The findings were published in Environmental Research Letters this week. The paper outlines the potential benefits and challenges when photovoltaic (PV) arrays are located in grassland ecosystems. The findings are particularly relevant when considering drought in the arid west and the potential for future climate change.

While solar power systems are a key source of renewable energy, they reduce the amount of sunlight available for plant growth, which could impact these complex ecosystems in ways that reduce the wildlife they support, the carbon they store and the amount of forage they produce for livestock grazing. The work, based on four years of data from an agrivoltaics solar facility in Longmont, Colorado, represents the first effort to field test how co-locating solar and grasslands changes those dynamics.

Colorado’s semi-arid grasslands often need more water than is available through precipitation in each season.

The team found that plants beneath and around the solar systems in that environment benefited from partial shading and additional water that collects on panels — aiding in their fight to survive during the harsh summer months. They found that during a dry year, grass growth on the east side of panels was up to 90% more productive in some cases than the neighboring open site. During wet and normal years, this positive grass production response was reduced, but the east side of the panels still saw more grass production than the control site.

Cornell Postdoctoral Research Associate Matthew Sturchio is an author on the paper along with CSU University Distinguished Professor Alan Knapp. Sturchio was previously part of Knapp’s team in the Department of Biology, and he is still an affiliated researcher at CSU.

Sturchio said the results demonstrate the potential of solar land use synergies in grasslands that support both needed renewable power generation and ecosystem stability.

“There have been several studies reporting improved plant and water relations from solar arrays,” he said. “However, this is the first analysis that shows how that pattern becomes more pronounced with increasing aridity or dryness like we see in Colorado.

“The most important takeaway here is that even though this solar array was designed to maximize energy generation — not to promote beneficial environmental conditions for the grasses grown beneath — it still provided a more favorable environment during a dry year.”

Sturchio said those gains could increase if panels were instead designed to maximize their benefits depending on conditions. That may include changing their position to provide shade when air temperatures rise or configuring them to let more light in during key parts of the growing season.

“With small changes in array design, configuration and management, we may even realize untapped benefits, particularly those related to water use,” he said.

The paper is part of ongoing research by the pair into agrivoltaics: a dual use approach where solar power infrastructure is designed and placed to also support livestock grazing or pollinator habitats in parallel. Those agricultural options don’t require irrigation or machinery. However, because of their heavy reliance on rain to support plant growth, research like this is needed to understand how the addition of panels changes the environment overall.

Knapp and his lab have been studying grasslands at CSU for decades, focusing primarily on how they cope with chronic water stress and drought. He said research in the paper focuses on perennial C3, “cool season” grasses that prefer wetter conditions. The next step will be to study the more common C4 grasses found in the plains of Colorado. Those plants flourish in warmer conditions with lots of sunlight.

“Those grasslands are even more water-limited than the ones we used in this study. Thus, we expect the capability of solar arrays to mitigate water stress may be even greater,” Knapp said.

Sturchio added that solar panels may even provide an opportunity to restore grassland ecosystems by promoting diverse plant communities. He said building solar facilities in ecosystems that could benefit from their strategic placement is an obvious win-win.

“We hypothesize that grassland restoration in arid and semi-arid regions could benefit not only from the favorable conditions in solar arrays, but also from the environmental heterogeneity created by panels,” he said. “We are excited to test the functional underpinnings of that idea at the newly constructed Shortgrass Ecovoltaic Research Facility in Nunn, Colorado, very soon.”

The study, published in the journal GeoHealth, underscores the risk posed by hydrogen-sulfide emissions to communities already burdened by other environmental and socioeconomic stressors, the researchers say.

“The communities around the Salton Sea are on the front lines of a worsening environmental health crisis,” said study co-author Mara Freilich, an assistant professor in Brown University’s Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences. “Our study shows that hydrogen-sulfide emissions are not only more intense than previous monitoring captured, but they are systematically underreported — especially when sensors are placed away from the lake or out of alignment with prevailing winds.”

Located about 160 miles east of Los Angeles, the Salton Sea is California’s largest lake. Though bodies of water had filled the basin previously, the current sea formed in 1905, when water from the Colorado River breached an irrigation canal and spilled into the Salton Sink. Since 1907, the lake has been maintained mostly by runoff from the surrounding basin, including agricultural runoff and wastewater that flows in but not out, making the Salton Sea more saline than the Pacific Ocean.

In the 1940s and 1950s, the area became a popular vacation destination, and new residents flocked to neighborhoods near the lakeshore. But during the second half of the 20^th century, lake levels began dropping rapidly, partly because of a hotter and dryer climate and partly because of policies that diverted more water away from the valley. Increasing concentrations of salt and nutrients from agricultural runoff created algal blooms that deprived the lake of oxygen, killing fish and plant life. That desiccating organic matter emits hydrogen sulfide, which has been shown to cause headaches, nausea, fatigue, as well as long-term neurological and respiratory effects at even low levels of exposure, the researchers say.

For this study, researchers from Brown, the University of California, Los Angeles, Loma Linda University, and the University of California, Berkeley, worked with Alianza Coachella Valley, a local nonprofit community organization, to examine the causes of hydrogen-sulfide emissions from the lake. The researchers used data from weather stations and air-quality sensors installed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), a local government agency serving Southern California. Those data were combined with data from remote sensing observations as well as additional air-quality sensors the research team placed within the lake.

The study found that between 2013 and 2024, SCAQMD sensors in the communities of Indio, Mecca and the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation frequently showed hydrogen sulfide readings exceeding State of California standards. The exceedances were most likely in the summer and most pronounced at the Torres Martinez site, which is the closest of the three to the lake. In the month of August for each year from 2013 to 2024, Torres Martinez had an average of more than 250 hours of readings in excess of state standards.

A comparison of wind direction data confirmed that exceedances tended to happen when the wind was blowing into communities from the direction of the lake. An additional sensor the research team placed in the shallow waters of the lake picked up consistently high hydrogen sulfide levels regardless of wind direction. That helps to confirm that the lake is indeed the source of hydrogen-sulfide emissions, and suggests that only a fraction of the total emissions is being captured by community-based regulatory sensors. Currently, only three of the numerous communities on the Salton Sea’s long shoreline are monitored by regulatory agencies.

“Our results indicate that a significant portion of [hydrogen-sulfide] emissions remains unaccounted for, potentially being transported to communities without air monitoring stations,” the researchers wrote.

The findings highlight the need for increased air-quality monitoring around the Salton Sea, the researchers say. There’s also a need for further study of the public health consequences of these emissions.

“Community residents exposed to hydrogen sulfide are impacted not only in their physical health — experiencing respiratory irritation, headaches and fatigue — but as well in their quality of life,” said Diego Centeno, study co-author who carried out this work as a researcher at Brown University and is now a Ph.D. candidate at UCLA. “As the sea’s shoreline continues to recede and sulfate concentrations increase, there is a growing concern that hydrogen sulfide will emit more frequently and at greater magnitudes.”

The residents who live in the impacted communities are primarily Latinx and Indigenous (Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians) and already face elevated rates of asthma and other respiratory illnesses.

“This is a textbook case of environmental injustice,” said Aydee Palomino, project manager for the Campaign for Thriving Salton Sea Communities at Alianza Coachella Valley and a study co-author. “People in the Coachella and Imperial valleys are breathing in pollutants that are under the radar of traditional monitoring systems. Our work highlights the power of community science to expose these gaps and push for equitable solutions.”

The research was supported by Burroughs Wellcome Fund, the Google Environmental Justice Data Fund and NASA. Freilich learned in March 2025 that the NASA grant supporting this work had been terminated. She said the unexpected termination has disrupted planned follow-up work, including efforts to share and discuss the findings with members of the affected community.