Boris Johnson wants schools in England to be the last sector to close in any future local lockdowns.
Category Archives: Nutrition
Ass-Kicking Frames

Here’s a really simple idea that can be useful for self-motivation.
Sometimes our frames are too flabby, giving us lots of leeway to drop the ball and slack off. In such cases it may be useful to adopt harsher frames, at least temporarily, to demand more from ourselves.
Here are some of these ass-kicking frames to consider:
- Worrying = dumb
- Quitting = dishonorable
- Sleeping past 5am = loser
- Not asking for the date = spineless
- Clinging to a partial match = creepy
- Tolerating Trump supporters = suffering fools
I think such frames are best when linked closely to actions and behaviors, not to more complex results like income. They can be helpful when facing quick do or don’t decisions, like: Get up now, or sleep in late.
Imagine your alarm going off in the morning, and you’re tempted to sleep in. Then an inner voice kicks in and exclaims: Sleeping in is for losers! Get your ass up now!
Or suppose you catch yourself worrying about something you can’t control, and you remind yourself: Worrying is a stupid waste of energy!
While I’m not suggesting that you beat yourself up here, I do think there’s room for using such frames judiciously without risking damage to your self esteem.
Challenging yourself in this way can actually be fun and motivating. I know it’s not for everyone, but for some people it helps. It’s a tool – use it if you like it. Try it if you think it has promise.
You can even connect this practice with memorable movie lines if you like, such as these:
- On your feet, soldier! – The Terminator
- Get your ass to Mars! – Total Recall
- I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I’m all out of bubblegum. – They Live
- Pain don’t hurt. – Roadhouse
- I feel the need, the need for speed. – Top Gun
- I know kung fu. – The Matrix
- You can’t handle the truth! – A Few Good Men
- Freedom! – Braveheart
- I pity the fool. – Rocky III
- Wake up, time to die. – Blade Runner
- Game over, man! – Aliens
- I have had it with these motherfucking snakes on this motherfucking plane! – I hope you can guess this one. 😉
Even if the words of a line don’t quite fit your situation, that isn’t important. The emotion of the frame is what matters. “Get your ass to Mars!” may not fit your context, but if you remember the movie, you may remember the urgency of the line, right before bullets start flying. The emotion of this frame may be more effective than a more rational frame but emotionally flabby frame that makes it easy to slack off or quit on yourself.
There are so many good framing lines just in the movie The Princess Bride:
- Inconceivable!
- Death first!
- I can cope with torture.
- As you wish.
- We are men of action. Lies do not become us.
- Humiliations galore!
- Have fun storming the castle!
- It would take a miracle.
- Life is pain.
- Get used to disappointment.
- To the pain!
- Morons.
If you remember how the characters said these lines, you can summon some fun and engaging emotions that help you get into action. I especially love the “I can cope with torture” framing for facing unpleasant tasks. And I recently use the “Death first” line as a response when someone asked what it would take for me to eat something non-vegan. I wish I could use the “I am not left-handed” line from that movie too, but I actually am left-handed.
Are you kicking your own ass enough? If not, then stop using emotionally flabby frames, and get your ass to Mars!
Health24.com | Yet another study finds vaccines to be safe
- According to a new review, vaccines are an extremely safe way to protect human health
- This is thanks to strict, continuous safety monitoring
- However, many people still won’t get a coronavirus vaccine, even if it proves safe and effective
Vaccines remain a “remarkably safe” way to protect human health, thanks to a rigorous system of safety monitoring that continues after approval, a new review shows.
Ongoing safety monitoring led to safety-related label changes in 25 out of 57 vaccines approved by the US Food and Drug Administration over a two-decade period, mostly related to the vaccine’s effect on specific groups of vulnerable people, an Israeli research team found.
“This report is the most comprehensive study of post-marketing vaccine safety published, and it shows that vaccines are remarkably safe, and that the current vaccine approval and post-marketing surveillance processes are robust and effective,” said senior researcher Dr Daniel Shepshelovich, of Tel Aviv University’s Sackler School of Medicine.
Adverse event reporting system
Vaccine hesitancy among Americans has been highlighted as a potential problem in the nation’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic, with some experts concerned that too many people simply won’t get a coronavirus vaccine even if one proves safe and effective.
“The current Covid-19 outbreak makes us further appreciate the importance of safe and effective vaccines against infectious diseases,” said Dr Daniel Mackey, a paediatrician with CHOC Children’s in Orange, California.
“As the world races to create a vaccine against Covid-19, we will now, more than any other time in recent history, be dependent on a robust vaccine adverse event reporting system to ensure that the chosen vaccines are safe for the greater population,” he said.
For the study, Shepshelovich and his colleagues tracked the progress of 57 vaccines that were FDA-approved between January 1996 and December 2015.
Researchers found that 25 of the vaccines had a total of 58 safety-related label changes that occurred following the approval.
Intestinal obstruction
More than a third of the label changes involved specific groups of people that were found to be potentially at a higher risk of health problems related to specific vaccines – for example, immune-compromised patients, pregnant women or preterm infants, Shepshelovich said.
Another 22% of label changes involved allergic reactions to vaccines, researchers reported. Most of these allergies related to latex used in the packaging.
Only one vaccine was withdrawn from the market, a rotavirus vaccine that increased the risk of an intestinal obstruction, researchers found.
“A timely alarm was sounded, and the vaccine was quickly removed from use,” Mackey said.
Robust studies
Overall, the safety monitoring data “represents an excellent track record, probably reflecting the professionalism and diligence of the personnel involved in the development, approval and regulation of vaccines,” Shepshelovich concluded.
Flu vaccines were found to have the fewest post-approval safety issues, with only three of 21 influenza vaccines requiring a label change, compared with 22 of 36 other vaccines.
“It’s important for people who have vaccine hesitancy to see that there are robust studies out there that support the use of vaccines,” said Dr Amesh Adalja, a senior scholar with the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in Baltimore.
“These are rigorously tested, and even after something is approved we’re continuing to track the safety of that vaccine,” he noted. “It really should give people who worry about vaccine safety a lot of confidence about how robust the process is for assessing the safety of these vaccines.”
The new study was published in the Annals of Internal Medicine.
Image credit: iStock
NHS protest by nurses and health staff over pay rise ‘snub’
Hundreds march in Cardiff, Swansea, Bridgend and Merthyr claiming they missed out on latest award.
Your #1 Priority May Lead You Astray

While it’s good to set goals and establish priorities, there’s a risk when you become myopically focused on a single outcome.
Single mindedness can be okay for a while if you’re progressing nicely, but if you’ve gotten stuck and the needle isn’t moving, this stuckness can prevent you from making progress in any area of life. And that can really make you feel trapped or stagnant.
Have you ever seen the following issues in yourself or someone else?
- Still needing to lose weight being used as an excuse not to invest in social life or relationships
- Long-term troubles with financial scarcity or chronic health problems postponing meaningful lifestyle improvements
- Misaligned relationships delaying entrepreneurial pursuits
- Still living with one’s parents being used a reason not to date
Have you ever told yourself that you really, really have to fix one particular area of life before you can properly improve another area of life?
I’ve definitely done that before. I did it when I was broke. I did in my first marriage. I did it when I was feeling out of alignment with my first business. I repeatedly fell into the trap of obsessing over areas of life that were stuck, and somehow that made the stuckness even worse.
Sometimes it’s really hard to make forward progress in your area of greatest stuckness, even when you make that area your #1 priority. Sometimes it just won’t budge no matter how much force and effort you apply.
This can be immensely disheartening and draining. In particular, I found it super draining to keep trying to fix my finances when I was broke. I only fixed this area by shifting my attention to different parts of life that eventually led to good solutions for that stuck area.
I see similar patterns in others who keep trying to force progress in an area that isn’t progressing.
What’s the solution?
Give up… at least for a while. Surrender that stuck area to stagnation. Go invest what little energy you have left in some other area of life that you’ve been neglecting.
You’ll probably be astonished at how quickly you can make progress in a different area of life that isn’t being choked by the same degree of stuckness.
Maybe your finances are terrible right now, but you might make serious progress in your health and fitness at this time. Or switch your focus to having fun for a week or two.
Maybe you’re stuck with health problems, but you could potentially make wonderful improvements in your social life if you give it more attention (at least online at this time). A richer and more aligned social life could actually help you become healthier.
Many people, including me, have found that it’s when we give up and go attend to some other aspect of life, we finally start progressing in our primary area too – often in ways we never would have predicted.
I’m not entirely sure why this is – it just works so damned well though.
We could use the Law of Attraction frame and say that shifting focus elevates your vibe, and that helps get the stuck energy flowing again. We could say it’s due to stress reduction or a confidence boost. We could say it’s due to freeing up mental resources and thereby restoring your problem solving abilities. We could say that there’s a social effect, where more people may notice that you’re not such a Debbie Downer anymore, and now they’re happier to connect with you and bring you aligned opportunities and invitations.
How we explain this isn’t what’s most important here – use whatever frame you like as long as it gets you moving in some other direction. Just try to be open-minded about the possibility for non-linear progress. Realize that there are multiple potential reasons why it may be wise to shift your focus away from your #1 priority for a while.
There’s a good chance you already sense this instinctively. Do you notice a subtle voice nudging you to shift focus away from your stuck area? Do you think there may be a part of you that knows that the path to a solution requires some lateral movement first?
I know it can be hard to rationally explain to other people why you should shift gears. It’s like owing money to a gangster. You can’t justify that the best way to pay them back is for you to take a break from focusing on your finances for a few weeks. You may feel like you’ll lose your kneecaps if you go that route.
Try not to create that type of relationship within yourself though. Realize that breaking away from your #1 priority may be an intelligent and rational choice, even if your inner gangster doesn’t trust that it will work. At some point you have to face the hard truth that you’re not progressing and that continuing down the same path isn’t magically going to start working in the next week or two.
I’ve stumbled upon some of the most amazing advancements on my path of personal growth from lateral exploration. Here are some examples:
- Volunteering in a nonprofit association helped me learn what I needed to make my first business profitable.
- Going to Disneyland for 30 days in a row helped spawn the idea for Conscious Growth Club.
- Attending a Hay House conference (mostly on spiritual topics) helped me change careers from game development to personal development.
- Blogging about that same conference (but in a different year) led to a book deal and later speaking at that very same conference – twice.
- Doing my first workshop led to meeting Rachelle, with whom I’ve shared a wonderful 10+ year relationship, including tons of travel adventures.
- Doing a joint-venture business deal eventually led to an invitation to join the Transformational Leadership Council, which gave me dozens of growth-oriented friends along with more travel adventures.
- Getting into international speaking led to some wonderful social and romantic experiences.
Getting stuck happens. Staying stuck is a choice.
Sometimes the energy doesn’t want to flow forward. Sometimes it wants to flow sideways. Maybe from a multidimensional perspective, sideways for you is actually forward in the grand scheme of life, the universe, and everything.
Recognize when the energy isn’t flowing in the direction you expect, and go look for where it does want to flow. Stop exhausting yourself with tiresome paddling, and find the current again.
Don’t be stubborn when you get stuck. Get back in tune with the possibility space. Stay humble, and remind yourself that you don’t know everything. Sometimes the fastest route forward is exactly where you don’t expect to find it.
Chemist’s new process fast-tracks drug treatments for viral infections and cancer
Discovering antiviral and anticancer drugs will soon be faster and cheaper thanks to new research from Simon Fraser University chemist Robert Britton and his international team.
For the past 50 years, scientists have used humanmade, synthetic and nucleoside analogues to create drug therapies for diseases that involve the cellular division and/or the viral reproduction of infected cells. These diseases include hepatitis, herpes simplex, HIV and cancer.
But, says Britton, “That process has been intensive and challenging, limiting and preventing the discovery of new drug therapies.”
Now, using the new process, scientists can create new nucleoside analogues months earlier than with the previous method, paving the way for quicker drug discoveries. A paper on this research was published today in the journal Science.
“The reduction in time and cost of synthesis will vary, depending on the individual nucleoside analogue, but we have examples where we cut a 20-plus step synthesis, which takes several months to complete at the very least, down to three or four steps, which would only take a week or so,” says Britton.
“This is clearly a critical factor when it comes to treating newly evolved viruses like SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19).”
The team shortened the process by replacing naturally occurring carbohydrates typically used for synthesising these types of drugs.
“This entirely new approach builds in opportunities to diversify these drug scaffolds and should inspire new and unusual nucleoside analogue drug discoveries,” says Britton.
The team also replaced naturally derived chiral materials with achiral materials since they are generally cheaper and more versatile.
L.-C. Campeau, Merck’s head of process chemistry and discovery process chemistry says, “One of our priorities is identifying problems limiting the speed of drug discovery and development, especially regarding synthesizing custom nucleoside analogues. We are very excited to collaborate with Professor Britton in establishing new methods to access this therapeutically important class of molecules.”
Britton is also an investigator with GlycoNet, a Canada-wide network of researchers working to further our understanding of the biological roles of sugars.
The three-year project was funded by GlycoNet and Merck, patent pending.
Story Source:
Materials provided by Simon Fraser University. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.
Deep-sea misconceptions cause underestimation of seabed-mining impacts
A new publication on the impacts of deep-seabed mining by 13 prominent deep-sea biologists, led by University of Hawai’i at M?noa oceanography professor Craig Smith, seeks to dispel scientific misconceptions that have led to miscalculations of the likely effects of commercial operations to extract minerals from the seabed.
The deep sea, ocean depths below 650 feet (200 metres), constitutes more than 90% of the biosphere, harbors the most remote and extreme ecosystems on the planet, and supports biodiversity and ecosystem services of global importance. Interest in deep-seabed mining for copper, cobalt, zinc, manganese and other valuable metals has grown substantially in the last decade and mining activities are anticipated to begin soon.
“As a team of deep-sea ecologists, we became alarmed by the misconceptions present in the scientific literature that discuss the potential impacts of seabed mining,” said Smith. “We found underestimates of mining footprints and a poor understanding of the sensitivity and biodiversity of deep-sea ecosystems, and their potential to recover from mining impacts. All the authors felt it was imperative to dispel misconceptions and highlight what is known and unknown about deep seabed mining impacts.”
In addition to the impacts of mining on ecosystems in the water above extraction activities, as detailed in another UH-led study published last month, Smith and co-authors emphasize deep-seabed mining impacts on the seafloor, where habitats and communities will be permanently destroyed by mining.
“The bottom line is that many deep-sea ecosystems will be very sensitive to seafloor mining, are likely to be impacted over much larger scales than predicted by mining interests, and that local and regional biodiversity losses are likely, with the potential for species extinctions,” said Smith.
The scope of mining impacts from full scale mining, however, will not be well understood until a full-scale mining operation is conducted for years. The geographic scale and ecosystem sensitivities to mining disturbance occurring continuously for decades cannot be simulated or effectively studied at a smaller scale, according to the authors.
“All the simulations conducted so far do not come close to duplicating the spatial scale, intensity and duration of full-scale mining,” said Smith. “Further, the computer models use ecosystem sensitivities derived from shallow-water communities that experience orders of magnitude higher levels turbidity and sediment burial (mining-type perturbations) under natural conditions than the deep-sea communities targeted for mining.”
Much of the planned deep-seabed mining will be focused in the Pacific Ocean, near Hawai’i, and also near Pacific Island nations. Hawai’i and Pacific Island nations are likely to particularly suffer from any negative environmental impacts, but may benefit economically from deep-seabed mining, creating a need to understand the trade-offs of such mining.
“Polymetallic-nodule mining (as currently planned) may ultimately impact 500,000 square kilometers of deep seafloor in the Pacific, an area the size of Spain, yielding perhaps the largest environmental footprint of a single extractive activity by humans,” said Smith. “Addressing the misconceptions and knowledge gaps related to deep-sea mining is the first step towards effective management of deep-seabed mining.”
The researchers aim to work closely with regulators and society to help manage deep-seabed mining and emphasize the need to proceed slowly with seabed mining until impacts are fully appreciated.
Story Source:
Materials provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa. Original written by Marcie Grabowski. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.
Curious clues in war between bacteria in cystic fibrosis patients
Several different kinds of bacteria can cause lung infections in people with cystic fibrosis (CF). Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which can cause pneumonia, typically infects infants or young children and persists for life, while Burkholderia cepacia complex species only infect teenagers and adults. Although Burkholderia infections are rare, when they do take hold, they are deadly. Now, UNC School of Medicine scientists led by Peggy Cotter, PhD, professor in the UNC Department of Microbiology and Immunology, have discovered a reason for this pathogen’s apparent age discrimination.
This research, published in the journal Cell Host & Microbe, shows that both Pseudomonas and Burkholderia use toxic weaponry, called Type VI Secretion Systems (T6SS), to compete with and establish dominance over each other. It’s possible that scientists could target, or mimic, this weaponry to defeat the bacteria before they cause irreparable harm to lungs of patients.
Scientists have wondered for a long time why Burkholderia does not infect infants and young children. First author and former Cotter Lab graduate student Andrew Perault, MPH, PhD, designed and conducted experiments to show that Pseudomonas bacteria isolated from infants and young children use their harpoon-like T6SS to fire toxins at, and kill, competitor bacteria, including Burkholderia.
“This may be one of the reasons Burkholderia does not take root in young patients,” Cotter said. “Andy showed that although Burkholderia also produce T6SSs, they cannot effectively compete with Pseudomonas isolates taken from young CF patients.”
However, as those Pseudomonas bacteria adapt to living in the lungs of CF patients, they lose their ability to produce T6SSs and to fight with Burkholderia. The Burkholderia, using their own T6SSs, are then able to kill the Pseudomonas and establish infection.
“We believe the findings of our study, at least in part, may explain why Burkholderia infections are limited to older CF patients,” Perault said. “It appears that as at least some strains of Pseudomonas evolve to persist in the CF lung, they also evolve to lose their T6SSs, and hence their competitive edge over Burkholderia, which are then free to colonize the respiratory tract.”
The scientists think the Burkholderia T6SS is an important factor promoting the ability of these pathogens to infect CF patients. Therefore, researchers could potentially develop therapeutics to target these secretion systems to prevent infections.
Moreover, assessing the T6SS potential of resident Pseudomonas populations within the CF respiratory tract may predict susceptibility of patients to potentially fatal Burkholderia infections.
Story Source:
Materials provided by University of North Carolina Health Care. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.
Predicting drought in the American West just got more difficult
People hoping to get a handle on future droughts in the American West are in for a disappointment, as new USC-led research spanning centuries shows El Niño cycles are an unreliable predictor.
Instead, they found that Earth’s dynamic atmosphere is a wild card that plays a much bigger role than sea surface temperatures, yet defies predictability, in the wet and dry cycles that whipsaw the western states. The study, published Monday in Science Advances, is a detailed assessment of long-term drought variability.
The findings are significant for water management, agriculture, urban planning and natural resources protection. Recent droughts have claimed many lives and caused damaging crop losses, making drought forecasting a high priority. Meanwhile, the West faces rapid population growth at the same time that forecasts show dry times ahead due to global climate change.
“The main finding is not terribly hopeful for short-term drought prediction,” said Julien Emile-Geay, a study author and associate professor of Earth sciences at the USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences. “We found that, historically speaking, year-to-year droughts in the western United States were less predictable than previous studies have claimed.”
New study examines 1,000 years of droughts in the West and beyond
Emile-Geay and postdoctoral scholar Michael Erb, who is lead author from USC and now at Northern Arizona University, joined with other scientists at the University of Washington and Columbia University to produce the study.
The researchers set out to answer the question: What determines droughts in the West?
They examined North American droughts and global conditions spanning more than 1,000 years. Megadroughts, which lasted decades, and dry spells predate the Industrial Revolution, American expansion on the continent or European colonialism. For example, a megadrought in the late 13th century likely contributed to the dispersal of the Anasazi people.
The prevailing explanation is that the El Niño-Southern Oscillation plays a key role in these drought episodes. The oscillation is a two-sided coin based on water conditions in the eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean. El Niño conditions occur when sea temperatures in the region are warmer than normal and are associated with wet years in the American Southwest; La Niña conditions occur when water is cooler than normal and are associated with dry years in the Southwest.
But the scientists found that rule of thumb didn’t jibe well with all drought cycles of the past. While it’s true there’s a correlation between La Niña and drought, these ocean water conditions accounted for only about 13% of the variability, the study says.
“La Niña proved to not be the only game in town,” Emile-Geay said. “La Niña is part of the game, but not the biggest part.”
A notable example of this phenomenon occurred in 2015-16, an El Niño year when Southern California did not receive the increased precipitation that was predicted. Instead, the relief came unexpectedly the following year, a La Niña year that should have been drier than normal.
What other variables can lead to drought?
The scientists also examined other drought influencers, including water temperatures in the Atlantic Ocean and volcanic activity. While those phenomena can influence drought conditions, they are too weak or episodic to explain many droughts.
Instead, the study says droughts can originate in the atmosphere. The air around Earth is highly dynamic and influenced by more variables than the ocean alone.
“The atmosphere creates a lot of variations in moisture supply on its own, and it can cook up droughts all by itself, without being told what to do by the ocean,” Emile-Geay said.
But while the past is key to the future, it does not hold all the keys. In the future, research says carbon emissions will continue to trap heat and warm the surface, and the West will experience increasingly dry conditions as a result.
“Our study suggests that the atmosphere will continue to add a strongly unpredictable element to moisture conditions in the southwestern United States, on top of drying induced by global warming,” Emile-Geay said. “That is, the Southwest is headed for a drier future overall but with the atmosphere adding a wildcard that may, at times, make things better or worse for the people and ecosystems that depend on that water.”
The study integrates numerous sources of information spanning centuries to support the findings. The dataset, called the Last Millennium Reanalysis, aggregates climate models, modern temperature measurements and nearly 3,000 climate proxies, such as tree rings, corals, and ice cores. The reanalysis was developed by scientists at USC, the University of Washington and the University of Colorado, with the support of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. According to the NOAA, the reanalysis aimed to “transform the ways in which the climate community investigates low-frequency climate.”
Coronavirus: Face covering use expanded in England and Scotland
The new rules apply to cinemas, museums and places of worship as more quarantine restrictions start.


