Atom-sized gates could transform DNA sequencing and neuromorphic computing

Ion channels are tiny openings that control the movement of charged particles in living organisms. These narrow pathways are essential for many biological functions. In some cases, their tightest sections measure only a few angstroms across, roughly the width of individual atoms. Reproducing structures this small with precision and consistency remains one of the toughest challenges in nanotechnology.

Researchers at The University of Osaka have now taken a major step toward that goal. Writing in Nature Communications, the team describes how they used a miniature electrochemical reactor to produce pores that approach subnanometer dimensions.

Mimicking Nature’s Electrical Gateways

Inside cells, ions travel through specialized protein channels embedded in the cell membrane. This ion movement generates electrical signals, including the nerve impulses responsible for muscle contraction. The channels are built from proteins and contain extremely narrow regions at the angstrom scale. When exposed to external signals, these proteins change shape, which allows the channels to open or close.

Drawing inspiration from this natural system, the researchers designed a solid-state version capable of forming pores nearly as small as biological ion channels. They began by creating a nanopore in a silicon nitride membrane. That nanopore then acted as a tiny reaction chamber for building even smaller pores within it.

When the team applied a negative voltage across the membrane, it triggered a chemical reaction inside the nanopore. This reaction produced a solid precipitate that gradually expanded until it completely blocked the opening. Reversing the voltage caused the precipitate to dissolve, restoring conductive pathways through the pore.

“We were able to repeat this opening and closing process hundreds of times over several hours,” explains lead author Makusu Tsutsui. “This demonstrates that the reaction scheme is robust and controllable.”

Electrical Spikes Reveal Subnanometer Pores

To better understand what was happening inside the membrane, the researchers monitored the ion current passing through it. They observed sharp spikes in the current, similar to patterns seen in biological ion channels. Further analysis indicated that these signals were most consistent with the formation of numerous subnanometer pores within the original nanopore.

The team also discovered that they could fine-tune how the pores behaved. By adjusting the chemical composition and pH of the reactant solutions, they altered both the size and properties of the ultrasmall openings.

“We were able to vary the behavior and effective size of the ultrasmall pores by changing the composition and pH of the reactant solutions,” reports Tomoji Kawai, senior author. “This enabled selective transport of ions of different effective sizes through the membrane by tuning the ultrasmall pore sizes.”

Applications in DNA Sequencing and Neuromorphic Computing

This chemically driven approach makes it possible to generate multiple ultrasmall pores inside a single nanopore. The technique offers a new way to study how ions and fluids move through extremely confined spaces at scales comparable to living systems.

Beyond fundamental research, the technology could support emerging fields such as single-molecule sensing (e.g., using nanopores to sequence DNA), neuromorphic computing (using electrical spikes to mimic the behavior of biological neurons), and nanoreactors (creating unique reaction conditions through confinement).

Share Button

Trump Changes His Mind On Starmer’s Chagos Deal Again, Calling It A ‘Blight’ On The UK

Donald Trump has attacked Keir Starmer’s Chagos deal once again, describing it as a “big mistake” and a “blight” on the UK.

The UK government announced last year that it was going to pay Mauritius £9 billion over the next 99 years so the UK-US military base at Diego Garcia will continue to operate as it does at the moment.

The US president initially seemed in favour of the deal but, at the height of his row with Europe over the sovereignty of Greenland in January, he changed his mind.

He accused Britain of giving away the “vital US military base” for “NO REASON WHATSOEVER”.

He then backtracked just two weeks ago, after a phone call with the prime minister, describing it as the best deal Starmer “could make”, though he warned that the US retains “the right to militarily secure and reinforce the American presence in Diego Garcia”.

The US did give its official backing to the UK’s plan to cede sovereignty of the territory only on Tuesday.

However, Trump has just changed his mind again, writing on TruthSocial that he has told Starmer “leases are no good when it comes to countries”.

He claimed to have warned the PM that “he is making a big mistake by entering a 100 year lease”.

He added: “Prime minister Starmer is losing control of this important Island by claims of entities never known of before. In our opinion, they are fictitious in nature.”

Trump suggested the US might need the archipelago if Iran does not agree to a new nuclear deal.

The president concluded: “We will always be ready, willing, and able to fight for the UK, but they have to remain strong in the face of Wokeism.”

A Foreign Office spokesperson said: “The deal to secure the joint UK-US military base on Diego Garcia military is crucial to the security of the UK and our key allies, and to keeping the British people safe.

“The agreement we have reached is the only way to guarantee the long-term future of this vital military base.”

Talks between the US and Mauritius are scheduled for next week.

Read Trump’s full message below:

I have been telling Prime Minister Keir Starmer, of the United Kingdom, that Leases are no good when it comes to Countries, and that he is making a big mistake by entering a 100 Year Lease with whoever it is that is “claiming” Right, Title, and Interest to Diego Garcia, strategically located in the Indian Ocean. Our relationship with the United Kingdom is a strong and powerful one, and it has been for many years, but Prime Minister Starmer is losing control of this important Island by claims of entities never known of before. In our opinion, they are fictitious in nature. Should Iran decide not to make a Deal, it may be necessary for the United States to use Diego Garcia, and the Airfield located in Fairford, in order to eradicate a potential attack by a highly unstable and dangerous Regime — An attack that would potentially be made on the United Kingdom, as well as other friendly Countries. Prime Minister Starmer should not lose control, for any reason, of Diego Garcia, by entering a tenuous, at best, 100 Year Lease. This land should not be taken away from the U.K. and, if it is allowed to be, it will be a blight on our Great Ally. We will always be ready, willing, and able to fight for the U.K., but they have to remain strong in the face of Wokeism, and other problems put before them. DO NOT GIVE AWAY DIEGO GARCIA!

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said: “The post should be taken as the policy of the Trump administration, it’s coming straight from the horse’s mouth.

“When you see it on Truth Social you know it’s directly from President Trump, that’s the beauty of this president in his transparency and relaying this administration’s policies.”

Tory shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel said these remarks will be an “utter humiliation” for Starmer.

She said: “It’s time Starmer finally saw sense, U-turned and scrapped this appalling deal altogether.”

Lib Dem leader Ed Davey wrote on X: “Trump’s endless flip-flopping on the Chagos Islands shows why Starmer’s approach is doomed to fail.

“Britain can’t rely on the US while Trump is in the White House. It’s time to strengthen our ties with allies we can depend on, starting with our neighbours in Europe.”

Reform’s Nigel Farage also said: “Thank goodness Trump has vetoed the surrender of the Chagos islands.”

Four people who live on the Chagos island also set up camp on the archipelago’s remote atoll this week to protest the deal.

They refused to leave, despite facing eviction threats from the UK maritime patrol.

Share Button

NHS joint ops disrupted amid bone cement supply problems

Around 1,000 operations a week rely on the product as patients are warned delays are inevitable.

Share Button

What Experts Think Of The Showering In The Dark Before Bed Trend

A new wellness trend has hit social media – and while it’s usually tempting to approach these trends with a healthy dose of skepticism, this one might actually be worth trying.

It’s called ‘dark showering’ and it’s exactly what it sounds like: showering in the dark, not long before you wind down for the night. A cosy nighttime routine that puts you into a restful mindset and could, in theory, help you get a good night’s sleep.

It doesn’t have to be pitch black, and dimming the lights could be enough (or even just leaving your hallway light on and the bathroom door ajar), but it does appear to feel good for some people.

As @Emgilly on TikTok said: “One way I reset my nervous system as a [Stay At Home Mom] is by taking a shower in the dark. Try it, it works.”

Why might showering in the dark work?

First things first, we know that dimming the lights can help us tell our bodies it’s time to sleep.

Writing for The Conversation, Timothy Hearn, a lecturer in Bioinformatics, said: “Bright light in the evening signals to the brain’s internal body clock that it is still daytime. This delays the release of melatonin, a hormone that helps regulate sleep and is often described as the body’s ‘darkness signal’.

“In a laboratory study of 116 adults, typical room lighting between dusk and bedtime reduced early night melatonin levels by about 70% compared with very dim light. Exposure to room light before bed also shortened the total duration of melatonin release by about 90 minutes. Participants reported feeling more alert.”

Then there’s the warm water element. Just like parents use bathtime as a sleep cue for their kids, having a warm shower can work in a similar way. But why does it work?

The Sleep Foundation explains: “Body temperature plays an important role in the sleep-wake cycle, and human bodies naturally experience a decrease in core body temperature before nightly sleep.

“Scientists have found that by impacting this natural temperature regulation process, showers and baths can affect sleep.”

It’s been dubbed the “warm bath effect” – and one analysis found taking a shower or bath in water that’s around 40-degrees Celsius can improve sleep quality.

HuffPost UK spoke exclusively to Archie MacDonald, director of Highland Soap Co., who also believes scent plays a “huge role” in how we experience relaxation.

“When you shower in low light, fragrance becomes more noticeable because your senses aren’t competing with visual stimulation,” he said.

“Certain essential oils, like lavender and patchouli, are known to help calm the nervous system and reduce feelings of stress, which is why scent-led rituals can have such a powerful effect on mood and wellbeing.

“A dark shower allows that sensory experience to come to the foreground, turning an everyday routine into something more restorative.”

For the best results, sleep physician Dr David Rosen recommends having a warm shower at least one hour before bed.

Why are dark showers so popular suddenly?

MacDonald suggested the trend is gaining popularity because people are increasingly aware of how overstimulation, screens and busy schedules affect them, and they’re looking for simple ways to unwind that fit into daily life.

“Dark showering doesn’t require extra time or space, but it creates a clear shift from day to night through scent and atmosphere,” he added.

“That focus on small, intentional rituals reflects a wider move towards protecting wellbeing in achievable, sustainable ways.”

It’s got to be worth a try, right?

Share Button

Children injured by NHS can claim damages for lifetime lost earnings, court rules

The decision from the Supreme Court, on the case of a child who sustained a brain injury at birth in 2015, could have significant cost implications for the NHS.

Share Button

This Is The Psychology Behind Why You Can’t Get Over THAT Ex

We all know that Wuthering Heights is not about a love that we should aspire to, right? We know that their bond was eventually very toxic, that they mistreated each other and everybody around them, and it ended anything but happily ever after.

All of that being said, watching Emerald Fennell’s take on the novel can definitely remind you of a certain ex. Not the one you had an amicable split with, not the ‘fun summer fling’. No. This ex is the one that you had the senselessly passionate relationship with. Everything was aflame and when it ended, you went no-contact. Probably because your friends begged you to.

It’s not romantic but it’s definitely alluring: the thrill of the chase, the passion between you, the way they took up residence in your head and squeezed into every thought… they’re pretty unforgettable, probably quite toxic, and seeing a highly stylised version on-screen with this blockbuster can easily reignite certain memories.

Why you can’t get over your toxic ex

On paper it should be easy, but getting over this kind of ex is not simple, much like the bond itself – as divorce coach Carol Madden notes on Medium: toxic relationships take longer to heal from than healthier ones.

Speaking to Business Insider, relationship expert Jessica Alderson explained that these kind of relationships are a bit like an addiction, saying: “They are often characterised by extreme highs, during which relationships seem perfect and magical, followed by crashing lows, which are usually caused by a partner pulling away or acting out – this can make people feel alive.”

Once the relationship finally ends, your body can still crave this unpredictability. She added: “The emotional rollercoaster can make it harder to move on and accept that the relationship wasn’t meant to be.”

How to get over an ex

Clinical psychologist Dr Ruth Ann Harpur suggested that after a relationship breaks down, people will naturally try to seek answers about where it all went wrong – and while it’s a “crucial step” in the early moments of the breakup, it’s important not to keep going over every detail of the relationship and your ex’s behaviour.

If you get stuck ruminating, you become “tied to the past” and end up reliving the pain, she suggested. So, her advice is to: “Understand that ruminating on past abuses may feel safe but it keeps you from living fully in the present and building healthier relationships.”

She also urges people to focus on activities they really enjoy to keep busy and connect with themselves again, and to open themselves to new friendships and relationships.

Experts at Calm have a guide to getting over a relationship with advice that includes:

  • Clearing out physical reminders of them.
  • Allowing yourself to feel your feelings.
  • Limiting or cutting contact with them, including on social media.
  • Setting new goals.
  • And seeking therapy.

It isn’t easy, but you can move on.

Share Button

Sugary drinks linked to rising anxiety in teens

A new study reports a clear association between high sugar drink intake and anxiety symptoms in teenagers.

Researchers from Bournemouth University collaborated on a large review that examined findings from multiple earlier studies exploring the relationship between diet and mental health. By analyzing the combined data, the team looked for patterns that appeared consistently across different groups of young people. The results were published in the Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics.

Mental Health Often Overlooked in Diet Research

“With increasing concern about adolescent nutrition, most public health initiatives have emphasized the physical consequences of poor dietary habits, such as obesity and type-2 diabetes,” said Dr. Chloe Casey, Lecturer in Nutrition and co-author of the study. “However, the mental health implications of diet have been underexplored by comparison, particularly for drinks that are energy dense but low in nutrients,” she added.

Anxiety disorders remain one of the most common mental health challenges among young people. In 2023, an estimated one in five children and adolescents were living with a mental health disorder, and anxiety was among the most frequently reported conditions.

Survey Data Links Sugary Beverages to Anxiety Symptoms

The studies included in the review relied on survey data to measure both sugary drink consumption and mental health symptoms. Drinks high in sugar can include fizzy sodas, energy drinks, sweetened juices, squashes, sweetened tea and coffee, and flavored milks.

Across the research analyzed, the findings pointed in the same direction. Higher consumption of sugary beverages was consistently associated with greater reports of anxiety symptoms in adolescents.

Association Does Not Prove Cause

The researchers stress that the evidence does not show sugary drinks directly cause anxiety. Because the review was based on previously conducted studies, it cannot determine cause and effect.

It is possible that teens who already experience anxiety may consume more sugary drinks. Other shared influences, such as family circumstances or sleep disorders, could also contribute to both increased sugar intake and anxiety symptoms.

“Whilst we may not be able to confirm at this stage what the direct cause is, this study has identified an unhealthy connection between consumption of sugary drinks and anxiety disorders in young people,” Dr. Casey said.

“Anxiety disorders in adolescence have risen sharply in recent years so it is important to identify lifestyle habits which can be changed to reduce the risk of this trend continuing,” she concluded.

The study was led by former Bournemouth University PhD student Dr. Karim Khaled, who now works at Lebanese American University, Beirut.

Share Button

Intermittent fasting fails to beat standard dieting for weight loss

Intermittent fasting does not appear to help overweight or obese adults lose more weight than standard diet advice or even no structured program at all, according to a new Cochrane review. The findings challenge the widespread belief that changing when you eat leads to better weight loss results than traditional approaches.

Obesity remains a major public health concern and is now one of the leading causes of death in high income countries. The World Health Organization reports that adult obesity rates have more than tripled globally since 1975. In 2022, about 2.5 billion adults were overweight, including 890 million who were living with obesity.

At the same time, intermittent fasting has gained enormous popularity. Social media trends, wellness influencers, and claims of fast weight loss and improved metabolism have helped turn fasting into a mainstream strategy.

Review of 22 Clinical Trials Finds No Clear Benefit

To evaluate whether intermittent fasting truly offers an advantage, researchers examined data from 22 randomized clinical trials involving 1,995 adults in North America, Europe, China, Australia, and South America. The studies tested different fasting methods, including alternate-day fasting, periodic fasting, and time-restricted feeding. Most followed participants for up to one year.

When compared with conventional diet advice or no intervention, intermittent fasting did not produce a clinically meaningful difference in weight loss. In practical terms, fasting schedules did not outperform more traditional guidance or doing nothing specific.

Researchers also noted that side effects were not consistently reported across studies, making it difficult to fully assess potential risks. With only 22 trials available, many of them small and uneven in their reporting, the overall evidence base remains limited.

“Intermittent fasting just doesn’t seem to work for overweight or obese adults trying to lose weight,” said Luis Garegnani, lead author of the review from the Universidad Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires Cochrane Associate Centre.

Social Media Hype vs Scientific Evidence

Garegnani cautioned that online enthusiasm may be running ahead of the data. “Intermittent fasting may be a reasonable option for some people, but the current evidence doesn’t justify the enthusiasm we see on social media.”

Another concern is the lack of long term research. Few studies have examined how well intermittent fasting works over extended periods. “Obesity is a chronic condition. Short-term trials make it difficult to guide long-term decision-making for patients and clinicians,” Garegnani added.

Most of the trials included primarily white participants from high income countries. Because obesity is increasing rapidly in low and middle income nations, more research is needed in these populations.

The authors emphasize that the findings may not apply equally to everyone. Results could differ based on sex, age, ethnic background, medical conditions, or existing eating disorders or behaviors.

“With the current evidence available, it’s hard to make a general recommendation,” said Eva Madrid, senior author from Cochrane Evidence Synthesis Unit Iberoamerica. “Doctors will need to take a case-by-case approach when advising an overweight adult on losing weight.”

Share Button

Woman’s leg amputated after botched knee op

The patient was the victim of a “life-changing error” when a drill slipped during surgery.

Share Button

Ancient microbes may have used oxygen 500 million years before it filled Earth’s atmosphere

Today, oxygen is essential to life and constantly present in the air we breathe. But for most of Earth’s early history, that was not true. Oxygen did not become a stable part of the atmosphere until about 2.3 billion years ago, during a transformative period known as the Great Oxidation Event (GOE). That shift permanently altered the planet and paved the way for oxygen breathing organisms to evolve and thrive.

Now, researchers at MIT report evidence that some forms of life may have learned to use oxygen hundreds of millions of years before the GOE. Their findings could represent some of the earliest signs of aerobic respiration on Earth.

In research published in Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, MIT geobiologists investigated the origins of a crucial enzyme that allows organisms to consume oxygen. This enzyme is present in most aerobic, oxygen breathing life today. The team determined that it first evolved during the Mesoarchean, a geological era that occurred hundreds of millions of years before the Great Oxidation Event.

Their results may help answer a long standing mystery in Earth’s history. If oxygen producing microbes appeared so early, why did it take so long for oxygen to accumulate in the atmosphere?

Cyanobacteria and Early Oxygen Production

The first known oxygen producers were cyanobacteria. These microbes developed the ability to harness sunlight and water through photosynthesis, releasing oxygen as a byproduct. Scientists estimate that cyanobacteria emerged around 2.9 billion years ago. That means they were likely generating oxygen for hundreds of millions of years before the Great Oxidation Event.

So what happened to all that early oxygen?

Researchers have long suspected that chemical reactions with rocks removed much of it from the environment. The new MIT study suggests living organisms may also have been consuming it.

The team found evidence that certain microbes evolved the oxygen using enzyme long before the GOE. Organisms living near cyanobacteria could have used this enzyme to rapidly consume small amounts of oxygen as it was produced. If so, early life may have slowed the buildup of oxygen in the atmosphere for hundreds of millions of years.

“This does dramatically change the story of aerobic respiration,” says study co-author Fatima Husain, a postdoc in MIT’s Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences (EAPS). “Our study adds to this very recently emerging story that life may have used oxygen much earlier than previously thought. It shows us how incredibly innovative life is at all periods in Earth’s history.”

Other co-authors include Gregory Fournier, associate professor of geobiology at MIT, along with Haitao Shang and Stilianos Louca of the University of Oregon.

Tracing the Origins of Aerobic Respiration

This work builds on years of research at MIT aimed at reconstructing the history of oxygen on Earth. Previous studies helped establish that cyanobacteria began producing oxygen around 2.9 billion years ago, while oxygen did not permanently accumulate in the atmosphere until roughly 2.33 billion years ago during the Great Oxidation Event.

For Husain and her colleagues, that long gap raised an important question.

“We know that the microorganisms that produce oxygen were around well before the Great Oxidation Event,” Husain says. “So it was natural to ask, was there any life around at that time that could have been capable of using that oxygen for aerobic respiration?”

If some organisms were already using oxygen, even in small amounts, they might have helped keep atmospheric levels low for a significant stretch of time.

To explore this idea, the researchers focused on heme copper oxygen reductases. These enzymes are essential for aerobic respiration because they convert oxygen into water. They are found in most oxygen breathing organisms today, from bacteria to humans.

“We targeted the core of this enzyme for our analyses because that’s where the reaction with oxygen is actually taking place,” Husain explains.

Mapping Enzymes on the Tree of Life

The team set out to determine when this enzyme first appeared. They identified its genetic sequence and then searched massive genome databases containing millions of species to find matching sequences.

“The hardest part of this work was that we had too much data,” Fournier says. “This enzyme is just everywhere and is present in most modern living organism. So we had to sample and filter the data down to a dataset that was representative of the diversity of modern life and also small enough to do computation with, which is not trivial.”

After narrowing the data to several thousand species, the researchers placed the enzyme sequences onto an evolutionary tree of life. This allowed them to estimate when different branches emerged.

When fossil evidence existed for a particular organism, the scientists used its estimated age to anchor that branch of the tree. By applying multiple fossil based time points, they refined their estimates for when the enzyme evolved.

Their analysis traced the enzyme back to the Mesoarchean, which spanned from 3.2 to 2.8 billion years ago. The researchers believe this is when the enzyme, and the ability to use oxygen, first arose. That timeframe predates the Great Oxidation Event by several hundred million years.

The findings suggest that soon after cyanobacteria began producing oxygen, other organisms evolved the machinery to consume it. Microbes living near cyanobacteria could have quickly absorbed the oxygen being released. In doing so, these early aerobic organisms may have helped prevent oxygen from accumulating in the atmosphere for hundreds of millions of years.

“Considered all together, MIT research has filled in the gaps in our knowledge of how Earth’s oxygenation proceeded,” Husain says. “The puzzle pieces are fitting together and really underscore how life was able to diversify and live in this new, oxygenated world.”

This research was supported, in part, by the Research Corporation for Science Advancement Scialog program.

Share Button