Alzheimer ‘tau’ protein far surpasses amyloid in predicting toll on brain tissue

Brain imaging of pathological tau-protein “tangles” reliably predicts the location of future brain atrophy in Alzheimer’s patients a year or more in advance, according to a new study by scientists at the UC San Francisco Memory and Aging Center. In contrast, the location of amyloid “plaques,” which have been the focus of Alzheimer’s research and drug development for decades, was found to be of little utility in predicting how damage would unfold as the disease progressed.

The results, published January 1, 2020 in Science Translational Medicine, support researchers’ growing recognition that tau drives brain degeneration in Alzheimer’s disease more directly than amyloid protein, and at the same time demonstrates the potential of recently developed tau-based PET (positron emission tomography) brain imaging technology to accelerate Alzheimer’s clinical trials and improve individualized patient care.

“The match between the spread of tau and what happened to the brain in the following year was really striking,” said neurologist Gil Rabinovici, MD, the Edward Fein and Pearl Landrith Distinguished Professor in Memory and Aging and leader of the PET imaging program at the UCSF Memory and Aging Center. “Tau PET imaging predicted not only how much atrophy we would see, but also where it would happen. These predictions were much more powerful than anything we’ve been able to do with other imaging tools, and add to evidence that tau is a major driver of the disease.”

Interest in Tau Growing as Amyloid-Based Therapies Stumble

Alzheimer’s researchers have long debated the relative importance of amyloid plaques and tau tangles — two kinds of misfolded protein clusters seen in postmortem studies of patients’ brains, both first identified by Alois Alzheimer in the early 20th century. For decades, the “amyloid camp” has dominated, leading to multiple high-profile efforts to slow Alzheimer’s with amyloid-targeting drugs, all with disappointing or mixed results.

Many researchers are now taking a second look at tau protein, once dismissed as simply a “tombstone” marking dying cells, and investigating whether tau may in fact be an important biological driver of the disease. In contrast to amyloid, which accumulates widely across the brain, sometimes even in people with no symptoms, autopsies of Alzheimer’s patients have revealed that tau is concentrated precisely where brain atrophy is most severe, and in locations that help explain differences in patients’ symptoms (in language-related areas vs. memory-related regions, for example).

“No one doubts that amyloid plays a role in Alzheimer’s disease, but more and more tau findings are beginning to shift how people think about what is actually driving the disease,” explained Renaud La Joie, PhD, a postdoctoral researcher in Rabinovici’s In Vivo Molecular Neuroimaging Lab, and lead author of the new study. “Still, just looking at postmortem brain tissue, it has been hard to prove that tau tangles cause brain degeneration and not the other way around. One of our group’s key goals has been to develop non-invasive brain imaging tools that would let us see whether the location of tau buildup early in the disease predicts later brain degeneration.”

Tau PET Scans Predict Locations of Future Brain Atrophy in Individual Patients

Despite early misgivings that tau might be impossible to measure in the living brain, scientists recently developed an injectable molecule called flortaucipir — currently under review by the FDA — which binds to misfolded tau in the brain and emits a mild radioactive signal that can be picked up by PET scans.

Rabinovici and collaborator William Jagust, MD, of UC Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, have been among the first to adopt tau PET imaging to study the distribution of tau tangles in the normally aging brain and in a smaller cross-sectional study of Alzheimer’s patients. Their new study represents the first attempt to test whether tau levels in Alzheimer’s patients can predict future brain degeneration.

La Joie recruited 32 participants with early clinical stage Alzheimer’s disease through the UCSF Memory and Aging Center, all of whom received PET scans using two different tracers to measure levels of amyloid protein and tau protein in their brains. The participants also received MRI scans to measure their brain’s structural integrity, both at the start of the study, and again in follow-up visits one to two years later.

The researchers found that overall tau levels in participants’ brains at the start of the study predicted how much degeneration would occur by the time of their follow up visit (on average 15 months later). Moreover, local patterns of tau buildup predicted subsequent atrophy in the same locations with more than 40 percent accuracy. In contrast, baseline amyloid-PET scans correctly predicted only 3 percent of future brain degeneration.

“Seeing that tau buildup predicts where degeneration will occur supports our hypothesis that tau is a key driver of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease,” La Joie said.

Notably, PET scans revealed that younger study participants had higher overall levels of tau in their brains, as well as a stronger link between baseline tau and subsequent brain atrophy, compared to older participants. This suggests that other factors — likely other abnormal proteins or vascular injuries — may play a larger role in late-onset Alzheimer’s, the researchers say.

Ability to Predict Brain Atrophy a ‘Valuable Precision Medicine Tool’

The results add to hopes that tau-targeting drugs currently under study at the UCSF Memory and Aging Center and elsewhere may provide clinical benefits to patients by blocking this key driver of neurodegeneration in the disease. At the same time, the ability to use tau PET to predict later brain degeneration could enable more personalized dementia care and speed ongoing clinical trials, the authors say.

“One of the first things people want to know when they hear a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease is simply what the future holds for themselves or their loved ones. Will it be a long fading of memory, or a quick decline into dementia? How long will the patient be able to live independently? Will they lose the ability to speak or get around on their own? These are questions we can’t currently answer, except in the most general terms,” Rabinovici said. “Now, for the first time, this tool could let us give patients a sense of what to expect by revealing the biological process underlying their disease.”

Rabinovici and his team also anticipate that the ability to predict future brain atrophy based on tau PET imaging will allow Alzheimer’s clinical trials to quickly assess whether an experimental treatment can alter the specific trajectory predicted for an individual patient, which is currently impossible due to the wide variability in how the disease progresses from individual to individual. Such insights could make it possible to adjust dosage or switch to a different experimental compound if the first treatment is not affecting tau levels or altering a patient’s predicted trajectory of brain atrophy.

“Tau PET could be an extremely valuable precision medicine tool for future clinical trials,” Rabinovici said. “The ability to sensitively track tau accumulation in living patients would for the first time let clinical researchers seek out treatments that can slow down or even prevent the specific pattern of brain atrophy predicted for each patient.”

Share Button

Health24.com | How cleaner air quickly brings about big health benefits

When people are breathing cleaner air, their health generally improves – rapidly, in some cases, a new review shows.

The report, from the Environmental Committee of the Forum of International Respiratory Societies (FIRS), details some of the evidence on air quality and human health. Overall, it concludes, people can reap a range of benefits when air pollution is cut – from fewer asthma attacks, to lower risks of heart attack and stroke, to a longer life expectancy.

Changes in ‘Olympic’ cities

Some of the effects are “quite striking”, said Dr Dean Schraufnagel, the report’s lead author and executive director of FIRS. He pointed to the example of changes made in cities hosting the Olympics – which, for a time, resulted in cleaner air and healthier residents.

For the 1996 Olympic Games in Atlanta, officials bumped up public transportation and closed downtown streets to private vehicles. As a result, peak daily ozone levels dropped by 28%, and over the next four weeks, the number of city children needing medical care for asthma attacks fell by more than 40%.

Similarly, when Beijing hosted the 2008 Olympics, the Chinese national government put three-month restrictions on traffic, as well as factory emissions. Air pollution plummeted, and within two months, there were declines in doctor visits for asthma and in deaths from heart disease and stroke.

“If you stop the pollution at its source, there are huge health benefits to be had,” said Schraufnagel, who is also a pulmonologist at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

Other examples come from factory shutdowns, according to the report. When a large steel mill in the Utah Valley closed for 13 months, fine-particle pollution fell by half, and hospital admissions for asthma, pneumonia and other lung diseases declined.

A wide range of effects

And the improvements were not limited to lung disease. Premature births were reduced, as was the area’s daily mortality rate.

That brings up a bigger point, Schraufnagel said: Dirty air has a wide range of effects on the human body.

“It affects the heart, the kidneys, the brain, and it’s associated with higher risks of heart disease, stroke, diabetes, dementia and many cancers,” Schraufnagel said.

People are not always aware of how important air quality is to our health, according to Dr Meredith McCormack, a spokeswoman for the American Lung Association.

“But when you think about it, we’re breathing in air every moment of every day, and the quality of that air is important,” said McCormack, who was not involved in the review.

She called the report “very informative”, bringing together examples of how air quality changes can affect the health of people of all ages, short- and long-term.

Relatively ‘easy’ steps can help

Does it all mean factories must close and traffic must be banned in downtowns? No, Schraufnagel said. The dramatic instances noted in the report point to the power of reducing air pollution, he said, and that can be achieved through many different measures.

“A coal-fired plant could switch to natural gas, for example,” Schraufnagel said. Or old diesel-powered buses can be replaced by “cleaner” ones powered by natural gas or electricity.

Even relatively “easy” steps can help, Schraufnagel added. A study found that when school buses spent less time idling, they spewed fewer fine particles and less carbon into the air around schools.

The standard argument against tougher air quality rules is economic, Schraufnagel noted. But even there, he said, evidence favours taking action.

‘Champions of cleaner air’

The US Clean Air Act, enacted in 1970, is credited with slashing emissions of air pollutants nationally, while gross domestic product kept growing.

The US Environment Protection Agency estimates that the “monetized” health benefits of the law have exceeded the costs by a factor of 32 to 1. Those benefits, valued at $2 trillion in 2020, were mainly attributed to fewer deaths related to air pollution, according to the report.

McCormack suggested that people try to be “champions of cleaner air, indoors and outdoors”. That can include banning smoking and using less energy at home, and advocating for local and national measures to reduce air pollution.

The findings were published in Annals of the American Thoracic Society.

Image credit: iStock

Share Button

Health24.com | Give seniors a memory check at annual check-ups, experts say

Many older people show evidence of mental decline, called mild cognitive impairment, but doctors often miss this sometimes early sign of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease.

To help doctors get a better handle on their patients’ mental state, the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) is urging physicians to assess patients aged 65 and older at least once a year.

Mild cognitive impairment

The academy recommends that doctors use a mathematical tool that helps quantify their patients’ memory and thinking skills.

“Since thinking skills are the most sensitive indicator of brain function and they can be tested cost-effectively, this creates an enormous opportunity to improve neurologic care,” study author Dr Norman Foster, of the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, said in an AAN news release.

Around the world, nearly 7% of people in their early 60s suffer from mild cognitive impairment, as do 38% of those aged 85 and older, according to the AAN.

Using the new metric can alert doctors so that optimal care can be provided. Although there is no cure for mild cognitive impairment, its presence can help doctors keep watch should the patient progress to dementia.

“We cannot expect people to report their own memory and thinking problems because they may not recognise that they are having problems or they may not share them with their doctors,” Foster said.

“Annual assessments will not only help identify mild cognitive impairment early, it will also help physicians more closely monitor possible worsening of the condition,” he added.

The report was published online in the journal Neurology.

Image credit: iStock

Share Button

Trust in Human Relationships

Imagine being in a relationship with a partner you don’t trust. Would you be able to have good clarity in such a relationship?

If you don’t trust your partner, you won’t be able to trust that they’ll do what’s mutually beneficial for your relationship. This will make it harder to invest in your relationship. You’ll feel inclined to hold something back. You’ll feel a need to protect yourself against the risk of dishonesty, betrayal, harsh judgment, and so on.

But the odd truth here is that if you knew for certain that you couldn’t trust your partner, you could still experience a strong level of clarity. You wouldn’t bother investing in a trust-based relationship with such a person. You’d focus on self-preservation instead. If you knew that your partner was going to lie, cheat, and perhaps act abusively, and you grew to expect such behaviors and to tolerate them, you could still feel reasonably clear about the relationship and where you stood within it. You’d be savvy enough to learn to control and manipulate your partner instead of trusting them. There are indeed relationships like this, and they’re often fairly stable over many years, so our model of clarity must account for this.

A low-trust relationship can still be a fairly predictable one, and hence it can have relatively high clarity. Suppose, for instance, that you got into a relationship with someone for the secondary gains, such as access to a wealthy lifestyle, and you could freely admit that to yourself (even if you hid that intention from others). And suppose your partner abuses drugs regularly. If you’re honest with yourself about your reasons for being in such a relationship, and if you feel willing and able to deal with the highs and lows because you really want those secondary gains, you could actually surrender to the truth of your situation and thereby feel pretty clear about your path within the scope of that relationship.

You wouldn’t delude yourself into thinking that you have a fairy tale romance. You might put on a good show for other people, but you’d know and accept the truth of your situation. You wouldn’t be so naive as to be fooled by your partner’s frequent lying. When you felt it was important to know the truth in areas where you suspected lying, you’d conduct your own independent investigation rather than accepting your partner’s word. You’d take steps to protect yourself from potential abuse, and you’d accept it as a cost of doing business, so to speak. In a way, you’d actually trust your partner – as in trusting them to behave like a drug abuser or a scoundrel. You trust that you couldn’t trust them.

As long as you stayed aligned with the truth of your situation and didn’t pretend that it was something other than it was, you could still feel pretty clear about your journey together and where you were headed. Maintaining a cynical view of your relationship would actually serve your sense of clarity.

On the other end of the spectrum, what if you did trust your partner? This can lead to strong clarity as well. You’d make different predictions about your partner’s expectations based on trust. You could expect your partner to be honest with you. You could expect some degree of loyalty to your relationship. You could expect to be treated fairly. Your partner’s past patterns of behavior would give you good cause to form these expectations.

In either type of relationship, you could feel psychologically safe – but only if you don’t succumb to self-delusion. In the low-trust relationship, you’ll need to develop self-preservation skills in order to feel psychologically safe. In the high-trust relationship, you could achieve psychological safety through feelings of love and caring.

At these extremes we can have good clarity, but what about the gray area in the middle?

You can still achieve decent clarity when you’re not at the extremes, as long as you seek to align your expectations with reality. What muddies your sense of clarity is when you cross the streams. Try to blend a high-trust relationship with lots of suspicion. Or try to combine a low-trust relationship with an unrealistic presumption of honesty. That’s going to pollute your sense of clarity because your expectations will be out of alignment with reality.

Expect human beings to behave like human beings, which means that sometimes they’ll behave like heroes and sometimes like villains. It’s reasonable to expect that in the world of humans, you’ll encounter some dishonesty, cheating, cruelty, and other human foibles. Humans have been practicing such behavior for millennia. To assume that your life will somehow be devoid of such issues isn’t likely to match up with reality. Life isn’t all rainbows and unicorns, but nor is it all zombies and pirates.

Within this expectation comes a deep level of forgiveness, not just of other people but of yourself. When you accept that other human beings will sometimes behave chaotically, it helps you accept this about yourself.

I share this as someone who has walked in the world of villains and in the world of heroes, and I’ll tell you that villains have their heroic moments, and heroes have their villainous moments. We are all – at our core – infested with human chaos. And this is part of the beauty and magic of life.

To deny the presence of this chaos is to reduce your sense of clarity. It makes no sense to deny what you’ve seen and experienced so often and can reasonably expect to be part of your reality in the future. But if you can accept the chaos and even learn to love it and to play with it, especially in your human relationships, you can stroll through the world of humans while maintaining a strong feeling of centeredness and psychological safety, even as the world throws you for a loop now and then. You may not be able to predict the events of each day, and you’ll often be surprised, but you can predict that if you embrace and accept the chaos, you’ll be in for a fun ride.

Share Button

Health24.com | How you could make the most of your baby’s first 3 years

Experts agree that the first three years of a baby’s life are a unique time of fast development.

Even though a newborn seems helpless, he or she is learning every minute, absorbing information through all five senses. That’s why babies will try to put everything possible in their mouths. It’s a way of understanding as well as exploring.

Early connections

Baby also learns from repeated experiences, so, for instance, every time you soothe him when he cries and cuddle him to show affection, he feels a sense of security and trust that assists with his emotional development.

Singing and reading to an infant has strong positive influences on baby’s brain and development, even though she doesn’t yet know the actual meaning of the words. It’s the sound of your voice that makes the connection, so you can read aloud from a book you’re reading for your own pleasure or even verbalise the directions when assembling baby’s new chest of drawers.

A great online resource is Zero to Three, a non-profit organisation whose mission is to ensure that babies and toddlers benefit from the early connections that are critical to their well-being. Its website offers information on all aspects of baby’s development, arranged into three- to six-month segments from birth to three years. You can read about the skills and behaviours babies develop at every stage and how you can nurture them. You’ll also find parenting tips and activities to strengthen the bond between you and your baby.

Image credit: iStock

NEXT ON HEALTH24X

Share Button

Could relatives of measles virus jump from animals to us?

A group of viruses, of which measles is one, are adept at jumping to species barrier.

Share Button

Are your friends bad for your health?

We tend to copy the way our friends and family behave, potentially leading us to put on weight or even divorce.

Share Button

Take the Great British Intelligence Test: How clever are you?

Scientists are exploring the limits of brain power and they want your help.

Share Button

Smokers past and present ‘live in more pain’

Smokers and ex-smokers who have quit report being in more pain than people who have never smoked.

Share Button

Balsall Common couple raise £1m for stillbirth support

Ryan and Amy Jackson set up the Lily Mae Foundation after losing their daughter a decade ago.

Share Button