Chalky, Sandy, Clay: The Best Plants For Every Type Of Soil

It’s one thing running a garden on well-aerated (but never dusty), easily compacted (but not too heavy) soil.

But it’s rare that the stars perfectly align; the UK’s soil, which is increasingly degrading, may run a little too chalky or clay-heavy in your backyard.

Here, we’ll share the types of soil in the UK and the best plants for each of them.

What types of soil are there?

The main types of soil in the UK are:

  • Chalky,
  • Clay,
  • Loamy,
  • Peaty,
  • Sandy,
  • Silty.

The type of soil is determined by its particle size. Clay particles are less than 0.002mm; silt is 0.002-0.05mm; sand is 0.05-2mm, and stones are larger than 2mm.

Most soil is a combination of different soil particles.

Which soil do I have?

To count as a “clay” soil, the earth has to contain 25% or more clay particles. These are fertile, but drain slowly and can be compacted quite easily; they take a long time to warm up, and may “bake” in summer. They get sticky when wet.

Chalky soils tend to be stony as they often lie over a limestone bedrock. They usually drain quite freely and are typically alkaline. If your soil froths when you put it in a jar of vinegar, it’s probably high in chalk.

Sandy soils retain little moisture, which is great for draining after rain but a little tougher to work with during hot weather. They feel gritty to the touch.

Loamy soils are often considered “the perfect soil type” as they contain a mixture of clay, sand, and silt. That makes them easy to work with and able to hold on to water without running waterlogged. They’re usually high in nutrients.

Peaty soils can be acidic and hold a lot of water, though they’re also high in nutrients. They’re not usually found in gardens, though.

And silty soils, while easily compacted, usually drain well and are quite fertile. They typically have medium-sized particles, which help them to retain moisture. They rarely clump and feel a little slippery.

Soil-testing kits can help you work out the nutrient content of your soil.

What are the best plant types for each soil?

Some examples include:

1) Clay soils

  • Roses
  • Hydrangea
  • Hardy geraniums
  • Mahonia
  • Foxglove
  • Tomato
  • Cabbage
  • Squash
  • Green beans
  • Lettuce.

2) Chalky soils

  • Geranium
  • Clematis
  • Lavender
  • Yarrow
  • Rosemary
  • Globe thistle
  • Crab apple trees.

3) Loamy soils

  • Wisteria
  • Geranium
  • Day lily
  • Dogwood
  • Summer bulbs
  • Roses
  • Peony
  • Tomato
  • Lettuce
  • Carrots
  • Beans
  • Cucumbers
  • Strawberries.

4) Peaty soils

  • Rhododendrons
  • Azaleas
  • Heather
  • Magnolias
  • Brassicas
  • Radishes
  • Potatoes.

5) Sandy soils

  • Tulips
  • Lavender
  • Buddleja
  • Hardy fuchsia
  • Carrot
  • Courgette
  • Alliums
  • Radishes.

6) Silty soils

  • Willows
  • Ferns
  • Dogwoods
  • Astilbe
  • Cistus
  • Lettuce
  • Chard
  • Green beans.

What if my soil is new and/or very shallow?

Wildflowers do exceptionally well on very new, thin soil, gardener and writer Arthur Parkinson previously told HuffPost UK.

“Perennial wildflowers like ox-eye daisy you can sow onto very poor soils, and they will establish well from being sown in the early autumn. Annual chamomile and cornfield poppies will thrive too if their seed is sown in spring,” he said.

Share Button

After 20 years, scientists finally explain the Crab Pulsar’s strange “zebra stripes”

For more than 20 years, astronomers have been puzzled by a striking pattern of bright, evenly spaced stripes in the radio waves coming from the Crab Pulsar, the dense remnant of a supernova recorded by Chinese and Japanese astronomers in 1054.

In 2024, a theoretical astrophysicist at the University of Kansas proposed a solution that explained much of this unusual “zebra” pattern. Now, with a refined analysis, he has identified gravity’s lensing effect as the final missing ingredient needed to fully explain the phenomenon.

“Gravity changes the shape of spacetime,” said Mikhail Medvedev, KU professor of physics & astronomy, who will present his findings at the American Physical Society’s 2026 Global Physics Summit taking place March 15-20 at the Colorado Convention Center in Denver.

An associated paper, accepted by the peer-reviewed Journal of Plasma Physics, currently is available on the pre-print site arXiv.

“Light doesn’t travel in a straight line in a gravitational field because space itself is curved,” he said. “What would be straight in flat spacetime becomes curved in the presence of strong gravity. In that sense, gravity acts as a lens in curved spacetime.”

Gravity and Plasma Create a Unique Cosmic Tug-of-War

While gravitational lensing is well known in studies of black holes, Medvedev says this is the first observed case where both gravity and plasma work together to shape a signal detected from space.

“In black hole images, gravity alone shapes the structure,” he said. “In the Crab Pulsar, both gravity and plasma act together. This represents the first real-world application of this combined effect.”

The Crab Pulsar sits at the center of the Crab Nebula in the Perseus Arm of the Milky Way, about 6,500 light-years from Earth. Its relatively close distance and clear visibility make it a key object for studying neutron stars, supernova remnants, and nebulae.

A Strange Signal Unlike Any Other Pulsar

Medvedev describes the pulsar’s signal as highly unusual. Instead of a continuous spectrum like sunlight, which spreads smoothly across all colors, the Crab Pulsar produces distinct, separated bands.

“There’s a remarkable pattern in Pulsar’s spectrum,” Medvedev said. “Unlike ordinary broad spectra — such as sunlight, which contains a continuous range of colors — the Crab’s high-frequency inter-pulse shows discrete spectral bands. If it were a rainbow, it’s as if only specific ‘colors’ appear, with nothing in between.”

Most pulsars emit radio waves that are noisy and spread out across frequencies. The Crab Pulsar stands apart with sharply defined stripes separated by complete darkness.

“The stripes are absolutely distinct with complete darkness between them,” Medvedev said. “There’s a bright band, then nothing, bright band, nothing. No other pulsar shows this kind of striation. That uniqueness made the Crab Pulsar especially interesting — and challenging — to understand.”

Gravity Provides the Missing Piece

Earlier versions of Medvedev’s model could reproduce the striped pattern, but they failed to match the strong contrast seen in real observations. His research showed that plasma around the pulsar bends and spreads electromagnetic waves through diffraction, helping form the pattern.

Now, by adding Einstein’s theory of gravity into the model, he has accounted for the missing contrast.

“The previous theoretical model could reproduce stripes, but not with the observed contrast. The inclusion of gravity provides the missing piece,” Medvedev said. “The plasma in the pulsar’s magnetosphere can be thought of as a lens — but a defocusing lens. Gravity, by contrast, acts as a focusing lens. Plasma tends to spread light rays apart; gravity pulls them inward. When these two effects are superimposed, there are specific paths where they compensate each other.”

Interference Patterns Produce the Zebra Stripes

The interaction between plasma and gravity creates multiple paths for the pulsar’s radio waves. When these paths align, the waves can either reinforce or cancel each other, forming a pattern of bright and dark bands.

The KU researcher said the combination of a defocusing magnetospheric plasma and a focusing gravity create in-phase and out-of-phase interference bands of radio-wave intensity that appear as the Crab Pulsar’s zebra stripes.

“By symmetry, there are at least two such paths for the light,” he said. “When two nearly identical paths bring light to the observer, they form an interferometer. The signals combine. At some frequencies, they reinforce each other (in phase), producing bright bands. At others, they cancel (out of phase), producing darkness. That is the essence of the interference pattern.”

A New Tool for Studying Neutron Stars

Medvedev believes the core mechanism behind the zebra stripes is now largely understood, though further refinements may improve precision.

“There appears to be little additional physics required to explain the stripes qualitatively,” Medvedev said. “Quantitatively, there may be refinements. For example, the current treatment includes gravity in a static, lowest-order approximation. The pulsar is rotating, and including rotational effects could introduce quantitative changes, though not qualitative ones.”

This new model could give scientists a powerful way to study rotating gravitational systems and better understand pulsars, which are typically difficult to visualize directly. It may also help map how matter is distributed around neutron stars and even offer clues about their internal structure through their gravitational effects.

Share Button

Popular sugar substitute linked to brain damage and stroke risk

From low-carb ice cream and keto protein bars to “sugar-free” soda, erythritol has become a staple ingredient in many modern foods.

However, new research from the University of Colorado Boulder suggests this widely used sugar substitute may have serious downsides. Scientists found it can affect brain cells in ways that may increase the risk of stroke.

The findings were published in the Journal of Applied Physiology.

“Our study adds to the evidence suggesting that non-nutritive sweeteners that have generally been purported to be safe, may not come without negative health consequences,” said senior author Christopher DeSouza, professor of integrative physiology and director of the Integrative Vascular Biology Lab.

What Is Erythritol and Why Is It So Popular?

Erythritol was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2001. It is a sugar alcohol typically made by fermenting corn and is now used in hundreds of food products. It contains almost no calories, delivers about 80% of the sweetness of regular sugar, and has little effect on insulin levels. Because of this, it is commonly used by people trying to lose weight, manage blood sugar, or reduce carbohydrate intake.

Still, growing research is raising questions about its safety.

A large study of 4,000 people in the U.S. and Europe found that individuals with higher levels of erythritol in their blood were much more likely to experience a heart attack or stroke within three years.

Inside the Study: Effects on Brain Blood Vessels

To better understand why this risk may exist, DeSouza and lead author Auburn Berry, a graduate student in his lab, examined how erythritol affects cells.

In their experiment, researchers exposed human cells that line blood vessels in the brain to an amount of erythritol similar to what is found in a typical sugar-free drink for three hours.

The results showed several concerning changes. The cells produced much less nitric oxide, which helps blood vessels relax and widen, and more endothelin-1, which causes vessels to tighten. When exposed to thrombin, a substance that promotes clotting, the cells had a reduced ability to produce t-PA, a natural compound that helps break down clots. In addition, the treated cells generated higher levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), also known as “free radicals,” which can damage cells, accelerate aging, and trigger inflammation.

Why These Changes Matter for Stroke Risk

“Big picture, if your vessels are more constricted and your ability to break down blood clots is lowered, your risk of stroke goes up,” said Berry. “Our research demonstrates not only that, but how erythritol has the potential to increase stroke risk.”

DeSouza pointed out that the study used only a single serving amount of erythritol. People who consume multiple servings daily could potentially face greater effects.

What Consumers Should Know

The researchers emphasize that their findings come from lab experiments on cells, not from studies in people, so more research is needed to confirm the risks in real-world settings.

Even so, DeSouza recommends paying closer attention to ingredient labels and watching for erythritol or “sugar alcohol.”

“Given the epidemiological study that inspired our work, and now our cellular findings, we believe it would be prudent for people to monitor their consumption of non-nutrient-sweeteners such as this one,” he said.

Share Button

The Reason(s) You Always Fall Asleep When You’re Watching TV Or A Movie

If you’re like most people, you’ve probably drifted off to sleep as soon as you put on a movie or show at night.

It’s a common occurrence – you sit down with your partner to finally watch the season finale of the show everyone is talking about, only to fall asleep, jolt awake, pretend you didn’t fall asleep and keep on watching until you fall asleep again.

Sleep experts told HuffPost there are many reasons this happens, and some are more concerning than others. Here’s what to know:

When you’re watching TV or movies at night, you’re often in a good sleep environment.

“There’s a couple of environmental factors to the fact of watching TV, watching a movie that promotes sleepiness,” said Dr. Neal Walia, a sleep specialist at UCLA Health in California. “When you wake up in the morning, you develop something called a sleep drive, which is how much your body wants to sleep.”

As you go about your day, your sleep drive goes up before peaking at bedtime, he explained. “And that drive is what gets you into sleep and carries you to sleep,” Walia noted.

“Usually, people are watching movies and TV in the evening after a long workday. This is when their sleep drive is at the highest,” he said. So your body naturally wants to sleep at this time.

“And then sometimes it’s just a lack of stimulation,” said Dr. Molly Atwood, the director of clinical training in the behavioural sleep medicine program at Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore.

If you find yourself feeling tired throughout the day, you may notice that your fatigue disappears when you interact with something, whether that’s scrolling on your phone or getting up to make dinner.

Why? “Your body has a system of overcoming whatever sleepiness you have with stimuli,” according to Walia. And watching TV and or a movie is, generally, a low-stimuli activity, he noted. TikTok or even a task like folding laundry are more high-stimuli.

“If you’re lying down, it is dark – so your body’s kind of getting that signal that it’s nighttime and if the movie is not very stimulating or boring, it might be a lot easier, too, for any sleepiness that is there to take over,” Atwood added.

“Another big thing is that, especially patients with insomnia, a lot of times what they’ll say to me is ‘I just can’t turn my brain off.’ And most of our day, our attention is preoccupied by something – probably a screen, most likely – but something is taking our attention away,” Walia said.

We don’t often just sit with our thoughts. That is, until we drift off to sleep at the end of the day. And if you’re stressed about work or anxious about money, sitting with your thoughts can make it difficult to fall asleep.

“But if you’re watching something like a show, you’re not really in your own head for the most part,” Walia said. Your attention is drawn to the show or movie you’re watching, not the taxes you still need to do. This encourages your body to drift off to sleep.

Morning people are more likely to fall asleep while watching TV at night.

Your body’s natural circadian rhythm can play a role in whether you’re prone to falling asleep on the couch or not.

“In some circumstances, if you’re more of a morning person, your body naturally makes you alert early in the morning and it shuts down alertness early at night,” Atwood said.

Folks in this group are just naturally more tired at night. For morning people, their body is giving them signals that it’s time for bed, which makes it more likely that they’ll drift off while watching TV.

It’s also more common if you re-watch shows.

Many people turn on their comfort shows after a long day. And according to Atwood, it’s more likely that you’ll fall asleep during a show you’ve seen several times.

“Our nervous systems are super calm and comforted, versus like an action movie or a horror movie,” Atwood said.

You also don’t have to pay much attention to the show to know what’s going on, which allows your body to drift off easily, too.

If you regularly fall asleep during a movie or TV show and are getting enough sleep at night, it's worth talking to a doctor.

Olga Rolenko via Getty Images

If you regularly fall asleep during a movie or TV show and are getting enough sleep at night, it’s worth talking to a doctor.

Most people are also sleep-deprived, which makes it easy to fall asleep while watching TV.

“A lot of our population is sleep deprived,” said Walia, who explained that most people aren’t getting the seven to nine hours of sleep they need each night.

Everyone has different individual sleep needs. But no matter how much sleep your body requires, most folks aren’t getting it.

Because of busy days, family demands and high-stress jobs, you may not even notice you’re sleepy until you’re interacting with something that’s low-stimuli, like a movie. This is when your sleep deprivation can catch up with you and cause you to fall asleep.

Even people who sleep the recommended seven to nine hours a night may not be getting good quality sleep, which can also result in sleepiness on the couch.

“There’s many people out there with untreated or under-treated sleep disorders that disrupt the quality of sleep,” Walia said, adding that sleep apnea is one example of this.

If you fall asleep during a movie once in a while, there isn’t much cause for concern ― but if this is a regular habit, it’s worth evaluating your sleep.

It’s understandable if you fall asleep on the couch after a busy day of travel or after a late night out, but if you’re falling asleep in front of the TV frequently, you should take notice.

“If you’re sitting upright, the lights are on, it’s an engaging movie … and you still can’t keep yourself awake, that might be more of like, ‘OK, I should reevaluate how much sleep I’m getting overall,’” Atwood said.

If you think you’re getting enough sleep but still falling asleep during engaging shows and movies, it’s worth talking to a sleep specialist, she added. A professional can help test you for underlying conditions that could disrupt your sleep.

Being able to stay awake during movies and TV shows at night could be a sign of good sleep health.

If you can usually stay awake while watching TV or movies at night, it’s “probably a good indication that [you’re] not sleep deprived or they’re not having disruptions in their sleep,” Walia said.

This nighttime energy reflects relatively good sleep health, he added.

Some sleep disorders can keep people from napping or falling asleep during shows and movies, but, overall, if you are getting enough high-quality sleep, you likely have good sleep health, he said.

Share Button

I Wrote About My Choice To Be Child-Free. I Expected Some Strong Reactions – But Not This

The morning it went live, my alarm jolted me from sleep well before sunlight filled the sky. I grabbed my phone, swiped it open to see the headlines, and there, smack dab in the middle of my news feed, I saw my name. The day had hardly begun… and I was already trending.

I had revealed my most private feelings about my reproductive life and detailed how my choice not to have children was repeatedly called out in professional settings. I was confident that whether I had kids or not did not determine my worth as a person. In the 21st century, it should not be controversial to say that some women choose other paths. And, still, that morning, I was nervous about sharing all this in such a public way.

Those nerves only proved my social conditioning. Women without kids are still viewed within the context of rigid stereotypes. I was anxious about how my essay – and I – would be perceived, and I worried it wouldn’t be good.

Then something unexpected happened. I was inundated with messages. Over the next week, my Instagram, the essay’s comment section, and even my work email were flooded with a huge outpouring of gratitude and positivity. Women wrote to thank me for sharing what they felt but couldn’t vocalise, for helping dispel the myth that women without kids are selfish and cold, and for making it clear that women don’t need to apologise for choosing not to have children. More people felt like me than I ever would have guessed.

Most of these messages were from women who, like me, did not want to be mothers. Women who knew that their reproductive freedom was hard fought and well deserved, but still wrestled with strong societal expectations. Some of the messages I received, however, were from women with kids who wished they had been told at some point in their lives that they had other options. I even received notes from men who had witnessed their partners’ or wives’ value reduced to whether or not they were a mother. What united all of these people was a simple wish: for women to be valued beyond their reproductive choices.

I would be lying, though, if I said all the responses I received were positive. A proportion of these notes were filled with anger and resentment. A few of them even veered into harassment. Like the positive messages, these all had a unifying theme.

“You stupid idiot,” wrote one person, “will feminism take care of you when you’re old and dying?” Feminism, responses like these implied, was to blame for my decision to pursue a life as a successful surgeon, to follow the instincts that told me I did not want children of my own and that my life could be complete without motherhood.

The author, left, in the operating room.

Courtesy of Caitlin A. Smith

The author, left, in the operating room.

To some degree, I expected to receive messages like these from men, but I was surprised to find that many of the negative replies were, in fact, authored by women. They insisted my own take on my own life could not be trusted and that I was lying about feeling fulfilled. I would never be happy, they insisted, and never know true love or joy. My life would always be incomplete, they said, since I had been misled by a wolf in sheep’s clothing into a life without meaning. That wolf was, apparently, feminism.

These sentiments are not new, even if they have been emboldened by the current presidential administration. Feminism has long been a societal scapegoat. The wave of feminism championed by figures like Gloria Steinem encouraged women to free themselves of society’s expectation that all women must have children and stay in the kitchen. However, in recent years, this narrow definition has been heavily critiqued for the way it may appear to overlook and undervalue the labour involved in motherhood. This version of feminism has also estranged women from different backgrounds by centring the experiences and priorities of only white middle class women.

Women who find deep meaning in child rearing and significance in their work at home have felt alienated by mainstream versions of the movement. Some have even fled progressive politics because they found more alignment in conservative platforms, which often embrace domestic life and labour as a woman’s truest calling. There are even those who have argued that feminism has “ruined” motherhood by allowing women to pursue alternative paths in life and by encouraging the declining birth rate. Furthermore, the experiences, voices, and struggles of marginalised, non-white, and queer women have not always been included in the mission of some approaches to / forms of feminism, leaving many searching for alternative frameworks to fight for all women’s rights.

As the derogatory messages I received in my inbox show, the societal skepticism of women without children is not going anywhere, especially now that we have high-powered conservative think tanks pushing regressive gender roles and opposition to feminist movements. They, too, take the stance that feminism has damaged the traditional family structure by allowing women to believe their lives can be fulfilled without motherhood and marriage.

At the same time, conservatives like JD Vance, who is well known for his animosity towards single women without children, are using their large platforms to claim that women who pursue professional careers are causing social unrest.

Instead of addressing the real lack of support mothers face in this country, Trump is also making an explicit play to push motherhood on American women. Since my essay was published, we have seen proposals for a baby-bonus cash payout for new mothers, childbirth medals, and a federally funded tax-advantaged savings account seeded with $1,000 for any child born between 2025 and 2029, all aimed at selling women on partaking in a traditional nuclear-family lifestyle.

As a paediatric surgeon who helps children every day, I do not understand how I could be viewed as an enemy of the state. Unfortunately, I still see this belief play out – even at work.

In fact, a mother recently asked me a series of personal questions to suss out whether I was capable of performing her child’s routine surgery. After inquiring about my qualifications, she asked me directly whether I was a mother. “No,” I told her, and I asked her why she wanted to know. After a bit of rambling, she concluded with an unconvincing apology, noting, “But I think women should be able to do all kinds of jobs… or whatever.”

I don’t mind questions, and I understand parents put a huge amount of trust in their children’s doctors, especially when it comes to surgery. However, this specific encounter was yet another reminder that even a woman’s value in professional settings can be tied back to their reproductive choices.

I knew a question like this didn’t belong in that hospital exam room and had nothing to do with my skill as a surgeon, but it’s no surprise women feel this way. After all, we are all taught to view women without children as less capable and less committed to the care of others.

At the time I wrote my original essay, I had hoped such sentiments about women without children were declining. But in the weeks after it was released, I watched Kamala Harris’ choice to not have children of her own get repeatedly dragged through the mud. The derogatory rhetoric about women without children has, sadly, only accelerated since I awoke to find myself trending on my phone screen.

I, however, have never wavered in my belief in my value as a childfree woman. Because of the women who have come before me, I have been able to live a life full of joy, meaning, and fulfilment – on my own terms. I will continue to use my voice to ensure others can do the same.

Caitlin A. Smith is a surgeon and writer in the Pacific Northwest. Her personal essays on surgical training and experiences have appeared on Doximity. She is currently writing her first book, a firsthand account about the life and experiences of women in medicine. Find her at @miseducationofaknife on Instagram and Substack.

Do you have a compelling personal story you’d like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we’re looking for here and send us a pitch at pitch@huffpost.com.

Share Button

Ultrasound delays putting pregnant women and cancer patients at risk, sonographers say

Demand for ultrasound has increased but too few people are being trained for the job, sonographers warn.

Share Button

Scientists say we’ve been looking in the wrong place for human origins

Researchers report that a newly uncovered fossil ape from northern Egypt is changing how scientists view early hominoid evolution. The discovery suggests that the closest ancestors of modern apes may have originated in northern Africa, rather than in East Africa, which has long been the main focus of fossil research. “[The] findings […] confirm that paleontologists might have been looking for crown-hominoid ancestors in the wrong place,” write David Alba and Júlia Arias-Martorell in a related Perspective.

The fossil dates to about 17-18 million years ago and belongs to a newly identified species called Masripithecus. It is considered the closest known hominoid relative to the lineage that eventually led to all living apes, including humans. Scientists generally agree that the earliest apes (stem hominoids) first appeared in Afro-Arabia during the Oligocene Epoch more than 25 million years ago. These early apes later spread into Eurasia between about 14 and 16 million years ago during the Miocene. Still, the exact origin of modern apes, which include all living species and their last common ancestor, remains uncertain because fossils from this time are rare, scattered, and often difficult to interpret. This challenge is made worse by gaps in Africa’s fossil record, where most discoveries come from a limited number of locations, leaving large areas from this period unexplored.

Masripithecus moghraensis and Early Ape Diversity

Shorouq Al-Ashqar and colleagues describe the fossil, which was found in the Wadi Moghra region of northern Egypt and dates to around 17-18 million years ago. The species, named Masripithecus moghraensis, provides new insight into ape diversity during a key period when Afro-Arabia was becoming connected to Eurasia, allowing species to spread beyond Africa.

To determine how this species fits into the evolutionary history of humans, the researchers used a Bayesian “tip-dating” method. This approach combines anatomical features with fossil ages to estimate evolutionary relationships and divergence times. Their results indicate that Masripithecus is a stem hominoid closely related to the lineage that eventually gave rise to all modern apes.

New Clues to the Origins of Modern Apes

Based on their findings, the researchers suggest that modern apes may have originated in northern Afro-Arabia, the Levant, or the eastern Mediterranean. This challenges long-standing assumptions and highlights how much remains unknown about the early evolution of apes and humans.

Share Button

Watch the Earth split in real time: Stunning footage captures a 2.5-meter fault slip in seconds

During midday Friday prayers on March 28, 2025, a powerful magnitude 7.7 earthquake hit central Myanmar along the Sagaing Fault. The epicenter was located near Mandalay, the country’s second-largest city. It was the strongest earthquake to strike Myanmar in more than a century and the second deadliest in its modern history.

This earthquake was triggered by a strike-slip fault, where two large sections of the Earth’s crust move horizontally past each other along a vertical fracture. To someone watching, it would appear as if the ground had split along a clear line, with each side being forced in opposite directions.

Previous studies based on seismic recordings suggested that earthquakes like this may involve a pulse-like rupture and slightly curved motion along the fault. However, those conclusions were based on instruments located far from the fault zone, meaning the observations were indirect.

Rare CCTV Footage Captures Fault Movement

In this case, a CCTV camera recorded the fault as it moved, creating a rare opportunity for researchers at Kyoto University to observe the rupture as it happened. (See video link at bottom of article.) This kind of direct visual evidence is extremely unusual in earthquake research.

Frame-by-Frame Analysis Reveals Extreme Speed

The research team used a method called pixel cross-correlation to examine the video frame by frame and measure how the ground shifted. Their findings show that the fault moved sideways by 2.5 meters in just 1.3 seconds, reaching a top speed of 3.2 meters per second.

While this amount of sideways movement is typical for strike-slip earthquakes, the very short duration of the motion stands out as a significant discovery.

“The brief duration of motion confirms a pulse-like rupture, characterized by a concentrated burst of slip propagating along the fault, much like a ripple traveling down a rug when flicked from one end,” says corresponding author Jesse Kearse.

Curved Fault Motion Challenges Assumptions

The analysis also revealed that the path of the slip was slightly curved. This matches earlier geological observations from faults around the world and suggests that fault movement is often not perfectly straight, as commonly assumed.

The study highlights the value of using video footage to monitor fault activity, offering a new way to study earthquakes in detail. Observations like these can improve understanding of how earthquakes unfold and help scientists better estimate the shaking that may occur during future large events.

“We did not anticipate that this video record would provide such a rich variety of detailed observations. Such kinematic data is critical for advancing our understanding of earthquake source physics,” says Kearse.

Next Steps in Earthquake Research

The researchers plan to build on these findings by using physics-based models to explore what controls fault behavior, using the new data revealed by this analysis.

Share Button

Are UK students at risk of more deadly meningitis outbreaks?

The worst seems to be over, but questions remain about why this happened and whether it could happen again.

Share Button

Is screen time always bad and how do I manage it?

How do you manage screen time, does it have a bad impact and what steps can you take to mitigate the problem?

Share Button