Is This Why King Charles Stopped Short Of Apologising For Colonialism In Kenya?

King Charles notably stopped short of apologising for colonialism during an emotive speech on Tuesday in Kenya, prompting a wave of criticism.

But there may be a reason for that – here’s what you need to know.

Why are people calling for an apology?

Kenya was colonised by Britain for decades, one of many countries which were considered part of the British Empire.

When its citizens started to call for independence in 1952, insurgents called the Mau Mau started a rebellion, triggering a wave of violent suppression from British forces and the introduction of a state of emergency the same year.

This “emergency” saw Britain force 1.5 million Kenyans suspected of being part of the Mau Mau rebellion into concentration camps. This lasted from 1952 and 1960, when the state of emergency was lifted.

The country declared its independence from Britain in 1963, 11 years after Charles’ mother Queen Elizabeth II had taken to the throne.

So a royal apology during Charles’ first state visit to a Commonwealth country, ahead of Kenya’s 60th anniversary of independence, has been seen as apt for some.

Ahead of the royal visit, the Kenyan Human Rights Commission said that only “an unconditional and unequivocal public apology” for Britain’s colonial abuses – along with compensation – would be enough.

Why did King Charles not apologise for colonialism?

He, like his mother, is a constitutional monarch. As the Royal Family’s official website explains, this means “the ability to make and pass legislation resides with an elected parliament”, even though the sovereign is head of state.

And the sovereign “no longer has a political or executive role”, but continues to act as “a focus for national identity, unity and pride”.

Apologising for colonialism would err away from the official line the British government toes, therefore breaching his apolitical position.

Even when the UK offered £20 million of compensation to more than 5,000 Kenyans in 2013 after they suffered under colonial authorities during the state of emergency, then foreign secretary William Hague stopped short of an apology.

He just said the UK “sincerely regrets” its actions.

Neil Wigan, the UK high commissioner to Nairobi, told a local radio station last week a royal apology would take the King into “difficult legal territory”.

Britain's King Charles III (CL) meets with Kenyan marathon runner Eliud Kipchoge (L) and other Kenyan runners during a visit to Karura Forest in Nairobi on November 1, 2023.
Britain’s King Charles III (CL) meets with Kenyan marathon runner Eliud Kipchoge (L) and other Kenyan runners during a visit to Karura Forest in Nairobi on November 1, 2023.

TONY KARUMBA via Getty Images

So what did Charles say during his visit?

On his first state visit to a Commonwealth state since he inherited the throne, the monarch expressed his “deepest regret” at the “unjustifiable acts of violence” the British forces carried out against Mau Mau rebels in the 1950s.

He said: “There were abhorrent and unjustifiable acts of violence committed against Kenyans,” by the colonial forces, therefore triggering a “painful struggle for independence and sovereignty”.

He added: “For that there can be no excuse.”

The King continued: “In coming back to Kenya, it matters greatly to me that I should deepen my own understanding of these wrongs, and that I meet some of those whose lives and communities were so grievously affected.

“None of this can change the past. But by addressing our history with honesty and openness we can, perhaps, demonstrate the strength of our friendship today. And, in so doing, we can, I hope, continue to build an ever-closer bond for the years ahead.”

Kenya's President William Ruto welcoming Charles to Kenya
Kenya’s President William Ruto welcoming Charles to Kenya

via Associated Press

How did Kenya respond?

His words were welcomed by Kenya’s president William Ruto who said the monarch was a “veteran visionary”.

He told Charles he appreciated the monarch’s “expression of willingness to acknowledge the painful aspects of our shared history” and praised “his exemplary courage and readiness to shed light on uncomfortable truths”.

Ruto said: “This is a highly encouraging first step, under your leadership, to deliver progress beyond tentative and equivocal half measures of past years.”

However, the president also called for “full reparations”, and said “much remains to be done” to achieve this.

Others such as David Ngasura, a historian from the Talai clan in western Kenya, told Reuters news agency that “acknowledgement alone is not enough”.

He said: “I am yet to hear him about compensation and reparations by the British government to the victims of historical injustices meted by the British colonial government.”

Share Button

Boris Johnson Believed Old People Should ‘Accept Their Fate’ And Catch Covid

Boris Johnson wanted old people to “accept their fate” and catch Covid so that the young could get on with their lives, it has been revealed.

The former prime minister also suggested that he agreed with Tory MPs who believed the virus was “nature’s way of dealing with old people”.

The shocking revelations were contained in former chief scientific adviser Patrick Vallance’s diaries, which have been made public by the Covid Inquiry.

It also emerged yesterday that a former aide to Johnson believed the former PM had asked “why are we destroying the economy for people who will die anyway soon” in the early days of the pandemic.

Writing in his diary on August 28 2020, Vallance said: ”[Johnson] is obsessed with old people accepting their fate and letting the young get on with life and the economy going. Quite a bonkers set of exchanges.”

In a further entry on December 12 that year, said: ”[Johnson] says his party ’thinks the whole thing is pathetic and Covid is just nature’s way of dealing with old people – and I am not entirely sure I disagree with them.”

Lib Dem leader Ed Davey said: “This inquiry is painting a clear picture of a Conservative Party totally unfit to govern our country.

“Every shocking revelation is another devastating blow to the families who lost loved ones to Covid. It is hard to hear how badly Conservative ministers failed them, our NHS and our country.”

Natalie Grayson, national officer for care at the GMB union, said Johnson’s remarks “reveal the utter contempt his government showed to people living and working in care homes”.

“Care workers long suspected ministers were treating the lives of the elderly and vulnerable as less valuable than others,” she said.

“Emergency workers, care workers, residents and their families are the ones who have had to live with the trauma of the government’s failure. Boris Johnson is a disgrace.”

Share Button

Gaza Civilians Now Deciding ‘Where Do We Want To Be When We Die’

Civilians trapped in Gaza are now deciding “where do we want to be when we die”, a British MP who has family in the territory has said.

Lib Dem Layla Moran said on Sunday that “nowhere in Gaza is safe”, as Israel conducted its military operation in response to the October 7 Hamas attack.

“The conversion in Gaza now I’m afraid to say has changed. No longer are people saying, where do we go to be safe,” she told the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme.

“The question they are now asking is, where do we want to be when we die?”

Moran’s mother is Palestinian and father is British and some of her extended family have been sheltering in a church in Gaza since a Israeli bomb hit their house.

She said it had been “torturous” not to be able to contact them after phone and internet connections were cut.

“I can’t tell you wha that did to us as a family,” Moran said. “Not knowing if they were dead or alive.”

Moran, the Lib Dem foreign affair spokesperson, said the UK government was essentially “sanctioning” the Israeli action and called for a ceasefire.

On October 7 Hamas attacked Israel from Gaza, killing 1,400 people and taking around 230 hostages.

In response, Israel has launched an intensive bombing campaign in Gaza and a broader ground invasion is expected.

Share Button

Despite Calling Hezbollah ‘Very Smart,’ Trump Remains Loved Among Jewish Republicans

LAS VEGAS — Despite having praised the anti-Israel group Hezbollah as “very smart” and disparaging Israeli leaders just days after an attack that killed well over a thousand people in the country, Donald Trump nevertheless received a hero’s welcome Saturday at the Republican Jewish Coalition’s annual conference.

Trump, the eighth and final speaker at a forum of 2024 GOP presidential candidates, got a lengthy standing ovation before he even said a word in a massive ballroom at The Venetian Resort on the Las Vegas Strip.

“I love Israel,” he said to cheers. “I love Israel.”

Over the next half-hour, the former president ticked off all the things he had done for the country and encouraged Israel to wipe out Hamas, whose members carried out the Oct. 7 assault, while criticizing U.S. President Joe Biden’s calls for Israel to restrain its retaliatory strikes to avoid harming civilians.

“Every single life that is lost in this conflict is on the shoulders of Hamas alone,” Trump said to more cheers.

Matt Brooks, the Republican Jewish Coalition’s CEO, said he understood why attendees gave Trump a pass on his comments, considering Trump’s “incredible pro-Israel record” during his four years in office. “His record is unblemished on this,” Brooks said.

Ari Fleischer, a press secretary in the George W. Bush White House and a member of the group’s board of directors, said most Jewish Republicans still back Trump. “He shouldn’t have said it,” Fleischer said of Trump’s comments. “But his record is so strong and so good, he still has a deep pool of goodwill.”

Trump’s remarks praising Hezbollah came just four days after Hamas, the Gaza-based militant group, killed more than 1,400 people in Israel, according to the country, with another 200 taken hostage. “You know, Hezbollah is very smart. They’re all very smart,” Trump told his West Palm Beach audience in a speech that also denigrated Israeli military officials and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Trump, who as president reversed several U.S. policies to encourage Netanyahu to do as he pleased, soured on the Israeli leader after he called to congratulate Biden after the 2020 election. Trump falsely claimed then, and continues to falsely claim now, that he actually won.

While attendees at the annual summit said they were irked by Trump’s remarks, many said they would not hold them against him as he seeks the 2024 GOP nomination because, as president, he moved the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, supported the building of even more Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank territory, recognized Israel’s annexation of the Golan Heights, and helped broker a normalization treaty between Israel and multiple Arab countries.

“There is nobody who did more for Israel than Trump,” said Sinan Gursoy, a cardiologist in Naples, Florida, as he downplayed Trump’s previous remarks. “This is his style. People have got to get used to it.”

Biden’s campaign, meanwhile, pointed to Trump’s comments as an example of the sort of rhetoric that Americans grew weary of during his presidency. “The simple truth is, Trump’s erratic attacks on Israel are par for the course for a man who undermined our national security and embarrassed our nation on the world stage,” said campaign spokesperson T.J. Ducklo. “The more Trump speaks, the more voters are reminded just how dangerous and unfit to lead he is.”

Among Trump’s rivals for the 2024 GOP nomination, though, only former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley criticized Trump. She said that in a time of conflict in Israel and Russia’s continuing assault on Ukraine, the United States could not afford another Trump presidency.

“We cannot have four years of chaos, vendettas and drama. Eight years ago it was good to have a leader that broke things. Now we need a leader that knows how to put things back together,” she said. “America needs a captain that will steady the ship, not capsize it. And Republicans need a candidate who can actually win.”

Share Button

Keir Starmer Has A ‘Grip’ On Labour Despite Gaza Ceasefire Divisions, Say Shadow Minister

Keir Starmer still has a “grip” on Labour despite a growing revolt over his refusal to call for a ceasefire in Gaza, one of his close allies has said.

But Peter Kyle, the shadow science minister, refused to say whether the Labour leader would sack members of his frontbench team who defied him.

Starmer has only called for a humanitarian pause in the war, stopping short of demanding a full ceasefire.

On Sunday morning 13 members of his own frontbench team had so far called for a ceasefire.

London mayor Sadiq Khan, Manchester mayor Andy Burnham and Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar have done the same.

Speaking to the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme, Kyle attempted to play down the significance of the divisions.

“We are united in sympathy in what is unfolding there and impacting civilians,” he said.

“People are calling for a ceasefire. We are calling for a pause. So we can dance on the head of a pin.”

Ceasefires tend to be long-term and designed to deescalate a conflict and pave the way for a political solution.

While humanitarian pauses can last just hours to enable aid to be delivered and are often confined to a small area rather than the entire conflict zone.

Kyle said: “Keir has been listening to people with both perspectives in the party and has turned it into a set of policy announcements and calls that would make a tangible difference on the ground.

“Keir is doing so, leading in a way which has strength, it has absolutely firm policies which are implementable and in line with the international community right now.

“That shows he has a grip on our party, yes we are having a debate and Keir is engaged in that debate. Don’t ever doubt his leadership ability.”

Asked if Starmer would sack shadow ministers who publicly differed with him on policy, Kyle said: “What he is going to do, I suspect, is to continue to engage with them.”

Members of a political party’s fronbench team are usually expected to abide by collective responsibility and not voice opposition to the leader’s policies.

In July last year Starmer removed Labour MP Sam Tarry as a shadow transport minister for making up policy “on the hoof”.

“That can’t be tolerated in any organisation because we have got collective responsibility,” the Labour leader said at the time.

On October 7 Hamas attacked Israel from Gaza, killing 1,400 people and taking around 230 hostages.

In response, Israel has launched an intensive bombing campaign in Gaza and a ground invasion is expected.

Share Button

Seth Meyers Unearths ‘Amazing’ Old Video Of ‘Sheepish’ Donald Trump

Seth Meyers on Thursday contrasted the “blustery, unhinged” figure that former President Donald Trump cuts in public to the Trump “who only exists when he’s under oath” and under threat of perjury.

Trump when testifying is “suddenly much calmer, he’s more restrained, you could even say sheepish,” noted the Late Night comedian.

To prove the point, Meyers aired a video deposition from the future president in a 2016 lawsuit. In the clip, Trump answers questions in a respectful tone.

“That footage is amazing,” said Meyers. “It’s like watching the neighbourhood Rottweiler who’s always terrorising the mailman suddenly mope around in a cone.”

“Like in public he’s a raving lunatic screaming shit like, ‘Radical woke Democrats are using windmills and secret satellites to kill Christmas’ and then under oath he’s practically Emily Post,” he added.

It’s because under oath is “the only place Trump faces consequences,” explained Meyers, who later noted how the ex-POTUS’ latest outburst against a court staffer in his civil fraud trial — in violation of a gag order which banned him from doing so — saw him slapped with a $10,000 (£8,256) fine.

Watch Meyers’ full monologue here:

Share Button

US Confirms It Has Sent Artillery Previously Meant For Ukraine To Israel

The US has confirmed that shells originally intended to aid Ukraine in its war against Russia have now been sent to Israel amid its conflict with the Palestinian militants, Hamas.

Reports that tens of thousands of artillery shells – specifically 155mm projectiles – previously earmarked for Ukraine, were being redirected to Israel started circulating last week.

And on Monday, a US senior defence official confirmed some had indeed been re-routed.

The unnamed official told journalists that “prior to the October 7 Hamas terrorist attack, some 155[mm shells] had been withdrawn from the war reserve stockpile in Israel, to replenish US stocks in Europe”.

The New York Times has previously reported that the US had been moving munitions, potentially up to 300,000 shells, from Israeli storage to Ukraine since 2022.

But, as the official noted, there’s now been a U-turn in the Pentagon, following the outbreak of war in the Middle East.

They said: “Much of that has been redirected and provided to the Israel Defence Forces for their use.”

The Pentagon had been keeping munitions in Israel as an emergency in case of war in the region or as a resource for other US allies.

The US does not formally need Israel’s consent to move such items, but local officials confirmed they had it anyway – from then-prime minister Yair Lapid’s –when looking to transport the munitions to Ukraine.

As Reuters noted in January, if such transfers had happened under current PM Benjamin Netanyahu’s watch, it may have stretched his budding relationship with Russia.

Now, munitions have been redirected back to Israel – even though Ukraine still has more than 1,000km of active frontline to fight.

Ukraine’s minister for strategic industries, Oleksandr Kamyshin, told POLITICO on Monday that the Israel-Hamas war showed the West needs to increase its arms production.

“The free world should be producing enough to protect itself. That’s why we have to produce more and better weapons to stay safe,” Kamyshin said.

Back in the US media briefing on Monday, journalists asked the Pentagon representative why weapons were going to Israel, even though the White House has regularly emphasised how much munition Ukraine needs.

The official said the US is “assessing US stocks globally and what can be made readily available to the needs of Israel as well as Ukraine”, before adding: “Also the United States can walk and chew gum at the same time.

“So we’re going to continue to ensure that Ukraine has what it needs to defend its territory. And at the same time we’re ensuring that Israel has what it needs. Two very different operational environments with different levels of need and consultation. And we’re continuing to prioritise both.”

The change follows a domestic split in US politics about just how much funding and weaponry Washington DC should continue to send to Kyiv more than 18 months after Russia first invaded.

As Nikolay Kozhanov, a consulting fellow at the Russia and Eurasia Programme of think tank Chatham House told HuffPost UK, the conflict in the Middle East works to Russia’s advantage as a means to distract the West from the Ukraine war.

The Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov claimed in his own press briefing on Tuesday that the West’s ability to keep supplying Ukraine was limited, according to Sky News.

It’s worth remembering that are some complicated international politics at play between the two wars, too.

Since the Hamas massacre on October 7 and the following war between Gaza and Israel, Ukraine has sided with Tel Aviv.

Meanwhile, Russia has reiterated its support for a Palestinian state, after years of trying to build a friendship with Israel. Moscow is openly calling for a ceasefire, too.

The Israel-Hamas war is threatening to spill into a regional conflict – a fight which began in the Gaza Strip, has already led to many deaths in West Bank – and the war in Ukraine is expected to continue for some time yet.

Share Button

Critics Bring The Receipts Over Trump’s New Claim About Sidney Powell

Donald Trump is suddenly claiming Sidney Powell was never his attorney, but reporters and social media users were quick to jog his memory.

The former president posted on Truth Social on Sunday morning that the election-denying lawyer “WAS NOT MY ATTORNEY, AND NEVER WAS.”

The post followed Thursday’s news that Powell had reached a deal with Fulton County prosecutors handling the Georgia racketeering case against Trump and 17 others over an alleged plot to change the state’s 2020 election results.

Powell pleaded guilty to six misdemeanours related to intentionally interfering with an election.

In exchange for her cooperation with prosecutors, Powell must serve six years of probation, pay a fine of $6,000 (£4,940) and write an apology to Georgia residents.

Over on X (formerly Twitter), people promptly pointed out someone who contradicts Trump’s latest version of events: Trump, in 2020.

Trump announced in a tweet on November 15, 2020, that Powell had joined his “truly great” legal team, weeks after losing the election to YS President Joe Biden, as the Washington Post’s Aaron Blake noted.

Trump’s former personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, who led the legal charge to overturn the 2020 results, also made comments explicitly to the contrary.

At a now-infamous press conference on November 19, 2020, Giuliani introduced himself, Powell and others as members of Trump’s legal team, saying, “We’re representing President Trump and we’re representing the Trump campaign.”

Powell testified under oath before the House January 6 committee that Trump had asked her to be “special counsel to address the election issues.”

Video of that moment from her deposition was shown at one of the panel’s congressional hearings last year.

Some people, including HuffPost’s SV Dáte, also noted that if Trump claims Powell was never his attorney, then that means he was never entitled to attorney-client privilege — a tidbit that prosecutors might find useful.

See some of the other posts about Trump’s claim below:

Share Button

Michael Gove Delays Scrapping No-Fault Evictions In Face Of Major Tory Rebellion

Michael Gove has delayed plans to end no-fault evictions after dozens of Tory MPs threatened to vote against it.

The levelling up secretary said the changes – which were promised in the Conservatives’ election manifesto – would not go ahead until reforms were made to the way courts handle so-called “Section 21” cases.

But Labour accused him of striking a “grubby deal” with Tory MPs to avoid an embarrassing backbench rebellion.

Gove’s climbdown was revealed in a letter to MPs ahead of a Commons debate on the Renters Reform Bill.

In it, he said ministers will “reform the courts before we abolish section 21”.

Shadow levelling up secretary Angela Rayner said: “The government has betrayed renters with this grubby deal with the Tory backbenches.

“The Conservatives’ long-promised ban on no-fault evictions has majority and cross-party support across the House, but this flip-flop kicks it into the long grass.

“Having broken the justice system, they are now using their own failure to indefinitely delay keeping their promises to renters in the most underhand way.”

She added: “Tens of thousands more families who the government promised to protect, now face the prospect of being threatened with homelessness or kicked out of their homes by bailiffs.”

A spokesman for Rishi Sunak this morning insisted the government was still committed to ending no-fault evictions, but could not guarantee that it will happen before next year’s general election.

He said: “We think that this is an important commitment. Equally, it’s right that the right provisions are in place.”

One of the Tory rebels, Marco Longhi, told LBC: “The consequences of this well-meaning legislation is a reduction in supply as landlords continue to leave the market.

“Where will these tenants go at a time of huge demand? This is an inflationary measure that will make things worse for tenants.”

Share Button

‘Are You In Denial?’: Robert Jenrick Mocked Over His Response To Tory By-Election Defeats

A Tory minister was asked if he was “in denial” after he tried to play down the significance of the party’s latest by-election disasters.

Robert Jenrick insisted “the public are undecided” about Labour, despite their seismic victories last Thursday.

The Conservatives lost in Tamworth despite having a majority of nearly 20,000, while Keir Starmer’s party managed to overturn a 25,000 majority in Nadine Dorries’ former seat of Mid Bedfordshire.

But appearing on the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme this morning, Jenrick, who is the immigration minister, insisted Rishi Sunak is “making good progress” on his promises to voters, which he said were in tune with people’s priorities.

Presenter Victoria Derbyshire replied: “It doesn’t seem to be having any effect though if you look at what happened in Tamworth and Mid Beds.

“In Tamworth Labour overturned a majority of almost 19,000, in Mid Beds a majority of 25,000.”

Jenrick said: “With all due respect I wouldn’t read too much into by-elections – governments tend to lose by-elections.”

But Derbyshire hit back: “They are massive majorities with double digit swings – are you in denial?”

The minister replied: “I think we all have to listen to what the voters are saying in those by-elections, but we also shouldn’t read too much into them.

“My sense is that the public are undecided, they’re certainly not sold on Keir Starmer.”

Derbyshire interrupted: “Labour just won those two by-elections.”

Jenrick said: “The key thing for us as a party right now is not to worry about party politics but to deliver on the public’s priorities.”

Derbyshire then asked Jenrick how worried he was about losing his own seat of Newark, where he has a majority of 21,816.

“It would be foolish to be complacent – we all need to work hard and be good constituency members of parliament every day,” he said.

Share Button