Health24.com | Obesity and Covid-19: Researchers find major risk for deadly blood clots in the lungs

Obesity makes Covid-19 worse and may lead to deadly blood clots in the lungs, a new study finds.

The researchers said that obese patients with Covid-19 may have nearly three times the risk of developing what is known as a pulmonary embolism.

“Clinicians can utilise our findings to aid in determining which patients should have evaluation for pulmonary embolism with pulmonary CT angiography, as the symptoms for Covid-19 and pulmonary embolism overlap,” said lead researcher Dr Neo Poyiadi, from the department of diagnostic radiology at Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit.

“Early detection of pulmonary embolism can allow prompt treatment with anticoagulation and minimise clinical problems,” he said.

Statins may offer protection

Hospitalised obese patients with Covid-19 should be evaluated for increases in clotting indicated by a rising D-dimer – a blood test for clotting.

According to the study, 22% of 328 patients suffering from Covid-19 who had a CT scan angiography had a pulmonary embolism.

Researchers also found that patients taking statins to lower cholesterol before coming down with Covid-19 were less likely to have a pulmonary embolism.

“Further studies are needed to determine if statins have a protective effect against pulmonary embolism in Covid-19 patients,” Poyiadi said.

Poyiadi added that a recent study suggests that Covid-19 patients should be placed on blood thinners to prevent clotting.

Obesity may make Covid-19 worse because it’s associated with an increase in inflammation. Inflammation also increases the risk of clotting.

The report was published online on 14 May in the journal Radiology.

Inflammation can lead to blood clots

Dr Marc Siegel is a professor of medicine at NYU Langone Medical Center in New York City. He said, “This study underscores a point that’s becoming more widely known about Covid-19 – that obesity leads to an inflammatory cascade. We know that inflammatory chemicals increase with obesity. That’s the suspected mechanism of why obese patients are more at risk for complications.”

Inflammation can lead to blood clots, although that’s not been proven, he noted.

“The complications of Covid-19 that we’ve been seeing are inflammation and a cytokine storm, which causes inflammation in the arteries and blood clots throughout the body – and obesity is a culprit in high-risk patients,” Siegel said.

“To say that’s why we’re seeing more pulmonary embolism in obese patients is plausible. It’s early small numbers, but it’s a very important finding and it’s not surprising,” he said.

What is surprising is it looks like using statins might be helpful. Statins are anti-inflammatories, Siegel noted.

Preventative anticoagulation

But whether statins are protective is something that would have to be carefully studied, he said. There’s no clear-cut reason to start obese patients on statins if they weren’t already taking them when they were admitted to hospital, he added.

Obese patients with Covid-19 need the same care as other patients, Siegel said. That includes anticoagulation. Many of the complications of Covid-19 seem to be caused by clotting, and starting patients on blood thinners may become a standard treatment.

“We’re already starting to look at preventative anticoagulation,” he said. “It’s already something we’re highly aware of, but this study adds evidence to a direct correlation between obesity and blood clots, that’s what’s new here.”

Image credit: iStock

Share Button

Health24.com | Covid-19: Interview with Free State Health MEC on testing, quarantine and more

Free State Health MEC, Montseng Tsiu, considers having to deal with Covid-19- infected individuals who remain asymptomatic as among the main challenges facing the province in its response to the coronavirus pandemic.

By 19 May the Free State had conducted 19 834 tests and recorded 165 confirmed cases, 118 recoveries and six deaths. “[The issue of] people that don’t show signs and symptoms is challenging,” Tsiu said. “There are others who would not only screen but also test and the results [would] come out negative, and then within 14 days when they test again, the results come out positive. We’re dealing with something that is new. We’re still learning.”

In mid-March the Free State recorded its first Covid-19 case when  a medical technologist who worked at various hospitals in Bloemfontein, tested positive. 

Contact tracing

Tsiu told Spotlight after the province announced its first positive case, the department made sure they traced all contacts. “We screened and tested them. We also went to the school her children attended [and we] screened the teachers, learners as well as their families.”

Many of the province’s first infections were in people who attended a three-day-long church gathering early in March. This outbreak prompted a visit by Health Minister Dr Zweli Mkhize. Since then a large screening initiative and tracing of various individuals who attended the church conference were conducted.

“We immediately went to the church, to make sure we covered [traced] each and every one who was part of the gathering. We screened everyone and tested those who needed testing. That following day, after some who attended [the church gathering] tested positive; we quarantined them. We also went as far as asking cell phone companies to assist us in checking [tracing] the movements of those who attended the church gathering and their contacts,” Tsiu said.

One death too many

At 141 positive Covid-19 cases, Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality has the most cases in the province. Free State Premier Sisi Ntombela said this week that the city may remain at level 4 when some areas move to level 3 by end of the month. So far, those who have died from Covid-19 in the province are all men from Bloemfontein between the ages of 51 and 86 years.

Among those who died is a 77-year-old man who  was confirmed positive after the virus was detected through a swab of his remains. This prompted the department to swab the remains of all deceased persons across the province, to ensure they know for certain if anyone died of Covid-19. The department will then trace all the contacts of the deceased for testing. “Most of those who have tested positive have recovered,” Tsiu said. “We only have a few that we have lost, which is something that is bothering us as one death is one too many.

“We have lost six people [to date] due to Covid-19 and we know that they had underlying diseases. To us it’s a concern. We would not want any person to lose their life to this illness.” The head of the Free State Health Department, Dr David Motau, told Spotlight of the six deaths that the province recorded, two had multiple morbidities, two had hypertension and the other two had no known co-morbidities. “The dead were swabbed, and some had cardio-respiratory illnesses such as pneumonia. We’re confident that we should be able to deal with this. We have a situation where we have finite resources for infinite healthcare demands. Those are some factors contributing to the challenges we have,” Motau said.

Upscaling screening and testing efforts

According to Tsiu, the provincial department’s “determination to flatten the curve and curb transmissions has been a combination of tracing contacts, screening and testing”.

“We don’t just initially test,” Tsiu said. “We conduct testing after we have received results from the screening. Our soldiers on the ground, who are the community health workers, are dealing with the community transmission. They conduct door-to-door screenings and educate people about the virus. We go to different communities, erect a tent and our nurses stay there during the day, screening, testing and educating people.”

Compared to other provinces such as the Western Cape and Gauteng, however, the latest statistics from the National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD) show the Free State by early May had done only 597 tests per 100 000 people whereas Gauteng did 736 tests per 100 000 and the Western Cape 1 023 per 100 000 people.

On Tuesday Motau said the province had done a total of 19 834 tests so far. Spotlight asked him about these testing figures.

“You would know that Western Cape and Gauteng are accounting for more than 70% of the cases in the country, so ordinarily it would make sense that they do a lot of tests,” he said. “However, as the Free State we also need to make sure that we test. [Now] we will be doing targeted testing in our vulnerable areas. While the demand is getting higher, you would know that the country as a whole does not have enough test kits, and the national department is working hard at making sure that we get those test kits. We are also in collaboration with private labs and have agreed that we use private labs to do some of our tests that would have come from some of these targeted areas that we’re talking about,” Motau said.

In March, two mobile Covid-19 screening buses provided by the National Health Laboratory Services for screening and testing were stationed at Pelonomi Hospital and Universitas Academic Hospital, respectively. That same month the department collaborated with private health facilities to increase the number of ICU beds to 320 in the province. Tsiu said the province employed about 500 enrolled nurses to increase screening capacity and deployed 40 tracers from the humanitarian organisation Red Cross in the province. Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality in Bloemfontein has 25 tracer teams of 125 tracers per team. These teams include volunteers, CHWs and nurses.

To quarantine or not to quarantine

Tsiu told Spotlight what “helped” was that the provincial authorities do not allow people to self-quarantine. “We have seen that when people say they have self-quarantined, they still get out of their houses and move around. Sometimes they would move carelessly without the masks, so we make sure that you are where we can monitor you on a daily basis,” she said.

Quarantine is when people may have contracted the disease but are asymptomatic. It is dealing with these asymptomatic people Tsiu describes as the province’s biggest challenge. Isolation refers to separating sick people from others. The guidelines of the NICD provide that where it is safe to do so, people can self-isolate at home. In terms of the Regulations to the Disaster Management Act, however, provinces can force people to isolate in state facilities.

When asked about quarantine and the legal and public health concerns underlying it, Motau clarified that although the MEC has given a “political direction that her wish is for the department to be able to deal with the pandemic, they need to admit everyone and there are still some [people] allowed to self-quarantine”.

Motau said they had some successes with self-quarantine. “But the MEC has said she doesn’t want to take chances, and these people must be quarantined. You now look at how you balance the resources in terms of the available quarantine sites together with the number of patients you have,” Motau said.

Doing exceptionally well

According to Tsiu, there are about 1 078 quarantine beds and 449 isolation beds in the province. This includes 881 quarantine beds in Mangaung, 40 beds in Fezile Dabi District, 36 beds in Thabo Mofutsanyana, 55 beds in Lejweleputswa and 66 beds in Xhariep, she said. Tsiu said there are 14 quarantine sites across the province that include eight sites in Mangaung, two in Xhariep, one in Fezile Dabi, one in Thabo Mofutsanyana and two in Lejweleputswa.

The MEC said she is satisfied with the work that is being done. “I think that is what we are doing exceptionally good. Once you test positive, we make sure we remove you from the community and quarantine you at places where we have provided beds for isolation. Those [individuals] who are not yet confirmed, we move them to places [stationed] for them alone, until we get the results and until the 14 days of the incubation period pass. After that, if you’re cleared and did not contract the virus, we let you go.”

But what about concerns that removing people to quarantine sites can contribute to rising levels of stigma around Covid-19 and may derail the response by making people less likely to test? Motau acknowledged the issues of stigma are concerning. “This is a worrying factor that has been discussed at the provincial command centre with the DG [Director-General]. We’re in agreement that if we don’t deal with stigma, we will have a serious problem. So, I think we need to invest a lot to educate our communities and making sure that they know this issue around Covid-19,” he said. 

This article was produced by SPOTLIGHT – health journalism in the public interest. SIGN UP for our newsletter.

Image credit: iStock

Share Button

Coronavirus: Time running out on track and trace, NHS leaders warn

The NHS Confederation warns of “severe” consequences if the right system is not established quickly.

Share Button

Coronavirus: Hydroxychloroquine trial begins in the UK

The study will test the drugs – one of which Donald Trump has said he is taking – against a placebo.

Share Button

Coronavirus: ‘Tackle harmful lockdown drinking,’ BMJ editorial warns

Supermarket sales of alcohol have risen and liver disease could too, a BMJ editorial says.

Share Button

Ancient ocean oxygen levels associated with changing atmospheric carbon dioxide

Why do carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere wax and wane in conjunction with the warm and cold periods of Earth’s past? Scientists have been trying to answer this question for many years, and thanks to chemical clues left in sediment cores extracted from deep in the ocean floor, they are starting to put together the pieces of that puzzle.

Recent research suggests that there was enhanced storage of respired carbon in the deep ocean when levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations were lower than today’s levels. But new research led by a Texas A&M University scientist has reached back even further, for the first time revealing insights into atmospheric carbon dioxide levels in the 50,000 years before the last ice age.

“One of the biggest unknowns about past climate is the cause of atmospheric carbon dioxide variability over global warm-cold cycles,” said Franco Marcantonio, lead author of the study and professor and Jane and Ken R. Williams ’45 Chair in the Department of Geology and Geophysics at Texas A&M. “Here we investigated the ‘how’ of varying carbon dioxide with the ‘where’ — namely, the Eastern Equatorial Pacific Ocean, which is an important region of the world ocean where, today, significant carbon dioxide is exhaled into the atmosphere and the greatest rates phytoplankton growth are found.”

The National Science Foundation-funded research was recently published in Scientific Reports, a Nature Research journal.

To examine ancient carbon dioxide levels, Marcantonio and a team of researchers analyzed an ocean floor sediment core extracted from the deep Eastern Equatorial Pacific Ocean. The 10-meter long core spans about 180,000 years, and the chemistry of the layers of sediment provide scientists with a window into past climates. The chemical measurements they make serve as a proxy for oxygen levels of the deep sea.

Measuring minute traces of uranium and thorium isotopes, the team was able to associate periods of increased storage of respired carbon (and low deep-sea oxygen levels) with periods of decreased global atmospheric carbon dioxide levels during the past 70,000 years.

“By comparing our high-resolution sediment record of deep-sea oxygenation in the Eastern Equatorial Pacific with other areas of the Pacific and Southern Ocean, we find that the Pacific Ocean, like the Southern Ocean, is a location for deep-ocean respired carbon storage during periods of decreased global atmospheric CO2 concentrations,” he said. “Importantly, we put constraints on the location in the water column of the extent of the respired stored carbon pool during cold periods.

“Understanding the past dynamics of Earth’s carbon cycle is of fundamental importance to informing and guiding societal policy-making in a warming world with increasing levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide.”

Co-authors of the study were Ryan Hostak, a former Texas A&M graduate student who earned his master’s degree in geology in 2019; Jennifer E. Hertzberg, who received her Ph.D. in oceanography from Texas A&M in 2015 and is now a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences at Old Dominion University; and Matthew W. Schmidt, associate professor of Ocean, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at Old Dominion. Marcantonio and his colleagues designed the study, he and Hostak performed the isotope analyses, and the team interpreted the data.

“By performing similar studies in sediment covering a wider swath of the deep Pacific Ocean, we’ll be able to spatially map the extent of this past deep pool of respired carbon,” Marcantonio said, looking forward to future research.

The study’s radiogenic and trace element analyses were conducted in the College of Geosciences’ R. Ken Williams Radiogenic Isotope Facility. The sediment core was extracted by Marcantonio and colleagues on an NSF-funded research cruise aboard the R/V Melville in 2010.

Story Source:

Materials provided by Texas A&M University. Original written by Leslie Lee. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Share Button

How cosmic rays may have shaped life

Before there were animals, bacteria or even DNA on Earth, self-replicating molecules were slowly evolving their way from simple matter to life beneath a constant shower of energetic particles from space.

In a new paper, a Stanford professor and a former post-doctoral scholar speculate that this interaction between ancient proto-organisms and cosmic rays may be responsible for a crucial structural preference, called chirality, in biological molecules. If their idea is correct, it suggests that all life throughout the universe could share the same chiral preference.

Chirality, also known as handedness, is the existence of mirror-image versions of molecules. Like the left and right hand, two chiral forms of a single molecule reflect each other in shape but don’t line up if stacked. In every major biomolecule — amino acids, DNA, RNA — life only uses one form of molecular handedness. If the mirror version of a molecule is substituted for the regular version within a biological system, the system will often malfunction or stop functioning entirely. In the case of DNA, a single wrong handed sugar would disrupt the stable helical structure of the molecule.

Louis Pasteur first discovered this biological homochirality in 1848. Since then, scientists have debated whether the handedness of life was driven by random chance or some unknown deterministic influence. Pasteur hypothesized that, if life is asymmetric, then it may be due to an asymmetry in the fundamental interactions of physics that exist throughout the cosmos.

“We propose that the biological handedness we witness now on Earth is due to evolution amidst magnetically polarized radiation, where a tiny difference in the mutation rate may have promoted the evolution of DNA-based life, rather than its mirror image,” said Noémie Globus lead author of the paper and a former Koret Fellow at the Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (KIPAC).

In their paper, published on May 20 in Astrophysical Journal Letters, the researchers detail their argument in favor of cosmic rays as the origin of homochirality. They also discuss potential experiments to test their hypothesis.

Magnetic polarization from space

Cosmic rays are an abundant form of high-energy radiation that originate from various sources throughout the universe, including stars and distant galaxies. After hitting the Earth’s atmosphere, cosmic rays eventually degrade into fundamental particles. At ground level, most of the cosmic rays exist only as particles known as muons.

Muons are unstable particles, existing for a mere 2 millionths of a second, but because they travel near the speed of light, they have been detected more than 700 meters below Earth’s surface. They are also magnetically polarized, meaning, on average, muons all share the same magnetic orientation. When muons finally decay, they produce electrons with the same magnetic polarization. The researchers believe that the muon’s penetrative ability allows it and its daughter electrons to potentially affect chiral molecules on Earth and everywhere else in the universe.

“We are irradiated all the time by cosmic rays,” explained Globus, who is currently a post-doctoral researcher at New York University and the Simons Foundation’s Flatiron Institute. “Their effects are small but constant in every place on the planet where life could evolve, and the magnetic polarization of the muons and electrons is always the same. And even on other planets, cosmic rays would have the same effects.”

The researchers’ hypothesis is that, at the beginning of life of on Earth, this constant and consistent radiation affected the evolution of the two mirror life-forms in different ways, helping one ultimately prevail over the other. These tiny differences in mutation rate would have been most significant when life was beginning and the molecules involved were very simple and more fragile. Under these circumstances, the small but persistent chiral influence from cosmic rays could have, over billions of generations of evolution, produced the single biological handedness we see today.

“This is a little bit like a roulette wheel in Vegas, where you might engineer a slight preference for the red pockets, rather than the black pockets,” said Roger Blandford, the Luke Blossom Professor in the School of Humanities and Sciences at Stanford and an author on the paper. “Play a few games, you would never notice. But if you play with this roulette wheel for many years, those who bet habitually on red will make money and those who bet on black will lose and go away.”

Ready to be surprised

Globus and Blandford suggest experiments that could help prove or disprove their cosmic ray hypothesis. For example, they would like to test how bacteria respond to radiation with different magnetic polarization.

“Experiments like this have never been performed and I am excited to see what they teach us. Surprises inevitably come from further work on interdisciplinary topics,” said Globus.

The researchers also look forward to organic samples from comets, asteroids or Mars to see if they too exhibit a chiral bias.

“This idea connects fundamental physics and the origin of life,” said Blandford, who is also Stanford and SLAC professor of physics and particle physics and former director of KIPAC. “Regardless of whether or not it’s correct, bridging these very different fields is exciting and a successful experiment should be interesting.”

This research was funded by the Koret Foundation, New York University and the Simons Foundation.

Share Button

Elucidating the mechanism of a light-driven sodium pump

Researchers at the Paul Scherrer Institute PSI have succeeded for the first time in recording, in action, a light-driven sodium pump from bacterial cells. The findings promise progress in the development of new methods in neurobiology. The researchers used the new X-ray free-electron laser SwissFEL for their investigations. They have published their findings today in the journal Nature.

Sodium, which is contained in ordinary table salt, plays an essential role in the vital processes of most biological cells. Many cells build up a concentration gradient between their interior and the environment. For this purpose, special pumps in the cell membrane transport sodium out of the cell. With the help of such a concentration gradient, cells of the small intestine or the kidneys, for example, absorb certain sugars.

Such sodium pumps are also found in the membranes of bacteria. They belong to the family of the so-called rhodopsins. These are special proteins that are activated by light. For example, rhodopsins transport sodium out of the cell in the case of bacteria living in the ocean, such as Krokinobacter eikastus. The crucial component of rhodopsin is the so-called retinal, a form of vitamin A. It is of central importance for humans, animals, certain algae and many bacteria. In the retina of the human eye, for example, retinal initiates the visual process when it changes shape under the influence of light.

Lightning-fast movie making

Researchers at the Paul Scherrer Institute PSI have now succeeded capturing images of the sodium pump of Krokinobacter eikastus in action and documenting the molecular changes necessary for sodium transport. To do this, they used a technique called serial femtosecond crystallography. A femtosecond is one-quadrillionth of a second; a millisecond is the thousandth part. The sample to be examined — in this case a crystallised sodium pump — is struck first by a laser and then by an X-ray beam. In the case of bacterial rhodopsin, the laser activates the retinal, and the subsequent X-ray beam provides data on structural changes within the entire protein molecule. Since SwissFEL produces 100 of these femtosecond X-ray pulses per second, recordings can be made with high temporal resolution. “We can only achieve temporal resolution in the femtosecond range at PSI with the help of SwissFEL,” says Christopher Milne, who helped to develop the Alvra experimental station where the recordings were made. “One of the challenges is to inject the crystals into the setup so that they meet the pulses of the laser and the X-ray beam with pinpoint accuracy.”

Pump in action

In the current experiment, the time intervals between the laser and X-ray pulses were between 800 femtoseconds and 20 milliseconds. Each X-ray pulse creates a single image of a protein crystal. And just as a cinema film ultimately consists of a large number of individual photographs that are strung together in a series and played back rapidly, the individual pictures obtained with the help of SwissFEL can be put together to form a kind of film.

“The process that we were able to observe in our experiment, and which roughly corresponds to the transport of a sodium ion through a cell membrane, takes a total of 20 milliseconds,” explains Jörg Standfuss, who heads the group for time-resolved crystallography in the Biology and Chemistry Division at PSI . “Besides elucidating the transport process, we were also able to show how the sodium pump achieves its specificity for sodium through small changes in its structure.” This ensures that only sodium ions, and no other positively charged ions, are transported. With these investigations, the researchers also revealed the molecular changes through which the pump prevents sodium ions that have been transported out of the cell from flowing back into it.

Advances in optogenetics and neurobiology

Since sodium concentration differences also play a special role in the way nerve cells conduct stimuli, neurons have powerful sodium pumps in their membranes. If more sodium flows into the cell’s interior, a stimulus is transmitted. These pumps then transport the excess sodium in the cell to the outside again.

Since the sodium pump of Krokinobacter eikastus is driven by light, researchers can now use it for so-called optogenetics. With this technology, cells, in this case nerve cells, are genetically modified in such a way that they can be controlled by light. The pump is installed in nerve cells using methods of molecular genetics. If it is then activated by light, a neuron can no longer transmit stimuli, for example, since this would require an increase in the sodium concentration in the nerve cell. However, bacterial rhodopsin prevents this by continuously transporting sodium out of the cell. Thus active sodium pumps render a neuron inactive.

“If we understand exactly what is going on in the sodium pump of the bacterium, it can help to improve experiments in optogenetics,” says Petr Skopintsev, a PhD candidate in the time-resolved crystallography group. “For example, it can be used to identify variants of bacterial rhodopsin that work more effectively than the form that is usually found in Krokinobacter.” In addition, the researchers hope to gain insights into how individual mutations can change the ion pumps so that they then transport ions other than sodium.

Share Button

Exploding Your Mindset Box

Some of the biggest traps in self-development are mindset traps, usually because they’re invisible to us. We get ourselves into a mindset box but can’t see the walls.

What if the mindset box you’re in doesn’t contain any solutions to your biggest problems? What if those answers exist only outside the box?

A common symptom of this trap is when you think you’ve tried just about everything and still aren’t getting results in a particular area. This is often true of financial, career, relationship, and health challenges.

What you’ve really done is tried many solutions that are accessible within the same mindset box. None of them have worked for you because the mindset box itself is the problem.

For instance, one mindset box is the self-absorption box that I shared in yesterday’s post. When you’re in this box, you frame your problems self-referentially, as if the whole world revolves around you. While that can be an empowering frame for some types of problems, it’s especially weak for overcoming with financial and relationship challenges. Consequently, you’ll often find self-absorbed people struggling with their finances and relationships. And they’re usually blind to how much the self-absorption mindset is limiting them.

Would you want to be in a relationship with someone who’s highly self-absorbed and has a hard time considering other people’s perspectives? Would you want to do business with such a person? When you look at this mindset box from the outside, its limitations become apparent, but when you’re inside the box, you probably won’t realize that the mindset itself is the problem.

This is a key point to understand. You’re in your own mindset box right now, and it’s limiting you. Moreover, you can’t even see how it’s limiting you. What you can see, however, is your frustrating lack of results in a particular area.

Consider some area of your life that stubbornly refuses to progress towards greater results, no matter how much you work on it. Now ask yourself this: How could your own mindset box could be preventing you from making progress? Ask yourself what other mindsets people use to get results in this area. Consider how someone with a different mindset might approach this problem.

Most importantly, test different behaviors that conflict or disagree with your current mindset. Play with them by taking actions that you’d only take if you adopted an opposing mindset. You don’t have to agree with a mindset to test its behaviors. New behaviors can generate new results for you, even if you still vehemently disagree with the mindset behind that behavior.

Which behaviors have you rejected because they don’t agree with your current mindset box? Try some of those behaviors, and see where they lead. This is how you can start exploring beyond your mindset box.

A key limiting belief to overcome here is that you can only test actions and behaviors that align with your current mindset box. That isn’t true at all. You’re free to test behaviors that conflict with your mindset. Your ability to take action isn’t beholden to obey any particular mindset. Behaviors stem from thoughts, and mindsets stem from thoughts, and those thoughts needn’t agree with each other. Your brain is plenty big enough to hold space for opposing thoughts.

So be deliberately disagreeable with the mindset that’s generating behaviors that aren’t getting results for you. Be disobedient. Be willing to explore in direct violation of that mindset.

For instance, if you have a neediness or a self-absorption mindset, those mindsets are traps that will limit your results. What behaviors would be in conflict with such mindsets? How about volunteering? If you’re needy or self-absorbed, you’re not going to volunteer to help others. Only someone who has a mindset of kindness, generosity, or abundance will volunteer their time and energy to help others, right? So this behavior will clearly irritate your neediness or self-absorption mindset. Perfect! That’s exactly what to you ought to do then.

Your old mindset box will raise plenty of objections about why you can’t do a behavior that conflicts with it. Wonderful! Let it object because you have a much bigger counter-objection. Here’s your counter-objection:

Oh yeah… well you suck at getting results!

Let your old mindset chew on that for a while. Now matter how much it whines at you, face it down with the hard truth it doesn’t want to hear: You’re not getting results, old mindset. You’ve repeatedly let us down.

This approach has turned my life around multiple times. I did the volunteering thing when I was broke and going bankrupt. My old mindset objected vehemently, but my attitude was that the old mindset never worked for me anyway, so what did I have to lose by trying something totally different? My finances turned around that same year, and I haven’t had any problems with scarcity since. That was 21 years ago. The old mindset could never solve that problem for me. But a simple new behavior solved it beautifully.

New behaviors will crack your old mindsets that didn’t work, eventually leading you to new mindsets that align with the new behavior. And now you’re outside of the old box, and now your new mindset will generate still more behaviors, and some of those behaviors will help you get better results. Quite often you won’t figure out the new mindset though till you explore the behaviors that lead you to it.

So it’s not always true that your first behavioral exploration outside your old mindset will create breakthrough results, but by cracking the old mindset, you’ll gain access to even more behaviors. You’ll expand the possibility space by tearing down the old walls. This gives you a much better chance of finding and adopting behaviors that generate better results than your old mindset box ever could.

The benefits of exploring beyond my own mindset boxes have been profound. This is a key reason I do so many personal growth experiments that other people would find questionable. I like to explore behaviors that challenge and push the boundaries my mindset box.

Some of these behavioral experiments include:

  • Going to Disneyland for 30 days in a row
  • Eating a low-fat raw diet for 30 days
  • Going skydiving
  • Going vegan
  • Joining Toastmasters and doing speech contests
  • Doing live events on the Vegas Strip
  • Water fasting for 40 days
  • Training for and running a marathon
  • Traveling through Europe for several weeks without paying for a place to stay
  • Doing lots of manifestation experiments
  • Becoming a hugger
  • Going to a cuddle party
  • Learning to play guitar
  • Moving to Las Vegas
  • Learning card counting for blackjack
  • Becoming an early riser
  • Starting a computer games business fresh out of college
  • Seeing 200+ independent theater productions (and assisting in some)
  • Shifting from a fenced relationship to an open relationship
  • Blogging every day for a year (my current one)
  • Inviting and experiencing threesomes
  • Joining the Church of Scientology and going to one of their centers for a few months
  • Going on a 4000-mile road trip
  • Converting to a smart home with cleaning robots, voice-controlled thermostats, and numerous smart devices from Apple, Amazon, and Google
  • Traveling many times with a one-way ticket, not knowing when I’d return
  • Joining an improv troupe for a few months
  • Doing ayahuasca four nights in a row

Did all of these experiments fit neatly into my mindset at the time I tried them? Heck no!

You try walking into a Scientology center without your mind generating a slew of objections. You try showing up at Disneyland with the expectation that you’re going to spend a full month of your life there. You try pulling out your credit card to reserve a meeting room on the Vegas Strip for a 3-day workshop when you’ve never done one before. Of course your mind is going to object when you step outside its boundaries!

I revel in these kinds of experiments though because they keep destroying the walls of old mindset boxes that no longer serve me. Sometimes even a good mindset that generates pleasing results for a while can feel limiting after a while. Maybe you start feeling bored and listless. That’s a good time to mix things up by violating your current mindset with some objectionable behaviors.

One of my next mindset box violations that I want to attempt this year is to write a novel. I’ve never written a novel before, so of course my mind objects to that idea. I have written millions of words of published content, including my nonfiction book Personal Development for Smart People, but fiction feels like a different beast entirely.

So of course my current mindset objects to this idea. What if I write a novel and it absolutely sucks? What if everyone trashes it as the worst piece of crap they’ve ever read? What if it takes way longer than I expect? What if I can’t get the story to converge on a decent ending? Yada yada yada.

When I see objections like that, to me that’s a damned good reason to take action and try out the new behavior. If my old mindset objects so much, then its walls must be feeling vulnerable. Just making the attempt could lead me to some fresh mindset territory. Regardless of how the novel turns out, the path of exploring fiction will be an expansive one.

Probe the limitations of your current mindset. Look for behaviors that your current mindset says you can’t possibly do. Then explore those behaviors anyway. Smash the walls of your old mindset box, and you’ll surely discover more empowering mindsets and behaviors. And don’t stop. Keep smashing!

The key benefit here is that when you violate a limiting mindset, you gain access to new results. Do you want better results, or would you prefer to continue wallowing in freakish misery?

I don’t have to deal with being broke anymore because I smashed down the walls that caused me to get stuck there. I spent most of my 20s behind those walls, but my 30s and 40s were free of them. Have you smashed the walls of brokeness yet? If not, then your current mindset probably sucks and needs to be smashed. So find a behavior that violates that mindset, and go test it for a month or two.

I don’t have to deal with a lack of affection in my life anymore. I smashed those walls too. So I get to enjoy a super affectionate wife who hugs, kisses, and cuddles me every day. Have you smashed the walls of emotional neediness yet? What behavior would violate the old mindset that isn’t getting the job done? Yup, that one!

If I didn’t explore beyond the mindset boxes that limited me, I’d probably still be dealing with crappy, unwanted results in many areas of life. Now whenever I don’t like my results, I have a method for getting past the “I’ve tried everything and none of it works” nonsense.

The best part is that it’s actually fun to do this kind of smashing, once you get used to it. Sometimes it’s fun just to see other people’s reactions. Sometimes it’s exciting thinking about how different life will be for a while. I really enjoyed the 30 days at Disneyland, for instance. Somehow I never got bored, and that experience pushed me to think bigger. I realized that Walt Disney got that whole monstrosity going by stepping into behaviors that made other people think he was crazy. I don’t think I’d have started Conscious Growth Club if I hadn’t done that Disney experiment.

I challenge you to violate a mindset box that limits you. Commit yourself to a course of action that the old mindset box tells you is out of bounds. If the old mindset isn’t generating the results you want anyway, throw that back in its face when it objects. Don’t blame yourself for the lack of results. Blame your old mindset.

When you do this often enough, you’ll start to trust the process more. I know it’s scary the first few times, but that fear is just one more mindset box to blow up. So many awesome results in life can be found on the other side of fear… the other side of worry… the other side of playing small.

Share Button

Health24.com | Newborn may have contracted coronavirus in the womb

A Canadian newborn is a “probable” case of infection with the new coronavirus while still in the womb, doctors report.

Other such cases have been suspected and reported in prior studies. But the mother’s active case of Covid-19, along with the fact that the baby boy was delivered via C-section, add weight to the notion that maternal-foetal transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus can occur, the Toronto doctors concluded.

There was good news, however: Although the baby was born preterm (about 36 weeks), he was a healthy 6.5 pounds. And even though testing positive for coronavirus, he did not develop Covid-19.

Still, the case “represents a probable case of congenital SARS-CoV-2 infection in a liveborn neonate,” said researchers led by paediatrician Dr Prakesh Shah, of Toronto’s Mount Sinai Hospital. They published their report on 14 May in the Canadian Medical Association Journal.

‘Semi-urgent’ C-section

As Shah’s group noted, prior studies from China have already confirmed coronavirus infection in newborns born to women infected with the new coronavirus. But it’s been tough to ascertain whether the infant picked up the infection via contact with the vaginal canal during birth, or by being held by the mother, or by breastfeeding.

In the new case, a 40-year-old pregnant woman arrived at the hospital to deliver her baby. She was already suffering from active Covid-19, with body aches, reduced appetite, fatigue, dry cough and a fever of 102 degrees Fahrenheit (38.88 degrees Celsius).

Luckily, she did not require any respiratory support, her doctors said, but it was decided that the woman undergo a “semi-urgent” C-section.

Her baby boy was “vigorous” upon birth and didn’t require any help breathing. However, nasal swab tests conducted at birth, one day after, and then again seven days after, all turned up positive for infection with the new coronavirus.

It’s impossible to confirm that the infant contracted the virus while still in the womb, but Shah’s team wrote that the woman did have reduced immune system function, which would leave her body more vulnerable to the virus.

Infection via the placenta

As well, testing of her placenta revealed inflammation in those tissues that was “consistent with primary viral infection”, the doctors said.

The baby boy had not come in contact with the woman’s vaginal tract during his C-section delivery, and all precautions were taken (masks, gloves etc.) to minimise the spread of coronavirus from mom to newborn in the hours after birth.

So, “we suspect the possibility of a transamniotic route of [coronavirus] infection via the placenta,” the team wrote.

Dr Adi Davidov is associate chair of gynaecology at Staten Island University Hospital in New York City. Reading over the Toronto findings, he said, “This is the first report that clearly shows that there is a small possibility that Covid can be transmitted in utero.”

Davidov added that although people primarily think of SARS-CoV-2 as invading the respiratory tract, “it can occasionally be found in other areas of the body”, and that may include the uterus and placenta.

A rare phenomenon

Still, maternal-foetal transmission of coronavirus probably isn’t common, he believes.

“Given that we have now delivered hundreds of mothers infected with the SARS-CoV-2 and we have not seen this phenomenon, it is pretty safe to assume that this is a rare phenomenon,” Davidov said. “Nonetheless, it is important for clinicians to be aware of this situation and to screen all newborns for Covid-19.”

Shah and his colleagues added that it’s important for health care workers caring for newborns to understand the potential hazard.

“All health care providers attending an infected woman’s delivery and caring for the baby in the NICU should recognise this risk and use appropriate personal protective equipment to prevent droplet, contact and aerosol transmission [of the coronavirus],” they said.

Image credit:

Share Button