Trump Attacks Zelenskyy Yet Again, Accusing Him Of ‘Inflammatory Statements’ Over Crimea

Donald Trump has just accused Volodymyr Zelenskyy of making “inflammatory” statements over Crimea while the US is still pushing for a quick end to the Ukraine war.

The US has been trying to broker peace talks between Moscow and Kyiv for months, but Vladimir Putin – who started the war in February 2022 – has repeatedly dragged his heels.

Even when Trump has offered to resolve the conflict on terms favourable to the Kremlin with very few concessions, Putin has resisted.

Instead, the White House has reportedly suggested Kyiv recognise Russia’s illegal annexation of the Ukrainian peninsula Crimea to secure peace.

But the Ukrainian president has already rejected this idea, telling reporters on Tuesday: “There is nothing to talk about. This violates our Constitution. This is our territory, the territory of the people of Ukraine.”

In a lengthy post on Truth Social on Wednesday, the US president hit back.

Trump accused Zelenskyy of “boasting” that Ukraine will not legally recognise the occupation of Crimea.

He said: “This statement is very harmful to the Peace Negotiations with Russia in that Crimea was lost years ago under the auspices of President Barack Hussein Obama, and is not even a point of discussion.

“Nobody is asking Zelenskyy to recognize Crimea as Russian Territory but, if he wants Crimea, why didn’t they fight for it eleven years ago when it was handed over to Russia without a shot being fired?”

He continued: “It’s inflammatory statements like Zelenskyy’s that makes it so difficult to settle this War.

“He has nothing to boast about!

“The situation for Ukraine is dire — He can have Peace or, he can fight for another three years before losing the whole Country.

“I have nothing to do with Russia, but have much to do with wanting to save, on average, five thousand Russian and Ukrainian soldiers a week, who are dying for no reason whatsoever.

“The statement made by Zelenskyy today will do nothing but prolong the ‘killing field,’ and nobody wants that!

“We are very close to a Deal, but the man with “no cards to play” should now, finally, GET IT DONE. I look forward to being able to help Ukraine, and Russia, get out of this Complete and Total MESS, that would have never started if I were President!”

Before he was re-elected last year, the US president promised to resolve the conflict within 24 hours.

Now, more than three months after his January inauguration, Trump and his top team have repeatedly threatened to withdraw from the whole peace process unless they see significant process.

Trump’s secretary of state Marco Rubio also surprised western allies when he announced – at the last minute – that he would be skipping the planned peace discussions in London on Wednesday, citing scheduling issues.

The whole occasion was then downgraded from a meeting between senior ministers to officials.

Share Button

Nigel Farage Dubbed ‘A Con Artist’ For Suggesting Climate Change May Not Be Man-Made

Nigel Farage has been dubbed “a con artist” after he suggested climate change may not be man-made.

The Reform UK leader also called for the government to ditch its net zero policies because they “make no difference whatsoever” to global warming.

Asked on Radio 4′s Today programme if he accepted climate change was at least partly man-made, Farage would only say: “It may well be.”

He added: “Let’s go with the scientists. Let’s say that the 3% to 5% of CO2 emissions in the world every year that are man-made, as opposed to natural, are having a detrimental, or at least a warming effect on the world. Let’s start from that position.”

However, he avoided the question when asked if that was his own position.

Farage also said politicians should not “commit economic hara-kiri” in order to tackle the problem.

“I think we should scrap the net zero targets, yes, absolutely. I think they’re going to make zero difference in the world,” he said.

Green Party co-leader Adrian Ramsay condemned Farage, and challenged him to a public debate on climate change.

He said: “Nigel Farage is a performer, a con artist. He will say or do anything. He will happily dance to a populist tune regardless of its impact.

“This morning’s performance suggested he hasn’t got the slightest grasp of even the most basic climate science. But I think it’s worse than that. He understands all too well human-made climate change, but he is willing to pretend he doesn’t and stand in the way of climate action for his party’s populist agenda.

“If he really does believe what he says, let’s see if his ridiculous rhetoric stands up to actual scrutiny – let’s see if he is prepared to take part in an hour-long TV debate about climate change and the challenge of reaching net zero?”

Share Button

World on course to trigger multiple climate ‘tipping points’ unless action accelerates

Multiple climate “tipping points” are likely to be triggered if global policies stay on their current course, new research shows.

Scientists assessed the risk of “tipping” in 16 different parts of the Earth system — ranging from the collapse of major ice sheets to the dieback of tropical coral reefs and vast forests.

Based on current policies and the resulting global warming, their most conservative estimate is a 62% risk of triggering these tipping points on average.

However, more sustainable future pathways — with lower greenhouse gas emissions — significantly reduce the risk of tipping points.

The study, by the universities of Exeter and Hamburg, also found that carbon released by certain tipping points (Amazon rainforest dieback and permafrost thaw) is unlikely to cause enough warming to trigger other tipping points.

“The good news from our study is that the power to prevent climate tipping points is still in our hands,” said lead author Jakob Deutloff.

“By moving towards a more sustainable future with lower emissions, the risk of triggering these tipping points is significantly reduced.

“And it appears that breaching tipping points within the Amazon and the permafrost region should not necessarily trigger others.”

A “tipping point” occurs when a small change tips a system into a new state, causing significant and long-term transformation.

The study assessed tipping point probabilities in five different scenarios, known as shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs). Professor Tim Lenton, from Exeter’s Global Systems Institute, said: “Climate tipping points could have devastating consequences for humanity.

“It is clear that we are currently on a dangerous trajectory — with tipping points likely to be triggered unless we change course rapidly.

“We need urgent global action — including the triggering of ‘positive tipping points’ in our societies and economies — to reach a safe and sustainable future.”

During the writing phase, Jakob Deutloff was funded by the German Research Foundation. Professor Lenton’s work was supported by the Bezos Earth Fund.

Share Button

Supreme Court Ruling Is Anything But Clear – And Endangers All Women’s Rights, Trans Group Warns

A leading trans advocacy group has hit out at the “widespread confusion and fear” caused by the Supreme Court’s ruling that a woman is defined by biology.

The momentous judgement came after years of campaigning from gender-critical groups and has left the trans community in disarray.

Keir Starmer has shifted his stance on trans rights recently too. His spokesperson said on Tuesday that the PM no longer believes a trans woman is a woman – even though he said the opposite in 2022 – and said the government welcomes the judgement.

But, in a new letter to the prime minister, campaigners from TransActual challenged the government’s repeated claim that the top judges’ decision had brought “clarity” and pointed out the 14 issues the ruling has not addressed.

The letter asked: “How is ‘biological sex’ to be defined other than by certification on original birth certificates? Hormonal? Genital? Chromosomal? How will outliers in these be treated?”

The campaigners also looked at how women who are not trans will be impacted by the Court’s decision, particularly women with “gender non-conforming appearances or attributes”.

The group said: “In the course of early legal analysis, a number of huge risks have been identified for all LGBTQ+ people, as well as women with gender non-conforming appearance or attributes, which arise from this deviation from the clear original intentions and definitions in the Equality Act.”

It also asked: “What mechanisms will be available to correct ‘administrative’ mistakes such as the young girl recently reported as having M marked on her original birth certificate last autumn, or the woman who discovered a few years ago that she was legally male when she went to marry her long-term partner and father of their child?”

The campaigners then questioned single-sex issues around policing.

TransActual asked: “How will policies like that of the British Transport Police (BTP) – who announced that trans women would be strip-searched by male officers – not create a huge risk to all women?

“How will the BTP determine who is trans and who is not? What will the remedy be for those women who are not trans who end up being strip-searched by male BTP officers? What is the impact on trans people’s privacy?”

The group also looked at the issues around public places after the minister for equalities and education secretary Bridget Phillipson said people should use toilets according to their biological sex.

“How would access to single-sex spaces be policed?” the campaigners asked. “How would this be funded? What laws would be brought in to enforce this as, for example, the only laws around public toilets are around their provision, not who accesses them?”

It also asked: “If trans women should be barred from female single-sex spaces, and trans men be barred from female and male single-sex spaces, which facilities should trans men use, and how will you ensure trans women’s safety and dignity?”

This morning we wrote to the Prime Minister to express concern in respect of last week’s Supreme Court’s ruling and the confusion that has brought to all equalities law. You’ll find more info on what we said, and the letter itself, at: transactual.org.uk/blog/2025/04… #Trans #Nonbinary

— TransActual (@transactualuk.bsky.social) 2025-04-22T19:00:19.941Z

TransActual head Helen Belcher concluded the letter by writing: “We hope that these urgent questions demonstrate this ruling has brought widespread confusion and fear, not clarity, and that equalities law in the UK must be immediately returned to a sound legal footing.

“There are many other questions which also arise from the judgement which will follow as legal study is done and the practical effects continue.”

When LBC presenter Nick Ferrari asked about the British Transport Police policy that male officers would now be conducting strip-searches on trans women, policing minister Diana Johnson appeared to support it.

She said: “My understanding from the Supreme Court judgement last week is, that it would be done on the basis of biological sex…yes, that’s the law of the land. And I support the law of the land.

“I’m very pleased we’ve got that clarity from last week as to biological sex being the basis of that.”

But Green Party co-leader Carla Denyer, later hit back at the government’s response.

She told HuffPost UK: “Sadly for women, both trans and not, many of [our] rights have been eroded in recent years.

“Cuts to healthcare, a rise in misogyny and transphobia, and government neglect of public services have made us all less safe and less supported.

“I’m deeply concerned that this government’s response to the recent Supreme Court ruling will entrench these problems for trans people, while doing nothing to address the real issues facing all women – making it harder for trans people to exist in public spaces, to access support, or to get healthcare.

“I am also worried that rather than standing up against a tide of hatred and fear directed against trans people, this government is giving ground to those who would see trans people pushed out of public life.”

All of us, whether we’re trans or not, deserve dignity and respect, and the freedom to go about our daily lives without fear of abuse or harassment. Govt has urgent Qs to answer about how it will ensure those rights for trans people – sadly I didn’t get those answers yesterday.

— Carla Denyer (@carladenyer.bsky.social) 2025-04-23T09:46:20.689Z

Share Button

Why are Patagonian glaciers rapidly losing mass?

Over the past two decades, satellite-based planetary observations have recorded rapid mass loss of Patagonian glaciers, contributing approximately 0.07 mm per year to global sea-level rise. A study published in Nature Communications links this mass loss to a poleward shift of subtropical high-pressure systems. This large-scale atmospheric circulation change brings more warm air to Patagonia, thereby accelerating glacier melt.

Located in the southern Andes between Chile and Argentina, Patagonia hosts the largest and wettest glaciated region in the Southern Hemisphere outside Antarctica. “The Southern Andes act as a natural barrier, blocking moisture-laden westerly winds from the Pacific Ocean,” explains Brice Noël, climatologist at the University of Liège. “As a result, glaciers locally receive over fifteen metres of snowfall annually, particularly on the western flank of the Andes.”

While snow accumulation at higher elevations contributes to glacier growth, rapid melting occurs at lower altitudes. “Glaciers can extend down to sea level, where warmer air triggers substantial summer melt. This meltwater eventually runs off into the ocean, leading to sea-level rise.” Scientists estimate that since the 1940s, Patagonian glaciers have lost over a quarter of their total ice volume, raising global sea level by 3.7 mm.

High-resolution climate model

The research team from Liège, Leuven, and Delft estimated the surface mass balance of Patagonian glaciers since 1940 — that is, the difference between winter snowfall and meltwater runoff in summer. “We used MAR, our regional climate model developed at the University of Liège,” adds Xavier Fettweis, climatologist at ULiège. MAR is a polar climate model that simulates snow and ice processes on a five-kilometre spatial grid, which is too coarse to represent the small-scale Patagonian glaciers. “High spatial resolution is essential to study the glacier surface mass balance in Patagonia, so we spatially refined our model to a 500-metre grid,” notes Brice Noël. Lower-resolution models fail to accurately capture narrow glacier tongues* that melt rapidly or estimate realistic precipitation over the rugged Andes. “Our high-resolution model closely aligns with in situ and satellite mass loss observations,” confirms Bert Wouters from Delft University of Technology.

What drives glacier mass loss?

Sustained mass loss since 1940 is attributed to a long-term increase in meltwater runoff to the ocean, a consequence of atmospheric warming in Patagonia. “We identify increased surface runoff as the primary driver of glacier mass loss, as snowfall has remained steady since the 1940s,” explains Brice Noël. Surface runoff intensifies when firn — the porous, perennial snow layer covering the upper glacier zones — melts away, exposing the underlying bare ice. “Bare ice is darker than the surrounding firn, thus absorbing more solar energy in turn enhancing melt and runoff,” explains Stef Lhermitte of KU Leuven.

Poleward shift of subtropical highs

Besides the effect of global warming, researchers attribute the fast increase in Patagonian temperatures to a large-scale atmospheric shift, whereby subtropical high-pressure systems migrate poleward. This shift, observed over the past forty years, channels more warm air into Patagonia, thereby amplifying mass loss. Ocean-atmosphere interactions underpinning this circulation change are driven by global warming and are likely to persist in the future. “Complete melting of Patagonian glaciers could raise global sea-level by an extra centimetre,” warns Brice Noël. “Their disappearance would endanger South American communities reliant on summer meltwater supply.” At the current rate of mass loss, scientists project that Patagonian glaciers could vanish within the next 250 years.

* A glacier tongue refers to the downstream extension of a glacier, resembling an icy “arm” descending into a valley or flatter terrain.

Share Button

New porous crystal catalyst offers durable, efficient solution for clean hydrogen production

A new catalyst structure offers a potential pathway toward more cost-effective hydrogen production via water electrolysis. The material centers on mesoporous single-crystalline Co3O4 doped with atomically dispersed iridium (Ir), designed for the acidic oxygen evolution reaction (OER).

Iridium is known for its OER performance but is both scarce and expensive. Efficient use of Ir while maintaining stability is a major challenge for scaling up electrolyzer technologies. This study proposes a solution through a material that maximizes atomic-level efficiency.

The catalyst features a mesoporous spinel structure that allows for high Ir loading (13.8 wt%) without forming large Ir clusters. This configuration enables the formation of Co-Ir bridge sites, which show high intrinsic activity under acidic OER conditions.

Computational analysis indicates that under reaction conditions, oxygen intermediates (O*) fully cover Co3O4 surfaces, which usually passivates Co sites. However, Ir doping reactivates these sites, while simultaneously enhancing the structural integrity of the catalyst.

Leaching of both Ir and Co during reaction was significantly reduced. Compared to conventional Ir/Co3O4 catalysts, Ir and Co loss was lowered to approximately one-fourth and one-fifth, respectively. The catalyst also maintained performance for over 100 hours with an overpotential (η₁₀) of just 248 mV.

“The mesoporous architecture plays a crucial role,” explains Professor Hao Li, who led the study. “It provides space for single-atom Ir loading and helps create a stable environment for catalytic activity.”

The research combines experimental data with computational modeling, and key findings are available through the Digital Catalysis Platform (www.digcat.org), a resource developed by the Hao Li Lab to support catalyst discovery.

This work was supported by the Tohoku University Support Program. Future research will focus on tuning the doping level, scaling up the synthesis process, and exploring integration into commercial electrolyzer systems.

Share Button

‘One-of-a-kind’ girl born with heart outside chest has pioneering surgery

Vanellope, now seven, undergoes more surgery to reconstruct a “cage” around her heart, using her ribs.

Share Button

‘I’ve had 100 operations and will never stop’ – inside China’s cosmetic surgery boom

Face-scanning apps, social media influencers and toxic beauty standards are fuelling China’s cosmetic surgery boom.

Share Button

Bridget Phillipson Brutally Slaps Down Lee Anderson In Angry Commons Clash

Bridget Phillipson brutally slapped down Lee Anderson as the pair clashed angrily in the House of Commons.

The Reform UK MP infuriated the education secretary during a debate on last week’s Supreme Court ruling that sex is defined by biology.

Anderson asked Phillipson: “I don’t need a Supreme Court judgment or ruling to tell me that a bloke shouldn’t be in a women’s changing rooms.

“I want to ask the secretary of state a very simple question for more clarity: can a woman have a penis?”

The minister replied: “I’ll tell you what, blokes shouldn’t beat up women. Maybe he should have a word with his colleague.”

That was a reference to another Reform UK MP, James McMurdock, who was jailed 19 years ago for repeatedly kicking his girlfriend, according to court documents.

He spent 21 days in a young offenders’ institution after admitting the attack.

The MP for South Basildon and East Thurrock, who was elected last July, told Sky News last year: “Nearly 20 years ago, at 19 years of age, at the end of a night out together, we argued and I pushed her. She fell over and she was hurt. Despite being 38 now and having lived a whole life again I still feel deeply ashamed and apologetic.

“Despite us both being very drunk, I handed myself into the police immediately and admitted my fault. I was charged for what I did, not for what has been claimed, and I faced the consequences then and paid for my action in full.”

<div class="js-react-hydrator" data-component-name="Twitter" data-component-id="5377" data-component-props="{"itemType":"rich","index":13,"contentIndexByType":1,"contentListType":"embed","code":"

Lee Anderson(Reform MP): Can a woman have a penis?

Bridget Phillipson: \"I’ll tell you what, blokes shouldn’t beat up women, maybe he should have a word with his colleague.\" pic.twitter.com/Xs2W6rWRE8

— Haggis_UK 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 (@Haggis_UK) April 22, 2025

","type":"rich","meta":{"author":"Haggis_UK 🇬🇧 🇪🇺","author_url":"https://twitter.com/Haggis_UK","cache_age":86400,"description":"Lee Anderson(Reform MP): Can a woman have a penis?Bridget Phillipson: \"I’ll tell you what, blokes shouldn’t beat up women, maybe he should have a word with his colleague.\" pic.twitter.com/Xs2W6rWRE8— Haggis_UK 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 (@Haggis_UK) April 22, 2025\n\n\n","options":{"_hide_media":{"label":"Hide photos, videos, and cards","value":false},"_maxwidth":{"label":"Adjust width","placeholder":"220-550, in px","value":""},"_theme":{"value":"","values":{"dark":"Use dark theme"}}},"provider_name":"Twitter","thumbnail_height":720,"thumbnail_url":"https://pbs.twimg.com/ext_tw_video_thumb/1914739271778418688/pu/img/EcsYN7onoZMGXjdu.jpg:large","thumbnail_width":1152,"title":"Haggis_UK 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 on Twitter / X","type":"rich","url":"https://twitter.com/Haggis_UK/status/1914739302606553456","version":"1.0"},"flags":[],"enhancements":{},"fullBleed":false,"options":{"theme":"news","device":"desktop","editionInfo":{"id":"uk","name":"U.K.","link":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk","locale":"en_GB"},"originalEdition":"uk","isMapi":false,"isAmp":false,"isAdsFree":false,"isVideoEntry":false,"isEntry":true,"isMt":false,"entryId":"6807e5efe4b00081c708c5b9","entryPermalink":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/bridget-phillipson-brutally-slaps-down-lee-anderson-in-angry-commons-clash_uk_6807e5efe4b00081c708c5b9","entryTagsList":"lee-anderson,bridget-phillipson,@ai_seo_headline","sectionSlug":"politics","deptSlug":null,"sectionRedirectUrl":null,"subcategories":"","isWide":false,"headerOverride":null,"noVideoAds":false,"disableFloat":false,"isNative":false,"commercialVideo":{"provider":"custom","site_and_category":"uk.politics","package":null},"isHighline":false,"vidibleConfigValues":{"cid":"60afc140cf94592c45d7390c","disabledWithMapiEntries":false,"overrides":{"all":"60b8e525cdd90620331baaf4"},"whitelisted":["56c5f12ee4b03a39c93c9439","56c6056ee4b01f2b7e1b5f35","59bfee7f9e451049f87f550b","5acccbaac269d609ef44c529","570278d2e4b070ff77b98217","57027b4be4b070ff77b98d5c","56fe95c4e4b0041c4242016b","570279cfe4b06d08e3629954","5ba9e8821c2e65639162ccf1","5bcd9904821576674bc55ced","5d076ca127f25f504327c72e","5b35266b158f855373e28256","5ebac2e8abddfb04f877dff2","60b8e525cdd90620331baaf4","60b64354b171b7444beaff4d","60d0d8e09340d7032ad0fb1a","60d0d90f9340d7032ad0fbeb","60d0d9949340d7032ad0fed3","60d0d9f99340d7032ad10113","60d0daa69340d7032ad104cf","60d0de02b627221e9d819408"],"playlists":{"default":"57bc306888d2ff1a7f6b5579","news":"56c6dbcee4b04edee8beb49c","politics":"56c6dbcee4b04edee8beb49c","entertainment":"56c6e7f2e4b0983aa64c60fc","tech":"56c6f70ae4b043c5bdcaebf9","parents":"56cc65c2e4b0239099455b42","lifestyle":"56cc66a9e4b01f81ef94e98c"},"playerUpdates":{"56c6056ee4b01f2b7e1b5f35":"60b8e525cdd90620331baaf4","56c5f12ee4b03a39c93c9439":"60d0d8e09340d7032ad0fb1a","59bfee7f9e451049f87f550b":"60d0d90f9340d7032ad0fbeb","5acccbaac269d609ef44c529":"60d0d9949340d7032ad0fed3","5bcd9904821576674bc55ced":"60d0d9f99340d7032ad10113","5d076ca127f25f504327c72e":"60d0daa69340d7032ad104cf","5ebac2e8abddfb04f877dff2":"60d0de02b627221e9d819408"}},"connatixConfigValues":{"defaultPlayer":"16b0ecc6-802c-4120-845f-e90629812c4d","clickToPlayPlayer":"823ac03a-0f7e-4bcb-8521-a5b091ae948d","videoPagePlayer":"05041ada-93f7-4e86-9208-e03a5b19311b","defaultPlaylist":"2e062669-71b4-41df-b17a-df6b1616bc8f"},"topConnatixThumnbailSrc":"","customAmpComponents":[],"ampAssetsUrl":"https://amp.assets.huffpost.com","videoTraits":null,"positionInUnitCounts":{"buzz_head":{"count":0},"buzz_body":{"count":0},"buzz_bottom":{"count":0}},"positionInSubUnitCounts":{"article_body":{"count":4},"blog_summary":{"count":0},"before_you_go_content":{"count":0}},"connatixCountsHelper":{"count":0},"buzzfeedTracking":{"context_page_id":"6807e5efe4b00081c708c5b9","context_page_type":"buzz","destination":"huffpost","mode":"desktop","page_edition":"en-uk"},"tags":[{"name":"Lee Anderson","slug":"lee-anderson","links":{"relativeLink":"news/lee-anderson","permalink":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/news/lee-anderson","mobileWebLink":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/news/lee-anderson"},"url":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/news/lee-anderson/"},{"name":"bridget phillipson","slug":"bridget-phillipson","links":{"relativeLink":"news/bridget-phillipson","permalink":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/news/bridget-phillipson","mobileWebLink":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/news/bridget-phillipson"},"url":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/news/bridget-phillipson/"}],"isLiveblogLive":null,"isLiveblog":false,"cetUnit":"buzz_body","bodyAds":["

\r\n\r\n HPGam.cmd.push(function(){\r\n\t\treturn HPGam.render(\"inline-1\", \"entry_paragraph_1\", false, false);\r\n });\r\n\r\n","

\r\n\r\n HPGam.cmd.push(function(){\r\n\t\treturn HPGam.render(\"inline\", \"entry_paragraph_2\", false, false);\r\n });\r\n\r\n","

\r\n\r\n HPGam.cmd.push(function(){\r\n\t\treturn HPGam.render(\"inline-2\", \"entry_paragraph_3\", false, false);\r\n });\r\n\r\n","

\r\n\r\n HPGam.cmd.push(function(){\r\n\t\treturn HPGam.render(\"inline-infinite\", \"repeating_dynamic_display\", false, false);\r\n });\r\n\r\n"],"adCount":0},"isCollectionEmbed":false}”>

Lee Anderson(Reform MP): Can a woman have a penis?

Bridget Phillipson: “I’ll tell you what, blokes shouldn’t beat up women, maybe he should have a word with his colleague.” pic.twitter.com/Xs2W6rWRE8

— Haggis_UK 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 (@Haggis_UK) April 22, 2025

Phillipson had also raised the incident during an earlier exchange with Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice.

He said: “Now we have got confirmation from the Supreme Court what the definition of a woman is, could the secretary of state confirm that all public sector and private sector bodies will apply that definition with immediate effect?”

Phillipson replied: “The Equality and Human Rights Commission will set out a statutory code of practice that will provide further clarity.

“But I would just say to [Mr Tice] that I will take no lectures from his party about the importance of defending women’s rights, given that one of his own number, that sits on those benches, was convicted and went to prison for assaulting his former partner.”

Nigel Farage last year described Mr McMurdock as “good example to young tearaways” who “picked himself up from a terrible situation and made a big success”.

Share Button