I Tried Mary Berry’s 15-Minute Lemon Curd Recipe, And I’ve Made 6 Jars Since

Ex-Great British Bake-Off host Mary Berry doesn’t just do sweet treats ― we love her sausage casserole and “Mexican lasagne” recipes for our midweek meals.

With that said, there’s a reason one of her (many) cookbooks is called The Baking Bible. When I want to make dessert, I turn to the Cordon Bleu-trained chef first.

This weekend, I craved a lemon meringue pie. So, I thought I’d give her pared-down recipe a go (I’d tried more complex recipes recently, like a pomegranate curd, and had been left with a runny disaster).

People, the pie never got made. The curd was so good, I simply slathered it on slices of bread and ate spoonfuls from the jar ― I re-made double the recipe again to stay in stock for the rest of the month.

How does Mary Berry make her lemon curd?

Her instructions are simple: whisk one egg per whole lemon zest and juice to 75g caster sugar and 56g butter together. Twice this calculation makes roughly a jar.

Then, keep whisking the lot over a gentle heat for seven to 10 minutes. Mary warns: “Do not allow the mixture to boil or it may split.”

For that reason, I made my first batch in a heatproof bowl over a saucepan of boiling water (like the one you’d use for melting chocolate).

I recommend this if, like me, you’re using thin, cheap saucepans; if you have a heavy-bottomed saucepan and really good temperature control on your hob, though, a saucepan should be fine.

Once the mixture has thickened enough to coat the back of a wooden spoon, you’re ready to spoon the curd into a sterilised jar ― it should thicken in a couple of hours, and the curd will last for a month or so in the fridge.

I loved that Mary uses the full zest and curd of all lemons. It makes a brilliantly tangy curd, and also means your kitchen smells amazing for hours.

I also think it made the curd less creamy, which I personally prefer.

Lemon curd cooking on left: jarred on the right

Amy Glover / HuffPost UK

Lemon curd cooking on left: jarred on the right

Any other tips?

Yes! Mary’s advice for sterilising the jars accidentally ensures they’re capable of taking in the hot curd without breaking or cracking, too.

“To sterilise jars, wash the jars in very hot, soapy water or put through the hot cycle of a dishwasher,” she writes.

Then, “place the jars onto a baking tray and slide into an oven preheated to 160C/325F/Gas 3 for 10–15 minutes”.

I spooned my curd into the jars while they were still warm(ish) from the oven. That way, you run far less risk of a shattering disaster.

Share Button

Canada’s Next Prime Minister Could Use Anti-Trump Sentiment To His Advantage In The Upcoming Election

Mark Carney will soon replace Justin Trudeau as Canada’s prime minister following his landslide victory in the governing Liberal Party’s election.

Carney, a former governor of the Bank of England and the Bank of Canada with no political experience — and no seat in the House of Commons — will take over the leadership of both his party and his country at a time of profound uncertainty prompted by US President Donald Trump’s adversarial stance toward his neighbor as a general election looms.

Carney is expected to call snap elections shortly after being sworn into office, and voter surveys show his party within fighting distance of his main opposition: the Conservative Party, led by Pierre Poilievre.

The Conservatives had long been considered the favourites to win the next election, which needs to be held by October. Trump’s talk of annexing Canada and his tariffs against the country have reshaped the race, overshadowing issues such as inflation and immigration that appeared to originally dominate voters’ minds.

“Trump has said he’s the most important person in Canadian politics right now,” said Nick Taylor-Vaisey, Politico Ottawa bureau chief. “I think everybody in Canada would acknowledge that.”

Mark Carney, the newly elected leader of the Liberal Party of Canada, addresses supporters in a victory speech Sunday after the official announcement of the 2025 Liberal Leadership race results at Rogers Centre in Ottawa, Ontario.
Mark Carney, the newly elected leader of the Liberal Party of Canada, addresses supporters in a victory speech Sunday after the official announcement of the 2025 Liberal Leadership race results at Rogers Centre in Ottawa, Ontario.

Artur Widak/NurPhoto via Getty Images

The latest polling average, updated by The Economist on Saturday, shows the Liberals trailing the Conservatives by 7 percentage points — a far slimmer margin compared to the 25-point difference between the two parties in late December, prior to Trudeau’s resignation announcement. Voters also appear to favor Carney over Poilievre, a recent poll found.

“Momentum is with [Carney] and his party,” The Economist said in a column on Monday. “Whether that will be enough to deliver victory — and to keep Mr Trump at bay— is yet to be seen.”

Carney, a former Goldman Sachs executive, sought to highlight his determination to protect his country from Trump in his first speech, pledging to maintain Canada’s tariffs on the US “until the Americans show us respect and and until they can join us in making credible and reliable commitments to free and fair trade.”

Last week, Trump imposed 25% tariffs on many Canadian goods before reversing course and postponing some of them while also threatening new tariffs on dairy and lumber.

“The Americans want our resources, our water, our land, our country,” Carney said. “Think about it: If they succeeded, they would destroy our way of life. In America, health care is a big business. In Canada, it is a right.”

“America is not Canada, and Canada never, ever will be part of America in any way, shape or form,” he continued.

Meanwhile, some voters appear to worry that Poilievre’s style is too similar to Trump’s — a perception that’s been amplified by ads run by the Liberals that show the Conservative Party leader echoing Trump’s rhetoric, including on “fake news.”

“At a time when Trump is toxic in Canada, that image is not helping Poilievre,” David McLaughlin, a former senior official in previous Conservative governments in Canada, told The Wall Street Journal.

Poilievre has recognized those concerns, speaking out forcefully against Trump, adjusting his party’s messaging and seeking to tie Carney to Trudeau, who has been widely unpopular despite the slight rebound in his approval rating in recent weeks.

Justin Trudeau, Canada's prime minister, speaks during a Liberal Party of Canada leadership announcement event Sunday in Ottawa, Ontario.
Justin Trudeau, Canada’s prime minister, speaks during a Liberal Party of Canada leadership announcement event Sunday in Ottawa, Ontario.

David Kawai/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Andrew Enns, the executive vice president of the Central Canada operations of Leger, a market research company, told Bloomberg that while the shift of the election’s focus on Trump poses a big challenge for Poilievre, Carney is still an unknown figure to most Canadians, meaning their perception of him could change as he assumes the top job.

“Carney’s had an impact, I’m not going to take that away from him, but the bigger change has been this whole Trump environment,” Enns said. “Tariffs have repositioned how Canadians are viewing the Canadian government now.”

Share Button

Lab-grown food could be sold in UK within two years

The Food Standards Agency (FSA) is looking at how it can speed up the approval process for lab-grown foods.

Share Button

Software bug at firm left NHS data ‘vulnerable to hackers’

The NHS is looking into claims that a software flaw at Medefer left patient data vulnerable.

Share Button

Clinical trial tests novel stem-cell treatment for Parkinson’s disease

A recently launched Phase 1 clinical trial at Mass General Brigham is examining the safety and feasibility of a groundbreaking treatment approach for Parkinson’s disease in which a patient’s stem cells are reprogrammed to replace dopamine cells in the brain damaged by the disease. The first-of-its-kind trial of an autologous stem cell transplant, based on research and technologies invented and validated preclinically at McLean Hospital’s Neuroregeneration Research Institute (NRI), has enrolled and treated three patients at Brigham and Women’s Hospital.

A total of six participants will be included in the Phase 1 trial that will track the patients for 12 months and beyond to determine the safety of the procedure and monitor for any improvements in Parkinson’s disease. Following the first 6 patients transplanted in the Phase 1 study, the researchers hope to expand and recruit more patients as part of Phase 2A study.

This novel therapeutic approach for treating Parkinson’s disease incorporates the use of stem cells derived from a patient’s own blood that had been converted into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). These cells are then reprogrammed to turn into specific midbrain dopaminergic neurons ready for transplantation. The autologous transplantation approach of using a person’s own cells circumvents the requirement for immunosuppressive treatments, which are necessary when cells from other donors are used.

Cell replacement for Parkinson’s disease replaces the dopamine neurons lost to degeneration and can restore dopaminergic function in the brain, providing a completely new treatment modality compared to the currently available treatments. The NRI’s founding director, Ole Isacson, Dr Med Sci, who is also a professor of neurology (neuroscience) at Harvard Medical School and Mass General Brigham, has pioneered work in cell therapy for Parkinson’s disease over the past 30 years and laid the foundation for this clinical trial.

“Seeing this transformational new patient cell-based replacement of their own dopamine neurons come to fruition — from the very basic science breakthroughs in our lab to be completely translated into a clinical application for patient’s suffering from Parkinson’s disease — is very gratifying,” said Isacson. “We believe this approach may open up a new treatment paradigm and lead to the development of many additional cell therapies to restore damaged brain systems and replace degenerated brain cells in other diseases.”

Under Isacson’s leadership, the NRI at McLean has developed and patented autologous cell-based restoration in Parkinson’s disease with a pioneering preclinical publication in 2002 using stem cells and the first preclinical demonstration of effective human iPS cell-derived dopamine neuron use in 2010. In 2015, the NRI team, led by Isacson and Penny Hallett, PhD, co-director of the NRI at McLean and associate professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, provided the first evidence of long-term safety and benefits of autologous stem cell therapy in a highly relevant Parkinson’s disease non-human primate animal model.

The NRI received official authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on August 23, 2023, approving its Investigational New Drug (IND) application for a phase 1 clinical trial to test this unique, autologous dopamine neuron cell therapy.

Following this FDA approval for the phase 1 clinical trial, the NRI’s innovative preclinical work was translated into the clinic with the first patient treated on September 9, 2024. This collaboration includes NRI investigators James Schumacher, MD, and Oliver Cooper, PhD, and colleagues in the Neurology (Michael Hayes, MD) and Neurosurgery (John Rolston, MD, PhD, principal investigator of the Phase 1 trial) Departments at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Isacson is not directly involved in the clinical trial because he is the innovator patent holder of the technology and also a co-founder of Oryon Cell Therapies, which has the license to this technology. The trial is directed by Hallett and colleagues within the Mass General Brigham healthcare system and its Harvard Medical School-affiliated institutions.

“It is extraordinary to witness that investigators at our institution can bring new treatments to patients through the entire process of laboratory “bench to bedside,” and it inspires many investigators to similarly pursue their scientific and medical insights to reach patients in need,” said Kerry Ressler MD, PhD, chief scientific officer at McLean Hospital.

The Phase 1 open-label clinical trial will be the first such trial to test blood-derived autologous iPSC-derived dopamine neurons in patients with Parkinson’s disease and is funded by the National Institute of Health’s National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). The NINDS awarded the highly competitive Cooperative Research to Enable and Advance Translational Enterprises for Biologics (CREATE Bio) grant for this work in 2020.

People seeking more information in the trial can email: @bwh.harvard.edu” title=”mailto:neurosurgerycrc@bwh.harvard.edu”>neurosurgerycrc@bwh.harvard.edu

For More Information:

  • McLean Hospital Receives Coveted NIH Grant to Clinically Study Autologous Stem Cell Therapy for Parkinson’s Disease
  • Patient-derived stem cells could improve drug research for Parkinson’s

Funding: The study was supported by a NINDS CREATE Bio grant (U01NS109463).

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Disclosure:Isacson has co-founded a company (Oryon Cell Therapies) which has licensed the patents and know-how for developing autologous cell therapies for Parkinson’s disease. Isacson’s interests were reviewed and are managed by McLean Hospital and Mass General Brigham in accordance with their conflict of interest polices.

###

About Mass General Brigham

Mass General Brigham is an integrated academic health care system, uniting great minds to solve the hardest problems in medicine for our communities and the world. Mass General Brigham connects a full continuum of care across a system of academic medical centers, community and specialty hospitals, a health insurance plan, physician networks, community health centers, home care, and long-term care services. Mass General Brigham is a nonprofit organization committed to patient care, research, teaching, and service to the community. In addition, Mass General Brigham is one of the nation’s leading biomedical research organizations with several Harvard Medical School teaching hospitals. For more information, please visit massgeneralbrigham.org.

Share Button

Levels of select vitamins and minerals in pregnancy may be linked to lower midlife BP risk

Women with higher levels of essential minerals circulating in their blood during pregnancy, particularly copper and manganese, along with vitamin B12, had a lower risk of developing high blood pressure in middle age, about 20 years later, according to research presented at the American Heart Association’s Epidemiology and Prevention | Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health Scientific Sessions 2025. The meeting will be held in New Orleans, March 6-9, 2025, and offers the latest science on population-based health and wellness and implications for lifestyle. According to the study authors, it is the first to explore the associations of pregnancy metal levels with women’s midlife blood pressure and hypertension risk, and the full manuscript is simultaneously published today in the American Heart Association’s peer-reviewed journal Hypertension.

Manganese, selenium, magnesium and copper are among the essential metals important for a healthy body because their anti-oxidation and anti-inflammatory properties may help protect against cardiovascular disease. Previous research has found that higher levels of manganese were associated with a lower risk of preeclampsia (high blood pressure during pregnancy). However, it is not known whether higher levels of essential metals during pregnancy may influence the risk of developing high blood pressure later in life. Additionally, chronic exposure to the non-essential metals lead, cadmium and arsenic is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, according to the Association’s 2023 scientific statement “Contaminant Metals as Cardiovascular Risk Factors.”

“People are constantly exposed to heavy metals and trace elements, and much research has shown that exposure to those metals and elements may have an impact on cardiovascular health, especially hypertension,” said lead study author Mingyu Zhang, Ph.D., M.H.S., an epidemiologist and instructor in medicine at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, both in Boston. “In our study, we wanted to examine how levels of essential metals and elements during pregnancy may affect blood pressure and hypertension risk in midlife.”

The researchers analyzed data from Project Viva, an ongoing, long-term study that began in 1999 of women and their children who live in eastern Massachusetts. Nearly 500 women enrolled in the study during early pregnancy, between 1999 and 2002. Researchers measured concentrations of non-essential metals (arsenic, barium, cadmium, cesium, mercury and lead), essential minerals (copper, magnesium, manganese, selenium and zinc), folate and vitamin B12 in blood samples collected during study enrollment.

After nearly twenty years of follow-up, researchers conducted a “midlife” study visit between 2017 and 2021 with the same study participants, who were now at a median age of 51.2 years. Researchers measured blood pressure to assess potential associations of individual metals with blood pressure and high blood pressure risk. Participants were categorized as having high blood pressure if blood pressure measures were greater than 130/80 mm Hg or if participants confirmed taking anti-hypertensive medication. In addition, the potential collective effects of all eleven metals and two micronutrients on blood pressure were analyzed.

The study found:

  • After researchers adjusted for sociodemographic factors, as levels of copper and manganese doubled in the blood during pregnancy, the risk of high blood pressure in midlife was 25% and 20% lower, respectively.
  • As blood levels of vitamin B12 doubled during pregnancy, women had an average 3.64 mm Hg lower systolic blood pressure and 2.52 mm Hg lower diastolic blood pressure almost two decades later. About 95% of the study participants had vitamin B12 levels within the normal range, the researchers noted.
  • Blood levels of the mixture of copper, manganese, selenium and zinc were also associated with lower blood pressure in a relationship that increased with dose. Nonessential metals did not have a significant impact on blood pressure.

“Circulating levels of these metals and minerals in blood were measured, however, the sources of exposure, such as food or dietary supplements, were not quantified so these findings should not be interpreted as recommendations,” Zhang said. “Optimizing these essential metals, minerals and vitamins, particularly copper, manganese and vitamin B12, during pregnancy may offer protective benefits against hypertension in midlife, an especially critical time period for women’s future cardiovascular risk in later life.”

“More research including clinical trials is needed to determine the optimal dietary intake of these minerals and micronutrients,” he added. The researchers hope to ultimately identify women at high risk for developing high blood pressure later in life and intervene during pregnancy, either with enhanced nutrition or supplements.

Study details, background and design:

  • The analysis included 493 women enrolled in Project Viva, a prospective study examining the effects of environmental and lifestyle factors during pregnancy on the short and long-term health of women and their children.
  • Project Viva enrolled women in early pregnancy between 1999 and 2002. The women had a median age of 32.9 years at enrollment. Participants were followed for 18.1 years, through 2021.
  • 72% of participants self-identified as white women; 11% were self-identified as Black women; and 17% self-identified as Hispanic or Latina, Asian or Pacific Islander, American Indian or Alaskan Native, or selected “Other” race, more than one race or “do not know.”
  • Blood samples were collected at study enrollment and stored in freezers for subsequent analyses. The researchers accessed blood samples and analyzed them for this study in 2018. Folate and vitamin B12 were also measured in blood plasma samples during pregnancy.
  • Blood pressure was measured in study participants during a “midlife” (median age of 51 years) study visit between 2017 and 2021. During this visit, trained research assistants measured participants’ blood pressure up to five times, at one-minute intervals. Blood pressure measurements were then averaged.
  • The analyses were adjusted for maternal age at study enrollment, pre-pregnancy body mass index, race and ethnicity, education, household income, parity (the number of pregnancies carried to term), use of anti-hypertensive medication, DASH diet score in early pregnancy and multivitamin intake.

The study’s limitations include that it was an observational study, meaning other confounding factors that were not measured in the study may have affected the results; the researchers only included a subset of the original Project Viva participants; and there were demographic differences between participants included and excluded. In addition, the researchers did not have measurements for metal levels between delivery and midlife; and participants were predominantly white women who resided in Eastern Massachusetts, which may limit the generalizability of the study’s findings.

Share Button

Putin Seems To Ignore Trump Threat And Causes One Of 2025’s Deadliest Days For Civilians In Ukraine

Vladimir Putin appeared to ignore Donald Trump’s threat to impose sanctions on Russia on Friday and launched deadly attacks across Ukraine.

The US president told the Russian leader to stop “pounding” Ukraine or face serious sanctions last week, after weeks of not applying any pressure to Moscow.

However, the UN has since said Friday was one of the deadliest days for civilians this year after 21 people were killed in Ukraine.

A further 81 people were injured, 79 of whom were in territory controlled by Ukraine.

The UN also found casualty numbers in Ukraine overall for 2025 remain higher than they were in 2024.

The attacks unfolded even as Trump was telling reporters in the White House that Putin “holds all the cards” – and that Russia is “easier to deal with” than Ukraine on Friday.

It’s worth remembering that Russia invaded Ukraine in a land grab in 2022.

But, Trump said Kyiv has to “get on the ball and get the job done” when it comes to a peace agreement, adding: “I have to know that [Ukraine] want to settle – if they don’t want to settle, we’re out of there.

“They’re bombing the hell out of Ukraine… I’m finding it more difficult, frankly, to deal with Ukraine.”

And, despite the ongoing bombardments, Trump then said he thinks Putin wants peace, and “I think he’s doing what anyone else would do”.

He claimed: “I think both parties want to settle. I think we are going to get it settled.”

This also comes after Trump’s Ukraine envoy Keith Kellogg said Ukraine brought the US’s pause in intelligence sharing and military aid “on themselves.”

Speaking on Thursday, Kellogg said: “Very candidly, they brought it on themselves, the Ukrainians.

“I think the best way I can describe it is sort of like hitting a mule with a two-by-four across the nose. You got their attention, and it’s very significant, obviously, because of the support that we give.”

“We’re going to end this war, and this is one way to make sure you understand we’re serious about it.

“So is it hard, of course it is, but it’s not like they didn’t know this was coming. They got fair warning it was coming.”

Trump’s former national security adviser John Bolton told CNN on Friday that Putin is continuing his attacks on Ukraine because he knows the threat from Trump was “totally hollow”.

″[Trump] did it simply to show some kind of balance given the things he had said about Zelenskyy and Ukrainians,” Bolton said, alluding to the US president’s baseless attacks on the Ukrainian president.

Trump, as he aligns more closely with Moscow, has falsely called Volodymyr Zelenskyy a “dictator”, claimed he is ungrateful for the US’s support during the war and blamed Kyiv for starting the war.

Share Button

Charity’s wellness sessions take to the road

The iCan organisation’s van is offering support to “hard-to-reach” people in parts of Cumbria.

Share Button

Minister Dismisses Latvian President’s Call For Europe To Bring Back Conscription

A senior government minister dismissed the idea of bringing back conscription to the UK this morning.

Although is Europe looking to boost its security amid worries about the Ukraine crisis, Pat McFadden rejected the suggestion of introducing compulsory state service.

It comes after Latvia’s president Edgars Rinkevics told Sky News that his country has introduced conscription again, in case Vladimir Putin returns to seize more European land even after striking a peace deal in Ukraine.

He said: “If Russia is allowed to regroup, then the risks are rising.”

Rinkevics said that means Europe should therefore “increase its overall presence” to the east, especially as it is “quite weak” militarily right now.

He claimed other European nations should “absolutely” introduce the emergency measure.

However, speaking on Sky News’ Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips, cabinet office minister McFadden said: “We are not considering conscription, but of course we have announced a major increase in defence expenditure a couple of weeks ago.”

The government recently announced plans to boost defence spending from its current level of 2.3% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to 2.5% by 2027.

The move came after US president Donald Trump said Europe had to be more responsible for its own security and could no longer rely on the States to prop it up militarily.

McFadden continued: “We do have to recognise that the world has changed. The phrase ‘step up’ is used a lot. Europe does have to step up in terms of its own defence.

“President Trump isn’t actually the first president to say that, but he said it more loudly and with more force than his predecessors so, I think we have got to recognise that moment.”

He added that the shift seen in the global order in recent weeks means it is “important we don’t cling to old assumptions”.

The chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster added: “Other decisions may be needed in the future which respond to a new reality so we don’t find ourselves operating under the same assumptions as we used to in the past when the situation has changed.”

McFadden refused to offer any further details, saying a defence review published this spring would set out a “roadmap” about how the new cash injection would be spent.

But he noted: “One thing is for sure, you would not spend money today on the same things as you would 10 years ago.

“The experience of the three years of the war in Ukraine has shown just how fast the battlefield is changing in terms of cyber, drones, the use of intelligence.”

Conscription was introduced in Britain in 1916, during World War 1, and again in 1939, after declaring war against Germany.

Share Button

‘Recipe For Disaster’: Labour’s Plan To Cut Civil Service Slammed

Labour’s new plan to cut civil service jobs was torn apart this morning as union chiefs said it was a “recipe for disaster”.

Whitehall departments have increased by over 15,000 since the end of 2023, but, according to the government, working people have not seen tangible improvements.

In a plan set to be announced in the coming days, Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden is going to introduce “mutually agreed exits” so people who are underperforming are able to leave their jobs easily.

The highest paid civil servants will be dismissed if there’s no improvement within six months, and there will be a new pay-results system, while also increasing the use of digital systems.

But, the plan has been slated by unions and compared to “Trumpian” efforts to slim down the state in the US.

The general secretary of the Trades Union Congress Paul Nowak told Times Radio he is “disappointed” in this plan, and said cuts to the civil service are not what’s needed right now.

He said: “I think these are a set of proposals that look more about grabbing headlines rather than about a serious plan for reforming our public services.”

Nowak said to enact public sector reform, “you have to be serious about engaging the staff who are involved in delivering those services” otherwise it is a “recipe for disaster”.

He also took issue with the suggestion the civil service is not working effectively, saying: “It was a decade and a half of underinvestment in our public services. Now the number of civil services, civil servants has gone up.

“We have had Brexit in the last few years and we now do things in the UK, trade agreements for example that we didn’t do before.

“A whole range of things around veterinary standards for example that we didn’t have to do before.”

Prime minister Keir Starmer sparked backlash last year when he claimed “too many people in Whitehall are comfortable in tepid bath of managed decline,” and warned change was coming to the civil service.

Touching on the prime minister’s comment, Nowak said he did not agree “on the Trumpian language”.

He said: “I don’t think the language is always helpful when you try and paint those who are delivering public services often at the sharp end in difficult circumstances as somehow part of the problem.

“Now the civil service public service workforce is like any workforce there are some people who don’t pull their weight.

“To characterise the vast majority of people who are working hard day in day out as somehow the part of the problem and that’s what they do I think is unfair.”

Similarly, the general secretary of the FDA – the civil service union – Dave Penman told the same radio that the issue comes down to the constant changing of hands in government.

He said: “We’ve had six prime ministers, eight chancellors, 40 ministers in the Treasury departments, hundreds of different ministers because of the chaotic political leadership over the last 10 years.

“If you want to look at how you solve the problem with public services, look at the political chaos that we’ve had to deal with as well, not just simply headlines around sacking civil servants.

“We wouldn’t be in business if people weren’t sacked for poor performance in the civil service. ”

Penman said this new plan was all about “cheap headlines”.

“The idea that you can simply get more for less is rhetoric. It’s a headline that’s not reality. You have to demonstrate how you do that. Technology can play a role, AI can play a role, but how is it actually going to do that? That’s what ministers should be setting out rather than these cheap headlines,” he said.

Share Button