Liz Truss Says Far-Right Activist Tommy Robinson Has Been ‘Unfairly Demonised’

Liz Truss has claimed that far-right leader and anti-Islam activist Tommy Robinson has been “unfairly demonised”.

The former Conservative prime minister has been drifting further to the right ever since she was kicked out of Downing Street in 2022 – after just 49 days in office – for crashing the economy with her disastrous mini-Budget.

Truss, who also lost her seat in parliament in last July’s general election, has made her support for US president Donald Trump and his controversial former adviser Elon Musk clear since.

She was also accused of starting the “far-right bandwagon” over grooming gangs by Labour minister Jess Phillips.

Now she is speaking up in support of Robinson, who recently led a march of 150,000 people through London claiming to be in favour of free speech when the Metropolitan Police said 26 officers were injured.

Discussing Robinson’s past focus on the grooming gangs scandal, Truss said: “I think it is correct that Tommy Robinson drew attention to a problem and a heinous issue that has been brushed under the carpet by many people.”

Asked by Newsweek if thought Robinson had been “unfairly demonised”, she said: “Yes, I do.”

It comes after Truss already attracted criticism in 2024 for refusing to speak up when she chose not to speak up as former Trump adviser Steve Bannon called Robinson a “hero” while they were both on a podcast.

Former Tory foreign secretary Sajid Javid said at the time that “Liz should really know better”.

When asked by Newsweek if she might try to return to Westminster, she did not completely rule it out.

Truss said: “I’m getting my ideas and thoughts out there, because the problem with being a government minister for so long is you’re very constrained in what you can say.

“You’re very constrained in what you can do and think about and who you can talk to.

“And I think the problems are so big in Britain that we do need a revolution, and I want to work to achieve that.”

Truss is still currently part of the Conservative Party, despite previously clashing with Tory leader Kemi Badenoch, but this interview sparked calls for her to be removed as a member.

As former No.10 chief of staff Gavin Barwell wrote on X: “Rishi Sunak should have thrown Truss out of the Conservative Party when he became leader; Kemi Badenoch should definitely do so now.”

The Liberal Democrats’ deputy leader Daisy Cooper also said: “This should be the end of the road for Liz Truss in the Conservative Party.

“Kemi Badenoch needs to disavow this defence of a far-right racist and kick Truss out of her party for good.”

The Conservative Party has been approached for comment.

Share Button

Cabinet Minister Squirms As He Is Reminded How He Described Peter Mandelson After His Sacking

Minister Peter Kyle was put on the spot this morning over how he praised Peter Mandelson last week – even though Mandelson had just been sacked as US ambassador over his Jeffrey Epstein ties.

Keir Starmer fired his US ambassador more than a week ago, after it emerged that Mandelson had continued to support Epstein via email, even as he was facing child underage sex charges in 2008.

Mandelson’s friendship with the late convicted sex offender was already public knowledge when he was appointed less than a year ago.

And, speaking to Sky News last weekend – three days after Mandelson was fired – Kyle insisted that No.10 initially thought hiring the controversial figure as US ambassador was still worth the risk.

He said: “We knew that there were risks involved, but his talent led us to believe at the time that the risk was worth it.”

Kyle said while they “knew the relationship continued” after Epstein’s conviction, “the decision was taken in the national interest to try and use the specific talents that he had, which were singular and outstanding.”

Those remarks caused significant backlash with the public, especially as he said them after the depth of Mandelson’s links with Epstein post-arrest were revealed.

On ITV’s Good Morning Britain on Friday, presenter Rob Rinder asked Kyle if he still stood by that assessment.

Kyle just insisted that new evidence had come to light which was not available at the time of Mandelson’s hiring.

“That just doesn’t answer the question,” Rinder hit back. “Let me ask you in this way.”

He said it was well-known that Mandelson had previously stayed in the home of a convicted sex trafficker at the time of his appointment, adding: “At that point, anyone doing analysis, doing any kind of investigating [or vetting], would have said ‘Where are your emails?’”

Kyle said there was an independent vetting system in place that was operating in its usual way – before deflecting to talk about the impact of Donald Trump’s state visit.

But co-presenter Kate Garraway brought the conversation back to Mandelson, pointing out that Kyle has been criticised because he “continued to defend” him post-sacking.

“One minister told us at Good Morning Britain that you seem to be ‘tone-deaf’,” she added. “And other MPs have said that too. Is it going to have an impact on you?”

The cabinet minister replied: “Let me be really clear: I do not defend any of the actions that Peter Mandelson took in his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, absolutely not.

“What I am trying to do is show that we have been focused on delivering for people. As soon as new evidence came to light, why on earth would I ever defend what had come to light in those emails?”

“But it had?” Garraway pointed out. “It had come to light.”

Kyle stuttered before insisting: “The context of those emails was not known at the time of appointment.”

“No, but your defence was!” Garraway said.

Rinder cut in: “To close it off, the statement you made – that his ‘singular talents’ were worth the risk – you no longer think that?”

“What I said at the time of this coming out was explaining why he was appointed in the first place,” Kyle insisted.

“No one is appointed to being ambassador of a great country on behalf of our country, unless they have talents.”

He added that Mandelson should have been recalled as soon as new information came to light.

Share Button

Donald Trump Tells Reporters To ‘Fly Safely,’ Then Drops An Unsettling Confession

President Donald Trump offered well-wishes to reporters aboard Air Force One as he returned to the United States following his state visit to the United Kingdom.

But he then added a comment that critics said proved his self-centeredness.

“Thank you, everybody. Have a good flight. Fly safely,” Trump told the press pool after railing against late-night comedians who mock him, amid the uproar over ABC’s suspension of Jimmy Kimmel.

Then he added: “You know why I say that? Because I’m on the flight. Otherwise I wouldn’t care.”

Watch from the 17:30 mark here:

The quip, which Trump delivered with a grin, went viral on social media.

And while Trump’s supporters dismissed it as playful banter from the president, it immediately drew accusations of narcissism and more.

Earlier Thursday, a helicopter carrying Trump to London’s Stansted Airport made an unexpected landing after experiencing what the White House described as a “minor hydraulic issue.”

Share Button

Sadiq Khan Accuses Donald Trump Of ‘Fanning The Flames Of The Far-Right’

Sadiq Khan has reignited his feud against Donald Trump just as the Republican touched down in the UK, accusing the US president of “fanning the flames of the far-right”.

Writing in the Guardian, the London mayor said: “President Donald Trump and his coterie have perhaps done the most to fan the flames of divisive, far-right politics around the world in recent years.”

He pointed to Trump’s former adviser Elon Musk, who urged far-right protesters in London at the weekend to “fight back or die” in their supposed bid to protect free speech.

Khan said: “For far too long, our politicians and pundits have refused to condemn the rising tide of hatred in this country, instead choosing to dabble in dog-whistle politics and dangerous rhetoric themselves.”

Khan also said Trump’s habit of “scapegoating minorities, and illegally deporting US citizens, deploying the military to the streets of diverse cities” was not part of western values, but “straight out of the autocrat’s playbook”.

Khan also sent a clear message to Keir Starmer, saying: “For our leaders, silence is no longer enough.

“The time has come to stand up and say: this is not who we are.”

The London mayor did acknowledge that the UK has to maintain its special relationship with the States – but suggested Starmer makes it clear that “we reject the politics of fear and division”.

The politician also snuck in a sly reference to the record number of Americans who are making London their home since Trump’s return to the White House.

The London mayor has rowed with Trump in the past, accusing him of using xenophobia, racism and “otherness” as an electoral tactic during his first state visit back in 2019.

But this intervention will not have been welcomed by the prime minister, who has spent months carefully planning this unprecedented second state visit so as to most effectively woo Trump.

Starmer is trying desperately to keep a lid on all of the contentious issues which could cause the state visit to implode – including references to late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein – but it remains to be seen how much will actually go to plan.

Share Button

Trump Ignores Protests Against His UK Presence, Insisting Britain ‘Warms My Heart’

Donald Trump apparently overlooked all the protests against his state visit to the UK when he touched down in central London last night.

The US president told reporters on Air Force One that his whistle-stop tour was going to “a beautiful event” and urged them to “enjoy yourselves, OK?”

Initially greeted by home secretary Yvette Cooper at Stansted, he and first lady Melania Trump were then whisked off to the US ambassador’s property in Regent’s Park and told broadcasters: “A lot of things here, they warm my heart.”

“Relationships are great,” he said, adding that the King has been a “friend of mine for a long time, and everybody respects him, they love him”.

But there are plenty of reasons this could turn into a rather gloomy affair, which the government – and the Royal Family – will desperately be trying to keep out of sight of the mercurial president while they woo him with pomp and ceremony.

Trump is yet to mention the sudden sacking of the UK’s ambassador to the US Peter Mandelson last week, when new details about his relationship with late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein were revealed.

To make matters worse, Trump himself has been fighting off criticisms over his own friendship with Epstein from his own MAGA fanbase in recent months.

And coming to Britain is evidently not the best way for him to escape the scandal: four protesters were arrested for projecting a photo of Trump and Epstein onto the wall of Windsor Castle last night.

Climate demonstrators also interrupted a dinner for Republicans in Windsor last night, challenging Trump’s famous “drill baby drill” mentality.

Holding banners which read, “oil money kills”, and beating drums, they shouted: “How many will you kill if you drill, baby, drill?”

According to The Independent, male guests appeared to forcibly remove the protesters.

Another protest, organised by the Stop Trump Coalition, is expected to gather at 2pm today, and start a 5pm rally in Parliament Square.

Around 1,600 police officers have been deployed to keep an eye on the demonstrations.

Still, Starmer will be hoping he can distract the president with flashy shows of grandeur with this “unprecedented” state visit.

Trump will be met by the Prince and Princess of Wales on Wednesday morning in Windsor, before being welcomed to the castle by King Charles and Queen Camilla.

The Palace is also set to unveil the largest military ceremony ever organised for a state visit in living memory, with a joint RAF and US air Force flypast and a Red Arrows demonstration.

While Trump is here for a good time, Starmer will be trying to get some politics done – and the government already announced a “tech prosperity deal” last night, which will be revealed in its entirety on Thursday when the leaders meet at Chequers.

Pressure is on Starmer to reduce US tariffs on steel and aluminium, too, but that plan seems to have been put on the backburner for now.

Share Button

7 Contentious Issues To Keep An Eye On During Trump’s State Visit

Keir Starmer thought he had secured a royal flush when he offered Donald Trump an “unprecedented” invitation for a second state visit earlier this year.

Now the big occasion has officially rolled around and the timing couldn’t be worse for the prime minister.

Any visit from the divisive Republican, who is pretty unpopular in the UK, presents a rather tense moment for the British politicians who have to host him.

But Starmer’s most unpredictable ally is now coming to town just as Downing Street is beset by problems coming from all sides.

Here’s a look at some of the issues most likely to trip up the prime minister during Trump’s hurried 48-hour stay.

1. Relations with Epstein

Trump has been trying desperately to dampen down questions around his past links to the late convicted sex offender over in the US, but fresh revelations continue to revive questions around their friendship and have made it across the pond.

A political campaign group called Everyone Hates Elon unveiled a huge picture of Trump and Epstein outside of Windsor Castle on Monday, ahead of his visit.

Epstein’s ongoing legacy has sent waves across the UK in recent days too.

Starmer sacked his US ambassador, Labour grandee Lord Peter Mandelson, last week.

It came after newly-released emails from 2008 revealed Mandelson had called for Epstein’s 18-month prison sentence for soliciting a child for prostitution to be challenged.

Starmer said: “Had I know then what I know now, I’d have never appointed him.”

Trump, who had a strong bond with Mandelson, was allegedly displeased Starmer did not inform him of the ambassador’s sacking personally.

Both men are likely to face very difficult questions about the issue during their joint press conference on Thursday.

2. Starmer’s domestic struggles

Trump is known for seeing himself as a “winner”, and is keen to surround himself with other supposed victors – including Starmer, who won the general election on a landslide – even if they don’t align politically.

But just over a year later, the PM is now facing repeated questions about his future in the role – could Trump subsequently be about to cool on Starmer?

After 12 months of unpopular policies like cuts to welfare and international aid, the prime minister tried to turn over a new page on September 1, promising a period of “delivery, delivery, delivery”.

However, the scandal around Angela Rayner’s second property and her subsequent resignation, the sacking of Mandelson and the abrupt departure from Starmer’s director of political strategy Paul Ovenden over resurfaced messages about Diane Abbott mean the PM looking especially weak right now.

Even his own MPs are questioning whether he will last in the post until Christmas.

3. Anti-Trump protests

Those opposed to the US president are hoping to put together an even bigger demonstration against him after the Tommy Robinson-led far-right march at the weekend.

They are set to gather outside Windsor Castle from 5.30pm today, although Trump will not be visiting the royal residence until Wednesday morning – but protesters are hope he sees it on the media.

Meanwhile, Lib Dem leader Ed Davey will show his own frustration at Trump’s appearance by boycotting the state banquet tomorrow.

Similarly, Green Party MP Ellie Chowns has filed an Early Day Motion (EDM) saying Trump does not “deserve the honour of a second UK state visit”, due to the Epstein scandal.

She also criticised the use of US F-35 military jets in the flypast with the Red Arrows during the visit, as the planes are used in Israel on its war against Gaza.

She said: “State visits are honours; Trump doesn’t deserve one.”

Her motion was supported by seven other MPs including Jeremy Corbyn.

Starmer has timed the visit so it is during parliamentary recess, so MPs are not able to show their potential disdain for the president face-to-face – but Trump is known to be a keen newsreader, and could soon find out about the resistance to his presence here.

4. Question marks over free speech

The assassination of right-wing commentator and pro-MAGA campaigner Charlie Kirk last week has energised the international debate around the line between free speech and hate speechincluding by the Trump administration.

As the far-right rally at the weekend, known as the “Unite the Kingdom” march, demonstrated, there’s a growing body of people who claim free speech is under threat in the UK.

Former Trump adviser Elon Musk even appeared via video link to tell the crowds that “violence is coming” to the UK and to call for a “change of government in Britain”.

Even though – as cabinet ministers noted – the rally itself was proof that free speech is alive and well in the UK, there are fears Trump could revive this debate during his stay.

Demonstrators carry England and Union Jack flags during a Tommy Robinson-led Unite the Kingdom march and rally in London, Saturday Sept. 13, 2025.
Demonstrators carry England and Union Jack flags during a Tommy Robinson-led Unite the Kingdom march and rally in London, Saturday Sept. 13, 2025.

via Associated Press

5. Ongoing pressure over Ukraine

Away from the grandeur of the state visit, Starmer also wants to make some progress on stopping Russia’s war in Ukraine – with Trump’s help.

While the US president has repeatedly sided with Vladimir Putin in his quest to end the conflict, his frustration over Moscow’s refusal to come to the negotiating table seems to pushing him to finally align with his European allies.

Trump finally admitted that Russia was the aggressor in the war over the weekend and said he was willing to impose secondary sanctions on Moscow.

However, he claimed he would only do that if other Nato nations completely weaned its off Russia’s cheap fossil fuel exports.

Before the war, the EU got around 45% of its natural gas from Russia. That is expected to fall to around 13%, but that might not be far enough, according to Trump.

In what he called a letter to Nato allies, he said: “The purchase of Russian oil, by some, has been shocking! It greatly weakens your negotiating position, and bargaining power, over Russia.”

Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy has also demanded a “clear position” from Trump on ending the war, adding: “I very much hope he [Starmer] will be able to have a very specific discussion on the security guarantees of the US for Ukraine.”

6. Splits over the Middle East

The US secretary of state Marco Rubio is clearly not a fan of Labour’s plans to recognise a Palestinian state later this month during the UN’s General Assembly.

During a visit to Israel, he backed Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and said the UK’s move would have “no impact whatsoever” on moving towards a two-state solution, and instead just “embolden Hamas.”

He claimed the UK, along with France, Canada, Australia and Belgium, were also doing this solely because of their domestic problems.

7. Trade and the economy

While Starmer did secure the first tariff deal with Trump earlier this year after his so-going “liberation day”, Britain still wants to get the US president’s ongoing penalties on steel and aluminium trade lifted.

But there’s allegedly little sign of a meeting between chancellor Rachel Reeves and her US counterpart Scott Bessent on that topic during this state visit.

Tech and energy deals are also expected to be announced during Trump’s trip, which may help power new AI data centres.

Bagpipers play as President Donald Trump and Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer arrive at Trump International Golf Links, near Aberdeen, Scotland, Monday, July 28, 2025.
Bagpipers play as President Donald Trump and Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer arrive at Trump International Golf Links, near Aberdeen, Scotland, Monday, July 28, 2025.

via Associated Press

Starmer will have to do a delicate balancing act to make sure none of these sore spots threaten his strong relationship with the mercurial US president.

Share Button

Fact-Check: No, Immigration Is Not The Only Reason Driving Tests Are So Delayed Right Now

A surge in net migration has been widely blamed for causing a substantial backlog to driving tests in the UK right now – but that’s actually the full picture.

Officials from the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) told the transport secretary Heidi Alexander over the weekend that the unprecedented surge in immigration since 2021 is to blame for the backlog.

Learners are currently waiting up to six months to take a test, compared to just over six weeks in 2018-2019.

That’s far from the DVSA’s target wait time of seven weeks.

At the end of August, there were 644,398 future tests waiting to be booked, which is almost three times higher than the 219,786 total recorded in February 2020.

According to minutes released via a Freedom of Information request, the cabinet minister was urged to consider “immigration options” and “minimum learning periods” by transport officials.

But, as the government pointed out, there are multiple factors playing into the problems around booking a driving test at the moment.

Why is there a delay to driving tests?

Immigration is one of multiple factors pushing back driving tests.

According to the Department for Transport, an increase in the population of 17-year-olds in recent years is partially behind the backlog.

There’s also been a sharp rise in demand for provisional driving licences since 2019, a large component of which was driven by applicants born outside the UK.

However, for many this will be for identity purposes – not for taking a driving test.

A provisional driving licence is a valid form of ID and costs just £34 if applied for online, while a standard passport can cost £94.50.

There’s also the ongoing delays from the pandemic, as well as a shortage of examiners.

A government spokesperson also criticised the DVSA’s comments around immigration, saying: “This is incomplete analysis of the many causes of driving test wait times.

“This government has seen net migration fall by 300,000 since July last year.

“We inherited a broken driving test system where many learners found themselves stuck in a frustrating limbo, but the government has taken decisive action to address this and the DVSA has carried out over 20,000 more tests between June to August this year and the pass rate remains the highest it’s been since May 2021.”

Why is this important?

A surge of anti-immigration sentiment has swept across the UK in recent months, resulting in demonstrations outside asylum hotels and Saturday’s far-right march through London.

It’s widely believed that online misinformation is one of the main catalysts for such displays.

As data from the Office for National Statistics points out, net migration has halved since its record levels in 2023, falling to 431,000 in the year ending December 2024.

But, concerns over immigration are at the highest outside of 2015, with 49% of the British public saying immigration is an important issue facing the UK today.

Share Button

Cabinet Minister Heaps Praise On ‘Outstanding’ Peter Mandelson Despite Sacking Over Epstein Row

A cabinet minister has described Peter Mandelson as “outstanding” despite him being sacked over his close links with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

Peter Kyle, an ally of the former UK ambassador to Washington, also defended Keir Starmer’s decision to give him the job in the first place.

Mandelson was sacked on Thursday morning following the publication of emails in which he told Epstein “your friends stay with you and love you” even as he was facing child underage sex charges in 2008.

On Sky News this morning, business secretary Kyle admitted No.10 knew Mandelson and Epstein had “a strong relationship” before Starmer made him ambassador in February.

He said: “We knew that there were risks involved, but his talent led us to believe at the time that the risk was worth it.”

Presenter Trevor Phillips asked him: “The prime minister interrogated Lord Mandelson about the relationship with Epstein himself. This is one of the country’s leading barristers. If he couldn’t have actually got the information from Peter Mandelson before the appointment, who could? Who failed here?”

Kyle said: “There was a lot of information publicly, we knew there was a relationship, we knew the relationship continued after he had been convicted.

“The decision was taken in the national interest to try and use the specific talents that he had, which were singular and outstanding.”

Bizarrely, the business secretary went on to claim that “we only knew what the media knew” about Mandelson’s links to Epstein, despite the Labour peer having to go through so-called “deep vetting” before getting the job.

Share Button

Trump Has Admitted He’s ‘Very Unhappy’ With Israel’s Strikes On Doha. Here’s Why That Matters

Donald Trump is clearly not happy with Israel after it chose to launch missile strikes into Qatar.

While Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he was trying to hit Hamas militants in the Qatari capital of Doha, striking a country which has act as a mediator in the Middle East has sent shockwaves around the world.

To make matters even worse, it appears Netanyahu pushed ahead with the attack without giving the US – or Qatar – significant advance notice.

Israel’s international alliances have already been put under intense strain by its war on Gaza – only the Trump administration has consistently stood by Netanyahu.

But could Israel’s surprise attack on Doha change all that?

Here’s what we know – and why it matters.

What happened between Israel and Qatar?

Israel launched 10 missile strikes at the Hamas headquarters in Qatar – where the militants have been offered immunity – on Tuesday night.

Several key figures within the militant group had gathered to discuss Trump’s latest peace plan for Gaza.

Hamas claimed its leader had survived the attack, although his son and four others were killed along with a member of the Qatari security forces.

If this is true, the strike could turn out to be a huge miscalculation for Netanyahu, considering the international reaction and the knock-on impact for peace talks.

The UK’s prime minister Keir Starmer said the attacks “violate Qatar’s sovereignty and risk further escalation across the region”, while French president Emmanuel Macron said the strikes were “unacceptable”.

The UN’s secretary general Antonio Guterres also echoed their concerns, saying: “I condemn this flagrant violation of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Qatar. All parties must work towards achieving a permanent ceasefire, not destroying it.”

Smoke billowing after explosions in Qatar's capital Doha on September 9, 2025.
Smoke billowing after explosions in Qatar’s capital Doha on September 9, 2025.

JACQUELINE PENNEY via AFPTV/AFP via Getty Images

Qatar’s prime minister, Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thanil, also alleged Israel had used missiles in the attack which air defence systems could not detect.

He claimed Israel’s “treacherous attack” had sabotaged ceasefire efforts for Gaza, that mediation efforts were “part of Qatari identity”, and that a legal team was considering his country’s response to the attack.

But Netanyahu has so far doubled down. Speaking at the US embassy in Jerusalem, he said: “The days when terrorist leaders can enjoy immunity anywhere are over.”

He claimed that attack was “fully justified” because it targeted the senior leaders who organised Hamas’s raid on Israeli soil on October 7, 2023.

Other officials described the strike as a response to the Hamas attack on Jerusalem bus stop on Monday where six Israelis were killed.

However, Netanyahu did also insist that Israel had acted on its own, saying: “Israel initiated it, Israel conducted it, and Israel takes full responsibility.”

The strike comes after the chief of staff of the Israeli military Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir said Hamas leadership would be targeted across “the entire Middle East” with “no place to hide from us”.

What did the US say about Netanyahu’s latest attack?

The US is allied with Qatar, and even has a huge airbase stationed in the country.

Trump’s press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the attack on the soil of a close ally “does not advance Israel or America’s goals”.

She said the US president had been alerted to the strike by the US military, not Israel, and that Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff then notified the Qataris – only it was too late.

Trump “feels very badly” about the strikes, according to Leavitt, and “made his thoughts and concerns about this very clear” when he later spoke to Netanyahu.

The US president himself later told reporters that he was “very unhappy about the way that went down” and that he would offer a full statement on Wednesday.

What does this all mean?

Israel’s strikes pour cold water on the US’s ongoing attempts to end the war in Gaza.

Trump had been championing a US peace proposal for Israel and Hamas which would include the release of all Israeli hostages in exchange for an unspecified number of Palestinian prisoners.

But his plan did not include a permanent end to the war – a condition Hamas has demanded, but Israel has declined.

This new attack on Qatari soil suggests Netanyahu is clearly no longer willing to wait for America’s backing – and evidently giving up with the talks.

The decision to act without Trump’s stamp of approval also makes the US president look weak and flies in the face of Trump’s deal-making skills, something he has boasted about for years.

Displaced Palestinians fleeing northern Gaza carry their belongings along the coastal road toward southern Gaza, Tuesday, Sept. 9, 2025, after the Israeli army issued evacuation orders from Gaza City.
Displaced Palestinians fleeing northern Gaza carry their belongings along the coastal road toward southern Gaza, Tuesday, Sept. 9, 2025, after the Israeli army issued evacuation orders from Gaza City.

via Associated Press

This will all really rile a man so keen to secure the Nobel Peace Prize, especially as he has stood by Netanyahu’s side consistently while other allies in the west have started to question the catastrophic effects of Israel’s actions in the Middle East.

The BBC’s international editor Jeremy Bowen even suggested Trump has been “played” by Netanyahu.

Israel’s strikes could provoke further tensions in the Middle East too, particularly between Iran and Israel who have been holding a ceasefire since late June.

Iran’s foreign ministry said the attack was a “blatant violation of international law” and an “infringement upon the national sovereignty of Qatar and the Palestinian negotiators”.

It also stokes wider fears that Israel intends to continue a campaign of “score settling” for the October 7 raid – especially as the Qatari PM has said his country “reserves the right” to respond.

One thing is for sure: this is precisely the opposite of what Trump was hoping for.

Share Button

Anthony Bourdain’s Hilariously Brutal Take On Trump Is Reminding People How Much They Miss Him

Sure, most chefs know how to roast and skewer — but the late Anthony Bourdain could do all that with just his words.

The food author and TV personality, who died in 2018, was beloved for his cutting language. That’s precisely why a video of Bourdain using his sharp tongue against Donald Trump has recently resurfaced across multiple social media platforms.

A clip from a 2017 interview with the CBC shows the Kitchen Confidential author being asked if he’d ever share a meal with Trump.

It should be noted that in Bourdain’s popular food shows, No Reservations and Parts Unknown, he would travel to places around the world and share culturally authentic meals with locals.

“I’m open to sitting down with anyone who’s nice to me,” Bourdain began to explain. “I’ve sat down with everyone from Ted Nugent, the former chief of counterintelligence for the KGB, Hezbollah – people who I disagree with on many, if not every, fundamental issue.”

But in response to the CBC’s question about dining with Trump, Bourdain responded with an emphatic “no”.

“I just find him personally objectionable,” the chef explained. “I don’t think he likes food.

“And from people I know who have had to endure dinner with him, if you enjoy sitting there listening to him talk about himself, you know, great. God bless you.”

“He only eats steak well done, and if he knows how to use chopsticks, much less is able to grasp them with those tiny little nubbins, I’d be shocked,” Bourdain added.

Anthony Bourdain eats a carne asada taco from a food truck in Oakland, California, during an episode of No Reservations in 2007.
Anthony Bourdain eats a carne asada taco from a food truck in Oakland, California, during an episode of No Reservations in 2007.

MediaNews Group/Contra Costa Times via Getty Images via Getty Images

When the clip made its way to Instagram and X, users found Bourdain’s take refreshing – and instantly missed the chef.

“America could really use some Anthony Bourdain perspective and wisdom right about now,” one Instagram user said.

“Anthony Bourdain was curious and compassionate,” another Instagram user wrote. “And had an appreciation for great food, music, stories, culture, history and all that made life colourful. They do not share the same values, and this president wouldn’t deserve to share a table with Bourdain. RIP.”

“We could use his voice and humanity right about now. RIP AB,” another IG user said.

Over on X, many users felt the same way.

“Anthony Bourdain has always been a real one,” an X user said. “From his support for Palestine, to hating Trump, to just being a genuine person who wants to share food with people. I hate that he’s gone.”

“Miss this man. Society got worse and worse since he departed,” another X user echoed.

This was by no means the only time Bourdain spoke out about the US leader.

When Trump was running for office in 2015, Bourdain was asked what he thought about his campaign promise to build a border wall between the US and Mexico (that Trump infamously claimed Mexico would pay for) and to deport all the undocumented immigrants in the United States.

Bourdain replied that if that happened, “every restaurant in America would shut down”.

He went on to say that as a country of immigrants, we should show recent transplants more respect.

“For the people that have been living here and were so much a part of our lives, and have done nothing but do their best to achieve the American dream … there should be an easy path to legality,” Bourdain said.

Share Button