with tinnitus and participants in this study reported that COVID-19 symptoms are worsening or, in some cases, even initiating tinnitus and hearing loss. This is something that needs to be closely examined by both clinical and support services.”

David Stockdale, Chief Executive of the British Tinnitus Association and a co-author of the study, said: “With the second wave of COVID-19 and the resulting national lockdown likely to increase feelings of stress and isolation, it’s vital that we don’t see the same mistakes as before when it comes to community health provision for people with tinnitus.

“Poor treatment of tinnitus in the early stages often leads to much worse cases and severe tinnitus can have a huge impact on mental health. With this in mind, as the COVID-19 second wave takes hold, the healthcare system needs to ensure that anyone who develops tinnitus or experiences a worsening of their condition can access the professional healthcare support they need as quickly as possible.”

Share Button

Covid: Regulator criticises data used to justify lockdown

Government used out-of-date model predicting 4,000 deaths a day in TV briefing.

Share Button

Health24.com | OPINION | It’s okay not to be okay

  • Before Covid-19, one in three South Africans presented with a psychological disorder during their lifetime
  • Adding to the problem, the pandemic has caused a significant rise in depression, anxiety and trauma symptoms
  • One of the most insidious barriers to seeking treatment is, however, the silence surrounding mental health 

As a mental healthcare provider, I approach the end of every year with some trepidation. As soon as the August winds start to blow in Bloemfontein, we tend to see a distinct increase in our community’s psychological distress. The year 2020 has not spared us this increased burden of suffering.

This year has presented humanity with extreme challenges and our university community has felt this to our core. The latest research indicates that the South African population has been affected by the pandemic in various ways and on various levels but none less severe than our psychological health.

One in three South Africans will present with a psychological disorder during their lifetime (and this was prior to the Covid-19 outbreak), and the effects of the pandemic have caused a significant rise in depression, anxiety and trauma symptoms among South Africans.

In mourning 

We are experiencing exceptionally high levels of financial stress due to the impact of the disease and lockdown on our economy. We have endured months of social distancing, fears surrounding our own health and the well-being of our loved ones, our financial safety, managing our children’s home-schooling, adapting to distance-learning and concerns about the academic year being salvaged.

We have had to experience loss after loss. We mourn loved ones, colleagues and acquaintances that have become ill or passed away due to the pandemic. We have mourned the loss of our normal lives. The hugs, handshakes, casually touching someone’s arm, the shows, sporting events, weddings, graduations and braais we took as for granted.

We grieve for a time before sanitising and masks and avoiding contact with our fellow humans were the daily norm. We miss our offices and tearoom banter. We miss being with our students. Amid all of these losses, we know that our rates of gender-based violence, suicide and substance abuse have increased. When people are forced to spend time with others in confined spaces amid increasing financial, health and social stressors, frustration and fear may lead to damaging reactions and dysfunctional coping mechanisms. 

World Mental Health Awareness Day on 10 October could not have arrived at a better time. This year the World Health Organization is encouraging investment into mental healthcare across the globe. While this is an essential step in increasing access to mental healthcare services, it is also only one aspect in the use of psychological treatment resources.

One of our most important barriers to providing mental healthcare often lies within us. Mental illness remains one of the most stigmatised conditions in society, even though each one of us will be affected by our own or our loved ones’ mental-health problems at some point during our lives. Some of the common problematic and erroneous beliefs society holds about people who struggle with mental illness is that they are somehow deviant, dangerous, weak or even faking it.

Unfortunately, our healthcare workers are not immune to such prejudicial attitudes and neither are their patients. Self-stigmatisation occurs when we internalise these discriminatory generalisations and fail to access mental healthcare because we believe that we should be stronger, or just pull ourselves together or worry about the impact of receiving a psychiatric diagnosis on our career or our relationships. 

Silence one of the most insidious barriers 

We fear being judged by our healthcare providers, our employers, colleagues, family and friends. This culminates in a situation where we lead lives of quiet desperation – numbing our distress with distractions and substances and perhaps even work. The silence surrounding mental health is one of the most insidious barriers to accessing treatment – because you cannot be helped if nobody knows you are suffering.

This is the tragedy of suicide, which more frequently than we wish to believe, is the final symptom of depression and severe psychological illness. I have had to assist more patients than I care to recall to work through the trauma and grief of losing a loved one to suicide.

Perhaps one of the most tragic aspects of this is that almost all would sit in utter shock recalling how their loved one had seemed fine. How this came out of the blue. How he or she had never told anyone how difficult life had become for them. How hard it was to get out of bed each morning. How much energy it took to go through the motions of a normal day. How ultimately they were so ill that they believed that they were a burden to their family and friends. How they could see no hope of relief from their pain other than to end their lives. And nobody knew. They were silent in their suffering because of fear of stigma, judgement, rejection or being viewed as a burden. 

The surprising gift of the pandemic

Mental illness does not discriminate against anyone. It affects professors, students, support staff and the greater university community equally. Nobody is spared these struggles. This is what we all share, the human experience of life’s seasons which we cannot do alone. When we need the help of more than our resilience, support structure and exercise routine.

This is where the pandemic has brought some unexpected gifts. Prior to March of this year, it was very unusual for psychologists to provide online or telephonic therapy. In fact, many medical aids were uncomfortable covering teletherapy. Once we had no other alternative, however, we all had to adapt. Suddenly I no longer only saw patients who were able to attend sessions at my office. Now I could assist students and doctors who were in lockdown across the country. I could refer patients to the appropriate therapist, irrespective of where they were.

Patients no longer had to negotiate the uncomfortable experience of waiting in a psychologist’s waiting room or being seen leaving an office looking upset or need to take time off work to attend a session. Now patients can access their psychotherapist from the containment and confidentiality of their own space, and we, in turn, are more freely available as we are not bound to a specific venue. 

Receiving psychological treatment is becoming as normal a part of well-being as going for a run, or eating healthily or spending time with our social support system. And this is what is going to save lives. The more we normalise the use of psychological services, the less stigma and silencing we will be subjected to.

We survived a pandemic 

As a clinical psychologist, I proudly tell my students, colleagues and patients that I have my own psychotherapist without whom I would not be the therapist, colleague, friend and mom I am. There is no shame in owning our vulnerability and reaching out for assistance in order to make meaningful and even enjoyable the few journeys around the sun that we have left.

So this October of 2020 should be the month when we start the conversation about our mental health. And by doing, so we permit those around us to do the same. We have survived a pandemic that changed the world and our daily lives. It’s okay not to be okay.   

*Angie Vorster is a Clinical Psychologist at the School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Free State.

Image credit: Getty Images

Share Button

Covid-19: Assisted dying travel allowed during lockdown, says Hancock

The health secretary says those seeking assisted deaths abroad will not be breaking new Covid rules.

Share Button

Coronavirus: Was tier 3 working in Liverpool City Region?

Did three weeks of the highest tier of Covid-19 restrictions make a difference in Liverpool City Region?

Share Button