Health24.com | Baby’s meningitis case highlights growing danger of antibiotic resistance

  • There is increasing concern about antibiotic resistance in meningitis infections
  • In the US, a five-month-old baby with meningitis recently proved to be resistant to standard antibiotic treatment
  • Researchers say this calls for closer partnerships between infectious disease doctors and microbiology labs

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria affected the treatment of meningitis at a major children’s hospital in Washington, D.C.

This single case at Children’s National Hospital raises concerns about drug resistance in the common bacterium that caused the infection, and researchers say it could change lab and clinical procedures around the world.

Normally, when doctors first suspect meningitis in children, they usually give the broad-spectrum antibiotic ceftriaxone, which acts against a wider range of disease-causing bacteria. When the meningitis organism is identified through lab tests, penicillin or ampicillin are used, the researchers explained.

People who have had close contact with the patients are also given ciprofloxacin as a precaution.

Inappropriate treatment

In this case, a five-month-old baby was taken to the emergency room after six days of fever and congestion. The infant’s particular meningitis contained an enzyme that makes the germ resistant to penicillin and ampicillin, and also to ciprofloxacin.

The hospital sent samples of the resistant bacteria to several health agencies, including the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, to compare with other samples.

“These bacteria wouldn’t have been susceptible to the common antibiotics that we would normally use for this infection, so it’s entirely possible that the infections caused by these bacteria could have been treated inappropriately if doctors used the standard protocol,” co-author Dr Gillian Taormina said in a hospital news release. She is a fellow in paediatric infectious diseases.

Taormina said the baby’s condition improved after seven days on ceftriaxone. Relatives and other contacts were treated with the antibiotic rifampin.

Close partnerships

Although this case had a good outcome, it underscores increasing concern about antibiotic resistance in other meningitis infections.

Taormina and co-author Joseph Campos said the growing number of antibiotic-resistant bacteria calls for close partnerships between infectious disease doctors and microbiology labs. Campos is director of the hospital’s Infectious Diseases Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory.

Image credit: iStock

NEXT ON HEALTH24X

Share Button

South Korea tightens Covid-19 curbs amid warning of new ‘crisis’

South Korea’s capital sees its highest number of cases since March, many linked to a church outbreak.

Share Button

A new way to enjoy fresh fruit

Mayo Clinic does not endorse companies or products. Advertising revenue supports our not-for-profit mission.

Advertising & Sponsorship

Mayo Clinic Marketplace

Check out these best-sellers and special offers on books and newsletters from Mayo Clinic.

Share Button

Coronavirus smell loss ‘different from cold and flu’

Covid-19 is not like other typical viral respiratory diseases and has some unique features, say experts.

Share Button

Insect wings inspire new ways to fight superbugs

Scientists have revealed how nanomaterials inspired by insect wings are able to destroy bacteria on contact.

The wings of cicadas and dragonflies are natural bacteria killers, a phenomenon that has spurred researchers searching for ways to defeat drug-resistant superbugs.

New anti-bacterial surfaces are being developed, featuring different nanopatterns that mimic the deadly action of insect wings, but scientists are only beginning to unravel the mysteries of how they work.

In a review published in Nature Reviews Microbiology, researchers have detailed exactly how these patterns destroy bacteria — stretching, slicing or tearing them apart.

Lead author, RMIT University’s Distinguished Professor Elena Ivanova, said finding non-chemical ways of killing bacteria was critical, with more than 700,000 people dying each year due to drug-resistant bacterial infection.

“Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is one of the greatest threats to global health and routine treatment of infection is becoming increasingly difficult,” Ivanova said.

“When we look to nature for ideas, we find insects have evolved highly effective anti-bacterial systems.

“If we can understand exactly how insect-inspired nanopatterns kill bacteria, we can be more precise in engineering these shapes to improve their effectiveness against infections.

“Our ultimate goal is to develop low-cost and scaleable anti-bacterial surfaces for use in implants and in hospitals, to deliver powerful new weapons in the fight against deadly superbugs.”

Bacteria-killing surfaces

The wings of cicadas and dragonflies are covered in tiny nanopillars, which were the first nanopatterns developed by scientists aiming to imitate their bactericidal effects.

Since then, they’ve also precisely engineered other nanoshapes like sheets and wires, all designed to physically damage bacteria cells.

Bacteria that land on these nanostructures find themselves pulled, stretched or sliced apart, rupturing the bacterial cell membrane and eventually killing them.

The new review for the first time categorises the different ways these surface nanopatterns deliver the necessary mechanical forces to burst the cell membrane.

“Our synthetic biomimetic nanostructures vary substantially in their anti-bacterial performance and it’s not always clear why,” Ivanova said.

“We have also struggled to work out the optimal shape and dimensions of a particular nanopattern, to maximise its lethal power.

“While the synthetic surfaces we’ve been developing take nature to the next level, even looking at dragonflies, for example, we see that different species have wings that are better at killing some bacteria than others.

“When we examine the wings at the nanoscale, we see differences in the density, height and diameter of the nanopillars that cover the surfaces of these wings, so we know that getting the nanostructures right is key.”

Ivanova said producing nanostructured surfaces in large volumes cost-effectively, so they could be used in medical or industrial applications, remained a challenge.

But recent advancements in nanofabrication technologies have shown promise for opening a new era of biomedical antimicrobial nanotechnology, she said.

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyIrF5Jbrs8&feature=emb_logo

Story Source:

Materials provided by RMIT University. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Share Button

Flexible and protected

In the fight against the coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 researchers from multiple research institutions in Germany have combined their resources to study the spike protein on the surface of the virus. With its spikes, the virus binds to human cells and infects them. The study gave surprising insights into the spike protein, including an unexpected freedom of movement and a protective coat to hide it from antibodies. The results are published in Science.

At the start of a COVID-19 infection, the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 docks onto human cells using the spike-like proteins on its surface. The spike protein is at the centre of vaccine development because it triggers an immune response in humans. A group of German scientists, including members of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) in Heidelberg, the Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, and Goethe University Frankfurt have focused on the surface structure of the virus to gain insights they can use for the development of vaccines and of effective therapeutics to treat infected patients.

The team combined cryo-electron tomography, subtomogram averaging, and molecular dynamics simulations to analyse the molecular structure of the spike protein in its natural environment, on intact virions, and with near-atomic resolution. Using EMBL’s state-of-the-art cryo-electron microscopy imaging facility, 266 cryotomograms of about 1000 different viruses were generated, each carrying an average of 40 spikes on its surface. Subtomogram averaging and image processing, combined with molecular dynamics simulations, finally provided the important and novel structural information on these spikes.

The results were surprising: the data showed that the globular portion of the spike protein, which contains the receptor-binding region and the machinery required for fusion with the target cell, is connected to a flexible stalk. “The upper spherical part of the spike has a structure that is well reproduced by recombinant proteins used for vaccine development,” explains Martin Beck, EMBL group leader and a director of the Max Planck Institute (MPI) of Biophysics. “However, our findings about the stalk, which fixes the globular part of the spike protein to the virus surface, were new.”

“The stalk was expected to be quite rigid,” adds Gerhard Hummer, from the MPI of Biophysics and the Institute of Biophysics at Goethe University Frankfurt. “But in our computer models and in the actual images, we discovered that the stalks are extremely flexible.” By combining molecular dynamics simulations and cryo-electron tomography, the team identified the three joints — hip, knee and ankle — that give the stalk its flexibility.

“Like a balloon on a string, the spikes appear to move on the surface of the virus and thus are able to search for the receptor for docking to the target cell,” explains Jacomine Krijnse Locker, group leader at the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut. To prevent infection, these spikes are targeted by antibodies. However, the images and models also showed that the entire spike protein, including the stalk, is covered with chains of glycans — sugar-like molecules. These chains provide a kind of protective coat that hides the spikes from neutralising antibodies: another important finding on the way to effective vaccines and medicines.

Story Source:

Materials provided by European Molecular Biology Laboratory. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Share Button

Recent global warming trends are inconsistent with very high climate sensitivity

Research published this week in Earth System Dynamics reports that the most sensitive climate models overestimate global warming during the last 50 years.

Three scientists from the University of Exeter studied the output of complex climate models and compared them to temperature observations since the 1970s.

Recent developments in cloud modelling have produced models that portray very large sensitivity to rising greenhouse gas concentrations.

A subset of models even showed that a doubling of CO2 could lead to over 5°C of warming, questioning whether the goals of the Paris agreement are achievable even if nations do everything they can.

The lead author of the study, PhD candidate Femke Nijsse from the University of Exeter, said: “In evaluating the climate models we were able to exploit the fact that thanks to clean air regulation, air pollution in the form of climate-cooling aerosols have stopped increasing worldwide, allowing the greenhouse gas signal to dominate recent warming.”

The amount of warming that occurs after CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere are doubled is called the equilibrium climate sensitivity.

The study found that based on the latest generation of climate models the equilibrium climate sensitivity is likely between 1.9 and 3.4 °C.

Co-author Mark Williamson, of Exeter’s Global Systems Institute, added: “Global warming since 1970 also provides even better guidance on the rate of climate change in the future.

“We find a likely range for the ‘Transient Climate Response’ of 1.3-2.1°C, whether we use the latest models or the previous generation of models.”

The new study is only one piece of the puzzle.

A recent review paper found that low estimates of climate sensitivity can be excluded because they are, in general, not consistent with climate changes in Earth’s past.

Co-author Professor Peter Cox explains the significance of these findings: “It is good to see that studies are now converging on a range of equilibrium climate sensitivity, and that both high and low values can be excluded.

“For over forty years, climate scientists have tried to pinpoint this quantity and it seems that we’re finally getting close.”

The research was supported by the European Research Council (‘ECCLES’ project).

Story Source:

Materials provided by University of Exeter. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Share Button

Health24.com | Have diabetes? Don’t lose sight of danger to your eyes

  • A third of diabetes have complications related to their eyes 
  • This can, however, be prevented
  • This can be done by focusing on good blood sugar management and regular eye exams

Diabetes can wreak havoc on many parts of the body, including the eyes, but people with diabetes aren’t doomed to have vision problems.

With good blood sugar management and regular eye exams, many eye conditions can be prevented or treated, experts say.

Patricia Welter, a Pilates studio owner from Palm Harbor, Florida, wishes she’d known more about preventing eye problems related to diabetes before it was too late. She was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at 14, and lost one of her eyes because of diabetes when she was in her 40s.

Blurry vision

“I was always scared to death of eye complications and blindness from diabetes,” Welter said. Her uncle and her mother both had type 1 diabetes and had vision issues from the disease. But Welter was diagnosed in the 1970s before a lot of advances had been made in treating diabetes and diabetic eye disease.

“Looking back, I saw signs. I started getting blurry vision and would see little dots. If I had been diagnosed and treated earlier for my eye disease, maybe I wouldn’t have lost my eye,” she said.

When she was in her 40s, Welter started experiencing bleeding in her retina (the part of the eye that senses light and sends visual messages to the brain). She saw an eye doctor and had laser surgery performed in both eyes. Then one day she saw flashes in her left eye. The doctors diagnosed a retinal detachment. She had three surgeries to try to save the eye, but had a stroke during the third surgery and lost her left eye.

“I really felt sorry for myself the first few months,” she said. But her boyfriend (now her husband) pushed her to get active again, to return to Pilates. He also challenged her to complete a half marathon, which they did together.

Welter said she hasn’t let the loss of her eye stop her in any way. “It’s part of my being now,” she added.

‘Get a team of people’

In addition to having diabetic retinopathy, she also developed an early cataract – another concern for people with diabetes. Cataracts cause cloudy lenses in the eyes. Welter had surgery to correct the cataract and said it changed her world because it gave her so much of her vision back in her remaining eye.

Her advice to others with diabetes is, “Get a team of people around you to help manage your diabetes – family, friends, co-workers, endocrinologist, diabetes educator, registered dietician and an eye doctor. If you catch eye problems early, you can treat it.”

Tracey Brown, CEO of the American Diabetes Association (ADA), also stresses the need for early care.

“One-third of people with diabetes have complications related to their eyes, and eye care doesn’t get nearly the attention it should,” Brown said. “Eye care needs to be a priority, even during this stressful time, because if you can do the things that are required, you don’t necessarily have to have the eye problems of diabetes.”

Brown recently led an expert panel for the ADA’s Focus on Diabetes: Look Closer at Eye Health initiative, including experts from the ADA, VSP Vision Care and Regeneron.

There are four types of eye disease that are more common in people with diabetes, according to the US National Eye Institute (NEI):

  • Diabetic retinopathy
  • Diabetic macular oedema
  • Glaucoma
  • Cataracts

These conditions are more common in people who have higher blood sugar levels, so managing your diabetes well can help prevent eye disease, the NEI said.

There are a number of symptoms of eye disease that should prompt a visit to an eye doctor. These include:

  • Blurred or wavy vision
  • Vision that changes frequently, possibly from day to day
  • Areas with no vision
  • Dark areas in your vision
  • Difficulty seeing colours
  • Seeing spots or dark strings (floaters)
  • Light flashes

But even if you don’t have symptoms of eye disease, it’s important to have annual dilated eye exams, according to the experts involved in the ADA’s eye initiative.

Control is key

Kate Renwick-Espinosa, president of VSP Vision Care, said, “For the more than 100 million people with diabetes or prediabetes, an annual eye exam plays a critical role in preventing blindness.”

There are newer medications that can treat diabetic eye disease, as well as laser procedures and surgeries that can help people with diabetes avoid vision loss.

Welter still regularly sees her eye doctor and a retinal specialist. Her doctors believe if Welter’s problems had started today, they would have been able to save her eye.

“The key to your eye health is control. Keep control of your blood sugar levels, exercise in some form – even if you have to sit in a chair and do exercises, there’s always a way. If you notice any changes in your vision, immediately consult your eye doctor. About 95% of eye disease is treatable if you get to it early,” she said.

Image credit: Shutterstock

Share Button

Core of Play

While pondering an update to my mission statement, I was thinking about how to frame relationships, and this line popped into my mind:

My relationships are based on play.

My relationship with Rachelle fits this like a glove, and I think it’s why we’ve had 10+ happy years together. Same goes for my best friendships.

This applies to more than human relationships, like my relationships with work, creative projects, personal growth experiments, writing, speaking, courses, coaching, hobbies, etc. There’s a core of play when the flow is strong and healthy.

When a relationship loses its core of play, it seems to be on its way out and won’t endure, or it devolves into something not worth preserving.

What happens if you reflect upon past relationships with the lens of play? Any insights generated from that?

If you’re considering a transition in some area of life, could it be that the old path lost its core of play (or never had it to begin with)?

Consider the lens that a healthy relationship is really about play. I’m not saying that this is absolutely true. Just look at your past relationships through this lens, and see if it sparks any interesting realizations or reassessments. When you reflect upon the story arc of the relationship with respect to its changing level of playfulness over time, what do you see?

Also consider that you have a relationship with your work. When that relationship loses its core of play, does it ever work?

Consider the ripples that play generates – connection, caring, bonding, happiness, enjoyment, appreciation, respect, cooperation, etc. Those can be valuable in any relationship context – both in work and your personal life.

Injuries can still occur, but in a context of play (like a game), they’re quickly forgiven. When people lose sight of the play aspect, then an injury may be taken more seriously though.

What can be objectively accomplished with a frame of seriousness that can’t also be accomplished at least as well with a frame of play?

One way to think of play is that it maintains the intensity of seriousness but ditches the attachment. It lightens the experience of full engagement, allowing you to focus on the present moment activity without worrying so much about the outcome. The lens of play removes the clinginess without being forced to descend into goofiness.

I’ve always appreciated playful relationships more than others. That’s been true of romantic and sexual relationships, connections with colleagues, coaching or mentoring relationships, friendships, and even random acquaintances. Playfulness elevates the mundane, making it more stimulating but not stressful.

Play can be a tough value to respect unless you test it enough and see what it does for you. When you observe that investing in play generates strong results with good consistency, it’s easier to trust it. Also observe the results you get when you lose the connection to the core of play. Which results do you prefer?

Share Button

Health24.com | Are baby boomers less sharp than previous generations?

  • Baby boomers (born between 1944 and 1964) are showing more cognitive decline than their parents
  • This is surprising because they have more ‘going for them’ than previous generations
  •  They are, however, experiencing higher rates of obesity and physical inactivity, as well as depression and loneliness

Ageing baby boomers may not be as mentally sharp as their parents were, a new study suggests – raising questions about what the pattern could mean for future dementia rates.

Looking at two decades’ worth of data on US adults, the study found generational differences in tests of cognitive function. That refers to essential mental abilities such as remembering, reasoning and problem-solving.

On average, Americans born in the early- to mid-boomer generation – between 1948 and 1959 – fared a bit worse on those tests than previous generations. The pattern reversed what had been an improving outlook: Americans born between 1942 and 1947 had generally outperformed those born between 1890 and 1923.

More obesity and inactivity

On one hand, the findings are surprising, according to study author Hui Zheng, an associate professor of sociology at Ohio State University.

Boomers would have certain things going for them – including higher education levels, less smoking and access to treatments for heart disease risk factors such as high blood pressure and high cholesterol. All have been linked to lower risks of mental decline.

In addition, studies have found that older adults today seem to have a lower risk of dementia than their parents and grandparents did. However, Zheng said, there’s some evidence that decline is stabilising.

And while boomers have some positives in their corner, they are worse off than previous generations in some respects – including higher rates of obesity and physical inactivity.

In fact, Zheng found that those two patterns seemed to offer a partial explanation for boomers’ lower scores on cognitive tests.

But, he said, there was an even stronger factor: rising rates of depression and loneliness.

It’s not clear why, but some studies have found a link between depression and dementia risk, Zheng said.

Underlying brain changes

Whether depression is actually a risk factor for dementia remains unknown, according to Heather Snyder, vice president of medical and scientific operations for the Alzheimer’s Association.

The dementia process is a long one, and it’s possible that those underlying brain changes cause the depression symptoms, explained Snyder, who wasn’t involved with the study.

“It’s a really important area of research,” she said.

To Snyder, the takeaway from this new study is that people should address modifiable factors that are believed to contribute to dementia. In general, good cardiovascular health supports brain health, so it’s important to eat a healthy diet, exercise and control blood pressure, cholesterol and blood sugar, she said.

The study, recently published online in Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, pulled data from a long-running health study of Americans older than 50.

Zheng focused on more than 30 000 people who took part in the study between 1996 and 2014. All took the same battery of cognitive tests. On average, test scores peaked among “war babies” born between 1942 and 1947 – then dipped among boomers.

Declining cognitive health 

The pattern held true for Americans of all income and education levels, according to Zheng.

And the findings were not explained by deaths among older generations leaving the healthier and hardier behind. Zheng said the cognitive differences between war babies and boomers were apparent before age 55.

“This study suggests cognitive health has started to decline in the US,” Zheng said, adding it’s not clear what the patterns will be for generations younger than the boomers.

Zheng echoed Snyder in stressing the ways that people can protect their brain health.

“Physical health and cognitive health aren’t separate – they’re related,” he said. “Try to spend more time being physically active, and pay attention to your cardiovascular risk factors.”

Image credit: iStock

Share Button