A hidden Antarctic shift unleashed the carbon that warmed the world

Around 12,000 years ago, the last Ice Age drew to a close. Global temperatures rose, the early Holocene began, and human communities gradually shifted toward more permanent settlements. A new study published in Nature Geoscience highlights how the Southern Ocean around Antarctica helped drive this major climate transition.

The research team, led by Dr. Huang Huang of the Laoshan Laboratory in Qingdao and including geochemist Dr. Marcus Gutjahr from GEOMAR, set out to reconstruct how far Antarctic Bottom Water (AABW) extended through the Southern Ocean over the past 32,000 years.

“We wanted to understand how the influence of Antarctic Bottom Water, the coldest and densest water mass in the global ocean, changed during the last deglaciation, and what role it played in the global carbon cycle,” says Huang, who completed his PhD at GEOMAR in 2019 and now works as a scientist in Qingdao, China.

Sediment cores and chemical fingerprints in the deep sea

To tackle this question, the scientists examined nine sediment cores collected from the Atlantic and Indian sectors of the Southern Ocean. The cores came from water depths between about 2,200 and 5,000 meters and from locations spread widely across the region. By analyzing the isotopic composition of the trace metal neodymium preserved in the sediments, which reflects the chemistry of the surrounding seawater, they could reconstruct how Antarctic Bottom Water changed through time on the scale of tens of thousands of years.

“Dissolved neodymium and its isotopic fingerprint in seawater are excellent indicators of the origin of deep-water masses,” explains Dr. Marcus Gutjahr. “In earlier studies, we noticed that the neodymium signature in the deep South Atlantic only reached its modern composition around 12,000 years ago. However, sediments from the last Ice Age showed values that are not found anywhere in the Southern Ocean today. Initially, we thought the method was flawed or that there was something wrong with the sediment core. But the real question was: What could generate such a signal? Such an exotic isotopic signature can only develop when deep water remains almost motionless for extended periods. In such circumstances, benthic fluxes — chemical inputs from the seafloor — dominate the isotopic imprint in marine sediments.”

Stagnant deep waters, carbon storage and the last Ice Age

During the last Ice Age, the cold and very dense deep water that currently forms around Antarctica did not spread as widely as it does today. Instead, much of the deep Southern Ocean was filled with carbon-rich waters that originated in the Pacific, a glacial precursor to today’s Circumpolar Deep Water (CDW). In the study, CDW is described as carbon-rich because it circulates in the deep ocean for long periods with limited contact with the surface. This isolation allowed large amounts of dissolved carbon to remain locked in the deep ocean, helping to keep atmospheric CO2 levels relatively low.

As Earth warmed and ice sheets retreated between roughly 18,000 and 10,000 years ago, the volume of Antarctic Bottom Water increased in two clear phases. These expansion phases occurred at the same time as known warming events in Antarctica. With more vertical mixing in the Southern Ocean, deep waters that had stored carbon for long periods were brought closer to the surface, allowing that carbon to escape into the atmosphere.

“The expansion of the AABW is linked to several processes,” explains Gutjahr. “Warming around Antarctica reduced sea-ice cover, resulting in more meltwater entering the Southern Ocean. The Antarctic Bottom Water formed during this transitional climate period had a lower density due to reduced salinity. This late-glacial AABW was able to spread further through the Southern Ocean, destabilizing the existing water-mass structure and enhancing exchanges between deep and surface waters.”

Previously, many scientists assumed that changes in the North Atlantic, particularly the formation of North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW), were the main drivers of shifts in deep-water circulation in the South Atlantic. The new results suggest that this northern influence was more restricted than earlier thought. Instead, the replacement of a glacial, carbon-rich deep-water mass by newly formed Antarctic Bottom Water appears to have been crucial for the rise in atmospheric CO2 toward the end of the last Ice Age.

Southern Ocean heat, Antarctic ice loss and today’s climate

“Comparisons with the past are always imperfect,” says Gutjahr, “but ultimately it comes down to how much energy is in the system. If we understand how the ocean responded to warming in the past, we can better grasp what is happening today as Antarctic ice shelves continue to melt.”

Because of its vast size and unique circulation, the Southern Ocean plays a major role in controlling the global climate. Over the past 50 years, waters deeper than about 1,000 meters around Antarctica have warmed significantly faster than much of the rest of the world’s oceans. To work out how this rapid deep-ocean warming affects the ability of the ocean to absorb and release carbon dioxide, scientists must track physical and biogeochemical changes over long timescales and incorporate them into climate models.

“I want to properly understand the modern ocean in order to interpret signals from the past,” Gutjahr says. “If we can trace how Antarctic Bottom Water has changed over the last few thousand years, we can assess more accurately how rapidly the Antarctic Ice Sheet may continue to lose mass in the future.”

Paleoclimate data obtained from sediment cores are indispensable for this, offering insights into past climates that were warmer than today and helping to improve projections of future climate change.

Share Button

Cancer patient welcomes newly-approved treatment

Sharon Price from Newcastle-under-Lyme says she was glad to avoid the need for surgery.

Share Button

Ambulance demand spikes as flu season worsens

The service says calls increased by 20% in the past week, fuelled by illnesses such as the flu.

Share Button

Our daughter died from meningitis after starting uni – a jab would have saved her

Meg Draper was enjoying the social side of student life – within weeks she had died from meningitis.

Share Button

Doctors to stage five-day strike before Christmas

Walkout in England begins on 17 December and will be 14th strike in pay dispute.

Share Button

US and UK agree zero tariffs deal on pharmaceuticals

The deal follows threats of tariffs as high as 100% on branded drug imports.

Share Button

DfE’s Mock Apology Post To Parents Seriously Misread The Room

A Department for Education social media statement went viral, but not in a good way.

The Department published a mock ‘apology’ celebrating the impact of its Breakfast Club initiative.

Unfortunately, instead of sounding human or witty, it read as self-congratulatory and oddly patronising – and within hours, was circulating widely as an example of political comms gone wrong.

As CEO of nanny company Koru Kids, I watched this with dismay for several reasons.

I was saddened because the policy itself is well-evidenced and successful. Breakfast clubs are essential childcare infrastructure, and it’s great that they’ve served over 2.6 million meals. That’s something to celebrate.

But the botched announcement also revealed something deeper about trust, empathy and the currently fragile relationship between families and the state.

One jarring aspect of the statement was its self-congratulatory tone. The government seemed to be taking credit for outcomes actually delivered by exhausted frontline workers.

Breakfast clubs have run because kitchen staff show up at dawn. Childcare works because early years educators absorb the strain every day. Attendance has improved because teachers, SENCOs and safeguarding teams grind constantly.

Parents, too, commented the tone of the statement was ‘off’. One section said the Department’s policy has given parents “alarming amounts of unexpected free time”, suggesting British parents are now luxuriating in extra hours at the spa.

Any parent could tell you this is absurd. Parents use childcare to keep their jobs and put food on the table.

But the humour in these cases was gentle, well-judged, and didn’t punch down.

Satire only works when the audience knows you get them. That’s why your friends can take the mickey out of you, but it’s rude if strangers do – because the jokes have to rest on a base of trust.

Sadly, the Department of Education just has not earned the right to joke about how hard it is to be a parent. They’ve misread the room.

What’s actually happening is that life is becoming ever harder for families.

Brand-new data from Buttle UK shows that 43% of young people in crisis think they might need to drop out of education to work. More than half (55%) of children say they’re sometimes too hungry to learn. 60% of parents can’t afford school shoes. 59% can’t afford uniforms.

Against this backdrop, a joke about parents gaining “unexpected free time” doesn’t just misjudge the tone – it makes people wonder whether policymakers understand what life is like for most people at the moment.

This matters, because we are living through a profound crisis of confidence in institutions.

People reading this statement quite reasonably think, “If they don’t get it, how can we trust them to make policies in our interests?”

Empathy isn’t just a layer of comms you add at the end, it needs to be an integral part of the whole process. When it’s missing, it makes you question the process itself.

And that’s something that really threatens us all.

Rachel Carrell is the CEO of Koru Kids.

Share Button

Advent Has Begun. But What Does That Actually Mean, And Why Do We Have Advent Calendars?

Not to alarm you, but we’re a matter of weeks away from Christmas – and already in Advent.

Advent, which begins on the Sunday closest to November 30, lasts for four weeks. This year, it started on Sunday, November 30; the earliest it can begin is November 27.

But what does Advent mean, and why do we celebrate it?

Advent means “coming”

Per Britannica, Advent comes from the Latin word “Adventus,” meaning “coming”.

In the Christian faith, it refers to the coming of Christ, celebrated at Christmas.

It can also, the BBC shared, be a “time of preparation when Christians think about the second coming of Christ and what they need to do to be ready for his return.”

The dates have not always been the same. For instance, under Bishop Perpetuus of Tours (461–490), Advent used to involve a fasting period which began on November 11.

Advent is linked to the Advent wreath, made from a circle of evergreen leaves used to represent eternal life. There are also four candles, one for each of the Sundays ’til Christmas. Some add a fifth candle that symbolises Jesus Christ.

This final candle, if present, is not usually lit until Christmas begins. The other candles are traditionally lit on each Sunday before Christmas.

Why do we have Advent calendars?

Like Christmas trees, these started out as a German tradition – though Advent calendars took off a little later, in the 19th century.

It was simply a way to count down to Christmas.

Traditional Advent calendars often had Bible verses or pictures, though NPR pointed out Advent calendars weren’t the only way Germans built anticipation at the time – less long-lasting versions included keeping a chalk tally on walls and doors, and placing extra straws in the crib of a Nativity scene.

So, though it took a few decades, perhaps it’s not surprising that German publisher Gerhard Lang is credited with the first printed Advent calendar, as well as the first Advent calendar with doors.

And though the first chocolate version is believed to have been made in the ’50s, it took Cadbury’s about 20 years to make the first mass-produced version in 1971.

Only in the ’90s did demand become high enough for them to keep the calendars in continuous production.

Because Advent does not always begin on December 1, though, they don’t follow the exact dates every year – it is just easier to go 1-25, or 1-24.

Share Button

‘My Boyfriend’s Jokes Started Including Creepy Details. Can I Ever Trust Him Again?’

Though closeness is an important part of a great relationship, the cofounder and COO of Fresh Starts Registry, Genevieve Dreizen, says that privacy is key, too.

“As a person who spends a great deal of time helping people navigate life transitions and emotional crossroads, I always remind people that privacy is not a threat to intimacy,” the etiquette expert said.

In fact, she calls it a “necessary ingredient” for a healthy partnership.

Perhaps that’s why Redditor u/taliv_03 said she feels so “disgusted” after learning that her partner had been rifling through her diary.

Writing to the forum r/TwoHotTakes, the original poster (OP) said that she first suspected him of reading her journal about a month ago, when his jokes about her changed.

Here, we asked Dreizen to weigh in on the tricky situation.

OP’s partner began joking about details only shared in her journal

The poster, a 27-year-old woman, said that her partner (a 29-year-old man) had been together for a little over a year when she noticed the change.

Throughout that period, she had a paper diary that her boyfriend knew about. It is a “non-negotiable” for her, she says; her partner had previously “teased me [about it] once in a sweet way, calling it my ‘brain compost bin.’”

About a month ago, though, she started noticing something strange about her partner’s jokes.

“We were with friends, and he made a joke about how I [research] symptoms for my cat more than for myself… It stung because that exact line was in my journal the night before, word for word,” OP wrote.

“A week later, he told this story to my sister about how I still feel guilty for breaking a snow globe when I was five. I have never told that story out loud, only wrote it down after a therapy session.”

Two nights ago, she said she walked in to see her diary open on a coffee table in front of her. He claimed he had moved it to save it from the cat, she said.

After he mentioned yet another private musing, though, she raised her suspicions with him, “and he got defensive, said I should not write things down if I don’t want them to be ‘found art’, and that I was overreacting because ‘partners should not have secrets.’”

Since then, OP writes, she has felt “disgusted and stupid, like my safe place just got ripped open for someone else’s stand-up routine.

“At the same time, I keep wondering if I am making this bigger than it is. Is reading a partner’s journal and then using their thoughts as jokes a hard deal breaker, or something you can actually rebuild trust from?” she ended.

“This is a boundary violation”

Speaking to HuffPost UK, Dreizen explained: “When a partner reads your diary, they aren’t just crossing a line of etiquette; they are trespassing on the internal space where you tell the truth to yourself. That space is sacred.

“A diary is not a shared document, not a negotiation, not a relationship ledger.”

And when someone snoops in your diary, “You’re dealing with a breach of trust that destabilises the foundation of emotional safety in the relationship.”

It turns a private space into an arena where you suddenly have to worry about leaving yourself open to teasing and jokes, the expert added.

“That kind of emotional exposure can make you question your reality, tiptoe around your own inner world, or feel ashamed of feelings you were never meant to defend.

“The injury is not just about the reading – it’s about the casualness with which your boundaries were dismissed, the entitlement to your inner life, and the refusal to take accountability afterwards.”

For her part, Dreizen said, “The first step is acknowledging that this isn’t a difference in opinion about privacy. This is a boundary violation. The partner’s belief that ‘partners shouldn’t have secrets’ is a misconception wrapped in control.

She said that in this case, repair is only possible once OP’s partner has proven that he understands that he’s wrong and why and has taken concrete steps to change.

Dreizen asked the poster, should she wish to give her partner another try, to say something like, “I’m open to moving forward, but only if you take responsibility without minimising and commit to respecting my boundaries. What steps are you willing to take to make that happen?”

Share Button

WHO warning over shortage of obesity jabs

Too few people who could benefit from so-called “skinny jabs” are able to access them, says WHO.

Share Button