Loggerhead sea turtles host diverse community of miniature organisms

There is a world of life on the backs of loggerhead sea turtles, and it’s more abundant and diverse than scientists knew.

An international team led by Florida State University researchers found that more than double the number of organisms than previously observed live on the shells of these oceanic reptiles, raising important questions about loggerhead sea turtle ecology and conservation.

The study was published in the journal Diversity.

“This suggests loggerhead turtles are hotspots for organism abundance and biodiversity,” said Jeroen Ingels, a researcher with the Florida State University Coastal and Marine Laboratory and lead author of the study. “We suspect that larger organisms that are able to form structures serve as habitats for microscopic creatures and allow for greater levels of abundance and biodiversity.”

Researchers discovered this organism diversity by sampling meiofauna, which are organisms roughly between 1 millimeter and about 0.032 millimeters in size.

The researchers specifically focused on a type of aquatic meiofauna called nematodes, also known as roundworms. Previous research had not considered these tiny creatures when surveying the communities of organisms that live on the backs of loggerhead sea turtles.

“To find nematodes on loggerhead turtle carapaces is no surprise, but when we compared their numbers and diversity to those from other hard surfaces or even on marine plant life, we realized their carapaces abound with this microscopic life, the extent to which had hardly been documented in the past,” Ingels said.

The FSU researchers, together with a team from Brazil led by Professor Giovani dos Santos and Professor Yirina Valdes, sampled the shells from 24 loggerhead turtles that migrated to Florida’s St. George Island in the summer of 2018 to lay eggs.

The researchers examined a forward, middle and posterior section of each shell to see if the different areas had different microscopic communities. To collect their samples, they removed barnacles, then scraped the shells and sponged them down to carefully gather every living creature.

They found thousands of meiofauna organisms. One turtle had more than 146,000 individual organisms living on its carapace. Researchers also found that the posterior section of the shells, closest to the rear flippers, had different communities and a higher diversity of species.

Previous studies of loggerheads had found fewer than 100 different species of any kind living on their shells. By including the nematodes found in this new study, the researchers added at least 111 new species to the list of organisms that can live on the backs of loggerheads. That count doesn’t include other types of meiofauna, meaning the number could be even greater.

The research may help explain a paradox around these miniature creatures: How can the same types of aquatic meiofauna be found in different parts of the world, hundreds or even thousands of miles away? Researchers think they are able to travel large distances on the backs of sea turtles, which could help explain their widespread distribution.

The researchers also found that individual turtles harbor significantly different communities of meiofauna living on their shells.

“Were these turtles colonized by microorganisms in different places?” asked Ingels. “It’s exciting because it means we may be able to infer where loggerheads have been based on the microscopic communities on their shells.”

Tens of thousands of microscopic organisms can colonize loggerhead turtles, which visit remote coasts and beaches during their migration. It makes sense that there would be a connection between the locations frequented by the turtles and the places where the same meiofauna are found, Ingels said. A better understanding of that link could help inform conservation practices for these reptiles.

“Information on key areas used by loggerhead turtles is crucial to inform their management, as it helps identify key threats that they are exposed to,” said Mariana Fuentes, a co-author of the article and assistant professor of oceanography in the FSU Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Science.

This research was funded by the Florida Sea Turtle License Plate Grant and the PADI Foundation.

Story Source:

Materials provided by Florida State University. Original written by Bill Wellock. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Share Button

COVID-19 outbreak lasts days longer for each day’s delay in social distancing

AUSTIN, Texas — A new analysis of COVID-19 outbreaks in 58 cities has found that places that took longer to begin implementing social distancing measures spent more time with the virus rapidly spreading than others that acted more quickly.

In a new paper from epidemiological researchers at The University of Texas at Austin, now in press with the CDC’s journal Emerging Infectious Diseases, researchers studied cities throughout China and analyzed when first cases were detected, when social distancing measures were implemented and when the outbreak was considered contained. The team found that every day a city delayed in implementing social distancing measures after the appearance of a first case added 2.4 days to the length of the outbreak.

“Every day saves time, saves effort, saves people becoming infected and probably saves lives,” said Lauren Ancel Meyers, a professor of integrative biology who leads the UT Austin COVID-19 Modeling Consortium. “This is particularly important as we think about the coming weeks and months.”

The findings are applicable both to communities experiencing their first outbreaks and those that may see a resurgence in the coming months, Meyers said. Waiting a week after early signs of resurgence might require about 17 more days of social distancing to slow the spread of the pandemic, according to the data.

“It will be difficult to consider strict interventions again, but acting early upon signs of resurgence will mean fewer days of social distancing orders,” said Spencer Fox, associate director of the UT Austin COVID-19 Modeling Consortium and co-author on the paper.

“Our findings have implications for the timing of interventions in U.S. cities,” Meyers said. “The impact of delays may be particularly important for communities that are prone to rapid transmission, such as nursing homes, colleges, schools and jails. We need concrete plans for when and how to respond to rising cases to prevent unnecessarily long and costly restrictions.”

To determine when an outbreak had been contained, scientists look at case counts and determine the reproduction number, a measurement that shows how many people will be infected by one infectious person. If the reproduction number drops below 1, scientists consider the outbreak contained.

Other studies into the impact of delaying social distancing measures have used modeling to estimate a link between the time of measures being taken and the effect on outbreaks. By contrast, this study used on-the-ground data to determine the link between cities taking measures to contain the virus and rates of the virus spreading.

The study was not able to determine which social distancing measures were most effective, but it showed that the timing of the first measure, regardless of the type, had a big impact.

“We provide direct, data-driven evidence that the timing of interventions has a substantial impact on how long an outbreak lasts, how effective our interventions are and, ultimately, how many people might be infected and die from the virus,” Meyers said.

Although the study looked at cities experiencing the earliest days of an outbreak, the findings are also relevant for cities in the middle of an outbreak, Meyers said.

###

In addition to Fox and Meyers, Zhanwei Du of UT Austin, Xiaoke Xu of Dalian Minzu University, Lin Wang of the University of Cambridge, Benjamin J. Cowling of the University of Hong Kong and Alison P. Galvani of the Yale School of Public Health contributed to the research. The research was funded by the National Institutes of Health and the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Story Source:

Materials provided by University of Texas at Austin. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Share Button

Social Contracts

So we’re going through some upheaval now.

I’ve seen lots of polarized opinions about what’s been happening with respect to the protests and riots, but most of what I’ve seen doesn’t resonate with me. I find it difficult to subscribe to other people’s meanings in this area.

However, I found what Trevor Noah shared about this to be insightful. Normally he shares in a comedic style, but this video includes some deep and reflective commentary.

[embedded content]

I especially liked what he shared about social contracts.

A social contract includes many aspects, such as rules and laws, behavioral standards, expectations, values, and consequences.

I violated the social contract with the State of California quite a lot when I was younger, which led to being arrested multiple times. For a while I was okay with those consequences… until eventually I wasn’t.

I also violated the social contract with the religion that I grew up with, which led to abandoning that religion. It was a bad contract to begin with, so I was glad to terminate it.

Other times I violated aspects of social contracts more consciously, including those that expected me to get a job and to be monogamous. No regrets there.

But there is one social contract that I hold sacred, which is the contract I have with reality itself. A key aspect of this contract is that I always give reality the benefit of the doubt and don’t turn against it. Whatever reality dishes out, I do my best to accept it and roll with it.

This is a difficult one to uphold, but I find it essential for having a sane and functional life. It challenges me to keep seeking the personal meaning within any situation. It makes me ask repeatedly: How is what’s arising an invitation to grow?

I can’t answer that for other people. I can’t tell others what to think and feel and what the “correct” way to interpret current events are. The interpretation is personal. It’s your job to figure that out for yourself. If you look to others to answer this for you, you’ll be disappointed. Only your own answers can satisfy you.

I can share how I interpret the events in ways that enable me to honor my social contract with reality. Just don’t expect my meaning to be meaningful for you.

I see anger, violence, and upheaval, sparked in part by a violation of people’s values and expectations. I see the President hiding in his bunker and Tweeting his usual idiocy instead of leadership. I see Mark Zuckerberg’s own team members turning against him for his weak response. I don’t see the pathways emerging to create real solutions from the current situation, just escalating cycles of what we’ve already been through.

This makes me wonder what those pathways might be. I sense the pathways to growth and improvement will be in the direction of caring, empathy, and compassion. There is some of that in the current picture, but it seems more in the background and not in the foreground. So the personal meaning I see here is that caring needs to be moved into the foreground. The voice of caring is asking for fuller expression.

Caring is a big part of my work, but work itself can sometimes push the caring aspect out of the foreground of my life. So I’ve opted to give this voice of caring more space in my life this month.

Starting today, I’m doing a 30-day challenge to stop working by 4pm each weekday (other than 2 days when I have conflicting commitments that I’ll honor) and then devote 2 hours to exploring something that calls to my heart and feelings – something not directly work-related and with no expectation of being turned into a work product. Just let the heart lead, and follow it where it wants to go. Tune into what I care about, and engage with those parts of life more fully.

This time may include meditating to listen deeply to my emotions, practicing music, having meaningful conversations, acts of kindness, or anything else that feels like an exploration of what I care about. It’s not a head-based exploration, so I won’t map it out in advance. I’ll simply carve out the time and ask my heart what it wants to explore and experience each day for a couple of hours, and I’ll flow into action with whatever comes up.

I sense that if I want to express more caring outwardly, I need to get more in touch with it inwardly. So I want to build up my caring muscles and give them some extra exercise this month. Bring this part of life to the foreground, so it has more of a voice.

This feels aligned to me right now. While it may not look as edgy as yelling at people on social media or setting stuff on fire, it does feel edgy to me, and it feels like a good way to honor my social contract with reality. I know from experience that exploring the voice of caring isn’t a safe and predictable path. It’s a harder voice to listen to than many people realize.

Share Button

Coronavirus: ‘More than two million’ waiting for cancer care in UK

More than 23,000 cancers could have gone undiagnosed during lockdown, Cancer Research UK says.

Share Button

Health24.com | SA involved in massive global study on effects of Covid-19 pandemic – and you can play your part

  • Study looking at both physical and mental health effects of pandemic
  • Researchers hoping to collect information from more than 100 000 people
  • In South Africa, study being led by Stellenbosch University

The Covid-19 pandemic is a double crisis: as much as the virus is a global threat to physical health, it has also quickly become a challenge to mental health. And, as resilient as we may be during this bizarre time, the effects of lockdown and quarantine can be especially tough for those who don’t have strong support systems. By the end of March, more than 100 countries worldwide had instituted either a full or partial lockdown, the BBC notes.

The Collaborative Outcomes study on Health and Functioning during Infection Times (COH-FIT) is currently running a study that is measuring the impact of the pandemic on people’s physical and mental health worldwide. It is the largest global study of its kind, and is being launched by over 200 international investigators, led by Professor Christoph Correll from the US/Germany, and Dr Marco Solmi from Italy.

Through a survey, the study aims to collect information from over 100 000 participants from more than 40 countries and six continents. In South Africa, the study has been approved by Stellenbosch University’s Health Research Ethics Committee and is being led by Professor Soraya Seedat and Dr Georgina Spies. Health24 chats to Dr Spies about the study.

Health crisis caused by Covid-19: Why the study is critical

Both the lockdown and the pandemic have unintended negative consequences, explains Spies, and says that it will arguably have a severe short-term and long-term impact on the mental health of the world’s population.

“It is vital that we detect and treat psychiatric symptoms in people with Covid-19 and their contacts. The outbreak of SARS in 2003 has been referred to as a mental health catastrophe. Research shows that 30 months after the SARS outbreak, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was the most prevalent long-term psychiatric condition, followed by depressive disorders. Approximately 60% of survivors met criteria for any psychiatric disorder.

“This highlights the importance of addressing the population-level mental health impact of Covid-19. Attention also needs to be given to risk groups. Currently, billions of people worldwide are either in full or partial lockdown, which has been termed the ‘world’s greatest psychological experiment’, and predicted to result in a secondary epidemic of burnouts and stress-related absenteeism.”

Increase risk in mental illness expected

In light of strict measures taken by governments during the Covid-19 crisis, Spies says that not only is an increased risk of new episodes of mental illness expected, but that health professionals also expect increased risk of recurrence in those with pre-existing mental illness. Financial stress is another key challenge for millions of people during the lockdown, and Spies says that due to the economic crisis caused by the pandemic, we can also expect negative mental health consequences.

“We know from research that severe economic recession has been linked to population-level psychological distress, including the emergence, and worsening, of mood, anxiety and substance-related disorders and suicidal behaviour.

Spies also mentions research that shows that during other epidemics such as SARS, MERS, H1N1 and Ebola, there was the significant, long-lasting psychological impact of being in quarantine, which eventually contributed to after-effects such as posttraumatic stress symptoms, depression, and alcohol abuse, among others. “As with other mass traumatic events in countries around the world, Covid-19 is expected to result in PTSD in a proportion of South Africans,” Spies adds.

Strong likelihood of targeted therapy

The resources needed to deal with the mental health consequences of this virus will likely place an additional burden on an already resource-limited mental and physical healthcare system, Spies says. Study researchers, therefore, aim to help identify potential therapeutic targets to prevent poor health outcomes, and to also increase chances of improved outcomes in particularly vulnerable individuals. Once the data is gathered, the researchers will then be able to determine where resources should be allocated to make the biggest difference.

“Interventions for both the general population and for vulnerable groups such as healthcare workers, women, youth, the elderly, and the mentally ill, refugees, migrants, and people living with disabilities are needed during the lockdown and through the different stages of the pandemic. A comprehensive set of multi-sectoral interventions will be necessary in this country. These interventions should target mental health, well-being and resilience,” explains Spies. 

Developed vs. developing countries: the difference in impact 

Although developed countries like the US and Italy have been among the hardest hit during this pandemic, the impact is expected to be a bigger disaster for developing nations. Spies explains: 

“More than 50% of South Africans live below the poverty line. Even with government-led intervention packages aimed at mitigating the negative economic impact of Covid-19 in South Africa, the economic repercussions will be enormous. There is no definitive evidence yet, but poor South Africans are likely to disproportionately bear the physical and mental health, and social and economic consequences of this virus.” 

How long the COH-FIT study will run

Researchers will be collecting data to assess the acute effects of the pandemic and related quarantine measures for as long as Covid-19 is evolving, Spies tells us, adding that the study will collect information now, as well as six and 12 months after the pandemic is declared over by the WHO, so that they can assess its chronic effects on the population.

“We must not forget about the potentially pervasive mental health impact of this epidemic,” Spies says.

To help the research team gather data, please take the survey at www.coh-fit.com.

READ | Coronavirus in SA: All the confirmed cases

READ | OPINION | The mental health effects of Covid-19 are as important to address as the physical effects

READ | Looking after your mental health during the coronavirus crisis

Image: Getty/damircudic

Share Button

Health24.com | Baby boom after pandemic lockdowns? Maybe not

It’s happened before: Couples stuck at home during blizzards, hurricanes or other natural disasters enjoy some “alone time” – and a baby boom follows.

But a new survey from researchers at the University of Florence in Italy suggests the same probably won’t unfold during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Why?

“What we found the main reasons that led people to not wanting to conceive included worries related to future economic difficulties and consequences on pregnancy,” said study author Elisabetta Micelli, from the university’s Assisted Reproduction Technologies Center.

The researchers conducted nearly 1 500 online interviews and found that nearly 82% of those surveyed said they didn’t plan to conceive during the coronavirus pandemic.

Fear of future instabilities

The survey was conducted in the third week of the lockdown in Italy and included men and women in a stable heterosexual relationship for at least one year.

The findings were published early in May in the Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Of the 268 participants who said that, prior to the pandemic, they had plans to have a child, more than one-third abandoned their intentions when the pandemic struck. The main reasons were worries about future economic struggles (58%) and any potential consequences on pregnancy (58%) from the new coronavirus.

Even though almost half of those who responded to the survey had not lost their jobs or income, “the fear of imminent and future economic instabilities led those who were searching for a pregnancy to stop their intention in 58% of cases,” Micelli said in a journal news release.

Interestingly, 140 (11.5%) of the participants – mostly women – expressed a new desire for parenthood during quarantine, with the main reasons being “the will for change” (50%) and “the need for positivity” (40%).

But only six of the 140 (4.3%) actually tried to get pregnant during the lockdown.

No decrease in sex

“Again, fear of consequences on pregnancy in addition to the economic impact on families are probably the reasons why almost the whole group of couples who unexpectedly started to express a desire for parenthood during quarantine did not translate this dream into a concrete attempt,” said study co-author Gianmartin Cito, a specialist training in urology.

The study also asked participants about their levels of sexual activity and found that two-thirds of those who didn’t express a wish to conceive before or during the pandemic reported no decrease in sex. The same was true for 60% of people already trying to conceive.

It’s “unknown whether these findings will result in a substantial modification of birth rate in the near future,” the authors concluded.

Image credit: Unsplash

Share Button

Health24.com | Hydroxychloroquine worsens odds for cancer patients with Covid-19

As the evidence piles up that a malaria drug touted as a possible coronavirus treatment by President Donald Trump may instead harm patients, a new study shows the same might hold true for cancer patients with Covid-19.

Researchers found that cancer patients with Covid-19 who receive both hydroxychloroquine and the antibiotic azithromycin have a higher risk of death than those who aren’t given the two drugs.

Of the 928 patients in the study, 13% died within 30 days of being diagnosed with Covid-19. After adjusting for certain factors, the researchers concluded that patients with progressing cancer were 5.2 times more likely to die within 30 days than those in remission or with no evidence of cancer.

Patients who received the combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin to treat Covid-19 had a nearly threefold higher risk of death within 30 days than those who didn’t receive either drug, the investigators found.

Early and evolving data

Patients who received the two drugs and later died were more likely to: have had slightly reduced daily physical function; have received cancer therapy less than two weeks before being diagnosed with Covid-19; have Rh-positive blood type; be of non-Hispanic ethnicity; and to be taking cholesterol-lowering statins.

The study will be presented virtually at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). Such research is considered preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.

“This is early and evolving data, and more time and analysis will be needed to confirm and expand on these findings,” said lead author Dr Jeremy Warner, an associate professor of medicine and biomedical informatics at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tennessee.

“Right now, we’re working to quickly get information about why some patients with cancer become infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and identify the factors that affect disease severity and death. We’re also interested in the effects of treatments that are being used to treat patients with cancer who have Covid-19,” Warner said in an ASCO news release.

“While these findings are provocative, we believe that … carefully planned prospective studies are needed to truly demonstrate the risk or benefit of these drugs,” Warner added.

Medication has no benefit

Safety concerns over hydroxychloroquine prompted the World Health Organization to remove the drug from a global trial of potential Covid-19 therapies earlier this week.

Several other studies have also found the medication has no benefit and could possibly harm Covid-19 patients.

Still, Trump said on Sunday he had just finished taking a two-week course of the malaria drug to guard against Covid-19 infection after two White House staffers tested positive for the coronavirus.

In the meantime, ASCO president Dr Howard Burris III said more research is needed into the care of cancer patients stricken by Covid-19.

“The cancer care community urgently needs data on the effects of Covid-19, specifically in patients with cancer,” he said. “How we improve the care we provide for these patients and reduce the number of deaths and severe consequences associated with this disease are among the top questions.”

Image credit: Getty Images

Share Button

Coronavirus: UK exceeds 200,000 testing capacity target

The UK had capacity to conduct 205,634 tests on Saturday, reaching its target one day early.

Share Button

Conscious Conversation – Steve Pavlina and LuAnn Buechler

Here’s the video of my Conscious Conversation call with transformational coach, trainer, speaker, hugger, and long-time friend LuAnn Buechler.

We had a lively chat about LuAnn’s ihug Movement, sharing hugs, creating unity instead of partisanship, adapting to coronavirus, setting intentions, and many more fascinating topics.

[embedded content]

Here are some related links:

Enjoy the conversation. 🙂

Share Button

Coronavirus: Who should be shielding?

People most at risk of needing hospital treatment if they get coronavirus are being asked to stay home.

Share Button