CAR-T cell cancer immunotherapy gets personal

New adoptive T cell therapies — in which T cells, the immune system’s natural hunters patrolling the body for foreign adversaries, are retrieved from cancer-riddled patients, super-charged and amplified outside the body, and then infused back into the same patient — are changing the prospects of cancer patients. Since 2017, when CAR (chimeric antigen receptor)-T cells were green-lighted as the first modified therapeutic cells by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) to treat leukemia, five similar products have since been approved and more than 20,000 people have been treated with this game-changing immunotherapy.

CAR-T cells are engineered to carry synthetic membrane-spanning receptor molecules that use their outside-facing portion to bind to antigens on cancer cells, which their inside-facing portion responds to by switching on a powerful tumor cell-destroying program. However, not all patients respond equally well to CAR-T cell therapies, and cancer immunologists have been trying to figure out what makes them work well or fail. Despite a budding understanding of differences between cancer patients’ T cells and healthy individuals’ T cells, these insights have not been taken into account in CAR-T cell manufacturing processes. All processes use a similar type of stimulation with T-cell specific agonists and general immune-stimulating cytokines to create infusible CAR-T cell products, irrespective of variations in the original T cells’ phenotype.

Now, a collaboration between bioengineers at the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University and Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) led by David Mooney, Ph.D. and cancer-immunologists at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) led by Catherine Wu, M.D., Ph.D. has demonstrated that personalizing CAR-T cell stimulation during manufacturing can significantly enhance the consistency and potency of the resulting CAR-T cell products. By using artificial antigen-presenting cell mimicking scaffolds (APC-ms), the team was able to fine-tune the levels of T cell stimulation to match the phenotype of T cells obtained from leukemia patients, and significantly enhanced their ex vivo and in vivo tumor-clearing abilities. The findings are published in Nature Communications.

“We show that CAR-T cell products made from T cells derived from cancer patients are generally less functional than CAR-T cells products derived from healthy individuals,” said Founding Wyss Core Faculty member Mooney. “Matching the CAR-T cell antigen-stimulation dose to the phenotype of patients’ T cells using a precisely controllable biomaterials approach that closely mimics natural antigen presentation can significantly improve their function. This approach could further personalize CAR-T cell therapy and remove an existing inadequacy from current T cell manufacturing.” Mooney also is Robert P. Pinkas Family Professor of Bioengineering at SEAS, and a lead of the NIH-funded Immunomaterials to Improve Immunotherapy (i3) Center coordinated at the Wyss Institute. This project was conceived at the Center, and Wu is one of its Principal Investigators.

Cutting the keys for personalized CAR-T therapies

The team investigated the phenotypes of T cells that they isolated from samples obtained from patients suffering from acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and chronic lymphoblastic leukemia (CLL), as well as from healthy donors. Next, they utilized APC-ms to provide the T cells with different doses of anti-CD3/anti-CD28 antigen stimulation and thus created a CAR-T cell library. All CAR-T cell products contained in the library were then probed again for functional differences, including their ability to kill cancer cells in vitro. The researchers directly compared their approach with one that is commonly used in CAR-T cell manufacturing, which presents the same antigens on rigid magnetic beads (Dynabeads) to T cells.

A key finding was that cancer patients’ T cells were much more easily over-stimulated at antigen doses commonly used during CAR-T cell manufacturing than “healthy” T cells. This made them lose their functionality, or become more “exhausted” as immunologists say, and decreased their ability to proliferate. CAR-T cells not only need to be transformed into a functional state but also amplified by millions to be able to eliminate tumor cells and metastasis in the entire body.

“By exploring a precise, narrow range of stimulation doses made possible with APC-ms, we show that there is something like a personalized ‘sweet spot’ for patient-derived T cells that maximizes functionality and amplification, which is, on average, lower than the usual doses,” said first-author David Zhang, who is a graduate student on Mooney’s team. “The APC-ms approach functions much more naturally than Dynabeads, because highly controllable levels of T-cell signals are embedded into a lipid bilayer, which allows the CAR-T cells to push and pull at them as just as T cells usually do across the ‘immunological synapse’ between them and antigen-presenting cells when T cell stimulation is at its best.”

From in vitro studies to cell manufacturing

While the team did not observe any significant differences between CAR-T cells created from ALL and CLL patient samples, overall their approach generated more cells with high cytotoxic potential toward tumor cells, a more balanced ratio between cytotoxic CD8+ T cells and CD4+ T cells that support their function, and more memory T cells that themselves are not cytotoxic but can be activated in later responses. In a mouse in vivo study, infused CAR-T cell products created with different levels of stimulation also exhibited significantly different abilities to control CD19-expressing Burkitt’s lymphoma, with cells again stimulated at lower than usual levels during manufacturing showing the strongest potential.

“We constructed a proof-of-concept model that is based on the quantifiable relationship between the phenotype of a T cell blood sample and its CAR-T cell products, and that outputs an optimal T cell stimulation dose for personalized CAR-T cell production,” said Wu. “Given that T cell samples are always fingerprinted for important markers at the beginning of the cell manufacturing process, similar strategies could be devised to further personalize the therapy using the APC-ms approach.” Wu is the Lavine Family Chair, Preventative Cancer Therapies at DFCI, and Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School.

“Dave Mooney’s team in the Wyss’ Immunomaterials platform is pushing the envelope of CAR-T cell and other immunotherapies using entirely new engineering and materials-based approaches. Hopefully, this will eventually enable us to also mobilize the immune system against recalcitrant solid tumors for which no therapies exist yet. It’s also a great example of where less is more,” said Wyss Founding Director Donald Ingber, M.D., Ph.D., who is also the Judah Folkman Professor of Vascular Biology at HMS and Boston Children’s Hospital, and Hansjörg Wyss Professor of Bioinspired Engineering at the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences.

Additional authors on the study are Wyss and SEAS researchers Kwasi Adu-Berchie, Siddharth Iyer, Yutong Liu, and Joshua Brockman; DFCI researcher Nicoletta Cieri, and Donna Neuberg, Sc.D., a data scientist at the DFCI and member of the i3 Center. The study was funded by the Wyss Institute at Harvard University, the Food and Drug Administration (under award #5R01FD006589), the National Cancer Institute of the NIH (under award #U54CA244726), as well as a fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Share Button

AstraZeneca: Jeremy Hunt ‘disappointed’ by drugs firm’s low-tax move

AstraZenaca chose Republic of Ireland for £320m factory because of the UK’s “discouraging” tax rate.

Share Button

Bridgend: Surgery changes could halve waiting times

Tweaks to hip and knee surgeries could allow more patients to be sent home on the same day.

Share Button

Overcoming Mental Blocks

Recently I’ve been pondering how our mind’s expectations often block us from experiencing more richness and possibility. Even when we set goals and invite new desires, we can easily stop ourselves from taking accessible actions to advance. This month I ran into my own personal example of this phenomenon.

One aspirational goal that I set months ago was to eventually do an hour-long group training session at my gym called UltraFit. That class looked intimidating from the online videos I’d seen of it. You can see the description on the UltraFit web page if you’re curious, with lines like “Our most intense workout yet. Get ready to challenge your mental and physical limits.”

Here’s a 2-minute video preview of UltraFit:

The video includes such inviting phrases as:

  • “We created UltraFit to serve our high-intensity fitness fanatics.”
  • “UltraFit is advanced. It is no joke.”
  • “helps our competitive athletes stay in peak physical condition”
  • “We help them get through the hard work, the type of training that people don’t want to do on their own.”

Am I competitive athlete? No. But I loved the idea of building up enough fitness to handle this class – eventually. 😅

I’ve been doing GTX group training sessions with a few different trainers at this gym since Summer 2022, with some breaks for injury, illness, and travel. GTX stands for Group Training eXperience. Doing a 6am workout with other early risers who are into fitness is such a beautiful way to get my day started. I love the social aspect of working out with trainers and trainees in small groups.

GTX can be challenging, especially the Zone 4 sessions (higher heart rate exercises). UltraFit seemed pretty next-level relative to the GTX sessions though.

After some remodeling that our gym did in December, the UltraFit class which used to be on the third floor was moved down to the second floor – the floor where I normally do GTX sessions and also train on my own. Now the GTX and UltraFit sessions both use the same training area in the center of the second floor, so it’s much easier to observe.

Last Thursday morning when I was starting a cardio session on my own, I noticed that an UltraFit session was going to begin soon. I hopped on a treadmill close enough to observe. It seemed like a great opportunity to at least watch part of it, so I could form a clearer vision of what I might eventually build towards.

I was captivated from the start and ended up staying on that treadmill for 92 minutes, so I could watch the whole hour-long session. There were around seven people doing the training together.

I was using my Beats Fit Pro headphones to listen to an audiobook, but instead of only using noise cancelling mode, I sometimes switched to transparency mode. Transparency mode acts like a hearing aid, so it amplifies nearby sounds. This let me hear the trainer’s words more clearly, which gave me more insights into the training session.

By the end of it, I was thinking, that actually looks doable. I could surely do the first 45 minutes at least. The last 15 minutes looked tough, but I felt I could handle that too, although it was sure to get my heart rate pretty high. It wasn’t as intimidating in-person as it looked from the video, and the people actually doing the training didn’t look like the super fit athletes in the video either. They were generally fit, but not THAT fit.

I recognized a few of my fellow GTX trainees in UltraFit too, and I thought that if they could do it, so could I.

So I boldly signed up for the following week’s class. After I described what I saw and encouraged her to join me, Rachelle opted to try it with me too. We normally do the GTX sessions together – often enough that if we don’t show up together, the trainer will invariably ask us where the other one is.

We went to our first UltraFit session this morning at 6am.

The format was similar to the session I observed in its overall structure but with different exercises. It was challenging but doable, just as I thought. I couldn’t do all the moves perfectly – far from it – but I did my best. My heart rate peaked at 185 bpm, which is about as high as I’m physically capable of, so it really did push me to my limit in that regard.

In terms of intensity, it’s probably comparable to a Zone 4 GTX workout, which we just did yesterday. But whereas GTX has a more even, wave-like distribution of intensity, UltraFit starts fairly out mild and gradually builds to a peak of intensity over the course of the hour.

Each time we’d get on the treadmill, we’d sprint faster than before but for shorter durations, with sprinting rounds being 2 minutes, then 1 minute, then 45 seconds, 30 seconds, and the last couple of rounds being 15 seconds all out.

The hardest part was returning to the floor to do more high intensity exercises while still trying to catch my breath after sprinting fast at the end. The class had this flow of building up fatigue with round after round of sprinting and core exercises, and then you have to do more physical challenges while you’re already tired, and near the end, also breathless.

I liked the experience, which gave me a delightful sense of accomplishment afterwards, and Rachelle and I chatted with the instructor for a while afterwards. I’m sure I’ll do it again, maybe even next week. I like how it challenges me in different ways than the GTX sessions.

I wasn’t thinking that I’d accomplish my stretch goal of successfully completing an UltraFit class this soon. I figured it was still many months away. I’m glad I got the chance to visually audit the class first, which helped me picture myself just going for it.

This was a good reminder that our limits tend to be more mental than physical or financial. It’s amazing how our expectations can block us from opportunities and experiences that are more accessible than we realize.

What got me around that block in this case was exercising my curiosity to watch a class without having to commit to it. I leaned in to probe the goal a bit more, and that helped to crack my self-limiting thoughts about it.

That said, I might be pretty sore tomorrow unless my mind can find a way around that expectation too. 😉

The invitation for you is to consider how you might be blocking a seemingly distant stretch goal or desire due to your expectations regarding how you think it’s likely to show up. Are you piling on unnecessary prerequisites? How could you lean in with some noncommittal curiosity?

These expectation traps can be hard to spot within ourselves. One way to spot them is to ask where you wouldn’t feel that you belong. What experiences are other people having that you don’t feel ready for yet?

I had previously felt that I had to do a lot more training to earn the right to claim a spot in an UltraFit session. If I showed up before then, I’d surely be an impostor, right? I imagined a group of people like the ones in the video taking one look at me and saying, “Are you lost?” And that turned out to be pure fiction.

This morning I replaced the old frame with a new frame based on actual truth, including a fabulous UltraFit trainer named Gina encouraging Rachelle and me to come back for more. That feels like a lovely little graduation to have gone through – not physically as I had assumed would be necessary, but mentally and emotionally in terms of giving myself permission to access new experiences that were genuinely accessible.

I really think that LifeTime Athletic ought to consider replacing that video though. 🤣

Share Button

Strikes Update: How Friday 10 February’s walkouts will affect you

What you need to know about the ambulance workers’ strike and other industrial action, by the BBC’s Zoe Conway.

Share Button

Compact, non-mechanical 3D lidar system could make autonomous driving safer

Our roads might one day be safer thanks to a completely new type of system that overcomes some of lidar’s limitations. Lidar, which uses pulsed lasers to map objects and scenes, helps autonomous robots, vehicles and drones to navigate their environment. The new system represents the first time that the capabilities of conventional beam-scanning lidar systems have been combined with those of a newer 3D approach known as flash lidar.

In Optica, Optica Publishing Group’s journal for high-impact research, investigators led by Susumu Noda from Kyoto University in Japan describe their new nonmechanical 3D lidar system, which fits in the palm of the hand. They also show that it can be used to measure the distance of poorly reflective objects and automatically track the motion of these objects.

“With our lidar system, robots and vehicles will be able to reliably and safely navigate dynamic environments without losing sight of poorly reflective objects such as black metallic cars,” said Noda. “Incorporating this technology into cars, for example, would make autonomous driving safer.”

The new system is possible thanks to a unique light source the researchers developed called a dually modulated photonic-crystal laser (DM-PCSEL). Because this light source is chip-based it could eventually enable the development of an on-chip all-solid-state 3D lidar system.

“The DM-PCSEL integrates non-mechanical, electronically controlled beam scanning with flash illumination used in flash lidar to acquire a full 3D image with a single flash of light,” said Noda. “This unique source allows us to achieve both flash and scanning illumination without any moving parts or bulky external optical elements, such as lenses and diffractive optical elements.”

Combining scanning and flash illumination

Lidar systems map objects within view by illuminating those objects with laser beams and then calculating the distance of those objects by measuring the beams’ time of flight (ToF) — the time it takes for the light to travel to objects, be reflected and then return to the system. Most lidar systems in use and under development rely on moving parts such as motors to scan the laser beam, making these systems bulky, expensive and unreliable.

One non-mechanical approach, known as flash lidar, simultaneously illuminates and evaluates the distances of all objects in the field of view with a single broad, diffuse beam of light. However, flash lidar systems can’t be used to measure the distances of poorly reflective objects like black metallic cars due to the very small amount of light reflected from these objects. These systems also tend to be large because of the external lenses and optical elements needed to create the flash beam.

To address these critical limitations, the researchers developed the DM-PCSEL light source. It has both a flash source that can illuminate a wide 30°×30° field of view and a beam-scanning source that provides spot illumination with 100 narrow laser beams.

They incorporated the DM-PCSEL into a 3D lidar system, which allowed them to measure the distances of many objects simultaneously using wide flash illumination while also selectively illuminating poorly reflective objects with a more concentrated beam of light. The researchers also installed a ToF camera to perform distance measurements and developed software that enables automatic tracking of the motion of poorly reflective objects using beam-scanning illumination.

Measuring objects with varying reflectivity

“Our DM-PCSEL-based 3D lidar system lets us range highly reflective and poorly reflective objects simultaneously,” said Noda. “The lasers, ToF camera and all associated components required to operate the system were assembled in a compact manner, resulting in a total system footprint that is smaller than a business card.”

The researchers demonstrated the new lidar system by using it to measure the distances of poorly reflective objects placed on a table in a lab. They also showed that the system can automatically recognize poorly reflective objects and track their movement using selective illumination.

The researchers are now working to demonstrate the system in practical applications, such as the autonomous movement of robots and vehicles. They also want to see if replacing the ToF camera with a more optically sensitive single-photon avalanche photodiode array would allow the measurement of objects across even longer distances.

Share Button

Researchers link 27 genetic variants to ADHD

Why do some people get ADHD, while others do not? And how early in life or in the womb is the seed of ADHD sown?

Researchers from Aarhus University have come closer to answering this question in a large study, which has just been published in the journal Nature Genetics.

Together with national and international partners, the researchers have studied more than six million genetic variants in 38,691 people with ADHD and 186,843 people without ADHD. By this means it has been possible to identify 27 genetic risk variants for the common neurodevelopmental disorder.

Risk genes are expressed in the brain and neurons

The study is ground-breaking, inter alia because it finds more than twice as many risk variants as previous studies have identified.

The term “genetic variants” means specific variations in the DNA code — in this case, variants which are observed more frequently in people with ADHD than in people without the diagnosis. Variants in DNA affect, for example, the degree to which a gene is expressed and subsequently the amount of protein that is encoded by the gene.

By linking the genetic variants — i.e. the variations in DNA — to specific genes, the researchers have gained new knowledge about which tissues and cell types are particularly affected in individuals with ADHD. The study is based on data from the Danish iPSYCH cohort, deCODE Genetics in Iceland and the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium.

Subsequently, the researchers combined the results with existing data on gene expression in different tissues, cell types and brain development stages, and they discovered that genes involved in ADHD have a particularly high level of expression in a wide range of brain tissues and early in brain development — in fact already at the embryonic stage.

“This emphasises that ADHD should be seen as a brain developmental disorder, and that this is most likely influenced by genes that have a major impact on the brain’s early development,” says Professor Ditte Demontis of the Department of Biomedicine at Aarhus University, who is first author of the study.

In addition, the researchers found that the genetics that increase the risk of ADHD particularly affect genes that are expressed in neurons, especially dopaminergic neurons.

“This is interesting because dopamine plays a role in relation to the reward response in the brain, and because a frequently used form of ADHD medicine works by increasing the concentration of dopamine in different brain regions. Our results indicate that the imbalance in dopamine in the brains of people with ADHD is partly attributable to genetic risk factors,” says Ditte Demontis.

Associated with reduced concentration capacity and short-term memory

ADHD is influenced by many common genetic variants, each of which increases the risk slightly, says the professor.

In fact, with the help of advanced statistical models, the researchers have estimated that there are around 7,300 common genetic variants that increase the risk of ADHD. It is particularly interesting that the vast majority of these variants — 84-98 percent — also have an influence on other mental disorders, e.g. autism, depression and schizophrenia.

It has previously been shown that risk variants for ADHD can affect a person’s cognitive abilities.

To investigate this further, the researchers analysed data from an independent dataset, consisting of 4,973 people who had undergone extensive neuro-cognitive tests. By using information from the new study about which variants increase the risk of ADHD, they found in the independent data set that an increased load of ADHD risk variants in the genome of an individual is associated with reduced reading and mathematical abilities, reduced attention and reduced short-term memory.

“The results increase our knowledge of the biological mechanisms underlying ADHD, and they point to specific genes, tissues and cell types involved in ADHD. This knowledge can be used as a starting point for further studies of the disease mechanisms and identification of new drug targets,” explains Ditte Demontis.

And the study must be followed up, she emphasises.

“We have only mapped a small fraction of the common variants that influence ADHD — just 27 of the 7,300 that potentially exist. So there is a need for larger genetic studies,” she says.

International cross-disciplinary collaboration is the way forward

Large international collaborations are crucial to identifying the genetic causes of psychiatric diseases and neurodevelopmental disorders, because to do so requires studies of tens or hundreds of thousands of people with these conditions. Just as in the current ADHD study, there are often 100 or more researchers involved, with different areas of expertise, such as genetics, psychiatry, psychology, epidemiology, molecular biology, statistics, bioinformatics and computer science.

“In order to understand more of the genetic and biological mechanisms, it is important to have even larger studies, involving more people with ADHD,” says Professor Anders Børglum of the Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, who is the last author of the study and one of the research directors of the Danish iPSYCH project.

“But it is also important to undertake studies that focus on identifying how the genetic risk variants perturb biological processes in the brain cells (the neurons), and their way of joining up and communicating with each other in the brain. For the latter, both brain cells and early developmental stages of the brain, so-called mini-brains or brain organoids, are currently being examined” he says.

Share Button

Calorie restriction slows pace of aging in healthy adults

In a first of its kind randomized controlled trial an international team of researchers led by the Butler Columbia Aging Center at the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health shows that caloric restriction can slow the pace of aging in healthy adults. The CALERIE™ intervention slowed pace of aging measured from participants’ blood DNA methylation using the algorithm DunedinPACE (Pace of Aging, Computed from the Epigenome). The intervention effect on DunedinPACE represented a 2-3 percent slowing in the pace of aging, which in other studies translates to a 10-15 percent reduction in mortality risk, an effect similar to a smoking cessation intervention. The results are published online in the journal Nature Aging.

“In worms, flies, and mice, calorie restriction can slow biological processes of aging and extend healthy lifespan” says senior author Daniel Belsky, PhD, associate professor of epidemiology at Columbia Mailman School and a scientist with Columbia’s Butler Aging Center. “Our study aimed to test if calorie restriction also slows biological aging in humans.”

The CALERIE™ Phase-2 randomized controlled trial, funded by the US National Institute on Aging, is the first ever investigation of the effects of long-term calorie restriction in healthy, non-obese humans. The trial randomized 220 healthy men and women at three sites in the U. S. to a 25 percent calorie-restriction or normal diet for two years.  CALERIE™ is an acronym for ‘Comprehensive Assessment of Long-Term Effects of Reducing Intake of Energy’.

To measure biological aging in CALERIE Trial participants, Belsky’s team analyzed blood samples collected from trial participants at pre-intervention baseline and after 12- and 24-months of follow-up. “Humans live a long time,” explained Belsky, “so it isn’t practical to follow them until we see differences in aging-related disease or survival. Instead, we rely on biomarkers developed to measure the pace and progress of biological aging over the duration of the study.” The team analyzed methylation marks on DNA extracted from white blood cells. DNA methylation marks are chemical tags on the DNA sequence that regulate the expression of genes and are known to change with aging.

In the primary analysis Belsky and colleagues focused on three measurements of the DNA methylation data, sometimes known as “epigenetic clocks”. The first two, the PhenoAge and GrimAge clocks, estimate biological age, or the chronological age at which a person’s biology would appear “normal”. These measures can be thought of as “odometers” that provide a static measure of how much aging a person has experienced. The third measure studied by the researchers was DunedinPACE, which estimates the pace of aging, or the rate of biological deterioration over time. DunedinPACE can be thought of as a “speedometer”.

“In contrast to the results for DunedinPace, there were no effects of intervention on other epigenetic clocks,” noted Calen Ryan, PhD, Research Scientist at Columbia’s Butler Aging Center and co-lead author of the study. “The difference in results suggests that dynamic ‘pace of aging’ measures like DunedinPACE may be more sensitive to the effects of intervention than measures of static biological age.”

Our study found evidence that calorie restriction slowed the pace of aging in humans” Ryan said.  “But calorie restriction is probably not for everyone. Our findings are important because they provide evidence from a randomized trial that slowing human aging may be possible. They also give us a sense of the kinds of effects we might look for in trials of interventions that could appeal to more people, like intermittent fasting or time-restricted eating.”

A follow-up of trial participants is now ongoing to determine if the intervention had long-term effects on healthy aging. In other studies, slower DunedinPACE is associated with reduced risk for heart disease, stroke, disability, and dementia.  “Our study of the legacy effects of the CALERIE™ intervention will test if the short-term effects observed during the trial translated into longer-term reduction in aging-related chronic diseases or their risk factors,” says Sai Krupa Das, a senior scientist and CALERIE investigator who is leading the long-term follow up of CALERIE™ participants.

DunedinPACE was developed by Daniel Belsky and colleagues at Duke University and the University of Otago. To develop DunedinPACE, researchers analyzed data from the Dunedin Longitudinal Study, a landmark birth cohort study of human development and aging that follows 1000 individuals born in 1972-73 in Dunedin, New Zealand. Researchers first analyzed the rate of change in 19 biomarkers across 20 years of follow-up to derive a single composite measure of the Pace of Aging. Next, the researchers used machine-learning techniques to distill this 20-year Pace of Aging into a single-time-point DNA methylation blood test. The values of the DunedinPACE algorithm correspond to the years of biological aging experienced during a single calendar year, providing a measure of the pace of aging.

The study was supported by US National Institute on Aging grant R01AG061378 and also utilized resources provided by the CALERIE Research Network (R33AG070455) and the Dunedin Study (R01AG032282). Coauthors received additional support from the American Brain Foundation, and NIH grants P30AG028716, R01AG054840, R33AG070455, CIHR RN439810, R01 AG071717, R03AG071549 U01AG060906.

Share Button

Cervical cancer: Health trusts miss abnormal cells in smear tests

A 45-year-old woman says she was devastated after learning that three previous checks had been misread.

Share Button

Ambulance waits cut from more than 90 minutes to 32

NHS performance figures in England show pressure eased in January – but concerns remain.

Share Button