Trump Has Admitted He’s ‘Very Unhappy’ With Israel’s Strikes On Doha. Here’s Why That Matters

Donald Trump is clearly not happy with Israel after it chose to launch missile strikes into Qatar.

While Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he was trying to hit Hamas militants in the Qatari capital of Doha, striking a country which has act as a mediator in the Middle East has sent shockwaves around the world.

To make matters even worse, it appears Netanyahu pushed ahead with the attack without giving the US – or Qatar – significant advance notice.

Israel’s international alliances have already been put under intense strain by its war on Gaza – only the Trump administration has consistently stood by Netanyahu.

But could Israel’s surprise attack on Doha change all that?

Here’s what we know – and why it matters.

What happened between Israel and Qatar?

Israel launched 10 missile strikes at the Hamas headquarters in Qatar – where the militants have been offered immunity – on Tuesday night.

Several key figures within the militant group had gathered to discuss Trump’s latest peace plan for Gaza.

Hamas claimed its leader had survived the attack, although his son and four others were killed along with a member of the Qatari security forces.

If this is true, the strike could turn out to be a huge miscalculation for Netanyahu, considering the international reaction and the knock-on impact for peace talks.

The UK’s prime minister Keir Starmer said the attacks “violate Qatar’s sovereignty and risk further escalation across the region”, while French president Emmanuel Macron said the strikes were “unacceptable”.

The UN’s secretary general Antonio Guterres also echoed their concerns, saying: “I condemn this flagrant violation of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Qatar. All parties must work towards achieving a permanent ceasefire, not destroying it.”

Smoke billowing after explosions in Qatar's capital Doha on September 9, 2025.
Smoke billowing after explosions in Qatar’s capital Doha on September 9, 2025.

JACQUELINE PENNEY via AFPTV/AFP via Getty Images

Qatar’s prime minister, Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thanil, also alleged Israel had used missiles in the attack which air defence systems could not detect.

He claimed Israel’s “treacherous attack” had sabotaged ceasefire efforts for Gaza, that mediation efforts were “part of Qatari identity”, and that a legal team was considering his country’s response to the attack.

But Netanyahu has so far doubled down. Speaking at the US embassy in Jerusalem, he said: “The days when terrorist leaders can enjoy immunity anywhere are over.”

He claimed that attack was “fully justified” because it targeted the senior leaders who organised Hamas’s raid on Israeli soil on October 7, 2023.

Other officials described the strike as a response to the Hamas attack on Jerusalem bus stop on Monday where six Israelis were killed.

However, Netanyahu did also insist that Israel had acted on its own, saying: “Israel initiated it, Israel conducted it, and Israel takes full responsibility.”

The strike comes after the chief of staff of the Israeli military Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir said Hamas leadership would be targeted across “the entire Middle East” with “no place to hide from us”.

What did the US say about Netanyahu’s latest attack?

The US is allied with Qatar, and even has a huge airbase stationed in the country.

Trump’s press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the attack on the soil of a close ally “does not advance Israel or America’s goals”.

She said the US president had been alerted to the strike by the US military, not Israel, and that Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff then notified the Qataris – only it was too late.

Trump “feels very badly” about the strikes, according to Leavitt, and “made his thoughts and concerns about this very clear” when he later spoke to Netanyahu.

The US president himself later told reporters that he was “very unhappy about the way that went down” and that he would offer a full statement on Wednesday.

What does this all mean?

Israel’s strikes pour cold water on the US’s ongoing attempts to end the war in Gaza.

Trump had been championing a US peace proposal for Israel and Hamas which would include the release of all Israeli hostages in exchange for an unspecified number of Palestinian prisoners.

But his plan did not include a permanent end to the war – a condition Hamas has demanded, but Israel has declined.

This new attack on Qatari soil suggests Netanyahu is clearly no longer willing to wait for America’s backing – and evidently giving up with the talks.

The decision to act without Trump’s stamp of approval also makes the US president look weak and flies in the face of Trump’s deal-making skills, something he has boasted about for years.

Displaced Palestinians fleeing northern Gaza carry their belongings along the coastal road toward southern Gaza, Tuesday, Sept. 9, 2025, after the Israeli army issued evacuation orders from Gaza City.
Displaced Palestinians fleeing northern Gaza carry their belongings along the coastal road toward southern Gaza, Tuesday, Sept. 9, 2025, after the Israeli army issued evacuation orders from Gaza City.

via Associated Press

This will all really rile a man so keen to secure the Nobel Peace Prize, especially as he has stood by Netanyahu’s side consistently while other allies in the west have started to question the catastrophic effects of Israel’s actions in the Middle East.

The BBC’s international editor Jeremy Bowen even suggested Trump has been “played” by Netanyahu.

Israel’s strikes could provoke further tensions in the Middle East too, particularly between Iran and Israel who have been holding a ceasefire since late June.

Iran’s foreign ministry said the attack was a “blatant violation of international law” and an “infringement upon the national sovereignty of Qatar and the Palestinian negotiators”.

It also stokes wider fears that Israel intends to continue a campaign of “score settling” for the October 7 raid – especially as the Qatari PM has said his country “reserves the right” to respond.

One thing is for sure: this is precisely the opposite of what Trump was hoping for.

Share Button

Spectator With Rainbow Flag Runs Onto Pitch At World Cup In Qatar

A football fan wearing a T-shirt emblazoned with the words ‘Save Ukraine’ and ‘Respect for Iranian Woman’ has run onto the pitch with a rainbow flag during the Portugal and Uruguay World Cup game in Qatar.

The rainbow flag is likely to be symbol of solidarity with the LGBTQ+ community. Homosexuality is illegal in Qatar, and Fifa has clamped down on attempts by teams and fans to show support for LGBTQ+ rights, with people complaining they’ve been barred from bringing items with rainbow colours into the grounds.

At the group H game on Monday, security officials brought the spectator down and he dropped the flag on the field before being escorted off the pitch. The referee then picked up the flag and left it on the sideline, where it stayed for a few moments before a worker came and collected it.

In the first week of the tournament, seven European teams lost the battle to wear multi-coloured One Love armbands during World Cup matches after Fifa threatened the countries with punishment.

Share Button

5 Embarrassing Moments For The Qatar World Cup In Its First 24 Hours

The 2022 World Cup in Qatar has been mired in controversy from the moment it was announced the tiny Persian Gulf country would be hosting the tournament 12 years ago. But while the football has now started, the negative headlines have yet to subside.

In the build-up, thousands of migrant workers died in the nation’s extreme heat and construction accidents building the stadiums for what The Times called the “biggest sportswashing coup” in history – referring to nations that host sporting events to distract from their human rights records.

At the last minute, all alcohol was banned in the stadiums – not surprising in a Muslim nation, but the wealthy can down whatever they want in their luxury stadium suites. What’s more, prior World Cup hosts Brazil and Russia also prohibited drinking in stadiums – but governing body FIFA successfully pressured both countries to lift those rules for the 2014 and 2018 tournaments respectively.

In a bizarre speech on Saturday, FIFA head Gianni Infantino defended Qatar’s human rights record, as he called Europeans hypocrites for complaining about it. He indicated he knew just how the oppressed in Qatar felt because he had been bullied as a boy – in Switzerland – for having red hair and freckles.

All this before a ball was kicked. And little more than 24 hours since the opening game, the action on the pitch has yet to provide much of a distraction.

1. Iran team send a message home

<img class="img-sized__img landscape" loading="lazy" alt="Iran players Ehsan Hajsafi, Alireza Beiranvand and Morteza Pouraliganji do not sing the national anthem before the World Cup match versus England.” width=”720″ height=”479″ src=”https://www.wellnessmaster.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/5-embarrassing-moments-for-the-qatar-world-cup-in-its-first-24-hours-4.jpg”>
Iran players Ehsan Hajsafi, Alireza Beiranvand and Morteza Pouraliganji do not sing the national anthem before the World Cup match versus England.

Sebastian Frej/MB Media via Getty Images

Against the backdrop of two months of protests in Iran, the country’s players didn’t sing their national anthem and didn’t celebrate their goals in the match against England – a brave act of solidarity given the repercussions they could receive from the hardline regime at home.

The protests in Iran were sparked by the death of a young woman in the custody of the morality police, and marks one of the boldest challenges to Iran’s clerical leaders since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. It has resulted in the deaths of at least 419 people, according Human Rights Activists in Iran, a group that has been monitoring the protests.

Meanwhile, in the stands, many Iranian fans showed solidarity with the protest movement – holding signs and flags at odds with the image the tournament hosts want to project.

Before international matches, Iran’s players usually sing the national anthem with the right hands on their heart. On Monday they stood silently, their arms draped around each other’s shoulders, prompting Iran’s state TV to cut from a close-up of the players’ faces to a wide shot of the pitch.

During the match, the players didn’t celebrate their two goals, something that has become common in Iranian league matches since the protests began.

2. Armband showdown

A stand-off over armbands is another flashpoint organisers of the tournament would rather have avoided.

The football associations of England and Wales, along with other European countries, announced they would not wear the rainbow-coloured One Love anti-discrimination armband in their World Cup matches after FIFA threatened them with sporting sanctions at the last minute. They feared a yellow card being issued for their captain.

Step forward BBC broadcaster Alex Scott.

The former Lioness defender was seen wearing a One Love armband on air as she presented the the BBC’s coverage in Doha.

The 38-year-old former wore the anti-discrimination symbol as England played Iran in their opening match.

.

Scott received praised for wearing the band from many.

Pride in Football, which represents LGBT+ fan groups in the UK, wrote on Twitter: “England may not be wearing the #OneLove armband, but @AlexScott is right now on BBC.

“This is more than just LGBTQ+ rights, this is Human Rights.”

Meanwhile, comedian Joe Lycett continues to call out David Beckham and his ambassadorship deal with Qatar.

3. Empty seats

Even the basic logistics were not running smoothly.

Several fans heading to the Enngland v Iran fixture endured ticketing problems as they attempted to enter the stadium, with some missing part of the game.

Concerns were also raised about the availability of food within the stadium and at the main fan park in central Doha.

<img class="img-sized__img landscape" loading="lazy" alt="Empty seats are seen inside the stadium after ticketing problems outside the stadium prior England v Iran.” width=”720″ height=”480″ src=”https://www.wellnessmaster.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/5-embarrassing-moments-for-the-qatar-world-cup-in-its-first-24-hours-6.jpg”>
Empty seats are seen inside the stadium after ticketing problems outside the stadium prior England v Iran.

Catherine Ivill via Getty Images

With the 4pm local time kick-off approaching, some supporters were frantically refreshing the official ticketing mobile app on their phones in a bid to have their QR code load.

This left them enduring some stressful and frustrating moments, with a group of England fans also seen arguing with officials as they kept being told entry to the queue was closed and repeatedly moved down to another entrance.

4. Rainbow bucket hats confiscated

First it was armbands, then it was headwear.

Female Wales supporters wearing rainbow bucket hats had them confiscated in Qatar ahead of the clash with the USA, according to fans.

Wales’ Rainbow Wall, a group of LGBTQ+ supporters, said male supporters wearing the hats were allowed to keep them but the items were taken from women.

Former Wales international footballer Laura McAllister, now a professor at Cardiff University, wrote on Twitter: “So, despite fine words from @FIFAWorldCup before event, @Cymru rainbow bucket hats confiscated at stadium, mine included.

“I had a conversation about this with stewards – we have video evidence. This #WorldCup2022 just gets better but we will continue stand up for our values.”

The bucket hat has become the must-have accessory for Wales fans over the past decade.

The yellow, green and red hats are worn in their thousands by the so-called Red Wall, with a rainbow version also produced.

Wales’ Rainbow Wall wrote: “Our rainbow bucket hat. We are so proud of them, but news on the ground tonight is our welsh female supporters wearing them in #Qatar are having them taken off them, not the men, just women.”

5. Qatar embarrassed on the pitch

On the pitch, things weren’t much better for the hosts.

Despite more than a decade of hothousing players for this moment, Qatar’s national team lost 2-0 in the tournament curtain-raiser against Ecuador on Sunday before more than 67,000 soccer fans.

It was the first time in the 92 years of the World Cup’s existence that the host nation’s team failed to win its opening game.

Share Button

Alex Scott Praised By Football Fans For Wearing One Love Armband During BBC’s World Cup Coverage

Alex Scott has been praised by football fans after she wore a “One Love” armband during the BBC’s coverage of the World Cup just hours after Fifa threatened sporting sanctions against players who did so.

On Monday morning, England, Wales and other European countries who had been set to wear the anti-discrimination armbands at the tournament in Qatar u-turned on their decision after Fifa said that they would introduce yellow cards to players who opted to wear them during matches.

The armbands were intended “to promote inclusion and send a message against discrimination of any kind”. In Qatar, same-sex relationships are illegal.

Former Lioness and England captain Alex was seen sporting the armband during a pitch-side discussion with Kelly Somers ahead of England’s opening World Cup match against Iran.

Alex made no mention of her armband but her powerful statement did not go unnoticed by fans watching.

A joint statement from seven national Football Associations, including the English and Welsh FAs, about the armbands said they could not put their players “in a position where they could face sporting sanctions”.

The statement read: “We are very frustrated by the Fifa decision which we believe is unprecedented.

“Fifa has been very clear that it will impose sporting sanctions if our captains wear the armbands on the field of play.

“We were prepared to pay fines that would normally apply to breaches of kit regulations and had a strong commitment to wearing the armband.

“However, we cannot put our players in the situation where they might be booked or even forced to leave the field of play.

“Our players and coaches are disappointed – they are strong supporters of inclusion and will show support in other ways.”

Captains of teams are allowed to wear “No Discrimination” armbands for the duration of the World Cup.

On Sunday, Alex spoke about LGBT rights in Qatar during the opening of the BBC’s coverage of the World Cup.

She said: “A whole heap of fans from around the world from the LGBTQ+ community not wanting to travel here…

“We reference (FIFA president) Gianni Infantino from what he said… you are not gay, you will never understand travelling to a country where you are fearing for your life just because of who you choose to love.

“To keep saying football is for everyone, we sit here and it’s not, because people have not been able to travel to watch their teams, to support their teams, out of fear.”

Infantino delivered an hour-long speech in a pre-tournament press conference in Doha in which he declared “today I feel gay” and “I feel (like) a migrant worker” before taking aim at European critics of Qatar.

Share Button