Scientists discover a bacterial kill switch and it could change the fight against superbugs

Scientists have revealed how viruses that infect bacteria shut down MurJ, a protein essential for building the bacterial cell wall. Remarkably, different viruses evolved separate proteins that all block MurJ in the same way, highlighting it as a promising new antibiotic target.

The findings appear in the February 26 issue of Nature. The research was led by Yancheng Evelyn Li, a graduate student in the lab of Bil Clemons at Caltech. Clemons, the Arthur and Marian Hanisch Memorial Professor of Biochemistry, is the corresponding author.

The Urgent Need for New Antibiotics

Bacteria evolve quickly, and that adaptability is fueling a growing public health crisis. As Clemons explains, “Evolution is powerful, and in bacteria, resistance to antibiotics develops quickly. This means that we now deal with bacteria that are resistant to all the medicines that we have.” He adds, “In the USA alone, tens of thousands of people die every year from antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections, and that number is rising rapidly. We need new antibiotics to combat this.”

With existing drugs losing effectiveness, researchers are searching for entirely new bacterial weak points.

Targeting the Bacterial Cell Wall

One long standing focus has been the pathway bacteria use to construct peptidoglycan, the rigid material that forms their cell wall. This process, called the peptidoglycan biosynthesis pathway, is especially attractive because peptidoglycan is found in bacteria but not in human cells. As Clemons notes, “Peptidoglycan is a unique feature of bacteria, and that makes it an attractive antibiotic target.”

Several antibiotics already disrupt this pathway. Penicillin, discovered by Alexander Fleming in the mid 20th century, blocks a late stage of peptidoglycan production. Related drugs such as amoxicillin work in a similar way.

Key Proteins MraY, MurG, and MurJ

Three essential proteins drive the movement of peptidoglycan building blocks across the bacterial inner membrane: MraY, MurG, and MurJ. These proteins help transport the components needed to assemble the cell wall outside the inner membrane barrier. If any one of them fails, peptidoglycan cannot be produced and the bacterium dies, making them promising drug targets.

Although researchers understand much about how these proteins function, Clemons points out that important mechanistic details remain unclear.

At present, no approved drugs directly inhibit these three proteins. Still, Clemons says there is potential. “We do know that we can find small molecules, either derived from nature or synthesized in chemical libraries, that will inhibit these proteins. Excitingly, recent discoveries have shown that bacteriophages have figured out how to target this pathway.”

How Bacteriophages Break Through Bacterial Defenses

Bacteriophages, or phages, are viruses that infect bacteria. To survive, they must enter a bacterial cell, replicate, and then escape to infect others. Breaking out requires getting through the peptidoglycan layer. Clemons explains, “Getting back out means that they have to get past the peptidoglycan layer. Because it acts like chainmail, the phages get stuck if they can’t break through it.”

The Clemons lab studies small phages that contain single stranded DNA or RNA. These viruses have compact genomes and rely on simple strategies to kill bacteria. In 2023, the team reported in Science on φX174, a phage with a long research history at Caltech.

Viral Proteins That Disable MurJ

Small phages rely on specialized protein antibiotics called single-gene lysis proteins, or Sgls (pronounced like “sigils”), to kill bacteria. Li and Clemons have focused on Sgls that target MurJ, one of the key cell wall proteins.

MurJ acts as a flippase. It transports peptidoglycan precursors from the inside of the cell across the membrane so they can be incorporated into the growing cell wall. Earlier work from collaborators showed that two unrelated Sgls, SglM and SglPP7, both kill bacteria by blocking MurJ.

To understand how this happens, Li used cryo electron microscopy at Caltech’s Beckman Institute Biological and Cryogenic Transmission Electron Microscopy (Cryo-EM) Resource Center. Flippases such as MurJ move molecules by alternately exposing them to each side of the membrane without forming a permanent opening. When MurJ binds its cargo inside the cell, it changes shape to release the molecule on the outside.

Li found that both SglM and SglPP7 attach to a groove in MurJ, preventing the structural shift required for transport.

“It is clear that both of these Sgls bind to MurJ in an outward-facing conformation, locking it into this position,” Li says. Researchers are encouraged by this because the outward-facing form of MurJ is exposed to the surrounding environment, which could make it more accessible to future drugs than a conformation that faces inward.

Convergent Evolution Highlights a Promising Drug Target

Clemons says the result was surprising for another reason. “These peptides, which have no evolutionary links to each other, have both figured out how to target MurJ in a very similar way. These are two examples of convergent evolution, in which different evolutionary paths arrive at the same solution. We were surprised!”

Because viruses evolve rapidly, the team believes many more phages likely carry similar Sgls. Phages are relatively easy to isolate, and studying their genomes could reveal additional biological insights and new antibiotic targets.

In the Nature study, the researchers analyzed another phage genome with the help of a collaborator. They identified a new Sgl called SglCJ3 (from a genome sequence that is predicted to be a phage and is called Changjiang3) and examined it using cryo electron microscopy. Li determined the structure of SglCJ3 bound to MurJ and found that it also locks the protein in the same outward-facing conformation.

“This is a third genome that evolved a distinct peptide to inhibit the same target in a similar way,” Clemons says. “It is the first strong evidence that evolution identifies MurJ as a great target for killing bacteria, which means we should follow evolution’s lead and develop therapeutics that target MurJ. This demonstrates the power of basic biology to help us solve problems in medicine. Our path is set on leveraging Sgl discovery, and we hope to continue to be supported to turn these concepts into realities.”

Authors and Funding

The paper is titled “Convergent MurJ flippase inhibition by phage lysis proteins.” In addition to Clemons and Li, the authors include Caltech graduate student Grace F. Baron and Francesca S. Antillon, Karthik Chamakura, and Ry Young of Texas A&M University. The research was supported by the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, the National Institutes of Health, the G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Foundation, and the Center for Phage Technology at Texas A&M, jointly sponsored by Texas A&M AgriLife.

Share Button

I need 120 pills a week to deal with the agony caused by vaginal mesh

Kerry Watson is one of 25 women to get compensation after operations done by a single surgeon.

Share Button

I take 120 tablets a week after mesh operation

Twenty-five women have received compensation following gynaecological surgery.

Share Button

James Webb reveals a barred spiral galaxy shockingly early in the Universe

A research team led by Daniel Ivanov, a physics and astronomy graduate student in the Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences at Pitt, has identified a strong candidate for one of the earliest known spiral galaxies with a stellar bar. These bright, elongated structures can strongly influence how galaxies grow and change over time. The Milky Way itself contains a stellar bar at its center.

The newly studied galaxy, named COSMOS-74706, appears to have existed about 11.5 billion years ago. By analyzing its light, researchers were able to determine its place in cosmic history and narrow down when barred structures may have first formed in the universe.

“This galaxy was developing bars 2 billion years after the birth of the universe,” Ivanov said. “Two billion years after the Big Bang.”

The results were presented at the 247th meeting of the American Astronomical Society.

What Is a Stellar Bar?

As the name suggests, a stellar bar is a straight, elongated feature that stretches across the central region of a spiral galaxy. “A stellar bar is a linear feature at the center of the galaxy,” Ivanov said. Rather than being a single object, the bar is made up of tightly packed stars and gas. When viewed from above or below the galaxy’s disk, this alignment creates the appearance of a bright line cutting through the middle.

These bars are more than just visually striking. They can shape a galaxy’s long term development by channeling gas from the outer regions inward. This inward flow can fuel the supermassive black hole at the galaxy’s core and reduce star formation across the surrounding disk.

Why This Discovery Stands Out

Other teams have previously reported possible barred spiral galaxies from even earlier periods. However, those findings relied on less precise measurements of redshift. In contrast, COSMOS-74706 was confirmed using spectroscopy, which provides more reliable distance data. In some earlier cases, the galaxy’s light was also distorted by passing near a massive object, an effect known as gravitational lensing.

In essence, Ivanov said, “It’s the highest redshift, spectroscopically confirmed, unlensed barred spiral galaxy.”

Although the galaxy dates back to a very early era, Ivanov was not entirely surprised. Computer simulations have suggested that stellar bars could begin forming at redshift 5, or roughly 12.5 billion years ago. Still, he noted that such objects are not expected to be common at that stage of cosmic history.

“In principle, I think that this is not an epoch in which you expect to find many of these objects. It helps to constrain the timescales of bar formation. And it’s just really interesting.”

Powered by the James Webb Space Telescope

The research relied in part on observations from the NASA/ESA/CSA James Webb Space Telescope. Data were obtained through the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-03127, which is supported by NASA. The project also received support from the Brinson Foundation.

Share Button

Why Labour MPs Want Keir Starmer Out Before It Is Too Late: ‘He’s Burying The Party’

“It feels like an out of body experience, watching your party dying in slow motion,” the Labour MP told HuffPost UK.

He was speaking shortly after it was confirmed that Labour had come third in the Gorton and Denton by-election, a seat which the party won by nearly 13,500 votes barely 18 months ago.

To make matters worse, the Green Party came first, followed by Reform UK, an outcome polling expert Sir John Curtice described as “the worst possible result for the prime minister”.

“Can’t wait to hear how this is someone else’s fault,” said one MP. “If they try and blame the local operation or MPs, I’ll lose any respect I have for them.

“Polling day was incredibly well-run, but you can’t have a practical response to a crisis of leadership.”

Labour spent the past month insisting that only they could beat Reform, only for voters in the Manchester constituency to deliver an almighty raspberry to the PM.

If most Labour MPs hadn’t already decided that Starmer’s removal from office was a necessary first step for the party’s recovery, they certainly do now.

“He’s burying the Labour Party,” said one backbencher, succinctly.

Another senior figure told HuffPost UK: “Keir needs to be removed. The party has to act.”

Neil Duncan-Jordan told Times Radio: “If Keir Starmer is seen as a block when you go out and knock on doors – if people say to you, they’ll vote Labour, but they won’t vote Labour if he’s the leader – then he’s the block to us winning. And from a purely pragmatic, electoral strategic view, you have to remove that block

“Now, I’m not saying you do that this morning. I’m saying that we need to be serious about winning again. And, if there’s a block to winning again, then we need to look at how we remove that block.”

Fellow left-winger Clive Lewis said Starmer was “an interim prime minister”.

“How long that interim is will be up to the Parliamentary Labour Party,” he said. “He will not be here for very long, he does not deserve to be here much longer.”

Lewis, who said replacing Starmer with Blairite health secretary Wes Streeting would be “more of the same”, added: “We need a radical reset, fundamental change, or we will have a Reform government.

“And I’m afraid my colleagues and the rest of the party need to understand that.”

Even Angela Rayner, who has tended to keep her counsel since resigning as deputy prime minister last year, went public with a plea for Starmer to change course.

“This result must be a wake up call,” she said in a post on X. “It’s time to really listen – and to reflect. Voters want the change that we promised – and they voted for.

“If we want to unrig the system, if we want to make the change we were sent into Government to make, we have to be braver.”

Green Party candidate and winner Hannah Spencer celebrates at an election rally with supporters.
Green Party candidate and winner Hannah Spencer celebrates at an election rally with supporters.

Ryan Jenkinson via Getty Images

The PM himself appeared deaf to the concerns of his colleagues, insisting that he will not change course and even suggesting that voters had been duped into backing the Greens.

In a letter to his fractious MPs, he said: “The Greens were able to capitalise on an endorsement from George Galloway to win over enough voters to push them over the line.

“Their willingness to welcome Galloway’s divisive, sectarian politics is a sign that the Greens are not the harmless environmentalists they pretend to be.”

“He looks ridiculous and totally disconnected,” said a Labour MP in response.

A Green source said: “Starmer is clearly coming to the end of his premiership, one that he has barely been clinging to. He has learnt nothing from the Greens’ stunning victory and once again he is tone deaf.

“His only answer now is to smear the voters as extremists who wanted the hope and change that he is failing to offer. It is not the election result or voters who are disappointing, it is his Labour government that is beyond disappointing.”

Starmer’s decision to block popular Manchester mayor Andy Burnham from standing to be Labour’s candidate also came in for criticism, but one party insider defended that decision.

He said: “Does anyone really believe Andy wouldn’t have invented his own foreign policy for the campaign, particularly after a week of knocking doors?

“That would have been the start of a leadership campaign before even being elected, which vindicates Keir’s decision even more.”

Another MP who was regularly on the doors in the constituency insisted the Burnham issue “was not mentioned once” by local voters.

The MP added: “We shouldn’t read much into the result. Lots of voters who would back us in a general election wanted to send a message to the party by voting Green.”

That view was echoed by Chris Hopkins, political research director at pollsters Savanta, who said “we need to be careful not to jump to too many conclusions, and I’d encourage Labour MPs not to overreact to this”.

He added: “Yes, it’s bad, but nothing that played out last night should come as a huge surprise, given the national polling and unpopularity of the government.

“While the temptation to act and publicly criticise Starmer having seen it play out for real at a by-election must be strong, this does need to not be the straw that breaks the camel’s back in terms of Starmer’s leadership of the party.

“Starmer must try to remain steadfast to his cause and maintain party discipline. He’s got to convince his own MPs that what happened last night is not an existential crisis, is not indicative of what could happen in their own seat at the next election and is just a by-election.

“Yes, the result is bad on paper but doesn’t really affect Labour’s parliamentary dominance, and could well be completely forgotten about in a few years time.”

Nevertheless, Hopkins conceded that Starmer will be in an “incredibly weak” position if May’s elections in Scotland, Wales and England are as bad as Labour MPs fear.

“His security is more down to the lack of an obviously challenger, especially while Burnham remains outside parliament, and I guess in that respect Starmer’s decision to block him running is probably remains the right one.

“Losing one by-election but keeping your closest rival on the outside looking in is probably an acceptable outcome.”

Unfortunately for Starmer, very few Labour MPs are as sanguine about the result as Hopkins.

The PM will limp on until May, largely because there is no time to replace him before then.

But a set of results even remotely as cataclysmic as Gorton and Denton will surely bring the curtain down on his ill-starred time in No.10.

Share Button

On 3 March, The ‘Worm Moon’ Will Turn Blood Red

On 3 March 2026, the “worm moon” – a name given to the full moon in March – will rise.

And due to an event called a total lunar eclipse, this year, it’s set to look deep red from some parts of the Earth.

What is a total lunar eclipse?

This can only happen during a full moon. It occurs when the Earth gets into a position right in between the moon and the sun, making the surface of the moon look dimmer.

When the moon moves into the inner part of the Earth’s shadow (its umbra) in a total lunar eclipse, the Earth’s atmosphere filters the light from the sun to the moon.

Why will March’s “blood moon” be red?

During a total lunar eclipse, the light on the moon has to pass through our atmosphere.

Because shorter waves of light, like blue and purple tones, scatter faster than their longer-length cousins, red and orange, the moon can look reddish or orange during the event.

“It’s as if all the world’s sunrises and sunsets are projected onto the Moon,” NASA said.

This is sometimes called a blood moon, thanks to the colour.

The more dust in our atmosphere, the redder the moon is likely to look.

When will the “blood moon” happen?

It’s set to happen on 3 March, 2026. And while the time the moon actually spends in the Earth’s umbra is just under an hour, Space.com said that “the show goes on for much longer than that”.

The eclipse will “peak” at 11:33am GMT. At this point, the moon will move closest to the centre of the Earth’s shadow, as part of the “eclipse maximum”.

Where can I see the March blood moon?

Sadly, it won’t be visible from the UK or Ireland – nor will it be seen from Africa or Europe.

But views from North America, the Pacific area, Australia, and parts of East Asia are expected to be particularly stunning.

Why is the March moon called the “worm moon”?

Per Royal Museums Greenwich, the name comes from Native Americans, who coined the term because of “the worm trails that would appear in the newly thawed ground” in March.

Other names include the death moon, crust moon, sap moon, and chaste moon.

And, of course, this month, it counts as a “blood moon” too.

Share Button

Claudia Winkleman Dismisses Claims ‘One Scandal Too Many’ Prompted Strictly Exit

Claudia Winkleman has insisted that the various controversies surrounding Strictly Come Dancing were not behind her decision to leave the show.

In October 2025, Claudia and her co-host Tess Daly shocked Strictly fans when, in the middle of the most recent series, they announced they would be stepping down as its presenters at the end of the year.

During a new interview with the Daily Mail, the Traitors host was asked if the pair’s decision to leave came after “one scandal too many” for the long-running BBC dance show, to which she responded: “Absolutely not.”

“It is a genuinely beautiful show to be part of. Almost every single person who’s taken part is happy they did,” she responded. “So no, it wasn’t that.”

Claudia also claimed that she and Tess had decided the most recent season of Strictly would be their last “about a year before” they made their official announcement.

Claudia Winkleman and Tess Daly in the Strictly Come Dancing studio last year
Claudia Winkleman and Tess Daly in the Strictly Come Dancing studio last year

Guy LevyCREDIT LINEBBC/Guy Levy

She said at the time: “Strictly is a magical, glittery, fake tanned train and it’s been a privilege to be a tiny part of it. The extraordinary talent of the dancers, the band, the hair and makeup and costume teams, the unbelievable production crew and creatives – all utterly amazing.

“I’ve always believed it’s best to leave a party before you’re fully ready to go and I know the new hosts will be magnificent, I look forward to watching them take Strictly to new heights.

“As for Tess – I’m so so lucky I got to stand next to you. You’re funny, kind, whip smart and a true friend and I love you.”

Following her Strictly exit, Claudia is currently gearing up for the debut of her new BBC talk show, made by the same team as The Graham Norton Show.

The launch date for the seven-part series was confirmed earlier this week, as well as the line-up of celebrity guests who’ll be joining Claudia in her first episode.

Meanwhile, a host of celebrities have been rumoured to be in the running to replace Tess and Claudia on Strictly, ahead of the show’s return in the autumn.

Share Button

MIT study finds Earth’s first animals were likely ancient sea sponges

Researchers at MIT have uncovered new chemical clues in extremely old rocks that suggest some of the earliest animals on Earth were likely ancestors of modern sea sponges.

Reporting in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the team describes the discovery of “chemical fossils” preserved in rocks more than 541 million years old. These chemical fossils are traces of biological molecules once produced by living organisms that were later buried, altered, and locked into sediment for hundreds of millions of years.

The newly identified molecules belong to a group called steranes, which are stable remnants of sterols such as cholesterol that form part of the cell membranes of complex life. By analyzing their structure, the scientists linked these steranes to demosponges, a major group of sea sponges. Today, demosponges appear in many shapes, sizes, and colors and live throughout the world’s oceans as soft filter feeders. Their ancient relatives were likely similar in being soft bodied marine organisms.

“We don’t know exactly what these organisms would have looked like back then, but they absolutely would have lived in the ocean, they would have been soft-bodied, and we presume they didn’t have a silica skeleton,” says Roger Summons, the Schlumberger Professor of Geobiology Emeritus in MIT’s Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences (EAPS).

The presence of these sponge specific chemical signatures strengthens the case that ancestors of demosponges were among the first animals to evolve, emerging well before most other major animal groups.

The research team includes lead author Lubna Shawar, a former MIT EAPS Crosby Postdoctoral Fellow who is now a research scientist at Caltech, along with Summons and colleagues Gordon Love of the University of California at Riverside, Benjamin Uveges of Cornell University, Alex Zumberge of GeoMark Research in Houston, Paco Cárdenas of Uppsala University in Sweden, and José Luis Giner of the State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry.

Revisiting a 2009 Discovery in Precambrian Rocks

This work builds on a study the group first published in 2009. At that time, they analyzed rocks from an outcrop in Oman and detected an unusually high concentration of steranes derived from 30-carbon (C30) sterols. These rare steroid molecules appeared to originate from ancient sea sponges.

The rocks dated to the Ediacaran Period, which lasted from about 635 million to 541 million years ago, just before the Cambrian Period when complex multicellular life rapidly diversified. The earlier findings suggested that sponges existed long before the Cambrian explosion and may have been among the planet’s earliest animals.

Not everyone agreed. Some researchers proposed that the C30 steranes might have been produced by other organisms or even formed through nonbiological geological processes.

The new study adds weight to the sponge hypothesis. The team identified another distinctive chemical fossil in the same Precambrian rocks that is highly likely to have come from living organisms rather than from chemistry alone.

Rare Sterols and the Search for Early Animal Life

As in their previous investigations, the researchers examined Ediacaran age rocks collected from drill cores and outcrops in Oman, western India, and Siberia. They searched for steranes, which are stable versions of sterols found in all eukaryotes (plants, animals, and any organism with a nucleus and membrane-bound organelles).

“You’re not a eukaryote if you don’t have sterols or comparable membrane lipids,” Summons says.

Sterols share a core structure made of four connected carbon rings. Different organisms modify that structure by adding carbon side chains and other chemical groups, depending on the genes they carry. In humans, cholesterol contains 27 carbon atoms, while plant sterols typically contain 29.

“It’s very unusual to find a sterol with 30 carbons,” Shawar says.

The earlier research had identified a 30-carbon sterol tied to a specific enzyme encoded by a gene common in demosponges. In the new analysis, the team realized that the same gene could also produce an even rarer 31-carbon sterol (C31). When they reexamined their rock samples, they detected abundant C31 steranes alongside the previously identified C30 forms.

“These special steranes were there all along,” Shawar says. “It took asking the right questions to seek them out and to really understand their meaning and from where they come.”

Laboratory Tests Confirm Biological Origin

To confirm the source, the scientists studied living demosponges and found that some species produce C31 sterols, the biological precursors of the C31 steranes preserved in rock. They then synthesized eight different C31 sterols in the laboratory to serve as reference compounds. After subjecting these molecules to conditions that mimic burial and geological transformation over millions of years, they compared the results with the ancient samples.

Only two of the eight synthesized sterols transformed into compounds that matched the C31 steranes found in the rocks. The absence of the other six products indicates that the molecules were not created by random chemical reactions in the environment.

Together, evidence from rock chemistry, modern sponges, and laboratory experiments supports the conclusion that the steranes originated from living organisms. Those organisms were most likely early ancestors of demosponges, which still retain the ability to produce similar compounds today.

“It’s a combination of what’s in the rock, what’s in the sponge, and what you can make in a chemistry laboratory,” Summons says. “You’ve got three supportive, mutually agreeing lines of evidence, pointing to these sponges being among the earliest animals on Earth.”

“In this study we show how to authenticate a biomarker, verifying that a signal truly comes from life rather than contamination or non-biological chemistry,” Shawar adds.

Expanding the Search for the First Animals

Now that C30 and C31 sterols appear to be reliable indicators of ancient sponges, the researchers plan to examine rocks from other parts of the world. So far, the samples indicate that these sponges lived during the Ediacaran Period. With additional material, the team hopes to pinpoint more precisely when some of the earliest animals first emerged.

This research was supported, in part, by the MIT Crosby Fund, the Distinguished Postdoctoral Fellowship program, the Simons Foundation Collaboration on the Origins of Life, and the NASA Exobiology Program.

Share Button

A lost moon may have created Titan and Saturn’s rings

New research suggests that Saturn’s brilliant rings and its largest moon, Titan, may share a violent past shaped by collisions between moons. Although NASA’s Cassini spacecraft transformed our understanding of Saturn during its 13 year mission, it also uncovered new puzzles, including the surprisingly young age of Saturn’s rings and Titan’s shifting orbit. A new study led by SETI Institute scientist Matija Ćuk proposes that these mysteries are connected and that Titan itself may have formed when two earlier moons merged.

Toward the end of its mission, Cassini measured how mass is distributed inside Saturn. That internal structure controls the planet’s slow wobble in space, known as precession. For many years, researchers believed Saturn’s precession matched Neptune’s, allowing their gravitational interactions to gradually tilt Saturn and make its rings more visible from Earth.

However, Cassini’s final measurements revealed that Saturn’s mass is more concentrated toward its center than scientists had expected. This subtle difference changes Saturn’s precession rate so that it no longer aligns with Neptune’s. To account for the mismatch, researchers at MIT and UC Berkeley proposed that Saturn once had an additional moon. According to their idea, that moon was flung away after a close encounter with Titan and later broke apart, creating the rings.

Hyperion’s Orbit Offers a Clue

The SETI Institute team tested whether such an extra moon could have moved close enough to Saturn to form the rings. Computer simulations showed that the most likely outcome was not ring formation directly, but a collision between the extra moon and Titan.

An important clue comes from Hyperion, Saturn’s small, irregularly shaped moon that tumbles chaotically in space. Hyperion’s orbit is locked with Titan’s.

“Hyperion, the smallest among Saturn’s major moons provided us the most important clue about the history of the system,” said Ćuk. “In simulations where the extra moon became unstable, Hyperion was often lost and survived only in rare cases. We recognized that the Titan-Hyperion lock is relatively young, only a few hundred million years old. This dates to about the same period when the extra moon disappeared. Perhaps Hyperion did not survive this upheaval but resulted from it. If the extra moon merged with Titan, it would likely produce fragments near Titan’s orbit. That is exactly where Hyperion would have formed.”

In other words, Hyperion may not have simply survived past chaos. It may have formed from debris created when Titan merged with another moon.

A Collision Between Proto Moons

The new model proposes that Titan formed when two earlier moons combined. One was a large body called “Proto-Titan,” nearly as massive as Titan today. The other was a smaller companion referred to as “Proto-Hyperion.”

Such a merger could explain why Titan has relatively few impact craters. A massive collision would have resurfaced the moon, erasing much of its earlier crater record. Titan’s current orbit, which is slightly elongated but gradually becoming more circular, also hints at a relatively recent disturbance consistent with a past merger.

Before the collision, Proto-Titan may have resembled Jupiter’s moon Callisto, heavily cratered and lacking an atmosphere. The team also found that before it disappeared, Proto-Hyperion could have tilted the orbit of Saturn’s distant moon Iapetus, potentially solving another longstanding mystery about the Saturn system.

How Titan’s Merger May Have Created Saturn’s Rings

If Titan formed from a moon merger, the question remains: where did Saturn’s rings come from?

More than a decade ago, members of the SETI Institute team suggested that the rings formed from debris created when medium sized moons closer to Saturn collided. Later simulations by researchers at the University of Edinburgh and NASA Ames Research Center supported this idea. Those studies showed that most of the debris from such impacts would eventually clump back together into moons, but some material would be scattered inward and remain as rings.

Previously, scientists believed the Sun may have triggered the instability that caused those inner moon collisions. The new research suggests a different chain of events. Titan’s merger may have set off the process.

Titan’s slightly elongated orbit can disturb inner moons when their orbital periods become simple fractions of Titan’s. This configuration, known as orbital resonance, strengthens gravitational interactions. Although such alignments are unlikely at any given moment, Titan’s outward migration sometimes creates these resonances.

When that happens, smaller moons can be pushed into more stretched out orbits, increasing the chances that they collide with neighboring moons. The timing of this second round of destruction is uncertain, but it must have occurred after Titan’s merger. That sequence fits with estimates that Saturn’s rings are about 100 million years old.

Dragonfly Mission Could Test the Theory

NASA’s Dragonfly mission, scheduled to arrive at Titan in 2034, could provide crucial evidence. The nuclear powered octocopter will study Titan’s surface geology and chemistry in detail. If Dragonfly finds signs of large scale resurfacing or other clues tied to a massive collision about half a billion years ago, it would support the idea that Titan was shaped by a dramatic moon merger.

The study has been accepted for publication in the Planetary Science Journal, and the preprint is available on arXiv.

Share Button

Parents of gravely ill child refused respite care

Birmingham Children’s Trust refused respite help and suggested training grandparents to help.

Share Button