The researchers sampled groundwater in two different watersheds adjacent to the Fayetteville Works fluorochemical plant in Bladen County.

“There’s a huge area of PFAS contaminated groundwater — including residential and agricultural land — which impacts the population in two ways,” says David Genereux, professor of marine, earth and atmospheric sciences at NC State and leader of the study.

“First, there are over 7,000 private wells whose users are directly affected by the contamination. Second, groundwater carrying PFAS discharges into tributaries of the Cape Fear River, which affects downstream users of river water in and near Wilmington.”

The researchers tested the samples they took to determine PFAS types and levels, then used groundwater age-dating tracers, coupled with atmospheric contamination data from the N.C. Department of Environmental Quality and the rate of groundwater flow, to create a model that estimated both past and future PFAS concentrations in the groundwater discharging to tributary streams.

They detected PFAS in groundwater up to 43 years old, and concentrations of the two most commonly found PFAS — hexafluoropropylene oxide-dimer acid (HFPO−DA) and perfluoro-2-methoxypropanoic acid (PMPA) — averaged 229 and 498 nanograms per liter (ng/L), respectively. For comparison, the maximum contaminant level (MCL) issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for HFPO-DA in public drinking water is 10 ng/L. MCLs are enforceable drinking water standards.

“These results suggest it could take decades for natural groundwater flow to flush out groundwater PFAS still present from the ‘high emission years,’ roughly the period between 1980 and 2019,” Genereux says. “And this could be an underestimate; the time scale could be longer if PFAS is diffusing into and out of low-permeability zones (clay layers and lenses) below the water table.”

The researchers point out that although air emissions of PFAS are substantially lower now than they were prior to 2019, they are not zero, so some atmospheric deposition of PFAS seems likely to continue to feed into the groundwater.

“Even a best-case scenario — without further atmospheric deposition — would mean that PFAS emitted in past decades will slowly flush from groundwater to surface water for about 40 more years,” Genereux says. “We expect groundwater PFAS contamination to be a multi-decade problem, and our work puts some specific numbers behind that. We plan to build on this work by modeling future PFAS at individual drinking water wells and working with toxicologists to relate past PFAS levels at wells to observable health outcomes.”

The solutions to these long-standing problems could further enhance our understanding of symmetries of structures and objects in nature and science, and of long-term behavior of various random processes arising in fields ranging from chemistry and physics to engineering, computer science and economics.

Pham Tiep, the Joshua Barlaz Distinguished Professor of Mathematics in the Rutgers School of Arts and Science’s Department of Mathematics, has completed a proof of the 1955 Height Zero Conjecture posed by Richard Brauer, a leading German-American mathematician who died in 1977. Proof of the conjecture — commonly viewed as one of the most outstanding challenges in a field of math known as the representation theory of finite groups — was published in the September issue of the Annals of Mathematics.

“A conjecture is an idea that you believe has some validity,” said Tiep, who has thought about the Brauer problem for most of his career and worked on it intensively for the past 10 years. “But conjectures have to be proven.I was hoping to advance the field. I never expected to be able to solve this one.”

In a sense, Tiep and his colleagues have been following a blueprint of challenges Brauer laid out for them in a series of mathematical conjectures posed and published in the 1950-60s.

“Some mathematicians have this rare intellect,” Tiep said of Brauer. “It’s as though they came from another planet or from another world. They are capable of seeing hidden phenomena that others can’t.”

In the second advance, Tiep solved a difficult problem in what is known as the Deligne-Lusztig theory, part of the foundational machinery of representation theory. The breakthrough touches on traces, an important feature of a rectangular array known as a matrix. The trace of a matrix is the sum of its diagonal elements. The work is detailed in two papers, one was published in Inventiones mathematicae, vol. 235 (2024), the second in Annals, vol. 200 (2024).

“Tiep’s high-quality work and expertise on finite groups has allowed Rutgers to maintain its status as a top world-wide center in the subject,” said Stephen Miller, a Distinguished Professor and Chair of the Department of Mathematics. “One of the great accomplishments in 20^th century mathematics was the classification of the so-called but perhaps misleadingly named ‘simple’ finite groups, and it is synonymous with Rutgers — it was led from here and many of the most interesting examples were discovered here. Through his amazing stretch of strong work, Tiep brings international visibility to our department.”

Insights from the solution are likely to greatly enhance mathematicians’ understanding of traces, Tiep said. The solution also provides insights that could lead to breakthroughs in other important problems in mathematics, including conjectures posed by the University of Florida mathematician John Thompson and the Israeli mathematician Alexander Lubotzky, he added.

Both breakthroughs are advances in the field of representation theory of finite groups, a subset of algebra. Representation theory is an important tool in many areas of math, including number theory and algebraic geometry as well as in the physical sciences, including particle physics. Through mathematical objects known as groups, representation theory also has been used to study symmetry in molecules, encrypt messages and produce error-correcting codes.

Following the principles of representation theory, mathematicians take abstract shapes that exist in Euclidean geometry — some of them extremely complex — and transform them into arrays of numbers. This can be achieved by identifying certain points that exist in each three- or higher-dimensional shape and converting them to numbers placed in rows and columns.

The reverse operation must work, too, Tiep said: One needs to be able to reconstitute the shape from the sequence of numbers.

Unlike many of his colleagues in the physical sciences who often employ complex devices to advance their work, Tiep said he uses only a pen and paper to conduct his research, which so far has resulted in five books and more than 200 papers in leading mathematical journals.

He jots down math formulas or sentences indicating chains of logic. He also engages in continual conversations — in person or on Zoom — with colleagues as they proceed step by step through a proof.

But progress can come from internal reflection, Tiep said, and ideas burst forth when he is least expecting it.

“Maybe I’m walking with our children or doing some gardening with my wife or just doing something in the kitchen,” he said. “My wife says she always knows when I’m thinking about math.”

On the first proof, Tiep collaborated with Gunter Malle of Technische Universität Kaiserslautern in Germany, Gabriel Navarro of Universitat de València in Spain and Amanda Schaeffer Fry, a former graduate student of Tiep’s who is now at the University of Denver.

For the second breakthrough, Tiep worked with Robert Guralnick of the University of Southern California and Michael Larsen of Indiana University. On the first of two papers that tackle the mathematical problems on traces and solve them, Tiep worked with Guralnick and Larsen. Tiep and Larsen are co-authors of the second paper.

“Tiep and coauthors have obtained bounds on traces which are about as good as we could ever expect to obtain,” Miller said. “It’s a mature subject which is important from many angles, so progress is hard — and applications are many.”