
Keir Starmer has promised to send British troops into Ukraine in the event of a peace deal with Russia – but what does that really mean?
The prime minister proudly revealed on Tuesday that he and the French president Emmanuel Macron had signed a written agreement with Ukraine to deploy their own soldiers to the war-torn country, in a bid to help protect it if a peace agreement is reached.
Advertisement
The pledge appeared to encourage the US to finally offer its own military efforts to help “deter” any future aggression against Ukraine and defend against any other attacks.
While these are all promising words, what does this mean in practice?
What did Starmer and Macron say?
The two world leaders signed a “declaration of intent” at a Coalition of the Willing meeting on Tuesday, promising to send troops in the event of a peace deal.
Starmer said it “paves the way for legal framework under which British, French and partner forces could operate on Ukrainian soil”.
Advertisement
He said: “Following a ceasefire, the UK and France will establish military hubs across Ukraine and build protected facilities for weapons of military equipment to support Ukraine’s defensive needs.”
Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy welcomed it as a “huge step forward”.
The wider Coalition of the Willing – a group of more than 30 nations dedicated to supporting Ukraine in the face of Russia’s aggression – also committed to a “multinational force for Ukraine” from willing nations.
This would support deterrence and rebuilding Ukraine’s armed forces during a ceasefire.
Could a deployment happen any time soon?
That all depends on the progress of a peace deal – and if US security promises hold.
Putin is yet to respond to the these developments, and he could easily dismiss any peace deal which involves European troops moving into Ukraine.
Advertisement
That would slow down the grinding progress the US team has been make with its 20-point plan to end the conflict.
But it seems pretty unlikely any deal is going to get over the line any time soon.
Putin has been dragging his feet over any kind of compromise for months and sticking to his maximalist goals in Ukraine.
He rejected Western proposals for a “reassurance force” in Ukraine back in September, warning any troops deployed to Ukraine would be “legitimate targets”.
Advertisement
Will there be a Commons vote on potential deployment?
Starmer opened prime minister’s questions on Wednesday by reassuring MPs the matter would put to the Commons before any troops are deployed to Ukraine.
MPs could, of course, vote against such a move, considering the UK’s economy is already struggling and its military is pretty depleted.
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has already made it clear he would vote against such a motion.
He told Times Radio: “I would vote against. We neither have the manpower nor the equipment to go into an operation which clearly has no end in timeline.”
Advertisement
No.10 was also unable to tell reporters what would happen if MPs failed to vote in favour of deploying troops.
Neither the prime minister’s press secretary nor his official spokesperson said if the government would be bound by a similar vote by MPs.
This happened before, such as when David Cameron lost a vote on military action in Syria in August 2013.
Advertisement
Starmer’s spokesperson said: “I think the point is, until we’ve secured the cessation of hostilities, our planning teams are focused on ensuring the coalition of the willing is able to flex to the requirements of any peace deal and ensure Ukraine’s armed forces are able to regenerate, to defend Ukraine, and support European security for generations to come.
“So it is a staged process.”
What else do we know about this plan?
The government has revealed very few details and is yet to give a statement to the Commons on the process.
Starmer’s press secretary insisted ministers will speak to the House at the “earliest opportunity” and updated MPs on Starmer’s part in the peacekeeping talks in Paris.
Advertisement
But it remains unclear how many troops would be provided, if the UK would match the same number as France, if other European states might get involved and what those soldiers would actually do when on the ground.




















