Analysis: Andy Burnham’s Big Speech Left Big Questions He Refused To Answer

Andy Burnham today showed exactly why Labour MPs are desperate for him to replace Keir Starmer as prime minister as he laid out his vision for the country.

The former mayor of Greater Manchester was pretty much everything the current PM is not.

From the smart-casual clothes he wore to the easy charm with which he delivered his speech, this was clearly a man who – unlike Starmer – is very comfortable in his own skin.

His remedy for the UK’s ills also stand in marked contrast to the man who he will replace in 10 Downing Street in less than a month’s time.

Burnham was clear that he wants nothing less than the complete “rewiring” of the way Britain is run, with a huge shift of power away from Westminster to local communities and regions across England.

That, he said, would lead to the biggest council house building programme of the post-war period, economic growth “in every postcode”, lower energy bills and prices coming down in the shops.

He also signalled a massive change in education policy, with a greater focus on technical qualifications rather than the drive to get more young people to go to university.

“I am going to do things differently,” Burnham declared. “I am going to break with the ‘more of the same’ approach that has got us here.

“I am going to give Britain the circuit-breaker it needs by building a more collaborative politics in Westminster, by taking power out of the centre and putting it in the hands of the people and places who can use it best.”

A bit like motherhood and apple pie, there was little in the speech that any reasonable person could, in good faith, take exception to.

But for all the soaring rhetoric about putting “hope in every heart”, it lacked one important thing: an explanation of how it will all work in practice.

Burnham failed to explain how putting more power in the hands of local politicians rather than those in Whitehall will magically improve the lives of everyone in the country was not explained.

It was therefore unfortunate, to put it mildly, that the many journalists who had been invited to watch the speech were not then given the opportunity to ask him questions about it.

Because let’s not forget, this is a man who was not even an MP a month ago, and yet stands on the threshold of assuming the highest office in the land without even having to go to the trouble of winning a leadership contest, let alone a general election.

What’s more, he is a man who – for all his previous ministerial experience from 20 years ago – has not even been an MP for the best part of a decade.

If this is not the time for him to answer detailed questions about what exactly he plans to do with the reins of power, then when till it be?

How does he plan to stop the small boats crossing the English Channel, for instance, or get to grips with the ballooning welfare bill?

And that’s before we even come to how he plans to deal with the threat posed by Vladimir Putin or repair the UK government’s relations with Donald Trump’s White House.

Which brings us to another – more worrying – difference between Andy Burnham and Keir Starmer.

For all his faults, the soon-to-be-former PM would not have made a speech like that and then refused to take any questions on it.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Share Button

Resident doctors take strike action over pay

The BMA said there will “undoubtedly be cancellation of operations, outpatient appointments and elective care” but “patient safety will still be prioritised”.

Share Button

Why is pregnancy sickness drug not easily accessible to all?

BBC journalist Linzi Kinghorn finds out why a pregnancy sickness drug is not always accessible on the NHS.

Share Button

Brain activity under anesthesia challenges what we know about consciousness

Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine have discovered that the human brain can continue performing surprisingly advanced language tasks even when a person is fully unconscious under general anesthesia. The findings, published in Nature, challenge long held assumptions about the relationship between consciousness and cognition. They also offer new insights that could shape future research on memory, language, and brain-computer interfaces.

“Our findings show that the brain is far more active and capable during unconsciousness than previously thought,” said Dr. Sameer Sheth, professor and Cullen Foundation Endowed chair of neurosurgery and a McNair Scholar at Baylor. “Even when patients are fully anesthetized, their brains continue to analyze the world around them.”

Recording Brain Activity During Anesthesia

To investigate what the unconscious brain is capable of, Sheth and his colleagues recorded the activity of hundreds of individual neurons in the hippocampus, a brain region involved in memory. The recordings were made while patients undergoing epilepsy surgery were under general anesthesia. These procedures gave researchers a rare opportunity to study this part of the brain directly.

The team used Neuropixels probes, an advanced technology that had never before been used in the hippocampus for this type of research. This allowed them to observe how the brain responded to sounds and language even when patients had no conscious awareness.

The Brain Continued Processing Language

The first experiment exposed patients to a series of repeating tones with occasional unexpected sounds mixed in. The researchers found that neurons in the hippocampus consistently detected these unusual tones. Even more interesting, the brain became better at recognizing them over time, suggesting that learning or neural plasticity was still taking place during anesthesia.

The researchers then increased the complexity of the experiment by playing short stories while continuing to record brain activity. The hippocampus showed clear evidence of processing language in real time. Patterns of neural activity revealed that the brain could distinguish different parts of speech, including nouns, verbs, and adjectives.

The team also made another surprising discovery. Neural signals could be used to predict upcoming words before they were spoken.

“The brain appears to anticipate what comes next in a story, even without conscious awareness,” said Sheth, who is also Director of The Gordon and Mary Cain Pediatric Neurology Research Foundation Laboratories within the Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital.

“This kind of predictive coding is something we associate with being awake and attentive, yet it’s happening here in an unconscious state,” said Dr. Benjamin Hayden, professor of neurosurgery at Baylor.

Rethinking Consciousness

The findings suggest that important cognitive abilities, including language comprehension and prediction, may not depend on conscious awareness. Instead, consciousness itself may arise from communication across multiple brain regions rather than from activity within a single area such as the hippocampus.

The researchers also noted similarities between the brain’s predictive behavior and artificial intelligence (AI). Just as large language models generate text by anticipating the next word, the hippocampus appeared to make similar predictions during language processing. Understanding these shared principles could help scientists better understand both biological and artificial intelligence.

The work may also contribute to future communication technologies, including speech prosthetics designed for people who have lost the ability to speak.

“Can we use these signals to deploy and run a speech prosthetic for some of the parts of the brain that are damaged by stroke or injury? These are questions that we can now consider in relation to this part of the brain,” said Dr. Vigi Katlowitz, first author and a neurosurgery resident with Baylor.

More Research Is Needed

The researchers caution that the findings should be interpreted carefully. The study examined only one type of general anesthesia, so the results may not apply to other unconscious states such as sleep or coma. In addition, the research focused on a single brain region, and it remains unclear how broadly these processes occur throughout the brain.

“This work pushes us to rethink what it means to be conscious,” said Sheth. “The brain is doing much more behind the scenes than we fully understand.”

Share Button

These tiny soil microbes could rescue crops from salty farmland

Researchers have uncovered an unexpected natural ally that could help farmers tackle one of agriculture’s fastest growing challenges: salty soil.

A team including scientists from the University of East Anglia (UEA), led by Chinese researcher Dr. Yanfen Zheng, found that naturally occurring soil bacteria can significantly improve plants’ ability to survive in saline conditions.

The study also uncovered a previously unknown way these microbes protect crops such as maize, tomato, and rapeseed from salt stress. The discovery could eventually help farmers grow food on land that has become too salty for conventional agriculture.

Soil salinity threatens global agriculture

Salt buildup in farmland is becoming an increasingly serious problem because of climate change, irrigation practices, and rising sea levels. As salt accumulates in soil, it stunts plant growth, damages roots, and can sharply reduce crop yields.

Prof Jonathan Todd, from UEA’s School of Biological Sciences and the Quadram Institute on the Norwich Research Park, said: “The build-up of salt in farmland is a major and worsening problem — driven by climate change, irrigation and rising sea levels.

“Salt chokes plant growth, damages roots and severely impact entire harvests — putting global food supplies at risk.

“We know that plants rely on communities of microbes around their roots, called the root microbiome, to help them cope with environmental stress. But exactly how these relationships work, and whether they are consistent across crops and soils, has remained largely unclear.

“We found that plants appear to recruit beneficial bacteria in salty soil conditions, which in turn trigger internal changes that strengthen their physical structure and resilience.

“If scientists can harness this natural process, it could mark the beginning of a new era in climate-resilient agriculture.”

Root microbes drawn to salt stressed plants

To better understand these plant and microbe partnerships, the researchers examined root microbiomes from multiple crop species grown in different soil types.

They discovered that a group of naturally occurring bacteria known as pseudomonads consistently gathered around plant roots exposed to salt stress. The same pattern appeared across several crops, including maize, tomato, and rapeseed, suggesting this is a widespread biological response rather than something unique to a single plant.

Genetic analyses also explained why these bacteria perform so well in salty environments.

Prof Todd said: “Compared to other microbes, pseudomonads carry specialized genes that help them tolerate high salt levels, including sodium transport systems and other stress-resistance mechanisms.”

Stronger roots and higher yields

The team then introduced selected pseudomonad strains to soybean plants. In both greenhouse studies and field trials, the bacteria successfully colonized the roots and substantially improved plant growth under salty conditions.

“We found that plants treated with the microbes showed stronger root systems, better development and higher yields compared to untreated plants grown in salty soils,” said Prof Todd.

An unexpected plant defense

The researchers were surprised to discover that the bacteria were not helping plants by reducing salt levels inside their tissues.

“The most surprising thing was finding out how the bacteria helped plants cope.

“For decades, it was thought that plants survive salinity by controlling sodium levels -essentially keeping harmful salt out. But we found no evidence that bacteria influenced sodium transport or ion balance.

“Instead of helping plants manage salt directly, the bacteria stimulated the plant to produce more of a substance called lignin.

“Roots of bacteria-treated plants showed a significant increase in lignin content, with some measurements rising by over 30 percent under salt stress.”

Lignin strengthens plants naturally

Lignin is a strong, woody material that forms part of plant cell walls. It acts like a built in support system, reinforcing plant tissues and helping them withstand environmental stress.

The researchers identified the key genes responsible for increasing lignin production. When those genes were artificially overexpressed, plants performed much better in salty soil.

By contrast, plants that were unable to produce lignin did not benefit from the bacteria, showing that lignin production is essential to the newly discovered protective effect.

Prof Todd said: “We hope this discovery opens up new possibilities for agriculture.

“By harnessing naturally occurring microbes like pseudomonads, bio-based treatments could be developed that help crops grow in saline soils without heavy chemical inputs.

“With vast areas of farmland already affected by salinity and more under threat, microbial solutions could become an essential tool for maintaining crop yields and ensuring food security.”

The findings were published in the journal Science Advances in the paper, “Pseudomonads associated to salt-stressed plants facilitate stress adaption of soybean through enhanced lignin biosynthesis.”

Share Button

Over one million children referred for mental healthcare – with anxiety the main reason

Demand is soaring beyond capacity, meaning children in England wait years for help with various conditions.

Share Button

Loved and loathed: The making of India’s viral liver doctor

Dr Cyriac Abby Philips has built a large online following, but often clashes with India’s traditional medicine specialists.

Share Button

Catherine completes Three Peaks Challenge to ‘explore life beyond’ cancer diagnosis

The Princess of Wales did the endurance event to raise awareness about “holistic healthcare” for cancer patients.

Share Button

James Cleverly Fails To Back Kemi Badenoch Over Nazi Row

James Cleverly has refused to back Kemi Badenoch after she compared education secretary Bridget Phillipson to a Nazi.

The Tory leader said the cabinet minister “has acted like a Gestapo officer” by ending a tax break for private schools, which has led to some being forced to close due to falling pupil numbers.

She said: “I compared her to a Gestapo officer, acting like a Gestapo officer, with the way she was closing down those schools which didn’t appeal to her own ideology.”

Responding on X, Phillipson said: “The Gestapo marched hundreds of thousands of innocent people to their deaths. I’ve ended private schools’ tax breaks to invest in state schools.

“No responsible leader makes vile comparisons like this. Kemi Badenoch is not fit to be Prime Minister.”

On BBC One’s Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg show, shadow housing secretary Cleverly distanced himself from Badenoch’s choice of language.

Asked by presenter Victoria Derbyshire if he would have made that comparison, he said: “No I probably wouldn’t have done.”

Later in the interview, he said: “That wouldn’t have been the phraseology that I would use.”

Labour chair Anna Turley said: “Kemi’s top team won’t defend the indefensible because they know full well Kemi Badenoch’s comments were completely appalling and deeply inappropriate.

“Time and again Badenoch sinks below the standards the public rightly expect from a Leader of His Majesty’s opposition. The simple fact is she’s not up to the job.”

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Share Button

Victoria Derbyshire Roasts ‘Hypocritical’ Lucy Powell Over Liz Truss Snap Election Demand

Victoria Derbyshire branded Labour’s deputy leader “hypocritical” after she said Andy Burnham should not call a snap election, despite demanding one when Liz Truss quit.

Lucy Powell demanded the country go to the polls after Truss resigned as prime minister in October, 2022, after just 49 days in office.

On BBC One’s Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg, which was presented this morning by Derbyshire, Powell was reminded of a post she put on Facebook that day.

Derbyshire told her: “You posted ‘let the public decide the next prime minister. General election now’. Do you want a general election now so the public can decide their next prime minister?”

Powell said: “I think we were in very particular times after Liz Truss had crashed the economy, making big decisions that had nothing to do with the Conservative manifesto.”

But Derbyshire told her: “The principle is the same. Let the public decide on the next prime minister, you wrote. So that situation could apply to now. Do you want the public to decide on the next prime minister now?”

Changing tack, Powell said: “We live in a parliamentary democracy, where the prime minister is chosen by MPs.”

When the presenter pointed out that wasn’t what she was saying in 2022, Powell replied: “What we had then was two prime ministers in less than two months, one of whom who came along and didn’t listen to anyone around her.

“The big institutions that support this country took some big decisions for which every single one of us paid a very, very heavy price in inflation going through the roof and our mortgage rates going through the rook after a period of real disruption.”

Derbyshire said: “So you don’t think there should be a general election now. Is that not hypocritical?”

Powell replied: “No, I don’t think it is, because I think what people want to see now is us getting on with the job, delivering on the manifesto that we were elected on only two years ago.”

Burnham is set to become prime minister on July 20, barely a month after being elected MP for Makerfield.

Keir Starmer announced last Monday that he is standing down after losing the support of his MPs.

With no one else expected to throw their hat into the ring, Burnham will be named Labour leader at a special conference on July 17, and take over as PM three days later.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Share Button