Opinion: Karen Millen Called A Breastfeeding Mum ‘Selfish’ – Here’s Why She’s Wrong

I’m breastfeeding my 1.5-year-old so naturally we’re probably both addicted to it and she’s going to be emotionally ruined. That’s according to Karen Millen’s logic, anyway.

In a bizarre segment on Jeremy, Storm & Vanessa On 5 this week, in which for whatever reason they thought it was OK to pass judgement on a mum’s choice to breastfeed her three-year-old, the fashion designer suggested the parent had breastfed for “far too long”.

“There’s no benefit, is there, for a child to be breastfed beyond six months really,” said Millen.

And she didn’t stop there. “I think it’s quite a selfish thing on the mother’s part,” she continued.

When Vanessa Feltz pressed her on why she thought that, Millen replied: “Well I just think, you know, that’s not good emotionally for that child.

“I mean, what does that child do later in life and the attachment and, like you said, it becomes an addiction – and an addiction for that child too because they only know the boob … and it’s just not normal is it?”

I’m no expert in breastfeeding but I have breastfed two kids and can safely say what a load of codswallop (and that’s putting it politely).

As the NHS says, breastfeeding has long-term benefits for babies, lasting right into adulthood: “Any amount of breast milk has a positive effect. The longer you breastfeed, the longer the protection lasts and the greater the benefits.”

Breastfeeding can reduce a baby’s risk of infections, and diarrhoea and vomiting (with fewer visits to hospital as a result), as well as sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), obesity and cardiovascular disease in adulthood.

The World Health Organisation adds that “breastfeeding is one of the most effective ways to ensure child health and survival”.

Not only does breastmilk provide all the energy and nutrients babies need for the first months of life, but in the second half of the first year – which is when Karen thinks we should stop whipping out the boob – it can provide up to half or more of a child’s nutritional needs.

Oh, and up to one third of their nutritional requirements during the second year of life. (But go off Karen about how there’s no benefit past six months.)

As for the emotional damage we’re inflicting, according to the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) “there is no evidence that extended breastfeeding is harmful to parent or child”.

Whether a parent chooses to keep going, or stop breastfeeding, or feed their baby with formula milk, it’s ultimately their choice to do so – and they shouldn’t have to fear being shamed or slammed as “selfish” for doing so.

I’d argue that if you find it weird to see a kid breastfeeding, it probably says more about you and your feelings towards breasts than anything else.

The judgement emanating from that TV sofa – the suggestion it’s “selfish” to feed a child past a certain point, and “not good emotionally” for them – made me, as a breastfeeding mum, feel like a pariah. It was a gut punch – and I won’t be the only one who felt that.

The wrinkled noses, the scoffing, the wincing when a viewer called in and said they breastfed their child until the age of four… There is a huge stigma around extended breastfeeding. I’ve experienced it, I’ve written about it, I know it’s there.

And unhelpful – not to mention, incorrect – comments made on national TV simply add fuel to the fire. It’s yet another stick to beat mothers with. And honestly? I’m fed up of it.

If you’re not breastfeeding your baby, you’re shamed. If you are breastfeeding them past 12 months, you’re shamed. Honestly, you can’t win.

Millen has since apologised, saying: “I know I’ve upset a lot of your viewers and that was not my intention. The question was aimed at a three-year-old being breastfed and my thoughts on that and my answers reflected that, not the subject of breastfeeding…

“And as a woman to women, I do respect your choices and I do want to support you. So my apologies once again, I hope you forgive me.”

For those feeding their child and facing the comments – whether from relatives, friends or people on the TV who should know better – know that you’re not selfish, fuelling some weird boob addiction, or ruining your child emotionally.

Those who do manage to breastfeed past six months deserve a bloody medal, not the nation’s judgement.

Update: the article has been amended to include Karen Millen’s apology.

Share Button

Rachel Reeves Takes Axe To Whitehall Departments To Pay For Health And Defence Cash Splurge

Eight Whitehall departments will see their budgets slashed so that more cash can be spent on the NHS and defence.

The Home Office and Department for Transport are among those facing real-terms reductions in their day-to-day budgets as a result of chancellor Rachel Reeves’s spending review.

She announced that an extra £300 billion will be spent by the government over the next three years.

The NHS will enjoy a 3% rise in its budget after inflation, which works out at an extra £29 billion a year.

Meanwhile, defence spending will rise from 2.3% to 2.6% of gross domestic product (GDP) by 2027.

An extra £39 billion will be spent on building affordable homes over the next 10 years, while £14 billion is being spent on a new nuclear power plant at Sizewell C.

Reeves told MPs that departmental budgets will increase by 2.3% in real terms under plans.

She said she was “reflecting the choices of the British people” as she accused the Tories and Reform of having no plans for the economy.

But Treasury documents later revealed that a number of Whitehall departments will see their day-to-day budgets fall once inflation into account.

The Home Office faces a 1.7% fall, with the transport budget being reduced by 5% and the Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs being cut by 2.7%.

Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said: “The crux is that most departments will have larger real-terms budgets at the end of the parliament than the beginning, but in many cases much of that extra cash will have arrived by April.

“Eight departments will actually see cuts to their budget between this year and the end of the parliament.”

Police chiefs warned that the Home Office funding settlement will make it “incredibly difficult” for them to hit the government’s target of recruiting an extra 13,000 frontline officers.

Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesperson Daisy Cooper accused Reeves of “smoke and mirrors”.

She said: “This spending review was a missed opportunity to repair the damage done by the Conservatives and finally deliver on the promise of change.

“Behind the smoke and mirrors is a potential blackhole for social care as local government budgets remain at breaking point. Putting more money into the NHS without fixing social care is like pouring water into a leaky bucket.”

Sadiq Khan, the Labour mayor of London, also attacked the chancellor, claiming the capital had missed out on much-needed funds.

He said: “I remain concerned that this spending review could result in insufficient funding for the Met and fewer police officers.

“It’s also disappointing that there is no commitment today from the Treasury to invest in the new infrastructure London needs. Projects such as extending the Docklands Light Railway not only deliver economic growth across the country, but also tens of thousands of new affordable homes and jobs for Londoners.

“Unless the government invests in infrastructure like this in our capital, we will not be able to build the numbers of new affordable homes Londoners need.”

Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said the spending review was “not worth the paper that it is written on” and will inevitably lead to taxes going up in the autumn Budget to pay for it.

He said: “This is the spend now, tax later review, because [the chancellor] knows she will need to come back here in the autumn with yet more taxes and a cruel summer of speculation awaits.

“How can we possibly take this chancellor seriously after the chaos of the last 12 months?”

Share Button

Putin Ally Can’t Even Explain Own Bizarre Theory About West’s Ongoing Support For Ukraine

A senior figure within Vladimir Putin’s government has once again been pushing the Kremlin’s conspiracy theories about the West – but this time, she could not even explain the logic behind them.

The Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova claimed the West is “not interested” in its own citizens and instead wants to “escalate” the Ukraine war on Wednesday.

According to Russian state news agency TASS, she said: “They are not interested in the lives of their own people, the development of the economy, solving problems that are on the agenda of both the European continent and the whole world.

“They are interested in the escalation of the conflict and the continued use of the Kyiv regime and Ukraine for their own interests.”

She then added: “But what are these goals? It’s a good question to ask them.

“All this testifies to the aggressive attitude of the western European allies of the Kyiv regime, their maniacal desire to escalate the conflict at any price.”

According to Zakharova, it’s clear that the European Commission’s €150bn rearmament programme is “direct proof” they want to take the war to the next level.

The Kremlin spokesperson is overlooking that the west has actually tried to avoid being drawn directly into conflict with Russia for the last three years.

European allies have been investing and arming Ukraine to try and halt Putin’s land grab encroaching further into the continent.

Russia currently controls 18% of Ukrainian territory and has so far refused to agree to any long-term ceasefire deals.

The war could also end if Putin decided to pull his troops out of Ukraine.

US president Donald Trump has also tried to put pressure on both sides to end the war – even if it means resolving it on Putin’s terms – but Moscow keeps coming up with new conditions for peace.

Despite bombarding Ukraine consistently since invading in February 2022, Putin’s ambassador to the UK also accused Kyiv of intensifying the war last week after Ukraine deployed more than 100 attack drones across Russia.

Speaking to Sky News, Andrei Kelin said this was a “serious escalation” and claimed the UK had helped orchestrate the attack.

Keir Starmer’s spokesperson told reporters: “We’ve been round this a few times this week, we just don’t comment on operational matters.”

Share Button

Rachel Reeves Announces £39 Billion Housing Boost As She Vows To ‘Renew’ Britain

Rachel Reeves will announce plans to spend nearly £40 billion building affordable homes in a bid to solve the UK’s housing crisis.

The chancellor will outline details of the cash boost in the spending review on Wednesday.

It will be seen as a major victory for Angela Rayner, the deputy PM and housing secretary, who has been locked in a battle with the Treasury for more funding for her department.

Under the plans, £39bn will be spent over the next 10 years on a social and affordable homes programme, which works out at £3.9bn a year.

The last five-year programme, which comes to an end in 2026, was worth £11.5bn, or £2.3bn a year.

A government source said: “The government is investing in Britain’s renewal, so working people are better off.

“We’re turning the tide against the unacceptable housing crisis in this country with the biggest boost to social and affordable housing investment in a generation, delivering on our commitment to get Britain building.”

Reeves will confirm plans to spend billions on new transport links in the north and Midlands, and fund the completion of a new nuclear power station at Sizewell C.

The NHS and Ministry of Defence are expected to be the big winners in the financial settlement, with other departments facing real terms cuts to their budgets as Reeves tries to balance the nation’s books.

The chancellor will tell MPs: “This government is renewing Britain, but I know too many people in too many parts of the country are yet to feel it.

“My task – and the purpose of this Spending Review – is to change that.

“To ensure that renewal is felt in people’s everyday lives, their jobs, their communities.

“So that people can see a doctor when when they need one, know that they are secure at work and feel safe on their local high street.

“The priorities in this Spending Review are the priorities of working people. To invest in our country’s security, health and economy so working people all over our country are better off.

That is what this Spending Review will deliver.”

She will add: “I have made my choices. In place of chaos, I choose stability. In place of decline, I choose investment. In place of retreat, I choose national renewal.

“These are my choices. These are this Government’s choices. These are the British people’s choices.”

Share Button

UK Gardeners Urged To Put Garlic In Plant Water ‘Til October

Though slugs are rarely welcome in a gardener’s backyard, the Royal Horticultural Society have not classified them as “pests” for years now.

That’s partly because less than a quarter of the species in the UK actually eat your plants, while all of the maligned molluscs provide a food source for the UK’s shrinking bird population.

For these reasons, British gardeners have been discouraged from using pellets to deter the critters.

Other methods, like placing a halved orange or melon skin in your garden or conducting torchlit searches at night, can remove them from vulnerable saplings without killing all of them off indiscriminately.

And, as BBC Gardeners’ World writes, a bulb of garlic can help too.

Garlic water can repel slugs

According to the publication, “A home-made garlic spray can be effective in deterring slugs and snails from your plants” if applied regularly.

Allicin, a compound in garlic, both helps to repel and, sometimes, kill slugs and snails, botanist James Wong wrote for The Guardian.

For that reason, he says, you should only apply it to the most vulnerable plants (young seedlings and tender-stemmed plants count).

To make the garlic water concentrate, Gardeners’ World writes, boil one bulb of garlic per litre of water (they did two bulbs and two litres) until they’re soft.

James Wong, meanwhile, recommends blending a bulb of garlic with 1L of water, letting the liquid sit for ten minutes before straining “for the chemical reaction that creates allicin to complete.”

James uses his blitzed, rather than cooked, garlic water as-is, but Gardeners’ World dilutes two tablespoons of their boiled concentrate per 5L of water.

Whichever method you choose, you can spray it on affected plants “just as night begins to fall.”

How much should I apply, and how often?

For targeted slug and snail management, you should apply it “liberally.”

Gardeners’ World says you should spray or water with it once a week or after rain.

Specialist growers Sienna Hosta agree: they say we should water our plants with the stuff once weekly from February ’til October, when slugs are more active.

We should reapply it more often after heavy rainfall.

Share Button

UK Government Sanctions Two Israeli Ministers Over ‘Extremist’ Gaza Comments

The UK government has sanctioned two Israeli ministers for inciting “extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights”.

Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich will be subject to a travel ban and asset freeze under the measures announced by Britain alongside Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway.

The move has been condemned by the Israeli government, which said it was “outrageous”.

Both men belong to right-wing parties which help to prop up Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s fragile coalition government.

Smotrich has campaigned against allowing aid into Gaza, and also supported the expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, which are considered illegal under international law.

Ben-Gvir has called for Gaza’s people to be resettled from the territory.

In a joint statement with the foreign ministers of Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway, foreign secretary David Lammy said: “We are steadfastly committed to the two-state solution and will continue to work with our partners towards its implementation.

“It is the only way to guarantee security and dignity for Israelis and Palestinians and ensure long term stability in the region, but it is imperilled by extremist settler violence and settlement expansion.

“Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich have incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights. These actions are not acceptable. This is why we have taken action now – to hold those responsible to account.

“We will strive to achieve an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the immediate release of the remaining hostages by Hamas which can have no future role in the governance of Gaza, a surge in aid and a path to a two-state solution.”

A No.10 spokesman said: “These sanctions apply to the individuals in their personal capacities, not their ministries and departments.

“Ben-Gvir and Smotrich do not speak for all Israeli people … and have a long history of dangerous extremist and inflammatory views.

“As the Israeli ambassador to the UK has said in recent interviews, their statements in their ministerial capacities do not even represent government policy.

“Their agenda and actions undermine the interests of Israeli people, including security, many Israelis see this.

“So, today, with our international partners, we have announced measures against those ministers in a personal capacity.”

In a statement, the Israeli government said: “It is outrageous that elected representatives and members of the government are subjected to these kind of measures.”

Share Button

Rachel Reeves Agrees To Spend £14 Billion On New Nuclear Plant

Rachel Reeves has agreed to spend £14 billion of taxpayers’ money on a nuclear plant at Sizewell C.

The chancellor will announce the move, which is part of her spending review, at the GMB Congress on Tuesday.

It is expected to create 10,000 jobs, including 1,500 apprenticeships.

Energy secretary Ed Miliband said the project, which will be the first new nuclear plant to open in the UK since 1995, will help to usher in “a golden age of clean energy abundance”.

Sizewell C was one of eight potential sites for new nuclear plants identified in 2009, when Miliband was last energy secretary.

However, the project was never completed during 14 years of Tory government.

It is expected that the plant will come on stream in the 2030s.

Reeves said the announcement showed that Labour was “investing in Britian’s renewal”.

“We are creating thousands of jobs, kickstarting economic growth and putting more money people’s pockets,” she said.

Miliband said: “We will not accept the status quo of failing to invest in the future and energy insecurity for our country.

“We need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance, because that is the only way to protect family finances, take back control of our energy, and tackle the climate crisis.

“This is the government’s clean energy mission in action – investing in lower bills and good jobs for energy security.”

The Hinkley Point C nuclear plant, in Somerset, is under construction and is expected to produce enough power for about six million homes when it opens, but that may not be until 2031.

The government is also due to confirm one of Europe’s first small modular reactor programmes and will invest £2.5 billion over five years in fusion energy research as part of plans to boost the UK’s nuclear industry.

GMB regional secretary Warren Kenny said: “Nuclear power is essential for clean, affordable, and reliable energy – without new nuclear, there can be no net zero.

“Sizewell C will provide thousands of good, skilled, unionised jobs and we look forward to working closely with the Government and Sizewell C to help secure a greener future for this country’s energy sector.”

But Alison Downes of the ‘Stop Sizewell C’ group said ministers had not “come clean” about the full cost of the project, which the group have previously estimated could be some £40 billion.

“There still appears to be no final investment decision for Sizewell C, but £14.2 billion in taxpayers’ funding, a decision we condemn and firmly believe the government will come to regret,” she said.

Share Button

The Rudest Things You Can Do In A Lift

There are few places more ripe with the opportunity for awkwardness and even downright rude behaviour than lifts. They’re small, often crowded and require you to be mere inches from complete strangers.

When it comes to how to act in a lift, experts told HuffPost that you have to remember that they’re public spaces.

“People tend to forget that lifts are still public shared spaces,” said Tami Claytor, the owner of Always Appropriate Image and Etiquette Consulting.

“It’s not that you’re already in your office and you can close the door, or in your apartment and you can close the door — you’re still in a public space, and people should conduct themselves accordingly.”

“You have to observe and respect that public space just like you would someone’s home or a hotel lobby, and you must be respectful of the property itself [and] assume that there are eyes on you because there might be a camera up in the top corner,” said Diane Gottsman, a national etiquette expert and founder of the Protocol School of Texas.

Most people don’t get into a lift with the goal of being rude, but there are some common behaviours that are off-putting to your fellow lift riders.

Below, etiquette experts share the elevator no-nos that irk them most:

Not holding the door for someone else

There’s no excuse not to hold the door for someone who is coming up behind you to also get on the lift, experts told HuffPost.

While it’s rude to let the door slam in anyone’s face, Claytor added that it’s particularly rude if the person who’s walking behind you is elderly, uses medical equipment such as a walker, or has a stroller.

“There’s a gentleman who lives in my building who never holds the lift for anyone, and when my mother was alive, she used a walker, and he would not just wait a few seconds for her to catch up to him, he would just let the door close in her face,” Claytor noted.

Conversely, it’s also rude to hold the elevator door too long

You also shouldn’t hold a lift door too long and hold up other people’s day.

“Let’s say you’re traveling with a friend or a partner … and they are running just a little bit behind, but you’ve got to go, and you’re in a hurry, so you want to hold that lift door for them, even though they’re not even there yet,” said Gottsman.

“So, you’re kind of waiting, waiting, waiting, because it’s rush hour, it’s time to get out … so, you’re holding it because your friend is not quite ready with a suitcase,” Gottsman noted. “You have to let it go. You can’t hold up that elevator car while waiting for someone who’s not there.”

You can go downstairs without them, or get off tand wait for them, but you can’t just hold the door for someone who isn’t ready.

More, you shouldn’t hold a lift door open to finish a conversation with someone who isn’t actually getting on, Claytor said. Maybe you’re leaving the office and getting in a few last-minute words with your colleague before going home.

“Have you ever been in a situation where someone’s holding the lift, they’re inside or outside the lift, and they’re holding a conversation with someone? And so now you’re stuck, you’re trapped on this lift, and people are holding a conversation,” Claytor said.

You should either get off the lift and continue the conversation, or get on and end it, she added.

Not facing forward

You shouldn’t face backwards in a lift, said Gottsman. Once you’re in an lift you should face forward — so, face the door, once you’re inside.

“Even though it’s a public space, we still feel as if we need to have some privacy in that space,” Gottsman said. “You don’t want someone staring at you.”

Natalia Lebedinskaia via Getty Images

Pushing into a crowded lift

“We’ve all experienced it, every single one of us … the door opens, you’re in the lift being crushed already, and then there are three people standing there, or one person, and they’ll say, ‘Oh, is there a room for me?’” Gottsman said. “You clearly know there’s no room for you. We are sardines in this little can.”

Nonetheless, they squeeze into the lift “and no one wants to say anything because everyone wants to be polite, but it is so crowded that you can’t breathe,” said Gottsman.

“And just think of potentially, what could happen if that lift gets stuck, and then what are you going to do?” she said.

Overcrowding a lift is a big faux pas, and you should read the room before stepping in, Gottsman said. If there’s no room to fit comfortably, wait 20 seconds for the next elevator.

Not covering your mouth when you cough and sneeze

While it’s never OK to just cough or sneeze out in the open, it’s especially rude in a space that isn’t even six feet across.

If you’re on a lift and you cough or sneeze, it’s important that you cover your mouth — otherwise it’s really rude to the other passengers, Claytor noted.

No one wants to be sneezed or coughed on by a stranger.

Talking on speakerphone

Lifts aren’t exactly mobile phone friendly — service is often spotty and no one wants to hear you yammer away, anyway.

“I would prefer if people would pause their [phone] conversations until they got to their personal space, but if you absolutely have to continue this conversation, definitely do not use speakerphone,” said Claytor.

“No one else on the lift wants to hear your conversation,” she said.

Plus, you don’t know who may know the person you’re talking to on the phone, Gottsman added.

“A client of mine had a personal experience where they were on the lift and someone on the phone was talking about them on speaker. So, the person in the lift didn’t know them, but they were talking about that person,” explained Gottsman.

Shoving people out of the way to get off the lift

If you’re in the back of a crowded elevator and need to get off, you shouldn’t just push your way forward, Gottsman noted.

Instead, you should speak up and say something like, “Excuse me, this is my floor,” Gottsman said.

“Let them know. Don’t just try and push through,” she said.

People should move to the side to let you off, Gottsman added. “You’ve got to get out so you can let other people out, and then you can get back in and hold that door for yourself and for them,” Gottsman said.

Wearing too much cologne or perfume

A lift is a supremely small space. No one wants to be in a tiny, enclosed space with someone who just dosed themselves in fragrance, and forcing someone to stand directly next to you after you put on lots of cologne or perfume is rude, both experts told HuffPost.

This doesn’t mean that you can’t wear a fragrance, but you should be mindful of how much you put on if you know you have to get into an elevator.

“Just be mindful that scents linger,” Gottsman said.

When it comes to being your best self in a lift (or any public space, for that matter), Claytor has some advice: “At its very fundamental level, etiquette is about thinking of others before you think of yourself.”

So, instead of disregarding those around you by letting the door slam in their face or pushing off a crowded lift, think about how that may make others feel.

“I like to tell people … just slow down for a moment. Don’t always be in such a rush, and just observe the world around you, and that will make you a more conscientious person,” Claytor said.

Share Button

Zia Yusuf Says Reform Would Deport All Illegal Immigrants – But Nigel Farage Has Said That’s ‘Impossible’

Reform UK’s former chairman has said the party would deport all illegal immigrants, despite Nigel Farage previously saying it was “impossible”.

Zia Yusuf made the pledge in his first broadcast interview since returning to a senior role in the party.

He stunned Westminster by resigning as chairman on Thursday, only to return to the fold 48 hours later. Yusuf is now heading up Reform’s equivalent of Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

On Radio 4′s Today programme this morning, he said: “Reform will deport every illegal immigrant in this country.

“I want to be crystal clear about what my position is, and Reform UK’s position is, which is we will deport everybody who is here in this country illegally, which is roughly about 1.2 million people.”

But that put him at odds with Farage, who last year declared that mass deportations could not be done.

Asked by GB News if he supported removing all illegal immigrants, he said: “It’s impossible to do. Literally impossible to do.

“For us, at the moment, it’s a political impossibility.”

Asked if it was his ambition to be able to do it, Farage replied: “No. So it’s pointless even going there.

“It’s a political impossibility, we simply can’t do it.”

Share Button

This £15 Sunscreen-Primer Is The 1 Beauty Product I Can’t Live Without

We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI – prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.

In my twenties, I applied SPF on holidays and if it was a particularly hot day back home. But when my partner, then in his early 30s, was diagnosed with basal cell carcinoma and needed surgery to remove it, I knew I needed to wake up and wear the damn sun cream every single day.

After trying many different products – lots of which triggered breakouts, some of which dried my skin – I finally took a punt on Beauty Pie’s Featherlight SPF 50/Primer hybrid (£25, or £15 for members). And I haven’t looked back since.

The product, made in Switzerland, contains ingredients to “help fight inflammation and sun damage”. It’s known as a non-comedogenic SPF, meaning the lightweight formula shouldn’t clog pores. I can confirm it doesn’t.

I’ve also never had sunburn on my face while wearing it, so I’m guessing (/hoping) it’s doing the trick in the sun damage department.

I tend to apply the SPF after Beauty Pie’s triple hyaluronic acid deep moisture miracle cream (£45, or £22 for members) and the result is lusciously luminous skin that feels silky smooth.

The primer adds a bit of a glow that no other skincare product seems to offer me and my typically dull skin. It’s not greasy, or streaky. Makeup goes on a treat, too.

There is not a day that goes by when I don’t use it – even those days when I’m sat at home, makeup free, I make sure that I slather this on my face after showering.

It’s pretty watery – so be careful when you squeeze the bottle – but it glides onto the skin wonderfully, leaving your face feeling hydrated and glowy.

There are 3,102 reviews (and counting) on Beauty Pie’s site. Here’s a snippet of what people are saying about the Featherlight SPF:

“Lovely product, non greasy and perfect under make up. Thoroughly recommend this product.”

“This was first given to me as a gift a few years ago and I have used it ever since. I golf and have had no sun damage since using this lovely, light cream.”

“This is my second purchase of this item. I love that it properly hydrates my skin and most importantly, it doesn’t leave white streaky marks!”

“Spent ages looking for a SPF that I’m not allergic to and isn’t greasy, this one is perfect.”

If there was only one product I was allowed to take on a desert island, this would be it – not even the Collection eyeliner I’ve been buying and wearing on repeat since the early 2000s could rival it.

And at £15 for a bottle that lasts roughly six months (maybe longer, depending on how liberally you apply it), I’m wondering why you’re still reading this article and not buying a basket full for yourself…

Share Button