5G Coronavirus Conspiracies

Why do so many people seem to (mistakenly) think there’s a connection between the 5G rollout and the coronavirus, despite plenty of evidence to the contrary?

In this case the evidence points to this originating from a Russian disinformation campaign much like we saw leading up to the 2016 election in the USA. The 5G one in particular has been very effective in duping many people and persuading them to spread the disinformation. Such campaigns breed distrust among citizens, which plays into Russia’s political advantage. Same goes for the anti-trust campaign related to “the media.”

So the 5G hoax is really just a disinformation campaign that many people are succumbing to. It’s what happens when geopolitical maneuvering infects social media. To the extent there’s an actual conspiracy, it’s a lot more basic and common than the 5G one, and this sort of behavior is certainly not limited to Russia. Humans have been using disinformation campaigns for thousands of years. It’s a prestigious line of work with a long and glorious tradition.

Ironically the people spreading this 5G-coronavirus idea are behaving like viruses themselves by infecting others with similar falsehoods. While you may think that such people are being too suspicious, the reality is that they’re actually being too naïve and trusting. If they were more skeptical, they’d evaluate the evidence rationally (instead of emotionally) and quickly realize that it’s untrue since it doesn’t mesh with readily available facts.

When I see people spreading disinformation campaigns like the 5G one, I will generally quarantine them from my social sphere by adding them to my block list. I prefer to prevent further risk of contamination within my slice of social media. I won’t interfere with their personal deep dive into disinformation campaigns if they choose to experience that, but it would be inconceivable to join them in the pit of despair.

Yes, human beings can do evil acts sometimes, and they’re often negligent and expedient, which can cause a host of problems. But humans also tend to be too simplistic to rise to the level of fanciful hoaxes that require them to perform like an organized team of Lex Luthors.

Share Button

Health24.com | Coronavirus morning update: SA reports 9 deaths and Bill Gates has his eye on Africa for vaccine trial

WHAT’S HAPPENING IN SA

Cases update: 

The latest number of confirmed cases is 1585.

Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal, and the Western Cape continue to account for the majority of the cases.

According to the National Department of Health, more than 53 900 tests have been conducted so far.

READ MORE | All the confirmed cases of coronavirus in SA

LATEST NEWS:

South Africa now has 1585 cases of coronavirus infections, and nine confirmed deaths, health minister Zweli Mkhize said in a statement on Saturday.

53 937 tests have been done.

Gauteng has 693 cases, most of all provinces, followed by the Western Cape with 433 cases and KwaZulu-Natal with 232.

Of the KZN cases, 11 and three deaths are linked to the St Augustine’s Hospital; these are patients, health workers and staff members.

READ MORE | Coronavirus: 53 937 test later – 1585 cases and 9 deaths

Just under 80 students, recently returned from China, have been given the all clear to return to their families.

This follows a 14-day quarantine period at the Birchwood Hotel in Ekurhuleni.

The students have all tested negative for Covid-19. This was confirmed by Minister of Higher Education, Science and Technology, Blade Nzimande on Saturday.

Seventy-six students, from provinces around the country, will return to their families. Another four students, who arrived in South Africa later, will remain at the hotel to complete their 14-day quarantine period.

READ MORE | SA students from China released from quarantine in Ekurhuleni 

Talks to have a potential vaccine for Covid-19 tested in Africa, because the number of infected people is not as high as other countries like Italy, have been met with much resistance from people across the continent. 

On Saturday President Cyril Ramaphosa posted a tweet saying the Bill Gates Foundation has supported the country’s health needs for many years: “They have offered assistance with innovative mass-based testing kits and research. I spoke to @BillGates and he commended the swift and decisive action South Africa has taken on #COVID19,” the tweet read. 

Ramaphosa posted a video where the renowned businessman briefly explained his chat with the SA president.

In the video, speaking to host of the Daily Show, Trevor Noah, Gates said: “For developing countries, it’s far harder and so these measures actually stop it from getting to the large part of the population, in places like India and Nigeria. I was talking to President Ramaphosa today, who is not only president of South Africa, he’s also the head of African Union. He is a very strong voice there, encouraging African countries to act quickly when the number of cases is still fairly low, which is true throughout sub-Saharan Africa right now,” he said in the video. 

READ MORE | Bill Gates confident a potential coronavirus vaccine will work in Africa, but Twitter does not think so

The Western Cape government plans on moving thousands of people, living in informal settlements, to temporary sites. The move is part of the City’s plan to space people out and prevent a surge in Covid-19 infections.

But Fezeka Mrwetyana, a resident in Dunoon, Cape Town, told News24 she will not budge.

“I can’t leave, I want to stay here. Only if they promise me it’s a permanent place for me. They have water, toilets, everything and it’s as close as Dunoon,” Mrwetyana explained.

She has been living in Dunoon for the last 28 years, and says her life is there.

WATCH | Plans in motion to move thousands from Dunoon, but some residents say they won’t go

WHAT’S HAPPENING IN THE REST OF THE WORLD?

Cases update:

For the latest global data, follow this interactive map from Johns Hopkins University & Medicine.

Late on Saturday night, positive cases worldwide were close to 1 187 000, while deaths were more than 64 000.

The Unites States had more than 300 000 cases, while Italy and Spain both had more than 124 000.

Italy had more than 15 300 deaths.

READ MORE | All the confirmed cases worldwide

Latest news:

The US government has begun advising people to wear masks if they go outside, pointing to research that shows the coronavirus could be spread just by breathing.

The advice came as America logged another huge rise in its death toll, almost 1 500 in one day, and as new infections continued unabated.

It also came as China, the origin of the outbreak, held a national day of mourning for its citizens killed by the disease.

Since Covid-19 emerged late last year, around 1.1 million people have fallen ill. Almost 60,000 people have died.

WATCH | Americans told to wear masks over virus breathing spread fears 

The coronavirus pandemic has put the spotlight on shortcomings in health care in several North African countries, even as governments moved quickly to announce restrictions to limit the spread of the virus.

“Our fate is in the hands of a health system that we have neglected for years”, a doctor in the Moroccan city of Marrakesh said in a video widely shared on social media.

Covid-19 patients in Morocco have denounced the conditions in public hospitals, reigniting nagging controversy over the underfunded health sector.

In a stagnating Tunisia, the government has struggled to mobilise funds to face the Covid-19 pandemic.

READ MORE: Virus crisis shines light on troubled North Africa health care

HEALTH NEWS:

While the coronavirus pandemic is spreading panic and becoming a nightmare for people around the world, going into lockdown for 21 days can be even more stressful, especially if you’re isolated with your loved ones – and things start to get a little heated.

South African psychiatrist, Professor Renata Schoeman, explains the importance of having boundaries in this kind of situation.

WATCH | Coronavirus: Cooped up with loved ones during lockdown? Here’s how to survive

Uncertainty around the coronavirus pandemic can worsen your anxiety, especially if you’re going to be alone during the next 21 days. Local psychiatrist, Professor Renata Schoeman, gives us some practical tips on how to prepare, and not panic, during this trying time.

WATCH | Coronavirus lockdown: It’s really important that you keep the social connections going’

If you find yourself battling with mental illness, such as anxiety and depression, during the 21-day lockdown, you should consider reaching out for professional help, says South African psychiatrist, Professor Renata Schoeman.

WATCH | Not coping with self-isolation? Here’s when it’s time to reach out for help

HEALTH TIPS (as recommended by the NICD and WHO):

• Avoid contact with people who have respiratory infections 

• Maintain physical distancing – stay at least one metre away from somebody who is coughing or sneezing

• Practise frequent hand-washing, especially after direct contact with ill people or their environment

• Avoid touching your eyes, nose and mouth, as your hands touch many surfaces and could potentially transfer the virus

• Practise respiratory hygiene – cover your mouth with your bent elbow or tissue when you cough or sneeze. Remember to dispose the tissue immediately after use.

READ MORE: Coronavirus 101 

Image credit: Getty Images

Share Button

Sprinkle Goals

I think of a sprinkle goal as being a token goal that’s added to a goal list to try to create better balance. It adds the impression of balance, but it doesn’t really connect with deeper meaning or purpose.

Picture the sprinkles on top of a cupcake. They look nice, but they don’t really add much substance to the cupcake. And if you only have sprinkle goals, then you have no cupcake at all. You just have some colored sugar.

Here are some examples of sprinkle goals:

  • Read 10 books
  • Exercise more
  • Spend time with my wife / husband / kids
  • Connect with my friends each week
  • Spend less time online
  • Make a new social media post each day
  • Spend X hours per week on decluttering
  • Organize my finances

To really determine if a goal is a sprinkle goal, you have to view it in context. You’re the only one who can make that determination about your own goals.

One person’s sprinkle goals may actually be meaningful for another person. For one person a goal like reading 10 new books may feel very purposeful, while for someone else it’s just something tossed onto the pile to pay lip service to learning, creating the illusion of more balance.

Sprinkle goals don’t generate much commitment, and they’re often phrased noncommittally. A common sign of a sprinkle goal is when a goal contains words like more or less. It doesn’t connect with real behavioral changes or specific outcomes.

Sprinkle goals are lazy goals. When someone sets a sprinkle goal, they haven’t thought through much to the implementation side. They usually stop at the formation of the goal and leave it at that, so it just perpetually hangs there in space. It isn’t turned into something specific. There isn’t a sense of wanting to follow through into action when the goal is set.

A sprinkle goal normally lacks a connection to deeper meaning and purpose. It may take a stab in that direction, but it somehow misses.

Which 10 books are you book are you going to read? Why do you want to read them? What will be missing from your life if you skip this? What’s the point?

Why do you want to spend more time with your wife? Doing what specifically? Does watching TV together count? What are you trying to change or improve about your relationship?

One way to spot a sprinkle goal is to ask: If this were my only goal, how much would it matter?

What if your only goal was to read 10 books? What if your only goal was to spend more time with your kids? Those could matter enough if they’re connected with a deeper meaning and purpose, but most of the time when people ask this question, the hollowness of their sprinkle goals becomes apparent.

Is it so terrible to have sprinkle goals? No, you could have a few. They may still add some value to your life. But you’ll probably get more value if you redefine them into more meaningful and specific ones.

A sprinkle goal is really an excuse not to think deeply about setting true and meaningful goals in some area of life. Setting a goal like “read 10 books” hides the fact that you haven’t really figured out what role self-education will play in your life or what new skills and knowledge you want to gain and why.

Setting a goal like “spend more time with my husband” means you haven’t really thought through where your relationship is going and how you’d actually like to see it grow and improve.

A sprinkle goal is a replacement for the hard work of real goal setting. They’re often added on top after you’ve gotten tired of thinking deeply about your other goals, and you don’t want to invest the same depth of thought into other areas of life. So you just toss in some placeholders to create the illusion of balance.

Because they don’t matter much, you probably won’t achieve your sprinkle goals either, and it may be best that you don’t since they’d otherwise distract you from working on more meaningful goals. But even adding sprinkle goals to your goals list is generally a mistake because it creates clutter and makes you feel less accomplished. You’ll be tempted to treat them like other goals, but they’re really too malformed to be truly actionable in a meaningful way. Whether you do them or don’t do them is of little consequence.

Cautiously watch for sprinkle goals infecting your goals list, and prune them when you notice them. It’s okay to feel the void of not having a goal to cover some aspect of life such as your relationship or your self-development. Don’t race to fill that void with sprinkles. Hold out till you do the work of baking the whole cupcake.

Share Button

Using sponges to wipe out cancer

A sponge found in Manado Bay, Indonesia, makes a molecule called manzamine A, which stops the growth of cervical cancer cells, according to a recent publication in the Journal of Natural Products submitted by researchers at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) and their collaborators. Collaborators include students and investigators at the University of South Carolina (UofSC), College of Charleston, Gadjah Mada University in Indonesia and the University of Malaya in Malaysia.

The American Cancer Society estimates that there will be 13,800 new diagnoses of cervical cancer and 4,290 deaths in 2020. Though Pap tests and HPV vaccination have decreased the number of cervical cancer deaths, cervical cancer remains the fourth most common cancer in women.

The MUSC-UofSC study examined the anti-growth and cancer cell-killing effects of manzamine A in four different cervical cancer cell lines. Manzamine A stopped cervical cancer cells from growing and caused some cells to die but did not have the same effects on normal noncancerous cells.

“This is a highly exciting new application for a molecule that has earlier shown significant potential for the control of malaria and has good drug-like properties,” said Mark T. Hamann, Ph.D., the SmartState Charles and Carol Cooper Endowed Chair in Pharmacy and professor in the Department of Drug Discovery and Biomedical Sciences at MUSC. Hamann also serves as the co-senior author of the report.

“Natural products have led to the development of most of our antibiotics and anti-cancer therapies and many controls for pain,” explained Hamann.

The study’s other co-senior author, Dev Karan, Ph.D., was formerly an associate professor at UofSC before moving to the Medical College of Wisconsin, where he is an associate professor in the Department of Pathology.

In earlier work, Hamann’s group identified sponge-derived compounds effective against melanoma as well as prostate and pancreatic cancers. Manzamine A is also effective against the parasite responsible for malaria, leading to a single-dose cure in rodents. Some analogs of this unique class of drugs are candidates for the control of COVID-19, the disease caused by the new coronavirus.

In the current report, manzamine A reduced expression levels of a protein known to be highly expressed in a number of cancers, including cervical cancer, and to contribute to poorer patient outcomes.

Computer modeling showed that manzamine A shares similar structures with known inhibitors of the protein, yet manzamine A is 10 times more potent in blocking the problematic proteins.

Several patents have been filed on manzamine A, and a startup company is in the works.

Next steps are to establish its clinical relevance, according to Hamann.

“The goal now is to make sure that it works in animals and then try to advance it into clinical applications and further development,” said Hamann.

While these molecules can be synthesized in the laboratory, Hamann doesn’t think that’s the best process.

“Most of the starting materials for lab-based synthesis are derived from petroleum,” he explained. “In contrast, sponges in their natural habitat can be successfully farmed, and unlike other forms of aquaculture, clean the environment.”

Therefore, production of these molecules from sponges growing in the environment would likely be the best source while providing opportunities for economic development in rural Indonesia.

However, the potential to find new therapeutic uses like this one for natural products hinges on species diversity, according to Hamann.

“The preservation of species diversity is extremely important, as is the diversity of the chemicals they produce and the opportunities for treating cancer that they offer,” explained Hamann. “If 50 years of climate change remains unchecked, projections are that we may lose one-third of the global species diversity. So with that will go opportunities like this.”

Share Button

US modelling study estimates impact of school closures for COVID-19 on US health-care workforce and associated mortality

US policymakers considering physical distancing measures to slow the spread of COVID-19 face a difficult trade-off between closing schools to reduce transmission and new cases, and potential health-care worker absenteeism due to additional childcare needs that could ultimately increase mortality from COVID-19, according to new modelling research published in The Lancet Public Health journal.

Using the latest data from the US Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey to measure the childcare needs of health-care workers if schools are shut, researchers estimate that nationwide, at least one in seven medical workers may have to miss work to care for their children aged 3-12 years old, even after taking into account childcare provided by non-working adults and older siblings within the same household.

These additional childcare obligations could compromise the ability of the US healthcare system to respond to COVID-19 if alternative childcare arrangements are not made, researchers say.

However, the authors caution that the true impact of school closures on overall deaths from COVID-19 cannot be precisely predicted because of large uncertainties around estimates of transmission and infectivity, and to what extent a decline in the health-care workforce impacts the survival of patients with COVID-19.

“Closing schools comes with many trade-offs, and can create unintentional child-care shortages that put a strain on the health-care system,” says Professor Eli Fenichel from Yale University in the USA who co-led the research. “Health-care workers spending less time providing patient care to look after their own children can directly influence the development of an epidemic and the survival of those patients. Understanding these trade-offs is vital when planning the public health response to COVID-19 because if the survival of infected patients is sufficiently sensitive to declines in the healthcare workforce, then school closures could potentially increase deaths from COVID-19.” 

Support for mandatory school closures to reduce cases and mortality from COVID-19 comes from experience with influenza, or models that do not include the effect of school closure on the health-care workforce. Few studies have considered the trade-off between case reduction and disease burden and the potential loss of healthcare workers to childcare obligations.

In the study, researchers analysed data on more than 3 million individuals between January 2018 and January 2020 to assess family structure and probable within-household childcare options for health-care workers. They identified those most likely to require additional childcare for children aged 3-12 years old in the event of school closures by type of health-care occupation nationally and across different states, assuming that early childcare for children aged under 2 years remains open. They also modelled potential declines in the health-care workforce during school closures with estimates of case reductions from school closures to identify the point at which more lives are lost from school closures than are saved.

The analyses suggest that around 29% of US health-care workers need to provide care for children aged 3-12 years old. In households without a non-working adult or a sibling aged 13 years or older to provide care, the researchers estimate that 15% of health-care workers will require childcare — equivalent to around 2.3 million children nationwide — if schools close. However, the authors note that they were unable to account for health-care workers finding alternative methods of care for their children such as babysitters or friends.

School closures will be especially challenging for nurse practitioners (22% will need childcare), physician’s assistants (21%), diagnostic technicians (19%), and physicians and surgeons (16%), as well as nearly 13% of the nursing and home health aids who are single parents and part of the group helping the elderly with infection control in nursing homes, researchers say.

The US states likely to have the greatest unmet childcare needs include South Dakota (21% of health-care workers will need childcare), Oregon (21%), and Missouri (21%). In contrast, Washington DC (9% health-care workers with unmet childcare needs), New Mexico (10%), and New Jersey (11%) are least likely to have health-care worker shortages if schools close.

Further analysis suggests that if the case fatality fraction (the share of people who die out of all those infected) rises from 2% to more than 2.4% when the health-care workforce declines by 15%, school closures could lead to a greater number of deaths than those they prevent. However, there is substantial variation across the country. For example, in South Dakota estimates suggest that the case fatality rate must not increase by more than 1.7% before school closures stop saving lives and start increasing overall mortality, whereas in Washington DC it is 4.1% — this is due to the low child care obligations in Washington DC relative to South Dakota.

“The US healthcare system appears disproportionately prone to labour shortages from school closures, particularly among those health-care workers providing infection control in nursing homes,” says co-lead author Dr Jude Bayham from Colorado State University, USA. “These potential health-care workforce shortages should be a priority when assessing the potential benefits and costs of school closures, and alternative child care arrangements must be part of the school closure plan.” 

According to Fenichel, “Closing schools and distancing in general is about bending the curve to stay below hospital capacity and reduce COVID-19 mortality, but how we distance in order to bend the curve can also influence the hospital capacity we need to stay below. We need to account for both.”

The authors note some important limitations of the study, including that the authors informed their model based on the influenza virus, to which children are particularly vulnerable — however, early data on COVID-19 suggests children may be less vulnerable, so the benefits of school closures may be smaller than expected. On the other hand, the authors note that closing schools earlier in an outbreak could prevent more cases and lead to less health-care workers being infected and thus able to treat more patients. The study did not include mortality from other conditions that might occur if the health-care workforce declined, which should be taken into consideration when deciding about closing schools, the authors say.

Share Button

Coronavirus: Five-year-old among latest UK victims

A child with underlying health conditions is among 708 people whose deaths were reported in the past day.

Share Button

Health24.com | Vaping could up risks for asthma, COPD and other lung diseases

As if the news on vaping wasn’t bad enough, a new study suggests that e-cigarette users are also at significantly higher risk of chronic lung diseases such as asthma, bronchitis, emphysema and COPD.

Those risks rose even higher if vapers also smoked tobacco, researchers said.

E-cigarettes harmful on their own

“What we found is that for e-cigarette users, the odds of developing lung disease increased by about a third, even after controlling for their tobacco use and their clinical and demographic information,” said study senior author Stanton Glantz. He directs the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education at the University of California, San Francisco.

In the new study, Glantz’s team tracked data on the cigarette and e-cigarette use of more than 32 000 US adults, none of whom had lung disease at the start of the study.

The researchers then recorded new lung disease diagnoses over the years 2013 to 2016. Those diagnoses included such common and debilitating illnesses as asthma, bronchitis, emphysema and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD).

“We concluded that e-cigarettes are harmful on their own, and the effects are independent of smoking conventional tobacco,” Glantz said in a UCSF news release.

Current and former e-cigarette users were 30% more likely to develop chronic lung disease, while tobacco smokers had more than 2.6-times increased risk. For people who vaped and smoked, risks of developing a lung disease more than tripled.

Dual users

“Dual users – the most common use pattern among people who use e-cigarettes – get the combined risk of e-cigarettes and conventional cigarettes, so they’re actually worse off than tobacco smokers,” Glantz said. The study couldn’t prove cause and effect, however, only associations.

The new findings were published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

These findings are particularly relevant as the debate continues over whether e-cigarettes should be promoted as a “harm-reduction” tool for smokers looking to wean off traditional tobacco, the researchers said.

While they found that switching from smoked tobacco to e-cigarettes lowered the risk of developing lung disease, fewer than 1% of the smokers in the study had completely switched to e-cigarettes.

“Switching from conventional cigarettes to e-cigarettes exclusively could reduce the risk of lung disease, but very few people do it,” Glantz noted. “For most smokers, they simply add e-cigarettes and become dual users, significantly increasing their risk of developing lung disease above just smoking.”

Inhaling any foreign substance is bad

The researchers also noted that their findings are unrelated to the recent and highly publicized cases of acute lung disease linked to e-cigarette use – those were severe, sudden-onset cases that resulted in hospitalisation and death. More than 2 400 such cases have now been reported, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced on Thursday.

Instead, “this study contributes to the growing case that e-cigarettes have long-term adverse effects on health and are making the tobacco epidemic worse,” Glantz said.

Two experts in lung health who reviewed the new study said it highlights another reason to avoid vaping and smoking.

“While vaping e-cigarettes was thought to be safe [apart from nicotine addiction], this study makes it clear that vaping nicotine is associated with pulmonary diseases such as asthma and COPD,” said Dr Len Horovitz, a pulmonary specialist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City.

Dr Sameer Khanijo directs the Respiratory Care Unit at North Shore University Hospital in Manhasset, New York. He said the message is clear: “Smoking is harmful. E-cigarette use is harmful. Inhaling any foreign substance into the lungs is bad.”

Image credit: iStock

Share Button

Nurse deaths ‘inevitable’ from coronavirus

Nursing chiefs raise fears about protective equipment following the deaths of two nurses.

Share Button

Health24.com | Mom’s handbag may hold hidden dangers for kids

Busy moms and dads routinely stuff their handbag and bags with every item their family might need for the day. But that creates a minefield of choking and poisoning hazards for babies and toddlers, paediatricians warn.

A handbag, backpack or diaper bag can contain a hodgepodge of medications and supplements, cosmetics, hand sanitisers, candy, coins and other items that attract little hands. That can also set the stage for accidents, sometimes deadly.

“Young children are all inquisitive explorers,” said Dr Eric Owen Tyler, a paediatrician and executive board member of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Alabama Chapter. “And mom’s purse is like a gold mine.”

Tyler said that over the course of his career, he has seen toddlers who have swallowed iron pills or pain medications, which can damage the kidneys or liver, or cause fatal overdoses. Some have even got their hands on birth control pills.

Bags can be overlooked

The case that “really sticks with me”, Tyler said, involved a two-year-old who managed to ingest her grandmother’s heart medication. The toddler died seven days later.

Even when parents are mindful of safe medication storage in the house, bags can be overlooked. Part of the issue, Tyler said, is that bags are packed and unpacked constantly, and switched out regularly – and parents may lose track of what’s inside.

“Something you hear a lot is, ‘I just forgot it was in there,'” said Dr Elizabeth Murray, a paediatric emergency doctor with the University of Rochester Medical Center in Rochester, New York.

Keeping bags away from curious hands is the safest bet. But there are also wiser ways to pack them, according to Murray.

“We always want medications to stay in the childproof container they came in,” she said.

Injuries related to cosmetics

And make use of a bag’s various compartments, Murray advised. If a young child knows her snack or sippy cup is always in a particular place, keep it free of all other items she should not touch.

Medications are an obvious risk to youngsters. But bags often contain other, less apparent hazards, according to Tyler. Cosmetics – particularly nail polish and hair and skin care products – can draw kids’ attention and be swallowed or placed in the eyes.

Tyler cited statistics showing that between 2002 and 2016, almost 64 700 US children under age five landed in the emergency room for injuries related to cosmetics.

Meanwhile, coins, breath mints, cough drops and other small items present a choking hazard. Coins can also damage the digestive tract, Tyler noted, as can tiny button batteries found in car-key fobs.

Parents also need to be vigilant about any nicotine products, whether they be traditional cigarettes, electronic cigarettes or nicotine gum. Nicotine poisoning can make young children very ill, or even prove fatal.

Keep bags out of reach

Then there are firearms. It’s not uncommon, Tyler said, for people to carry guns or other weapons in a bag. And in recent years, news reports have highlighted tragic cases where a toddler retrieved a gun from a bag and accidentally shot himself or someone else.

Certain situations can increase the risk to toddlers, Murray said. One is during holiday gatherings, when many people are in one place and it can be hard to keep track of little ones’ every move.

Murray saw a tragedy like that play out: At a neighbour’s holiday party, her friends’ nine-month-old came across a methadone pill that had dropped to the floor, and swallowed it without anyone noticing.

Hours after putting her to bed that night, her parents found her dead. It turned out that the pill belonged to a relative who had visited the house.

Tyler said it’s critical for everyone who is around a young child to be mindful of what’s in their belongings, and to keep bags off the floor and out of reach.

Image credit: iStock

NEXT ON HEALTH24X

Share Button

Coronavirus: Can the UK do 100,000 tests a day?

The government has pledged to increase daily testing tenfold by the end of the month.

Share Button