Scientists sound the alarm as dangerous amoebas spread globally

Environmental and public health researchers are warning that a little-known group of microbes could become a much bigger threat to human health. These organisms, known as free living amoebae, are found in water and soil, but scientists say some species are becoming increasingly concerning as the world warms and water systems age.

In a perspective published in the scientific journal Biocontaminant, researchers describe free living amoebae as an overlooked public health risk that needs far more attention. They point to climate change, aging water infrastructure, and weak monitoring systems as factors that could allow dangerous amoebae to spread and become harder to control.

Why Some Amoebae Are Dangerous

Amoebae are single celled organisms that commonly live in natural environments such as lakes, rivers, soil, and water systems. Most do not harm humans, but a small number can cause severe disease.

One of the best-known examples is Naegleria fowleri, sometimes called the brain eating amoeba. This organism can cause a rare but extremely deadly brain infection when contaminated water enters the nose, often during swimming or other recreational water activities.

“What makes these organisms particularly dangerous is their ability to survive conditions that kill many other microbes,” said corresponding author Longfei Shu of Sun Yat sen University. “They can tolerate high temperatures, strong disinfectants like chlorine, and even live inside water distribution systems that people assume are safe.”

A Hidden Shelter for Other Pathogens

The danger does not come only from the amoebae themselves. The researchers also warn that amoebae can act as living shelters for other harmful microbes.

Bacteria and viruses can hide inside amoebae, where they may be shielded from disinfectants and other treatment methods. This allows some pathogens to persist longer in drinking water systems and potentially spread more effectively. Scientists refer to this as a Trojan horse effect, and the researchers say it may also play a role in the spread of antibiotic resistance.

Climate Change Could Expand the Risk

Rising global temperatures could make the problem worse. Heat loving amoebae may be able to survive and spread in regions where they were once uncommon, increasing the chance of human exposure.

Recent outbreaks connected to recreational water have already raised concern in several countries. As warm conditions become more widespread, scientists say water managers and health officials may need to prepare for risks that were once considered rare or limited to certain areas.

Researchers Call for Stronger Water Safety Measures

The authors are calling for a coordinated One Health strategy that brings together human health, environmental science, and water management. They say better surveillance, faster diagnostic tools, and more advanced water treatment technologies are needed to reduce the risk before infections happen.

“Amoebae are not just a medical issue or an environmental issue,” Shu said. “They sit at the intersection of both, and addressing them requires integrated solutions that protect public health at its source.”

Share Button

This Is The Exact Amount Of Lifting Needed For A Longer Life

Strength training has so many benefits, it’s hard to keep count. It’s been linked to up to four years of extra life, can help to protect us from falls as we age, may reduce dementia risk, and could maintain your bone health… the list goes on.

A new paper published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine has added clarifying details for those hoping to see the most benefits from the activity.

After 30 years of follow-up from 147,374 participants, they found the optimum amount of lifting and resistance training per week for longevity.

How much strength training should I do per week?

This research found that the lowest risk of all-cause mortality was linked to one to two hours (60-119 minutes) of resistance training, especially if it was done alongside aerobic training.

The benefits of strength training seemed to “plateau” at two hours a week in this study, meanwhile.

Speaking to HuffPost UK previously, Dr Suzanne Wylie, GP and medical adviser for IQdoctor, said: “I would generally advise at least two sessions of strength training per week, focusing on all the major muscle groups”.

How much of a difference does one to two hours a week of strength training make?

In this study:

  • 60-120 minutes of strength training a week was linked to 13% lower all-cause mortality risk,
  • The risk of death from cardiovascular disease, like heart attack or stroke, was 19% lower,
  • The risk of death from dementia was 27% lower,
  • The risk of all-cause mortality was 58% lower when 90-120 minutes of strength training was combined with a high level of aerobic activity (30-45 hours a week).

What counts as resistance or strength training?

You don’t always need weights to do strength training.

Dr Wylie formerly told us that strength training “might include bodyweight exercises like squats, push-ups, or step-ups, or using resistance bands or weights at home or in the gym”.

The point is that your muscles work against a form of resistance, be that a dumbbell or your own weight.

She added, “The emphasis should be on steady, safe progression rather than attempting heavy lifts immediately”.

Share Button

A tiny atomic shift gives scientists powerful control over metals

Researchers at the University of Minnesota Twin Cities have demonstrated an unexpected new way to change how a metal behaves electronically. By carefully engineering the atomic interactions where two materials come into contact, the team was able to significantly alter the properties of a metallic material.

The findings, published in Nature Communications, show that a phenomenon known as interfacial polarization can be used to adjust the surface work function of metallic ruthenium dioxide (RuO2) by more than 1 electron volt (eV). The effect was achieved simply by changing the thickness of an ultra-thin film by a few nanometers.

Atomic-Scale Control of Metal Properties

Polarization is typically associated with insulating materials and ferroelectrics rather than metals. However, the researchers found a way to stabilize polarization within a metallic system and use it to influence electronic behavior.

“We often think of polarization as something that belongs to insulators or ferroelectrics — not metals,” said Bharat Jalan, professor and Shell Chair in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at the University of Minnesota. “Our work shows that, through careful interface design, you can stabilize polarization in a metallic system and use it as a knob to tune electronic properties. This opens an entirely new way of thinking about controlling metals.”

The team discovered that the effect depends strongly on the thickness of the metal layer. The most dramatic changes occurred when the ruthenium dioxide film reached approximately 4 nanometers thick, which is about the width of a single DNA strand.

A Critical Transition at 4 Nanometers

At this thickness, the metal undergoes a transition from a strained state caused by the underlying material to a more relaxed atomic arrangement. The results provide direct evidence that the way atoms are organized inside a material can have a measurable influence on its electronic characteristics.

“This was surprising,” said Seung Gyo Jeong, first author of the study and a researcher in Jalan’s group. “We expected subtle interface effects, but not such a large and controllable change in work function. Being able to visualize the polar displacements at the atomic scale and connect them directly to electronic measurements was especially exciting.”

By observing tiny atomic movements and linking them to large electronic changes, the researchers were able to show how interface engineering can be used as a powerful tool for controlling metals.

Potential Applications in Electronics and Quantum Technology

In addition to advancing scientists’ understanding of fundamental physics, the discovery could help guide the development of future electronic devices, catalytic systems, and quantum technologies.

The research involved collaborators from the University of Minnesota Twin Cities, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Texas A&M University, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, and the School of Physics at the University of Minnesota Twin Cities.

Funding for the work was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research.

Share Button

Are you feeling overwhelmed?

Kimberley Wilson gives some tips on how to deal with feeling overwhelmed.

Share Button

Ronan Keating on the toll of being in Boyzone

Ronan Keating talks about the mental toll of being in Boyzone.

Share Button

Scientists discover why ozempic may not work for some people

More than one-quarter of people with Type 2 diabetes now use GLP-1 receptor agonists, a class of medications that includes Ozempic. But new research from Stanford Medicine and international collaborators suggests these widely prescribed drugs may be less effective for some patients because of their genetics.

The study found that about 10% of people carry genetic variants linked to a phenomenon known as GLP-1 resistance. Individuals with these variants appear to produce higher levels of the hormone GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1), which helps regulate blood sugar, yet the hormone does not seem to work as effectively in their bodies.

Researchers focused on blood sugar control and did not reach firm conclusions about weight loss effects. Drugs such as Ozempic and Wegovy are typically prescribed at higher doses for obesity treatment than for diabetes management, and more research is needed to determine whether the same genetic factors influence weight loss outcomes.

Published in Genome Medicine, the study brought together scientists from multiple countries over a period of 10 years. The work included experiments in both humans and mice, along with analyses of data from clinical trials involving diabetes medications.

“In some of the trials, we saw that individuals who had those variants were unable to lower their blood glucose levels as effectively after six months of treatment,” said Anna Gloyn, DPhil, professor of pediatrics and of genetics at Stanford Medicine and one of the study’s senior authors. At that stage, physicians would often consider changing a patient’s treatment plan. Identifying likely responders in advance could help patients reach the most effective therapy sooner and move diabetes care closer to precision medicine, she said.

The study’s other senior author is Markus Stoffel, MD, PhD, professor of metabolic diseases at the Institute of Molecular Health Sciences at ETH Zurich in Switzerland. Lead authors include Mahesh Umapathysivam, MBBS, DPhil, an endocrinologist and clinical researcher at Adelaide University in Australia and a former trainee with Gloyn, and Elisa Araldi, PhD, associate professor of medicine and surgery at the University of Parma in Italy and a former trainee with Stoffel.

“When I treat patients in the diabetes clinic, I see a huge variation in response to these GLP-1-based medications and it is difficult to predict this response clinically,” Umapathysivam said. “This is the first step in being able to use someone’s genetic make-up to help us improve that decision-making process.”

Scientists Investigate a Diabetes Drug Mystery

This research represents the first detailed examination of GLP-1 resistance, but scientists still do not know exactly what causes it.

“That is the million-dollar question,” Gloyn said. “We have ticked off this enormous list of all the ways in which we thought GLP-1 resistance might come about. No matter what we’ve done, we’ve not been able to nail precisely why they are resistant.”

The team concentrated on two genetic variants that reduce the activity of an enzyme called PAM (peptidyl-glycine alpha-amidating monooxygenase). This enzyme plays a unique role in the body because it activates a variety of hormones, including GLP-1.

“PAM is a truly fascinating enzyme because it’s the only enzyme we have that’s capable of a chemical process called amidation, which increases the half-life or the potency of biologically active peptides,” Gloyn said.

“We thought, if you have a problem with this enzyme, there’s going to be multiple aspects of your biology that are not working properly.”

Previous research had already shown that PAM variants occur more often in people with diabetes. Gloyn had also demonstrated that these variants impair the pancreas’s ability to release insulin. Researchers wanted to determine whether the same genetic changes also affected GLP-1, a hormone released from the gut that helps control blood sugar after eating by stimulating insulin production, slowing stomach emptying, and reducing appetite. GLP-1 receptor agonists work by mimicking this hormone.

An Unexpected Discovery About GLP-1 Levels

To investigate, researchers recruited adults with and without a PAM variant known as p.S539W. Participants drank a sugary solution, and blood samples were collected every five minutes over a four-hour period. The study involved people without diabetes to reduce the influence of other factors that could affect the results.

Scientists initially expected participants with the PAM variant to have lower levels of GLP-1 because the hormone might be less stable without proper amidation.

“What we actually saw was they had increased levels of GLP-1,” Gloyn said. “This was the opposite of what we imagined we would find.”

“Despite people with the PAM variant having higher circulating levels of GLP-1, we saw no evidence of higher biological activity. They were not reducing their blood sugar levels more quickly. More GLP-1 was needed to have the same biological effect, meaning they were resistant to GLP-1.”

Mouse Studies Confirm GLP-1 Resistance

The findings were so unexpected that the researchers spent several years testing whether the result was real.

“We couldn’t understand this, which is why we looked as many different ways as we could to see if this was a really robust observation,” Gloyn said.

To verify the findings, the team partnered with scientists in Zurich who had developed mice lacking the PAM gene. These animals displayed similar signs of GLP-1 resistance. They had elevated GLP-1 levels, yet the hormone was less effective at controlling blood sugar.

One of GLP-1’s major functions is slowing gastric emptying, which is the rate at which food leaves the stomach. This effect contributes to both blood sugar regulation and weight loss. Mice without the PAM gene showed faster gastric emptying, and treatment with a GLP-1 receptor agonist failed to slow the process.

Researchers also detected weaker responses to GLP-1 in both the pancreas and digestive tract of these mice. However, levels of GLP-1 receptors themselves remained unchanged.

Working with scientists in Copenhagen, the researchers further demonstrated that PAM defects do not interfere with GLP-1 binding to its receptor or with signaling at the receptor level. These findings suggest the source of GLP-1 resistance likely occurs farther downstream in the biological pathway.

Genetic Variants Affect Diabetes Drug Response

The team next examined whether GLP-1 resistance influenced real-world treatment outcomes.

Using data from three clinical trials that included 1,119 participants with diabetes, researchers found that people carrying PAM variants generally responded less well to GLP-1 receptor agonists. Their HbA1c levels, a measure of long-term blood sugar control, improved less than those of non-carriers.

After six months of treatment, approximately 25% of participants without the variants reached recommended HbA1c targets. Among carriers of the p.S539W variant, only 11.5% achieved those goals. For carriers of the p.D563G variant, the figure was 18.5%.

Importantly, the genetic variants did not appear to affect responses to several other common diabetes medications, including sulfonylureas, metformin, and DPP-4i drugs.

“What was really striking was that we saw no effect from whether you have a variant on your response to other types of diabetes medications,” Gloyn said. “We can see very clearly that this is specific to medications that are working through GLP-1 receptor pharmacology.”

Two additional pharmaceutical company-sponsored trials produced different results, with carriers and non-carriers responding similarly. Those studies involved longer-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists, which may be better able to overcome GLP-1 resistance, according to Gloyn.

Questions Remain About Weight Loss and Future Treatments

The research team first detected signs of GLP-1 resistance nearly a decade ago, long before GLP-1 drugs became widely known for weight loss.

Only two of the clinical trials included weight loss data. Those results showed no differences between people with and without PAM variants, but the available evidence was too limited to draw firm conclusions.

Gloyn noted that large amounts of genetic data from clinical trials likely already exist and could help answer important questions about why some people respond poorly to GLP-1 therapies.

“It’s very common for pharmaceutical companies to collect genetic data on their participants,” she said. “For the newer GLP-1 medications, it would be useful to look at whether there are genetic variants, like the variants in PAM, that explain poor responders to their medications.”

Although the biological mechanism remains unclear, Gloyn believes the answer is likely complex and influenced by multiple factors. She compares the situation to insulin resistance, which researchers still do not completely understand despite decades of study.

Even so, treatments have been developed to help overcome insulin resistance, raising the possibility that similar approaches could eventually be created for GLP-1 resistance.

“There are a whole class of medications that are insulin sensitizers, so perhaps we can develop medications that will allow people to be sensitized to GLP-1s or find formulations of GLP-1, like the longer-acting versions, that avoid the GLP-1 resistance.” she said.

Researchers from the University of Oxford, University of Dundee, University of Copenhagen, University of British Columbia, Churchill Hospital, Newcastle University, University of Bath, and University of Exeter also contributed to the study.

Funding was provided by Wellcome, the Medical Research Council, the European Union Horizon 2020 Program, the National Institutes of Health (grants U01-DK105535, U01-DK085545 and UM-1DK126185), the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Novo Nordisk Foundation, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Diabetes Australia.

Share Button

Hidden supermassive black hole pairs may finally have a visible signal

Astronomers from the University of Oxford and the Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Albert Einstein Institute) have outlined a new strategy for uncovering one of the universe’s most elusive objects: tightly bound pairs of supermassive black holes.

These giant black hole duos are expected to form naturally after galaxies merge. Although astronomers have identified some widely separated supermassive black hole pairs, finding those that orbit much closer together has proven far more difficult.

In a study published in Physical Review Letters, the researchers suggest searching for a distinctive signal. As the black holes orbit each other, their immense gravity could repeatedly magnify the light from stars located behind them, creating recurring flashes that may reveal the hidden systems.

Galaxy Mergers Create Supermassive Black Hole Binaries

Most galaxies contain a supermassive black hole at their center. When galaxies collide and eventually combine, their central black holes can become gravitationally bound, forming what scientists call a supermassive black hole binary.

These systems are important for understanding how galaxies evolve over time. They are also expected to generate some of the strongest gravitational waves in the universe.

Future space-based gravitational wave observatories should be able to detect these binaries directly. However, the new research suggests that astronomers may not have to wait. Existing and upcoming sky surveys could potentially identify them through their effects on visible light.

“Supermassive black holes act as natural telescopes,” said Dr. Miguel Zumalacárregui from the Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics. “Because of their enormous mass and compact size, they strongly bend passing light. Starlight from the same host galaxy can be focused into extraordinarily bright images, a phenomenon known as gravitational lensing.”

How Gravitational Lensing Creates Bright Flashes

A single supermassive black hole can dramatically magnify a background star, but only when the alignment is almost perfect.

A binary system behaves differently. With two black holes acting as gravitational lenses, the region where extreme magnification can occur becomes much larger. The pair creates a diamond-shaped feature known as a caustic curve, where stars can appear dramatically brighter.

In theory, a perfectly point-like star could be magnified infinitely. In reality, the finite size of stars places a limit on how bright the effect can become.

“The chances of starlight being hugely amplified increase enormously for a binary compared to a single black hole,” said Professor Bence Kocsis from the University of Oxford’s Department of Physics and a co-author of the study.

Repeating Stellar Flashes Could Reveal Hidden Black Holes

Unlike a single black hole, a black hole binary is constantly changing.

As the two black holes orbit each other, they gradually lose energy through the emission of gravitational waves, a process predicted by Einstein’s theory of general relativity. Over time, this causes the black holes to move closer together and orbit faster.

Graduate student Hanxi Wang is in Professor Kocsis’ group and led the study: “As the binary moves, the caustic curve rotates and changes shape, sweeping across a large volume of stars behind it. If a bright star lies within this region, it can produce an extraordinarily bright flash each time the caustic passes over it. This leads to repeating bursts of starlight, which provide a clear and distinctive signature of a supermassive black hole binary.”

Because the caustic structure continually shifts, the resulting flashes would occur again and again, creating a recognizable pattern that astronomers could search for.

Clues About Black Hole Masses and Orbits

The team found that the timing and intensity of these flashes should follow predictable trends rather than appearing randomly.

As gravitational waves slowly shrink the orbit, they subtly alter the shape and motion of the caustic curve. Those changes leave measurable signatures in both the brightness and frequency of the flashes.

By analyzing these patterns, researchers could estimate important characteristics of the hidden binary, including the masses of the black holes and details of their orbital evolution.

Powerful new observatories, including the Vera C. Rubin Observatory and the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, are expected to dramatically expand the search for these repeating lensing events in the coming years.

“The prospect of identifying inspiraling supermassive black hole binaries years before future space-based gravitational wave detectors come online is extremely exciting,” concludes Professor Kocsis. “It opens the door to true multi-messenger studies of black holes, allowing us to test gravity and black hole physics in entirely new ways.”

Share Button

Loneliness group helps young adults find friends

The national group was set up to help tackle loneliness, after a man died from suicide.

Share Button

1 in 4 births in England now by emergency C-section

A quarter of all babies in England are now delivered by emergency caesarean operations, BBC analysis shows – marking a significant rise over the last five years.

Share Button

Giant fire tornadoes could clean up oil spills faster with less pollution

When a major oil spill occurs at sea, emergency crews often face a difficult choice. They can allow the oil to spread across the water, threatening coastlines and marine life, or they can set it on fire.

Burning the oil, a technique known as an in situ burn, can prevent the slick from expanding. However, it also produces thick clouds of black smoke, releases soot into the atmosphere, and leaves behind a layer of unburned residue floating on the ocean’s surface.

Now, researchers have demonstrated a striking new approach that could make this process far more effective. In a first-of-its-kind large-scale study, scientists created giant fire whirls, spinning columns of flame that resemble fire tornadoes, and found they burn oil faster and more cleanly than conventional methods.

The rotating vortex draws in large amounts of oxygen, creating a hotter and more efficient flame. As a result, the fire whirl consumed oil more rapidly while producing significantly less pollution.

The study, supported by the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE), was led by Dr. Elaine Oran and Dr. Qingsheng Wang of Texas A&M University and Dr. Michael Gollner of the University of California, Berkeley.

“This the first time anyone has conceived using fire whirls for oil spill remediation, and it’s really just the beginning,” said Oran, professor of aerospace engineering in the College of Engineering. “Our goal is to harness the chaotic nature of fire whirls as a powerful, precise restoration tool, to protect coastlines, marine ecosystems and the environment as a whole.”

A Faster, Cleaner Way to Fight Oil Spills

The research introduces an unconventional strategy for dealing with one of the most damaging environmental emergencies.

The devastating Deepwater Horizon disaster in 2010 remains a powerful reminder of the impact offshore oil spills can have. The accident, the largest offshore oil spill in U.S. history, killed 11 workers, claimed the lives of thousands of marine animals, and caused widespread damage to ocean ecosystems.

“We are looking at environmental disasters like oil spills, and identifying ways to remediate them in faster, greener and more sustainable ways,” Oran said.

One of the most promising advantages of fire whirls is speed.

According to the researchers, fire whirls can burn crude oil nearly twice as fast as traditional in situ fire pools. Faster removal of oil could give response teams a critical advantage, allowing them to eliminate spills before they spread into sensitive habitats and protected coastal regions.

“Fire whirls burn through crude oil spills nearly twice as fast as in-situ fire pools, potentially giving cleanup crews faster operational and response times to eliminating the oils from spreading,” Oran said.

The technique could also reduce one of the biggest drawbacks of burning oil: smoke.

“One of the biggest challenges of burning oil spills is the sheer volume of smoke emitted,” Oran said. “Our results show that fire whirls, compared to in-situ fires, dramatically reduce overall emissions.”

Acting like a giant incinerator, the spinning flames destroy many of the particles responsible for dense smoke plumes. The process also vaporizes most of the oil before it can remain behind as a toxic tar-like residue on the water.

The findings may have applications beyond oil spill response. A better understanding of how fire whirls form and behave could help engineers develop more efficient combustion systems and improve efforts to predict and manage wildfires.

“Our study has universal applications,” Oran said. “By understanding the physical laws that govern fire whirls, we can harness their power beyond oil spill remediation.”

Building a 17-Foot-Tall Fire Whirl

Most previous studies of fire whirls have been conducted on a much smaller scale in laboratory settings.

To explore whether the phenomenon could be useful for real-world oil spill cleanup, the research team designed an experiment large enough to mimic more realistic conditions.

“The scale of our experiment is one of the reasons why our investigation is so unique, and what sets it apart as a first-of-its-kind,” Oran said.

The researchers built a 16-foot-tall triangular structure with three walls that allowed them to carefully control airflow. At the center, they placed a 1.5-meter-wide pool of crude oil floating on water.

Once ignited at the Texas A&M Engineering Extension Service (TEEX) Brayton Fire Training Field, the setup generated a powerful fire whirl that reached nearly 17 feet in height.

The results, published in Fuel, showed major improvements over conventional oil burning techniques.

“The fire whirls burned the oil about 40 percent faster, cut soot emissions by 40 percent, and achieved up to 95 percent fuel consumption efficiency compared to in-situ fire tests,” Oran said.

Finding the Fire Whirl “Goldilocks” Zone

Despite their impressive performance, fire whirls are not easy to control.

“Fire whirls are incredibly powerful, and can be incredibly beneficial,” Oran said. “But they’re also sensitive and only reach high efficiency when the conditions are just right.”

Strong winds can destabilize the spinning column or cause it to collapse altogether. Insufficient airflow control can prevent the vortex from forming, causing the fire to behave more like a conventional burn.

Researchers also discovered that the thickness of the oil layer plays an important role. When the slick became too deep, the fire whirls went out before consuming all of the fuel.

This narrow range of ideal conditions, described by the researchers as a “Goldilocks” zone, highlights both the promise and the challenge of bringing the technology into practical use.

Fire Tornadoes as Future Cleanup Tools

The team envisions a future in which portable systems could be deployed directly over burning oil spills to intentionally generate fire whirls on demand.

If successful, such systems could transform emergency oil spill response by converting ordinary fires into highly efficient cleanup tools.

“This study is more than just an experiment, it’s a glimpse into a future where fire isn’t a force of destruction, but a tool to protect our oceans and planet,” Oran said.

For now, the research stands as an impressive demonstration of what can happen when scientists rethink a familiar natural phenomenon.

It suggests that even one of nature’s most intimidating forces can potentially be redirected to address some of the world’s most urgent environmental challenges.

Share Button