• Asthma has not proven to be one of the top comorbid diseases for worse Covid-19 outcomes
• Researchers have speculated that people with allergy-driven asthma might even have some protection against Covid-19
• They, however, found that non-allergic asthma increases the risk of severe Covid-19 by up to 48%

Everyone agrees about the good news – people whose asthma is spurred on by allergies don’t appear to have an increased risk of life-threatening illness if they contract Covid-19.

“Asthma has not risen as one of the top comorbid diseases for worse Covid-19 outcomes,” said Dr Sandhya Khurana, director of the Mary Parkes Center for Asthma, Allergy and Pulmonary Care at the University of Rochester (New York) Medical Center. “We always worry with asthma and viral infections, because they seem to trigger asthma exacerbation unreasonably. But what we’ve seen so far is reassuring.”

But debate continues to swirl regarding the potential severity of Covid infection in people with non-allergic asthma.

Non-allergic asthma

Some studies have suggested that people who have asthma caused by something other than allergies – exercise, stress, air pollution, weather conditions – might have an increased risk of severe Covid-19.

For example, Harvard researchers found that having non-allergic asthma increased the risk of severe Covid-19 by as much as 48%. That conclusion was based on data from 65 000 asthma sufferers presented in the June issue of the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

“For those people, I think being more cautious would be good for them,” said senior researcher Liming Liang, an associate professor of statistical genetics at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston. “I think the next wave is coming. We’ve got to be more cautious.”

But other experts note that the data involving Covid and non-allergic asthma sufferers is very limited, and any conclusions that these people are at higher risk of severe infection could be flawed.

Their asthma could be caused by other lung ailments that are associated with more serious cases of Covid, for instance, said Dr Mitchell Grayson, chief of allergy and immunology at Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus, Ohio.

A reasonable suspicion

“There have been several studies that have shown that COPD does increase your risk of more severe disease,” he said. “I don’t think these studies have done a good job of excluding COPD in these patients.”

Grayson agrees with Khurana that in the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic, there was much concern that asthma could be a risk factor – a reasonable suspicion, given that the coronavirus attacks the lungs.

But everything that came out of the initial epidemic in China suggested that asthma was not a risk factor for life-threatening Covid, Grayson said, and the data continued to confirm that as the coronavirus spread across the globe.

“It’s not there in the data. If it is there, it’s an extremely small risk. It’s nothing I can see,” he said.

Researchers have speculated that people with allergy-driven asthma might have some protection against Covid, due to the way the coronavirus infects the body.

The SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes Covid-19 enters lung cells by engaging with a type of protein on their surface called an ACE2 receptor, Khurana said.

Not as many ACE2 receptors

“In the setting of an allergic type of inflammation, the expression of the ACE2 receptor appears to be downregulated. It appears to be lower. There’s not as much receptor,” she said.

Because there aren’t as many ACE2 receptors available, people with allergic asthma might not be as vulnerable to severe infection, Khurana said. This theory also could help explain why other chronic diseases appear to increase Covid risk, she added.

“Patients in conditions like diabetes or hypertension, this receptor expression is increased,” Khurana said. “That’s a possible reason why those comorbid diseases are at especially high risk for this infection.”

But that only explains why allergic asthma isn’t a major risk factor for severe Covid, Grayson said. It doesn’t explain why some studies are finding increased risk among people with non-allergic asthma.

Grayson suspects that the purported link between non-allergic asthma and Covid found in these studies is actually a link between a Covid and a host of different lung ailments, especially COPD.

Scratching the surface

“There are studies showing that COPD increases your risk of more severe Covid, not markedly but a little bit, not to the extent of things like hypertension and diabetes and [being] elderly,” he said. “I’m concerned that what they’re calling non-allergic asthma actually is COPD, which would skew their data.”

In Khurana’s view, more study is needed, particularly prospective studies that track people with different types of asthma prior to Covid infection.

“So far, we just don’t know enough to make any conclusions. I think we’re still scratching the surface here and still have a lot to learn,” she said.

In the meantime, it would pay for everyone to protect themselves, Khurana added.

“It’s good practice to observe the recommended guidance on hand hygiene and physical distancing and masking and avoiding any situation where you could be exposed, even though it’s obviously welcome to see that allergic asthma is not as high-risk as some of the other comorbid diseases,” Khurana said.

^{Image credit: Getty Images}

• British researchers monitored infants’ brain activity while they had a painful heel lance to draw blood 
• It was not possible to determine if infants that were held skin-to-skin by a parent felt less pain
• Brain activity was, however, different in the infants that had skin-to-skin contact

Infants may feel less pain when held by a parent with skin-to-skin contact, a new UK study suggests.

“We have found when a baby is held by their parent with skin-on-skin contact, the higher-level brain processing in response to pain is somewhat dampened. The baby’s brain is also using a different pathway to process its response to pain,” said study co-author Lorenzo Fabrizi. He’s with University College London in the department of neuroscience, physiology and pharmacology.

“While we cannot confirm whether the baby actually feels less pain, our findings reinforce the important role of touch between parents and their newborn babies,” Fabrizi said in a college news release.

Painful heel lance

The study included 27 infants, up to about three months old, who were born premature or at term at UCL Hospitals in Britain.

The researchers monitored the infants’ brain activity while they had a painful heel lance to draw blood for testing.

During the procedure, the infants were either held by their mother skin-to-skin; held by their mother with clothing, or lying in a crib or incubator (most of those infants were swaddled).

The infants’ initial brain response to the pain of the heel lance was the same. But as it triggered four to five waves of brain activity, the later waves of brain activity were lower among those babies who were held skin-to-skin.

The dampening of the delayed response to pain in the infants who had skin contact with their mothers “suggests that parental touch impacts the brain’s higher-level processing. The pain might be the same, but how the baby’s brain processes and reacts to that pain depends on their contact with a parent,” said study co-author and pain researcher Rebecca Pillai Riddell.

“Our findings support the notion that holding a newborn baby against your skin is important to their development,” added Pillai Riddell, a professor in the department of psychology at York University in Toronto.

^{Image credit: Getty}

Stricter rules to start on Thursday will need to bring the R rate “below 1”, the cabinet minister says.

Families foot the bill as the NHS “refuses” to prescribe medical cannabis for children with epilepsy.

Lockdown is the measure nobody wanted but now many European countries have decided they need.

Boris Johnson says the country must act to prevent a “medical and moral disaster” for the NHS.

• It has been suggested that babies of Covid-19-infected mothers be separated from their mothers
• It may, however, not be necessary as pregnant mothers with Covid-19 tend not to infect their babies
• A new study, therefore, recommends normal breastfeeding, while taking a few extra precautions 

In some reassuring news on the front, a new study finds that pregnant women with Covid-19 rarely infect their newborn.

That finding suggests that it may not be necessary to separate infected mothers from their infants and that moms can continue to breastfeed, the researchers added.

“Our findings should reassure expectant mothers with Covid-19 that basic infection-control measures during and after childbirth, such as wearing a mask and engaging in breast and hand hygiene when holding or breastfeeding a baby, protected newborns from infection in this series,” said researcher Dr Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman. She’s a professor of women’s health in obstetrics and gynaecology at Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, in New York City.

A few extra precautions

For the study, the team looked at 101 newborns born to Covid-19-positive mothers from 13 March to 24 April, 2020.

Hospital personnel maintained basic precautions to prevent infection and kept infants in protective cribs six-feet away from the mothers’ beds. Direct breastfeeding and skin-to-skin contact with babies, however, were encouraged, as long as moms wore masks and washed hands and breasts with soap and water.

“During the pandemic, we continued to do what we normally do to promote bonding and development in healthy newborns, while taking a few extra precautions to minimise the risk of exposure to the virus,” Gyamfi-Bannerman said.

Among the infants, only two tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and they had no symptoms. The researchers couldn’t be sure how the babies became infected.

Conflicting recommendations

Several groups have recommended that babies of Covid-19-infected mothers should be separated from their mothers, the study authors noted in a university news release.

“These recommendations were made in the absence of data on rates of mother-to-newborn SARS-CoV-2 transmission and are based on experience with mother-newborn transmission of other infectious diseases,” explained researcher Dr Dani Dumitriu, an assistant professor of paediatrics in psychiatry at Columbia.

“But some of the recommendations conflict with what we know about the developmental benefits of early breastfeeding and skin-to-skin contact,” Dumitriu added. “Our study shows that these measures may not be necessary for healthy newborns with Covid-positive moms.”

The findings were published online on 12 October in JAMA Pediatrics.

^{Image credit: Getty Images}

Christmas? Spring? A return to life as we knew it could be quite a long way off.