Yet Another U-Turn As Labour Backs Down Over Farmers’ Inheritance Tax

The government has U-turned on its plans to launch an inheritance tax raid on farmers.

After months of intense backlash and protests in Westminster, Labour has increased the threshold – the point at which inhertance tax would apply on large farm estates – from land worth £1 million to those worth £2.5 million when it is introduced in April.

The new plan will also permit spouses to pass on £5 million of assets between them before they have to pay the inheritance tax.

This means the total number of estates impacted will drop from 375 to 185 – and the U-turn could cost around £130 million.

It comes after prime minister Keir Starmer told a Commons committee hearing last week that he had been told of farmers with terminal illnesses who were planning to kill themselves before the new rules came in to avoid the tax.

Environment secretary Emma Reynolds claimed the government’s change of heart came about after listening to those within the agriculture community.

She said: “Farmers are at the heart of our food security and environmental stewardship, and I am determined to work with them to secure a profitable future for British farming.

“We have listened closely to farmers across the country and we are making changes today to protect more ordinary family farms. We are increasing the individual threshold from £1m to £2.5m which means couples with estates of up to 5m will now pay no inheritance tax on their estates.

“It’s only right that larger estates contribute more, while we back the farms and trading businesses that are the backbone of Britain’s rural communities.”

But the new U-turn has caused frustration from those within Labour, too.

One MP told HuffPost UK: “Another hill we’ve been forced to climb only to be marched back down again. This government is like being stuck in a room with ‘The Thick of It’ on repeat.”

A rural Labour MP said the government had been “dragged along to do the bare minimum”.

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch described the U-turn as a “big win for the Conservative Party’s campaign against Labour’s Family Farm Tax.”

She added: “This fight isn’t finished. Other family businesses are still affected by Labour’s tax raid, and we will keep pushing until the tax is lifted from them too. But today is an important win, and proof that standing up for what’s fair, even when the odds are against us can make a real difference.”

Reform’s deputy leader Richard Tice also pounced on the government’s flip-flopping.

He said: “Labour’s tax raid on family farms has already been a disaster for the sector, plunging countless farmers into despair, with heartbreaking reports of some taking their own lives in order to save their farms for future generations.

“This cynical climbdown – whilst better than nothing – does little to address the year of anxiety that farmers have faced in planning to protect their livelihoods. Even with the raised threshold, many family farms will still face crippling bills. With British agriculture hanging by a thread, the government must go further and abolish this callous farms tax.”

The Lib Dems’ rural affairs spokesperson, Tim Farron, said: “It is utterly inexcusable that family farmers have been put through over a year of uncertainty and anguish since the government first announced these changes.

“Liberal Democrats were the first to call out and oppose the unfair family farm tax in last years Budget and we have been proud to stand alongside our farming communities to campaign against it ever since. This concession has been hard won, and I am so grateful to all the farmers who have fought tirelessly to achieve this.

“This is about justice and security – if we undermine British farming then we also undermine our ability to provide us with the food we need to keep us secure in an uncertain world.

“Yet many family farms will still find themselves financially crippled and barely making the minimum wage.

“We demand that the government scraps this unfair tax in full and if they refuse to, Liberal Democrats will submit amendments in the new year to bring it down.”

Share Button

No 10 Tells Protesting Farmers Controversial Inheritance Tax Policy Will Not Be Changed

The government will not U-turn on controversial changes to inheritance tax rules for farmers, No.10 has confirmed.

Keir Starmer’s official spokesman ruled out any climbdown as thousands of farmers, many of them driving tractors, once again descended on Westminster to protest against the policy.

Some of the placards on display read “No farmers, no food” and “Starmer Farmer Harmer”.

Rachel Reeves announced in the Budget that farms worth more than £1 million will become liable for the charge, albeit at the reduced rate of 20%.

Farmers’ leaders have warned that the move – which ministers say is necessary to help fill a £22 billion financial black hole left by the Tories – will put many farms out of business.

But asked if there could be a re-think on the inheritance tax changes, the PM’s spokesman said: “No. We have been clear that we understand the strength of feeling about the changes, but we are clear that this will only affect a small number of estates.

“Three-quarters of estates will be unaffected by these changes. But the government’s commitment to farmers is steadfast.”

He said the Budget had also seen the government pledge £5 billion-worth of support for farmers “which is already starting to land in farmers’ pockets”.

The spokesman added: “We recognise the strength of feeling, but we are committed to supporting our farmers, delivering rural economic growth and boosting Britain’s food security.”

Tom Bradshaw, the head of the National Farmers Union, had earlier told MPs that he feared some elderly farmers could commit suicide as a result of the policy.

If a farm is passed on to another family member, it is not subject to inheritance tax if the original owner lives for another seven years.

But giving evidence to the rural affairs committee, Bradshaw broke down in tears as he said: “Those people who are either in ill health or don’t believe they are going to be able to live for seven years may well decide that they shouldn’t be here on April 26.

“No policy should ever be published that has that unintended side-effect.”

Share Button

Rachel Reeves Tells Farmers There Will Be No U-Turn On Inheritance Tax Changes

Rachel Reeves has warned farmers preparing to take part in a mass anti-government protest that there will be no U-turn on controversial changes to inheritance tax rules.

The chancellor announced in last month’s Budget that farms worth more than £1 million which are handed down to a family member after the owner dies will be subject to 20% inheritance tax rather than zero, as is the case at present.

Farmers say that will put many of them out of business, and will make their feelings known at a lobby of MPs in Westminster on Tuesday, which has been organised by the National Farmers’ Union.

Thousands more are expected to join a separate rally in Whitehall.

Celebrities including TV presenter and farmer Jeremy Clarkson – who told The Times in 2021 that avoiding inheritance tax was “critical” in his decision to buy land – are expected to join the rally.

But in a joint-statement with rural affairs secretary Steve Reed ahead of the demos, Reeves said: “With public services crumbling and a £22 billion fiscal hole that this government inherited, we have taken difficult decisions.

“The reforms to agricultural property relief ensure that wealthier estates and the most valuable farms pay their fair share to invest in our schools and health services that farmers and families in rural communities rely on.”

The pair said farmers were “the backbone of Britain”, and said the government is investing £5 billion into farming over the next two years.

But NFU president Tom Bradshaw said: “There’s a complete disillusionment and distrust, and feeling of betrayal, that [the government] doesn’t understand food production or even want to understand food production.

“Farmers are cross, they’re worried, they feel they’ve nothing to lose, I don’t know where this ends. I don’t believe the government have any choice but to rethink this policy.”

Share Button