SPHERE’s stunning space images reveal where new planets are forming

Using the SPHERE instrument on ESO’s Very Large Telescope, astronomers have created an extraordinary set of images showing debris disks in a wide range of exoplanetary systems. These dusty structures reveal where small bodies orbit their stars and provide rare insights into the earliest stages of planetary development. Gaël Chauvin (Max Planck Institute for Astronomy), project scientist for SPHERE and co-author of the study, explains: “This data set is an astronomical treasure. It provides exceptional insights into the properties of debris disks, and allows for deductions of smaller bodies like asteroids and comets in these systems, which are impossible to observe directly.”

In our own solar system, once you look past the Sun, the planets, and dwarf planets such as Pluto, an enormous variety of smaller (“minor”) bodies comes into view. Scientists pay particular attention to objects ranging from about a kilometer to several hundred kilometers in size. Those that occasionally release gas and dust to form visible features like a tail are called comets, while those that do not show such activity are labeled asteroids.

These small bodies preserve clues to the solar system’s earliest days. During the long process in which tiny grains grew into planets, intermediate objects known as planetesimals formed. Asteroids and comets are remnants of that transitional phase, planetesimals that never developed into full-size planets. In this sense, they are (somewhat) altered traces of the same ingredients that once built Earth.

Searching for small bodies in exoplanetary systems

Astronomers have identified more than 6000 exoplanets (that is, planets orbiting stars other than the Sun), giving us a clearer picture of how planetary systems vary throughout the galaxy. Directly imaging these worlds is still extremely difficult. Fewer than 100 exoplanets have been photographed so far, and even the largest ones appear only as featureless points of light.

This challenge becomes even greater when searching for small bodies. As Dr. Julien Milli, astronomer at the University Grenoble Alpes and co-author of the study, notes: “Finding any direct clues about the small bodies in a distant planetary system from images seems downright impossible. The other indirect methods used to detect exoplanets are no help, either.”

Dust provides the key to detecting hidden planetesimals

The breakthrough comes not from the small bodies themselves, but from the dust created when they collide. Young planetary systems are especially active. Planetesimals frequently crash into each other, sometimes merging into larger bodies and sometimes fragmenting into smaller ones. These events release vast amounts of fresh dust.

The physics behind dust visibility is surprisingly intuitive. Breaking an object into many tiny pieces preserves its total volume, but dramatically increases its surface area. For example, if a one kilometer wide asteroid were crushed into dust grains just one micrometer across (a millionth of a meter), the overall surface area would increase by a factor of one billion. More surface area means far more light reflected from the star, which makes the dust easier to detect. By observing that dust, astronomers can infer details about the unseen small bodies producing it.

How debris disks evolve over time

Debris disks do not remain bright forever. As a young system matures, collisions become rarer. Dust can be pushed outward by radiation pressure from the central star, swept up by planets or planetesimals, or spiral inward and fall into the star.

Our solar system provides a late-stage example. After billions of years, two major planetesimal belts remain: the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter and the Kuiper belt beyond the giant planets. A population of smaller dust grains also persists, creating zodiacal dust. Under especially dark skies, sunlight scattered by this dust can be seen shortly after sunset or before sunrise as a faint glow called zodiacal light.

For observers studying our solar system from afar, these faint leftovers would be hard to detect. The new research, however, shows that similar dusty structures around younger systems should be visible for roughly the first 50 million years of a debris disk’s lifetime. Capturing these images is extremely challenging. The task has been compared to photographing a thin cloud of cigarette smoke beside a blinding stadium floodlight from several kilometers away. SPHERE, which began operating on one of ESO’s Very Large Telescopes (VLT) in spring 2014, was created specifically for such situations.

How SPHERE blocks starlight to reveal faint features

The fundamental idea behind SPHERE is familiar from everyday experience. If the Sun is shining directly into your eyes, you might raise a hand to shield the glare so you can see what lies around it. SPHERE uses a coronagraph to achieve the same effect when imaging exoplanets or debris disks. By inserting a small disk into the path of the star’s light, the instrument blocks most of the glare before the image is captured. This method only works if the optical system remains extremely stable and precise.

To maintain this stability, SPHERE relies on a highly advanced version of adaptive optics. Turbulence in Earth’s atmosphere distorts incoming starlight, and SPHERE continually monitors these distortions and corrects them in real time using a deformable mirror. An optional component can also isolate “polarized light,” which is characteristic of light reflected by dust rather than emitted directly from a star. This additional filtering enhances SPHERE’s ability to detect faint debris disks.

A major survey reveals 51 debris disks in sharp detail

The new study presents a unique set of debris disk images created by analyzing starlight scattered by tiny dust particles. “To obtain this collection, we processed data from observations of 161 nearby young stars whose infrared emission strongly indicates the presence of a debris disk,” says Natalia Engler (ETH Zurich), the lead author of the research. “The resulting images show 51 debris disks with a variety of properties — some smaller, some larger, some seen from the side and some nearly face-on — and a considerable diversity of disk structures. Four of the disks had never been imaged before.”

Working with such a large sample makes it possible to find broader patterns. The analysis revealed that more massive young stars tend to host more massive debris disks. Systems where dust is concentrated farther from the star also show a tendency toward more massive disks.

Rings, belts, and hints of unseen planets

One of the most compelling aspects of the SPHERE results is the wide range of structures inside the disks. Many show rings or band-like patterns, with material clustered at specific distances from the star. This arrangement resembles our own solar system, where small bodies gather in the asteroid belt (asteroids) and the Kuiper belt (comets).

These structures are thought to be shaped by planets, especially large ones that clear out paths as they orbit. Some of the planets responsible have already been detected. In other cases, sharp edges or asymmetries in the disks strongly suggest the presence of planets that have not yet been directly observed. Because of this, the SPHERE survey provides a valuable set of targets for upcoming facilities. Instruments on the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and the Extremely Large Telescope (ELT) under construction by ESO should be capable of directly imaging at least some of the planets that are sculpting these dusty rings and gaps.

Study authors and publication details

The results described here have been published as Natalia Engler et al., “Characterization of debris disks observed with SPHERE,” in the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics.

The MPIA researchers involved are Gaël Chauvin, Thomas Henning, Samantha Brown, Matthias Samland, and Markus Feldt, in collaboration with Natalia Engler (ETH Zürich), Julien Milli (CNRS, IPAG, Université Grenoble Alpes), Nicole Pawellek (University of Vienna), Johan Olofsson (ESO), Anne-Lise Maire (CNRS, IPAG, Université Grenoble Alpes), and others.

Share Button

The Job Market Is Tough, So Naturally People Are ‘Lily Padding’

You’re probably sick of hearing about it, but yes, the UK job market is tough right now.

Either you know it because you’re in the process of job hunting, or you’re scared to leave your old-and-unsatisfying job after hearing the horror stories from those applying for hundreds of roles, only to hear back from none.

And now it seems “lily padding” is the latest career trend to come out of this difficult working situation.

What is ‘lily padding’?

“Lily padding” is when you strategically climb the career ladder, focusing on building experience over seeking a higher salary. It’s about supercharging your employability, according to targetjobs.

People who “lily pad” look for temporary roles and use each one to springboard into the next, going for a similar field and role to boost their experience. Almost like becoming an expert at that specific job.

As Forbes puts it: “Rather than climbing rung by rung, they [“lily padders”] move laterally, diagonally, and sometimes across industries altogether, collecting skills and experiences with every leap.”

It’s no coincidence this comes at a time when the security of certain jobs is being questioned, thanks to the rise in popularity of artificial intelligence (AI).

The hope is that after a few career jumps, people could move into a longer term role and have a better chance of going for that higher salary and more senior job title, with a wealth of experience in their back pocket.

“Lily padding” might also suit those who are happy with their salary range and title, and aren’t looking to take on extra responsibility, but want to boost their CV.

The trend is particularly popular among Gen Z candidates, and it’s even helping them to avoid imposter syndrome, said targetjobs. Unlike job hopping, “lily padding” is more targeted and focused on skill-boosting over pay.

It might look like sidestepping from the outside, but this is often more of a planned career game, and while people who sidestep might stay in a job for a number of years, “lily padders” jump more frequently and prioritise temp roles.

While job hopping is usually spurred on by being unhappy in a workplace, “lily padding” is spurred on by wanting to see growth in confidence and skillset, said the job experts.

But it’s important to not play it safe like this for too long – once you’ve mastered the skills you need, move upwards, otherwise staying at the same level might become a bit too comfortable and not that challenging.

Until then, “lily pad” away.

Share Button

Reform’s Zia Yusuf Sparks Strong Response After Clash With BBC Question Time Audience Member

Reform’s head of policy Zia Yusuf startled BBC Question Time audience members on Thursday with his curt response to a question.

During an immigration special, one member of the crowd took issue with the anti-immigration party’s claim that there are enough people in the UK to “not need foreign doctors”.

The man in the audience said: “I joined the NHS as a student in 1974. We’ve been totally reliant on doctors from Asia initially, and the care sector is totally dependent on care workers from abroad, despite nine million people not being in work.”

He said population growth and a shortage of funds for hospitals has gone down, telling Yusuf: “So you’re conflating lots of different things to make your argument.”

He pointed out that Reform has promised migrant workers will lose their indefinite leave to remain if they get into government.

“So if you’ve worked as a care worker in nursing home for 40 years, you are already since last year not allowed to bring your children over,” the man said.

“When you get to 65, you’ll be sent back to where you came from, is that what you’re suggesting?”

Yusuf said: “No. It’s not at all. And if you’d paid attention to what we are announcing, you would not have that view.”

A surprised “ooh” went around the hall at that response, but Yusuf continued: “My mother is a care home worker –”

Migration minister Mike Tapp then chimed in: “Typically rude. Be polite to people at the same time. They’re not decent, that’s the problem.”

Yusuf ignored the response to his tone and said Reform have announced they will have an “acute skills shortage visa specifically for sectors like the care home sector”.

The Reform representative also hit out at the show later, criticising the BBC for supposedly “planting” small boat migrants in the audience.

Yusuf told GB News: “How on earth it should be deemed appropriate that people who have broken into this country illegally should have a seat at the table in a discussion about illegal immigration… it is bewildering.”

Share Button

Pact Or No Pact, Reform May Already Turning Into The Tories 2.0

Nigel Farage seemed to attract even more attention than usual this week – and not exactly the kind he likes.

Not only has the Guardian revealed 28 witnesses have now accused him of making anti-semitic and racist remarks while he was at school but, according to the Financial Times, he told donors he expected to make a merger or a pact with the Tories before the next election.

When it comes to the allegations against him, the Reform leader has only admitted to engaging in “banter in a playground” and rebuffed the FT’s story completely.

But the reports evidently got to him. Farage stunned journalists on Thursday with a furious rant against the BBC and ITV in a press conference, accusing them of “hypocrisy”.

He also claimed there would be no deal with the Conservatives, and that any such allegations were “ludicrous”.

But, he did suggest Reform could engineer “reverse takeover” where he would absorb the party by winning over defectors.

But Farage insisted: “A deal with them as they are would cost us votes.”

Reform are indeed still ahead in the polls. More in Common predicted in a September mega-survey of 20,000 Brits that the next general election looks like it might be theirs to lose.

And the racism row is yet to put a major dent in their consistent poll lead: YouGov found the party is still ahead on 25% as of December 1, with Labour on 22% and the Tories on 19%.

If it did not scare off too many supporters, a combined the Tory and Reform votes would give a joint right-wing party a very generous lead in the polls (44%, according to YouGov).

But Farage’s apparent dismay over the idea of working with the Conservatives ignores an obvious fact that his party is already made up of former Tories.

“There’s a chance that Reform begin to look like the same sort of political party the public are so keen to break away from.”

He has accepted 21 individuals who have previously been elected as Conservative MPs to his party just since the 2024 general election.

Danny Kruger was serving in the shadow cabinet when he crossed the floor to join Reform in September.

Former Tory minister Andrea Jenkyns became Reform’s first mayor when she was elected to represent Greater Lincolnshire in April, while ex-culture secretary Nadine Dorries joined earlier this year.

Former MPs, Ee-deputy party chair Jonathan Gullis, Lia Nici and Chris Green, also joined just this week.

In fact, the party’s first MP was Lee Anderson, the former deputy chairman for the Tories who defected to Reform in early 2024.

Reform’s deputy Richard Tice was a Conservative donor and party member up until 2019, and Farage himself was a Tory until 1992.

The party leader even failed to rule out accepting right-wing Conservative shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick into the fold at some point in the future.

He justified accepting former Tory MPs by admitting people who have been in government just help strengthen the party, and seems to position Reform’s success directly against the Conservatives’ decline – even if unintentionally.

Just this week, when playing down reports of a merger, he said: “We will ensure [the Tories] cease to be a national party in May.”

But one more prominent voice has tried to clear a distinct line between the two blue parties.

Reform’s head of policy Zia Yusuf even had to tell supporters on X grassroots would get priority over “washed up” ex-Tory MPs.

He said: “I’ve had many messages from Reform grassroots worried about former Tory MPs joining our party.

“I want to be clear to our Reform grassroots: YOU will be prioritised in candidate selection for our next class of MPs, NOT failed former Tory MPs.”

British Reform party leader Nigel Farage and Zia Yusuf, left, show the program Operation Restoring Justice during a press conference in a hangar at Oxford Airport in Kidlington, England, Tuesday, Aug. 26, 2025.
British Reform party leader Nigel Farage and Zia Yusuf, left, show the program Operation Restoring Justice during a press conference in a hangar at Oxford Airport in Kidlington, England, Tuesday, Aug. 26, 2025.

via Associated Press

This wariness from Yusuf about becoming the Tories 2.0 may be well-placed.

Political research director of pollsters at Savanta, Chris Hopkins, told HuffPost UK Reform risk starting to look like the sort of party the public are rejecting.

“Nigel Farage remains Reform’s greatest, and arguably sole, electoral weapon. It is he, and not really the infrastructure behind him, increasingly comprising of former Tories, that cements Reform’s appeal as an anti-establishment force,” Hopkins said.

“Providing he remains dominant at the top of the party, Reform will continue to be strong, but if a cabal of ex-Tories behind the scenes seek to undermine him, there’s a chance that Reform begin to look like the same sort of political party the public are so keen to break away from.”

The polling expert said that as a new party, Reform’s broadest appeal is that they no longer present a great electoral risk.

He said: “If they can’t trust the Tories to be competent after 14 years in government, and they can’t trust Labour after 18 months to have done any better, then why not roll the dice on something completely different. In short, how bad could they actually be?

“But that still relies on Reform UK looking different to the Tories.

“Minor defections don’t really move the needle with the public, but if there does become a sense that Reform UK are just the Conservatives 2.0, I’m less convinced of their appeal compared to what they have cultivated so far, which is a clean break and an alternative from the Con-Lab status quo.”

“”The last thing this country needs is a rinse and repeat of the last Conservative government.”

Their political opponents have been quick to criticise the idea of a merger, too, no matter how much Reform deny it.

Keir Starmer dubbed the idea of a Tory-Reform pact an “unholy alliance of austerity and failure” during prime minister’s questions on Wednesday.

A Labour Party spokesperson told HuffPost UK that Reform was becoming an “unsavoury cocktail of ex-Tories”.

“The Tories were responsible for breaking our public services and hammering family finances while in power. Now they are the recycled face of Nigel Farage’s party,” the representative said.

“Reform can’t fool the public. This unsavoury cocktail of ex-Tories want to inflict that damage all over again. It’s a risk working people simply can’t afford. ”

The Liberal Democrats called Reform a “Tory tribute act only separated by a slightly different shade of blue”.

The last thing this country needs is a rinse and repeat of the last Conservative government,” a spokesperson said.

Meanwhile the Green Party told HuffPost UK: “Conservative MPs defecting to Reform doesn’t concern us, we don’t want to intrude on the private grief of the right wing parties of inequality battling it out.”

While Reform has not taken any huge Tory figures yet, what the party chooses to do next – before the big test of the local elections in May – could define it in terms of its place on the political stage.

Will Farage play it safe by officially stepping into right-wing vacuum left by the Tories’ decline – or will he firmly establish Reform as an entirely new entity?

Share Button

Next gen cancer drug shows surprising anti aging power

Researchers at Queen Mary University of London’s School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences have demonstrated that the experimental TOR inhibitor rapalink-1 can extend the chronological lifespan of fission yeast, a simple organism widely used to explore basic biological processes.

A study published in Communications Biology by Juhi Kumar, Kristal Ng and Charalampos Rallis reports that both pharmaceuticals and naturally occurring metabolites can influence lifespan through the Target of Rapamycin (TOR) pathway.

TOR Pathway’s Central Role in Growth and Aging

The TOR pathway is an evolutionarily conserved signalling system found in organisms ranging from yeast to humans. It plays a vital part in regulating growth and aging and is closely linked to major age-related conditions, including cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. Because of its broad influence, TOR has become a major target in anti-aging and cancer research, with drugs such as rapamycin already showing an ability to extend healthy lifespan in several animal models.

Rapalink-1, the compound examined in the investigation, is a next-generation TOR inhibitor currently being studied for potential use in cancer therapy. The research team found that rapalink-1 slowed certain aspects of yeast cell growth while also extending their lifespan. The effect appears to operate through TORC1 — the growth-promoting component of the TOR pathway.

Discovery of a Metabolic Feedback Loop Involving Agmatinases

The study unexpectedly identified a significant role for a group of enzymes known as agmatinases, which convert the metabolite agmatine into polyamines. These enzymes appear to participate in a previously unrecognized “metabolic feedback loop” that helps maintain balanced TOR activity. When agmatinase activity was disrupted, yeast cells grew more quickly but showed signs of premature aging, revealing a trade-off between rapid growth and long-term cell survival.

The team also found that adding agmatine or putrescine (a related compound) supported longevity in yeast and improved growth under specific conditions.

“By showing that agmatinases are essential for healthy aging, we’ve uncovered a new layer of metabolic control over TOR — one that may be conserved in humans,” said Dr. Rallis. “Because agmatine is produced by diet and gut microbes, this work may help explain how nutrition and the microbiome influence aging.”

Caution Around Agmatine Supplementation

Rallis noted that agmatine supplements are available commercially but emphasized caution: “We should be cautious about consuming agmatine for growth or longevity purposes. Our data indicate the agmatine supplementation can be beneficial for growth only when certain metabolic pathways related to arginine breakdown are intact. In addition, agmatine does not always promote beneficial effects as it can contribute to certain pathologies.”

These findings highlight important connections between TOR signalling, metabolism and longevity. The results may help guide future strategies that pair TOR-targeting drugs with dietary or microbiome-based approaches in the study of healthy aging, cancer biology and metabolic disease.

Share Button

Scientists reveal a powerful heart boost hidden in everyday foods

People who frequently include foods and beverages rich in polyphenols, such as tea, coffee, berries, cocoa, nuts, whole grains and olive oil, may experience better heart health over time.

A team from King’s College London reported that individuals who followed dietary patterns high in polyphenols had lower predicted cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.

Polyphenols are naturally occurring plant compounds associated with a wide range of health benefits, including support for the heart, brain, and gut.

Long-Term Findings From a Large UK Cohort

The study, published recently in BMC Medicine, tracked more than 3,100 adults from the TwinsUK cohort for more than ten years. It found that diets rich in certain groups of polyphenols were linked to healthier blood pressure and cholesterol levels, which contributed to lower CVD risk scores.

For the first time, the researchers also assessed a large set of urine metabolites that appear when the body processes polyphenols.

These biomarkers showed that people with higher levels of polyphenol metabolites (especially those linked to flavonoids and phenolic acids) had lower cardiovascular risk scores. They also tended to have higher HDL cholesterol, also known as ‘good’ cholesterol.

A New Scoring Tool to Measure Polyphenol Intake

To better understand dietary patterns, the researchers used a newly designed polyphenol dietary score (PPS). This score reflects intake of 20 common polyphenol-rich foods in the UK, including tea, coffee, berries, olive oil, nuts, and whole grains.

The PPS demonstrated stronger links to cardiovascular health than estimates of total polyphenol intake. The team suggested that this may be because the PPS captures overall eating habits rather than focusing on single compounds. This supports the idea that looking at the full diet provides a clearer picture of how polyphenol-rich foods collectively contribute to long-term heart health.

Expert Perspectives on Heart Benefits

Professor Ana Rodriguez-Mateos, senior author and Professor of Human Nutrition at King’s College London, said: “Our findings show that long-term adherence to polyphenol-rich diets can substantially slow the rise in cardiovascular risk as people age. Even small, sustained shifts towards foods like berries, tea, coffee, nuts, and whole grains may help protect the heart over time.”

Dr. Yong Li, first author of the study, added: “This research provides strong evidence that regularly including polyphenol-rich foods in your diet is a simple and effective way to support heart health. These plant compounds are widely available in everyday foods, making this a practical strategy for most people.”

Connection Between Aging and Cardiovascular Risk

The researchers noted that although cardiovascular risk naturally increases with age, participants with higher polyphenol intake experienced a slower rise in risk across the 11-year follow-up period. They also highlighted the importance of future dietary intervention trials to confirm and expand on these findings.

Share Button

Wes Streeting Is Wrong. ADHD Is Not Overdiagnosed, I Should Know.

Yesterday (Dec 4), Health Secretary Wes Streeting announced that he would be launching an independent review into rising demand for mental health, ADHD, and autism services in England.

On the surface, this might seem like a good thing – mental health and neurodivergence healthcare is stretched thin in the UK, people are crying out for help, so what we need to do is find a way to improve those services so that people can get the support they need, right?

Unfortunately, no.

In fact, the headline aim of this review is to see whether there is evidence of over-diagnosis, with the BBC reporting that the government “believes there are people being referred onto waiting lists who do not need treatment.”

Streeting himself said these conditions were being over-diagnosed earlier this year, though he has since claimed in a piece for The Guardian that those remarks were “divisive” and had “failed to capture the complexity of this problem”.

He wrote: “The truth is there has been a massive growth in mental health and behavioural issues and there isn’t a consensus within the mental health clinical community on what is driving it. We must look at this through a strictly clinical lens to get an evidence-based understanding… That’s the only way we can ensure everyone gets timely access to accurate diagnosis and effective support.”

But, despite Streeting’s attempts to roll back his earlier comments about over-diagnosis, an emphasis on questioning what is “driving” an increase in mental health and neurodivergent diagnoses rather than how to support that increase is both erroneous and borderline offensive.

There is already widespread and growing stigma about conditions like ADHD, with regular discourse online and among politicians about whether those diagnosed are “truly” struggling, and language about finding “evidence” for what is behind this surge in demand only adds to that rhetoric.

I was diagnosed with ADHD nearly two years ago, after waiting 1.5 years for a diagnosis. To many, that might not sound like too long – in some places, there can be up to a 10-year wait for diagnosis – but I was battling with my symptoms long before I was first referred to a Right to Choose provider for assessment. I spent years struggling with basic household tasks, relationships, and school and work, finding myself unable to focus for long periods, and berating myself for not being “normal” like everyone else around me.

This was particularly bad during university when I had a lack of structure and was forced to discipline myself – something that people with ADHD notoriously find difficult – leading to me being diagnosed with severe anxiety and depression. It turns out that the deterioration in my mental health was a result of not knowing about my ADHD and therefore not dealing with it in the right way.

I also battled with internalised stigma about having ADHD, overrun by narratives that people are lying about having the condition, conning themselves into believing they have ADHD, or that it’s not so serious that it even requires diagnosis and intervention.

Many people with ADHD grapple with similar difficulties, meaning they are reluctant to seek a diagnosis or are not believed when they do. Receiving a formal diagnosis was important to me both to feel validated in how I approached work, relationships, and life itself in the past as well as to ensure that I was legally entitled to receive specialist support for the condition. Without a diagnosis, that can be much harder.

At one previous job, for example, I was unable to obtain reasonable adjustments – and received zero empathy from my line manager – until I received a formal diagnosis, meaning I was protected under the 2010 Equality Act.

The current system we operate under does leave many people being “written off”, like Streeting said, but not in the way he might think. It is not due to over-diagnosis but rather chronic underfunding and complex healthcare systems that are not fit-for-purpose, that leaves people in the dust.

Streeting’s review is also looking to “raise the healthiest generation, increase healthy life expectancy, and reduce suicide”, but further stigmatisation of these conditions is in direct conflict with that goal.

People with ADHD are in fact more at risk of suicide and have a lower life expectancy than those who are neurotypical, with 1 in 4 women, and 1 in 10 men, with ADHD will at some time try to take their own lives, while people with ADHD are likely to die between seven and nine years younger than their peers. This is why it is so important for people to be able to access mental health and neurodivergent diagnoses and support.

For Streeting to suggest that the rise in demand requires any intervention apart from additional funding as well as empathy for those struggling, is ridiculous.

I am not the only one who thinks so. Henry Shelford, CEO of campaigning organisation ADHD UK, told HuffPost UK: “ADHD is not overdiagnosed. A recent Lancet study published research that analysed 9 million GP records and showed just 0.32% of patients have a diagnosis of ADHD. That’s nudging just 10% of the 3-4% of the population who have ADHD.

“We’re underdiagnosed, not overdiagnosed. In addition, a BBC study showed the average wait for an ADHD diagnosis in England is 8 years. The idea that you can achieve overdiagnosis with an average wait of nearly a decade is just preposterous.”

If Streeting wants fewer people to be struggling with ADHD, autism, and associated mental health conditions, then the answer is to invest in those services and support the people who need it rather than blaming them for getting diagnosed in the first place. Focusing on “overdiagnosis”, and refusing to acknowledge just how broken our system is, will push more and more people to breaking point – and the whole country will be worse-for-wear as a result.

Share Button

Trump’s Rumored Theory On Exercise Has People Talking. Here’s What Experts Think.

At this point, it’s clear that President Donald Trump is a sleepy guy.

Earlier this week, Trump was caught dozing off while both Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner spoke during a Cabinet meeting.

It’s just the latest instance of the 79-year-old being photographed asleep on the job, a tendency that has led some, including Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.), to call him “Dozy Don.”

A sleepy President Donald Trump attends a meeting of his Cabinet alongside Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

Chip Somodevilla via Getty Images

A sleepy President Donald Trump attends a meeting of his Cabinet alongside Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

But if the president is tired, it’s probably not because of his exercise regimen. Last week, Trump’s interesting take on exercise resurfaced on social media after The New York Times published a detailed report on Trump showing signs of aging and making fewer public appearances in his second term compared to the same point in his first term.

Sandwiched between details about Trump’s diet (he’s apparently a red meat guy and eats “McDonald’s by the sackful”) and his weight, the Times mentioned the baffling views he reportedly holds on physical activity:

He does not get regular exercise, in part because he has a long-held theory that people are born with a finite amount of energy and that vigorous activity can deplete that reserve, like a battery.

It’s not the first time the media has reported this. In a 2017 profile on President Donald Trump in The New Yorker, writer Evan Osnos said Trump believes “a person, like a battery, is born with a finite amount of energy.”

While Trump has never explicitly stated this odd theory in his own words in public, sources say it’s a belief he’s held since he was a younger man. In the 2016 biography “Trump Revealed,” Washington Post reporters Michael Kranish and Marc Fisher write:

“After college, after Trump mostly gave up his personal athletic interests, he came to view time spent playing sports as time wasted. Trump believed the human body was like a battery, with a finite amount of energy, which exercise only depleted. So he didn’t work out. When he learned that John O’Donnell, one of his top casino executives, was training for an Ironman triathlon, he admonished him, ‘You are going to die young because of this.’”

It’s resurfaced that President Donald Trump has a rather interesting take on physical activity: Don't exercise, or you'll lose the finite amount of energy you were born with.

Illustration: HuffPost; Photo: Getty Images

It’s resurfaced that President Donald Trump has a rather interesting take on physical activity: Don’t exercise, or you’ll lose the finite amount of energy you were born with.

What does Trump do for exercise? If you count golf, plenty of that. But he also seems to think that just standing around is all the workout you need. Here’s what he told The New York Times magazine in 2015:

“Trump said he was not following any special diet or exercise regimen for the campaign. ‘All my friends who work out all the time, they’re going for knee replacements, hip replacements – they’re a disaster,’ he said. He exerts himself fully by standing in front of an audience for an hour, as he just did. ‘That’s exercise.’”

Is it, though? It’s a big stretch, said Christine Persaud, a sports medicine physician at SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University in Brooklyn, New York.

“Standing at a podium is better than sitting, but it does not strengthen the heart, muscles, or bones in the way that keeps people mobile and independent as they age,” Persaud said.

As for the claim that exercise depletes our energy reserves, as you probably could have guessed, that’s misguided, too.

“The idea that we are born with a fixed amount of energy that gets depleted by exercise like a battery does not match what we know in medicine,” Persaud told HuffPost.

Regular physical activity is what makes the body better at producing and using energy. For instance, a 2014 study pooling together data from over 40,000 adults found that marathon runners had a 30% lower risk of death and a 45% lower risk of cardiovascular mortality compared with non-runners.

Frequent exercise actually results in living longer.

“Exercise increases mitochondrial efficiency — essentially the body’s ‘power plants’ — and improves cardiovascular and metabolic health,” Persaud explained. “Long-term studies also show active people live longer and have lower rates of chronic disease.”

Trump does a lot of golfing, but not much else when it comes to exercise.

Jane Barlow – PA Images via Getty Images

Trump does a lot of golfing, but not much else when it comes to exercise.

Still, Trump isn’t the only person alive who appears to hold a weird “battery” theory of life force. Katie Gould, the founder of KG Strong, a kettlebell and strength training studio in Philadelphia, said she’s heard clients share their own versions of it.

“I’ve definitely had people worry that if they ‘use up’ their joints or heart with exercise, they’ll burn out faster,” Gould told HuffPost.

But our bodies aren’t phone batteries with a fixed charge; like our muscles, our bodies are systems that adapt to the demands we place on them, Gould said.

“Smart, appropriately dosed movement actually improves energy, resilience, and longevity over time,” she said. “What really wears us down isn’t using our bodies, it’s never using them at all.”

OK, but where would Trump have come up with this?

If you dwell on it long enough, Trump’s reported theory almost sounds like an ancient belief ― or at the very least, something no modern person would believe.

Aristotle did actually think that our bodies are animated by a kind of innate heat, and that death occurs when it is finally depleted. But the Greek philosopher and polymath was pro-exercise, according to Donald J. Robertson, a psychotherapist and author of “How to Think Like a Roman Emperor.”

“He certainly didn’t think we were at risk of ‘running out’ of energy by running around too much,” Robertson told HuffPost.

If anything, Trump has more in common with certain 19th-century vitalists, who worried that modern overstimulation and overexertion could drain the body’s “nerve force,” Robertson said.

“That led to a short-lived medical fad for diagnosing patients with ‘nervous exhaustion’ or neurasthenia,” the psychotherapist explained.

Silas Weir Mitchell, a Philadelphia-based physician, went on to develop the once-famous “rest cure” for neurasthenia, which was an extreme regimen of enforced inactivity, bed rest, and high-calorie feeding designed to rebuild the patient’s supposedly depleted vital reserves.

“I actually think it’s possible, unless he was joking, that Trump has somehow absorbed these sorts of ideas from somewhere or other,” Robertson said.

“The idea that we are born with a fixed amount of energy that gets depleted by exercise like a battery does not match what we know in medicine,” said Christine Persaud, a sports medicine physician.

Chip Somodevilla via Getty Images

“The idea that we are born with a fixed amount of energy that gets depleted by exercise like a battery does not match what we know in medicine,” said Christine Persaud, a sports medicine physician.

What should a 79-year-old person be doing for exercise to stay healthy?

The White House claimed earlier this week that Trump’s MRI from October, during his second “yearly” check-up in just six months, shows the 79-year-old is in “excellent health.” (It’s a statement that seems to be at odds with Trump’s diagnosis less than six months ago of “chronic venous insufficiency.”)

Sleeping on your physical fitness isn’t going to help most of us as we age, though. If anything, the misconception that exercise is dangerous is what actually puts people at higher risk for frailty, falls and chronic disease, Persaud said.

“While standing and public speaking is demanding and burns some calories, it does not provide the cardiovascular or musculoskeletal benefits that help people stay strong and independent as they age,” she said.

For adults, the American Heart Association recommends 150 minutes of moderately intense activity per week, plus strength training twice weekly. Even simple things like brisk walking, light strength work, or tai chi have proven benefits for heart health, mobility and longevity, Persaud told us.

Gould said that at 79, you want to have a mix of walking or other cardio, strength training for muscle and bone health, and some balance work to help prevent falls.

“The people I see thriving in their 70s and beyond aren’t just on their feet, they’re loading their muscles, challenging their hearts and moving in a variety of ways consistently,” she said.

At 79, you want to have a mix of walking or other cardio, strength training for muscle and bone health, and some balance work to help prevent falls, said Katie Gould, the founder of KG Strong, a kettlebell and strength training studio in Philadelphia.

FreshSplash via Getty Images

At 79, you want to have a mix of walking or other cardio, strength training for muscle and bone health, and some balance work to help prevent falls, said Katie Gould, the founder of KG Strong, a kettlebell and strength training studio in Philadelphia.

Gould added that blasé comments about exercise usually come from a place of considerable privilege. It’s easier to say you “don’t need” to work out when you have doctors tracking your labs, chefs managing your food, and money to throw at health problems, as the president does.

“Most people don’t have that, but they do have access to movement, and strength training in particular is one of the most powerful, affordable tools we have to live longer, more capable lives,” Gould said.

For women especially, lifting weights helps protect bone density, reduce fall risk, and build the confidence to move through the world on their own terms. She added that it’s an especially important message to emphasize right now as more people experiment with GLP-1s for weight loss.

“In a moment when so many people are being pushed toward quick fixes and weight-loss drugs, it’s important to remind folks that strength and sport are not cosmetic ― they’re health care,” she said.

Share Button

Architects gain a new superpower for complex curved designs

A researcher from the University of Tokyo and a structural engineer based in the United States have created a computational form-finding method that could reshape how architects and engineers design large, lightweight structures. Their approach is particularly valuable for developing gridshells, which are curved, thin surfaces formed from an interlinked grid of structural members. The method relies on NURBS surfaces, a common format used in computer-aided design (CAD), and significantly lowers the amount of computing power needed. A task that once required 90 hours on a high-end GPU now finishes in about 90 minutes on a standard CPU.

Architects place high priority on surfaces that can bear their own load. Some visually appealing examples are known as shells, and these have traditionally been made from reinforced concrete. Modern architects, however, are interested in limiting concrete due to its cost, waste, and lack of visual transparency. This has led to growing interest in gridshells, which use intersecting curved elements of metal, glass or timber to span wide areas without interior supports.

Why Gridshells Are Gaining Interest

Gridshells are well suited for covering expansive public spaces without columns. They are found at sites such as train station entrances, restored historic courtyards, and public squares. Notable examples include the British Museum’s Great Court, the glass roof at the Dutch Maritime Museum, and New York’s Moynihan Train Hall. Although these structures showcase what gridshells can achieve, designers have lacked standard computational tools that can efficiently manage the wide range of shapes they might want to build.

Masaaki Miki of the University of Tokyo and Toby Mitchell from the engineering firm Thornton Tomasetti collaborated to address this gap. Their new algorithm identifies ideal gridshell shapes that support complex geometries while still maintaining structural reliability.

Solving Long-Standing Challenges in Gridshell Design

Even though gridshell projects exist, the many geometric, mechanical, fabrication and construction requirements have made them difficult for most clients to pursue. Miki and Mitchell had already introduced a NURBS-based system capable of addressing many of these issues within one computational framework. However, two major limitations remained: their earlier method struggled with highly irregular shapes, and the computing time required was not practical. The updated method removes these obstacles, creating a more efficient workflow and making advanced gridshell form-finding feasible for a larger group of architects and designers.

“The project began in 2020 with an interest in shell structures, often made of concrete. Traditional designs aim for shapes that carry their own weight entirely through the force of compression, but this limits how expressive or sculptural they can be,” said Miki. “We set out to find new ways to design shells that consider forces of compression as well as tension, allowing greater design freedom. We adapted our approach to more modern metal-and-glass gridshells, developing methods to balance mechanical reliability, aesthetics and ease of construction. Recent advances in computational speed have made it possible to solve such complex conditions using rigorous methods.”

Using NURBS to Improve Precision and Speed

A major strength of the new method is that it works directly with NURBS surfaces. Unlike mesh-based approaches that use thousands of triangular pieces, NURBS provide smooth, continuous and mathematically accurate representations of curved surfaces. Because NURBS are already widely used in architectural design, integrating this method into existing workflows is straightforward. The research team created a plug-in for Rhinoceros, a popular NURBS-focused CAD program, allowing architects to use the approach within familiar software.

The method represents stress distribution on a NURBS surface and uses newly developed algorithms that increase processing speed by 98%. This improvement removes the need for high-end GPUs and provides a more accessible way to generate shapes that meet both geometric and structural requirements. The resulting gridshells remain stable under gravity and support metal-and-glass construction that is practical to assemble.

“Because we are addressing a real-world problem, we have been rigorously validating our solutions by several test methods we also developed,” said Miki. “When the tests revealed failures in the method, it was stressful. However, we are now totally happy because all solutions pass the tests.”

Future Directions

While the current research focuses on metal-and-glass gridshells, the team plans to expand the technique to include composite timber gridshells in the future.

This research was partially supported by the Nomura Foundation, the JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI; grant number 23K17784), and JST ASPIRE (grant number JPMJAP2401).

Share Button

Streeting orders review into mental health and ADHD diagnoses

The health secretary says the aim is to tackle a rising demand for services and pressure on the NHS.

Share Button