What Happens When You ‘Convince’ Your Partner To Have Kids? 4 People Share Their Stories

We all know – or know of – a couple who broke up because only one of them wanted children, even if that couple is just Sofía Vergara and Joe Manganiello.

Whether or not to become parents is one of the most important issues for couples to align on – and when they disagree, it can understandably be their undoing.

But life is never that straightforward, and in some cases, one person in the couple can sometimes change their mind about having kids. The other may even make the case to try and “convince” them to reconsider. This sometimes works out for them and sometimes doesn’t, but it’s certainly a fine line to tread.

“Deciding to have children isn’t something anyone should be pushed into,” Teresha Young, an international wellness and relationship coach told HuffPost.

“If a couple talks things through openly and honestly, and a partner decides of their own accord that they now want children, it can be a natural, healthy and positive shift. This often comes from finding common ground as a team, sharing hopes, and imagining a future together.”

We’re using the term “convincing” with a large helping of salt here, because this isn’t about coercion or putting pressure on a partner who simply does not want children. It’s much more nuanced than that.

“If anyone is being emotionally manipulated, guilt-tripped or blackmailed into parenthood, that’s a recipe for disaster,” Young said.

“No one should be forced into making such a significant life decision. That kind of pressure can breed resentment, bitterness, emotional disconnection and withdrawal. It might not surface straight away, but over time it can chip away at the relationship.”

In an ideal world, dating experts would typically advise that people start talking about whether or not they want kids in the long term in the first few dates.

“The conversations should begin with discussing your positive childhood memories, what you loved about how you were raised, and then transition into what you may do differently with your kids,” Spicy Mari, a relationship expert featured on Netflix’s Sneaky Links and founder of The Spicy Life, told HuffPost.

These conversations, Mari said, should take place whether you’re in your 20s or your 40s, especially if you know that you feel strongly one way or the other.

“If anyone is being emotionally manipulated, guilt-tripped or blackmailed into parenthood, that’s a recipe for disaster.”

– Teresha Young, international wellness and relationship coach

Still, people often find themselves in a long-term relationship where they don’t align with their partner on the kids question, whether they didn’t discuss it until they were already invested or one person changed their mind along the way. In this case, Young said to start with curiosity about your partner’s position.

“This is not about proving who is ‘right,’” the expert said. “It’s about listening with empathy, respecting each other’s perspectives, and exploring whether there’s room for alignment without pressure or guilt.”

If these conversations don’t yield any movement on either side, the couple will have to consider whether or not to continue the relationship given this information.

For obvious reasons, this isn’t a decision to take lightly. “Every child deserves to grow up in an environment that feels physically, emotionally and psychologically safe,” said Young. “For that to happen, both people need to genuinely want to become parents. If there’s hesitation or a lack of shared desire, there’s a risk of creating a situation where a child may not have the best chance to thrive.”

HuffPost spoke to people who say they felt they were “convinced” by their partner to have children, whether or not their relationship worked out in the end. Here’s what they told us.

1. The conference bargain

“My husband and I have been together for the past 10 years. On our second date, he said he was looking for something serious and wanted to know if I was looking for the same. I was too busy in my life to invest myself emotionally in a relationship without direction so I gave us a chance.

When I was younger I did not know I wanted children. It wasn’t until the opportunity to have children presented itself that I knew having children would be a natural next step for me. My husband did not have a strong opinion about having children or not having children. He has two children from a previous marriage, so he did not have a sense of urgency.

[He] changed his mind about having a child with me when I was accepted to speak at the International Peace Research Association’s conference in Sierra Leone. He was concerned I would not be safe [as an Iranian American psychologist] traveling to Sierra Leone and tried to convince me not to go. I didn’t see a point in putting my safety first unless I had a child, so my husband agreed to have a child with me.

For this reason, I upheld my end of the bargain by cancelling my speaking engagement at the conference in Sierra Leone. [Today], our 8-year old is funny, dynamic and cute. Parenting is a challenge, yet it is a false dichotomy to think that just because something is not easy that it is not worthwhile.”

— Dr. Azadeh Weber

2. Slow build

“My wife didn’t want kids at first […] because she grew up watching family members who lost their independence after becoming parents. She loved her work, and the idea of trading that in for diapers and sleepless nights didn’t seem like a path she wanted to take. But I really wanted kids. I didn’t pressure her, though.

I started with small conversations, usually while we were doing something relaxed like walking or cooking. I’d say things like, ‘If we had a daughter, I think you’d be the one teaching her how to travel light and figure out any airport like a pro,’ or, ‘I think you’d be the kind of mum who keeps her style and independence, even with a kid on her hip.’

I brought it into our day-to-day in a way that wasn’t heavy. I made changes to show her it didn’t have to look like what she feared. We blocked out full weekends just for ourselves, travelled often, and split all chores. I told her I’d take night shifts if we ever had a baby and that I’d make sure her work still came first when she needed it to. We even talked through how child care would work, who could help us, and what we’d keep doing as individuals and as a couple.

None of it happened in one moment. It was a slow build, always honest. Now we have two kids, and she’s still doing the work she loves, still travelling, still herself. I didn’t convince her with words. I helped her picture a life where having children added to what she already valued, not replaced it.”

— James Myers

Communication is key to making sure that you and your partner are on the same page about what parenthood (or staying child-free) means to you.

AJ_Watt via Getty Images

Communication is key to making sure that you and your partner are on the same page about what parenthood (or staying child-free) means to you.

3. Technical glitch

“We started dating in September 2020. We were together for a year before he allowed me to meet his daughter. (I always knew I wanted children.) I was one of three and from a very big family. I had also lost a child during a brutal miscarriage in my previous relationship. That kind of made it worse for me, I felt that the only way I could get over that was to have a child that survived. I was painfully aware that time was ticking by when we met so I told him during our first phone call that having children was a ‘dealbreaker’.

He didn’t explicitly tell me no. I think that he tried to on our first date, but I maybe didn’t want to hear it. He didn’t want another child as he had raised his daughter on his own from [when she was] five months old. He didn’t want to have to go through all that again when he was just ‘getting his life back’. I didn’t want any stepchildren as that had been my previous situation, and I found it challenging. We blame the app that we met on because we both thought that we had put in our preferences for children.

José discussed it with a friend – his words were, ‘I don’t want another child, but I want her, so that is the price’. We didn’t explicitly have the conversation either that I didn’t want a stepchild, but I knew that his daughter came with him as a package. I think having our own child has brought the four of us together as a family. His daughter now has a baby brother, and he brings so much joy and light into our lives that we all bond over our love for him. It has been the best thing I’ve ever done. And my partner says, ‘I didn’t want this, but now I couldn’t be without him.’

— Sophie Wilson

4. Baby bucket list

“In the beginning of our marriage, my husband worked at an adolescent psychiatric centre. He saw things there that were really hard on him. When I started bringing up that we should start trying, he would get silent and push the subject away. Then one day, he broke the news to me that he didn’t want kids anymore. I felt trapped, as I had always wanted to be a mum, and now I’m married to a guy who is taking that dream away from me.

The next day, I called my husband’s mum and shared with her what he had told me. My in-laws waited a few days and called my husband when they knew I wouldn’t be around. I’m so thankful for that phone call as I know my father-in-law told my husband, ‘You are going to lose her if you don’t give her children. It is your husband responsibility to do so.’

A few weeks later […] I sat down with my husband and explained to him that while I love him so much, I cannot be with someone that I resent for the rest of my life. That was the turning point for us. He finally opened up about the things that he saw at the psychiatric centre and how it scared him to have kids. He told me, ‘I will give you kids, but I just need some more time to get over what I saw.’

Time – OK, I can work with that! We had time. We were only 26 at this point! We worked on a ‘Baby Bucket List’ of things that we wanted to accomplish before we started trying to have kids. The last thing we had on our Baby Bucket List was to go skydiving together. In the plane 10,000 feet up, I looked at him and said, ‘This is the last thing.’

Two months later, we went out for a Christmas Eve dinner, just the two of us. It was there that he looked at me and said, ‘I’m ready. Thank you for waiting.’

We now have two kids, a boy who is 12 and a girl who is 10, and it is wild to me that the scared 20-something guy is the same guy who is helping me raise our kids. Our kids are so lucky to have him as a dad, and I am so blessed to have him as a husband.”

— Natasha Colkmire

Share Button

Trump Makes Awkward U-Turn After Failed Ceasefire Talks With Zelenskyy And Putin

After his highly criticised Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin ended without reaching a ceasefire agreement in the war in Ukraine, President Donald Trump now says he thinks it would be “better” if Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy met without him.

Speaking on Wednesday on “The Mark Levin Show,” Trump made the statement despite claiming to conservative podcaster Mark Levin that he had “very successful” exchanges with both leaders.

“I had a very successful meeting with President Putin. I had a very successful meeting with President Zelenskyy. And now I thought it would be better if they met without me, just to see. I want to see what goes on. You know, they had a hard relationship, very bad, very bad relationship,” Trump said.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy (left) and U.S. President Donald Trump during a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House on Monday.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy (left) and U.S. President Donald Trump during a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House on Monday.

Bloomberg via Getty Images

He continued, “And now we’ll see how they do and, if necessary, and it probably would be, but if necessary, I’ll go and I’ll probably be able to get it close.”

Trump went on to say that “they’re in the process of setting it up and we’re gonna see what happens,” adding, “But you gotta stop the killing, Mark, it’s too much killing.”

The president then said, “Nobody from America is being killed” in the war.

“United States soldiers aren’t involved,” he told Levin. “We have no boots on the ground, but when you lose 6,000, 5,000, 7,000 young people, and then you also lose some people from the towns and cities as missiles get lobbed into them, can you imagine living like that?”

Trump, who had a follow-up meeting with Zelenskyy and top European leaders in the Oval Office on Monday after Friday’s summit with Putin, made the comments after he announced plans to coordinate a summit between Putin and Zelenskyy in a bid to end the more-than-three-year war in Ukraine.

In a Truth Social post on Monday, Trump said he would also plan a trilateral meeting, in which he would take part, as a follow-up to a potential Putin and Zelenskyy meeting.

“At the conclusion of the meetings, I called President Putin, and began the arrangements for a meeting, at a location to be determined, between President Putin and President Zelenskyy,” Trump wrote. “After that meeting takes place, we will have a Trilat, which would be the two Presidents, plus myself.”

Listen to Trump’s appearance on “The Mark Levin Show” on YouTube.

Share Button

Rock Star Calls Trump ‘A Danger’ To ‘The Entire World’ In Fiery Instagram Post

Rock star Jack White continued his social media campaign against President Donald Trump on Wednesday with a fiery Instagram post.

The White Stripes guitarist made a post featuring various photos and videos of sketchy things Trump has done while president, including selling Bibles and gold shoes. It also included a scorched-earth critique of Trump as a leader.

“I was raised to believe that we defeated fascism in World War II and that we would never allow it again in the world,” White began the post, while admitting that he doesn’t always state his political opinions publicly or “know all of the facts.”

However, he said when it comes to “this man and this administration I’m not going to be like one of the silent minority of 1930′s Germany.”

White then declared Trump to be “a danger to not just America but the entire world and that’s not an exaggeration.”

White also pointed out that Trump is “dismantling democracy and endangering the planet on a daily basis, and we. all. know. it,” before ending the post with this quote from President Theodore Roosevelt:

“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

You can see the post as it appeared on social media below:

White’s latest post came a few hours after White House Communications Director Steven Cheung lashed out at the musician for a previous Instagram post where he criticised the president for turning the White House into “a vulgar, gold leafed and gaudy, professional wrestler’s dressing room.”

Cheung was so angered about White’s post that he referred to the 12-time Grammy winner and soon-to-be member of the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame as “a washed-up, has-been loser posting drivel on social media because he clearly has ample time on his hands due to his stalled career.”

White didn’t refer to Cheung in the post, but considering how testily the White House aide reacted to a basic style critique, it’s likely he will be even more miffed to see the post’s accusation that Trump is “dismantling democracy and endangering the planet on a daily basis.”

Share Button

Trump Has Middle-Of-The-Night Meltdown Over Critics Of His Failed Putin Summit

President Donald Trump lashed out at the criticism he’s faced for his Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin last week, which failed to result in a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine.

“The Fake News has been saying for 3 days that I suffered a ‘major defeat’ by allowing President Vladimir Putin of Russia to have a major Summit in the United States,” Trump wrote on Sunday evening in a Truth Social post that did not mention the outcome of the summit. “Actually, he would have loved doing the meeting anywhere else but the US, and the Fake News knows this. It was a major point of contention!”

Trump argued that his critics wouldn’t have been pleased even “if we had the Summit elsewhere” because “the Democrat run and controlled media would have said what a terrible thing THAT was.”

Claiming “these people are sick,” Trump transitioned into boasting about improving the crime in Washington, DC, and his efforts to “secure [the] Southern Border.”

“They even want CRIME IN D.C., and other BLUE Cities throughout our Country, but don’t worry, I won’t let that happen. Just like our now secure Southern Border (ZERO illegals in last 3 months!), our cities will be Secure and Safe, and D.C. will lead the way!”

The president followed up his lengthy comments by attacking Senator Chris Murphy (Democrat, Connecticut), who had slammed the Trump-Putin summit as an “embarrassment to the United States” Sunday while appearing on NBC’s Meet the Press.

“The very unattractive (both inside and out!) Senator from Connecticut, Chris Murphy, said ‘Putin got everything that he wanted.’ Actually, ‘nobody got anything,’ too soon, but getting close,” Trump wrote in a separate Truth Social post Sunday. “Murphy is a lightweight who thinks it made the Russian President look good in coming to America. Actually, it was very hard for President Putin to do so.”

Wrapping up his post, Trump also called out his former national security adviser John Bolton, who told CNN that Putin had “won the summit” over a “tired” Trump.

“This war can be ended, NOW, but stupid people like Chris Murphy, John Bolton, and others, make it much harder to do so,” Trump added.

U.S. President Donald Trump welcomes Russian President Vladimir Putin to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson on Aug. 15, 2025, in Anchorage, Alaska.
U.S. President Donald Trump welcomes Russian President Vladimir Putin to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson on Aug. 15, 2025, in Anchorage, Alaska.

Contributor via Getty Images

Just minutes later, Trump directed his attention to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, arguing that Zelenskyy could “end the war with Russia almost immediately if he wants to.” He then bashed former President Barack Obama.

“President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight,” Trump wrote. “Remember how it started. No getting back Obama given Crimea (12 years ago, without a shot being fired!), and NO GOING INTO NATO BY UKRAINE. Some things never change!!!”

Trump’s slew of pointed posts aimed at his opponents didn’t stop there.

Just hours before he was scheduled to host Zelenskyy at the White House, Trump railed against “badly failing Radical Left Democrats.”

“I am totally convinced that if Russia raised their hands and said, ‘We give up, we concede, we surrender, we will GIVE Ukraine and the great United States of America, the most revered, respected, and powerful of all countries, EVER, Moscow and St. Petersburg, and everything surrounding them for a thousand miles, the Fake News Media and their Democrat Partners would say that this was a bad and humiliating day for Donald J. Trump, one of the worst days in the history of our Country,’” Trump wrote in a Monday Truth Social post.

He added: “But that’s why they are the FAKE NEWS, and the badly failing Radical Left Democrats. Thank you for your attention to this matter!!!”

Minutes later, Trump claimed in a post that the “Russia/Ukraine MESS” is “Sleepy Joe Biden’s war, not mine,” adding, “ I’m only here to stop it, not to prosecute it any further. It would have NEVER happened if I was President.”

Elsewhere in the post, Trump claimed that The Wall Street Journal and “many other” news outlets “don’t have a clue” about the number of conflicts he’s resolved since his second term began.

“I’ve settled 6 Wars in 6 months, one of them a possible Nuclear disaster, and yet I have to read & listen to the Wall Street Journal, and many other who truly don’t have a clue, tell me everything that I am doing wrong…”

Trump’s meeting with Zelenskyy in the Oval Office on Monday marks the Ukrainian leader’s first White House visit since the two had a highly contentious meeting in February.

Meanwhile, Zelenskyy praised Trump’s strength in a post on X, formerly Twitter, on Monday morning ahead of their meeting.

“We discussed the battlefield situation and our strong diplomatic capabilities – Ukraine’s and all of Europe’s together with America,” he wrote. “Russia can only be forced into peace through strength, and President Trump has that strength. We have to do everything right to make peace happen. Thank you!”

Share Button

‘You Like This Idea’: Trump Jokes About Cancelling 2028 Elections To Fight War

As President Donald Trump sat down Monday with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to discuss bringing an end to Russia’s three-year war, he was confronted with the fact that Ukraine has not been able to hold elections amid the brutal fighting.

Zelenskyy had fielded a question from a reporter on whether he would be open to elections upon reaching a peace agreement.

“Yes, of course,” the Ukrainian leader said, noting that the government would need to ensure the polls would be safe and secure.

Trump then jumped in: “So, you’re saying, during the war you can’t have elections. So let me just say, 3 and a half years from now, so, you mean if we happen to be in a war with somebody, no more elections.”

“Oh, that’s good. I wonder what the fake news would say,” Trump added.

The comment, making light of the American tradition of a peaceful transfer of power, elicited some chuckles from those gathered in the packed Oval Office.

“You like this idea,” Zelenskyy responded with a laugh.

The Ukrainian president has remained in power despite his term having expired last year because the country declared martial law upon Russia’s 2022 invasion. While public support for Zelenskyy has dropped over the years of the conflict, however, there is little doubt in Ukraine that he remains the legitimate president during wartime.

Trump’s remark was likely to raise some eyebrows because his disdain for US election law — and apparent desire for an unconstitutional third term — is already so well-documented.

Trump insisted back in March that he was “not joking” about the possibility of serving as president a third time, claiming that “a lot of people” wanted him to do so. Emil Bove, whom Trump chose to sit on a federal appellate court, refused to rule out the possibility of a third Trump term during congressional questioning.

Representative Andy Ogles (Republican, Tennessee), a die-hard Trump ally, floated the idea just over the weekend.

Trump also still falsely insists he was the true winner of the 2020 presidential election, refusing to consider the total lack of evidence, although he seems to have come to terms with it after his 2024 victory meant he will be president during such high-profile events as the 2026 Olympics and the nation’s 250th anniversary.

Earlier Monday, he took aim at the validity of mail-in ballots and electronic voting machines, potentially opening the door to voter suppression tactics that could disproportionately affect his political opponents.

Share Button

Trump Piles Pressure On Zelenskyy To End The War Putin Started In Bizarre Truth Social Rant

Donald Trump has piled pressure on Volodymyr Zelenskyy to end the war in Ukraine – even though it was started by Russia’s invasion of his country more than three years ago.

In a bizarre rant on his Truth Social platform, the US president said the Ukrainian leader “can end the war with Russia almost immediately if he wants to”.

Trump said Ukraine must give up any hope of regaining Crimea, which was annexed by Russia in 2014, and said Kyiv should also give up on its ambition of joining Nato.

His tirade came as he prepares to meet Zelenskyy in the White House later today.

The last time the pair met in the Oval Office six months ago, the Ukrainian president was ambushed by both Trump and his deputy, JD Vance.

Trump’s comments will be warmly welcomed by Vladimir Putin, who held talks with his American counterpart in Alaska on Friday.

Russia is vehemently opposed to Ukraine’s aim of becoming a Nato member.

Putin told Trump that he wants Ukraine to give up the Donbas region of Ukraine as the price of any peace deal.

According to the Reuters news agency, that would see Kyiv fully withdraw from the eastern Donetsk and Luhansk regions in return for a Russian pledge to freeze the front lines in the southern regions of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia.

Trump said after the summit that he and Putin “has largely agreed” on land transfers and security guarantees for Ukraine.

In another win for the Russian president, Trump also U-turned on his previous calls for a ceasefire in the war before a full-blown peace deal.

But speaking in Brussels on Sunday, Zelenskyy said that was unacceptable.

He said: “We have to stop the killing. Putin has many demands, but we do not know all of them, and if there are really as many as we hear, then it will take time to go through them all.

“It’s impossible to do this under the pressure of weapons, so it’s necessary to ceasefire and work quickly on a final deal. Putin does not want to stop the killing, but he must do it.”

On Russian demands for Ukrainian territory, Zelenskyy said: “The constitution of Ukraine makes it impossible to give up territory or trade land. ”

Share Button

UK Reveals Deadly Reason Why Putin Wants Ukraine To Hand Over Unoccupied Land To End War

The Ministry of Defence has revealed why Vladimir Putin wants Ukraine to hand over large swathes of its unoccupied land to end the war.

In its latest intelligence update on the conflict, the MoD said Russia would be forced to fight for more than four years and suffer nearly two million casualties if it had to fight for it.

The analysis came as Putin set out his peace plans at a summit with Donald Trump in Alaska.

According to the Reuters news agency, the proposed deal would see Ukraine fully withdraw from the eastern Donetsk and Luhansk regions in return for a Russian pledge to freeze the front lines in the southern regions of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia.

But the MoD said: “Based on the rate of Russia’s incremental battlefield advances so far in 2025, it would take Russian forces approximately 4.4 more years to gain 100% of the four Ukrainian oblasts’ territory.

“Based on Russia’s average daily casualty rate in 2025 so far, as reported by Ukrainian general staff, 4.4 more years of war would lead to approximately 1,930,000 further Russian casualties (killed and wounded).

“This is in addition to the approximately 1,060,000 casualties Russia has already likely sustained since launching the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, including around 250,000 killed or missing (presumed dead).”

After his talks with Putin, Trump told Sean Hannity on Fox News: “I think we’re pretty close to a deal. Ukraine has to agree to it. Maybe they’ll say ‘no’.”

But speaking following talks with European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen in Brussels today, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy said: “The constitution of Ukraine makes it impossible to give up territory or trade land. ”

He said any such moves would need to be discussed at a three-way summit involving him, Putin and Trump.

Von der Leyen, also insisted that “international borders cannot be changed by force”.

Share Button

Trump Writes Post About Moscow That’s Absurd Even For Him

President Donald Trump on Sunday really reached to criticise outlets for their coverage of his peace talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

“If I got Russia to give up Moscow as part of the Deal, the Fake News, and their PARTNER, the Radical Left Democrats, would say I made a terrible mistake and a very bad deal,” he wrote on Truth Social. “That’s why they are the FAKE NEWS!”

Trump also said on Truth Social Sunday that an announcement on “BIG PROGRESS” in the negotiations was forthcoming, but some observers were still cracking wise over his sarcastic Moscow gripe.

Share Button

So THAT’s Why You’re Meant To Wash Jeans Inside Out

I never used to wash my jeans inside out, until I met my other half who – it turns out – knows quite a lot about laundry. He was adamant that jeans (and indeed many items of clothing) should be washed inside out.

But I never really understood why. It turns out I’m not the only one.

In a question submitted to The Guardian recent, reader Paul Williams asked: “Why does my wife make me turn my jeans inside out before they go in the wash? She doesn’t know either.”

There were 44 responses from other readers, at the time of writing, including this gem: “In Malaysia, I learnt to turn washing inside out to dry so that the hot sun could really get to any damp loving bugs lurking in the thicker seams.”

Another person said they’d assumed it was to stop the zips rubbing against, or catching on, other garments.

Why should you wash jeans inside out?

It’s actually to do with preserving the look of your jeans, according to Levi’s.

The denim brand advises to always turn jeans inside out before putting them in the washing machine.

“This simple (but usually neglected) step protects the outer colour from fading and minimises direct contact with chemicals and detergents,” the brand explained.

“This step is especially important for dark-wash and black jeans that are more prone to colour loss or transfer.”

Similarly, Guardian reader ‘rigoletto’ explained: “Denim is yarn dyed in such a way that the colour is only on the surface of the yarn. The dye particles are vulnerable to abrasion, which is why the fabric goes white at the stress points, where the original colour of the yarn starts to show through.

“Washing inside out reduces the chance of abrasion against the drum of the machine and premature fading.”

Makes sense.

Any other tips for washing jeans?

Yes! Levi’s suggested we should be washing jeans after roughly 10 wears, “unless they are visibly dirty or start to smell”.

Consumer watchdog Which? puts it at six to 10 wears.

When you go to wash your jeans, make sure all the zips and buttons are done up (to help maintain shape and prevent snagging) and use a mild detergent, avoiding fabric softeners (which can “leave a residue” on denim) where possible.

The best temperature to wash on is the coolest one, as higher temperatures can shrink your jeans and result in colour loss.

Happy laundering!

Share Button

Research Just Confirmed Why Bluey Is A Great TV Show For Kids *And* Parents

I’m not sure who loves Bluey more: my kids or, well, me.

No, actually, I do. It’s me. I know the names of most of the characters; Sleepytime is flat-out my favourite episode (I cry every time I watch it); and when I heard there was a Bluey movie in production, I actually gasped.

The show is often praised for it’s progressive approach to parenting – and for being entertaining, even for adults.

And it turns out there’s yet another reason to tune in to the Australian children’s TV show…

While the parenting lessons are great (they’re often either highly amusing, or heart-wrenchingly relatable), so too are the lessons kids can take away from the show – in particular, the themes of resilience, according to a new study.

Why is resilience important?

Resilience is the ability to cope when something difficult or bad has happened – it’s important for kids to learn and build on throughout their lives.

With one in five young people (aged 8-25 years old) in England thought to have a mental health disorder, and a health service that’s struggling to cope with demand, a lot of talk in the UK has recently shifted to improving children’s resilience as a solution.

Experts believe that encouraging better resilience in children and young people would help equip those with low-level mental health problems with improved coping skills.

You can read more on building resilience in kids, here.

If you haven’t yet watched the cartoon series, it follows a blue dog called (yep, you guessed it) Bluey, her younger sister Bingo and their parents as they try to navigate life’s highs and lows.

Researchers had the enviable task of watching 150 episodes (all three seasons) and found almost half of the episodes (48.7%) featured resilience as either a primary or secondary theme.

Bluey, the main character, featured in 54.8% of resilience storylines. Parents were the main facilitators (64.4%), with Bluey’s mum Chilli being the most common (46.6%).

Researchers concluded that the popular TV show frequently portrays resilience-building behaviours, especially through family relationships and coping strategies.

“These findings highlight Bluey as a strong example of how children’s television can support emotional learning and model adaptive behaviours relevant to real-life challenges,” the researchers said.

In a linked piece for The Conversation, one of the study’s authors, Bradley Smith, senior lecturer in Psychology at CQUniversity Australia, pointed out that research shows “the earlier we support resilience-building, the better”. And that early interventions can help build healthy coping skills.

He added: “Storytelling in films, books and TV can show children how to navigate challenges – not through lectures, but by modelling behaviours like emotional regulation, problem-solving and empathy.”

While TV shows can’t replace parenting and real relationships, Smith encouraged parents to watch episodes with their kids and to use them as conversation starters to discuss themes of resilience.

For example, he suggested you could ask them: what do you think Bluey felt then? Or, what would you do in that situation? Or how would you feel if that happened to you?

“Talking about what kids see on screen can help them reflect, process, and build the skills they need to cope, adapt and grow,” he added.

Share Button