Boris and Carrie Johnson will not hold their wedding party at the prime minister’s country residence, sources have told HuffPost UK.

The couple were reportedly ploughing on with plans for a bash at Chequers as Johnson shifts to a caretaker role in his final days in office.

However, they have now decided to move the party’s location following criticism of the plan.

The pair married in a low-key, private ceremony at Westminster Cathedral last year and planned to have a larger celebration in 2022, when coronavirus restrictions were likely to be relaxed.

The Johnsons were said to have sent save-the-date cards to family and friends for the celebration on July 30.

However, a Downing Street source told HuffPost UK there would be no wedding bash at Chequers.

The planned wedding party is instead being moved to a different location at the end of this month, sources told The Sun.

The Evening Standard reported last month that the party would take the form of a “champagne-soaked soiree” to celebrate the couple’s first anniversary.

The Mirror said it was told by two separate sources that the pair were keen to go ahead with the celebrations.

On Friday morning a Cabinet minister suggested any new prime minister should let the couple have their wedding party at Chequers.

James Cleverly told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “Private functions like that do not impose a burden on the public purse…

“I think it’s churlish to be negative about two people who want to celebrate their marriage and their love for each other.”

Boris Johnson has resigned, after more than 50 Tory MPs dramatically quit in protest at his leadership.

This is what could happen next.

The Conservative Party will need to elect a new leader, who will automatically become prime minister. They do not need to hold a general election.

However this could take some time.

Tory leadership elections have two parts. The first stage sees Tory MPs vote in a series of rounds, whittling the list of candidates down to a final two.

In the 2019 leadership race this took roughly two weeks. But it could take longer depending on how many candidates stand.

The second stage sees the final two candidates go to a vote of Tory members. In 2019, when Johnson took on Jeremy Hunt, this took around a month.

Leadership candidates have on manoeuvres in Westminster in the expectation of a contest for months.

While the contest takes place, the country will still need a prime minister to govern the country.

Johnson has suggested he wants to remain in office as a caretaker prime minister until the Tory party conference in October.

But several Conservative have already spoken out against the idea.

Nick Gibb, a former schools minister, said: “As well as resigning as party leader the PM must resign his office.”

“After losing so many ministers, he has lost the trust and authority required to continue. We need an acting PM who is not a candidate for leader to stabilise the government while a new leader is elected.”

Simon Hoare, the chairman of the Commons Northern Ireland committee, said: “Ministers resigned *because* of the PM. The party lost confidence *because* of the PM. It is beyond credulity that Mr Johnson can stay in office even pro tem. New constitutional territory but he has to go and go means go.”

If not Johnson, Dominic Raab, the deputy prime minister, is seen as the most likely interim-leader, especially given he has ruled himself out of standing in the leadership contest.

One immediate action a caretaker PM will need to take, whether it is Johnson or someone else, is to fill all the empty ministerial posts.

For example, there are currently no ministers in the Department for Education

It is likely most if not all the ministers and ministerial aides who resigned over the course of the last two days could be reappointed to the same positions.

Once the party elects a new leader, they would have until January 2025 before they had to call a general election.

Attorney general Suella Braverman has already announced she intends to stand.

Other likely candidates include foreign secretary Liz Truss, former chancellor Rishi Sunak, former health secretary Sajid Javid and defence secretary Ben Walllace. Jeremy Hunt has also not ruled out a second bid for the top job.

will automatically become prime minister. They do not need to hold a general election.

However this could take some time.

Tory leadership elections have two parts. The first stage sees Tory MPs vote in a series of rounds, whittling the list of candidates down to a final two.

In the 2019 leadership race this took roughly two weeks. But it could take longer depending on how many candidates stand.

The second stage sees the final two candidates go to a vote of Tory members. In 2019, when Johnson took on Jeremy Hunt, this took around a month.

Leadership candidates have on manoeuvres in Westminster in the expectation of a contest for months.

While the contest takes place, the country will still need a prime minister to govern the country.

Johnson has suggested he wants to remain in office as a caretaker prime minister until the Tory party conference in October.

But several Conservative have already spoken out against the idea.

Nick Gibb, a former schools minister, said: “As well as resigning as party leader the PM must resign his office.”

“After losing so many ministers, he has lost the trust and authority required to continue. We need an acting PM who is not a candidate for leader to stabilise the government while a new leader is elected.”

Simon Hoare, the chairman of the Commons Northern Ireland committee, said: “Ministers resigned *because* of the PM. The party lost confidence *because* of the PM. It is beyond credulity that Mr Johnson can stay in office even pro tem. New constitutional territory but he has to go and go means go.”

If not Johnson, Dominic Raab, the deputy prime minister, is seen as the most likely interim-leader, especially given he has ruled himself out of standing in the leadership contest.

One immediate action a caretaker PM will need to take, whether it is Johnson or someone else, is to fill all the empty ministerial posts.

For example, there are currently no ministers in the Department for Education

It is likely most if not all the ministers and ministerial aides who resigned over the course of the last two days could be reappointed to the same positions.

Once the party elects a new leader, they would have until January 2025 before they had to call a general election.

Attorney general Suella Braverman has already announced she intends to stand.

Other likely candidates include foreign secretary Liz Truss, former chancellor Rishi Sunak, former health secretary Sajid Javid and defence secretary Ben Walllace. Jeremy Hunt has also not ruled out a second bid for the top job.

Keir Starmer has savaged Boris Johnson for keeping “predatory” Chris Pincher in a government job when he was aware of allegations about his behaviour.

The prime minister has been hit with a wave of ministerial resignations following the revelations about his former deputy chief whip.

Speaking during PMQs, Starmer read out the testimony of a man who accused Pincher of sexual assault.

“He knew the accused minister had previously committed predatory behaviour but he promoted him to a position of power anyway. Why?”

The Labour leader told Tory MPs: “They’re all sitting there as if this is normal behaviour.

“When that young man reported his attack to a government whip, she asked him if he was gay, when he said that he was, she replied ‘that doesn’t make it straightforward’.

“Will he apologise for those disgraceful comments on behalf of this government?”

Johnson replied that Pincher no longer had his job, nor the Conservative whip.

The PM added: “I want to say to him that I abhor bullying and abuse of power anywhere in parliament, in this party or in any other party.”

But Johnson also refused to deny he had once made light of the allegations by branding his ally: “Pincher by name, Pincher by nature.”

Starmer told him: “I’m not asking for bluster and half-truth. We’ve all had enough of that. Yes or no?”

Johnson has said that in “hindsight”, he should have realised that Pincher would have not changed.

Downing Street had initially said he had no knowledge of “specific” accusations against Pincher when he appointed him to the whip’s office in 2019.

But No.10 was then forced to admit the PM had been told about formal accusations against Pincher but decided to give him a job anyway.

Tory ministers resigning from Boris Johnson’s government is “the first case of sinking ships fleeing the rat”, Keir Starmer has said.

The prime minister’s grip on power is hanging by a thread, as more ministers resigned from his government over the course of Wednesday morning following the exit of Rishi Sunak and Sajid Javid.

Johnson was greeted with laughter at the start of PMQs as he told MPs it was a “big day” for the government, but insisted he intended to “keep going” as he had a “colossal mandate”.

Starmer said any ministers resigning now after having long defended Johnson did not have a “shred of integrity”.

“Isn’t this the first recorded case of the sinking ships fleeing the rat?” the Labour leader said.

Starmer added of those ministers who had not yet quit: “As for those who are left, only in office because no-one else is prepared to debase themselves any longer.

“The charge of the lightweight brigade. Have some self-respect.”

“Doesn’t the country deserve better than a z list cast of nodding dogs?”

So far 17 ministers and junior ministerial aides have so far announced their resignations. One minister resigned just minutes into the start of PMQs.

The demands for Johnson to go are coming from across all wings of the party.

Formally super loyal backbenchers Lee Anderson and Tom Hunt, from the 2019 intake, have called on Johnson to quit.

Robert Halfon, the well respected chair of the Commons education committee, called for a change of leader given the “real loss of integrity” but also a “failure of policy”.

Johnson is seen as unlikely to resign, but he could face another vote of no confidence if the 1922 committee of backbench MPs decides to change its rules, allowing a second vote within a year.

Boris Johnson forgot he had been directly told an investigation was held into Chris Pincher’s behaviour, No.10 has claimed.

The prime minister is under mounting pressure over his decision to appoint close ally Chris Pincher to the job of deputy chief whip.

Downing Street’s explanation has changed over the course of the last five days.

A former senior civil servant this morning publicly accused No.10 of saying things that were “not true”.

Pincher resigned from the post on Thursday after he was accused of drunkenly groping two men at a private members’ club in London last week.

Attention turned to what Johnson knew of allegations made about Pincher before he was appointed to the whips office in February 2022.

Downing Street said on Friday Johnson was not aware of any “specific” allegations about Pincher’s past behaviour.

On Monday morning No.10 shifted its position and said the prime minister had been aware of “allegations” as well as “reports and speculation” when he handed Pincher a job.

The PM’s spokesperson defended the decision on the basis that those previous allegations had either been “resolved” or “did not progress to a formal complaint”.

But early on Tuesday morning, Lord McDonald, the former top civil servant at the Foreign Office, said this was “not true”.

In a letter sent to the parliamentary standards commissioner, McDonald said in the summer of 2019 a complaint by a group of Foreign Office officials about Pincher’s conduct was investigated and upheld.

Crucially, McDonald said that the prime minister was informed of the outcome.

On Tuesday afternoon, the prime minister’s spokesperson said Johnson initially “didn’t recall” having been told about the incident when he was asked on Friday by Downing Street staff.

“At that point at the end of last week he hadn’t established that he had been informed of that in 2019 and we’ve subsequently been able to establish that he was given an update in some form,” the spokesperson said.

The spokesperson said it was “broadly” correct to say the PM had forgotten.

“The prime minister always seeks to provide the information as he has it. This related to a conversation a number of years ago,” they said.

“I can confirm he was briefed on that about the complaint related to Mr Pincher in the Foreign Office which was resolved.”

Asked if they had faith the prime minister was telling them the “full truth”, the spokesperson said: “Yes.”

No.10 defended the decision to appoint Pincher as deputy chief whip in February 2020 on the basis there were “no live allegations against him” at the time.

In his letter, McDonald said: “Mr Johnson was briefed in person about the initiation and outcome of the investigation. There was a ‘formal complaint’.

“Allegations were ‘resolved’ only in the sense that the investigation was completed; Mr Pincher was not exonerated.

“To characterise the allegations as ‘unsubstantiated’ is therefore wrong.”

Speaking later on BBC Radio 4′s Today programme, McDonald added of No.10: “I think they need to come clean.

“The sort of telling the truth and crossing your fingers at the same time and hoping that people are not too forensic in their subsequent questioning and I think that is not working.”