BBC Radio Audience Bursts Out Laughing After Esther McVey Says Sunak Has ‘Turned Economy Round’

A Tory minister was openly laughed at after she claimed Rishi Sunak has “turned the economy round”.

Appearing on BBC Radio 4′s ‘Any Questions’ programme on Friday night, McVey said Tory MPs must rally round the prime minister despite the party’s latest humiliating by-election defeats.

She said: “People need to now get behind Rishi Sunak, who actually inherited a difficult set of circumstances and say ‘yes, he has turned the economy round – that is turning round now’.”

As the studio audience burst into laughter, presenter Alex Forsyth said: “Is it? The UK’s just gone into a recession.”

McVey replied: “Yeah, OK. Those figures were from the end of last year, and you’re right it was a technical recession and it’s a shallow recession.”

Figures released by the Office for National Statistics on Thursday showed that the economy shrank by 0.3% in the final three months of 2023.

With gross domestic product (GDP) also contracting by 0.1% between July and September, that meant the economy was officially in recession.

Share Button

Social Media Reacts To $355 Million Verdict Against Donald Trump

One of the people who had an “emotional” reaction to the news was the former president’s niece, Mary Trump, who called the verdict “the end of my grandfather’s legacy.”

She added that it has “taken over half a century but Donald’s ability to commit fraud with impunity has come to an end — at least in New York — and trust me, that matters to him.”

The judgment includes a three-year ban on Trump serving as an officer or director of a New York corporation. Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. are banned for two years, and each was ordered to pay more than $4 million.

Other reactions to the penalty were just as fiery.

Share Button

How A Recession And By-Election Misery Sent Rishi Sunak Back To Square One

For three days, it looked as though Rishi Sunak was having the rarest of things for him – a good week.

Keir Starmer was under the cosh over Labour’s woes in Rochdale and, despite predictions to the contrary by economists, inflation did not go up again when the latest figures were published on Wednesday.

But all that changed at 7am the next day.

That was when the Office for National Statistics (ONS) confirmed that the UK economy had shrunk by 0.3% in the final quarter of last year.

Added to the 0.1% contraction in the three months before, it means the country was officially in recession – the very thing the prime minister had promised would not happen.

Then, in the early hours of Friday morning, the Tories lost two by-elections to Labour in previously-safe seats.

And while that was not wholly unexpected, the scale of the defeats – especially in Wellingborough – confirmed the party’s worst fears.

“This has been the position for 18 months and it’s showing no sign of changing,” one former Tory cabinet member told HuffPost UK then.

“The by-election results have just confirmed how bad things are, but maybe more people will now realise it.”

Election expert Sir John Curtice said the Tories were “staring defeat in the face at the general election”, not least because the party is leaking voters to both Labour and Reform UK.

The right-wing party secured 10% of the vote in Kingswood and 13% in Wellingborough – numbers to send a chill down the spine of many Conservative MPs nervously eyeing their own majorities.

Reform UK now have begun to put votes in the ballot box,” Curtice said.

“The problem that means for the Conservatives is that for every one voter who is switching to Labour, there’s now another one who’s switching to Reform.

“It means that that coalition of pro-Brexit voters that took Boris Johnson to victory in 2019 is just fragmenting further as Reform threatens to take more votes away from the Conservatives.”

The end result, Curtice said, is that “Sir Keir Starmer looks as likely to be the next prime minister as he did 24 hours ago, if not more so”.

That is despite the Labour leader enduring one of his worst weeks since taking on the job nearly four years ago.

With the U-turn on the party’s pledge to spend £28 billion a year on green energy projects still fresh in the memory, its campaign in the upcoming Rochdale by-election went up in smoke.

A recording of Labour candidate Azhar Ali accusing Israel of allowing the October 7 attack by Hamas to take place as a pretext to invading Gaza was leaked to the Mail on Sunday.

Ali issued a full apology and, initially, the party opted to stand by him.

But as Starmer swithered over what to do, more audio from the same event emerged in which Ali referred to Jewish people working in the media. Within hours, Labour had withdrawn their support for him, although it is too late to remove him from the ballot paper.

HuffPost UK has been told that the party was initially urged not to axe Ali by Jewish groups, who feared it would hand an open goal to George Galloway, who is also standing in Rochdale for his British Workers Party.

“They don’t want Galloway in the Commons spreading his poison,” said one source.

The Labour leadership considered announcing that their candidate would not take the party whip if he won, and would also not stand at the general election. However, the emergence of the second recording made his position untenable.

If George Galloway was not a candidate then it would have been a much easier decision,” said one senior Labour insider.

“But showing that we’re serious about tackling anti-Semitism and prioritising that above a by-election victory is a good message for us to get out there.”

One senior Tory MP said there was no chance of his party benefiting from the controversy.

“Rochdale is a bubble issue – it just doesn’t resonate outside Westminster,” he said.

The last 48 hours also appear to have put paid to any lingering chance that Sunak might opt for a May election, the reasoning being that by going long there is always the chance of something coming up to get the Tories back in the race.

But one veteran backbencher said: “I’ve always been in favour of a May election as it’s our best chance of getting a decent number of Tory MPs back.”

The Conservatives have now been reduced to warning their former supporters that a vote for Reform simply increases the chances of a Labour government by splitting the right-wing vote.

That has led to Labour attacking Reform by insisting the party failed to meet expectations in the by-elections.

One insider said: “13% in Wellingborough is an under-performance for them. Ukip came second there in 2015 with 19.6%.”

But a Reform source told HuffPost UK: “We doubled our best ever result twice in one night, did better than our national polling average from a standing start, and without the clout, people, money, national recognition or local knowledge that Labour have.

“If that’s underperformed, they better watch out for when we get into our stride.”

For Sunak, however, the prospect of the Tories getting into their stride this side of the general election seems like a distant one.

The PM is fond of warning that a Labour government would take the country “back to square one”.

Ironically, at the end of a week which initially seemed to be going well, that is precisely where he has ended up.

Share Button

Trump Hit With $350 Million Penalty In Civil Fraud Trial

Donald Trump owes the state of New York more than $350 million in damages for decades of fraudulent business practices in the state, a New York State Supreme Court judge ruled Friday.

The judgement made by Judge Arthur Engoron also forbids Trump, and two of his former associates, from serving as an officer or director of any New York corporation or other legal entity in New York for three years.

Trump’s two sons, Eric and Donald Jr, are also banned from serving as executives for New York companies for two years. Both were also hit with $4 million fines.

Over the course of a 44-day civil trial, New York Attorney General Letitia James’ office accused Trump of grossly exaggerating his wealth in order to secure favorable business loans by deceiving banks and insurers.

That includes overvaluing Mar-a-Lago by as much as 2,300%, for example, and falsely claiming his penthouse in Trump Tower was three times larger than it actually was.

James initially argued Trump and his affiliated businesses should disgorge $250 million, only to increase the figure to $370 million in a post-trial brief.

The amount is no arbitrary figure: The attorney general’s office estimates Trump’s fraud yielded at least to $168 million in illegal gains on his loan to purchase 40 Wall Street, $139 million related to the sale of the Old Post Office in Washington, D.C., $60 million from the sale of Ferry Point golf club and $2.5 million in bonuses paid to accomplices.

Judge Arthur Engoron found in an earlier part of the trial that Trump had indeed committed fraud for years; all that remained was to tally up the damages.

“A discrepancy of this order of magnitude, by a real estate developer sizing up his own living space of decades, can only be considered fraud,” Engoron concluded in his 35-page September ruling.

“In defendants’ world: rent regulated apartments are worth the same as unregulated apartments; restricted land is worth the same as unrestricted land; restrictions can evaporate into thin air; a disclaimer by one party casting responsibility on another party exonerates the other party’s lies,” Engoron wrote. “That is a fantasy world, not the real world.”

Former President Donald Trump speaks to the media at a Washington hotel on Tuesday, Jan. 9, 2024.
Former President Donald Trump speaks to the media at a Washington hotel on Tuesday, Jan. 9, 2024.

AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

Defence attorney Chris Kise blamed Trump’s accountants for the fraud, describing the case against his client as “manufactured to pursue a political agenda”.

“President Trump relied on multimillion-dollar accountants at Mazars,” Kise said in his closing statement. Kise suggested that, instead of punishing Trump, he “should get a medal” for his business acumen.

Mazars cut ties with Trump in 2022, warning at the time that the financial statements it prepared for Trump from 2011 through 2020 “should no longer be relied upon”.

While on the stand as a witness, Trump repeatedly pointed to what he called a “disclaimer clause” appended to those statements that he believed absolved him of all responsibility for their accuracy.

“We would call it a worthless statement clause,” he said at one point, seeking to diminish the value of the fraudulent documents. “They were not really documents that the banks paid much attention to.”

Engoron dismissed the argument in a pre-trial ruling.

“Defendants’ reliance on these ‘worthless’ disclaimers is worthless,” he wrote. “The ‘worthless clause’ does not say what the defendants say it says, does not rise to the level of an enforceable disclaimer, and cannot be used to insulate fraud.”

Over the course of the months-long trial, Trump complained frequently on social media about the lack of a jury, conveniently ignoring the fact that his lawyers hadn’t attempted to request one.

He also repeatedly called it a “hoax”, “unconstitutional” and a “witch hunt”, in addition to attacking Engoron and other court staffers on social media. Trump repeatedly violated a gag order intended to curtail those attacks, then demanded a mistrial, claiming in part that the order violated his First Amendment rights to free speech.

In additional attempts to dismiss the suit, Trump’s lawyers argued there wasn’t evidence that Trump’s actions had caused public harm and that the statute of limitations had expired for many of the allegations.

Trump declined to testify in his defence (despite claiming he would) and backed out of delivering his own closing argument after Engoron insisted that Trump address only the “relevant” matters of the case should he do so.

Trump will likely appeal the decision.

Share Button

Tory Backlash After ‘Shameful’ Post Editing Sadiq Khan Interview On Anti-Semitism

The Conservative Party has faced a fierce backlash after sharing an edited clip of Sadiq Khan making a slip-up during a TV interview.

The Tories posted a doctored video of an interview with the Mayor of London to make it look as if he says Labour is an “anti-Semitic” party.

The Labour politician was addressing questions raised by his party for suspending two by-election candidates for anti-Israel comments.

Questioned by a Sky News presenter, Khan said: “As far as I’m concerned, that sort of language isn’t acceptable, and it certainly shouldn’t be acceptable in a party like mine, that is proud to be both anti-racist and anti-Semitic.” He quickly corrected himself, adding: “I beg your pardon, tackling anti-Semitism.”

On the Tory party’s official X account, the interview was shortened to make Khan look bad – prompting an immediate backlash.

Former Tory MP Nick De Bois said: “For the avoidance of doubt – this is a shameful tweet from Conservatives. The editing of the original clip is deceitful and this tweet should be taken down.”

A community note added to the original Tory tweet said: “This clip has been cut short. Sadiq Khan misspoke and immediately corrected himself to say ‘tackling anti-Semitism’.”

Mike Katz, national chair of the Jewish Labour Movement, replied to the Conservatives’ tweet, posting: “Shame on you Conservatives. Sadiq misspoke and instantly corrected himself.

“You cynically cut the video for a cheap political advantage. The Jewish community is tired of being used as a political football. Stop it.”

Rabbi David Mason, executive director of the Jewish Council for Racial Equality, highlighted how figures released today by the Community Security Trust charity showed “a massive rise in real anti-Semitism affecting the Jewish community”.

In a reply to the Tory tweet, he added: “You use a clear misspeaking to turn our community and anti-Semitism into a political football.

“The mayor of London has looked to bring people together. Stop sowing division.”

This week, the party withdrew support for Azhar Ali, who is standing in Rochdale, after he said Israel deliberately allowed 1,400 people to be killed on its own soil on October 7.

The Mail on Sunday reported Ali said Israel did so in order to give the “green light” to invade of Gaza, when at the meeting of the Lancashire Labour Party.

Graham Jones, a former Labour MP, was “administratively suspended” from the party after audio emerged appearing to show he said “fucking Israel” at the same meeting, while also allegedly suggesting that British people who volunteer to fight with the Israeli Defence Forces should be “locked up”.

Share Button

‘Kiss My Ass’: David Cameron Gets Short Shrift From Marjorie Taylor Greene After Ukraine Funding Plea

David Cameron has prompted an angry reaction from US Republican politician Marjorie Taylor Greene after drawing comparisons to the appeasement of Adolf Hitler when urging Congress to approve a multi-billion dollar funding package to Ukraine.

The British foreign secretary on Tuesday made a direct plea to American politicians amid the stalemate over $95.3 billion (£75 billion) of support to Ukraine to help it continue its war against Russia.

But the former prime minister’s lobbying drew a fierce response from Taylor Greene, the controversial member of the House of Representatives from the Donald Trump-supporting MAGA wing of the GOP.

Taylor Greene was confronted by James Matthews of Sky News, who characterised Cameron’s comments as likening her “to an appeaser to Hitler in not voting for funding to Ukraine ”.

“Are you an appeaser for Putin?” the correspondent asked.

“I really don’t care what David Cameron has to say,” she replied. “I think that’s rude name-calling and I don’t appreciate that type of language. David Cameron needs to worry about his own country and frankly he can kiss my ass.”

In an unusual move, Cameron used an article on the Washington DC website The Hill to urge Congress to support Ukraine with more funding.

He said: “I believe our joint history shows the folly of giving in to tyrants in Europe who believe in redrawing boundaries by force.

“I do not want us to show the weakness displayed against Hitler in the 1930s. He came back for more, costing us far more lives to stop his aggression.”

Share Button

Trump Marks Valentine’s Day By Fundraising Off Of Melania Not Leaving Him

Happy Valentine’s Day! Donald Trump celebrated the occasion by hailing his wife for not leaving him as he faces 91 felony charges ― and then asking for $47.

“Dear Melania, I LOVE YOU!” Trump says in a Valentine’s Day letter to his wife in a Wednesday campaign email. In case it isn’t clear, the email says it three times and shouts in all caps: THIS IS A VALENTINE’S DAY LETTER FROM DONALD J. TRUMP.

OK. MESSAGE DELIVERED.
OK. MESSAGE DELIVERED.

The Trump Save America Joint Fundraising Committee

And then, the poetry begins.

“Even after every single INDICTMENT, ARREST, and WITCH HUNT, you never left my side,” gushes the GOP presidential front-runner. “I wouldn’t be the man I am today without your guidance, kindness, and warmth,” Trump continues, with sudden emphasis, “You will always mean the world to me, Melania!”

He signs his love note, “From your husband with love, Donald J. Trump.”

Love is in the air.
Love is in the air.

Trump Save America Joint Fundraising Committee

If this Valentine’s Day letter inspired you to want to “SEND YOUR LOVE” to Melania, the email gives you the option of doing so by clicking on those words, which take you to a page asking for money for Trump’s presidential campaign.

Specifically, it asks for $47 if you think Trump is “the greatest president of all time!”

You can also give 20 bucks and some change if you want to support Trump’s campaign.

Nothing says romance like asking strangers for 47 bucks because you think you're awesome.
Nothing says romance like asking strangers for 47 bucks because you think you’re awesome.

The Trump Save America Joint Fundraising Committee

What does this have to do with Trump’s love for his wife or Valentine’s Day? If you click on either of those dollar amounts, little hearts appear on the donation boxes for a second.

Melania Trump has been largely missing from the public eye since her husband lost the presidential election in 2020. She hasn’t been on the campaign trail with him and hasn’t joined him at his many court appearances in his criminal trials.

The former First Lady also hasn’t said anything about Trump’s recent loss in court: He was ordered to pay $83.4 million to E. Jean Carroll for defamation after raping her.

Share Button

Valentine’s Day More Expensive Thanks To Tory ‘Cost Of Loving Crisis’, Says Labour

Rishi Sunak’s “cost of loving crisis” has made it more expensive to be romantic on Valentine’s Day, Labour has warned.

Flowers, wine, chocolate, ice cream, meals out and hotel stays have all soared in price since 2018.

Labour said official figures revealed people are paying “l’amour for less”, with the average cost of several classic gifts and treats having increased by 30%.

Shadow Treasury minister James Murray said: “Whether it’s flowers or chocolates, a meal out or a night in, even Valentine’s Day is being hit by the Tories’ failure on the economy.

“It’s no wonder people have fallen out of love with the Conservatives.”

Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures showed cut flowers and chocolate are 14% more expensive.

The price of a bottle of wine is now 38% higher – now costing £22.

And the cost of a main course in a restaurant has increased by 36%, with a pudding now 30% more expensive.

But staying at home still costs more, with chilled pot deserts increasing in price by a 41% and ice cream up by 15%.

A hotel stay is now more than £110 on average – 45% more expensive than in 2018.

The figures also revealed a trip to the theatre has increased in price by 42% and popcorn at the cinema is 24% more expensive than in 2018 at nearly £6.

Share Button

Trump Takes His Claim Of ‘Total Immunity’ From Prosecution To Supreme Court

WASHINGTON ― Donald Trump has taken his claim of “total immunity” from criminal prosecution for his coup attempt to the US Supreme Court, thereby keeping his case from moving toward trial until the high court issues a ruling.

The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on February 6 unanimously upheld the trial court’s decision that Trump was not immune from prosecution for his actions leading up to and on the January 6, 2021, assault of the Capitol he incited to block the transfer of presidential power after he lost the 2020 election. Appellate judges told the former president he had until February 12 to file a request for a stay with the Supreme Court, which would further freeze his case until justices make a decision to take it on or not.

Trump argued to both US District Judge Tanya Chutkan and a three-judge panel of the appellate court that any and all of the actions a president takes in office are immune from prosecution and that the only way a former president can be prosecuted is if they were first impeached in the House and convicted in the Senate.

Both Chutkan and the appellate judges disagreed.

“Former President Trump’s claimed immunity would have us extend the framework for presidential civil immunity to criminal cases and decide for the first time that a former president is categorically immune from federal criminal prosecution for any act conceivably within the outer perimeter of his executive responsibility,” the appeals judges wrote.

Trump has indicated he would also ask the Supreme Court to review the substance of the appellate court ruling. If a majority of the justices agreed to overturn the appeals court, it would likely end the felony, four-count election subversion case against him.

Trump has previously said he hopes the Supreme Court’s conservative majority, particularly the three justices he appointed, will rule in his favor in his criminal cases.

In December, the Supreme Court declined to review the immunity question at the request of special counsel Jack Smith, who had asked justices to step in and decide the matter immediately.

Chutkan had slated Trump’s trial on charges of conspiracy and obstruction of an official proceeding to start in early March, but earlier this month said the case could not move forward until Trump’s appeal was settled.

Trump, though, will continue to face three other criminal prosecutions. A separate Georgia state indictment charges him with trying to overturn the election in that state. A second federal indictment is based on his refusal to turn over secret documents he took with him to his South Florida country club after leaving the White House, while a New York state indictment accuses him of falsifying business records to hide a $130,000 hush money payment to a porn actor just ahead of the 2016 election.

Despite the 91 felony charges across the four indictments, Trump is the all-but-certain Republican presidential nominee for the November election.

Share Button

Tory Peer Says Government Behaving Like ‘Despots’ Over Rwanda Bill

A Tory peer has accused the government of acting like “despots” over its Rwanda deportation policy.

As the controversial Safety of Rwanda Bill makes its way through parliament, both Tory and Labour members of the House of Lords lined up to warn of its dangers on Monday night.

Conservative grandee Lord Tugendhat, whose nephew is security minister Tom Tugendhat, took exception to attempts to overturn a Supreme Court ruling blocking the government from deporting asylum seekers to the east African country.

The peer claimed the bill could have an impact on the UK’s perception as a “marvellous place to do business because of our great respect for the rule of law”.

“I have been a member of parliament for a very long time on and off, and I have been a member of the Conservative party for some 66 years when I counted it up, and I do have to say that I find it quite extraordinary that the party of Margaret Thatcher should be introducing a bill of this kind,” Lord Tugendhat said.

He added: “What we are being asked to do really represents the sort of behaviour that the world associates with despots and autocracies, not with an established democracy, not with the mother of parliaments. It is a bill we should not even be asked to confront, let alone pass.”

The legislation is designed to overcome legal challenges to past attempts to send people to the east African country

It is central to the prime minister’s hopes of convincing voters he can “stop the boats” crossing the English channel.

The government hopes once the bill passes flights will be able to take off by the spring.

Share Button