We Asked 13 Men What They Wish Women Knew About Sex

From what we’ve seen on sitcoms, novels, social media and the brunch table, we carry plenty of assumptions about men and sex.

We think we know how often they think about it, what they want, what they’re attracted to and what they’re looking for in the bedroom.

Meanwhile, women can carry their own share of shame around sex, allowing insecurities or perceived flaws to get in the way of pleasure and intimacy. Many of us are engaging in sex with a bunch of things on our minds, or too afraid to ask for what we really want.

But what if we just asked men?

There are plenty of things men wish the women they sleep with knew about sex, and they’re not necessarily the kinds of things that come up on a first date. These are the thoughts, feelings, preferences and little truths that can be harder to say out loud, even with someone you’re intimate with.

Obviously, sex should always be about what you both want and feel comfortable with, but it’s helpful to know what’s going on in their mind in the meantime.

So, we asked 13 men what they would want women to know about sex. Their answers were funny, reassuring, occasionally obvious, and at times surprisingly vulnerable. We never would’ve guessed some of these answers.

Here’s what they had to say.

What do you wish women knew about sex?

“Sometimes I want to be the little spoon.” — Liam S.

“Being turned on with nothing to do about it is actually so uncomfortable. It’s not your fault, and you don’t need to do anything about it, but it’s just a painful fact.” — Noah M.

“You don’t need to look like a supermodel. That’s not what I’m after, I want your body how it is. I don’t think women know how sexy we find them as they are.” — Freddie M.

“During blow jobs, don’t neglect the balls.” — John J.

“Touch us around our whole body, please.”

NanoStockk via Getty Images

“Touch us around our whole body, please.”

“Putting a condom on can be a lot of pressure, so please help to keep the vibe sexy. Touch us or yourself, say hot things. Nothing is worse than going flat in the process.” — Mattie R.

“We are insecure, too. Just like it helps you to hear how beautiful and sexy you are, it would be really nice to get some compliments back.” — Toby M.

“Don’t just touch our genitals. Touch us around our whole body, please.” — David W.

“Please make it clear when you orgasm. One, because it’s hot. Two, because it’s helpful to know we’re doing stuff right.” — Arthur H.

“Please don’t force it if you’re not in the mood. That feels awful for us, too. I never want you to be pressured to be intimate with me.” — Samuel J.

“You look so good in doggy style. I know some women worry about how prominent their butthole is in that position, but I promise you men could not care less! We’re too obsessed with your body and how good it feels.” — Ben N.

“Reverse cowgirl is more terrifying than enjoyable. Yes, we love the view, but the angle is scary so we’re just worried about breaking our penis.” — Joshua D.

“Men don’t always want sex more than women do, that’s outdated and just makes us feel ashamed of our lower sex drive. It’s great if you want sex more often, but please stop making us feel like we’re the problem then, as you wouldn’t like that back.” — Josh B.

“No one cares if you fart or make other noises. Please don’t be embarrassed. Our brains are focused on something very different in that moment. You’re allowed to be human, too.” — Reiss S.

Share Button

Huh – It Turns Out Smarter People See Themselves As Less Hot

Most of us are pretty bad at judging our own attractiveness, especially if we’re considered less conventionally good-looking.

But which traits make us more (or less) likely to rate ourselves highly in the first place?

We know that people who are broadly considered beautiful tend to accurately “rank”, or even slightly underestimate, their looks. And a new paper published in Evolutionary Psychology suggests six other traits might come into play here, too.

People who scored lower on cognitive tests tended to see themselves as more attractive

The authors of this study wanted to see how personality traits and demographic factors might affect someone’s “self-assessed physical attractiveness” (SAPA for short).

They did this by conducting two studies involving 799 and 292 participants, respectively.

For the first test, people were asked to rate their own attractiveness on a scale from zero to 100. On average, people gave themselves a score of 58.

Men gave themselves about three to four points more than women did, however, and people who’d graduated university ranked themselves 3.5 points higher.

Being religious, optimistic, competitive, emotionally well-adjusted, and left-wing seemed positively correlated to a higher SAPA figure, too. But people who had more “ambiguity acceptance” typically scored themselves lower.

For the second study, participants’ SAPA rankings were compared to their personality, demographic, and ideological traits. This time, however, researchers added a timed cognitive test called the General Intelligence Assessment (GIA), too.

The GIA assesses people’s “verbal reasoning, perceptual speed, number speed and accuracy, word meaning, and spatial visualisation”.

Once again, university graduates, people with better emotional adjustment, and optimists seemed associated with greater SAPA rankings.

But gender, political leanings, competitiveness, religiosity, and ambiguity acceptance didn’t hold up this time around.

As for the GIA results, people with higher scores tended to be slightly more likely to say they were less attractive than average.

Intelligence has been linked to perceived attractiveness

This last finding might be surprising given that other studies have linked attractiveness to intelligence.

But the study authors wrote, “it could be that people with higher general intelligence were more realistic (and honest) about their physical attractiveness”.

Additionally, the difference in SAPA scores between people who got better GIA results and those with worse ones was only slight.

Share Button

Reform MP Refuses To Condemn Farage Ally Who Called Kemi Badenoch A ‘Nigerian Scammer’

Danny Kruger has failed to condemn a prominent ally of Nigel Farage who called Kemi Badenoch a “Nigerian scammer”.

Raheem Kassam was accused of “launching racist slurs” against the Tory leader on X.

He sked if she was a “walking gaffe or an illegal immigrant”, using her full name Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke Badenoch.

The political activist and former Ukip adviser is now a high-profile Reform supporter.

But when invited to criticise Kassam’s comments on The Telegraph’s podcast, Reform MP Kruger refused to weigh in.

Tim Stanley, co-host of the Daily T, asked: “Why won’t the party distance itself from this man?”

Kruger, who defected from the Tory frontbench in September last year, replied: “Raheem Kassam is not a party spokesman. He’s free to say what he likes.

“A bit of rambunctious debate online is part of our politics. So I’ve got nothing to say to that.”

Stanley queried how Kruger did not immediately call those remarks “disgusting” or make it clear he did not like them.

“That raises questions, I’m uncomfortable with that I have to say,” the journalist said. “Why not just call it for what it is, which is a disgusting and unnecessary slur?”

“Tim you’re inviting me to get involved in fratricidal conflict within the Reform family and I don’t want to do that. I think what we want to do is focus on the real challenges our country faces,” the Reform MP said.

The clash comes as Reform is already facing intense scrutiny over its vetting process.

An undercover sting from ITV journalists found Reform councillors and would-be candidates had made a series of highly offensive remarks over the last year.

One activist and aspiring MP told a secret reporter that he was “pretty hardline about Islam” and that asylum seekers should be put in “concentration camps”.

A senior Reform official also accused party leader Nigel Farage of “protecting” a Reform mayoral candidate who said former deputy prime minister David Lammy should “go back home to the Caribbean”.

Party leader Farage also claimed those caught in the undercover investigation might have been “provoked”.

He added: “I put it to you, if you went and spoke to hundreds of Conservative councillors and tried to provoke them you would find all sorts of things and all sorts of comments said.”

Responding to Kruger’s comments, a Labour spokesperson said: “It’s astonishing that Reform’s top team can’t bring themselves to condemn blatant racism.

“This isn’t about party politics. It’s about standing up for our shared values.

“After ITV’s investigation exposed just how widespread this problem is in Reform – it’s time for Nigel Farage to finally act.

“Farage should lay down a marker by calling out this vile language and state it is unacceptable in his party. If he doesn’t act, it will speak volumes about just who Reform really are.”

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Share Button

Donald Trump Is Officially In Bed With Putin. How Did We Get Here?

Donald Trump chucked years of careful western diplomacy in the bin over the last fortnight by siding with Vladimir Putin over the Ukraine war.

The US president has agreed to a sanctions-busting deal to buy diesel from Russia in the hope of bringing down sky-high pump prices ahead of November’s US midterm elections.

While he is not on the ballot paper, Trump risks being a lame duck president if the Republicans lose their majorities in the Senate and House of Representatives.

Trump even abandoned a new law imposing sweeping sanctions on Russia just weeks after the US Senate voted in favour of it.

But he did not stop there. He also unilaterally declared an “energy ceasefire” between Ukraine and Russia – then gave Putin a free pass after he kept bombing Ukrainian targets.

Hours after a missile killed a Ukrainian child in a buggy, Trump willingly turned a blind eye to the violence and told the media that Russia has been “fine” on Ukraine.

Kyiv has also accused the White House of suspending its access to Elon Musk’s Starlink satellite network too, which Ukraine needs to detect incoming Russian missiles.

The tech tycoon has blamed the White House for any problems with his system, though the US administration has denied it.

But Ukraine thinks it’s a deliberate move to pressure them into compromising with Putin.

Trump has started calling for Volodymyr Zelenskyy to be ousted as Ukraine’s president, too, while his envoy Steve Witkoff told Putin he was a “humanitarian”.

While the mercurial American leader has flip-flopped between supporting Ukraine and Russia since his second term started – often siding with whichever country which appeared to be winning the war – he has clearly crossed a line with these interventions.

He has angered both Democrats and his own Republicans, with senior senators publicly claiming “Putin is playing Trump like a fiddle”.

Trump has also worried allies abroad, plunging the post-World War 2 order into chaos and sending Ukraine into a state of panic.

His former press secretary Anthony Scaramucci has even speculated that “Trump is an agent of Putin” now.

How did we get to a point where the leader of the free world is bending the knee to a wartime dictator and being accused of being a traitor?

Listen to this week’s Commons People as we look at the repercussions of Trump’s decision – and what might happen next.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Share Button

Finally – Airbnb Just Banned Its Hosts’ Most Annoying Rules

Short-term holiday rental site Airbnb may have just made your next stay a lot more relaxing.

The digital platform, which allows homeowners to lease their accommodation to customers online, has limited what hosts can ask their guests to do at their property, including cleaning tasks.

Airbnb guests generally pay a cleaning fee when they book their stay. But some hosts have been spotted giving their visitors tasks – like stripping beds or taking the rubbish out – too.

What do the new Airbnb host rules say?

The company’s site says hosts can now include up to seven house rules and may also add “reasonable” requests.

But they’re no longer usually permitted to ask for jobs that “require significant effort or time, or would typically be performed by a cleaner, including stripping the bed, taking trash offsite, or washing and putting away dishes”.

That’s not to say hosts can’t sometimes ask for things in exceptional circumstances that might otherwise seem unreasonable. For instance, the site says you can ask a guest to limit showering if the area your property is in is facing water restrictions.

Airbnb site

Oberon Copeland @veryinformed.com

Airbnb site

A host’s house rules and requests have to be visible in the appropriate part of the listing page, so customers can work out if they think they’d be OK with them. And hosts can’t change their rules after a customer has made a booking, either.

Nor can property owners fine guests, ask visitors to sign another contract off the site, or ask for sensitive information like government ID “except where required by law and in other limited circumstances”.

When will these new rules be introduced?

They’re set to come in for properties booked on or after 20 November 2026.

“If a house rule or host request does not meet the requirements above, we may take appropriate action, including educating the host on our policies, asking the host to update their listing page, and issuing warnings,” Airbnb’s rule page ended.

Should the issue persist, it might result in a notice that lets bookers know about the problem on an Airbnb member’s listing page or limiting their visibility on the site’s search engine.

Share Button

I’m A Green Party MP. Here’s Why I Think Developing The Jackdaw Gas Field Is Huge Mistake

Andy Burnham promised he would be different.

He stood on a roof in Manchester and committed to a fossil-free future.

And yet, today, the government approved drilling at Jackdaw, demonstrating that his government cares more about oil and gas company profits than the health, finances, and security of the British people.

Jackdaw is not the answer to any of our problems.

Jackdaw will not lower bills, as the energy secretary Miatta Fahnbulleh herself has admitted again this morning, and it will only create 27 new jobs.

On top of that, it will not contribute any significant amount of gas to our domestic stocks.

es, we will still use some gas as we make the transition to clean energy, but there’s more than enough extraction going on globally to meet that need.

Adding 2% of supply from our dwindling North Sea basin will not make one jot of difference to our energy security.

What it will do, though, is set this country on a dangerous trajectory – one where we ignore the physical limits of what our planet can take, to try and gain favour with business bosses who have never cared about whether the planet thrives or burns.

We have just lived through the driest summer on record; much of southern England is still in severe drought, and now we are facing a winter of devastating flooding.

Every day that real action is delayed, we increase the risks of a catastrophic tipping point from which we will never recover.

The domino effects of that tipping point will likely hurt those already in poverty, insecure housing or without community support the most.

Knowing this, the government is choosing today to commit to locking us into gas in the North Sea for longer.

“‘Hope’ is an easy thing for Burnham to call for – but without a genuine change to back it up, it is impossible to deliver”

Ministers have also admitted they are keen to approve the use of existing rigs to drill new wells – a dodge that helps them get around their manifesto pledge of no new licences.

The Labour government justified their decision today on the basis of gaining tax revenue to spend on the transition to low-carbon energy.

But why do they feel they need to say yes to fossil fuels to invest in renewables?

The money they are using to kickstart their new Energy Wealth Fund could just go straight to renewables, and be supplemented by the revenue from closing the tax loopholes and subsidies that existing oil and gas drilling receives.

At the same time, to actually lower bills for the long term, we need to be scaling up cheaper home-grown renewables, rolling out a fully-funded national home insulation programme and ending rampant profiteering by energy companies

It is also critical that we are fully funding a package of support to future-proof jobs in the energy sector, so that workers in oil and gas can transition to good-quality green jobs.

This climate vandalism has to stop now.

The approval of the Rosebank Oil field still hangs in the balance.

This will be another defining test of this government, and we all need them not to fail it. The answer is No To Rosebank.

‘Hope’ is an easy thing for Burnham to call for – but without a genuine change to back it up, it is impossible to deliver.

Instead of climate-wrecking new oil and gas, this government should be laser-focused on making life’s essentials affordable, taxing extreme wealth and profits, and investing in our long-term resilience.

Anything else fails workers and bill payers right now – along with the next generation.

Carla Denyer is the MP for Bristol Central and former co-leader of the Green Party.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Share Button

Opinion: For Men, There Is No Such Thing As An ‘Edgy’ Misogynistic Joke

Content note: this article contains mentions of assault and rape

Earlier this month, comedian Shane Gillis used some of his precious time on millions-of-viewers-strong Saturday Night Live to blurt out a controversial line. In the (coveted) opening monologue, he said that “women just dress like whores [in the gym] now”.

Locating the punchline here proved challenging. Maybe it was just the toddler thrill of saying a naughty word? Though it’s hard to believe that a man with Shane’s history has such a low shock threshold.

More likely, the alleged “joke” was supposed to lie in the controversy of the comment itself. He is a man saying something dismissive and sexist about women, but, like, he probably knows that’s wrong, and that, uhh, says something, right? And isn’t it so… edgy?

Shane Gillis

via Associated Press

Shane Gillis

Vittorio Angelone also made a reference to Rebecca Goodwin and rape in a 2025 Have A Word podcast episode, which has since resurfaced on social media. In the “roast”, which did not involve Goodwin, he said of comedian Freddy Quinne: “If you’re here, who’s raping Rebecca Goodwin?

“That’s a joke. Of course it’s her dad”.

Goodwin has responded to the comment on social media, creating both TikToks and Instagram Stories about the issue. “As most of you know, I am currently going through a rape trial at the minute. It is active; it is in court,” she said in an emotional video.

“It’s not even funny, and he’s not funny. I wasn’t asked; people sat there laughing at this joke were people I saw as genuine friends, and none of them have reached out to ask if I’m okay.”

Vittorio has since apologised on social media and claims he has spoken to Rebecca directly. “At the very least I should have run the joke past the person mentioned and then still not told it because it isn’t funny”, his Instagram post reads.

Vittorio, who is from Belfast – one of the most dangerous places in Europe for women – has previously described himself as “pretty left-leaning”. But according to his social media apology, his need for “validation” overrode his “own standards and morals”.

Among female fans, “disappointed but not shocked” seems a not-uncommon response. And while it might feel different in kind to Gillis’ offensive-as-standard fare, it is not in cause.

That’s because Vittorio, however briefly, trod a path so well-worn that its sole-shined surface has eroded into a slippery slide. Its decline often sends ever-accelerating male comics hurtling towards success.

Writing for The Independent, Oliva Petter said that for young, male comedians, especially those with strong internet presences, ’70s-style misogyny is the norm. Matt Rife reportedly made $50 million (£37,370,450) from Netflix specials and other projects in 2025, two years after his special included the line: “if she could cook, she wouldn’t have that black eye”.

Louis CK, who admitted sexual misconduct claims made about him were true in 2017, returned to Netflix with the special Ridiculous in 2026.

Anyone who’s hung around a comedy club for long enough knows this is a natural extension of stand-up culture. Comedian Stevie Martin has claimed that a club promoter “paid” male comics with the phone numbers of female stand-ups, for instance.

The jokes themselves do not transgress but reaffirm and strengthen sexism, which is a mainstream societal norm in every country across the world. Studies have shown that “men’s enjoyment of sexist jokes is positively correlated to their self-reported rape proclivity”, that these “jokes” give already-prejudiced men a “cloak” in which to cover their uncorrected biases, and that they make us less likely to give women resources.

Louis C.K.

via Associated Press

Louis C.K.

In other words, these are mainstream jokes about mainstream biases that have all-too-common harms on a globally subjugated group. It is an established and frankly hack-y way to make money, and being misogynistic rarely seems to place male comics in any long-standing personal or financial risk.

I don’t think these jokes are, or could ever be, transgressive for the same reason I don’t think a landlord evicting their tenant to sell an overpriced flat is a quirky prank. Such is the cruel banality of greed.

Vittorio does seem to acknowledge this somewhat in his apology, in which he openly admitted he made his “pathetic joke” to appease and impress. Gillis seems less troubled by his choices.

But in some ways, it doesn’t matter. We will see more of these – lots more. We’ll get cruel, sexist “jokes” from outright shock jockeys. We’ll see “clever social commentary!” gags from “woke”-identifying men who think their assault jokes are transgressive.

And we’ll see men who probably know better succumb to the sexism pervasive at every level of comedy, causing an outsize amount of harm from what they may see as a blip in judgment, but what is ultimately a tempting and correct assessment of “what sells”.

Until something huge shifts in either comedy or society more broadly, jokes like these will continue to be the most depressingly standard material around.

Share Button

ADHD Medication Could Slash Death Risk, Huge Study Finds

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is often linked to symptoms like fidgeting and having trouble focusing. But in one study, it was also associated with a greater risk of 34 of 35 physical health conditions – including alcohol-related liver disease, sleep disorders, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

And according to a new review published in JAMA Network Open, ADHD seems connected to a greater risk of early death, too.

However, medication appears to decrease this likelihood.

The review involved 19 studies and millions of participants

Researchers looked at data from over 15.9 million participants across 19 studies in this review – an enormous sample size. Results from 12 of these studies were pooled together to estimate the risk of early mortality among those with ADHD.

Overall, stats in this sample suggested people with the condition faced a 70% higher-than-average risk of death in general. That figure rose to 90% for suicide hazard, and sat at 50% for unintentional or intentional injury fatalities.

So far, these findings were similar to those seen in another 2022 review.

However, the newer review suggested those with ADHD faced a 30% higher likelihood of dying from natural causes, too, which was not suggested in the former study. According to the 2026 authors, “this difference may reflect the inclusion of more recently published studies or differences in the studies and effect estimates included”.

No matter the cause of death, though, taking appropriate ADHD medication seemed to lower affected people’s risk “significantly”.

“This finding reinforces the importance of accessible diagnosis and treatment for ADHD across the lifespan,” the paper reads.

Why might appropriate medications lower risk of death among those with ADHD?

This study only found a link between ADHD medication use and a lower risk of death. But its authors pointed to previous research that showed appropriate ADHD medication use may reduce the risk of injury, mental health conditions, suicidal behaviour and death by suicide, and substance use disorders.

A separate study has suggested that among those with ADHD, the benefits of taking the right medication significantly outweigh the risks.

However, the researchers in the JAMA Network Open paper cautioned that only three of the studies they reviewed contributed to the finding about medication’s risk-reducing benefits. And confounding factors, like access to healthcare and socioeconomic status, might affect how easily people with ADHD can access medication, too.

The review concluded: “These results reinforce the importance of targeted intervention and access to diagnosis and treatment for ADHD individuals across the lifespan”.

Does this mean unmedicated ADHD will definitely lead to an early death?

No, said Dr Claudia Aymerich, a consultant psychiatrist at Berkeley Psychiatrists.

Speaking to HuffPost UK, the expert explained: “The review found that, across large groups of people, those with ADHD had a higher hazard of dying from any cause than those without it, at 71% higher.”

But that doesn’t mean everyone with ADHD is 71% more likely than every single person without it. “This is a relative measure comparing groups, not a prediction of an individual’s lifespan,” Dr Aymerich clarified.

ADHD can indeed affect things like attention, impulse control and planning, which may contribute to certain risks for some people, she note. But “mortality is influenced by many factors, including physical health, co-occurring mental health conditions and access to appropriate care.

“These findings should encourage improved recognition, treatment and support for people with ADHD, not lead to the assumption that everyone with the diagnosis will have a shorter life.”

The expert continued to say that she found the data about ADHD medication “encouraging”, as it showed a 25% lower hazard of death from any cause among people who needed it. But like the study’s researchers, she also stressed that this paper only found a link and not a cause.

“Medication can help many people manage ADHD symptoms, including inattention and impulsivity, although its effects vary between individuals. We cannot conclude from this review alone that medication directly reduces mortality or guarantee that it will protect someone from adverse outcomes,” she ended.

“What matters is ensuring people have access to timely assessment, appropriate treatment and ongoing support tailored to their needs. Anyone considering medication should discuss its potential benefits and risks with their prescribing clinician”.

Share Button

Christina Applegate Claims She’s ‘Back At Square One’ After MS Misdiagnosis

Christina Applegate has disclosed that she was misdiagnosed when she was told she had multiple sclerosis.

In 2021, the Emmy winner revealed that she had been diagnosed with the incurable chronic illness MS, which affects the brain and spinal cord, months earlier.

Earlier this week, Christina returned to her podcast MeSsy after a seven-month break due to ill health, where she shared that she’d recently been informed she doesn’t have multiple sclerosis.

“This may come as great news, but to me, I’m back at square one,” she admitted.

Christina explained she was “not happy at all” to hear of the misdiagnosis, despite her doctor’s “congratulations” when they broke the news to her.

“You don’t get misdiagnosed and then all of the sudden I’m better. I haven’t gotten better,” she told listeners.

“If anything, I’ve gotten worse in some ways. So I’m back at square one, that I don’t know what’s going on with me.”

She added that she still has “every single” symptom of MS, but pointed out there are “many things that mirror MS”.

Christina also pointed out that there is a “pretty damn high number of misdiagnoses” when it comes to MS, which the NHS website says can cause fatigue, issues with vision, numbness and tingling, “sexual problems” and issues with coordination and muscle cramps, spasms and stiffness, as well as problems relating to memory and concentration.

Christina Applegate in January 2020
Christina Applegate in January 2020

via Associated Press

The former Married With Children star said she was in a “state of shock”, calling the misdiagnosis a “mindfuck” and a “weird feeling” given that she had become something of a “poster child” for MS.

“I had a fucking reason as to why my day sucked every day. And now I don’t have a reason and it’s very unnerving and it’s really confusing for me,” she admitted.

Shortly after her initial MS diagnosis, Christina retired from acting to focus on her health, and claimed on the MeSsy podcast that her illness “stopped my life”.

Christina lamented: “I still have to use wheelchairs when I go to the doctor’s office. I can’t walk from the car to the room. I’m still in this.

“Nothing magical happened when she said, ‘You don’t have MS.’ Nothing magical happened.”

In the 1990s, Christina rose to fame as a cast member on the family sitcom Married With Children.

Her subsequent credits included Samantha Who?, Dead To Me and a recurring guest role on Friends as Jennifer Aniston’s on-screen sister, for which she won an Emmy.

She started MeSsy in 2024 as a way of speaking candidly about her health issues, which she also elaborated on in her 2026 memoir You With The Sad Eyes.

Share Button

Nigel Farage Booed By Reform UK Supporters After Humiliating Slip-Up On Stage

Nigel Farage was booed by Reform UK’s own supporters after forgetting where exactly he was today.

The party leader was trying to lay out his plan to “fix Britain in the first 100 days” of a hypothetical Reform government during a rally in Plymouth – when he accidentally said he was in Portsmouth instead.

In the middle of a long speech, surrounded by signs reading “live from Plymouth”, the Clacton MP said: “Yes I do want to talk about Brexit. Plymouth voted clearly and decisively for Brexit by a higher margin than the rest of the country.

“One of the things, one of the sensible beliefs we had was that we would get back control of our waters.

“There is a big fishing fleet here in Portsmouth…”

The crowd quickly erupted in boos as Farage rushed to correct himself.

He said: “Sorry, did I say – Plymouth! Plymouth, sorry. It’s very small in Portsmouth!”

While both are port cities on the UK’s southern coast who voted Leave in the EU referendum, they are approximately 160 miles apart.

Reform UK’s Treasury spokesperson Robert Jenrick also made a blunder in the same press conference by asking the audience to stand up if they work – and only a handful did.

It comes as the right-wing party continues to struggle in the opinion polls, with YouGov putting Reform on 22% behind both the Conservatives and Labour.

Since winning the local elections in May, support for Reform has declined dramatically as Farage have become embroiled in a series of controversies.

He is still being investigated by the parliamentary standards commissioner for failing to declare a £5 million gift from crypto billionaire Christopher Harborne before he became an MP in 2024.

The Metropolitan Police are probing the outcome of an undercover sting by Channel 4 which appeared to show senior Reform officials trying to solicit an illegal donation from a wealthy American.

Meanwhile, a separate investigation by ITV published on Sunday showed Reform councillors and candidates making racist and sexist remarks.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Share Button