BBC Panorama has seen documents and spoken to former midwives from Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust.
Category Archives: Wellness Live
Daily pill doubles survival time for pancreatic cancer patients
The drug, daraxonrasib, has been hailed as a breakthrough in managing the deadliest of all the major cancers.
Checks reveal young women with deadly ‘silent’ heart risk
Sudden cardiac death can happen without warning, and it’s not just a problem for sporty young men, say experts.
Nicola Sturgeon: ‘I’m Serving A Sentence For A Crime I Did Not Commit’

Nicola Sturgeon has told the BBC she is “serving a sentence for a crime I did not commit” in relation to her ex-husband’s embezzlement of SNP funds.
Peter Murrell, chief executive of the Scottish National Party between 2001 and 2023, pleaded guilty to taking more than £400,000 from the SNP this week.
Advertisement
He has been charged with embezzling funds from the party between August 2010 and October 2022.
Arrested in 2023 and charged in 2024, Murrell has been remanded in custody and is set to be sentenced at the end of June.
He made a series of extravagant purchases while he was SNP chief, including a £124,550 campervan for his own personal use.
His then-wife Sturgeon was also arrested in 2024 and questioned by detectives, but was never charged with any offences.
Advertisement
The former first minister of Scotland and ex-SNP leader has faced a barrage of criticism after she claimed she was completely unaware of her then-spouse Peter Murrell’s crimes.
Speaking to the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg, Sturgeon said: “A lot of women find themselves blamed for the men of the actions in their lives – I’m not going to contribute to that in a sense that I am responsible for somebody else’s crimes.”
She added: “I believe strongly in that accountability, but I am not responsible for the crimes my former husband committed and I’m not going to apologise for somebody else’s crimes.”
Advertisement
But BBC presenter Kuenssberg pointed out that Sturgeon was still leader of the party when Murrell was taking funds from the party, and asked if she therefore beared responsibility.
“He perpetrated a crime on the SNP,” the ex-first minister said. “By definition, that includes me as party leader.
“He misled, he deceived. He is serving and will be serving a sentence for a crime he committed.
“I’m out here, feeling as if I’m serving a sentence for a crime I did not commit.”
Asked why she only gave “no comment” responses to the police when she was arrested, Sturgeon said: “I was in a state of near collapse. I was terrified, I was bewildered, I was in a state of high stress and anxiety.”
Advertisement
She said her lawyer told her not to answer questions “in such a state of stress”, and that she prepared a detailed statement afterwards.
Sturgeon also insisted she was unaware that her husband had bought the campervan.
“My mother and father’s house has a driveway in front where we would park our car and then we would go into the house,” she said.
Advertisement
“Where the motorhome was was round the side of the house, which was not immediately visible in the way that we went into the house.”
She said: “I genuinely, genuinely, don’t have any conscious memory of seeing that motorhome.
“If I saw it I probably would have assumed it was a neighbour’s. My mother and father-in-law were in their mid-80s, it wouldn’t have crossed my mind that it was theirs and why would it have crossed my mind that it was the SNP’s, that Peter had bought it?”
She said it was “never” discussed, adding: “I genuinely do not recall seeing it in a way that I registered it and thought, ‘oh there’s a motorhome’.”
Advertisement
Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Top Tory Humiliated With Brutal Makerfield Poll Putting Conservatives In Last Place
A senior Conservative was left red-faced on Sunday when presented with the results of an opinion poll of the Makerfield voters.
Sky News presenter Trevor Phillips showed shadow home secretary Chris Philp the findings from a Survation survey of 369 people set to vote in the crunch by-election.
Advertisement
The graph showed put the Conservatives in last place on 2% in the constituency.
The Green Party were just in front on 3%, the Liberal Democrats on 4%, Restore Britain on 7%, Reform UK on 40% and Labour in the lead on 43%.
Phillips said: “Before 2024, you used to come second between 20 and 30% of the vote.
“Now there are three parties that could describe themselves as being of the right, or centre right, and you – you’re the official opposition – you’re the least popular of the three!
“Reform, Restore, Conservatives.”
Pointing to the graph, he said: “Look, there are the Tories, down there at the bottom. What the heck happened?”
Advertisement

The Tory MP replied: “By-elections are very strange things. You’ve got this weird dynamic where Andy Burnham is running as a Labour candidate to basically kick out Keir Starmer.
“So this by-election is idiosyncratic, it’s incredibly unusual.”
Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham is hoping to win the Makerfield seat so he can challenge the prime minister’s leadership.
Advertisement
Phillips said: “But people of the right aren’t going to you. They’re going to Reform, they’re going to Restore, which is a party almost nobody has even heard of.
“They are polling better than you are! What has happened to the Tories?”
“Let’s just see what the actual result says,” Philp replied, claiming this was “just one little poll in one constituency in very unusual circumstances”.
He said: “If you take the [national] polls as a whole, we’re often in second place, Kemi is rated as the best leader and you can see that we’re the only party holding the failing Labour Party to account.”
Advertisement
Philp also noted that it takes time to “rebuild trust” with the public following their unpopular 14-year stint in government.
Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Intermittent fasting triggers surprising changes in the brain

More than one billion people worldwide now live with obesity, a condition that raises the risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and several types of cancer. Yet losing weight and keeping it off can be extremely difficult. The body does not simply respond to fewer calories in a straightforward way. Signals from the gut, hormones, metabolism, and the brain can all influence hunger, cravings, and weight regain.
One approach that has drawn growing interest is intermittent energy restriction (IER), a form of dieting in which periods of reduced calorie intake are followed by periods of more typical eating. Research published in 2023 suggests that this strategy may do more than reduce body weight. It may also shift the relationship between gut bacteria and brain activity in ways that are closely tied to appetite and food behavior.
“Here we show that an IER diet changes the human brain-gut-microbiome axis. The observed changes in the gut microbiome and in the activity in addition-related brain regions during and after weight loss are highly dynamic and coupled over time,” said last author Dr. Qiang Zeng, a researcher at the Health Management Institute of the PLA General Hospital in Beijing.
Intermittent fasting and the brain
To explore what happens inside the body during weight loss, the researchers studied 25 adults with obesity in China. The volunteers, who were about 27 years old on average, had a BMI between 28 and 45.
The team used several tools to track changes over time. Stool samples were analyzed with metagenomics to measure the composition of the gut microbiome. Blood tests were used to monitor metabolic and physiological changes. The researchers also used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine activity in brain regions involved in appetite, emotion, attention, learning, inhibition, and reward.
“A healthy, balanced gut microbiome is critical for energy homeostasis and maintaining normal weight. In contrast, an abnormal gut microbiome can change our eating behavior by affecting certain brain area involved in addiction,” explained coauthor Dr. Yongli Li from the Department of Health Management of Henan Provincial People’s Hospital in Henan, China.
A carefully controlled weight loss program
The study began with a 32 day high controlled fasting phase. During this period, participants received meals designed by a dietitian. Their calorie intake was gradually reduced in steps until it reached about one quarter of their basic energy needs.
This was followed by a 30 day low controlled fasting phase. During this stage, participants were given a list of recommended foods rather than fully prepared meals. Those who followed the plan exactly would consume 500 calories per day for women and 600 calories per day for men.
By the end of the intervention, participants had lost an average of 7.6 kilograms, equal to about 7.8% of their starting body weight. They also had reductions in body fat and waist circumference.
The metabolic improvements extended beyond weight. Blood pressure fell, as did fasting plasma glucose, total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, and the activity of key liver enzymes. According to the researchers, these changes suggest that intermittent energy restriction may help reduce obesity related problems such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and liver dysfunction.
Brain and gut changes moved together
The researchers found that the weight loss program was linked to lower activity in several brain regions involved in appetite and addiction related behavior. These changes may help explain why dieting affects not only body size, but also food cravings, self control, and the drive to eat.
At the same time, the gut microbiome shifted. The abundance of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Parabacteroides distasonis, and Bacterokles uniformis rose sharply. Escherichia coli decreased.
Further analysis suggested that certain microbes were connected with activity in specific brain areas. The abundance of E. coli, Coprococcus comes, and Eubacterium hallii was negatively associated with activity in the brain’s left orbital inferior frontal gyrus, a region involved in executive function and willpower during weight loss.
Other bacteria showed the opposite pattern. P. distasonis and Flavonifractor plautii were positively linked with brain regions involved in attention, motor inhibition, emotion, and learning.
These findings point to a striking possibility: as people lose weight, the gut microbiome and the brain may change together. The study cannot prove whether gut bacteria drive the brain changes, whether the brain drives microbial changes, or whether another factor influences both. Still, the results add to evidence that weight control is not just a matter of willpower or calories. It may involve a changing biological conversation between the gut and the brain.
A two way conversation inside the body
“The gut microbiome is thought to communicate with the brain in a complex, two-directional way. The microbiome produces neurotransmitters and neurotoxins which access the brain through nerves and the blood circulation. In return the brain controls eating behavior, while nutrients from our diet change the composition of the gut microbiome,” said coauthor Dr. Xiaoning Wang from the Institute of Geriatrics of the PLA General Hospital.
This two way communication may help explain why obesity is so difficult to treat. Hunger, cravings, mood, reward, and metabolism are all shaped by biological signals. The gut microbiome can produce compounds that influence inflammation, metabolism, and nervous system activity. The brain, in turn, helps regulate food choices and eating behavior.
The 2023 findings suggest that successful weight loss may involve changes across this entire system rather than in one isolated organ.
What later research adds
Research published after the 2023 study has continued to support the idea that fasting can influence the gut microbiome, although the evidence remains complex. A 2024 systematic review of human studies found that intermittent fasting appears to affect gut microbial richness, diversity, and composition. However, the authors also noted that results varied widely between studies, and more research is needed to determine which changes are truly beneficial for health.
Another 2024 clinical study compared intermittent fasting combined with protein pacing to continuous calorie restriction in adults with overweight or obesity. Both diets reduced calorie intake, but the fasting and protein pacing group showed greater weight loss and more pronounced shifts in the gut microbiome. The researchers reported increases in microbes and metabolic signals associated with improved body composition and fat loss.
Together, these later findings strengthen the broader picture: fasting based interventions may reshape the gut microbiome in meaningful ways. However, they also show that the details matter. The type of fasting, calorie intake, protein intake, fiber intake, meal timing, and individual biology may all influence the outcome.
The next question for weight loss research
The original 2023 study was small and correlational, so it cannot show cause and effect. It also focused on a specific group of participants and a short term intervention. Larger and longer studies will be needed to determine whether certain microbes or brain regions can reliably predict who will lose weight, who will keep it off, and which diets work best for different people.
Coauthor Dr. Liming Wang, likewise from the Health Management Institute in Beijing, said: “The next question to be answered is the precise mechanism by which the gut microbiome and the brain communicate in obese people, including during weight loss. What specific gut microbiome and brain regions are critical for successful weight loss and maintaining a healthy weight?”
For now, the research offers a more detailed view of what may happen during intermittent fasting. Weight loss may not be limited to shrinking fat stores. It may also involve a synchronized shift in gut bacteria, metabolism, and brain activity that changes how the body responds to food.
‘What Is Wrong With Labour?’ Trevor Phillips Scorches Minister Over Glaring Issue Within Party

Sky News’ Trevor Phillips asked a senior minister what is “wrong” with Labour as he tore into the party’s lack of female leaders.
Labour is currently in turmoil as speculation of a coup mounts.
Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham is campaigning as the party’s candidate in the Makerfield by-election.
Advertisement
If he wins and becomes an MP, he is expected to challenge Keir Starmer’s leadership, sparking a contest which ex-health secretary Wes Streeting has already vowed to join.
Senior female party figures, like former deputy prime minister Angela Rayner, are yet to say if they would partake in any leadership race.
Interviewing work and pensions secretary Pat McFadden on Sky News, Phillips said: “There’s a shadow contest going on. The Labour Party’s not going to have a female leader. It’s bizarre.
Advertisement
“This is not something you could say of any self-democratic party, most of the centre-right parties in Europe [have had a female leader] – the Tories have had four!
“Genuinely, what is about the Labour Party that makes it, as far as I can see, incapable of having a serious female contender for leadership?”
McFadden said that was a “good and serious point”, though he rejected claims there was any contest coming on right now as no one has formally challenged the prime minister.
Advertisement
But he added: “If there is a contest, then why should it just be with the people who so far have been mentioned?”
Phillips said: “What’s wrong with the Labour Party?”
“The Labour Party’s not perfect, like any other organisation,” McFadden replied. “There are wonderful women politicians in the Labour Party, many of them are capable of leadership, and if we ever are in a position of a contest, why wouldn’t they put themselves forward?”
Phillips’ question comes after Jess Phillips told the Hay festival this week that her party is sexist for having no permanent female leaders in its history.
Advertisement
The MP for Birmingham Yardley, who resigned as the minister for safeguarding and violence against women and girls earlier this month, said: “Like all institutions [Labour] is a bit sexist”.
She added that “every institution that every single person in this room works for is led by the patriarchy”.
However, she disputed the idea that just having a woman in power would improve the UK.
“I have to say, the idea that a woman leads and it makes it better for women is not one that I’ve recognised in this country,” she said.
Advertisement
“My mortgage went up by a thousand pounds a month, cheers Liz [Truss]. I shouted at her, every time I saw her, the amount that she now owed me. She has not paid me back.”
Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Why renaming my health condition could help other women
Rochelle Lewis is among more than 170 million woman globally to be diagnosed with PCOS.
Omega-3 fish oil shows promise against type 2 diabetes

Fish oil may have a surprising role in the fight against insulin resistance, especially in a form of type 2 diabetes that is often overlooked. A Brazilian study published in Nutrients found that omega-3 fatty acids from fish oil reduced glucose intolerance and weakened insulin resistance in rats that were not obese but showed a diabetes-like metabolic condition.
The work was funded by FAPESP and focused on Goto-Kakizaki rats, a well established animal model used to study non-obese type 2 diabetes. Type 2 diabetes is marked by high blood sugar that occurs when insulin, the hormone that helps move glucose from the blood into cells, does not work effectively.
Fish Oil and Insulin Resistance
Omega-3 supplements, including fish oil, are often used by people with cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. However, scientists still know much less about how these fatty acids affect insulin resistance when obesity is not involved.
That question matters because obesity is one of the strongest risk factors for type 2 diabetes, but it is not the whole story. An estimated 10% to 20% of people with type 2 diabetes worldwide are not obese. For these patients, the biological roots of insulin resistance may differ from the better known obesity-linked pathways.
In the study, researchers gave the rats fish oil at a dose of 2 grams per kilogram of body weight (equivalent to 540 mg/g of eicosapentaenoic acid, or EPA, and 100 mg/g of docosahexaenoic acid, or DHA) three times weekly for eight weeks. By the end of the experiment, the treated animals showed lower insulin resistance, better blood sugar control, reduced inflammatory markers, and improvements in several lipid measures, including total cholesterol, LDL (“bad cholesterol”) and triglycerides.
The results came from preclinical experiments, so they do not prove that fish oil will have the same effects in people. Still, the findings point to inflammation as a powerful target in non-obese diabetes and suggest that omega-3 fatty acids deserve closer study in this group.
A Shift in Immune Cells
“Our experiments involved Goto-Kakizaki [GK] rats, an animal model for non-obese type 2 diabetes. We found that insulin resistance can be reduced in these animals by modulating the inflammatory response so as to change the profile of defense cells [lymphocytes] from a pro-inflammatory state to an anti-inflammatory state. This process parallels the response of obese individuals with insulin resistance to omega-3 fatty acid supplementation,” said Rui Curi, Director of Butantan Institute’s Education Center, Professor of Interdisciplinary Graduate Studies in Health Sciences at Cruzeiro do Sul University (UNICSUL), and coordinator of the study.
Lymphocytes are white blood cells that help direct the adaptive immune response. When their behavior changes, the effects can spread through the immune system and influence other cells involved in inflammation.
“In previous studies, we observed alterations in both lymphocytes and macrophages [large white blood cells that often reside in adipose tissue and are part of the innate immune system, engulfing and destroying pathogens] in non-obese rats with insulin resistance. In such cases, these cells produce more pro-inflammatory cytokines, as is central in obese people with diabetes,” Curi explained.
“The main aim of the study, therefore, was to find out whether supplementation with fish oil [rich in omega-3] could reverse specific alterations in lymphocytes that had been observed in previous research. Our findings increased our knowledge of the link between inflammation and insulin resistance in non-obese animals, confirming that this is a key factor in diabetes even in the absence of obesity,” said Renata Gorjão, last author of the article, and Co-Director of UNICSUL’s Program of Graduate Studies in Health Sciences.
Inflammation Without Obesity
The Nutrients study, conducted during the PhD candidacy of Tiago Bertola Lobato, was part of a broader FAPESP-supported project exploring how insulin resistance develops in non-obese animals.
Curi noted that obesity is a major diabetes risk factor, but not the only one. In people who develop diabetes without obesity, one leading hypothesis is that genetic factors may play an important role. In another study published in Cells, Curi, Gorjão, and colleagues investigated whether delayed intestinal transit might also contribute to insulin resistance in non-obese individuals.
“Most obese people have chronic low-level inflammation, which is known to affect the insulin signaling pathways. Adipose tissue, which is augmented in obesity, releases pro-inflammatory cytokines that affect the insulin signaling pathways, promoting insulin resistance. In the non-obese model, this impactful characteristic of adipose tissue is absent, but systemic inflammation is present,” Curi said.
The group had previously shown systemic inflammation in non-obese GK rats with insulin resistance in a study published in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.
Another paper from the same project reported that anti-inflammatory defenses appear to break down early in non-obese GK rats with insulin resistance. Lymph nodes (part of the immune system) from newly weaned 21-day-old GK pups already showed reduced markers of regulatory T-cells (Tregs, cells with anti-inflammatory characteristics). The researchers also detected other early inflammatory changes. That work was published in FEBS Letters, a journal of the Federation of European Biochemical Societies.
How Omega-3s May Help
The Nutrients study suggests that fish oil may work by moving immune activity away from a damaging inflammatory pattern and toward a more protective one.
“Fish oil supplementation reversed this pro-inflammatory profile, displaying a significant anti-inflammatory effect and reducing polarization of Th1 and Th17 cells [lymphocyte subtypes that perform crucial functions in inflammation], followed by a rise in the percentage of Tregs, which can inhibit the activation of pro-inflammatory lymphocytes. Thus the action of omega-3 fatty acids on lymphocytes, modulating them from a pro-inflammatory state to an anti-inflammatory state, may have triggered the reduction in insulin resistance in these animals,” Lobato said.
That immune shift is important because insulin resistance is not only a problem of sugar metabolism. It is also deeply connected to inflammation. When inflammatory signals remain elevated, they can interfere with insulin signaling and make it harder for cells to respond to the hormone.
The study adds to a growing view of type 2 diabetes as a disease shaped by both metabolism and the immune system. In this case, fish oil appeared to improve blood sugar regulation not simply by changing fat levels, but by changing the inflammatory environment that helps drive insulin resistance.
What Later Studies Add
Since the Nutrients paper was published, related human research has continued to examine how omega-3 fatty acids may influence early diabetes risk and metabolic health.
A 2025 double blind randomized controlled trial in Food and Function tested fish oil supplementation in healthy middle aged and older adults. Over 12 weeks, the fish oil groups had dose related increases in serum EPA and DHA. The researchers also reported decreases in fasting insulin and the HOMA-IR index, a common marker of insulin resistance. Fasting blood glucose trended downward across groups, and several lipid related measures also improved.
Another 2024 analysis in Nutrition and Diabetes used modeling data from 161 patients with type 2 diabetes to explore the relationship between omega-3 levels and HbA1c, a longer term marker of blood sugar control. The authors reported a dose related association and proposed that omega-3 intake could be studied in a more individualized way, while also noting that the role of omega-3s in type 2 diabetes remains debated.
Together, these studies do not settle the question of whether fish oil should be used to manage diabetes. Human evidence remains mixed, and the Brazilian study was conducted in animals, not people. However, the newer findings are consistent with the idea that omega-3 fatty acids may affect insulin resistance and inflammation in ways worth testing more carefully.
More Research Still Needed
Despite the promising findings, the researchers stressed that the results should be interpreted cautiously. Animal studies are useful for uncovering biological mechanisms, but clinical trials are needed before scientists can know whether the same strategy works in people with non-obese type 2 diabetes.
“These studies involved well-established experimental models that mimic insulin resistance in non-obese individuals. Trials in humans are needed to estimate the ideal dose and the most indicated type of omega-3 fatty acid,” Curi said.
For now, the study offers a compelling clue: in diabetes, body weight may not be the only driver of insulin resistance. Inflammation can play a central role even without obesity, and fish oil may help reveal how that hidden process can be changed.
Millions of breast cancer patients could safely avoid chemotherapy, study suggests
A new DNA test could help screen whether patients require the treatment or not, according to a new international trial.




