Tories Row Back After Launching Brutal Attack On Reform Defector Suella Braverman’s ‘Mental Health’

The Conservatives have amended their initial reaction to Reform UK MP Suella Braverman’s defection after lashing out at her “mental health”.

The former Tory home secretary announced she was joining Nigel Farage’s new party on Monday – and the Conservative team quickly attacked her.

In their initial statement, a Tory spokesperson said: “It was always a matter of when, not if, Suella would defect.

“The Conservatives did all we could to look after Suella’s mental health, but she was clearly very unhappy.”

The initial message triggered significant backlash on social media, with Tory peer Stewart Jackson calling it a “nasty and unpleasant statement” on X.

He warned: “That’s another few thousand votes they’ve lost.”

Two hours later, the Tories sent out another “final” statement – and removed that second sentence, claiming the first draft was “sent out in error”.

A Reform source said: “It’s a gross affront to millions of people in this country’s; it’s also not true.

“Whether you like Suella or not, she is a Cambridge-educated barrister who has served in a series of extraordinarily senior positions in this country. It goes without saying that she has never been diagnosed with a mental health condition.

″[This] is a testament to the extent to which the Tory party is in real panic mode and is prepared to say anything.”

Braverman later told reporters at a subsequent press conference that those attacks from the Tories “say more about them than they do about me”.

She added: “It is a bit pathetic. I am afraid it’s more sorry signs of a bitter and desperate party that is in free fall.”

The keen eurosceptic announced earlier on Monday that she felt she had “come home” by joining Farage’s Reform.

Braverman was known for trying to push the Conservatives further right when her party was in government.

She held multiple ministerial positions under the last four Tory prime ministers, including attorney-general and home secretary.

As of this afternoon, the Conservatives’ final statement read:

“It was always a matter of when, not if, Suella would defect.

“She says she feels that she has ‘come home’, which will come as a surprise to the people who chose not to elect a Reform MP in her constituency in 2024.

“There are some people who are MPs because they care about their communities and want to deliver a better country.

“There are others who do it for their personal ambition.

“Suella stood for leader of the Conservatives in 2022 and came sixth, behind Kemi and Tom Tugendhat.

“In 2024 she could not even muster enough supporters to get on the ballot. She has now decided to try her luck with Nigel Farage, who said last year he didn’t want her in Reform.

“They really are doing our ‘Spring cleaning’!

“As always happens with Reform, they unveil defections just when the Labour government is tearing itself to pieces – Rayner, Mandelson, now Burnham.

“Reform are too busy opposing the Conservatives to hold the Labour government to account.

“The Conservative Party is now the only party that believes in smaller government, less welfare and Britain living within its means, and has the team and the experience to get Britain working again.”

Share Button

Kanye West Issues Public Apology ‘To Those I’ve Hurt’ Over Past Antisemitic Comments

“25 years ago, I was in a car accident that broke my jaw and caused injury to the right frontal lobe of my brain. At the time, the focus was on the visible damage – the fracture, the swelling, and the immediate physical trauma. The deeper injury, the one inside my skull, went unnoticed.

“Comprehensive scans were not done, neurological exams were limited, and the possibility of a frontal-lobe injury was never raised. It wasn’t properly diagnosed until 2023. That medical oversight caused serious damage to my mental health and led to my bipolar type-1 diagnosis.

“Bipolar disorder comes with its own defence system. Denial. When you’re manic, you don’t think you’re sick. You think everyone else is overreacting. You feel like you’re seeing the world more clearly than ever, when in reality you’re losing your grip entirely.

“Once people label you as ‘crazy’, you feel as if you cannot contribute anything meaningful to the world. It’s easy for people to joke and laugh it off when in fact this is a very serious debilitating disease you can die from. According to the World Health Organisation and Cambridge University, people with bipolar disorder have a life expectancy that is shortened by 10 to 15 years on average, and a two-to-three-times higher all-cause mortality rate than the general population. This is on par with severe heart disease, type-1 diabetes, HIV, and cancer – all lethal and fatal if left untreated.

“The scariest thing about this disorder is how persuasive it is when it tells you: You don’t need help. It makes you blind, but convinced you have insight. You feel powerful, certain, and unstoppable.

“I lost touch with reality. Things got worse the longer I ignored the problem. I said and did things I deeply regret. Some of the people I love the most, I treated the worst. You endured fear, confusion, humiliation, and the exhaustion of trying to love someone who was, at times, unrecognisable. Looking back, I became detached from my true self.

“In that fractured state, I gravitated toward the most destructive symbol I could find, the swastika, and even sold t-shirts bearing it. One of the difficult aspects of having bipolar type-1 are the disconnected moments – many of which I still cannot recall – that lead to poor judgment and reckless behaviour that [often] feels like an out-of-body experience. I regret and am deeply mortified by my actions in that state, and am committed to accountability, treatment, and meaningful change. It does not excuse what I did, though. I am not a Nazi or an antisemite. I love Jewish people.

“To the Black community – which held me down through all of the highs and lows and the darkest of times. The Black community is, unquestionably, the foundation of who I am. I am so sorry to have let you down. I love us.

“In early 2025, I fell into a four-month long manic episode of psychotic, paranoid and impulsive behaviour that destroyed my life. As the situation became increasingly unsustainable, there were times I didn’t want to be here anymore. Having bipolar disorder is not a state of constant mental illness. When you go into the manic episode, you are ill at that point.

“When you are not in an episode, you are completely ‘normal’. And that’s when the wreckage from the illness hits the hardest. Hitting rock bottom a few months ago, my wife encouraged me to finally get help.

“I have found comfort in Reddit forums of all places. Different people speak of being in manic or depressive episodes of a similar nature. I read their stories and realised that I was not alone. It’s not just me who ruins their entire life once a year despite taking meds every day and being told by the so-called best doctors in the world that I am not bipolar, but merely experiencing ‘symptoms of autism’.

“My words as a leader in my community have real global impact and influence. In my mania, I lost complete sight of that. As I find my new baseline and new centre through an effective regime of medication, therapy, exercise and clean living, I have newfound, much-needed clarity. I am pouring my energy into positive, meaningful art: music, clothing, design, and other new ideas to help the world.

“I’m not asking for sympathy, or a free pass, though I aspire to earn your forgiveness. I write today simply to ask for your patience and understanding as I find my way home.”

Share Button

UK loses measles elimination status

Decision made after outbreaks in 2024, when there were nearly 3,000 cases in England and Wales.

Share Button

A dying star’s final breath glows in a new Webb image of the Helix Nebula

First observed in the early 1800s, the Helix Nebula has become one of the most recognizable planetary nebulas in the sky thanks to its bold, ring-like appearance. As one of the closest planetary nebulas to Earth, it offers astronomers a rare opportunity to closely examine the final stages of a star’s life. For decades, scientists have studied it using both ground-based and space-based telescopes.

Now, the James Webb Space Telescope has taken those observations further by delivering the most detailed infrared view ever captured of this familiar object.

A Preview of the Sun’s Distant Fate

Webb’s powerful instruments allow scientists to zoom deep into the Helix Nebula, offering a glimpse of what could eventually happen to our own Sun and planetary system. The telescope’s sharp infrared vision clearly reveals the structure of gas flowing away from a dying star. This material, once part of the star itself, is being returned to space, where it can later contribute to the formation of new stars and planets.

Images from Webb’s NIRCam (Near-Infrared Camera) reveal dense pillars of gas that resemble comets with long trailing tails. These features outline the inner edge of an expanding shell of material. They form as fast-moving, extremely hot winds from the dying star slam into cooler layers of dust and gas that were released earlier in the star’s life. The collisions carve and sculpt the nebula, creating its intricate and textured appearance.

How Webb’s View Compares to Earlier Observations

Since its discovery nearly two centuries ago, the Helix Nebula has been observed by many telescopes. Webb’s near-infrared images bring small knots of gas and dust into much sharper focus than the soft, glowing view seen in images from the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope. The new data also highlights a clear transition from the hottest gas near the center to much cooler material farther out, as the nebula continues to expand away from its central star.

At the center of the Helix Nebula is a white dwarf, the exposed core left behind after the star shed its outer layers. Although it sits just outside the frame of Webb’s image, its influence is unmistakable. Intense radiation from the white dwarf energizes the surrounding gas, producing a range of environments. Closest to the core is hot, ionized gas, followed by cooler regions rich in molecular hydrogen. Farther out, sheltered pockets within dust clouds allow more complex molecules to begin forming. These regions contain the basic materials that can eventually help build new planets in other star systems.

What the Colors in Webb’s Image Reveal

In Webb’s image, color is used to represent differences in temperature and chemical makeup. Blue tones indicate the hottest gas, energized by strong ultraviolet radiation. Yellow areas show cooler regions where hydrogen atoms bond together to form molecules. Along the outer edges, red hues trace the coldest material, where gas thins and dust begins to take shape. Together, these colors illustrate how a star’s final outflow becomes the raw material for future worlds, adding to Webb’s growing contributions to our understanding of how planets form.

The Helix Nebula lies about 650 light-years from Earth in the constellation Aquarius. Its relative closeness and striking structure have made it a favorite target for both amateur skywatchers and professional astronomers.

More Information About the James Webb Space Telescope

Webb is the largest and most powerful space telescope ever launched. As part of an international collaboration, ESA provided the launch service using the Ariane 5 rocket. ESA also oversaw the development and testing of Ariane 5 modifications for the mission and arranged the launch through Arianespace. In addition, ESA contributed the NIRSpec instrument and 50% of the mid-infrared instrument MIRI, which was designed and built by a consortium of nationally funded European Institutes (The MIRI European Consortium) working in partnership with JPL and the University of Arizona.

Webb is a joint project involving NASA, ESA, and the Canadian Space Agency (CSA).

Share Button

Distant entangled atoms acting as one sensor deliver stunning precision

Researchers at the University of Basel and the Laboratoire Kastler Brossel have shown that quantum entanglement can be used to measure several physical quantities at the same time with greater accuracy than traditional methods allow.

Entanglement is often described as one of the most mysterious effects in quantum physics. When two quantum objects are entangled, measurements performed on them can remain strongly linked even when the objects are far apart. These unexpected statistical connections have no explanation in classical physics. The effect can appear as though measuring one object somehow influences the other at a distance. This phenomenon, known as the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, was confirmed experimentally and recognized with the 2022 Nobel Prize in physics.

Using Distant Entanglement for Precision Measurements

Building on this foundation, a team led by Prof. Dr. Philipp Treutlein at the University of Basel and Prof. Dr. Alice Sinatra at the Laboratoire Kastler Brossel (LKB) in Paris demonstrated that entanglement between quantum objects separated in space can serve a practical purpose. Their work shows that spatially separated but entangled systems can be used to measure multiple physical parameters at once with improved precision. The results of the study were recently published in the journal Science.

“Quantum metrology, which exploits quantum effects to improve measurements of physical quantities, is by now an established field of research,” says Treutlein. Around fifteen years ago, he and his collaborators were among the first to entangle the spins of extremely cold atoms. These spins, which can be imagined as tiny compass needles, could then be measured more precisely than if each atom behaved independently without entanglement.

“However, those atoms were all in the same location,” Treutlein explains: “We have now extended this concept by distributing the atoms into up to three spatially separated clouds. As a result, the effects of entanglement act at a distance, just as in the EPR paradox.”

Mapping Fields With Entangled Atomic Clouds

This approach is especially useful for studying quantities that vary across space. For example, researchers interested in measuring how an electromagnetic field changes from place to place can use entangled atomic spins that are physically separated. As with measurements made at a single location, entanglement reduces uncertainty that arises from quantum effects. It can also cancel out disturbances that affect all of the atoms in the same way.

“So far, no one has performed such a quantum measurement with spatially separated entangled atomic clouds, and the theoretical framework for such measurements was also still unclear,” says Yifan Li, who worked on the experiment as a postdoc in Treutlein’s group. Together with colleagues at the LKB, the team studied how to minimize uncertainty when using entangled clouds to measure the spatial structure of an electromagnetic field.

To do this, the researchers first entangled the atomic spins within a single cloud. They then divided that cloud into three parts that remained entangled with one another. With only a small number of measurements, they were able to determine the field distribution with clearly higher precision than would be possible without entanglement across space.

Applications in Atomic Clocks and Gravimeters

“Our measurement protocols can be directly applied to existing precision instruments such as optical lattice clocks,” says Lex Joosten, PhD student in the Basel group. In these clocks, atoms are held in place by laser beams arranged in a lattice and serve as extremely precise “clockworks.” The new methods could reduce specific errors caused by how atoms are distributed within the lattice, leading to more accurate timekeeping.

The same strategy could also improve atom interferometers, which are used to measure the Earth’s gravitational acceleration. In certain applications, known as gravimeters, scientists focus on how gravity changes across space. Using entangled atoms makes it possible to measure these variations with greater precision than before.

Share Button

Your fireplace may be doing more harm than you think

Adding a log to a glowing fireplace on a cold winter night often feels comforting and harmless. However, new research from Northwestern University shows that burning wood inside homes plays a much larger role in winter air pollution across the United States than many people realize.

The study found that even though only 2% of U.S. households use wood as their main source of heat, residential wood burning is responsible for more than one fifth of Americans’ winter exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter (PM2.5).

These microscopic particles are small enough to travel deep into the lungs and enter the bloodstream. Long term exposure has been linked to serious health problems, including heart disease, lung disease, and premature death. Based on their analysis, the researchers estimate that pollution from residential wood burning is associated with about 8,600 premature deaths each year.

Urban communities face the greatest risks

One of the study’s most unexpected findings is where the greatest harm occurs. People living in cities are affected more than those in rural areas. The health impacts also fall disproportionately on people of color, who tend to burn less wood but experience higher exposure levels and greater health risks from wood smoke. The researchers point to higher baseline mortality rates and the lasting effects of past discriminatory policies as key factors behind this disparity.

The findings suggest that reducing wood burning inside homes could significantly lower outdoor air pollution, leading to major public health benefits and potentially saving thousands of lives.

The study was published on Jan. 23 in the journal Science Advances.

“Long-term exposure to fine particulate matter is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases,” said Northwestern’s Kyan Shlipak, who led the study. “Studies have shown consistently that this exposure leads to a higher risk of death. Our study suggests that one way to substantially reduce this pollution is to reduce residential wood burning. Using alternative appliances to heat homes instead of burning wood would have a big impact on fine particulate matter in the air.”

Why home wood burning is often overlooked

Wildfire smoke often dominates public attention, but pollution from everyday home heating rarely receives the same scrutiny.

“We frequently hear about the negative health impacts of wildfire smoke, but do not often consider the consequences of burning wood for heat in our homes,” said Northwestern’s Daniel Horton, the study’s senior author. “Since only a small number of homes rely on wood burning for heat, facilitating a home-heating appliance transition to cleaner burning or non-burning heat sources could lead to outsized improvements in air quality.”

Horton is an associate professor of Earth, environmental and planetary sciences at Northwestern’s Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences, where he directs the Climate Change Research Group (CCRG). Shlipak is an undergraduate in mechanical engineering at Northwestern’s McCormick School of Engineering and a member of the CCRG.

Mapping pollution neighborhood by neighborhood

For decades, air quality research and regulation have focused mainly on emissions from vehicles, power plants, agriculture, industry, and wildfires. In this study, the researchers turned their attention to a less studied source of pollution: wood burning in homes, including furnaces, boilers, fireplaces, and stoves.

The team began by collecting residential wood burning data from the National Emissions Inventory (NEI), a detailed database maintained by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The NEI estimates emissions using information from household surveys, housing characteristics, climate conditions, and appliance types.

The researchers then applied a high resolution atmospheric model to simulate how pollution travels through the air. This model incorporates weather patterns, wind, temperature, terrain, and atmospheric chemistry to estimate changes in air quality over time.

“Wood burning emissions enter the atmosphere, where they are affected by meteorology,” Horton said. “Some emissions are considered primary pollutants, such as black carbon, and some interact with the atmosphere and other constituents, and can form additional, secondary species of particulate matter pollution.”

To identify detailed pollution patterns, the team divided the continental United States into a grid made up of 4 kilometer by 4 kilometer squares. For each grid square, they calculated how much pollution was produced each hour, how it moved through the air, and where it accumulated or dispersed. This approach allowed the researchers to pinpoint pollution hotspots that would not appear in broader city or county averages.

The model was run twice, once including residential wood burning emissions and once without them. By comparing the two results, the researchers determined that residential wood burning accounts for about 22% of wintertime PM2.5 pollution. This makes it one of the largest single sources of fine particle pollution during the coldest months of the year.

Vulnerable populations bear the burden

The analysis showed that wood smoke pollution is especially harmful in urban and suburban areas, where population density, emissions patterns, and atmospheric movement combine to increase exposure. In many cases, smoke produced in suburban areas drifts into nearby city centers, where fewer homes burn wood but many more people live.

Cities that are not typically associated with wood burning can also be affected during cold snaps, recreational burning periods, and when smoke travels long distances through the atmosphere.

“Our results suggest that the impacts of residential wood burning are primarily an urban and suburban phenomenon,” Shlipak said. “This finding underscores the public health relevance of this pollution. We estimate that long-term exposure to emissions from wintertime wood burning is associated with approximately 8,600 deaths per year, and this estimate does not account for particulate matter exposures in other seasons.”

To understand who faces the greatest risks, the researchers combined their pollution estimates with U.S. census data and mortality statistics at the census tract level. They found that people of color experience higher exposure and greater health harms despite contributing less to wood burning emissions. In the Chicago metropolitan area, for example, Black communities face more than 30% higher adverse health effects from residential wood burning compared with the citywide average.

“While a lot of emissions from residential wood burning come from the suburbs, pollutants emitted into the air don’t typically stay put,” Horton said. “When this pollution is transported over densely populated cities, more people are exposed. Because people of color tend to be more susceptible to environmental stressors due to the long tail of past discriminatory policies, we estimate larger negative health outcomes for people of color.”

“People of color face both higher baseline mortality rates and higher rates of exposure to pollution from wood burning,” Shlipak said. “However, people of color are correlated with lower emissions rates, indicating that a large fraction of this pollution is transported to these communities, rather than emitted by them.”

The researchers note that the study focuses only on outdoor exposure to wood burning pollution. Health effects linked to indoor exposure to particulate matter were not included, even though they also pose serious public health risks.

The study, “Ambient air quality and health impacts of PM2.5 from U.S. residential wood combustion,” was supported by the National Science Foundation (award number CAS-Climate-2239834).

Share Button

‘Heading football likely to have contributed to McQueen’s brain disease’

An inquest concludes that “it is likely that repetitive head impacts, sustained by heading the ball while playing football, contributed to the CTE” which was a factor in the former Scotland footballer’s death.

Share Button

‘I spent £2,000 on one event’: Why Gen Z is obsessed with Hyrox

How young millennials and Generation Z – people in their twenties to early forties – have become obsessed with this fitness craze.

Share Button

Thousands of children facing ‘catastrophic’ waits for NHS community care

A quarter of the 300,000 children waiting for community NHS care have spent more than a year waiting.

Share Button

There Are Clear Body Language Signs Someone Thinks You Are Annoying

We’ve all been there: mid-story, mid-vent, mid-enthusiastic ramble, and suddenly the other person’s energy shifts. Their smile fades. Their eyes wander down to their phone. Their whole body seems to quietly scream: “Please stop.”

Most of us don’t realise when we’re annoying someone. We just think we’re being ourselves.

We might think we’re offering the type of advice our spouse really needs to hear right now. We think sharing our story from last night’s gym session is just as funny to our friend as it was to us. Or we might (wrongly) assume that filling the silence with the latest story about our cat is a welcomed icebreaker for our co-workers in the break room.

But what might feel normal or relieving to us can feel like irritation to another.

The thing about annoyance is that it’s rarely announced out loud. People – whether on the playground or in the office – are often too polite to say, “Hey, you’re annoying me right now.” Instead, it shows up through subtle changes in posture, facial expressions, tone and attention.

While we might not always be liked by everyone, which is totally normal, if we’re not quick to notice the signs that we’re annoying someone, we might continue not reading the room and further alienate the people around us.

According to the licensed psychologists HuffPost spoke with, these quiet cues are often more honest than words. Here are the body language signs to watch for when you’re annoying someone.

Their face gives them away

Not everyone has a poker face – no matter how hard they might try.

“Annoyance may first appear in a person’s face,” says Dr. Michele Leno, a licensed psychologist and host of Mind Matters with Dr. Michele.

Subtle eye-rolling, a sudden blank expression or looking away while you’re talking – these are all red flags that you’re annoying someone.

“When someone is irritated, their nervous system activates a mild fight-or-flight response,” Leno explained. “Micro-expressions – like an eye roll – are quick, unconscious ways the body tries to release tension.”

In other words: even if they’re still nodding politely, their face may already be telling you how they really feel.

They look at their phone

This one is pretty much universal. “When someone looks at their phone, it often shows boredom or annoyance,” Samantha Whiten, a clinical psychologist, told HuffPost. “They’re using a socially sanctioned way to get out of talking to you and hoping you take the hint.”

In today’s always connected culture, phones provide an easy escape. But when someone is genuinely interested in you, they stay engaged, and if they do get interrupted, they usually apologise and try to come back to the conversation.

If you continuously encounter someone gazing down at their phone when you open your mouth, chances are, you annoy them.

If you continuously encounter someone gazing down at their phone when you open your mouth, chances are, you annoy them.

Dejan Marjanovic via Getty Images

If you continuously encounter someone gazing down at their phone when you open your mouth, chances are, you annoy them.

They start distancing themselves

If someone is annoyed with you, you may feel them pulling away – emotionally, physically or both.

“Did they walk away when you entered the room? Did they indirectly refuse to engage in conversation with you? If so, you may annoy them,” Leno said.

They may avoid you by declining invitations that include you. Texts might become sporadic or ultimately leave you on read.

It’s hard not to take this behaviour personally, but as Leno notes, people typically act like this when they feel “overwhelmed, and in an effort to protect their personal space, they keep their distance.

A person’s emotional bandwidth may not accommodate anxiety-producing situations, so they remove themselves as needed.”

They sigh, fidget or take deep breaths

Those exaggerated inhales you heard from your co-worker when you started talking about your latest Netflix obsession? They’re not random.

“We need to protect our well-being at all times,” Leno said. So behaviours like deep breaths, fidgeting or shifting in place, she said, are all physical attempts to calm the nervous system and reset when tension is building, aka when you’re annoying someone.

If someone suddenly starts sighing or picking at their fingernails while you’re talking, it may be their body signalling overload.

Their arms cross over their chest

Seeing someone with crossed arms doesn’t necessarily mean you have to hike up the thermostat at work – it’s often about protection.

“This is a defensive posture,” Whiten said. “The person is trying to put up a virtual shield.” If crossed arms are paired with looking away, a lack of smiling or silence, it’s a strong sign the person feels intruded on or overwhelmed.

That’s your cue to give them space.

Their tone changes

Listen not just to what a person says to you but how they say it.

“If a person goes from calm and engaged to flat or high-pitched, they may be attempting to reduce tension,” Leno said. Short answers like “yes” or “no” when more detail would normally come are another giveaway. This goes for text messages too.

Tone shifts often happen when someone wants out of a conversation but doesn’t feel comfortable saying it.

Tone shifts often happen when someone wants out of a conversation but doesn’t feel comfortable saying it.

Brasileira via Getty Images

Tone shifts often happen when someone wants out of a conversation but doesn’t feel comfortable saying it.

They yawn – openly

Most adults can usually control their yawns. So when someone yawns right in front of you?

“Some part of them is hoping you’ll notice and disengage,” Whiten said. ”If someone combines this with looking away or an unsmiling or quiet demeanour, it is best to conclude that you may be irritating or overwhelming them, and move to talk to another person.”

What to do if you realise you’ve annoyed someone

First: pause. “Listen without offering advice or judgment,” Leno said. “Ask what is needed instead of assuming.” Simply slowing down and being curious can de-escalate tension quickly.

The simplest tool to become more self-aware of your behaviour? Watch how people respond to you.

“The best way to understand how your behaviour affects others is to notice their reactions to your presence,” Leno said.

And if you suspect something is off, a gentle, honest conversation can help clear the air.

At the same time, it’s OK to accept that not everyone will love your communication style. “It’s important to be authentic,” Leno said. “If someone is unreasonably irritated by who you are, it may be healthier to create distance than to contort yourself to please them.”

Share Button