Plants can’t absorb as much CO2 as climate models predicted

High levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are a major driver of climate change. At the same time, increased CO2 can encourage plants to grow faster, allowing them to absorb more carbon and potentially slow warming. That benefit, however, depends on whether plants have access to enough nitrogen, a nutrient that is essential for growth. Scientists have only recently taken a closer look at how much nitrogen is actually available in nature. New research involving the University of Graz shows that the so-called CO2 fertilization effect has been significantly overstated.

Plants cannot use nitrogen on their own. The nutrient must first be converted into a usable form through a process called nitrogen fixation, which relies on microorganisms in the soil. This process takes place in natural ecosystems as well as on farmland. “While this process has been significantly overestimated in nature, it has increased by 75 percent over the past 20 years due to agriculture,” says Bettina Weber, a biologist at the University of Graz, summarizing findings from a study published earlier this year.

Building on those results, a new analysis shows that the way nitrogen fixation is calculated in some Earth System models has now been reassessed. These models are widely used to project climate trends and inform major assessments, including the World Climate Report. The updated findings were published in the scientific journal PNAS.

New Findings Prompt Climate Model Revisions

The study was led by Sian Kou-Giesbrecht of Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, Canada. The work was carried out by an international research group focused on biological nitrogen fixation, which includes Bettina Weber. This working group receives support from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) John Wesley Powell Centre for Analysis and Synthesis.

“We compared different Earth System models with current nitrogen fixation values and found that they overestimate the nitrogen fixation rate on natural surfaces by about 50 percent,” Weber explains. Because plants depend on this process to access nitrogen, the overestimate has meaningful consequences. According to the study, it results in an overall reduction of about 11 percent in the projected CO2 fertilization effect.

Why Updating Models Is Critical

Weber emphasizes the importance of adjusting climate models to reflect these updated measurements. “This is because gases such as nitrogen oxides and nitrous oxide are produced as part of the nitrogen cycle. These can be released into the atmosphere through conversion processes and alter or disrupt climate processes.” Accurately accounting for nitrogen dynamics, she says, is essential for making reliable predictions about how ecosystems and the climate will respond in the future.

Share Button

Surgeon who ‘stripped naked in cubicle’ struck off

The doctor was working at the Queen Alexandra Hospital in Portsmouth when the incidents happened.

Share Button

Junk food TV and online advert ban comes into force

Soft drinks, chocolate, pizzas and ice creams will be targeted in the UK government’s plan.

Share Button

The myth of willpower – and why some people struggle to lose weight more than others

Thousands of genes that have an influence on weight, say experts – which means weight loss isn’t a level playing field

Share Button

The Surprising Health Benefits Of Swearing

I am a Scouser living in Glasgow which means you can assume three things about me: my family are aggressively working class, I have a soft spot for dockyards and I LOVE to swear.

I don’t even think about it, it’s just so enjoyable. Nothing quite punctuates a sentence like a healthy f-bomb and getting into a healthy gossip session absolutely requires being able to dish out the delicious c-word.

However, I do know that for some people, it can be offputting and make them uncomfortable. I’m careful in polite company and wouldn’t ever want to make somebody needlessly uncomfortable so I had planned to tame my spicy tongue a little until I heard that actually, swearing is good for your health.

How does swearing benefit your health?

Writing for The Conversation, Michelle Spear, a Professor of Anatomy, University of Bristol says: “Research shows that a well-placed expletive can dull pain, regulate the heart and help the body recover from stress. The occasional outburst, it seems, isn’t a moral failure – it’s a protective reflex wired into us.”

Ever screamed some expletitives after stubbing your toe? That probably helped your body out. Wild.

Spear continues: “Recent research shows that swearing can actually change how much pain people can handle. A 2024 review looked at studies on swearing’s pain-reducing effects and found consistent evidence that people who repeated taboo words could keep their hands in icy water significantly longer than those who repeated neutral words.

“Another 2024 report found that swearing can also increase physical strength during certain tasks, further supporting the idea that the body’s response is real rather than merely psychological.”

So, while for us it can feel emotional, it appears that swearing is much more

Have you ever had devastating news and screamed out loud, feeling that if you didn’t, it would just build up in your chest, begging for release? Spear explains that swearing is beneficial here, too.

“Swearing also helps the body recover from sudden stress. When shocked or hurt, the hypothalamus and pituitary release adrenaline and cortisol into the bloodstream, preparing the body to react.

“If this energy surge isn’t released, the nervous system can remain in a heightened state, linked to anxiety, sleep difficulties, weakened immunity and extra strain on the heart.”

Fuck it, let it all out.

Share Button

I’m A Writer Who Is Beginning To Lose Her Words. I’m Terrified Of What Will Happen Next.

I should’ve known it was coming for me – the fog, the forgetting, the cognitive impairment. My father, his brother, their mother, their grandmother all had it… I just didn’t expect how it would come for me.

At 54, it seems my forgetting is linked to a neurodegenerative disease. But even before my own memory and language issues began, I’d written about and wondered what my own neurological inheritance might be.

In 1981, I spent several afternoons in the peacefully lamp-lit office of an elderly, retired professor and child psychologist and underwent a variety of aptitude tests and personality assessments. It turned out I was a “highly sensitive” 5th grader with the vocabulary of a high school senior.

While most of the kids in my Midwestern neighbourhood rode their bikes, played flag football and Frogger, I was tucked away reading book after book. When I ran out of books, I’d spend entire afternoons seated cross-legged on the floor, poring over the pages of a set of hand-me-down Encyclopedia Britannicas. I dog-eared pages. I made notes in the margins on the Dalai Lama, the Great Alaska Earthquake of 1964 that registered a 9.2 on the Richter scale, and gladiolus — one of August’s (my) birth flowers that my paternal grandmother grew in her 4-H award-winning garden.

I’ve loved and collected words like treasures for as long as I can remember.

In March 2023, I started experiencing marked muscle weakness in several areas, most noticeably my left forearm. With any exertion, the muscles rippled beneath the skin, and my finger strokes on the keyboard weren’t landing as efficiently as they once had. Words were missing letters: Knoledge. Languge. Mariage.

My struggle with short-term memory increased. I mixed up words in conversation, and it felt like words I’d used frequently had been stowed away on shelves in my brain that I could no longer reach. Then came things like walking out of the kitchen with the faucet running, leaving the refrigerator door open, forgetting the stove burners were on and, recently, putting a container of yogurt in the drawer with my Pyrex lids.

The next few months brought resting tremors and trouble swallowing. My speech grew sluggish in the evenings when I was most fatigued. Now, I’m also experiencing more consistent, significant autonomic dysfunction, with a myriad of other symptoms.

In May 2024, almost exactly two years after I’d completed my midlife MFA in creative writing at 50, I was diagnosed with mild to moderate cognitive impairment. This brain – which I’ve filled with 10 years of study in higher education, ideas for essays, books yet to be written, language, memories of my children, their children, my parents when we were all much younger – is forgetting.

"This photo is from my hooding ceremony when I received my first masters degree in my 40s."

Courtesy of S.C. Beckner

“This photo is from my hooding ceremony when I received my first masters degree in my 40s.”

The first results read something like, “On the WMS-IV Logical Memory Subtest, immediate recall for two short stories was in the low average range. Delayed recall was impaired. Retention of information was impaired. On a 15-word list-learning task (RAVLT), she demonstrated a fluctuated learning curve and an impaired total learning score. Immediate recall was impaired. Delayed recall was impaired. Phonemic verbal fluency (FAS) was impaired. Semantic verbal fluency was impaired.” Impaired. Impaired. Impaired. Where did my words go?

The most recent results revealed “frontal subcortical dysfunction likely consistent with Multiple System Atrophy” – the neurodegenerative disease I was diagnosed with late last summer. Multiple System Atrophy, or MSA, is like if the worst forms of Parkinson’s Disease and ALS bore offspring. There’s no cure, and little treatment. It’s considered a terminal diagnosis with a life expectancy of five to eight years from symptom onset, maybe 10 if you’re… lucky? I’ve been told and read that every patient progresses differently. I’m nearing the three-year mark since my initial symptoms started.

I rebel against the forgetting, rebel against the losing – when I remember to. I pray. I meditate. I play word games on my cell phone well into most nights, as I’ve lost the ability to sleep for more than an hour or two in a stretch. Scrabble. Wordle. Words with Friends. Word Stacks. I work to sharpen the edges of my dulled memory, preserve what’s still firing in my brain, and search for the words that have already been wiped clean from the slate of my brain.

How many words could I spell with the letters V O I D E N? Void. Vine. Vino. Din. Dive. Ion. Dove. Done. Nod. Id. End. I plugged the letters into allscrabblewords.com to see how many I’ve missed. The site lists 55 words for that letter combination. I found 11.

Everything is different now. Each day arrives with some measure of frustration and fragility. When I have the capacity, I make lists of words that I most want to remember: Fecund. Cacophony. Loquacious. Serendipity.

My words, thoughts, and ideas are now submerged deep in a vat of midnight dark molasses and some days I can no longer retrieve them. They’re buried so deeply, and I am tired – brain thick with fog, limbs heavy as though they’ve been dipped in concrete. I know the words are still there – they have to be. I’ve studied and loved them for so long.

As a writer, storyteller, teacher, and someone who loves to be in conversation, the idea of losing those things is almost unbearable at times. In 20 years of marriage, I’ve written letters to my husband. In the beginning, letters of love and wanting, and more recently, letters of apology, request, and reflection.

I’m sorry you ended up with a sick wife.

The fear of the future washes over me and I can’t imagine the language and words that have made me who I am will be gone.

The author at her desk in 2022.

Courtesy of S.C. Beckner

The author at her desk in 2022.

In recent months, I’ve felt like the light of who I am is maybe starting to dim. I know that sounds dramatic, but I don’t know how else to describe it. I continue to try to write something every day, each word, every cohesive sentence – another rebellion. Whether it’s working on bits and pieces of a new essay or article I’ve had an idea for, trying to write new copy for a work project, or a journal prompt, I tell myself I have to keep writing. My desk houses stacks of Post-it notes and shards of scrap paper with scrawled notes, ideas, and words I don’t want to forget.

Some days, a paragraph might take several hours. Other days, I crank out sentence after sentence, only to return to the page to find missing words and ideas that don’t quite make sense or a story told out of order. Losing language, intellect, and what I’ve worked so hard to learn is like losing pieces of the woman I’ve worked so hard to become post full-time motherhood – a part of who I’ve always been, yet only recently had the opportunity to discover.

I hold onto my language, cradle the words I still have close to my chest like I once held my children, now long grown and living all over the country. I hold the words close like I once held those encyclopaedias while I read, then returned to them again and again. Alongside the words, I think of the faces of my children and their children. I imagine them older. In my own forgetting, I hope not to be forgotten, so I leave pieces of myself behind on the page.

S.C. Beckner is a freelance copywriter, essayist, and editor. Her work can be found at Salon, Business Insider, NBC Think, as well as other platforms and literary publications. S.C. is currently working on her memoir in essays. She lives in coastal North Carolina with her dog.

Do you have a compelling personal story you’d like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we’re looking for here and send us a pitch at pitch@huffpost.com.

Share Button

Trevor Phillips Rips Into Labour’s Response To Trump’s Venezuela Action

Sky presenter Trevor Phillips has torn into Labour’s lacklustre response to Donald Trump’s military action in Venezuela.

The US seized Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and indicted him on narco-terrorism conspiracy on Saturday.

Trump has declared that the States will “run” Venezuela until there can be a safe transition of power – and insisted the US will be “very strongly involved” in the country’s oil industry.

Keir Starmer has already refused to describe Trump’s moves as a breach of international law, insisting the government “sheds no tears” for the end of Maduro’s autocracy.

But concerns about what this means for the world order remain.

On Sky News, Phillips told chief secretary to the prime minister Darren Jones that Trump’s decision to seize Venezuela sounds rather like “colonialism”.

He added: “Are we now in favour of colonialism?”

“We’re not in favour of colonialism,” Jones replied, adding: “We’re not entirely clear yet what president Trump meant by those comments yesterday.”

Phillips said: “The president’s been pretty clear: he said we are going to run Venezuela. We will decide when we can stop running Venezuela and pass on power in a ‘judicious’ way. It’s pretty clear.

“We must have a view on that, surely.”

Jones said the UK does not know the “details” of what is happening yet, adding: “It would be wrong for government ministers to try to make assumptions or to comment on hypotheticals about the future.”

He continued: “We should understand what is happening before we comment, that’s what the public would expect a grown-up professional government to do.”

Phillips said: “I don’t think so. I think the public would expect a grown up government to be consistent.”

He claimed that if it had been any country other than the US – like Russia – the government would have condemned it.

“Is it OK for allies to march in and snatch someone every time they think they’ve done something naughty?” The presenter asked.

Jones said: “The UK respects international law and the rules-based order. We are an advocate for it, we conduct ourselves on that basis, and we expect other countries to do so as well. There’s no question about that.

“What happened in Venezula has happened. We now need to move as quickly as possible.”

Jones also insisted that the UK has not been involved with the US’s attacks on Venezuela at all, but that Britain does support a peaceful transition of power.

Asked about whether it was a breach of international law, Jones said: “It’s for the Americans to set out the legal basis for their operation, not Nato, not ours in any way, I don’t think the Americans have done that yet, but I’m sure they will do in due course.”

Phillips pointed out that the government made a judgement that Putins’ invasion of Ukraine was unlawful, but Jones replied: “It’s not for me or any opposition politician to make a judgement on that.”

Share Button

Type 2 diabetes physically changes the human heart, study finds

Researchers at the University of Sydney have uncovered new evidence showing that type 2 diabetes directly changes the heart’s structure and how it produces energy. These findings help explain why people living with diabetes face a much higher risk of developing heart failure.

The study, published in EMBO Molecular Medicine, was led by Dr. Benjamin Hunter and Associate Professor Sean Lal from the School of Medical Sciences. The team examined donated human heart tissue from patients receiving heart transplants in Sydney, comparing it with tissue from healthy donors. Their analysis revealed that diabetes drives specific molecular changes inside heart cells and alters the physical makeup of heart muscle. These effects were most pronounced in patients with ischemia cardiomyopathy, which is the leading cause of heart failure.

“We’ve long seen a correlation between heart disease and type 2 diabetes,” said Dr. Hunter, “but this is the first research to jointly look at diabetes and ischemia heart disease and uncover a unique molecular profile in people with both conditions.

“Our findings show that diabetes alters how the heart produces energy, maintains its structure under stress, and contracts to pump blood. Using advanced microscopy techniques, we were able to see direct changes to the heart muscle as a result of this, in the form of a build-up of fibrous tissue.”

Heart disease remains the leading cause of death in Australia, and more than 1.2 million Australians are living with type 2 diabetes.

Associate Professor Lal said: “Our research links heart disease and diabetes in ways that have never been demonstrated in humans, offering new insights into potential treatment strategies that could one day benefit millions of people in Australia and globally.”

Looking Inside Diseased Human Hearts

To better understand how diabetes affects the heart, the researchers studied heart tissue from both transplant recipients and healthy individuals. This direct examination allowed them to see how diabetes influences heart biology in real human patients rather than relying solely on animal models.

The results showed that diabetes is more than a co-morbidity for heart disease. It actively accelerates heart failure by interfering with essential biological processes and reshaping heart muscle at the microscopic level.

“The metabolic effect of diabetes in the heart is not fully understood in humans,” said Dr. Hunter.

How Diabetes Disrupts the Heart’s Energy Supply

In healthy hearts, energy is mainly generated from fats, with glucose and ketones also contributing. Previous research has shown that glucose use increases during heart failure. However, diabetes interferes with this process by reducing how sensitive heart cells are to insulin.

“Under healthy conditions, the heart primarily uses fats but also glucose and ketones as fuel for energy. It has previously been described that glucose uptake is increased in heart failure, however, diabetes reduces the insulin sensitivity of glucose transporters — proteins that move glucose in and out of cells — in heart muscle cells.

“We observed that diabetes worsens the molecular characteristics of heart failure in patients with advanced heart disease and increases the stress on mitochondria — the powerhouse of the cell which produces energy.”

Structural Damage and Fibrosis in the Heart Muscle

Beyond energy production, the researchers found that diabetes affects the proteins responsible for heart muscle contraction and calcium regulation. In patients with both diabetes and ischemic heart disease, these proteins were produced at lower levels. At the same time, excess fibrous tissue accumulated within the heart, making the muscle stiffer and less able to pump blood efficiently.

“RNA sequencing confirmed that many of these protein changes were also reflected at the gene transcription level, particularly in pathways related to energy metabolism and tissue structure, which reinforces our other observations,” said Dr. Hunter.

“And once we had these clues at the molecular level, we were able to confirm these structural changes using confocal microscopy.”

Implications for Future Treatment and Care

Associate Professor Lal said identifying mitochondrial dysfunction and fibrosis-related pathways opens the door to new treatment approaches.

“Now that we’ve linked diabetes and heart disease at the molecular level and observed how it changes energy production in the heart while also changing its structure, we can begin to explore new treatment avenues,” he said.

“Our findings could also be used to inform diagnosis criteria and disease management strategies across cardiology and endocrinology, improving care for millions of patients.”

Share Button

Scientists found a way to help aging guts heal themselves

Many people notice that certain foods become harder to tolerate with age. One possible reason is damage to the intestinal epithelium, a thin, single layer of cells that lines the intestine. This lining is essential for digestion and overall gut health. In healthy conditions, the intestinal epithelium renews itself every three to five days. Aging or exposure to cancer radiation can disrupt this renewal process, slowing or stopping regeneration altogether. When that happens, inflammation can rise and conditions such as leaky gut syndrome may develop.

Scientists at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) have now identified a promising way to jump-start intestinal repair. Their strategy relies on CAR T-cell therapy, a powerful form of immunotherapy best known for treating certain cancers. By applying this approach to the gut, the researchers hope to open the door to future clinical trials aimed at improving intestinal health, particularly in people affected by age-related decline.

Targeting Aging Cells That Refuse to Die

This work builds on earlier research led by CSHL Assistant Professor Corina Amor Vegas, whose laboratory studies cellular senescence. As the body ages, it accumulates senescent cells, which no longer divide but also do not die off. These lingering cells have been linked to many age-related conditions, including diabetes and dementia. In earlier studies, Amor Vegas and her team engineered immune cells known as anti-uPAR CAR T cells that selectively remove senescent cells in mice, leading to major improvements in the animals’ metabolism.

The researchers next asked whether removing senescent cells could help restore the intestine’s ability to heal. Amor Vegas partnered with CSHL Assistant Professor Semir Beyaz and graduate student Onur Eskiocak to investigate. They delivered CAR T cells directly to the intestines of both younger and older mice. According to Amor Vegas, the results were striking. “In both cases, we see really significant improvements,” she says. “They’re able to absorb nutrients better. They have much less inflammation. When irritated or injured, their epithelial lining is able to regenerate and heal much faster.”

Protection Against Radiation-Induced Gut Damage

Leaky gut syndrome is particularly common among cancer patients who receive pelvic or abdominal radiation therapy. To model this, the team exposed mice to radiation that damaged their intestinal epithelial cells. Mice treated with CAR T cells recovered far more effectively than those that did not receive the therapy. Notably, a single dose of CAR T-cell treatment continued to support healthier gut function for at least one year.

The researchers also found compelling evidence that anti-uPAR CAR T cells encourage regeneration in human intestinal and colorectal cells, Eskiocak notes. While the precise biological mechanisms behind this effect are still being explored, the findings point to strong therapeutic potential. Beyaz emphasizes the broader significance of the work. “This is one good step toward a long journey in understanding how we can better heal the elderly,” he said.

Share Button

A weak body clock may be an early warning for dementia

  • A large new study suggests the body’s internal clock, known as circadian rhythm, may play an important role in dementia risk.
  • More than 2,000 older adults wore small monitors for about 12 days, allowing researchers to closely track daily patterns of rest and activity.
  • People whose body clocks were weaker or more irregular were significantly more likely to develop dementia over the following years.
  • Those whose activity levels peaked later in the day, rather than earlier, showed a 45% higher risk of dementia.
  • Researchers say future studies exploring circadian rhythm approaches such as light exposure or lifestyle changes could reveal new ways to reduce dementia risk.

Weaker Body Clocks Linked to Dementia Risk

A new study suggests that disruptions in the body’s internal clock may be tied to a higher risk of dementia. Research published on December 29, 2025, in Neurology, the medical journal of the American Academy of Neurology, found that people with weaker and more irregular circadian rhythms were more likely to develop dementia. The study also showed that individuals whose daily activity levels peaked later in the day faced a higher risk than those who peaked earlier. While these findings reveal a strong link, they do not show that circadian rhythm changes directly cause dementia.

What Circadian Rhythms Do in the Body

Circadian rhythm refers to the body’s natural timing system. It controls the 24-hour sleep-wake cycle and helps regulate key functions such as hormone release, digestion, and body temperature. This internal clock is directed by the brain and responds to environmental signals, especially light.

When circadian rhythms are strong, the body stays closely aligned with the daily cycle of light and dark. This leads to consistent patterns of sleep and activity, even when schedules or seasons change. In contrast, weaker rhythms make the body clock more sensitive to disruptions. People with less stable rhythms are more likely to shift their sleep and activity times due to changes in routine or daylight.

Aging, Circadian Changes, and Dementia

“Changes in circadian rhythms happen with aging, and evidence suggests that circadian rhythm disturbances may be a risk factor for neurodegenerative diseases like dementia,” said study author Wendy Wang, MPH, PhD, of the Peter O’Donnell Jr. School of Public Health at UT Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, Texas. “Our study measured these rest-activity rhythms and found people with weaker and more fragmented rhythms, and people with activity levels that peaked later in the day, had an elevated risk of dementia.”

Who Took Part in the Study

The research followed 2,183 adults with an average age of 79 who did not have dementia when the study began. Among the participants, 24% were Black people and 76% were white people.

Each participant wore a small heart monitor attached to the chest for an average of 12 days. These devices tracked periods of rest and activity, allowing researchers to analyze circadian rhythm patterns. Participants were then monitored for about three years. During that time, 176 people were diagnosed with dementia.

How Researchers Measured Rhythm Strength

Scientists examined the heart monitor data using several indicators of circadian rhythm strength. One key measure was relative amplitude, which reflects the difference between a person’s most active and least active times of day. Higher relative amplitude indicated a stronger and more clearly defined daily rhythm.

Participants were divided into three groups based on rhythm strength. When comparing the strongest and weakest groups, 31 of the 728 people in the high rhythm group developed dementia, while 106 of the 727 people in the low rhythm group did. After accounting for factors such as age, blood pressure, and heart disease, researchers found that those in the weakest rhythm group had nearly two and a half times the risk of dementia. Each standard deviation drop in relative amplitude was linked to a 54% increase in dementia risk.

Later Activity Peaks and Higher Risk

The timing of daily activity also appeared to matter. People whose activity peaked later in the afternoon, at 2:15 p.m. or later, had a higher risk of dementia than those whose activity peaked earlier, between 1:11 p.m.-2:14 p.m. About 7% of participants in the earlier peak group developed dementia, compared with 10% in the later peak group, representing a 45% higher risk.

A later activity peak may reflect a mismatch between the body’s internal clock and environmental signals such as daylight and darkness.

Why Disrupted Rhythms Might Matter

“Disruptions in circadian rhythms may alter body processes like inflammation, and may interfere with sleep, possibly increasing amyloid plaques linked to dementia, or reducing amyloid clearance from the brain,” said Wang. “Future studies should examine the potential role of circadian rhythm interventions, such as light therapy or lifestyle changes, to determine if they may help lower a person’s risk of dementia.”

Study Limitations

One limitation of the research is that it did not include data on sleep disorders, such as sleep apnea, which could have influenced the results.

Share Button