NaNoWriMo – Days 13-15

We’re halfway through NaNoWriMo 2020, and my novel is now at 26,344 words.

Since this is the halfway point – with 50K words in 30 days being the goal – I should be at 25K words now, so I’m 1344 words ahead.

I think it was a wise decision to get ahead of the 1667 words per day pacing and then to pad that lead by a small amount each day, so I always feel like I’m ahead of schedule.

Many people get behind on their desired pacing and end up having to write 10-20K words in the last few days to catch up (or even on the final day). While I don’t think it’s such a big deal to do a marathon catch-up session at the end, I don’t think the Nano experience is quite as fun and motivating if you spend most or all of it feeling like you’re behind. I very much prefer to feel slightly ahead for the entire month.

It’s nice to just do 1700 or 1800 words and call my writing done for the day, knowing that I’m padding my lead by a modest amount each day. I can do that all month long with relative ease.

It’s especially nice to know that all I have to do is continue the same pacing I’ve been using for the first 15 days for the second 15 days, and I’ll coast across the finish line, likely reaching 50K words on Day 28 or 29.

Enjoyment

Some people talk about hitting a wall around this point. I’m presently experiencing the opposite.

Even when I hit my word target for the day and think, “I could do another 500 words right now,” I still stop. I prefer to leave something in the tank for the next day. This approach is working well. I’m feeling more motivated as I go along instead of feeling drained.

The writing is so much easier now than it was when I started, especially since I know the characters better after writing 20+ scenes with them. The dialogue feels more natural as it flows onto the screen, like real people communicating with wit, charm, humor, sass, and occasional silliness. It’s nice to be past the stiffness and shallowness of the dialogue that I began with in the first week. Now it’s easy to tell characters apart just from their speech patterns.

I didn’t know that it would be so much fun to breathe life into characters and then see how they respond to different situations. As I gradually build more detailed representations for these characters somewhere in my brain, it’s easier to discern how they’ll respond and react.

I still have to think through a lot of the plot, but now I’m able to write decent scenes just by grabbing a few characters and putting them into a fresh situation. They naturally seem to say and do things in accordance with their goals.

This is giving me the capacity to focus on other aspects of the story. I can now write scenes with more detail, nuance, and subtlety than when I first started, mainly because I don’t have to expend so much mental energy figuring out what the characters will say and do.

Sexuality

One aspect I’m wondering about is how sexual to make the story. There is a lot of sexuality in some scenes as I’m currently writing them, and I’m just running with that for now because it’s a first draft. But I am thinking ahead to whether I may end up cutting a lot of that material later.

I don’t recall ever reading any erotica (other than what people occasionally send in the form of naughty emails), and I’m not really trying to write that kind of book.

The story doesn’t have to go too much in a sexual direction, but for now there’s a certain pull with some characters and situations to take it there, and it would be weird not to let those characters have at it when they seem inclined. This is definitely a sci-fi story, but there’s an unusual romance at the core of it too.

None of the sexual aspects are vanilla, so they’re not like what you’d see in a typical R-rated movie with a sex scene or two. There are sexual situations in the book that don’t currently exist today, mainly due to the melding of sexuality and AI in the story.

One concept that Robert McKee emphasized in his Story seminar last year was to “Write the truth.” I think I grasp what he means by this. There’s an inauthentic way to have characters behave, so as to force some predetermined plot points to occur. But well-developed characters have their own authenticity to uphold.

Another way to write the truth is to share something deep and real that rings true. “Write the truth” is a call to courage – to be honest in expressing the story’s themes and not to water down the ideas. So I take that to mean that if the sexual aspects are honest expressions of the themes, then they very much belong in the story.

It feels aligned to have characters behave like real humans would, not to steer them away from sex if they’d actually be inclined to nudge things in that direction.

The competing force is thinking about selling the book to readers when it’s done. I’ve only done a little research on the book market so far, but I see a lot of potential for this story to be made into a movie someday. As it stands now, this novel would surely be an X-rated movie. At this point I don’t know if the story has to go that route to be authentically told though.

I could tone it down in future drafts to make it R or PG-13. I’m not sure if I’ll want to though. I think the story is likely to be more honest with more sexual situations intact or even expanded. The sexual situations are far from gratuitous. They naturally fit the flow of the story. And they help to raise the stakes as the story progresses.

Personally I think the story will be more fun to read if the sexual aspects are included instead of artificially censored. So my current preference is to write the book for readers who will appreciate authentic sexuality that fits the honest story without feeling like it should be more prudish.

I just don’t think it would feel as good to me to publish a story where I felt like I held back a lot just to appeal to a broader market. I don’t think I want to be that kind of writer.

However, if I can make the book appeal to a broader market without sacrificing anything that’s really important to the story, I may consider that, but my priority is to tell an interesting and meaningful story.

Instead of getting emails that say “cool story,” I’d honestly rather get emails that say, “That was hot! More please!” combined with other emails that say, “You will rot in hell for this, foul demon!”

There are plenty of vanilla books for vanilla readers. I think it would be more rewarding to write a book that scares away vanilla readers and pleases the non-vanilla ones. This isn’t due to being overly rebellious. I think honesty will suffice.

Share Button

Coronavirus: Dentists warn millions of treatments have been missed

The British Dental Association warns there will be “an oral health crisis” without government support.

Share Button

Health24.com | Weight loss and timing of meals – does it matter?

  • Eating more at breakfast and less at dinner was previously seen as beneficial
  • Studies were conducted indicating that this could help with weight loss
  • Recent research, however, shows otherwise

There are many theories around when and what one should eat in order to lose or maintain weight. One widely-accepted belief is that we must eat breakfast and that most of our daily calories should be consumed at breakfast. 

This idea is backed by numerous studies, one of which concluded: “High-calorie breakfast with reduced intake at dinner is beneficial and might be a useful alternative for the management of obesity and metabolic syndrome.”

Ground-breaking research presented on 13 November at the American Heart Association’s Scientific Sessions 2020, however, proves otherwise.

Author of the study and associate professor at John Hopkins University, Nisa M. Maruthur stated: “We have wondered for a long time if when one eats during the day affects the way the body uses and stores energy.” 

This led Maruthur and a team of her colleagues to conduct a study investigating whether restricting meals to early in the day would facilitate weight loss.

Time-restricted eating patterns

The study involved 41 adults with a BMI that classified them as being overweight. Ninety percent of the participants were Black women who were either diabetic or prediabetic. Twenty-one of the participants were assigned to a time-restricted eating plan which limited them to eating at specific hours only, and they had to eat 80% of their daily calories before 13:00.

The remaining 20 adults ate at usual times but consumed 50% of their daily calories after 17:00. Weight and blood pressure of the participants were measured at four-week intervals.

The researchers hypothesised that participants following a time-restricted feeding pattern would lose more weight than those following a more traditional eating pattern.

Eating times not deciding factors for weight loss

Researchers were stunned by the results of the study, which found that across both groups people lost weight and their blood pressure decreased regardless of when they ate. 

According to Maruthur, “Most prior studies have not controlled the number of calories, so it wasn’t clear if people who ate earlier just ate fewer calories. In this study, the only thing we changed was the time of day of eating.”

These results prove that you won’t necessarily gain weight if you were to eat bigger meals later in the day compared to eating a larger number of calories in the morning.

Image credit: iStock

NEXT ON HEALTH24X

Share Button

Health24.com | A common Covid-19 virus mutation may make it more susceptible to vaccines

  • It’s been confirmed that SARS-CoV-2 has mutated in a way that’s enabled it to spread more quickly 
  • However, the spike mutation may also make the virus more susceptible to a vaccine
  • As the study was not carried out on humans, additional studies are needed to track the consequences of these mutations 

The new coronavirus has a complex biology, and, according to ScienceMag, accumulates about two changes per month in its genome (the genetic material).

Now, a new study by scientists from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the University of Wisconsin-Madison has revealed that, while SARS-CoV-2 has mutated in a way that’s enabled it to be more infectious than other coronaviruses, the spike mutation may also make it more susceptible to a vaccine.

The findings, published in Science, note that the new strain, called D614G, emerged in Europe and has become the most common in the world. 

Strain more sensitive to neutralisation 

“The D614G virus outcompetes and outgrows the ancestral strain by about 10-fold and replicates extremely efficiently in primary nasal epithelial cells, which are a potentially important site for person-to-person transmission,” study author Ralph Baric, professor of epidemiology at the UNC-Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health and professor of microbiology and immunology at the UNC School of Medicine, said in a UNC news release.

However, despite the D614G strain replicating faster and becoming the most common worldwide, the research team found that it is slightly more sensitive to neutralisation by antibody drugs.

Baric has studied coronaviruses for more than three decades. He was also integral in the development of remdesivir, the first FDA-approved treatment for Covid-19. 

Why does the strain dominate?

Researchers believe the D614G strain dominates because it increases the spike protein’s ability to open cells for the virus to enter.

“The original spike protein had a ‘D’ at this position, and it was replaced by a ‘G’,” said Yoshihiro Kawaoka, a virologist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.” Several papers had already described that this mutation makes the protein more functional and more efficient at getting into cells.”

The newly discovered mutation causes a flap on the tip of one spike to pop open, the researchers explained, thereby allowing the virus to infect cells more efficiently. It also creates a pathway to the virus’s vulnerable core, they said.

On the bright side, with one flap open, it’s also easier for antibodies, such as the ones currently being tested in vaccines, to infiltrate and disable the virus.

For this study, the researchers ran hamster experiments and performed replication and airborne transmission studies with both the original virus and the mutated version created by the team.

“We saw that the mutant virus transmits better airborne than the [original] virus, which may explain why this virus dominated in humans,” said Kawaoka.

Pathology also examined

In addition to the above, the researchers also looked at the pathology of the two coronavirus strains.

After infection, the hamsters displayed more or less the same viral load and symptoms, suggesting that while the mutant virus is much better at infecting hosts, it doesn’t cause significantly worse illness.

However, the researchers caution that these results may not reflect in human studies.

“SARS-CoV-2 is an entirely new human pathogen and its evolution in human populations is hard to predict,” Baric said.

“New variants are continually emerging, like the recently discovered mink SARS-CoV-2 cluster 5 variant in Denmark that also encodes D614G.

“To maximally protect public health, we must continue to track and understand the consequences of these new mutations on disease severity, transmission, host range and vulnerability to vaccine-induced immunity,” he commented.

READ | Does it matter that the Covid-19 virus is mutating?

READ | Mutation helps coronavirus infect more human cells, study shows

READ | How genetic mutations in healthy young men made them susceptible to severe Covid-19

Image credit: Getty/Peter Zelei Images

Share Button

Covid-19: Normal life back next winter, says vaccine creator

Prof Ugur Sahin also raises hopes the vaccine, developed with Pfizer. could halve Covid transmission.

Share Button

Most statin problems caused by mysterious ‘nocebo effect’, study suggests

Issues are not caused by the drug but by people believing it will make them sick, a study suggests.

Share Button

Go (over) easy on the eggs: ‘Egg-cess’ consumption linked to diabetes

Scrambled, poached or boiled, eggs are a popular breakfast food the world over. Yet the health benefits of the humble egg might not be all they’re cracked up to be as new research from the University of South Australia shows that excess egg consumption can increase your risk of diabetes.

Conducted in partnership with the China Medical University, and Qatar University, the longitudinal study (1991 to 2009) is the first to assess egg consumption in a large sample of Chinese adults.

It found that people who regularly consumed one or more eggs per day (equivalent to 50 grams) increased their risk of diabetes by 60 per cent.

With the prevalence of diabetes in China now exceeding 11 per cent — above that of the global average of 8.5 per cent — diabetes has become a serious public health concern.

The economic impact of diabetes is also significant, accounting for 10 per cent of global health expenditure (USD $760 billion). In China, diabetes-related costs have exceeded USD $109 billion.

Epidemiologist and public health expert, UniSA’s Dr Ming Li, says the rise of diabetes is a growing concern, especially in China where changes to the traditional Chinese diet are impacting health.

“Diet is a known and modifiable factor that contributes to the onset Type 2 diabetes, so understanding the range of dietary factors that might impact the growing prevalence of the disease is important,” Dr Li says.

“Over the past few decades China has undergone a substantial nutritional transition that’s seen many people move away from a traditional diet comprising grains and vegetables, to a more processed diet that includes greater amounts of meat, snacks and energy-dense food.

“At the same time, egg consumption has also been steadily increasing; from 1991 to 2009, the number of people eating eggs in China nearly doubled*.

“While the association between eating eggs and diabetes is often debated, this study has aimed to assess people’s long-term egg consumption of eggs and their risk of developing diabetes, as determined by fasting blood glucose.

“What we discovered was that higher long-term egg consumption (greater than 38 grams per day) increased the risk of diabetes among Chinese adults by approximately 25 per cent.

“Furthermore, adults who regularly ate a lot of eggs (over 50 grams, or equivalent to one egg, per day) had an increased risk of diabetes by 60 per cent.”

The effect was also more pronounced in women than in men.

Dr Li says that while these results suggest that higher egg consumption is positively associated with the risk of diabetes in Chinese adults, more research is needed to explore causal relationships.

“To beat diabetes, a multi-faceted approach is needed that not only encompasses research, but also a clear set of guidelines to help inform and guide the public. This study is one step towards that long-term goal.”

Notes to Editors:

  • *Between the years 1991-2009, researchers found that the average daily consumption of eggs increased continuously from 16 grams in 1991-93, to 26 grams in 2000-04, and 31 grams in 2009.
  • The study population comprised 8545 adults (average age 50 years) participating in the China Health and Nutrition Survey.
  • International egg consumption across the same period was:
    • 33.65 g/day in Europe
    • 28.43 g/day in America
    • 20.56 g/day in Asia
    • 21.45 g/day in the world
    • 18.20 g/day in Oceania (including Australia)
    • 5.93 g/day in Africa.

Story Source:

Materials provided by University of South Australia. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Share Button

Desperation Loyalty

Desperation loyalty is remaining loyal to a group or identity based on neediness or clinginess, often in violation more important values. It is a place of stuckness that elevates loyalty to others above the commitment to grow.

It’s relatively easy to spot this in other people. It’s harder to spot this in ourselves.

If you pursue a strong and centered path of personal growth for many years, you will outgrow many friends and social groups along the way. That’s a normal part of a life of growth and change.

But at some point in your journey, especially early on, you may have doubts about taking the next leap because it may feel like a leap into aloneness.

The truth is that you may sometimes leap into aloneness, but these needn’t be leaps into loneliness.

Accepting an invitation to grow is an individual decision. That is your challenge to face, and some challenges in life must be faced alone. Now and then it’s important to get away from social influences to dwell in the fire of your own values and let them burn out of you what no longer feels aligned.

The antidote to desperation loyalty is inspiration loyalty. Feel the call of this fiery invitation, and give it your full attention when it demands this from you.

Share Button

Essure: Women in England take legal action against sterilising-device maker

The device has been withdrawn from the market for commercial reasons but its makers stand by its safety.

Share Button

Covid-19: Next two weeks ‘crucial’ for ending England lockdown

People in England must not become complacent due to a potential vaccine, a government scientist says.

Share Button