Six Things You Should Know Before Travelling Abroad For Surgery

Around 523,000 people from the UK travelled abroad for surgery in 2024, with the most popular destinations for ‘medical tourism’ being Turkey, Poland and Romania, according to data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

People might travel abroad for treatments such as dental and cosmetic surgery, cancer treatment, weight loss surgery, fertility treatment, organ transplants and stem cell therapy, according to experts at TravelHealthPro.

Transgender travellers may seek hormone therapy and gender reassignment surgery abroad,” they added.

The growth in medical tourism appears to stem from a mixture of factors, including higher disposable incomes, increased readiness to travel for health care, low-cost air travel and the expansion of internet marketing, TravelHealthPro said.

NHS waiting lists have also been growing in recent years, though NHS England noted it delivered more elective activity in 2025 than any other year in its history, “helping cut the waiting list to its lowest level since February 2023”.

If you’re one of the many people tempted to go abroad for surgery or treatment, Qian Huang, international claims manager at William Russell, has shared some key considerations below.

What you need to know before travelling abroad for surgery

“The idea of having surgery abroad can be nerve-wracking, particularly when it comes to questions of safety,” Huang said.

“Many people considering surgery abroad decide not to go because of concerns about safety, the quality of the medical care, or not understanding the foreign healthcare system.

“However, in reality, many international hospitals and clinics follow standards of care that match or exceed those found in the UK, US, or Europe. The key is knowing what to look for.”

How to find an accredited hospital abroad

Medical accreditations are a key indicator of a hospital’s commitment to international standards.

One of the most widely recognised is the Joint Commission International (JCI) accreditation, often considered the global gold standard, which evaluates hospitals on areas such as infection prevention, medication safety, staff training, patient communication, and emergency readiness.

To find an accredited hospital abroad, patients can check official accreditation bodies’ websites, verify information on hospital websites, contact the facility directly, or consult medical tourism networks and national health authorities.

What to check before booking surgery

To steer clear of issues, Huang shared six factors to be aware of before booking surgery abroad.

1. Lack of accreditation or vague claims

“Be wary of hospitals that mention ‘world-class standards’ without naming an actual accrediting body,” he said. “Reputable facilities will proudly display credentials from recognised organisations like JCI, ACHSI, or Temos.”

2. ‘Too good to be true’ pricing

Competitive pricing is probably one of the top reasons people consider surgery abroad, but Huang warned ultra-low prices should raise alarm bells.

Check the qualifications of the surgeon, what’s included in the cost, and whether the aftercare and follow-up appointments are covered, he added.

3. Poor communication or pressure tactics

If you’re struggling to get clear answers from the hospital or feel rushed into making a decision, consider taking a step back. Trustworthy providers are transparent, patient, and more than happy to talk you through the details.

4. No clear aftercare plan

Recovery is just as important as the procedure itself. A good hospital will give you a personalised aftercare plan, including advice on travel, medication, and any physical restrictions, before you agree to surgery.

5. Inconsistent or missing reviews

Take the time to search for independent reviews and testimonials before considering which hospital to have the surgery at. A complete lack of online feedback, or reviews that sound overly scripted, can be a red flag.

6. Limited information about the surgical team

When researching your hospital, you should be able to find the names, qualifications, and experience of the surgeons who’ll be treating you. If this information is unavailable or unclear, you need to proceed with caution.

Share Button

“Celtic curse” hotspots found in Scotland and Ireland with 1 in 54 at risk

People with roots in the Outer Hebrides and north west Ireland face the highest known risk of developing hemochromatosis, a genetic disorder that causes the body to absorb and store too much iron. Over time, that excess iron can build up to dangerous levels.

This is the first time researchers have mapped genetic risk for hemochromatosis, sometimes called the ‘Celtic curse’, across the UK and Ireland. The condition has long been known to affect Scottish and Irish populations at higher rates, but until now its geographic distribution had not been clearly charted.

Experts say the findings could help health officials focus genetic screening in the areas most affected, allowing people at risk to be identified earlier and treated before serious complications develop.

Iron Overload Can Damage Organs Over Decades

Hemochromatosis often develops slowly. Excess iron can accumulate in organs for years or even decades before symptoms appear. If left untreated, it can lead to liver damage, liver cancer, arthritis, and other serious health problems. Early diagnosis makes a major difference. Regular blood donation to lower iron levels is a simple and effective treatment that can prevent much of the harm.

The disease is caused by inherited changes in DNA known as genetic variants. In the UK and Ireland, the main risk factor is a variant called C282Y.

Researchers at the University of Edinburgh analyzed genetic information from more than 400,000 people who took part in the UK BioBank and Viking Genes studies. They examined how common the C282Y variant was in 29 regions across the British Isles and Ireland.

Where the C282Y Gene Variant Is Most Common

The highest rates were found among people with ancestry from north west Ireland, where about one in 54 people are estimated to carry the variant. The Outer Hebrides followed closely at one in 62, and Northern Ireland at one in 71.

Mainland Scotland also showed elevated risk, particularly in Glasgow and southwest Scotland. In those areas, about one in 117 people carry the variant, reinforcing the long standing ‘Celtic Curse’ nickname.

Because the combined genetic risk is so high in these regions, researchers say targeted screening there would likely identify the greatest number of people with the condition.

Diagnosis Patterns and Possible Under Detection

The team also reviewed NHS England records and found more than 70,000 diagnosed cases of hemochromatosis. White Irish individuals were nearly four times more likely to be diagnosed than white British individuals.

Among white British individuals, those living in Liverpool were 11 times more likely to have a diagnosis than people in Kent. Researchers suggest this may reflect historical Irish migration, as more than 20 percent of Liverpool’s population was Irish in the 1850s.

In general, diagnosis rates in England mirror the pattern of genetic risk. However, Birmingham, Cumbria, Northumberland and Durham reported fewer cases than expected based on their genetic profiles. These areas may have undetected cases and could benefit from expanded screening efforts.

Comparable NHS prevalence data were not available for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, so those regions were not included in that portion of the analysis.

The study was funded by the charity Haemochromatosis-UK and conducted in partnership with RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences. It was published in Nature Communications.

Calls for Community Wide Genetic Screening

Professor Jim Flett Wilson, Chair of Human Genetics at the University of Edinburgh, said: “If untreated, the iron-overload disease hemochromatosis can lead to liver cancer, arthritis and other poor outcomes. We have shown that the risk in the Hebrides and Northern Ireland is much higher than previously thought, with about one in every 60 people at risk, about half of whom will develop the disease. Early detection prevents most of the adverse consequences and a simple treatment — giving blood — is available. The time has come to plan for community-wide genetic screening in these high-risk areas, to identify as many people as possible whose genes mean they are at high risk of this preventable illness.”

Jonathan Jelley MBE JP, CEO of Haemochromatosis UK, said: “Although there are other forms and genotypes that can lead to iron overload, available research indicates C282Y presents as the greatest risk. This hugely important work has the potential to lead to greater targeted awareness, increased diagnosis and better treatment pathways for thousands of people affected by genetic hemochromatosis.

“As a charity we have already begun work on targeting and prioritizing hotspot areas of the UK for support including with our National Helpline and clinician education. Using this study we will continue to campaign for better allocation of public resources to this preventable condition that is all too often overlooked.”

Torcuil Crichton, the Labour MP for Na h-Eileanan an Iar (the Western Isles), has hemochromatosis and backs the push for screening in the Western Isles.

Torcuil Crichton MP said: “This research writes the case for community-wide screening in the Western Isles, Northern Ireland, and other hemochromatosis hotspots. I have previously raised this with Ministers in the House of Commons and this new evidence ought to be enough to persuade the UK National Screening Committee to review its position and approve a pilot screening program. The Western Isles offers a contained and distinct population sample to start from.

“Early identification, which I was lucky to have, means a whole range of bad health outcomes can be avoided and I’ll be urging Ministers and the Screening Committee to reconsider their stance.”

Share Button

Scientists discover why high altitude protects against diabetes

For years, researchers have observed that people who live at high elevations, where oxygen is scarce, tend to develop diabetes less often than those at sea level. Although the trend was well documented, the biological explanation behind it was unclear.

Scientists at Gladstone Institutes now say they have identified the reason. Their research shows that in low oxygen environments, red blood cells begin absorbing large amounts of glucose from the bloodstream. In effect, the cells act like sugar sponges under conditions similar to those found on the world’s tallest mountains.

In findings published in Cell Metabolism, the team demonstrated that red blood cells can alter their metabolism when oxygen levels drop. This shift allows the cells to deliver oxygen to tissues more efficiently at high altitude. At the same time, it lowers circulating blood sugar, offering a potential explanation for reduced diabetes risk.

According to senior author Isha Jain, PhD, a Gladstone Investigator, core investigator at Arc Institute, and professor of biochemistry at UC San Francisco, the study resolves a longstanding question in physiology.

“Red blood cells represent a hidden compartment of glucose metabolism that has not been appreciated until now,” Jain says. “This discovery could open up entirely new ways to think about controlling blood sugar.”

Red Blood Cells Identified as a Glucose Sink

Jain’s lab has spent years studying hypoxia, the term for reduced oxygen levels in the blood, and its effects on metabolism. In earlier experiments, her team noticed that mice exposed to low oxygen air had dramatically lower blood glucose levels. The animals rapidly cleared sugar from their bloodstream after eating, which is typically linked to lower diabetes risk. However, when researchers examined major organs to determine where the glucose was being used, they found no clear answer.

“When we gave sugar to the mice in hypoxia, it disappeared from their bloodstream almost instantly,” says Yolanda Martí-Mateos, PhD, a postdoctoral scholar in Jain’s lab and first author of the new study. “We looked at muscle, brain, liver — all the usual suspects — but nothing in these organs could explain what was happening.”

Using a different imaging method, the researchers discovered that red blood cells were serving as the missing “glucose sink,” meaning they were taking in and using significant amounts of glucose from circulation. This was unexpected because red blood cells have traditionally been viewed as simple oxygen carriers.

Follow up experiments in mice confirmed the finding. Under low oxygen conditions, the animals produced more red blood cells overall, and each individual cell absorbed more glucose compared with cells formed under normal oxygen levels.

To uncover the molecular details behind this shift, Jain’s group partnered with Angelo D’Alessandro, PhD, of the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, and Allan Doctor, MD, from University of Maryland, who has long studied red blood cell biology.

Their work showed that when oxygen is limited, red blood cells use glucose to generate a molecule that helps release oxygen to tissues. This process becomes especially important when oxygen is in short supply.

“What surprised me most was the magnitude of the effect,” D’Alessandro says. “Red blood cells are usually thought of as passive oxygen carriers. Yet, we found that they can account for a substantial fraction of whole-body glucose consumption, especially under hypoxia.”

Implications for Diabetes Treatment

The researchers also found that the metabolic benefits of prolonged hypoxia lasted for weeks to months after mice were returned to normal oxygen levels.

They then evaluated HypoxyStat, a drug recently developed in Jain’s lab that mimics low oxygen exposure. HypoxyStat is taken as a pill and works by causing hemoglobin in red blood cells to bind oxygen more tightly, limiting the amount delivered to tissues. In mouse models of diabetes, the medication completely reversed high blood sugar and outperformed existing treatments.

“This is one of the first use of HypoxyStat beyond mitochondrial disease,” Jain says. “It opens the door to thinking about diabetes treatment in a fundamentally different way — by recruiting red blood cells as glucose sinks.”

The findings may also apply beyond diabetes. D’Alessandro notes potential relevance for exercise physiology and for pathological hypoxia after traumatic injury. Trauma remains a leading cause of death among younger people, and changes in red blood cell production and metabolism could affect glucose availability and muscle performance.

“This is just the beginning,” Jain says. “There’s still so much to learn about how the whole body adapts to changes in oxygen, and how we could leverage these mechanisms to treat a range of conditions.”

Study Details and Funding

The study, titled “Red Blood Cells Serve as a Primary Glucose Sink to Improve Glucose Tolerance at Altitude,” appeared in Cell Metabolism on February 19, 2026. The authors include Yolanda Martí-Mateos, Ayush D. Midha, Will R. Flanigan, Tej Joshi, Helen Huynh, Brandon R. Desousa, Skyler Y. Blume, Alan H. Baik, and Isha Jain of Gladstone; Zohreh Safari, Stephen Rogers, and Allan Doctor of University of Maryland; and Shaun Bevers, Aaron V. Issaian, and Angelo D’Alessandro of University of Colorado Anschutz.

Funding was provided by the National Institutes of Health (DP5 DP5OD026398, R01 HL161071, R01 HL173540, R01HL146442, R01HL149714, DP5OD026398), the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Dave Wentz, the Hillblom Foundation, and the W.M. Keck Foundation.

Share Button

‘Poo Plumes’ In Public Toilets Are All Too Real. Here’s How To Avoid Them.

Using a public toilet is rarely a joyous occasion. They’re filled with sights and smells that can strike fear in the hardest of hearts (and stomachs), and still, most of us have to venture into them at some point if we ever want to live a life outside of our homes.

So how can we make our time in a public bathroom better or safer or, at the very least, less gross?

That’s what we – that’s Raj Punjabi and Noah Michelson, hosts of HuffPost’s Am I Doing It Wrong? podcast – asked microbiologist Jason Tetro, aka The Germ Guy, to school us on when he dropped by our studio.

“Every time I talk about toilet seats and toilets, I’m always saying, ‘Well, it’s not germy – everything is germier than a toilet seat,’” Tetro told us. “[I’m basing that on] studies that were done back in the 1970s and controlled laboratory environments that were mimicking the home… [but those toilets] also had a lid.”

That lid, which is absent from the vast majority of toilets in public restrooms, is key, he said, to containing what scientists call a “poo plume” – the droplets and aerosol particles that can spray up to six feet out of the toilet when we flush.

“As a result of [there not being a lid], there’s that plume that comes from the toilet that ends up on the seat, and no matter where you go, you’re always going to find that about 50% of the [public restroom] toilet seats at any given time are going to have some kind of poo germs on them in the range of
hundreds [of particles],” he said.

Those poo particles can contain E. coli, salmonella, or even norovirus, all of which, if present in high enough concentrations, can make us sick – but not from sitting on the toilet seat.

“We do see potentially some low level of all sorts of different types of bacteria and viruses that could potentially cause an infection, but the reality is, unless you have a cut, then there’s really no opportunity for that to get into your skin to cause a problem,” Tetro, the author of The Germ Files and The Germ Code, explained.

However, droplets in the air are a different matter altogether. That’s why he says flushing the toilet is the first thing he does before using it to “get a fresh” bowl and he never stays in the stall after flushing.

“Make sure that you kind of get out of the stall for 30 seconds to let whatever was aerosol or the droplets to fall and then you can go back in,” he said, noting that he actually does this himself before he uses a toilet in a public restroom.

“So here’s the problem: if it’s norovirus or some of the more really troublesome bacteria like E.coli 0157:H7, then you may actually end up getting exposed to a high enough level that it could potentially cause infection,” he warned.

That’s because the droplets from the plume could land in your mouth or nose – which is even more of a danger if you’re standing in close proximity to a public restroom toilet that features an extremely powerful flusher.

“So if you’re gonna go for the clean or for the fresh bowl, make sure that your face is nowhere near that plume,” he added.

Once you’ve finished your business, don’t stick around in the stall after you’ve flushed either – unless you want to be showered by a plume of your own poo particles.

We also chatted with Tetro about the germiest part of a public restroom (spoiler: it’s not the toilet seat), what to do if there’s no soap in the bathroom, and much more.

Listen to the full episode above or wherever you get your podcasts.

For more from Jason Tetro, visit his website here.

Need some help with something you’ve been doing wrong? Email us at AmIDoingItWrong@HuffPost.com, and we might investigate the topic in an upcoming episode.

Share Button

Ultramarathons may damage red blood cells and accelerate aging

Running extreme distances may do more than exhaust muscles. A study published in the American Society of Hematology’s journal Blood Red Cells & Iron reports that ultra-endurance events can injure red blood cells in ways that may interfere with how they function. Researchers do not yet know how long the damage lasts or what it means for long-term health, but the findings add to growing evidence that very intense exercise may sometimes strain the body rather than strengthen it.

Earlier research found that ultramarathon runners often experience a breakdown of healthy red blood cells during races, which can potentially lead to anemia. However, scientists have not fully understood why this happens. The new study found that after prolonged races, red blood cells become less flexible. Because these cells must bend to pass through tiny blood vessels while delivering oxygen and removing waste, reduced flexibility may limit their efficiency. The team also created the most detailed molecular profile to date showing how endurance races alter red blood cells.

“Participating in events like these can cause general inflammation in the body and damage red blood cells,” said the study’s lead author, Travis Nemkov, PhD, associate professor in the department of biochemistry and molecular genetics at the University of Colorado Anschutz. “Based on these data, we don’t have guidance as to whether people should or should not participate in these types of events; what we can say is, when they do, that persistent stress is damaging the most abundant cell in the body.”

Inside the Study of Ultramarathon Runners

To examine these effects, researchers measured indicators of red blood cell health before and after athletes competed in two demanding races: the Martigny-Combes à Chamonix race (40 kilometers or about 25 miles long) and the Ultra Trail de Mont Blanc race (171 kilometers or 106 miles long). Red blood cells are responsible for carrying oxygen and transporting waste products throughout the body, and their ability to flex is critical for moving through narrow blood vessels.

The team collected blood samples from 23 runners immediately before and after their races. They analyzed thousands of proteins, lipids, metabolites, and trace elements in both plasma and red blood cells. The results consistently showed signs of injury driven by both mechanical (physical) and molecular factors. Mechanical stress likely resulted from shifts in fluid pressure as blood circulates during intense running. Molecular damage appeared linked to inflammation and oxidative stress (when the body has low levels of antioxidants, which fight off molecules that damage DNA and other components within cells).

Longer Races, Greater Cellular Stress

Evidence of accelerated aging and increased breakdown of red blood cells was visible after the 40 kilometer race and was even more pronounced among athletes who completed the 171 kilometer event. Based on these findings, researchers suggest that longer races may lead to greater loss of red blood cells and more damage to those that remain in circulation.

“At some point between marathon and ultra-marathon distances, the damage really starts to take hold,” said Dr. Nemkov. “We’ve observed this damage happening, but we don’t know how long it takes for the body to repair that damage, if that damage has a long-term impact, and whether that impact is good or bad.”

Implications for Performance and Blood Storage

With additional research, the team believes these findings could help guide personalized training, nutrition, and recovery strategies aimed at improving performance while limiting potential harm from extreme endurance exercise. The work may also have broader medical relevance. Stored blood used for transfusions begins to deteriorate after several weeks and must be discarded after six weeks under U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations. Understanding how intense physical stress affects red blood cells could provide insight into improving blood storage practices.

“Red blood cells are remarkably resilient, but they are also exquisitely sensitive to mechanical and oxidative stress,” said study co-author, Angelo D’Alessandro, PhD, professor at the University of Colorado Anschutz and member of the Hall of Fame of the Association for the Advancement of Blood and Biotherapies. “This study shows that extreme endurance exercise pushes red blood cells toward accelerated aging through mechanisms that mirror what we observe during blood storage. Understanding these shared pathways gives us a unique opportunity to learn how to better protect blood cell function both in athletes and in transfusion medicine.”

Study Limitations and Future Research

The research included a small group of participants and lacked racial diversity. Blood samples were also collected at only two time points. The investigators plan to expand future studies to include more participants, additional blood samples, and more detailed measurements after races. They also intend to further explore ways to extend the shelf life of stored blood.

Share Button

Generative AI analyzes medical data faster than human research teams

In an early real world test of artificial intelligence in health research, scientists at UC San Francisco and Wayne State University discovered that generative AI could process enormous medical datasets far faster than traditional computer science teams — and in some cases produce even stronger results. Human experts had spent months carefully analyzing the same information.

To compare performance directly, researchers assigned identical tasks to different groups. Some teams relied entirely on human expertise, while others used scientists working with AI tools. The challenge was to predict preterm birth using data from more than 1,000 pregnant women.

Even a junior research pair made up of a UCSF master’s student, Reuben Sarwal, and a high school student, Victor Tarca, successfully developed prediction models with AI support. The system generated functioning computer code in minutes — something that would normally take experienced programmers several hours or even days.

The advantage came from AI’s ability to write analytical code based on short but highly specific prompts. Not every system performed well. Only 4 of the 8 AI chatbots produced usable code. Still, those that succeeded did not require large teams of specialists to guide them.

Because of this speed, the junior researchers were able to complete their experiments, verify their findings, and submit their results to a journal within a few months.

“These AI tools could relieve one of the biggest bottlenecks in data science: building our analysis pipelines,” said Marina Sirota, PhD, a professor of Pediatrics who is the interim director of the Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute (BCHSI) at UCSF and the principal investigator of the March of Dimes Prematurity Research Center at UCSF. “The speed-up couldn’t come sooner for patients who need help now.”

Sirota is co-senior author of the study, published in Cell Reports Medicine on Feb. 17.

Why Preterm Birth Research Matters

Speeding up data analysis could improve diagnostic tools for preterm birth — the leading cause of newborn death and a major contributor to long term motor and cognitive challenges in children. In the United States, roughly 1,000 babies are born prematurely each day.

Researchers still do not fully understand what causes preterm birth. To investigate possible risk factors, Sirota’s team compiled microbiome data from about 1,200 pregnant women whose outcomes were tracked across nine separate studies.

“This kind of work is only possible with open data sharing, pooling the experiences of many women and the expertise of many researchers,” said Tomiko T. Oskotsky MD, co-director of the March of Dimes Preterm Birth Data Repository, associate professor in UCSF BCHSI, and co-author of the paper.

However, analyzing such a vast and complex dataset proved challenging. To tackle this, the researchers turned to a global crowdsourcing competition called DREAM (Dialogue on Reverse Engineering Assessment and Methods).

Sirota co-led one of three DREAM pregnancy challenges, focusing specifically on vaginal microbiome data. More than 100 teams worldwide participated, developing machine learning models designed to detect patterns linked to preterm birth. Most groups completed their work within the three month competition window. Yet it took nearly two years to consolidate the findings and publish them.

Testing AI on Pregnancy and Microbiome Data

Curious whether generative AI could shorten that timeline, Sirota’s group partnered with researchers led by Adi L. Tarca, PhD, co-senior author and professor in the Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics at Wayne State University in Detroit, MI. Tarca had led the other two DREAM challenges, which focused on improving methods for estimating pregnancy stage.

Together, the researchers instructed eight AI systems to independently generate algorithms using the same datasets from the three DREAM challenges, without direct human coding.

The AI chatbots received carefully written natural language instructions. Much like ChatGPT, the systems were guided through detailed prompts designed to steer them toward analyzing the health data in ways comparable to the original DREAM participants.

Their objectives mirrored the earlier challenges. The AI systems analyzed vaginal microbiome data to identify signs of preterm birth and examined blood or placental samples to estimate gestational age. Pregnancy dating is almost always an estimate, yet it determines the type of care women receive as pregnancies progress. When estimates are inaccurate, preparing for labor becomes more difficult.

Researchers then ran the AI generated code using the DREAM datasets. Only 4 of the 8 tools produced models that matched the performance of the human teams, although in some cases the AI models performed better. The entire generative AI effort — from inception to submission of a paper — took just six months.

Scientists emphasize that AI still requires careful oversight. These systems can produce misleading results, and human expertise remains essential. However, by rapidly sorting through massive health datasets, generative AI may allow researchers to spend less time troubleshooting code and more time interpreting results and asking meaningful scientific questions.

“Thanks to generative AI, researchers with a limited background in data science won’t always need to form wide collaborations or spend hours debugging code,” Tarca said. “They can focus on answering the right biomedical questions.”

Authors: UCSF authors are Reuben Sarwal; Claire Dubin; Sanchita Bhattacharya, MS; and Atul Butte, MD, PhD. Other authors are Victor Tarca (Huron High School, Ann Arbor, MI); Nikolas Kalavros and Gustavo Stolovitzky, PhD (New York University); Gaurav Bhatti (Wayne State University); and Roberto Romero, MD, D(Med)Sc (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)).

Funding: This work was funded by the March of Dimes Prematurity Research Center at UCSF, and by ImmPort. The data used in this study was generated in part with support from the Pregnancy Research Branch of the NICHD.

Share Button

Puberty blockers trial paused over concerns from medicines watchdog

The medicines regulator is suggesting the minimum age limit for trial should be raised to 14.

Share Button

Multi-cancer blood test missed key goal in NHS trial

The company behind the test said there were positive signs that some of the most aggressive cancers could be prevented.

Share Button

4 Years On Since Putin’s Invasion, Is There Any Hope A Trump Deal Could Secure Peace In Ukraine?

Ukraine will mark the fourth anniversary of Vladimir Putin’s barbaric invasion on Tuesday, February 24.

The date will serve as a cruel reminder of just how long this war has been raging, especially as the third round of trilateral talks between Russia, Ukraine and the US failed to make any significant progress last week.

Moscow’s refusals to give up its maximalist goals weigh down Donald Trump’s push for a speedy peace deal – though the US president continues to falsely blame Kyiv for the stagnant talks.

Earlier this week, he told reporters that it was going to be “very easy” to reach a deal.

But he warned: “Ukraine better come to the table, fast. That’s all I’m telling you. We are in a position, we want them to come.”

Desperate to secure an agreement and consolidate his supposed reputation as a “deal-maker”, Trump has time and time again promised a truce is on the horizon – all while Russian strikes continue to target Ukraine.

But, as Ukraine enters its fifth year of war, could the president be right, and an end is in sight?

HuffPost UK asked experts just how realistic Trump’s claims are – and if there are any alternatives to a formal peace agreement.

Could 2026 Be The Year The Ukraine War Finally Turns Around?

British officials are confident that Ukraine can hold its ground on the battlefield in the east, even after a challenging winter where Russia repeatedly targeted Ukraine’s energy infrastructure.

That enables Kyiv to hold a firmer line in negotiations – like refusing to give into Putin and Trump’s demands that Ukraine gives up even more land.

But there are fears – particularly in Ukraine – that the talks themselves are just theatre to entertain Trump, with Kyiv delegates put under pressure to join.

Similarly, experts told HuffPost UK that it seems unlikely these negotiations will result in anything.

Professor Konstantin Sonin, from the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy said he remains sceptical that Trump could secure a peace deal because “the basic, big things remain unchanged”.

Ukrainian soldiers of the 48th separate artillery brigade fire at Russian positions on the frontline in Kharkiv region, Ukraine, Wednesday, Feb. 18, 2026.
Ukrainian soldiers of the 48th separate artillery brigade fire at Russian positions on the frontline in Kharkiv region, Ukraine, Wednesday, Feb. 18, 2026.

via Associated Press

He told HuffPost UK that Putin does not care about the cost of the war in terms of soldiers’ lives and material expenses, even though Russia is estimated to have suffered 1.2 million casualties since the conflict began.

While British officials have signalled that, beneath the surface, Russia’s economy is slowing down – with a fall in oil prices and a hike in VAT – that impact does not seem to have yet trickled through to the battlefield.

It’s suspected that Putin has not been informed about the reality of the public finances, or the eroding public support for the war.

But, at the same time, the Ukrainian army and state is nowhere near the state of collapse. In fact, its defence sector has been boosted over the last four years.

“A couple of more years of grinding warfare, in which the Russian army exchanges dozens of thousands of men for villages and townships in Eastern Ukraine, are totally possible,” Sonin, a Russian citizen and Kremlin critic, said.

“And then a new US president, a Republican or a Democrat, will be able to push Putin towards peace.”

Dr Simon Bennett, from the University of Leicester’s civil safety and security unit, also suggested it seemed pretty unlikely Trump’s efforts would result in a peace deal.

He said: “The upshot of this in 2026 is likely to be that Russia’s gains will come at an even greater cost, and, occasionally, will be partially reversed, albeit on a small scale in terms of square miles retaken by Ukraine.”

Bennett predicted Putin’s ongoing bid to control the whole of Ukraine’s eastern region, the Donbas, will likely mean the territory continues to be “the same bloody quagmire in 2026 as it was in 2025.”

“A couple of more years of grinding warfare… are totally possible”

– Professor Konstantin Sonin, the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy

Could Anything Force Trump To Crack Down On Putin?

Kurt Volker, who stepped down as Trump’s special envoy to Ukraine in 2019, claimed this week that the president has done a lot towards ending the war.

For instance, he has encouraged Ukraine to accept the idea of a ceasefire, and forced European allies to increase defence spending.

But speaking to the Centre for European Policy Analysis (CEPA) think tank, Volker said: “He still needs to get an end to the war. We need to be demanding a ceasefire and putting pressure on Russia to do that as soon as possible.”

The president’s annual State of the Union address is set to be on February 24 this year, the fourth anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion.

But experts do not expect him to use the opportunity to finally recognise the extent of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine.

As Bennett said, Trump is too “inconsistent” – and his approach to policy-making is a “crisis or war waiting to happen”.

The specialist also pointed out that “Putin has no intention of negotiating a peace deal” and claimed he is playing “demonstrably gullible” Trump.

Meanwhile, when asked if the US president could crack down on Russia in a bid to boost his ratings before the midterm elections in November, Sonin said: “There will be more pressure on Trump from the Congress Republicans, because both the US population and the elite have been consistently supportive of Ukraine through the years of war.

“So, I’d expect Trump to do small things against Putin.”

President Donald Trump, right, and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy shake hands at the start of a joint news conference following a meeting at Trump's Mar-a-Lago club, Dec. 28, 2025, in Palm Beach, Fla.
President Donald Trump, right, and Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy shake hands at the start of a joint news conference following a meeting at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club, Dec. 28, 2025, in Palm Beach, Fla.

via Associated Press

Could It Be Possible To Agree To A Ceasefire, but Not A Peace Deal?

Kurt Volkner told CEPA that it could be possible to strike up a deal comparable to the one which stopped the war between North and South Korea.

That non-aggression pact has – for the most part – held for more than 70 years, even though neither side technically agreed to a sustainable peace.

Volkner said: “Someday, I do believe there will be a ceasefire. I don’t believe there will ever be a peace agreement.

“I don’t believe Vladimir Putin will ever accept that there is an independent and sovereign Ukraine.

“Again, of the West, of governments, of investors, businesses, needs to be one that assumes that we will have a strong, growing, prosperous democratic European Ukraine that is safe and worthy of investment and business growth, very much like South Korea, without a final peace agreement with Russia, that’s just going to be where we are.”

But Sonin disagreed with this idea.

He said that while the North-South Korea deal was “one of the most durable, effective peace agreements despite never being finally ‘settled’”, it’s clear from previous attempts that written agreements between Russia and Ukraine do not work.

He also pointed out that such an agreement relies on the US commitment to help South Korea if North Korea invades, and China’s commitment to help North Korea if South Korea invades.

Sonin said: “A ‘peace agreement without a peace agreement’ between Russia and Ukraine is totally possible, but it will require Polish, German, Swedish, Baltic, etc, troops on the ground in Ukraine and a firm US commitment to get involved immediately if a new conflict starts.”

Bennett also dismissed Volker’s argument, as Putin still wants to restore Ukraine into a satellite state for Moscow.

“Few western leaders mention the fact that Putin’s war aims have not changed, first, because it does not fit with the Trump-the-Peacemaker-Extraordinaire narrative and secondly, because, when it comes to dealing with Trump, most western leaders are spineless,” Bennett said.

President Donald Trump, right, shakes the hand of Russia's President Vladimir Putin during a joint press conference at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, Friday, Aug. 15, 2025.
President Donald Trump, right, shakes the hand of Russia’s President Vladimir Putin during a joint press conference at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, Friday, Aug. 15, 2025.

via Associated Press

Can Anything Be Done In The Pursuit Of Peace?

It’s widely believed that, in the absence of a stronger response from Trump, only a firmer intervention from Europe can actually stop the war.

But Ukraine allies across the continent have so far refused to commit to sending troops unless they operate in a peace-keeping capacity, as they want to avoid direct conflict with Russia.

Sonin told HuffPost UK: “I think that European countries will have to get involved into the military defense of Ukraine – sending ground troops, drone operators, etc. Of course it is a heavy lift politically.

“However, for the elites in Poland or Germany or Czech Republic or Romania or Baltic countries a scenario of Russia-controlled Ukraine (with Ukrainian army under maybe influence of the Russian masters) should be so scary that even a political heavy lift might become reality.”

He warned that without such an intervention, “the only hope is an internal collapse of Putin’s regime”.

Similarly, Bennett said Europe must resolve the issue by sending arms to Ukraine urgently, while the Russian army is weak.

“The cost in blood and treasure will be great,” Bennett said. “But nowhere near as great as allowing Russia to regenerate its armed forces for a final push on western Europe in five to 10 years’ time.”

Bennett said he saw this year’s Munich Conference as a “watershed moment”, as US secretary of state Marco Rubio reiterated that the White House primarily sees the Ukraine conflict as a problem for Europe not for the US.

Similarly, Volker said: “Europe can do a lot and can do a lot more than it is currently doing. And as I said, I picked up in Munich a realisation among a lot of European leaders that they’re not doing enough, that they need to step in and fill a gap that the US is leaving. So there are there’s a lot they can do.”

“The US sees itself as more of an arbiter than a prime mover in respect of European security,” Bennett said, adding: “I shall put it bluntly: the only way to end this war is through war. Europe must take Russia down.”

With nothing within Russia threatening to slow Putin’s ongoing aggression, and Trump’s efforts still – for now – amounting to mainly showmanship, ending the war in 2026 seems like a pipe dream, unless Europe gets directly involved.

As Bennett said: “Our fate is in our hands, and no-one else’s.”

Share Button

Expert Shares The Hidden Gender Gap In Bereavement

The loss of a loved one is a heavy weight and one that all of us will experience throughout our lives. The emotional toll alone can make day to day life incredibly difficult to cope with.

This is before we even consider the practical and financial elements of loss which, according to the loss experts at Empathy, fall disproportionately on women in the UK.

HuffPost UK spoke exclusively with Clare Dodd, UK General Manager at Empathy who shared: “When we talk about bereavement, the first thing people think of is the emotional devastation – how awful it must be to not have that person in your life anymore.

“But what often gets overlooked, and can be equally painful to deal with, is the practical avalanche that follows a death. And in the UK, that burden disproportionately falls on women.”

This is partially because Census data reveals women are significantly more likely to be widowed than men, and around three quarters of bereavement benefit claimants are female according to DWP data.

However, the bereavement gender gap goes a little deeper

Dodd adds: “Beyond the statistics, we see a clear pattern amongst the people we work with: women are often the ones left navigating the administrative tasks of loss, while handling their own grief.

“And the to-do list can be lengthy – planning a funeral, contacting pension providers, closing bank accounts, organising the funeral, dealing with probate, all while holding the family together emotionally.”

Of course, this leads to a lot of stress on women. According to Empathy’s research, women are almost 40% more likely than men to suffer physical symptoms of stress, and 60% more likely to experience psychological symptoms post-loss.

Dodd adds: “We’re also seeing the ramifications of traditional gender stereotypes around finances play out in grief. Empathy’s research found that women are more likely to report being uninvolved in long-term household financial planning, such as managing advisers, pensions and insurance.”

This aligns with UK data showing 70% of people who manage household finances alone are men. Additionally, research from Canada Life also found nearly half of couples don’t know where their partner’s will is kept, highlighting how financial visibility gaps are widespread.

“So when a partner dies, some women are not just grieving; they’re also suddenly trying to understand pensions, investments or debts they may never have been fully included in, find the details for a financial adviser they’ve never met or figure out which insurer to contact,” says Dodd.

“That cognitive load is huge. Grief already affects memory, concentration and decision-making. Layer complex bureaucracy on top of that and it can become very difficult to cope.”

The bureaucracy of death admin can take a toll, too

We wrote last year about how death admin becomes a secondary trauma for grieving people, and Dodd agrees, saying: ” Every bank, insurer and utility provider has its own process. People have to repeat the same painful information again and again, which makes it incredibly difficult to begin the healing journey.

“The way bereavement works from a policy perspective doesn’t make this any easier, which is a real shame. Outside of child bereavement, there is no guaranteed statutory paid leave for losing a spouse or partner in the UK.

“Many people get just a couple of compassionate days off work, and then they’re expected to return while still navigating funeral arrangements and legal processes, as well as the emotional implications of a loss that they may not have fully processed yet. A few days off simply doesn’t reflect the magnitude of what bereavement involves.”

How we can better support women through the admin side of loss

I asked Dodd what we could do to support women when they’re dealing with this avalanche of admin. She said: “The people we work with often tell us they feel isolated but don’t know why, since a lot of family and friends might be checking in, bringing food or saying things like ‘let me know if you need anything.’

“For most people though, it feels too daunting to make a specific ask – and sometimes they don’t even know what to ask for. So the best support you can give to anyone navigating the admin of loss, regardless of gender, is to offer practical, bite-size support.

“Little things like researching the process for cancelling their loved one’s driver’s licence or sourcing the number for the right department at the bank can be hugely helpful”

She adds that while your loved one may be capable of managing all of this, they may not have the bandwidth to, saying: “Remember this is not about capability. It’s about capacity. Someone might be perfectly competent or independent, but grief shrinks your bandwidth. Reducing decision fatigue is a real form of care.”

How we can prepare ourselves for loss

It’s not a comfortable topic to address but Dodd says: “The single most protective thing couples can do is talk openly about money and logistics before anything happens. Both partners should know where key documents are kept, understand what accounts exist, and feel confident accessing them. Passwords and important contacts should be documented somewhere secure but accessible.

It’s never nice to think about death, but keeping your will up to date is so crucial. Remember big life changes like getting married, divorced or having a child can invalidate previous wills or signal changes to intestacy if someone dies without a will.

“If there are big changes to your assets, for example purchasing a new or additional property, it’s also a great time to review both your will and your insurance cover.”

Look after each other.

Help and support:

  • Mind, open Monday to Friday, 9am-6pm on 0300 123 3393.
  • Samaritans offers a listening service which is open 24 hours a day, on 116 123 (UK and ROI – this number is FREE to call and will not appear on your phone bill).
  • CALM (the Campaign Against Living Miserably) offer a helpline open 5pm-midnight, 365 days a year, on 0800 58 58 58, and a webchat service.
  • The Mix is a free support service for people under 25. Call 0808 808 4994 or email help@themix.org.uk
  • Rethink Mental Illness offers practical help through its advice line which can be reached on 0808 801 0525 (Monday to Friday 10am-4pm). More info can be found on rethink.org.
Share Button