‘Controversial brain surgery stopped my migraines’

A woman who defied mainstream advice to have risky brain surgery says her symptoms have gone.

Share Button

‘We’re attacked and abused as we try to save lives’

Almost 45,000 assaults were recorded by ambulance services across England over the last five years.

Share Button

Research on neurodegeneration in spider brain leads neuroscientists to groundbreaking new discovery in Alzheimer’s-affected human brains

Researchers from Saint Michael’s College and the University of Vermont have made a groundbreaking new discovery that provides a better understanding of how Alzheimer’s disease develops in the human brain.

Guided by previous research of spider brains, the scientists uncovered evidence of a “waste canal system” in the human brain that internalizes waste from healthy neurons. They discovered that this system can undergo catastrophic swelling, which leads to the degeneration of brain tissue, a hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease.

With over 50 million affected people worldwide, Alzheimer’s disease is among the leading causes of death in the U.S.

The findings, which have been published by The Journal of Comparative Neurology, offer a compelling new explanation for commonly described brain pathologies observed in Alzheimer’s disease, including amyloid-beta plaques, tau tangles, and spongiform abnormalities.

Supported by the Vermont Biomedical Research Network (VBRN), the research was carried out in collaboration among Dr. Ruth Fabian-Fine (Saint Michael’s College, UVM Robert Larner, M.D. College of Medicine), Dr. John DeWitt (UVM Robert Larner, M.D. College of Medicine, UVM Medical Center), Dr. Adam Weaver (Saint Michael’s College), and Saint Michael’s undergraduate research students Abigail Roman and Melanie Winters, both members of the Class of 2025.

“The Vermont Biomedical Network has been thrilled to support Dr. Fabian-Fine’s research from its initial focus on animal neuroscience to the more recent and potentially groundbreaking emphasis on the cellular basis of human neurodegeneration,” said UVM’s Dr. Christopher Francklyn, the Director of VBRN. “Her exciting work, and the outstanding training she has provided to her undergraduate co-investigators, epitomizes what NIH hopes to accomplish with its national IDEA program.”

Neuroscientist Dr. Fabian-Fine and her team initially investigated the underlying causes for neurodegeneration in Central American wandering spiders that suffer from conditions similar to degenerative diseases in humans. Because the spider neurons were a larger size, the scientists were better able to observe their brain functions. They quickly discovered a waste-internalizing glial canal system that undergoes structural abnormalities in degenerating spider brains, which leads to uncontrolled depletion and death of brain cells.

This discovery prompted Fabian-Fine, a Vermont Center for Cardiovascular and Brain Health Pipeline Investigator, to explore whether a similar system could be found in both rodent and human brain tissue, so she teamed up with neuropathologist Dr. DeWitt at UVM’s Larner College of Medicine. The collaborative undertaking led the scientists to gather overwhelming evidence that neurodegeneration in human and rodent brains may have similar underlying causes compared to those observed in spider brains. The scientists’ report outlines possible underlying causes for neurodegeneration that may offer a promising new avenue for drug development that can address the structural abnormalities that lead to neurodegeneration.

Dozens of student researchers at Saint Michael’s College contributed to the multi-year research that provided the foundation for this breakthrough. Experiments occurred at Saint Michael’s College, the University of Vermont Medical Center, and at the UVM’s Center for Biomedical Shared Resources.

Share Button

Study in neurosurgery patients reveals numerical concepts are processed deep in ancient part of brain

New research reveals the unique human ability to conceptualize numbers may be rooted deep within the brain.

Further, the results of the study by Oregon Health & Science University involving neurosurgery patients suggests new possibilities for tapping into those areas to improve learning among people bedeviled by math.

“This work lays the foundation to deeper understanding of number, math and symbol cognition — something that is uniquely human,” said senior author Ahmed Raslan, M.D., professor and chair of neurological surgery in the OHSU School of Medicine. “The implications are far-reaching.”

The study published today in the journal PLOS ONE.

Raslan and co-authors recruited 13 people with epilepsy who were undergoing a commonly used surgical intervention to map the exact location within their brains where seizures originate, a procedure known as stereotactic electroencephalography. During the procedure, researchers asked the patients a series of questions that prompted them to think about numbers as symbols (for example, 3), as words (“three”) and as concepts (a series of three dots).

As the patients responded, researchers found activity in a surprising place: the putamen.

Located deep within the basal ganglia above the brain stem, the putamen is an area of the brain primarily associated with elemental functions, such as movement, and some cognitive function, but rarely with higher-order aspects of human intelligence like solving calculus. Neuroscientists typically ascribe consciousness and abstract thought to the cerebral cortex, which evolved later in human evolution and wraps around the brain’s outer layer in folded gray matter.

“That likely means the human ability to process numbers is something that we acquired early during evolution,” Raslan said. “There is something deeper in the brain that gives us this capacity to leap to where we are today.”

Researchers also found activity as expected in regions of the brain that encode visual and auditory inputs, as well as the parietal lobe, which is known to be involved in numerical and calculation-related functions.

From a practical standpoint, the findings could prove useful in avoiding important areas during surgeries to remove tumors or epilepsy focal points, or in placing neurostimulators designed to stop seizures.

“Brain areas involved in processing numbers can be delineated and extra care taken to avoid damaging these areas during neurosurgical interventions,” said lead author Alexander Rockhill, Ph.D., a postdoctoral researcher in Raslan’s lab.

Researchers credited the patients involved in the study.

“We are extremely grateful to our epilepsy patients for their willingness to participate in this research,” said co-author Christian Lopez Ramos, M.D., a neurosurgical resident at OHSU. “Their involvement in answering our questions during surgery turned out to be the key to advancing scientific understanding about how our brain evolved in the deep past and how it works today.”

Indeed, the study follows previous lines of research involving mapping of the human brain during surgery.

“I have access to the most valuable human data in nature,” Raslan said. “It would be a shame to miss an opportunity to understand how the brain and mind function. All we have to do is ask the right questions.”

In the next stage of this line of research, Raslan anticipates discerning areas of the brain capable of performing other higher-level functions.

In addition to Raslan, Rockhill and Lopez Ramos, co-authors include Hao Tan, M.D., Beck Shafie, Maryam Shahin, M.D., Adeline Fecker, Mostafa Ismail, Daniel Cleary, M.D., and Kelly Collins, M.D., of OHSU; and Caleb Nerison, D.O., now of Lexington Medical Center in South Carolina.

Share Button

Record efficiency: Tandem solar cells made from perovskite and organic material

Trying to improve the efficiency of solar cells to become independent from fossil energy sources is a major goal of solar cell research. A team around the physicist Dr. Felix Lang from the University of Potsdam, Prof. Lei Meng and Prof. Yongfang Li from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, now combine perovskite with organic absorbers to form a record-level tandem solar cell as reported in the scientific journal Nature.

Combining two materials that selectively absorb short and long wavelengths, e.g., blue/green and red/infrared parts of the spectrum, makes the best use of our sunlight and is a well-known strategy to increase efficiency in solar cells. Best red/infrared absorbing parts of solar cells so far were, however, made from traditional materials, such as silicon or CIGS (copper indium gallium selenide). Unfortunately, these require high processing temperatures, and thus exhibit a relatively high carbon footprint.

In their work, now published in Nature, Lang and colleagues combine two emerging solar cell technologies, namely perovskite and organic solar cells, that both are processed at low temperatures with a low carbon footprint. Achieving a record level of 25.7 % efficiency for this new combination, however, was not easy, says Felix Lang: “This was only possible by combining two major breakthroughs.” First, Meng and Li synthesized a novel red/infrared absorbing organic solar cell that extends its absorption even further into the infrared. “Still, tandem solar cells were limited by the perovskite layer, which shows strong efficiency losses if adjusted to absorb only blue/green parts of the sun spectrum,” he explains. “To tackle this, we utilized a novel passivation layer applied to the perovskite that reduces material defects and improves the performance of the whole cell.”

Share Button

Major Shock As MPs Back Move To Change The Voting System For Elections

MPs have backed a bill calling for a change in the voting system for elections.

In a major shock, the Elections (Proportional Representation) Bill was backed by 138 votes to 136.

The bill, in the name of the Lib Dem MP Sarah Olney, calls for the current first past the post system to be replaced by a form of PR.

She said: “This is a historic day in the fight for fairer votes and I am grateful to all the MPs who backed it.

“Trust in our political system is broken following years of the Conservative Party riding roughshod over standards in public life.

“Fixing our broken electoral system, introducing fair votes, and making sure everyone’s voice matters is the best way to rebuild this trust.

“Today, as we have done for a century, Liberal Democrats are leading the fight for fair votes and making sure that no one can be ignored in our democracy.

“The government must now listen to the will of the House, make time for the legislation and make fairer votes a reality and we will be holding their feet to the fire to make this happen.”

However, a spokesman for the prime minister said: “There are no plans for proportional representation or reforms to the voting system.”

Unless the government makes time for the bill at second reading, which it appears unlikely to do, the bill will fall.

A breakdown showing how MPs voted this afternoon showed Labour is split over the issue, with 59 of the party’s MPs voting for it and 50 voting against.

During the Commons debate on the bill, Tory MP Lewis Cockington suggested British voters may struggle to understand PR, despite it being used in other countries around the world.

He said: “It cannot be denied that voters would be confronted with a far more complicated system if any type of proportional representation were to be introduced.”

In a referendum on introducing the alternative vote method of PR in 2011, 68% of voters supported sticking with the current system.

Share Button

Why Are We Still Talking About The Elgin Marbles?

The Elgin Marbles – and the debate over which country owns them – are in the spotlight yet again after Keir Starmer met with his Greek counterpart in Downing Street today.

The artefacts, known as the Parthenon Sculptures in Greece and housed in the British Museum, have been a source of tension between the two countries for decades, as Athens is keen to have them back.

While Downing Street said the topic would not be on the leaders’ agenda during Tuesday’s meeting, a former advisor to the Greek government claimed a deal for returning the items was “close”.

It comes a year after Rishi Sunak created a diplomatic incident when he cancelled a meeting with the Greek PM over the artefacts.

Here’s what you need to know about the sculptures, – and why this topic probably is not going away any time soon.

What are the Elgin Marbles, and why are they so controversial?

The sculptures, first carved 2,500 years ago, were brought to Britain in the 19th Century by British ambassador Lord Elgin.

He removed them from the Parthenon on the Acropolis in Athens, reportedly with permission from the Ottoman authorities, who had ruled the city for 400 years at that point.

About half the surviving marble works are in London and the rest remain in a purpose-built museum under the Acropolis in Athens.

Greece says they were stolen but the British Museum claims they were legally obtained.

Greece has been fighting to retrieve them for years, and first put in a request for London to return the sculptures in 1983, but it was rejected the following year.

However official negotiations have been in progress since 2021, and the British Museum is reportedly considering a special loan agreement with Greece.

The institution’s chair, former Tory chancellor George Osborne, has openly said he is looking for ways to display the marbles in Greece.

And, according to YouGov, 53% of Brits think they should be returned to Greece while only 24% think they should be kept in the UK.

However, the British Museum is legally unable to give up ownership of the sculptures due to the 1963 British Museum Act, which prevents any objects being removed permanently from the institution.

Greece has previously suggested that it will not agree to a loan as that would be admitting the Museum owns the marbles.

What happened between Sunak and Mitsotakis last year?

Then PM Rishi Sunak chose to cancel his meeting with the Greek prime minister lKyriakos Mitsotakis last year after he suggested they could discuss ownership of the marbles.

The Tories remained adamant that they did not want the marbles to leave the museum – however, Sunak’s decision to scrap the face-to-face sparked a diplomatic row.

According to Bloomberg, Mitsotakis said in a statement: “I express my annoyance for the fact that the British prime minister cancelled our scheduled meeting just hours before it was due to take place.

“Greece’s positions on the issue of the Parthenon Sculptures are well known. I was hoping to have the opportunity to discuss them with my British counterpart as well, along with the major challenges of the international situation: Gaza, Ukraine, climate crisis, migration.”

Sunak’s spokesman told reporters: “We have no plans to change our approach and certainly we think that the museum is the right place for them.

“I haven’t asked him specifically about short-term or new ideas that have been put forward, but I think he’s been fairly robust on his position.”

What does Greece say now?

Mitsotakis has been clear that retrieving the marbles is still of great importance for him.

As he told the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme in 2023: “It’s as if I told you that you would cut the Mona Lisa in half, and you will have half of it at the Louvre and half of it at the British Museum, do you think your viewers would appreciate the beauty of the painting in such a way?

“Well, this is exactly what happened with the Parthenon sculptures and that is why we keep lobbying for a deal that would essentially be a partnership between Greece and the British Museum but would allow us to return the sculptures to Greece and have people appreciate them in their original setting.”

He was expected to resume his calls for retrieving the marbles after meeting Starmer in November last year.

A former adviser to Greek’s government – Professor Stamatoudi – told the BBC on Tuesday that a deal on the marbles was “close” but she was not sure if it was “close enough”.

She said Greece had offered a “cultural, strategic partnership” where they would send something else to the museum in exchange for the marbles – although negotiations around what it could be remain “secret”.

What does Labour think?

Before getting into No.10, Labour said it would not change the law around items in the British Museum.

But the party suggested that, if elected, they would not prevent a loan deal if the British Museum and the Greek government came to an agreement.

Home office minister Jess Phillips was more candid on Sky News this morning, saying she did not know what the UK were going to do about the marbles.

“I think there’s probably a perfectly sensible solution that can come up,” she said. “It seems like two friendly nations could probably get over this issue.”

Did Starmer and Mitsotakis discuss a deal today?

It remains unclear if the two PMs did mention the touchy subject.

An official government readout of Starmer’s meeting with the Greek PM did not include any reference to the Marbles – although the Greek public broadcaster ERT claimed it was discussed.

A spokesman for the prime minister did not deny that the Greek PM raised the issue of the marbles during his talks with Starmer when asked by journalists, but said the “focus” of the meeting was on economic growth, trade, investment, education and defence.

He said: “It remains the case that decisions relating to the care and management of the sculptures are a matter for the trustees of the British Museum, which is operationally independent of the government and we have no plans to change the law to permit the permanent removal of the sculptures.”

However, he said the prime minister is “always open to discussions with world leaders about priorities important to them”.

Still, the issue has given the Tories a chance to drive the knife in, as they have accused the PM of caving to the “radical left” over the marbles, despite the majority of Brits backing it.

Saqib Bhatti, shadow culture minister, said: “Sir Keir Starmer has already capitulated over the Chagos Islands, and now it appears he is set to cave in to the radical left and return the Elgin marbles to Greece.

“The British Museum has cared for these precious artefacts for generations and given people from around the globe the chance to learn about their tremendous story.

“The marbles are protected by an act of parliament – the PM needs to be clear that he will not allow the law to be changed and block any legal work around that might be devised to allow them to be taken out of this country.

“The prime minister should be standing up for Britain, our heritage, and our world-class cultural institutions instead of giving in to pressure from campaigners who detest British history.”

Share Button

Covid corruption commissioner starts fraud probe

Tom Hayhoe’s first task will be reviewing the £8.7bn of pandemic PPE that had to be written off.

Share Button

Even low levels of arsenic in drinking water raise kidney cancer risk

New research findings from the Texas A&M University School of Public Health indicate that exposure to even low levels of arsenic poses significant health risks, including an increased risk of kidney cancer.

The incidence of kidney cancer in the United States rose by an average of 1.2 percent each year between 2011 and 2019 to become the seventh most common cancer. In the meantime, smoking — a well-established risk factor for kidney cancer — has continued to decline.

This led researchers to consider other possible contributing factors, including arsenic, a known cause of various cancers that is naturally occurring in groundwater in Texas and other areas. Unlike previous studies, the Texas A&M study focused on low levels of arsenic exposure (below the regulatory threshold of 10 parts per billion) in both public water systems, which are regulated by various government agencies, and private well systems, which are not regulated.

“Some public water systems are poorly managed and could expose customers to arsenic, but the 40 million people in the United States who rely on private wells are particularly vulnerable,” said Taehyun Roh, with the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics.

Others involved with the study were Daikwon Han, Xiaohui Xu, and then-doctoral student Nishat Tasnim Hasan, with the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Garett Sansom, with the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health. The project was supported by grants from the Houston Methodist Research Institute, Robert and Janice McNair Foundation and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

Their findings, published in Environmental Pollution, examined the relationship between kidney cancer rates and arsenic levels in drinking water across 240 Texas counties. The team analyzed cancer data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results on 28,896 cases of cancer among adults in Texas aged 20 and older, alongside water testing data from the Texas Department of State Health Services and the Texas Water Development Board.

They used a statistical model that accounts for geographic location and adjusted the model for demographic and socioeconomic factors and cancer risk factors such as obesity, smoking and diabetes. They also adjusted for covariates that included pesticide density, social vulnerability, income level, rurality, cardiovascular disease hospitalization rates and the prevalence of chronic kidney disease.

The analysis found that exposure to between 1 and 5 parts per billion raised kidney cancer risk by 6 percent, and exposure above 5 parts per billion raised the risk by 22 percent. In addition, the risk of cancer increased by 4 percent with each doubling of water arsenic levels.

“This suggests that even low-level arsenic exposure in drinking water may be associated with an increased risk of kidney cancer, which aligns with previous research indicating an association between this exposure and lung, bladder and skin cancers,” Roh said.

Hasan noted that their study design can indicate associations between factors but not causality and recommended that future studies focus on individual-level and biometric data — rather than the county-level data used here — to better assess the effects of factors such as lifestyle, family history of kidney cancer and other possible sources of arsenic exposure.

“Still, our findings indicate that reducing arsenic exposure could reduce the incidence of kidney cancer, and this could be achieved through efforts such as enhanced regulatory oversight and targeted public health interventions,” Hasan said.

Share Button

The Tories Spent £715 Million Sending No Asylum Seekers To Rwanda

The Tories’ Rwanda scheme cost nearly three quarters of a billion pounds despite failing to send a single asylum seeker to the country, it has been revealed.

Official figures released on Monday by the Home Office showed that a staggering £715m of taxpayers’ money was spent on the failed policy, which was scrapped by Labour after the election.

Further multi-million pound payments would have been due to Rwanda had the scheme continued.

Home secretary Yvette Cooper said it showed the scheme was “a grotesque waste of money”.

Former Conservative home secretary Priti Patel signed the “economic partnership agreement” with Rwandan foreign minister Vincent Biruta in April, 2022.

The aim was for the east African country to accept asylum seekers who entered the UK illegally and deter others from attempting to cross the English Channel from France in small boats.

But the European Court of Human Rights prevented any deportation flights from taking off, and the policy was eventually ruled unlawful by the Uk Supreme Court.

According to the Home Office, Rwanda received £290m from the UK government, with a further £50m being spent on flights, escorting, airfield and police costs.

Some £95m was spent on detention and reception centres, while £280m went on other fixed costs, such as developing IT systems and legal costs.

The Home Office said: “During more than 2 years in which the policy and partnership operated, only four volunteers and no asylum seekers were sent to Rwanda.”

In a statement to MPs, Cooper said: “84,000 people crossed the Channel from the day the deal was signed to the day it was scrapped. This so-called deterrent did not result in a single deportation.

“Or stop a single boat from crossing the Channel. For the British taxpayer, it was
a grotesque waste of money.”

Border security and asylum minister Angela Eagle said: “In the Tories’ own words, the asylum system is ‘broken’ and they ‘let the country down badly’ over 14 years in power.

“Now the sheer eye-watering scale of the Conservatives’ Rwanda gimmick has been exposed. The taxpayer has footed a £700 million bill thanks to their incompetence and Kemi Badenoch would do it all over again.

“This government has already started the hard graft. We hired more caseworkers to tackle the asylum backlog and get people out of hotels. We’ve also removed thousands of those with no right to be in the UK.

“Labour is getting on with cleaning up the Conservatives’ mess. Our new Border Security Command is working with our European partners to smash the criminal gang networks driving small boat crossings.”

Lisa Smart, the Lib Dem home affairs spokesperson, said: “The Conservatives should be utterly ashamed of themselves. £715 million wasted on their failed Rwanda scheme with absolutely nothing to show for it is a disgraceful waste of taxpayer money.

“Not only did they recklessly throw millions down the drain, but the Conservatives left our asylum system in a state of disrepair.”

Share Button