Weighing in on the origin of heavy elements

A long-held mystery in the field of nuclear physics is why the universe is composed of the specific materials we see around us. In other words, why is it made of “this” stuff and not other stuff?

Specifically of interest are the physical processes responsible for producing heavy elements — like gold, platinum and uranium — that are thought to happen during neutron star mergers and explosive stellar events.

Scientists from the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Argonne National Laboratory led an international nuclear physics experiment conducted at CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, that utilizes novel techniques developed at Argonne to study the nature and origin of heavy elements in the universe. The study may provide critical insights into the processes that work together to create the exotic nuclei, and it will inform models of stellar events and the early universe.

The nuclear physicists in the collaboration are the first to observe the neutron-shell structure of a nucleus with fewer protons than lead and more than 126 neutrons — “magic numbers” in the field of nuclear physics.

At these magic numbers, of which 8, 20, 28, 50 and 126 are canonical values, nuclei have enhanced stability, much as the noble gases do with closed electron shells. Nuclei with neutrons above the magic number of 126 are largely unexplored because they are difficult to produce. Knowledge of their behavior is crucial for understanding the rapid neutron-capture process, or r-process, that produces many of the heavy elements in the universe.

The r-process is thought to occur in extreme stellar conditions such as neutron-star mergers or supernovae. These neutron rich environments are where nuclei can rapidly grow, capturing neutrons to produce new and heavier elements before they have chance to decay.

This experiment focused on the mercury isotope 207Hg. The study of 207Hg could shed light on the properties of its close neighbors, nuclei directly involved in key aspects of the r-process.

“One of the biggest questions of this century has been how the elements formed at the beginning of the universe,” said Argonne physicist Ben Kay, the lead scientist on the study. “It’s difficult to research because we can’t just go dig up a supernova out of the earth, so we have to create these extreme environments and study the reactions that occur in them.”

To study the structure of 207Hg, the researchers first used the HIE-ISOLDE facility at CERN in Geneva, Switzerland. A high-energy beam of protons was fired at a molten lead target, with the resulting collisions producing hundreds of exotic and radioactive isotopes.

They then separated 206Hg nuclei from the other fragments and used CERN’s HIE-ISOLDE accelerator to create a beam of the nuclei with the highest energy ever achieved at that accelerator facility. They then focused the beam at a deuterium target inside the new ISOLDE Solenoidal Spectrometer (ISS).

“No other facility can make mercury beams of this mass and accelerate them to these energies,” said Kay. “This, coupled with the outstanding resolving power of the ISS, allowed us to observe the spectrum of excited states in 207Hg for the first time.”

The ISS is a newly-developed magnetic spectrometer that the nuclear physicists used to detect instances of 206Hg nuclei capturing a neutron and becoming 207Hg. The spectrometer’s solenoidal magnet is a recycled 4-Tesla superconducting MRI magnet from a hospital in Australia. It was moved to CERN and installed at ISOLDE, thanks to a UK-led collaboration between University of Liverpool, University of Manchester, Daresbury Laboratory and collaborators from KU Leuven in Belgium.

Deuterium, a rare heavy isotope of hydrogen, consists of a proton and neutron. When 206Hg captures a neutron from the deuterium target, the proton recoils. The protons emitted during these reactions travel to the detector in the ISS, and their energy and position yield key information on the structure of the nucleus and how it is bound together. These properties have a significant impact on the r-process, and the results can inform important calculations in models of nuclear astrophysics.

The ISS uses a pioneering concept suggested by Argonne distinguished fellow John Schiffer that was built as the lab’s helical orbital spectrometer, HELIOS — the instrument that inspired the development of the ISS spectrometer. HELIOS has allowed exploration of nuclear properties that were once impossible to study, but thanks to HELIOS, have been carried out at Argonne since 2008. CERN’s ISOLDE facility can produce beams of nuclei that complement those that can be made at Argonne.

For the past century, nuclear physicists have been able to gather information about nuclei from the study of collisions where light ion beams hit heavy targets. However, when heavy beams hit light targets, the physics of the collision becomes distorted and more difficult to parse. Argonne’s HELIOS concept was the solution to removing this distortion.

“When you’ve got a cannonball of a beam hitting a fragile target, the kinematics change, and the resulting spectra are compressed,” said Kay. “But John Schiffer realized that when the collision occurs inside a magnet, the emitted protons travel in a spiral pattern towards the detector, and by a mathematical ‘trick’, this unfolds the kinematic compression, resulting in an uncompressed spectrum that reveals the underlying nuclear structure.”

The first analyses of the data from the CERN experiment confirm the theoretical predictions of current nuclear models, and the team plans to study other nuclei in the region of 207Hg using these new capabilities, giving deeper insights into the unknown regions of nuclear physics and the r-process.

In addition to conducting the experiment at CERN, the Argonne scientists informed the design of the ISS, outfitting the spectrometer with their HELIOS detectors and data acquisition electronics.

Kay is also involved in the development of another solenoidal spectrometer at the DOE sponsored Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB) at Michigan State University, called SOLARIS, contributing his expertise in nuclear physics to another cross-institutional collaboration.

The results of this study were published in an article titled “First exploration of neutron shell structure below lead and beyond N = 126” on February 13 in Physical Review Letters. The research was sponsored by the DOE’s Office of Nuclear Physics, the UK Science and Technology Facilities Council and the European Research Council.

Share Button

Coronavirus: UK measures ‘making a difference’

People are heeding the advice to stay home to keep pressure off the NHS – and it’s working, says adviser.

Share Button

Tiny optical cavity could make quantum networks possible

Engineers at Caltech have shown that atoms in optical cavities — tiny boxes for light — could be foundational to the creation of a quantum internet. Their work was published on March 30 by the journal Nature.

Quantum networks would connect quantum computers through a system that also operates at a quantum, rather than classical, level. In theory, quantum computers will one day be able to perform certain functions faster than classical computers by taking advantage of the special properties of quantum mechanics, including superposition, which allows quantum bits to store information as a 1 and a 0 simultaneously.

As they can with classical computers, engineers would like to be able to connect multiple quantum computers to share data and work together — creating a “quantum internet.” This would open the door to several applications, including solving computations that are too large to be handled by a single quantum computer and establishing unbreakably secure communications using quantum cryptography.

In order to work, a quantum network needs to be able to transmit information between two points without altering the quantum properties of the information being transmitted. One current model works like this: a single atom or ion acts as a quantum bit (or “qubit”) storing information via one if its quantum properties, such as spin. To read that information and transmit it elsewhere, the atom is excited with a pulse of light, causing it to emit a photon whose spin is entangled with the spin of the atom. The photon can then transmit the information entangled with the atom over a long distance via fiber optic cable.

It is harder than it sounds, however. Finding atoms that you can control and measure, and that also aren’t too sensitive to magnetic or electric field fluctuations that cause errors, or decoherence, is challenging.

“Solid-state emitters that interact well with light often fall victim to decoherence; that is, they stop storing information in a way that’s useful from the prospective of quantum engineering,” says Jon Kindem (MS ’17, PhD ’19), lead author of the Nature paper. Meanwhile, atoms of rare-earth elements — which have properties that make the elements useful as qubits — tend to interact poorly with light.

To overcome this challenge, researchers led by Caltech’s Andrei Faraon (BS ’04), professor of applied physics and electrical engineering, constructed a nanophotonic cavity, a beam that is about 10 microns in length with periodic nano-patterning, sculpted from a piece of crystal. They then identified a rare-earth ytterbium ion in the center of the beam. The optical cavity allows them to bounce light back and forth down the beam multiple times until it is finally absorbed by the ion.

In the Nature paper, the team showed that the cavity modifies the environment of the ion such that whenever it emits a photon, more than 99 percent of the time that photon remains in the cavity, where scientists can then efficiently collect and detect that photon to measure the state of the ion. This results in an increase in the rate at which the ion can emit photons, improving the overall effectiveness of the system.

In addition, the ytterbium ions are able to store information in their spin for 30 milliseconds. In this time, light could transmit information to travel across the continental United States. “This checks most of the boxes. It’s a rare-earth ion that absorbs and emits photons in exactly the way we’d need to create a quantum network,” says Faraon, professor of applied physics and electrical engineering. “This could form the backbone technology for the quantum internet.”

Currently, the team’s focus is on creating the building blocks of a quantum network. Next, they hope to scale up their experiments and actually connect two quantum bits, Faraon says.

Story Source:

Materials provided by California Institute of Technology. Original written by Robert Perkins. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Share Button

Health24.com | Three countries have kept coronavirus in check; here’s how they did it

Vietnam. South Korea. Taiwan.

All three countries are placed uncomfortably close to China, the initial epicentre of the coronavirus pandemic that’s now swept across the world.

But they also have one other thing in common: They’ve each managed to contain their Covid-19 infections, preventing the new coronavirus from reaching epidemic proportions within their borders.

How they did so might provide lessons to the United States and elsewhere, experts say.

Tried and true way

Reacting early was key.

South Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam each recognised the novel coronavirus as a threat from the outset, and aggressively tested suspected cases and tracked potential new infections, public health experts said.

“Finding cases and isolating them so they’re not transmitting forward – that’s the tried and true way of controlling an infectious disease outbreak, and when you analyse what was done in many Asian countries, you will find that at its core,” said Dr Amesh Adalja, a senior scholar with the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in Baltimore.

The first cases of what is now called Covid-19 appeared in Wuhan, China, in early to mid-December, linked to a live animal and seafood market located next to a major train station.

Most of the world took a watch-and-wait approach, but not Vietnam, said Ravina Kullar, an infectious diseases researcher and epidemiologist with Expert Stewardship Inc. in Newport Beach, California.

“They actually started preparing for this on 31 December 2019. They were testing on 31 December,” Kullar said. “They were proactive, and that I think is a key to preventing epidemics. They were overly cautious, and that really benefited the country.”

Authoritarian measures

Vietnamese government officials also began hosting press conferences at least once a day, where they supplied honest and forthright information about the status of the coronavirus.

“They were very open and honest with the citizens of Vietnam, and that really served them well,” Kullar said.

There have been just 153 confirmed cases in Vietnam, which has a population of more than 96 million, according to Johns Hopkins coronavirus tracking.

A lack of testing in other countries has led to the widespread implementation of authoritarian measures like lockdowns to prevent the spread of coronavirus, Adalja noted.

“If you don’t have the diagnostic testing capacity, there may be a tendency to use very blunt tools like shelter-in-place orders, because you don’t know where the cases are and where they aren’t,” Adalja said.

South Korea initiated a system of patient “phone booths” to help people get quickly and safely tested for Covid-19, Kullar said.

Lessons from the 2003 SARS epidemic

“One person at a time can enter one side of this glass-walled booth, they grab a handset, and they are connected with a hospital worker standing on the other side of the glass,” Kullar said.

Using a pair of rubber gloves set into the wall, the healthcare worker can swab the patient without potentially exposing themselves to the virus, Kullar said.

“The hospital is able to tell the patient their results within seven minutes. We don’t have anything like that at all,” Kullar said. “They had this quickly put in place in most hospitals to get patients swabbed in a way where you don’t have direct contact with a healthcare worker.”

A country of 50 million, South Korea currently has 9 241 confirmed cases of Covid-19. While cases continue to climb there, they have done so with a much more gradual slope in March after a steep spike in February.

South Korea, Vietnam and Taiwan all learned lessons from the 2003 SARS epidemic and built up their public health infrastructure to be able to immediately respond to future crises, experts said.

Just 81 miles from mainland China, Taiwan had every reason to become a hotbed of Covid-19 activity. There’s a regular and steady flow of population between the island and China.

Quick communication

But there only have been 252 confirmed cases among the island’s 23 million citizens.

As with Vietnam, Taiwan began screening passengers flying in from Wuhan as early as 31 December, according to the Asia Times.

The island expanded its screening within a week to include anyone who recently travelled to either Wuhan or the Hubei province in which the city is located.

Taiwan also instituted border controls, quarantine orders and school closures, and set up a command centre for quick communication between local governments and their citizens.

Although the United States missed its chance to head off a Covid-19 epidemic, and is well on its way to becoming the pandemic’s new epicentre, these lessons drawn from other countries could still be used to help manage infections in the months and years ahead, Adalja and Kullar said.

Public health measures like quick testing and contact tracing need to be in place and ready to go by the time states start to lift their lockdowns, Adalja said.

“There is going to be a point where we have to start thinking about how we move forward into a next phase of the response, and that will be finding cases and isolating them,” Adalja said. “As part of that, we will need to have diagnostic testing hopefully at the point of care to be able to identify those patients. We missed the early opportunity to do this, but we do have the ability to do that now as we go into a different phase of the response.”

Germany’s nursing corps

The experience in Taiwan and South Korea show that democracies can respond effectively to an epidemic, Kullar noted. And China, with its totalitarian regime, has seen no new cases of local spread in almost a week.

Another example, and a European one at that, is Germany. Although the country has the world’s fifth-highest number of confirmed cases (43 646), there only have been 239 deaths.

Kullar cited the German healthcare system as the reason why people are surviving the virus, in particular the country’s nursing corps.

“They have 13 nurses per 1 000 people, which is some of the highest than any of the other heavily affected Covid-19 countries,” Kullar said. “The higher number of nurses show that nurses are the backbone of the hospitals, especially in ICU care. They’ve made sure to really focus in on patient management and survival.”

READ | Coronavirus: Why the 14-day quarantine period?

READ | Wuhan study shows how social distancing to curb the spread of coronavirus is saving lives

WATCH | 4 Ways to prevent loneliness while social distancing 

Image credit:

Share Button

Health24.com | Coronavirus transmission: Chance of spreading through tears is very low

The new coronavirus has been identified as more infectious than the 2003 SARS virus due to the rapid rate at which it is spreading around the world.

The virus can spread through droplets expelled by coughing and sneezing, direct contact and by coming into contact with contaminated surfaces and objects, explains the World Health Organization (WHO). And more recent research has sparked curiosity around another way the virus might spread: through tears.

However, research published in the journal of the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) this week confirms that there is a very slim chance that infected patients are passing on the virus through tears.

The paper, titled Assessing Viral Shedding and Infectivity of Tears in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Patients involved eight researchers from the National University Hospital in Singapore who collected tear samples from 17 patients with Covid-19. 

Traces in eye secretions

The samples were taken from the time the patients displayed symptoms until their recovery – about 20 days later. Their research indicates that a total of 64 samples were collected over the study period (around three weeks).

Samples were also taken from the patients’ back of the nose and throat during this period, and the overall results showed that while all patients’ tears were clear of the virus, it was, in fact, detected in the nasal and throat swabs.

The team explained that the results “suggest that transmission through tears regardless of the phase of infection is likely to be low”, although they added that further research is needed into the virus transmission.

A small-scale Chinese study carried out in February found that one of 30 patients who had Covid-19 was found to have conjunctivitis, also known as pink eye.

The researchers also found traces of the virus in the patient’s eye secretions. However, a news release by the AAO explained that infection of the virus through tears is highly unlikely. 

How long can coronavirus survive on surfaces?

Although there is clarification around the transmission of the virus, it is not yet entirely certain how long it can survive on surfaces, notes the WHO, adding that it seems to behave like other coronaviruses.

This means it may persist on surfaces of a couple of hours, or up to several days. This all depends on the conditions, such as the type of surface and the temperature of the environment.

As a precautionary measure, you should clean surfaces with a disinfectant, and ensure you wash your hands thoroughly with soap and water or use hand sanitiser with an alcohol content of 60% or higher. Also, avoid touching your face as your mouth and nose are key gateways for the virus to enter your body. 

*As of 30 March 2020, there are over 1 200 confirmed cases of coronavirus and two deaths in South Africa. Find all the updates here.

WATCH | 6 handwashing mistakes that help coronavirus spread

READ MORE | Coronavirus 101 – here’s what you need to know

READ MORE | A man in China died from hantavirus and the news has caused some alarm – but what is this virus?

Image: Aliyah Jamous, Unsplash

Share Button

Coronavirus: 20,000 former NHS staff return to fight virus, PM says

In a video posted online, the prime minister says the UK can get through the pandemic “together”.

Share Button

Health24.com | Coronavirus infection likely worse for vapers and smokers

Smokers and vapers who are infected with the new coronavirus could possibly expect a more severe infection, health experts warn.

Many advisories have focused on the risk facing older people, those with chronic conditions such as diabetes, and people with compromised immune systems, such as cancer patients. But doctors also caution that users of electronic cigarettes and tobacco are more in danger from the new coronavirus than the average healthy person.

If you vape, “you’re going to make lungs more vulnerable to severe infection,” said Dr Panagis Galiatsatos, an American Lung Association spokesman who is also director of the tobacco treatment clinic at Johns Hopkins Hospital, in Baltimore.

Vaping introduces toxic chemicals that harm lung cells and change their metabolism, Galiatsatos said, and it also curbs the body’s immune system.

Higher odds of disease progression

Data from China’s coronavirus outbreak showed infected smokers and residents of cities with high levels of air pollution had more severe symptoms, he said. Galiatsatos predicted use of e-cigarettes will have the same effect.

A study of 78 patients with Covid-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China, published recently in the Chinese Medical Journal, listed history of smoking as one factor contributing to poorer patient outcomes.

Stanton Glantz, director of the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, cited that study in a recent online UCSF commentary.

“The odds of disease progression (including to death) were 14 times higher among people with a history of smoking,” he wrote, calling on the public to stop smoking and vaping, and to also steer clear of second-hand smoke.

Because vaping is a recent phenomenon, less is known about its harmful long-term effects than about smoking tobacco, which has been studied for decades.

But e-cigarettes have come under growing scrutiny since last year when more than 2 000 cases of severe lung damage and death were reported among vapers. Most of those cases were associated with products containing an additive called vitamin E acetate, and THC, the psychoactive component of marijuana, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Higher rate of hospitalisation

As cases of Covid-19 continue to spread, the consequences for smokers and vapers should soon be clear. But evidence pointing to poorer outcomes already exists.

Dr Sucharita Kher, director of the outpatient pulmonary clinic at Tufts Medical Center in Boston, said animal studies have shown e-cigarette vapour “adversely affects the lung cells’ ability to fight against a virus”.

She added that smokers also have a higher rate of hospitalisation for influenza, another viral respiratory infection.

But Kher added that the Chinese data do not prove smoking caused worse outcomes for Covid-19 pneumonia patients. They do, however, show a link. There’s much to learn about the virus, she said.

“We have to interpret it with caution,” she explained.

Vaping substances that contain THC or nicotine “definitely has short-term health consequences,” said Dr Alexa Mieses, a family doctor in Durham, North Carolina, who expects studies will eventually show similar long-term links.

Researchers know tobacco smoking has long-term consequences, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), emphysema or cancer, she said, but no long-term studies have yet been done on vaping.

A threat to overall health

“My gut … or I should say, my medical education, leads me to believe” years of e-cigarette use will eventually be linked to these or similar outcomes, Mieses said.

“First and foremost, vaping and smoking don’t just affect your respiratory system, but pose a threat to your overall health,” she said.

Mieses and Kher recommended people who wish to quit vaping contact their family doctor for help.

Kher noted that vaping has not been shown to be an effective smoking-cessation aid and e-cigarette users are more likely to become tobacco smokers. She said seven drugs have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to help people quit smoking, but there is no approved medicine for those wanting to quit e-cigarettes.

“I highly recommend they talk to their doctors and try to quit vaping or try to cut down,” she said.

READ | Coronavirus: Basic protective measures

READ | Coronavirus | Concerns about if, and how it spreads in the air? Here are the facts

READ | Undetected cases may be driving coronavirus spread

Image credit: iStock

Share Button

Coronavirus: Mercedes F1 to make breathing aid

Thousands of the devices, which deliver oxygen to the lungs without needing a ventilator, could be made.

Share Button

Coronavirus: Six months before UK ‘returns to normal’ – deputy chief medical officer

The UK faces reviews of measures every three weeks for six months or more, says deputy chief medical officer.

Share Button

Beverly Hills Rambo

Did you know that Eddie Murphy wasn’t the original choice the play the character of Axel Foley in the movie Beverly Hills Cop? That role was actually given to Sylvester Stallone, but he couldn’t get some of the comedic elements right, so Eddie Murphy was brought in to replace him.

And did you know that Clint Eastwood wasn’t going to be the original Dirty Harry? Frank Sinatra was set to play that role. Unfortunately Sinatra broke his wrist and couldn’t lift the gun, so the role went to Eastwood instead. Why couldn’t Sinatra just shoot with his other hand?

Who could forget Marty McFly from Back to the Future? That role wasn’t played by Michael J. Fox initially. The movie actually started filming with Eric Stoltz in the lead role, but he was cut after a few weeks due to not being perceived as funny enough.

Changing actors during production is costly, but it isn’t uncommon. Sometimes this happens very late into a production. British actress Samantha Morton completed her role for the movie Her, where she played the voice of the AI. But she was replaced by Scarlett Johansson during post production, meaning that the entire role was re-recorded.

Given all the money being spent by the movie industry, you might expect that they’d get these decisions right the first time and lock everything down. But the reality is that creating a film can be an evolutionary process where decisions are made and then reconsidered along the way.

Sometimes you just have to make your best guess and go forward with action. Even when you do your best to make good advance decisions, you can’t always tell how things will work out. Sometimes you’ll make costly mistakes that will be problematic to fix or redo later.

From the actor’s perspective, it sucks when you get cut, especially after putting a lot of work into a role. Stuart Townsend trained and rehearsed for two months to play Aragorn in Lord of the Rings, only to be replaced by Viggo Mortensen four days into filming. Peter Jackson concluded that Townsend looked too young for the role. Couldn’t Jackson have figured that out sooner? Maybe he could have made that choice sooner, but sometimes you don’t really know how a piece will fit till you see it in context.

Sometimes you’ll also get blindsided by what life throws at you. In the movie Aliens, the actor James Remar was originally set to play the role of Corporal Hicks, but he was arrested for drug possession, so James Cameron replaced him with Michael Biehn.

When you tackle an interesting creative or business project, problems come up along the way. It’s rare for such projects to breeze through predictably from start to finish. Sometimes you have to make difficult choices as you go.

And sometimes you’ll be the one getting cut because someone else has made that decision, or they fell into circumstances where they had little choice.

In film production such cuts and changes are ideally made to create a better movie. Of course there can be politics involved, but sometimes it’s just the right choice. It’s hard to envision a better Beverly Hills Cop than Eddie Murphy, but would you want to be the one to tell Sylvester Stallone that he wasn’t funny enough after you’ve already cast him in the role?

When you face a difficult decision to make, ask yourself what’s best for the story of your life. What’s your big picture? When you put that picture first, what decision wants to emerge? What’s the right thing to do, regardless of the implementation difficulty?

Sometimes the right decision for your story is that it’s time to cut someone from your cast. Sometimes you need to replace the script for your life. Sometimes you need to pursue different roles. And sometimes you just need to step back and trust everyone to do their jobs.

It’s easy to look at a crappy film and wonder how the studio could have released it like that. Couldn’t they tell it was going to be bad in advance? Couldn’t they see all the mistakes they were making along the way? In many cases the answer is yes, but it’s still difficult for someone to step up and make those calls. How do you cut an actor who’s been training hard for months for a role? How do you let go of a long-term career that isn’t working for you? Sometimes it’s easier just to let it go badly and hope that the next project is better.

Imagine looking at your life through the lens of being the movie director in charge of it. Do you like how the picture is progressing? Do you have the right people in the right roles to make it work? Do you need to make any cuts or changes to ensure that the film turns out well? And there any counterproductive forces at work that you need to address?

What keeps you going through all of these tough decisions? Ultimately it’s your vision for the film – or your vision for your life. You can let a variety of different forces push you one way and then another, or you can sit in the director’s chair and direct.

Share Button