BBC analysis shows the number of health visitors in England has almost halved in the last 10 years.
Category Archives: Wellness Live
AI swarms could hijack democracy without anyone noticing

A new kind of political threat may be emerging, and it is far less visible than protests or traditional voter manipulation. Researchers warn that highly realistic AI-controlled personas could soon play a major role in shaping public opinion and influencing democratic systems.
A recent policy forum paper published in Science describes how large groups of AI-generated personas can convincingly imitate human behavior online. These systems can enter digital communities, participate in discussions, and influence viewpoints at extraordinary speed. Unlike earlier bot networks, these AI agents can coordinate instantly, respond to feedback, and maintain consistent narratives across thousands of accounts.
How AI personas mimic real people online
Rapid progress in large language models and multi-agent systems has made it possible for a single operator to manage vast networks of AI “voices.” These personas can appear authentic, adopt local language and tone, and interact in ways that feel natural to other users.
They are also capable of running millions of small-scale experiments to determine which messages are most persuasive. This allows them to refine their communication strategies in real time and generate what appears to be widespread public agreement. In reality, that consensus is artificially created and designed to influence political discussions.
Deepfakes and fake news signal early risks
Although fully developed AI swarms are still largely theoretical, researchers say there are already warning signs. These include AI-generated deepfakes and fake news outlets that have influenced recent election conversations in countries such as the United States, Taiwan, Indonesia, and India, according to UBC computer scientist Dr. Kevin Leyton-Brown.
At the same time, monitoring organizations have identified pro-Kremlin networks spreading large volumes of online content. This activity is believed to be aimed at shaping the data used to train future AI systems, potentially influencing how those systems behave and what information they prioritize.
Experts warn of growing impact on democracy
Looking ahead, experts believe AI swarms could significantly affect the balance of power in democratic societies. Dr. Leyton-Brown cautioned that these systems are likely to change how people trust information online. “We shouldn’t imagine that society will remain unchanged as these systems emerge. A likely result is decreased trust of unknown voices on social media, which could empower celebrities and make it harder for grassroots messages to break through.”
Researchers suggest that upcoming elections may serve as a critical test for this technology. The key challenge will be recognizing and responding to these AI-driven influence campaigns before they become too widespread to control.
Hundreds of millions at risk as river deltas sink faster than rising seas

A new study published in Nature finds that many of the world’s largest river deltas are subsiding more quickly than global sea levels are rising, putting hundreds of millions of people at potential risk.
The primary drivers behind this trend include intensive groundwater extraction, a decline in sediment carried by rivers, and rapid urban development.
Global Mapping Reveals Widespread Delta Sinking
This research offers the first detailed, high-resolution analysis of elevation loss across 40 river deltas around the world. The project was led by Leonard Ohenhen, a former Virginia Tech graduate student who is now an assistant professor at the University of California, Irvine. The work was overseen by Virginia Tech geoscientists Manoochehr Shirzaei and Susanna Werth.
Results show that almost every delta studied contains areas where the land is dropping faster than nearby sea levels are rising. In 18 of the 40 deltas, this downward movement, known as subsidence, already exceeds local sea-level rise. That trend is increasing near-term flood risk for more than 236 million people.
Satellite Data Tracks Elevation Loss Across Continents
Researchers used advanced satellite radar systems to measure changes in surface elevation across deltas on five continents. The resulting high-resolution maps capture changes at a scale of 75 square meters per pixel, allowing scientists to detect localized patterns of sinking.
Several major deltas are experiencing especially rapid elevation loss, including those of the Mekong, Nile, Chao Phraya, Ganges-Brahmaputra, Mississippi, and Yellow rivers.
“In many places, groundwater extraction, sediment starvation, and rapid urbanization are causing land to sink much faster than previously recognized,” Ohenhen said.
In some areas, the rate of sinking is more than double the current global pace of sea-level rise.
Human Activity Driving Accelerated Subsidence
“Our results show that subsidence isn’t a distant future problem — it is happening now, at scales that exceed climate-driven sea-level rise in many deltas,” said Shirzaei, co-author and director of Virginia Tech’s Earth Observation and Innovation Lab.
The study identifies groundwater depletion as the strongest overall factor linked to delta subsidence, although the main cause varies by region.
“When groundwater is over-pumped or sediments fail to reach the coast, the land surface drops,” said Werth, who co-led the groundwater analysis. “These processes are directly linked to human decisions, which means the solutions also lie within our control.”
The research was supported by the National Science Foundation, the Department of Defense, and NASA.
Keir Starmer Fights For Survival In Make-Or-Break Commons Showdown

Keir Starmer will battle to save his job as he faces MPs amid calls for him to resign over the Peter Mandelson vetting scandal.
A Labour peer is among those demanding the prime minister quit after it was revealed the shamed former US ambassador failed security vetting before taking up the plumb diplomatic role.
Advertisement
Starmer said he was “furious” that he was not told that Olly Robbins, the top civil servant in the Foreign Office, had ultimately cleared Mandelson to carry out the job.
The PM only found out last Tuesday – and Robbins was sacked on Thursday night.
Starmer has been accused of lying to parliament and the public for previously stating that all of the appropriate vetting processes had been followed before Mandelson was appointed.
He will make a Commons statement on Monday before facing questions from MPs about what he knew and when.
Advertisement
Supporters of Olly Robbins have insisted he was legally precluded from telling the PM that Mandelson had failed the security vetting, but that has been denied by Downing Street.
“No law stops civil servants sensibly flagging UK Security Vetting recommendations, while rightly protecting detailed sensitive vetting information, to allow Ministers to make judgements on appointments or on explaining matters to Parliament,” the government said.
Scottish secretary Douglas Alexander told Sky News: “There are rightfully and reasonably important questions that need to be answered today. Keir Starmer’s going to set out all the facts. The right place for those questions to be answered are at the despatch box in the House of Commons.
Advertisement
“But we saw the leader of the opposition, as recently as Friday, claiming that the prime minister lied.
“That central contention that he wilfully and intentionally misled parliament and the public now relies, given what has emerged since then, relies on what would need to be a growing conspiracy, not just of every minister involved in this process, but of a growing list of civil servants.
“These judgments matter, and in that sense people need to reach a judgment in the round. The right place to do that’s in the House of Commons this afternoon, and the prime minister will set out his case.”
Advertisement
Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Olivia Colman’s Heartstopper Character Recast In New Spin-Off Film
Olivia Colman’s character in Heartstopper will be played by a different actor in the show’s upcoming film.
The Oscar winner received widespread praise for her portrayal of Nick’s mum, Sarah Nelson, in the first two seasons of the Netflix teen drama.
Advertisement
However, in its third iteration, Olivia was unable to appear, with Hayley Atwell instead appearing as Nick’s aunt, who served a maternal role in his life for these episodes.
Over the weekend, it was confirmed that in the forthcoming movie Heartstopper Forever, the character of Sarah has been completely recast due to Olivia’s unavailability.
In her absence, the role will now be played by Line Of Duty and Motherland star Anna Maxwell Martin.
Advertisement
Heartstopper creator Alice Oseman told Netflix’s Tudum: “When beginning to work on the Heartstopper Forever screenplay, I knew how important it was that Sarah, Nick’s mum, appeared in the story.
“Since season one, we have seen how close Nick is with his mum; she’s one of the few people he can turn to in moments of crisis. While in season three, we were able to tweak the story to avoid any appearance of Sarah, it felt nonsensical for her to be absent from this final chapter, given some of the emotional struggles Nick faces.”
They continued: “Sadly, Olivia Colman was not able to join us for the film, so we made the very difficult decision to recast the role, rather than exclude the character. We are deeply grateful for Olivia’s beautiful performance as Sarah in seasons one and two of Heartstopper, through such iconic moments as Nick coming out as bisexual, and we know that her performance will live on in the hearts of every Heartstopper fan.
Advertisement
“We are overjoyed to welcome the incredible Anna Maxwell Martin into the role of Sarah for Heartstopper Forever. Anna perfectly embodies Sarah’s gentle, down-to-earth energy, and it was magical to witness her scenes with Kit Connor during the film shoot. I can’t wait for Heartstopper fans to experience her interpretation of Sarah Nelson.”

Samuel Dore/Netflix
Heartstopper Forever will premiere on Netflix later this year, and serve as the final outing for Nick and Charlie, played by Kit Connor and Joe Locke.
Advertisement
As well as the usual returning cast members, including Yasmin Finney and Will Gao, it’s been confirmed that Bafta winner Derek Jacobi will also be playing a new character in the film.
After 200 years scientists finally crack the “dolomite problem”

For more than two centuries, scientists tried and failed to grow dolomite in the lab under conditions thought to match how it forms in nature. A recent study has finally changed that. Researchers from the University of Michigan and Hokkaido University in Sapporo, Japan succeeded by developing a new theory based on detailed atomic simulations.
Their work solves a long-standing geological puzzle known as the “Dolomite Problem.” Dolomite is a widespread mineral found in iconic locations such as the Dolomite mountains in Italy, Niagara Falls and Utah’s Hoodoos. It is abundant in rocks older than 100 million years, yet it is rarely seen forming in more recent environments.
“If we understand how dolomite grows in nature, we might learn new strategies to promote the crystal growth of modern technological materials,” said Wenhao Sun, the Dow Early Career Professor of Materials Science and Engineering at U-M and the corresponding author of the paper published in Science.
Why Dolomite Growth Is So Slow
The key breakthrough came from understanding what disrupts dolomite as it forms. In water, minerals typically grow as atoms attach in an orderly way to the surface of a crystal. Dolomite behaves differently because its structure is made of alternating layers of calcium and magnesium.
As the crystal grows, these two elements often attach randomly instead of lining up correctly. This creates structural defects that block further growth. The result is an extremely slow process. At that rate, forming a single well-ordered layer of dolomite could take up to 10 million years.
Nature’s Built-In Reset Mechanism
The researchers realized that these defects are not permanent. Atoms that are out of place are less stable and more likely to dissolve when exposed to water. In natural environments, cycles such as rainfall or tidal changes repeatedly wash away these flawed areas.
Over time, this process clears the surface so new, properly arranged layers can form. Instead of taking millions of years for a single layer, dolomite can gradually build up in far shorter intervals. Over long geological periods, this leads to the large deposits seen in ancient rock formations.
Simulating Crystal Growth at the Atomic Level
To test their idea, the team needed to model how atoms interact as dolomite forms. This requires calculating the energy involved in countless interactions between electrons and atoms, which is usually extremely demanding in terms of computing power.
Researchers at U-M’s Predictive Structure Materials Science (PRISMS) Center developed software that simplifies this challenge. It calculates the energy for certain atomic arrangements and then predicts others based on the symmetry of the crystal structure.
“Our software calculates the energy for some atomic arrangements, then extrapolates to predict the energies for other arrangements based on the symmetry of the crystal structure,” said Brian Puchala, one of the software’s lead developers and an associate research scientist in U-M’s Department of Materials Science and Engineering.
This approach made it possible to simulate dolomite growth over timescales that reflect real geological processes.
“Each atomic step would normally take over 5,000 CPU hours on a supercomputer. Now, we can do the same calculation in 2 milliseconds on a desktop,” said Joonsoo Kim, a doctoral student of materials science and engineering and the study’s first author.
Lab Experiment Confirms the Theory
Natural settings where dolomite still forms today often experience cycles of flooding followed by drying, which supports the team’s theory. However, direct experimental evidence was still needed.
That evidence came from Yuki Kimura, a professor of materials science at Hokkaido University, and Tomoya Yamazaki, a postdoctoral researcher in his lab. They used an unusual property of transmission electron microscopes to recreate the process.
“Electron microscopes usually use electron beams just to image samples,” Kimura said. “However, the beam can also split water, which makes acid that can cause crystals to dissolve. Usually this is bad for imaging, but in this case, dissolution is exactly what we wanted.”
The team placed a small dolomite crystal in a solution containing calcium and magnesium. They then pulsed the electron beam 4,000 times over two hours, repeatedly dissolving the defects as they formed.
After this process, the crystal grew to about 100 nanometers, or roughly 250,000 times smaller than an inch. That growth represented around 300 layers of dolomite. Previous experiments had never produced more than five layers.
Implications for Modern Technology
Solving the Dolomite Problem does more than explain a geological mystery. It also offers insight into how to control crystal growth in advanced materials used in modern technology.
“In the past, crystal growers who wanted to make materials without defects would try to grow them really slowly,” Sun said. “Our theory shows that you can grow defect-free materials quickly, if you periodically dissolve the defects away during growth.”
This concept could help improve the production of semiconductors, solar panels, batteries and other high-performance technologies.
The research was funded by the American Chemical Society PRF New Doctoral Investigator grant, the U.S. Department of Energy and the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science.
Trump Once Again Threatened War Crimes On The Eve Of Iran Peace Talks — And His Lackey Has An Interesting Interpretation

White House Energy Secretary Chris Wright called President Donald Trump a “creative negotiator” when asked about his threats to “knock out every single” power plant and bridge in Iran.
As peace talks between the United States and Iran appear to be at a stalemate amid a tenuous ceasefire agreement and continued jockeying over control of the Strait of Hormuz, the president demanded Iran accept America’s terms or face his full wrath in a Sunday morning Truth Social post.
Advertisement
“NO MORE MR. NICE GUY!” Trump declared, calling the US’s diplomatic offer “very fair and reasonable.”
Asked if the president’s intimidation tactics could “complicate” negotiations with Iran during an appearance on “Fox News Sunday” just hours later, Wright said he had full confidence in Trump.
“The president is using every way he can to get leverage over the regime and bring this conflict to an end,” he told host Shannon Bream. “He’s a creative negotiator, he uses pressure in different ways.”
Advertisement
“He uses uncertainty in different ways and I think as you’ve seen in the last 16 months, generally it leads to good results,” the cabinet member went on. “I don’t think we’ll see any surprises here.”
Wright envisioned reaching a “nice end to this conflict,” which he said would rescue Iran’s regional neighbors from “constant terror” and also guarantee a free “flow of goods” through the Strait of Hormuz.
Advertisement
“Imagine a nuclear armed Iran, not far away from that reality,” he said. “This is going to put an end to it.”
Wright stuck by his support for Trump’s strategy in a separate Sunday interview on CNN, where host Jake Tapper asked the secretary if he was worried strikes on civilian infrastructure could “constitute a war crime.”
“The president is looking for maximum leverage,” he said, later adding, “No, I’m not worried about that.”
Advertisement
Earlier this month, Trump triggered international panic with a near-identical ultimatum, telling Iran to “open the fuckin’ Strait” of Hormuz within two days or find themselves “living in hell” via Truth Social.
After upping the ante with a post warning “a whole civilization will die tonight” just hours before his 8pm April 7 deadline, a two-week ceasefire was announced.
A new force of nature is reshaping the planet, study finds

Human societies have not just adapted to the natural world. They have steadily learned how to transform it. Drawing on research from archaeology, ecology, anthropology, and evolutionary theory, Erle Ellis, professor of geography and environmental systems at the University of Maryland Baltimore County, explains how cultural practices have evolved to give humans extraordinary influence over the ecosystems that sustain them.
From early uses of fire to cook food and shape landscapes to modern systems like industrial agriculture, global trade, and rapidly growing cities, societies have developed powerful tools and institutions. These social and cultural advances have allowed humans to reshape the planet on a massive scale while improving their ability to survive and thrive.
Understanding the Anthropocene and Human Impact
Ellis is a leading researcher studying the Anthropocene, the current geological age defined by the large-scale impact of human activity on Earth. He leads the Anthroecology Lab, which examines how human societies interact with ecosystems at every level, from local environments to the entire planet. His work focuses on how these relationships can be guided toward more sustainable outcomes.
In recent years, the concept of the Anthropocene has gained even broader attention across science and policy discussions. Ongoing research continues to reinforce the idea that human activity is now one of the dominant forces shaping Earth’s systems, from climate patterns to biodiversity.
Progress for People, Costs for the Planet
Human innovation has brought major gains in health, longevity, and quality of life. At the same time, these advances have come with serious environmental costs. Climate change, species extinctions, and widespread pollution are all linked to the ways human societies have expanded and intensified their use of natural resources.
These challenges highlight the need for action. A better future depends on addressing environmental damage while maintaining the benefits that human progress has made possible.
Beyond Crisis Thinking Toward Collective Action
Ellis argues that focusing only on environmental crisis can miss a key point. The same collective abilities that allowed societies to transform the planet can also be used to improve it. History shows that when people cooperate, they can solve complex problems and reshape their surroundings in positive ways.
Rather than relying solely on narratives of limits or collapse, long-term solutions may depend on tapping into shared goals and collective ambition. Recent research continues to support this perspective, emphasizing that social cooperation and cultural change are essential for addressing global environmental challenges.
The Power of Social and Cultural Systems
Ellis also highlights the limits of relying only on natural sciences to predict and manage the rapid changes seen in the Anthropocene. While scientific data is critical, it is social and cultural systems that have consistently enabled societies to adapt and succeed.
Institutions, shared values, and collective decision-making play a central role in shaping outcomes. These same systems will be crucial in building more sustainable relationships with the natural world.
If a better future is to be achieved, these capabilities must extend beyond human societies to include the broader web of life.
Reconnecting People and Nature
“Re-emphasizing the kinship relationships among all living beings — our common evolutionary ancestry — is a start, combined with new ways to connect people and nature, from remote sensing to webcams, to nature apps, to community conservation reserves, corridor networks, and ecotourism,” shares Ellis. “Aspirations for a better future must also make peace with the past through restoration of Indigenous and traditional sovereignty over lands and waters.”
This perspective aligns with growing global efforts to restore ecosystems, support Indigenous stewardship, and use technology to strengthen connections between people and nature.
A Future Shaped by Human Potential
Ellis stresses that the ability to create a more sustainable and equitable future is not new. The tools, knowledge, and social systems needed to drive change have existed for decades. What is often missing is widespread recognition and motivation to act.
The challenge now is to turn awareness into action. By recognizing the scale of human influence and embracing shared aspirations for a better world, societies can begin to use their collective power to shape a more positive future for both people and the planet.
Scientists develop dirt-powered fuel cell that could replace batteries

Researchers led by Northwestern University have developed a fuel cell that generates electricity using microbes naturally found in soil. The device, roughly the size of a paperback book, produces small amounts of power by capturing energy released as these microorganisms break down organic material in dirt.
This soil-powered system is designed to run underground sensors used in precision agriculture and environmental monitoring. It offers a potential alternative to traditional batteries, which contain toxic and flammable materials, rely on complex global supply chains, and contribute to growing electronic waste.
Powering Sensors Without Batteries
To demonstrate its capabilities, the team used the fuel cell to operate sensors that measure soil moisture and detect touch. This touch-sensing ability could help monitor wildlife movement, such as animals passing through a field. The system also includes a small antenna that sends data wirelessly by reflecting existing radio frequency signals, which keeps energy use extremely low.
The device proved reliable across a wide range of conditions. It functioned in both dry soil and flooded environments, and it produced more sustained power than similar systems, lasting about 120% longer.
The study was published in the Proceedings of the Association for Computing Machinery on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies. The researchers also released their designs, tutorials and simulation tools publicly so others can build on the work.
Why Soil Microbes Matter for the Internet of Things
“The number of devices in the Internet of Things (IoT) is constantly growing,” said Northwestern alumnus Bill Yen, who led the work. “If we imagine a future with trillions of these devices, we cannot build every one of them out of lithium, heavy metals and toxins that are dangerous to the environment. We need to find alternatives that can provide low amounts of energy to power a decentralized network of devices. In a search for solutions, we looked to soil microbial fuel cells, which use special microbes to break down soil and use that low amount of energy to power sensors. As long as there is organic carbon in the soil for the microbes to break down, the fuel cell can potentially last forever.”
Microbial fuel cells, often called MFCs, work somewhat like a battery. They include an anode, cathode and electrolyte, but instead of chemical reactions, they rely on bacteria that naturally release electrons. When these electrons move through the system, they create an electric current.
“These microbes are ubiquitous; they already live in soil everywhere,” said Northwestern’s George Wells, a senior author on the study. “We can use very simple engineered systems to capture their electricity. We’re not going to power entire cities with this energy. But we can capture minute amounts of energy to fuel practical, low-power applications.”
Challenges With Solar and Battery-Powered Sensors
Precision agriculture depends on large networks of sensors that continuously track soil conditions such as moisture, nutrients and contaminants. These data help farmers make more informed decisions and improve crop yields.
But powering those sensors is a major challenge. Batteries eventually run out and must be replaced, which is impractical across large farms. Solar panels can also be unreliable because they become dirty, require sunlight and take up space.
“If you want to put a sensor out in the wild, in a farm or in a wetland, you are constrained to putting a battery in it or harvesting solar energy,” Yen said. “Solar panels don’t work well in dirty environments because they get covered with dirt, do not work when the sun isn’t out and take up a lot of space. Batteries also are challenging because they run out of power. Farmers are not going to go around a 100-acre farm to regularly swap out batteries or dust off solar panels.”
The researchers instead focused on harvesting energy directly from the soil itself, turning the environment into the power source.
Why Earlier Microbial Fuel Cells Fell Short
Soil-based microbial fuel cells have existed since 1911, but they have struggled to deliver consistent performance. These systems need both moisture and oxygen to function properly, which can be difficult to maintain underground, especially in dry conditions.
“Although MFCs have existed as a concept for more than a century, their unreliable performance and low output power have stymied efforts to make practical use of them, especially in low-moisture conditions,” Yen said.
A New Design Improves Performance
To address these issues, the team spent two years developing and testing different designs. They compared four versions and collected nine months of performance data before selecting a final prototype, which they tested outdoors.
The breakthrough came from a change in geometry. Instead of placing the anode and cathode parallel to each other, the new design positions them perpendicular.
The anode, made of carbon felt (an inexpensive, abundant conductor to capture the microbes’ electrons), lies horizontally beneath the soil. The cathode, made of a conductive metal, extends vertically to the surface.
This structure helps solve several problems at once. The top of the device remains exposed to air, ensuring a steady oxygen supply. At the same time, the lower portion stays buried in moist soil, maintaining hydration even during dry conditions. A protective cap prevents debris from entering, while a small air chamber allows airflow.
The design also improves resilience during flooding. A waterproof coating allows the cathode to keep functioning, and the vertical layout helps it dry gradually after water recedes.
Strong Results in Real-World Conditions
The final prototype performed well across a wide range of soil conditions, from moderately dry soil (41% water by volume) to fully submerged environments. On average, it generated 68 times more power than required to run its sensors.
These results suggest the system is robust enough for real-world deployment in agricultural fields or natural environments.
Ongoing Research and Future Potential
Since the study was first published, interest in microbial fuel cells has continued to grow. Researchers are working to improve efficiency, stability and materials, including exploring biodegradable designs that could further reduce environmental impact.
The Northwestern team notes that all parts of their system can be sourced from common hardware materials. They are now aiming to create fully biodegradable versions that avoid complex supply chains and conflict minerals.
“With the COVID-19 pandemic, we all became familiar with how a crisis can disrupt the global supply chain for electronics,” said study co-author Josiah Hester, a former Northwestern faculty member who is now at the Georgia Institute of Technology. “We want to build devices that use local supply chains and low-cost materials so that computing is accessible for all communities.”
While the technology is not intended to power large systems, it could play an important role in supporting low-energy devices across agriculture, environmental monitoring and the expanding Internet of Things.
Key Points
- Scientists have created a new fuel cell that uses naturally occurring soil microbes to generate electricity
- The system can power underground sensors that track soil moisture and even detect movement or touch
- It continues working in a wide range of conditions, from dry soil to fully flooded environments
- This technology could offer a cleaner alternative to batteries for sensors used in precision agriculture
The study, “Soil-powered computing: The engineer’s guide to practical soil microbial fuel cell design,” was supported by the National Science Foundation (award number CNS-2038853), the Agricultural and Food Research Initiative (award number 2023-67021-40628) from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, VMware Research and 3M.
The Celebrity Traitors: 11 Stars Who Turned Down The Chance To Be On The Line-Up
As far as celebrity reality shows go, the line-up for the first season of The Traitors’ star-studded counterpart is going to be a hard one to beat.
The cast of Celebrity Traitors’ inaugural outing featured a host of impressive names – including many who’d never done reality TV before – that encompassed award-winning broadcasters and actors, athletes at the top of their game, chart-topping musicians and all-round national treasures.
Advertisement
But as revered as many of the celebrities on the line-up were, other famous faces turned down the BBC’s offer to appear on the show outright for a variety of reasons.
With filming getting underway on season two in the not-too-distant future, here are 11 recognisable names who are reported to have said no to appearing on The Celebrity Traitors…
Ricky Gervais
Advertisement
When The Celebrity Traitors was initially revealed to be in the works last year, Ricky Gervais was one of the first names reported to be on bosses’ wishlist.
However, he quickly made it clear that he had no intention of taking part because he’s “too busy” and, in his words, “there’s no way they could afford me”.
Jonathan Ross later claimed that Ricky phoned him about the offer, but the Office creator was unconvinced because he felt that “bigger names” would be easier targets – which the talk show host conceded after the series aired that he was completely “right” about.
Advertisement
Richard Osman
Meanwhile, former Pointless presenter Richard Osman has openly said he turned down the show because there was no way for producers to guarantee his one criteria for taking part.
“I said I would only do it if I could be a Traitor,” he told Good Morning Britain in October.
He continued: “I couldn’t bear – if I [were] a Faithful – that thing where you go back to your room at night and you’re just lying there, [knowing there were] three people up in that tower, having a load of fun in cloaks and filming something.”
Advertisement
Karren Brady

Apprentice staple Karren Brady made her feelings clear about Celebrity Traitors during an interview with Metro.
“I was asked and the answer was no,” she said. “One, I’ve never seen it. Two, I don’t have the time.”
Advertisement
She continued: “I have a full-time job and The Apprentice is filmed just in my sweet spot in the summer when the football season is over, so I can just about fit in. But that’s it.”
Martin Lewis

Ken McKay/ITV/Shutterstock
When the line-up for Celebrity Traitors season one was first reported in the press, money-saving expert Martin Lewis admitted he had major “FOMO” after having to reject an offer to participate.
Advertisement
“I was asked if I wanted to do it, but said no as I couldn’t commit the time,” he told his Instagram followers. “I hadn’t watched it then (but watched the last series after that and loved it) so now feel a little gutted – though I still don’t have the time. Sigh!”
Danny Dyer
Like Martin, Danny Dyer claimed during an episode of his podcast Live And Let Dyer that Traitors producers had been “sniffing round me” while putting together the cast of season one, but turned down them down as he’d not watched the original show at the time.
Advertisement
However, as the Traitors has been putting together its line-up for season two, it seems that Danny has had something of a change of heart.
“If they ask me I’ll do it, but no one’s asked me,” the Rivals actor claimed earlier this year. “I would fucking declare it. I’m not on it, you’ll see when it comes on.”
Miriam Margolyes

David Hartley/Shutterstock
Advertisement
True to form, Miriam Margolyes had no issues revealing exactly why she had no intention of signing up for Celebrity Traitors.
“I was offered this job just recently – and I can’t think of anything I’d rather less do,” she insisted during a Q&A at the Cheltenham Festival. “I’m not into that. I’ve never watched it, I don’t intend to watch it.”
The Bafta winner added: “If they want to do it for money, well, that’s fair enough [but] you won’t get me on it.”
Advertisement
Daisy May Cooper

via Associated Press
When the Celebrity Traitors line-up was first starting to take shape, comedian Daisy May Cooper was heavily rumoured to be competing alongside her brother (and This Country co-star) Charlie, with producers reported to be hoping to capitalise on the drama past seasons of the regular show where contestants have known one another outside the show.
The Sun later claimed that the duo had pulled out of the show just weeks before filming was set to begin, due to scheduling issues.
Advertisement
Like Danny, it seems that Daisy could potentially be putting in an appearance on season two, despite having swerved the show’s first outing.
Andy Murray
Similarly, The Sun claimed in 2024 that tennis pro Andy Murray and his mum Judy had also been in consideration for the reality show.
Advertisement
However, they apparently turned it down, at which point the tabloid claimed bosses turned to Daisy May and Charlie as a duo with a family connection (in the end, none of the Celebrity Traitors wound up in the castle with people they were related to, although there were definitely connections outside the show that became part of the gameplay).
Lorraine Kelly

via Associated Press
In February 2025, The Sun claimed that daytime legend Lorraine Kelly had been contacted by the BBC with an offer to appear on The Celebrity Traitors.
Advertisement
However, the tabloid said that while Lorraine was “flattered” to have been invited, she had to turn it down for scheduling reasons.
Lorraine later told comedian Joe Wilkinson that had she known he’d be on the line-up, she’d have been more inclined to sign up.
Anna Maxwell Martin

via Associated Press
Advertisement
During an interview on Jonathan Ross’ talk show in April 2026, Anna Maxwell Martin was asked directly if she’d ever been approached about taking part in Celebrity Traitors.
The Line Of Duty star then admitted she had been, but made a realisation about the show that put her off the idea.
“I can see from the civilian one how late it gets on that show,” she explained. “That’s a Scottish summer – and they’re not leaving that castle until it gets dark. That’s 11pm, 12am… if you’re a Traitor, it’s 1am, 2am. I want to be in bed by 8pm.”
Advertisement
Peter Capaldi

via Associated Press
While most of the stars on this list relate to Celebrity Traitors’ first run, Doctor Who star Peter Capaldi is one of the new prolific names to have turned down season two.
Peter admitted that because the show “propels” its contestants “into the public eye” and to a “level of fame” and “exposure” that he’s personally not comfortable with, he had to say no to the offer.
Advertisement













