New study supports remdesivir as COVID-19 treatment

The news about remdesivir, the investigational anti-viral drug that has shown early promise in the fight against COVID-19, keeps getting better.

This week researchers at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Gilead Sciences reported that remdesivir potently inhibited SARS-CoV-2, the virus which causes COVID-19, in human lung cell cultures and that it improved lung function in mice infected with the virus.

These preclinical findings help explain the clinical effect the drug has had in treating COVID-19 patients. Remdesivir has been given to patients hospitalized with COVID-19 on a compassionate use basis since late January and through clinical trials since February.

In April, a preliminary report from the multicenter Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial (which included VUMC) suggested that patients who received the drug recovered more quickly.

“All of the results with remdesivir have been very encouraging, even more so than we would have hoped, but it is still investigational, so it was important to directly demonstrate its activity against SARS-CoV-2 in the lab and in an animal model of disease,” said VUMC’s Andrea Pruijssers, PhD.

Pruijssers, research assistant professor of Pediatrics at VUMC and lead antiviral scientist in the laboratory of Mark Denison, MD, is the paper’s co-corresponding author with Timothy Sheahan, PhD, assistant professor of Epidemiology at UNC-Chapel Hill.

Denison, the E.C. Stahlman Professor of Pediatrics at VUMC, directs the Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. He and Ralph Baric, PhD, the William R. Kenan, Jr. Distinguished Professor of Epidemiology at UNC-Chapel Hill, and colleagues have been studying remdesivir since 2014.

They were the first to perform detailed studies to demonstrate that the drug, which was developed by Gilead Sciences to combat hepatitis C and respiratory syncytial virus, and later the Ebola virus, also showed broad and highly potent activity against coronaviruses in laboratory tests.

The current findings, reported this week in the journal Cell Reports, provide “the first rigorous demonstration of potent inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 in continuous and primary human lung cultures.” The study is also the first to suggest that remdesivir can block the virus in a mouse model.

Ongoing clinical trials will determine precisely how much it benefits patients in different stages of COVID-19 disease.

Meanwhile in the laboratory, Pruijssers said, “We also are focusing on how to use remdesivir and other drugs in combinations to increase their effectiveness during COVID-19 and to be able to treat at different times of infection.”

COVID-19, which to date has infected more then 12 million people and killed nearly 600,000 worldwide, is at least the third instance since 2003 in which a coronavirus originally transmitted from bats has caused serious illness in humans.

Thus there is an urgent need to identify and evaluate broadly efficacious and robust therapies that can limit and prevent coronavirus infections. “Broad-spectrum antiviral drugs, antibodies, and vaccines are needed to combat the current pandemic and those that will emerge in the future,” the researchers said.

In addition to SARS-CoV-2, studies in the Denison and Baric labs have shown that remdesivir is effective against a vast array of coronaviruses, including other bat viruses that could emerge in the future in humans.

“We hope that will never happen, but just as we were working to characterize remdesivir over the past six years to be ready for a virus like SARS-CoV-2, we are working and investing now to prepare for any future coronavirus,” Denison said. “We want remdesivir and other drugs to be useful both now and in the future.”

Others VUMC co-authors were Amelia George, MS, Maria Agostini, PhD, Laura Stevens, MS, James Chappell, MD, PhD, Xiaotao Lu, MS, and Tia Hughes, MS.

The study was supported by National Institutes of Health grants AI142759, AI132178 and AI132178-03S1, AI081197 and AI007151, the Dolly Parton COVID-19 Research Fund and the Elizabeth B. Lamb Center for Pediatric Research at Vanderbilt.

Share Button

Health24.com | Loneliness may make quitting smoking even tougher

  • Lonely people may be more likely to smoke
  • Smoking has been identified as a risk factor for poor mental health as nicotine interferes with neurotransmitters
  • Factoring loneliness in as a cause may help smoking cessation services to get people to quit

Being lonely may make it harder to quit smoking, a new British study suggests.

Using genetic and survey data from hundreds of thousands of people, researchers found that loneliness makes it more likely that someone will smoke. This type of analysis is called Mendelian randomisation.

“This method has never been applied to this question before and so the results are novel, but also tentative,” said co-lead author Robyn Wootton, a senior research associate at the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom.

“We found evidence to suggest that loneliness leads to increased smoking, with people more likely to start smoking, to smoke more cigarettes and to be less likely to quit,” Wootton said in a university news release.

Risk factor for poor mental health

These data mesh with an observation that during the coronavirus pandemic, more British people are smoking.

Senior study author Jorien Treur said, “Our finding that smoking may also lead to more loneliness is tentative, but it is in line with other recent studies that identified smoking as a risk factor for poor mental health. A potential mechanism for this relationship is that nicotine from cigarette smoke interferes with neurotransmitters such as dopamine in the brain.” Treur is a visiting research associate from Amsterdam UMC.

The researchers also looked for a connection between loneliness and drinking but found none.

Still, if loneliness causes people to smoke, it is important to alert smoking cessation services so they can add this factor as they help people to quit, the study authors said.

The report was published on 16 June in the journal Addiction.

Image credit: iStock

Share Button

Coronavirus: Data shows cases in England falling

Two reports charting coronavirus show cases in England falling – with Leicester also seeing a fall.

Share Button

Health24.com | Pill might prevent life-threatening allergic reactions

  • Anaphylaxis is a potentially deadly allergic reaction to normally innocent substances
  • A group of medications called BTK inhibitors can slow the anaphylactic response
  • Test have shown promising results, but the pills are very expensive

Pills used to treat blood cancers may potentially prevent life-threatening allergic reactions, early research hints.

That could spell good news for people with severe food and drug allergies.

In lab experiments, researchers found that a group of medications – called BTK inhibitors – can put the brakes on the process that triggers life-threatening allergic reactions known as anaphylaxis.

Anaphylaxis arises from a haywire immune response to a normally benign substance – with certain foods, insect stings and medications common triggers. The reaction occurs quickly after exposure, causing symptoms like breathlessness, rapid hear rate and dangerous drops in blood pressure.

Fear of anaphylaxis

There is no magic bullet to prevent anaphylaxis – a condition that affects at least one in 50 Americans, and possibly up to one in 20, according to the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America.

But researchers hope the new work might pave the way to a pill that can offer broad protection.

That would be “life-changing” for people who live in fear of anaphylaxis, according to senior researcher Dr Bruce Bochner.

Right now, he said, those people largely depend on avoiding their allergy trigger, which can be difficult. Otherwise, there are some options for warding off certain severe reactions, said Bochner, a professor of medicine at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago.

Allergy shots can effectively prevent anaphylaxis from insect stings, for example. And a pill called Palforzia has recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to help prevent severe reactions in children with known peanut allergy.

But if BTK inhibitors pan out, they might offer protection that is not dependent on the type of allergy, Bochner said. BTK stands for Bruton’s tyrosine kinase, and it’s an enzyme within cells that helps set off allergic reactions; blocking it, in theory, could thwart all kinds of allergies.

Reduction in allergic responses

The new findings were published on 2 June in the Journal of Clinical Investigation. They’re based on experiments in the test tube and in lab mice.

Bochner’s team found that three different BTK inhibitors can block allergic responses in human mast cells, which release histamine and other substances that fuel allergy symptoms. And one drug was able to block allergic reactions in lab mice that had human mast cells transplanted into their bodies.

The research was partially funded by Acerta Pharma, which makes the BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib (Calquence).

The results back up two earlier, small studies in humans, by Bochner’s co-researchers Drs Jennifer Regan and Melanie Dispenza.

In one, cancer patients who were on the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib (Imbruvica) had a reduction in their usual allergic responses to pollen and cat dander. In the other, people with food allergies who were given ibrutinib for a few days showed less reactivity on standard allergy skin tests.

However, such test results do not necessarily translate into effectiveness against real-world allergic reactions, according to Dr Thomas Casale. He is chairman of the clinical network steering committee for the non-profit Food Allergy Research and Education.

Casale, who was not involved in the study, called the results “promising”, but said critical questions remain.

Safety questions to be answered

One issue, he said, is that BTK is involved in not only allergic reactions, but normal immune defences. “Whereas blocking this enzyme can be effective in treating certain types of cancers,” Casale said, “there’s a concern that patients would have defects in their immune system that could predispose them towards adverse consequences.”

Some of the known side effects of the drugs, as used for cancer, include pneumonia and a drop in certain white blood cells, Casale pointed out.

Bochner agreed that safety questions have to be answered – particularly regarding children.

“None of these drugs are approved for children,” he said. “With any drug for food allergy, you’d need it to be safe and effective in kids.”

Cost a big issue

And when it comes to food allergies, Casale said, a preventive drug would have to be taken chronically, since exposures are often accidental.

Short-term treatment, he added, would only be helpful for managing high-risk situations – if, for example, someone with a penicillin allergy needed to take that drug.

The notion of long-term treatment brings up another issue: cost. Casale and Bochner said the drugs’ current price tags make them prohibitively expensive. They are in the range of $15 000 (R260 000) for a month’s supply, according to Bochner.

So for now, he said, the findings offer more evidence that the BTK “pathway” is important in allergic reactions, and worth further study.

Image credit: iStock

NEXT ON HEALTH24X

Share Button

Government says sorry to women ‘ignored’ by doctors

The health minister apologises to women, and their children, failed by healthcare professionals.

Share Button

New clues from fruit flies about the critical role of sex hormones in stem cell control

In one of the first studies addressing the role of sex hormones’ impact on stem cells in the gut, scientists outline new insights showing how a steroidal sex hormone, that is structurally and functionally similar to human steroid hormones, drastically alters the way intestinal stem cells behave, ultimately affecting the overarching structure and function of this critical organ. The authors found that ecdysone, a steroid hormone produced by fruit flies, stimulates intestinal stem cell growth and causes the gut of the female fruit fly to grow in size, and induces other critical changes. The study also provides a mechanism to account for sex-specific roles for intestinal stem cells in normal gut function. Moreover, the research presents evidence that gut hormones may accelerate tumor development. The findings, reported jointly by Huntsman Cancer Institute (HCI) at the University of Utah (U of U) and the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), are published today in the journal Nature.

Bruce Edgar, PhD, a stem cell biologist at HCI and professor of oncological sciences at the U of U, together with Aurelio Teleman, PhD, division head at DKFZ and professor at Heidelberg University jointly led the work. They asked whether sex hormones affect intestinal stem cells’ ability to multiply and contribute to gut growth. “My lab and many others around the world have studied the Drosophila gut for some time to better understand how stem cells are regulated,” says Edgar. “We knew that male and female fruit flies exhibited differences in their intestine — for example, the female’s intestine is larger than the male’s, and females develop intestinal tumors much more readily than males — but we didn’t know why.” This study adds significant insights into these differences, and how they arise.

The Edgar and Teleman teams found that ecdysone, a sex-specific hormone, can drastically alter the growth properties of stem cells in an organ that, remarkably, is not directly involved in reproduction. They found that these changes affect the structure and function of the entire organ. They discovered that subjecting male flies to ecdysone caused their otherwise slow dividing stem cells to divide as fast as in females, leading to intestinal growth in males as well. This suggests that the limiting difference between the division of stem cells in male and female flies is the circulating levels of the hormone.

This process confers both advantages and disadvantages to the female fruit fly during the course of its life. Initially, more ecdysone in females helps with the evolutionarily critical processes of reproduction. It promotes gut enlargement, facilitating nutrient absorption, which helps the fly lay more eggs. But later in life, the ecdysone hormone, produced by the ovaries, eventually causes gut disfunction that can shorten the lifespan in female fruit flies by creating an environment that favors tumor growth. While humans don’t produce ecdysone, they do have related steroid hormones such as estrogen, progesterone and testosterone, which have similar mechanisms of action.

The experimental work on this study was performed primarily by Sara Ahmed, a joint PhD student between the Edgar and Teleman labs at the Zentrum für Molekulare Biologie der Universität Heidelberg (ZMBH) and the DKFZ. Ahmed designed experiments utilizing various genetic tools to switch genes on and off in different cell types in the fly’s intestine and in its ovaries, which produce ecdysone. “Our study provides conclusive evidence that sex hormones alter the behavior of non-sex organs like the intestine,” says Ahmed. She further speculates that long-term implications of this research may include exploration of new paths to treating human cancers.

According to the researchers, understanding whether a similar stem cell-hormone relationship operates in human organs will require further studies. They plan to explore this in the future. In addition to the critical role played by sex hormones in intestinal stem cell behavior, the authors believe this study in Drosophila potentially unveils a new mechanism that may play out in human physiology and pathology. Insights from this study add to a growing body of work showing that the incidence cancers of non-reproductive organs, including colon and gastric cancers, are different in males and females.

This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health including the National Cancer Institute P30 CA01420114, the National Institute of General Medical Sciences R01 124434, the European Research Council AdG268515, DKFZ, and Huntsman Cancer Foundation.

Story Source:

Materials provided by Huntsman Cancer Institute. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Share Button

Daytime aardvark sightings are a sign of troubled times

Aardvarks occur across most of sub-Saharan Africa, but very few people have seen one, because they are solitary, mostly active at night, and live in burrows. They use their spade-like claws to build these burrows and to dig up ants and termites on which they feed. However, seeing aardvarks feeding in the day is becoming more common in the drier parts of southern Africa. While catching sight of an aardvark is a delight for many a wildlife enthusiast, researchers from the Wildlife Conservation Physiology laboratory at the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) warn that seeing aardvarks in the daytime does not bode well for this secretive animal.

New research by the team from Wits, with collaborators from the University of Cape Town and University of Pretoria, reveals what a shift from night-time to daytime activity means for the well-being of aardvarks in a warming and drying world. The researchers studied aardvarks living at Tswalu, a reserve in the Kalahari that lies at the edge of the aardvark’s distribution and provides support and infrastructure for researchers through the Tswalu Foundation. The results are published in the journal Frontiers in Physiology.

Using biologgers, the researchers recorded body temperature and activity of aardvarks for three years, during which Dr Nora Weyer followed the aardvarks as part of her PhD research.

Assisted by satellite imaging that showed her how droughts affected the vegetation, Weyer was able to connect changes in aardvark behaviour and body temperature to what was happening in the aardvarks’ environment.

Weyer’s research confirmed earlier findings by the team that there are times when the aardvarks switched their feeding to the day, and showed, for the first time, that drought caused that switch. “We suspected that it was drought,” says co-worker Dr Robyn Hetem, “but we needed a long-term, comprehensive data set to confirm that it really was drought causing this unusual behaviour.”

The Kalahari is arid at the best of times, but drought killed the vegetation that fed the ants and termites. Most of the ants and termites disappeared, leaving the aardvarks starving. “It was heart-breaking to watch our aardvarks waste away as they starved,” says Weyer.

By shifting their activity from the cold nights to the warm days during dry winter months, aardvarks can save some of the energy needed to keep their body temperatures up. But those energy savings were not enough to see the aardvarks through a particularly bad drought in which many aardvarks died.

“Aardvarks have coped with the Kalahari’s harsh environment in the past, but it is getting hotter and drier, and the current and future changes to our climate might be too much for the aardvarks to bear,” says Weyer. “Because the Kalahari is such a unique and potentially vulnerable ecosystem, we need to better understand whether its animals can cope with the increasingly dry conditions,” says Professor Andrea Fuller, co-worker and project leader of the Kalahari Endangered Ecosystem Project (KEEP).

Disappearance of aardvarks from the Kalahari would be devastating for many other animals in this ecosystem. The large burrows which aardvarks build provide important shelters for many other species that cannot dig their own burrows, earning the aardvark the title of ?ecosystem engineer’.

“Unfortunately, the future looks grim for Kalahari aardvarks and the animals that use their burrows. Tackling climate change is key, but there is no quick fix,” says Weyer. What conservationists do know is that any solution will require a much better understanding of what capacities animals have to cope with drought. And that means many more long-term comprehensive studies of physiology and behaviour, like the study that Dr Weyer and her colleagues carried out at Tswalu.

Story Source:

Materials provided by University of the Witwatersrand. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Share Button

When Reality Declines Your Offer

I made some offers to reality this year that it declined. My declined offers included planned trips to Portland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Milwaukee, Chicago, and Costa Rica. If the original plans held up, Rachelle and I would be embarking on about 30 days of travel starting later this month, including two wonderful multi-day events with different groups of friends, lots of touristy activities, probably an Irish excursion, and our first time at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival. Additionally I intended to do an all new public workshop in Las Vegas in October, perhaps even a Halloween-overlapping one like we did in 2010. And we’d be doing more ayahuasca ceremonies with friends in the Fall as well.

In January we were set up for a very creative year with lots of fun travel and social experiences, just the level of stimulation we like.

But then reality looked at our beautiful plans and said, “Nope!”

Reality can do that of course. We co-create our lives with reality. We can set goals and make grand plans, but reality always gets a say. It may allow your plans to unfold. It may actively support and enhance your plans with extra cooperation. Or it may decline your plans altogether and throw you for a loop.

Our January trip to Panama happened as planned. It was exciting to see ships going through the Panama Canal for the first time. The bug bites were vicious, but that just adds to the shared memories. Then sometime in February, our awareness of the coronavirus situation grew, and I began to accept that this wasn’t going to be the kind of year I had planned. I realized that my travel plans were done for well before the event organizers officially canceled them, mainly because I dove into the details and saw early enough glimpses of what was happening and where it was heading.

So then we invested in what we had left – mainly on the work side. I finished recording the 65 lessons for the Stature course. We did our annual launch of Conscious Growth Club. And we continued with life without all the travel and socializing. This wasn’t a big deal through the end of April since the first four months of the year were intended to be a creative burst of activity with no planned travel in February, March, or April.

It’s also been many months since I’ve done an in-person meetup, and on top of that, the cozy coffee and juice bar where we used to host those meetups went out of business due to the virus situation.

I decided to invest some of this time in other areas of life, including making many improvements to my habits and systems. I basically doubled my running time each morning. I refined my diet. I lost weight. I completed many business and personal projects. I did more 30-day challenges. But lately I’ve been realizing that I failed to incorporate a good substitute for the missing energy that I connect with travel and social events – the excitement, the sense of adventure, the exploration, the freshness, the fun, the playfulness, etc. I’m spending too much time dwelling in the known and not enough time living in the mystery. Life has become too predictable, and I haven’t been including enough spontaneity.

One thing I love about my relationship with Rachelle is that we often go on spontaneous trips. Sometimes we leave the same day we get the idea, but usually within 24-48 hours. We’re good at making quick travel plans and just going. It’s a fun. part of our lifestyle. When we feel a surge of energy that wants to express itself this way, we like to give it expression. That’s creating some amazing memories. Somehow I don’t regret any of those impulsive trips, quite the opposite.

I realized this week that it’s time to set some fresh intentions to open up this area of flow. That stuck energy still needs to go somewhere, and I don’t feel the right outlet is present in my life right now. Eventually those outlets will come back, but I sense a lot of bottled up energy that needs a fresh approach. I’m just not sure what that will look like yet.

I discussed this with friends on some Zoom calls yesterday, and while there were many ideas floated like perhaps a camping trip, road trip, or rafting trip, none of them felt quite aligned to me. I’m also not interested in doing something that might risk other people’s lives during this time, so while I crave excitement, I’m not going to be reckless about it.

What’s fascinating to me is that just by acknowledging and discussing this problem, I feel that this energy is already starting to flow again, not into a direct solution yet, but it’s flowing into the possibility space in search of aligned ways it can manifest itself.

Just because the old offer was declined doesn’t mean the energy dissipates. It still wants to express itself somehow. Energy likes to move, not to remain stuck. So I like that this pressure build-up is seeing some movement again, like its request is always being answered, even before I’ve put the request into words.

Intention-wise, I might state it like this: I intend to receive aligned opportunities, invitations, and inspirations to safely reignite the spark of adventure in my life; to break away from the overly familiar; and to explore what feels fresh, new, and exciting again – for the highest good of all.

I accept that my old offer for expressing this energy is dead, but the energy behind the old intention remains very much alive, just suppressed. I don’t see an aligned solution yet, so at this point I’ll send this energy outward to seek opportunities, inspirations, and/or invitations that align with it. Then I’ll see what comes through.

The desire isn’t crisp yet in that I don’t know what form it will take, and that’s okay. I know that I can co-create the form with reality. Something will come through – an impulsive idea, a fascinating invitation, etc. I’ll recognize it by the excitement it stirs within me.

This isn’t the kind of problem I can solve purely at a mental level. It’s also not the kind of problem that other people are able to help me solve at that level. I’ve already received plenty of suggestions from friends about this, but none of them resonate on an emotional or energetic level so far. They all feel like “stuck in the head” ideas. It’s still good to unearth and process those ideas to get them out of the way and clear the slate, as if to move the misaligned energy aside. So now I’m holding out for the right energy signature – a solution that arrives with some excitement and which stirs something in me.

Share Button

Care for cats? So did people along the Silk Road more than 1,000 years ago

Common domestic cats, as we know them today, might have accompanied Kazakh pastoralists as pets more than 1,000 years ago. This has been indicated by new analyses done on an almost complete cat skeleton found during an excavation along the former Silk Road in southern Kazakhstan. An international research team led by Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (MLU), Korkyt-Ata Kyzylorda State University in Kazakhstan, the University of Tübingen and the Higher School of Economics in Russia has reconstructed the cat’s life, revealing astonishing insights into the relationship between humans and pets at the time. The study will appear in the journal Scientific Reports.

The tomcat — which was examined by a team led by Dr Ashleigh Haruda from the Central Natural Science Collections at MLU — did not have an easy life. “The cat suffered several broken bones during its lifetime,” says Haruda. And yet, based on a very conservative estimate, the animal had most likely made it past its first year of life. For Haruda and her colleagues, this is a clear indication that people had taken care of this cat.

During a research stay in Kazakhstan, the scientist examined the findings of an excavation in Dzhankent, an early medieval settlement in the south of the country which had been mainly populated by the Oghuz, a pastoralist Turkic tribe. There she discovered a very well-preserved skeleton of a cat. According to Haruda, this is quite rare because normally only individual bones of an animal are found during an excavation, which prevents any systematic conclusions from being drawn about the animal’s life. The situation is different when it comes to humans since usually whole skeletons are found. “A human skeleton is like a biography of that person. The bones provide a great deal of information about how the person lived and what they experienced,” says Haruda. In this case, however, the researchers got lucky: after its death, the tomcat was apparently buried and therefore the entire skull including its lower jaw, parts of its upper body, legs and four vertebrae had been preserved.

Haruda worked together with an international team of archaeologists and ancient DNA specialists. An examination of the tomcat’s skeleton revealed astonishing details about its life. First, the team took 3D images and X-rays of its bones. “This cat suffered a number of fractures, but survived,” says Haruda. Isotope analyses of bone samples also provided the team with information about the cat’s diet. Compared to the dogs found during the excavation and to other cats from that time period, this tomcat’s diet was very high in protein. “It must have been fed by humans since the animal had lost almost all its teeth towards the end of its life.”

DNA analyses also proved that the animal was indeed likely to be a domestic cat of the Felis catus L. species and not a closely related wild steppe cat. According to Haruda, it is remarkable that cats were already being kept as pets in this region around the 8th century AD: “The Oghuz were people who only kept animals when they were essential to their lives. Dogs, for example, can watch over the herd. They had no obvious use for cats back then,” explains the researcher. The fact that people at the time kept and cared for such “exotic” animals indicates a cultural change, which was thought to have occurred at a much later point in time in Central Asia. The region was thought to have been slow in making changes with respect to agriculture and animal husbandry.

The Dhzankent settlement, where the remains of the cat were found, was located along the Silk Road, an ancient network of important caravan routes that connected Central and East Asia with the Mediterranean region by land. According to Haruda, the find is also an indication of cultural exchange between the regions located along the Silk Road.

Story Source:

Materials provided by Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Share Button

Coronavirus: Asymptomatic testing for taxi drivers and cleaners

A pilot in England will test people without symptoms working in ‘high-contact’ jobs.

Share Button